The present invention relates to the locking mechanism arts. It finds particular application as a lock for a cabinet door of a cabinet type wherein the door is movable through the frame of the cabinet, such as in a Lazy Susan cabinet.
Lazy Susan-type cabinets are found in many dwellings and other structures. Oftentimes occupying a corner of a room, such cabinets typically attempt to make use of such “corner space” by using generally circular shelves which are rotatable about a central axis. A user rotates the shelves to access items stored thereon.
Access to the shelves is usually gained via a wedge-shaped cut at the intersection of the faces of two lines of cabinets. This wedge-shaped cut is often cut into the circular shelf itself, so that in a “closed” position the wedge-shaped cut lines up with the exterior faces of the two lines of cabinets which intersect at the Lazy Susan cabinet. For aesthetic and functional reasons, panels are often added to the exterior of the wedge-shaped cut in the circular shelf, so that in the “closed” position the Lazy Susan cabinet appears to be just two more panels in the sequence of panels which comprise the face of the cabinet lines which intersect at the Lazy Susan cabinet. Such panels are usually deemed to be the “door” of the Lazy Susan cabinet.
In order to access the circular shelves of the Lazy Susan cabinet, the shelves are rotated by a user in either direction. Such rotation facilitates accessing all parts of the shelves as the shelves rotate in a complete circle. In order to allow such rotation, however, the panels attached to the wedge-shaped cut in the shelves must be shaped and sized so that they freely move through the wedge-shaped cut in the cabinet frame. To “open” a Lazy Susan-type cabinet, a user applies a force to one of the panels. The panels rotate along with the circular shelves, facilitating access to the shelves once the panels rotate through the cabinet frame.
It is often desirable to selectively restrict rotation of a Lazy Susan, such as, e.g., when a toddler is roaming around a house and very desirous of determining the contents of the Lazy Susan (the contents of which may be dangerous if consumed). Pet owners also may be desirous of restricting access to the contents of a Lazy Susan by a dog or cat up to mischief. Such restricted access, however, is desirably selective, as such a restriction should be easily by-passable by the owner of the contents in the cabinets (such as the parents of a the toddler or owners of the pet).
It is currently known to facilitate such selective restrictive access by use of child-safety lock(s). In one type of commonly available child-safety device, a cabinet lock is mounted to the frame of a Lazy Susan cabinet. The door of the cabinet is trapped between two restraining members which protrude from the mount. One of the restraining members is fixed, while the other is rotatable between a first position (wherein the door is trapped) and a second position (wherein the door may rotate in a direction opposite from the fixed restraining member). Rotation of the rotatable restraining member is controlled by a rotation-lock which is designed to be child-proof but easily actuated by an adult. In the locked position, the door can not rotate. In the unlocked position, the door is freely rotatable in a direction away from the fixed member until the previously-trapped door member reaches the fixed member after rotation of slightly less than 360°, at which time further rotation in such direction is prohibited by the fixed member. Furthermore, in the unlocked position, the door is not freely rotatable in a direction towards the fixed member while the previously-trapped door member abuts the fixed member (e.g., immediately upon unlocking the door). Such a lock thus does not facilitate continual rotation of the Lazy Susan (i.e., greater than one rotation) and furthermore does not facilitate rotation of the Lazy Susan in a direction toward the fixed member upon unlocking the lock (to facilitate access to contents directly behind the door which is trapped, a user need rotate the Lazy Susan through greater than 300°). Such restrictions are cumbersome and irritating to users who wish to access the Lazy Susan.
Another type of commonly-available child safety device employs dual cabinet locks, each of which is adapted for a cabinet of the type wherein the door rests on the face of the cabinet in the closed position (i.e., the door does not rotate through the frame). Each lock is adapted to prohibit a door from swinging in a direction away from the cabinet frame (e.g., by a hook which is temporarily removable by an adult's finger). One such lock is applied to each of sides of the wedge-shaped frame, so that each frame prohibits rotation of the Lazy Susan in a direction away from each side. Two locks are required, for use of only one lock would prohibit rotation in only one direction, thus freely allowing rotation in the other direction. Such a dual implementation is unsightly and difficult to use because, for instance, often both locks must be undone to facilitate access to the contents of the Lazy Susan (e.g., when searching requires rotation in more than one direction).
In accordance with one embodiment of the present invention, a lock for a cabinet of the type wherein a door of the cabinet is movable through a frame of the cabinet is provided. The lock includes a first and a second restraining member connected by a rod and rotatable around an axis of rotation between a first and a second position. In the first position, a cabinet member is positioned between the restraining members and the door is restricted from moving through the frame. In the second position, the door is movable through the frame. The lock may include a mounting member for mounting on a cabinet member and for retaining at least one section of the rod. The lock may further include one or more rotation locks, such as a child safety prevention lock, and one or more rotation restraints.
In accordance with another embodiment of the present invention, a lock for a cabinet having a door movable through a frame is provided. The lock includes a first and a second restraining member connected by a rod and rotatable around an axis of rotation between a first position and a second position. The first and second restraining members with the rod form at least a rigid u-shaped construct. In the first position the door is trapped between the restraining members, and in the second position the door is freely movable through the frame. The lock further includes a mounting member located between the restraining members and retaining at least one section of the rod. The lock may further include one or more rotation locks.
In accordance with still another embodiment of the present invention, a lock for a Lazy Susan cabinet having a door rotatable through a frame is provided. The lock includes a first and a second restraining member connected by a rod and rotatable around an axis of rotation between a first position and a second position. The first and second restraining members with the rod form a rigid h-shaped construct. In the first position the door is trapped between the restraining members, and in the second position the door is freely movable through the frame. The lock further includes a mounting member located between the restraining members and retaining at least one section of the rod. The lock further includes a child safety lock for selectively allowing rotation of the restraining members.
An advantage of the present invention is that a single lock may selectively restrict movement of a door through a frame and also allow movement of the door through the frame in both directions. A user of a cabinet is not restricted to accessing the contents of the cabinet via one way motion (e.g., rotation) of the cabinet trays, and a user need not use two locks to perform a similar function. A further advantage is that a cabinet lock may be mounted on a cabinet with little clearance between the top of the door and the inside of the frame. Yet a further advantage is that a cabinet lock may be mounted on a cabinet with little or no ceiling clearance room. Still yet a further advantage is that a cabinet lock may be mounted on the cabinet door, on the cabinet frame, or both. Still yet a further advantage is that a user-friendly child-safety lock for a Lazy Susan is provided. These and other aspects and advantages of the invention will be readily understood and appreciated from the following detailed description of one or more embodiments of the invention with reference to the accompanying Figures.
In the accompanying drawings which are incorporated in and constitute a part of the specification, embodiments of the invention are illustrated, which, together with a general description of the invention given above, and the detailed description given below, serve to example the principles of this invention.
In an embodiment, the present invention is directed to a lock for a cabinet of the type wherein a door of the cabinet is movable through a frame of the cabinet. An exemplary lock of the present invention includes a first and second restraining member connected by a rod and rotatable around an axis of rotation between a first position (wherein a cabinet member is trapped between the restraining members and the door can not move through the frame) and a second position (wherein the door is freely movable through the frame). The lock optionally includes a mounting member having a rod-retaining section and optionally one or more rotation lock(s) and/or one or more rotation restraint(s). The restraining members are optionally sized and shaped to facilitate rotation between the first and second position while accommodating different sizes and specifications of cabinet types, such as, e.g., a cabinet which has minimal interior vertical clearance above the top edge of the frame or a cabinet which has minimal clearance between the top of the door and the top underside of the frame. The lock optionally includes one or more strengthening members and end extensions angled on one or both ends of the rod. In additional embodiments of the present invention, the lock includes at least one friction pad for contacting a cabinet member and an adjustable connection between the rod and at least one restraining member.
With reference to
In a Lazy Susan cabinet of the type illustrated in
With reference to
With reference to
First and second restraining members 300 and 310 are any suitable shape and size for prohibiting movement of the door 130 through the frame 140 in the first position and for facilitating movement of the door 130 through the frame 140 in the second position. In an embodiment, the restraining members are generally rectangular in shape (see, for an additional example, the restraining members of Figures series 6 and 7).
The restraining members may each or both be shaped to accommodate one or more features of a cabinet. For example, either or both restraining members 300 and 310 may have generally planar exterior edges 370 which, when in the second position, are generally co-planar with either or both mounting member 340 (described further herein) and/or the top of door 130. In this regard, when in the second position, the restraining members are removed as much as possible from inhibiting movement of the door through the frame. In embodiments including a mounting member 340, the restraining members may be adapted so that the exterior edges 370, while in the second position, extend no further from the frame 140 than the mounting member 340 (e.g., the external edges 370 are co-planar with or not extending as far as the underside plane of the mounting member). Either restraining member is optionally shaped for aesthetic or other purposes. For example, first restraining member 300 optionally has an outer end 380 which is narrowed with respect to the remainder of the restraining member. In this regard, the first restraining member 300, while in the first position, obscures less of the external appearance of the door while maintaining the ability to trap the door and further maintaining the ability to, while in the second position, facilitate movement of the door through the frame.
In embodiments of the present invention wherein the rod is mounted through the frame (as described herein), the exterior edges 370 may be adapted so as to either (while in the second position) not extend beyond the edge of the cabinet member upon which they are mounted or so as to extend any suitable distance from the cabinet member upon which they are mounted. In embodiments of the present invention wherein the rod is mounted upon the frame (such as, e.g., with a mounting member 340), the exterior edges 370 are adapted to (while in the second position) extend any suitable distance from the cabinet member upon which they are mounted. A distance is suitable if it allows movement of the door through the frame while the restraining members are in the second position. In an embodiment wherein the exterior edges 370 extend beyond the cabinet member upon which the restraining members are mounted, the distance between the exterior edges 370 and the portion of the cabinet member upon which the restraining members are mounted is determined by the distance between the door and frame at the point where the lock is attached, and is generally between one tenth of an inch and five inches. An exemplary distance that the exterior edges 370 extend from the cabinet member is between about one-sixteenth of an inch and about one-quarter of an inch. In another embodiment, an exemplary distance is about one-eight of an inch. It will be appreciated that one restraining member need not have the same size or shape as the other.
Each restraining member is adapted to any suitable length. For example, the second restraining member may have a shorter length adapted for cabinets with reduced vertical clearance. Many cabinets have an interior ceiling which is significantly higher than the underside of the top of the frame 140. In such cabinets, the second (here, the internal) restraining member 310 may be of equal or greater length than the first restraining member, as sufficient clearance exists as the restraining members are rotated to the first position and the inner end 390 of the second restraining member rotates up into the internal ceiling area of the cabinet. Many other cabinets, however, have an interior ceiling which does not have significant clearance from the underside of the top of the frame. The vertical difference between the underside of the frame and the underside of the ceiling may be half an inch or less. As such, rotation of the second restraining member along the axis of rotation 330 (discussed further herein) may be inhibited as the inner end 390 comes in contact with the ceiling of the cabinet. In an embodiment of the present invention, the length of either restraining member, and particularly the second restraining member, is adapted to facilitate rotation into the second position in a cabinet having a reduced ceiling clearance. The length is adapted in any suitable manner. For example, the distance from the inner end 390 to the axis of rotation 330 is reduced to facilitate rotation of the second restraining member into the first position. The distance between the inner end 390 and the axis of rotation 330 may be less than the distance between the inner end 392 and the axis of rotation. In an embodiment, this difference is about one-half of an inch or less. In an embodiment, the inner end 390 of the second restraining member is shortened to the axis of rotation 330. In another embodiment, the inner end 390 of the second restraining member is shortened to extend beyond the axis of rotation while in the first position by an amount equal to or slightly less than the clearance between the top of the door and the underside of the ceiling of the cabinet, which is generally between one tenth of an inch and one inch. In an embodiment, the inner end 390 extends one-half of an inch from the axis of rotation.
First and second restraining members 300 and 310 are connected by rod 320. In an embodiment of the present invention, rod 320 is connected to each restraining member in any suitable manner which facilitates concurrent rotation of both restraining members and further maintains a relatively constant distance between the restraining members. In this regard, when one of the restraining members is rotated about the axis of rotation 330, as generally defined by the rod 320, the rod transfers this rotational motion to the other restraining member so that the other restraining member rotates with the first restraining member. For example when a lock of the present invention is mounted on a cabinet frame, the first restraining member is easily accessible to a user, while the second restraining member is located towards the interior of the cabinet. The user may grasp the first restraining member and rotate the first restraining member between the first and the second positions. The rod 320 transfers the rotational motion of the first restraining member to the second restraining member, whereby the second restraining member moves in concert with the first restraining member. As such, when the first restraining member is moved between the first and second position, the second restraining member is similarly moved, thus locking and unlocking the door.
The rod 320 furthermore maintains a relatively constant distance between the restraining members (which is optionally adjustable, as described below). For example, the rod 320 is sized with any suitable length for maintaining a distance between the restraining members which is suitable for trapping a cabinet member. A suitable trapping distance is any distance which is greater than the width of the cabinet member to be trapped. Optionally, the trapping distance is sized to be only slightly wider than the width of the cabinet member to be trapped, as such a slight increase in width provides a “snug” fit which inhibits “play” or rattling of the cabinet member while it is trapped by the restraining members. Exemplary trapping distances range from about one-quarter of an inch to about two inches. In an embodiment, a trapping distance is about one inch. At such a suitable trapping distance, while in the first position, the restraining members trap a cabinet member and prohibit the door from moving through the frame. In an exemplary embodiment, the first and second restraining members and the rod form a generally rigid “H”-shaped construct which, while in the first position, prohibit movement of the door through the frame as the outer ends of each restraining member contact the door, the inner ends of each restraining member contact the frame, and the rod maintains a fixed distance between the restraining members which maintains each restraining member in contact with both the door and the frame. Movement of the door towards the first restraining member is restricted by overlap of the inner end 390 of the second restraining member with the frame 140. Movement of the door away from the first restraining member is restricted by overlap of the inner end 392 of the first restraining member with the frame 140.
In an exemplary embodiment including a mounting member 340 (described further herein), the first and second restraining members and the rod form a generally rigid “h”-shaped construct wherein the inner end 390 is in line with or co-planar with the axis of rotation, and does not extend beyond the axis of rotation. In this embodiment, the cabinet member (in the first position) is trapped between the restraining members which themselves are connected by the rod which is rigidly (in terms of lateral movement) mounted to another cabinet member by the mounting member. As the restraining members are rigidly connected to the rod, and as the rod is rigidly connected to the other cabinet member, the restraining members are prohibited from lateral movement. When the first cabinet member is trapped between the restraining members, it similarly is prohibited from movement.
In yet another exemplary embodiment (not shown) including a mounting member 340, the first and second restraining members and the rod form a generally rigid “u”-shaped construct wherein the inner ends 390 and 392 are in line with or co-planar with the axis of rotation, and do not extend beyond the axis of rotation. Movement of the door while in the first position is prohibited similarly as described above for the generally “h”-shaped construct. While the previous few embodiments have been described with reference to “H”, “h” and “u” shaped constructs consisting of the first and second restraining member with the rod, it will be appreciated that such constructs may be as few as one piece; e.g., the construct may be integral. In such an example, the restraining members and the rod are integral, with each comprising a section of the overall construct. It will be understood that reference to the restraining members and the rod forming a construct of any shape (including but not limited to “H”, “h” and “u”) means forming a construct of one or more pieces, which includes but is not limited to a single, integral construct (having, e.g., a first and second restraining member section and a rod section) and a construct with more than one piece (e.g., a first and a second restraining member connected by a rod). Furthermore, it will be understood that “rigid,” as used herein, is used generically and includes, but is not limited to, being generally rigid.
With reference to
In still another suitable embodiment, rod 320 has one or more end extensions 410 on one or more end. Each or any end extension is optionally embedded in one or more restraining members. An exemplary end extension extends at roughly a 90° angle from the longitudinal axis of the rod 320 in either or both directions along the length of a restraining rod. While this embodiment is described in terms of 90° angled connection, it will be appreciated that any suitable angle may be used. Each end extension 410 may optionally run the entire length of a restraining member from the rod to an end of the restraining member. Optionally more than one end extension 410 is attached to one or both ends of rod 320. In this regard, the end extensions may extend in opposite directions from the rod 320, forming a rigid “T” construct. Further optionally, “T” constructs are added at each end of rod 320, wherein the rod 320 has an overall structure similar to a rigid “H”.
With reference to
Mounting member 340 is adapted for mounting on a cabinet member by any suitable mechanism and in any suitable manner. For example, mounting member 340 is adapted to receive one or more screws and/or nails for mounting the member 340 onto a cabinet member. While embodiments of the present invention will be described with reference to mounting via one or more screws, it will be appreciated that any suitable mounting mechanism, such as one or more clips, one or more vices, adhesive(s), Velcro, magnets or other vehicles for electromagnetic forces (such as electrostatic charge) may be used. In an embodiment, with reference to
A rod-retaining section 345 of mounting member 340 is adapted to receive at least one section of rod 320. Rod-retaining section 345 is any suitable thickness for receiving at least one section of rod 320. For example, with reference to
In embodiments of the present invention which include a mounting member 340, it is likely that the mounting member 340 will receive a significant portion of the force of the door when a user attempts to move a door which is trapped by restraining members connected by rod 320 which is itself partially retained by the mounting member 340. As such, mounting member 340 is adapted to be reasonably strong enough to resist such force while retaining the rod 320 and while remaining mounted upon a cabinet member. Mounting member 340 is so adapted in any suitable manner. For example, with reference to
With reference to
With further reference to the
Rotation lock retaining section 349 is any suitable shape and size for including one or more rotation locks 360 and/or one or more rotation restraints 350. In the embodiment illustrated in the
Rotation restraints 350 and 351 optionally restrict rotation of the restraining members. For example, it may be desirable to limit rotation of the restraining members to the 90° rotation required to rotate the restraining members from the first to the second position and back (i.e., rotation beyond 90° may have undesirable consequences). A rotation restraint is any suitable construct for restricting rotation of the restraining members, including but not limited to a bump, a raised surface, a block, a catch and a void. In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in the
Rotation lock retaining section 349 further optionally includes one or more rotation locks 360. A rotation lock is any suitable mechanism for selectively prohibiting or allowing rotation of the restraining members. Exemplary suitable mechanisms include known child-restraint locking/unlocking mechanisms (e.g., a child safety lock). Generally speaking, such mechanisms include a lock or a lock trigger which may be actuated or triggered by the actions of an adult but not by a non-adult, such as a toddler. Typically, such mechanisms require a level of force which a child can not provide, or require a combination of actions which a child usually can not master, or incorporate dimensions which not readily accessible to a child (such as requiring a longer finger to reach a trigger), or combinations thereof. A typical rotation lock includes a pin or tab which is attached to an extension which is movable, usually by bending, upon the application of force at a certain point of the extension. The force and dexterity of an adult is required to apply force properly to the extension in order to effectuate movement of the pin. Only when the pin is moved is the required action (e.g., opening of a cabinet or a refrigerator door) facilitated. Movement of the pin is usually away from a receiving aperture or a blocking restraint, such as when a pin is removed from an aperture or when a tab is moved from a blocking restraint.
A rotation lock 360 is optionally located on one or more restraining members, on the rotation lock retaining section, the rod retaining section, or any combination thereof. For example, a rotation lock may include a plurality of components, some of which are contained on the rotation lock retaining section and some of which may be contained on one or more restraining members.
An exemplary rotation lock is illustrated in the
With further reference to
With reference to
With reference to
Retaining member 660 optionally includes mount section 670 for mounting upon a cabinet member. Mount section 670 includes any suitable mounting mechanism, including but not limited to one or more screw holes. While a mounting mechanism has been illustrated on mount section 670, it will be appreciated that one or more mounting mechanism may be included upon any suitable part of retaining member 660. Retaining member 660 further optionally includes one or more rotation restraints (not shown) and/or one or more rotation locks 680. Rotation lock 680 is any suitable rotation lock as described herein. In the exemplary rotation lock illustrated in
With reference to
Lock 700 optionally includes rotation lock retaining section 720. Rotation lock retaining section 720 is adapted for mounting on a cabinet member by any suitable mounting mechanism, including but not limited to one or more screw holes 735. Retaining section 720 further retains at least a section of rod 706 and is optionally adapted to abut the first restraining member 704. Retaining section 720 may be mounted on a cabinet member, optionally between the first restraining member and the cabinet member itself. Retaining section 720 further optionally includes one or more rotation restraints 730 and/or one or more rotation locks 740. As the rod 706 is mounted in the cabinet member as opposed to upon an edge of the cabinet member, the rod may be thicker (and thus of greater strength) and the axis of rotation 750 may be farther removed (e.g., higher) from the base 760 of the restraining members and the retaining section.
With reference to
In a further example of a friction pad, with reference to
With reference to
The restraining member 1010 may freely move across the adjustable section 1030 until a desired location is determined. Adjustable section 1030 has a plurality of notches 1050 adapted for receiving one or more locks 1060. Once a desired location is determined, lock 1060 is slipped over adjustable section 1030 and moved until it abuts the restraining member 1010. Lock 1060 engages the notch closest to the position of the lock as it abuts the restraining member is its desired location. Optionally a second lock precedes the restraining member to lock the restraining member on the other side. Still further optionally, the restraining member 1010 has a rod engaging mechanism (not shown) which fixes the restraining member to the desired location on the rod 1020.
The components of a lock of the present invention are made of any suitable material, including but not limited to plastic, metal, alloys, vinyl, wood or combinations thereof. In certain embodiments, the rod is made of metal, piano wire or other suitably strong materials while the remaining components are made of durable plastic. In other embodiments, a metal strengthening plate is added for strength.
While the present invention has been illustrated by the description of embodiments thereof, and while the embodiments have been described in considerable detail, the scope of the appended claims should not be restricted or in any way limited to such detail. Additional advantages and modifications will readily appear to those skilled in the art. Therefore, the invention, in its broader aspects, is not limited to the specific details, the representative embodiments, and illustrative examples shown and described. Accordingly, departures may be made from such details without departing from the spirit or scope of the invention disclosed herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
82537 | Markham | Sep 1868 | A |
249761 | Hassinger | Nov 1881 | A |
251139 | Sc hram | Dec 1881 | A |
437559 | Blandin | Sep 1890 | A |
568638 | Sweet | Sep 1896 | A |
574518 | Berry | Jan 1897 | A |
973919 | Cline | Oct 1910 | A |
980663 | Morgan | Jan 1911 | A |
1200260 | Still | Oct 1916 | A |
1471206 | Reynolds | Oct 1923 | A |
1482652 | Klepper | Feb 1924 | A |
1597581 | David-Moss | Aug 1926 | A |
1608588 | Dundek et al. | Nov 1926 | A |
1904291 | Neilson et al. | Apr 1933 | A |
2074759 | Richards | Mar 1937 | A |
2283225 | Parsek | May 1942 | A |
2510178 | James | Jun 1950 | A |
2532586 | Wickwire | Dec 1950 | A |
2558614 | Jewell, Jr. | Jun 1951 | A |
3042435 | Wieseler et al. | Jul 1962 | A |
3285209 | Pace | Nov 1966 | A |
3806172 | Maze | Apr 1974 | A |
3888527 | Haisler | Jun 1975 | A |
3976315 | Braun | Aug 1976 | A |
3982800 | Gorton et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4061371 | Prather et al. | Dec 1977 | A |
4190379 | Toro Sosa et al. | Feb 1980 | A |
4229060 | Brownlee et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4392628 | Hadfield et al. | Jul 1983 | A |
4418970 | Hyder et al. | Dec 1983 | A |
4433885 | Baker | Feb 1984 | A |
4440459 | Hallgren | Apr 1984 | A |
4549727 | Kozar | Oct 1985 | A |
4610492 | Molander et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4635976 | Sigler | Jan 1987 | A |
4715629 | Robinson | Dec 1987 | A |
4796542 | Lee | Jan 1989 | A |
4930819 | Sharp et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
5016926 | Sharp et al. | May 1991 | A |
5114194 | Toifl et al. | May 1992 | A |
5475945 | Baker | Dec 1995 | A |
5529352 | Chin | Jun 1996 | A |
5711554 | Brown et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5785363 | Stopfer et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
6010168 | Johnson | Jan 2000 | A |
6017108 | Domenig | Jan 2000 | A |
6149208 | Jubinville | Nov 2000 | A |
6149209 | Barton | Nov 2000 | A |
6422618 | Guldner et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
7017958 | Bowers | Mar 2006 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050099103 A1 | May 2005 | US |