This invention relates to a cabinet with shelves that can be pulled out of a containment space and positioned outside the cabinet and vice versa can be put back in it. A pull-out mechanism is also part of the invention.
When constructing furniture and in particular corner cabinets, which may have a modular structure, a known method for solving the problem of poor access to the inner compartment of the furniture through its door is to make the shelves such that they can be pulled out for use and then put back in.
In fact, that allows the user to access and use the shelf in total comfort, without encountering any obstacles, and then put the shelf, along with the objects supported, back in the containment space inside the piece of furniture when he or she has finished handling the objects.
The movements of pulling out and putting back in the shelf through the access opening of the piece of furniture affect both the shape of the outline of the shelf and the trajectory that the shelf has to follow in order to: come out of the containment space of the piece of furniture, reach the outside of the piece of furniture, and go back into it during the reverse movement.
The trajectory and the shape are interdependent, since they affect each other. In fact, the trajectory influences the shape of the shelf and the extent of its usable surface, intended to support the objects inside a containment cabinet.
In terms of shape, semi-circular shelves have proved able to provide a satisfactory compromise between usable surface and easy transit without obstacles through the access opening of the piece of furniture.
In fact, the substantially semi-circular shape makes available a quite satisfactory loading surface, although smaller than the square and/or rectangular shapes of similar fixed shelves. As regards the ability of this shape to pass through the door, tests have shown that this can be achieved with a movement on a substantially sinusoidal trajectory, that allows the semi-circular shelf to get around first one and then the other of the two vertical edges that delimit the door.
A first embodiment of mechanisms suitable for giving the shelf this movement, known from document US2006/0012273, comprises a supporting column with a vertical axis of rotation that is positioned inside the containment space of the piece of furniture and behind one of the posts of the door, and a hinge with vertical axis supported behind the other post by one side of the piece of furniture. Projecting horizontally from the column and from the hinge cantilever-style there are two arms that can rotate independently and oscillate angularly about the respective vertical axes of rotation. The two arms in combination support the shelf at two separate points of it. By rotation of the two arms in opposite directions about the column and the hinge, the semi-circular shelf can be practically completely pulled out of the containment space of the piece of furniture, and vice versa put back into it with inverted movements.
Another solution described and illustrated by document EP 2415370 again comprises a column positioned inside the containment compartment, supporting cantilever-style an “L”-shaped bracket, that is horizontally rotatable about the column, and that sustains a curved guide on which a trolley is mounted, in turn supporting the shelf. Rotation of the “L”-shaped bracket about the column, appropriately followed by translation of the trolley along the guide, allows the shelf to gradually travel along the trajectory, being oriented along it in such a way that it can come out through the door, to the outside of the containment space of the piece of furniture and then be put back into it with a reverse movement.
The fundamental disadvantage of prior art solutions is that they need the vertical supporting column of the mechanism inside the piece of furniture.
That component involves several disadvantages.
In fact, first, it takes up valuable shelf space compared with the total usable space which would otherwise be provided inside the piece of furniture by a fixed shelf. Second, it is not aesthetically pleasing, above all when the structure of the piece of furniture is such that it does not have a door post with a vertical member behind which the column can be concealed.
Another disadvantage is the fact that the mechanism for moving the shelf has quite large dimensions in plan view inside the containment compartment of the piece of furniture. In fact, it covers practically the entire horizontal dimensions of the door opening, extending from one of its doorposts to the other.
A further disadvantage of the prior art solutions is the fact that when fully pulled out the semi-circular shelf has a more or less oblique positioning relative to its main axes, meaning relatively large dimensions in front of and outside the cabinet. Therefore, in front of the cabinet there has to be enough free space to allow the progress of the shelf movement.
A prior art technical solution proposed by the same Applicant and described in document IT 102016000128318 overcomes the above-mentioned disadvantages with a solution having a shelf having an essentially sinusoidal, two-lobe shape, basically defined by two segments which are substantially semi-circular in opposite directions, which are cut at the opposite ends of the shelf by two substantially straight stretches roughly parallel with a pair of vertical walls of the cabinet. The pull-out shelf is moved by a shelf movement control mechanism which basically comprises two movable sliders and two tracks, the sliders one at a time cyclically coming out of and going back into the tracks according to a suitable sequence of movements.
That solution brilliantly got around the disadvantages of the prior art. However, it has aspects which can potentially be improved upon, which are a specific technical purpose of this invention.
Within the scope of that technical purpose a first aim of the invention therefore relates to the search for a shelf shape which—although subject to the limitations related to the kinematics of coming out of and going back into the containment space—has a larger usable surface than the previous prior art solutions, the dimensions of the containment space of a cabinet of preset dimensions, intended to receive the movable shelf, being equal.
A second aim of the invention is to devise a structure of the shelf movement control means which is simpler and less expensive to make, and which is more mechanically reliable, guaranteeing a long product working life. According to the invention, those results are achieved by means of a cabinet equipped with pull-out shelves and a pull-out mechanism, whose technical features are described in one or more of the appended claims.
The advantages of the invention are more apparent in the detailed description which follows, with reference to the accompanying drawings which illustrate an example, non-limiting embodiment of the invention, in which:
With reference to the figures of the accompanying drawings, in
The shelves 9 can be pulled out of the containment space 2 through an access opening 3, to be positioned outside the cabinet 1, in a location near a user of the cabinet 1 where access to the usable surface of the shelf 9 is more convenient, and vice versa, can be put back into the containment space 2 of the cabinet 1 when operations are complete.
More particularly,
The shelf 9 has end edges 9e; 9f, 9g, one 9e of which is basically straight, the other in contrast being multi-sided, composed of at least two consecutive straight sides 9f, 9g.
In the figures reference will be made to a cabinet 1 layout having only one shelf 9. That is purely to keep the description simple, it being obvious that the cabinet 1 may be equipped with a more or less numerous set of shelves 9, stacked vertically and appropriately spaced from each other.
Regarding the access opening 3 to the containment space 2, hereinafter in the description generic reference will be made to a door opening, it being understood that—as will be clarified below—the physical presence or absence of a door is of no importance to the invention described.
That mechanism 4 basically comprises (
The arms 5 and 6 are rotatable together, in a horizontal plane, about a vertical line V of free movement, allowed by respective fixed cylindrical hinges 23 and 22, constraining the arms 6 and 7 and supported by an anchoring member 21 that anchors the mechanism 4 to the side 7 of the cabinet 1.
More particularly, the first arm 5 comprises a monolithic tubular rod, which at its opposite ends is connected: on one side to the fixed hinge 23; and which on the opposite side sustains the shelf 9.
In contrast, the second arm 6 has a composite, articulated structure, in the horizontal plane, comprising two straight segments 10, 11 that converge and are joined to each other at an interposed articulated joint 12. One end of the first segment 10 is rotatably interconnected to one 22 of the two fixed cylindrical hinges of the anchoring member 21. In contrast, the free end of the second segment 11 supports the other seat 8 for the corresponding pin 25 of the shelf 9.
Operatively positioned between the first arm 5 and the second arm 6, the mechanism 4 comprises control and guiding means 13 for controlling and guiding the synchronised coordinated movement of the two arms 5 and 6 and of the pull-out shelf 9.
Thanks to those control and guiding means 13, the shelf is movable horizontally and along a translating trajectory. Moreover, it has an angularly variable positioning in terms of its orientation about the vertical line V, which allows the above-mentioned shelf 9 to pass without interference through the access opening 3 to the containment space 2 of the cabinet 1.
More particularly,
In the track 16 the slider 14 is constantly engaged and constrained, with relative rotating and translating freedom of movement.
As is clearly shown in
In use, as may be inferred by comparing
During the return stroke, with which the slider 14 travels along the track 16 again with a backward motion, the rotating and translating motion of the shelf 9 is inverted and the shelf 9 goes back into the containment space 2 of the cabinet 1.
In other words, starting from the positioning shown in
During continuation of the motion, the shelf 9 itself begins to rotate in the opposite direction to previously, adopting the anti-clockwise direction clearly visible in a comparison of
In that final configuration the mechanism 4 has the first arm 5 substantially in contact against the side 7 of the cabinet 1, whilst the jointed second arm 6 is in a condition close to having its component segments 10 and 11 orthogonal to each other.
A comparison of
It should be noticed, from
In this state, a benefit is obtained from the dual advantage of allowing the user to have full access to the lobe 9b, or to the entire usable surface of the shelf 9, but without having to pay the price of excessive dimensions outside the containment compartment 2, since the extent of the part of the shelf 9 actually projecting outside the cabinet 1 remains less than that of the whole surface of the shelf 9. This is undoubtedly an advantage for modern living spaces which are known to be smaller than those in the past.
However, a comparison of
Therefore, the invention fully achieves the results of the aims previously indicated, bringing multiple advantages such as: a simplified mechanical design, less expensive to produce and highly reliable and long-lasting even with intensive use; reduced dimensions outside the cabinet, but without in any way limiting user access to the whole usable surface of the shelf;
and, all conditions being equal, also providing an extent of the usable surface which is greater than that permitted by similar applications, or a better ratio between the actual usable surface of the pull-out shelf and the theoretical surface of a corresponding, hypothetical, fixed shelf of the receiving cabinet 1. The following are other, equally important advantages of the invention.
The mechanism 4 can be prepared as a modular assembly “kit”, which can be mounted quickly and easily, as a whole, on the side 7 of an existing cabinet 1, meaning that a cabinet can be retrofitted with the mechanism in order to accept a movable shelf 9.
The mechanism 4 is also highly versatile in terms of use, with the possibility of specialising depending on the various geometries of the receiving cabinets 1 practically by simply customising the plate 20 with the related track 16.
Moreover, again with reference to versatile use, considering that the mechanism and the related shelf 9 movement induced are irrespective of the width of the access opening 3 of the piece of furniture, it should be noticed that the same mechanism 4 is practically usable for almost the whole range of standard furniture in which, as is known, the width of the access opening usually varies from 450 to 600 mm.
In other words, the horizontal trajectory (which remains invariable) being equal, and the dimensions of the mechanism being equal, in order to switch from one size of furniture to another, only the shape of the shelf 9 needs to be changed.
The invention described above is susceptible of evident industrial application. It may also be modified and adapted in several ways without thereby departing from the scope of the following claims.
Moreover, all details of the invention may be substituted by technically equivalent elements.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
102017000069780 | Jun 2017 | IT | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/IT2018/050108 | 6/18/2018 | WO | 00 |