There are several challenges associated with the deployment of fiber-optic cable in water. To prevent wasteful, unrestrained payout of the cable, especially in deep water, tension is typically applied to the cable by way of capstans or hand tension. These previous techniques have draw-backs, however, such as cable damage in the event of a cable snag, limited sequential in-line sensor deployment capability, and lack of precision/control. A need exists for a system with improved functional capability and greater control of optical-cable deployment.
a shows a schematic of a ship equipped with the presently disclosed system.
b shows a side view of a cable brake system.
a and 1b show a cable brake system 10 for deployments of light cable 12, e.g. fiber optic cable, into water. The cable brake system 10 has the ability to control and monitor the tension, deployment speed, and the amount/length of cable 12 that has been deployed off of a ship 14. The cable brake system 10 comprises a plurality of brake sub-assemblies 16, and a sensor assembly 18. The brake sub-assemblies 16 and the sensor assembly 18 are mounted to a frame 20, which may be mounted to the deck of the ship 14. The brake sub-assemblies 16 may be positioned on the frame 20 to produce a serpentine cable path when activated. Both the braking force and the position of the brake sub-assemblies 16 are adjustable so that the amount of tension on the cable 12 may be regulated to correspond with the depth of the water, the speed of the ship 14 and the amount of slack desired. Although
The cable 12 may be stored in cable packs 22 and on a larger spool 24. Cable packs 22 may be formed by winding cable 12 within a binder material (e.g. glue) that, when cured, holds the cable 12 in-place within the cable packs 22. Several wraps of the cable 12 are also wound on to the spool 24, which has an internal spool brake 26 (shown in a cutaway section of the spool 24 in
The frame 20 can be constructed of structural members necessary to support cable packs 22, in-line sensors 30, brake sub-assemblies 16, and the over-boarding guides 32. Space frame construction of the frame 20 may be employed to lower the weight of the cable brake system 10, while allowing ample load-bearing capacity and mounting options for the mechanical interface to the ship 14's deck. Each element of the cable brake system 10 may be constructed using components that resist corrosion in a marine environment. Cable rollers 34 may be positioned at the aft end of the over-boarding guides 32 (as shown in
At specified intervals during a cable deployment, an in-line sensor 30 can be deployed by momentarily opening the serpentine brake arrangement, previously described, and passing the in-line sensor 30. Once the in-line sensor 30 has passed, the serpentine cable-path is re-established and braking is activated again. This is accomplished by a control system, which commands the actuators 36, which move the brake sub-assemblies 16. In one example embodiment, the in-line sensor may be a cylindrical repeater/amplifier with an approximate 20-inch diameter. It is to be understood that the in-line sensor 30 is not limited to cylinders, but may be any size or shape. The in-line sensor 30 can be deployed in-line/mid-span of the cable 12 being deployed by temporarily deactivating the brake sub-assemblies 16 and allowing the in-line sensor 30 to be deployed through the over-boarding guides 32. This function may be accomplished by a processor 62, described below.
The processor 62 conducts data acquisition and is also capable of applying deployment logic to make braking decisions. The processor 62 can be programmed to modulate the braking force at any or all of the brake sub-assemblies 16 by controlling the brake calipers 48 on the brake rotors 46. Additionally, the processor 62 can also activate or deactivate the brake system 10 by controlling the actuators 36 and the sensor actuator 54. With comprehensive programming (software), the processor 62 could manage the entire test sequence for a cable deployment mission. Lab-view™ software is a suitable example of software that may be used with the processor 62 to perform the above-described operations. The brake system 10 can automatically provide more tension during payout in deeper water (where a run-away deployment condition could occur if the cable 12 is not restrained) and less tension in shallow water (where there is a lower likelihood of the run-away condition). Upper limit thresholds for tension could also be set to avoid cable damage if the cable 12 was inadvertently snagged or pulled during the deployment.
The previous description of the disclosed functions is provided to enable any person skilled in the development process for a similar concept to make or use the present inventive subject matter. Various modifications to these functions will be readily apparent and the generic principles defined herein may be applied to additional functions without departing from the spirit or scope of the inventive subject matter. For example, one or more of the brake system functions can be rearranged and/or combined, or additional functional elements may be added. Thus, the present inventive subject matter is not intended to be limited to the set of functions shown herein but is to be accorded the widest scope consistent with the principles and novel features disclosed herein.
It will be understood that many additional changes in the details, materials, steps and arrangement of parts, which have been herein described and illustrated to explain the nature of the invention, may be made by those skilled in the art within the principal and scope of the invention as expressed in the appended claims.
This invention (Navy Case No. 96,881) is assigned to the United States Government and is available for licensing for commercial purposes. Licensing and technical inquiries may be directed to the Office of Research and Technical Applications, Space and Naval Warfare Systems Center, San Diego, Code 2112, San Diego, Calif., 92152; voice 619-553-2778; email T2@spawar.navy.mil.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3934647 | Bokenkamp | Jan 1976 | A |
4230421 | Springett et al. | Oct 1980 | A |
4269540 | Uyeda et al. | May 1981 | A |
4340322 | Springett et al. | Jul 1982 | A |
4345855 | Uyeda et al. | Aug 1982 | A |
4358834 | Swenson | Nov 1982 | A |
5284323 | Pawkett | Feb 1994 | A |
5595178 | Voss et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5692509 | Voss et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6070857 | Dragsund et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6116345 | Fontana et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6276454 | Fontana et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6328502 | Hickey et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6484920 | Selcer | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6588980 | Worman et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6702221 | Haber et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6752384 | Matheson | Jun 2004 | B2 |
7389973 | Chou et al. | Jun 2008 | B1 |
20030150201 | Matheson | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20050029476 | Biester et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |