The invention relates to fiber optic devices and in particular to a fiber optical Distributed Acoustic Sensing (DAS) assembly that is adapted to sense the magnitude and direction of acoustic signals, and particularly those signals that are travelling at an angle or substantially perpendicular to the device.
Various attempts have been made to provide sensing capabilities in the context of petroleum exploration, production, and monitoring, with varying degrees of success. Recently, these attempts have included the use of fiber optic cables to detect acoustic energy. Because the cables typically comprise optically conducting fiber containing a plurality of backscattering inhomogeneities along the length of the fiber, such systems allow the distributed measurement of optical path length changes along an optical fiber by measuring backscattered light from a laser pulse input into the fiber. Because they allow distributed sensing, such systems may be referred to as “distributed acoustic sensing” or “DAS” systems. One use of DAS systems is in seismic applications, in which seismic sources at known locations transmit acoustic signals into the formation, and/or passive seismic sources emit acoustic energy. The signals are received at seismic sensors after passing through and/or reflecting through the formation. The received signals can be processed to give information about the formation through which they passed. This technology can be used to record a variety of seismic information. Another application is in the field of in-well applications and acoustic fluid monitoring.
DAS systems typically detect backscattering of short (1-10 meter) laser pulses from impurities or inhomogeneities in the optical fiber. If fiber is deformed by an incident seismic wave then 1) the distance between impurities changes and 2) the speed of the laser pulses changes. Both of these effects influence the backscattering process. By observing changes in the backscattered signal it is possible to reconstruct the seismic wave amplitude. The first of the above effects appears only if the fiber is stretched or compressed axially. The second effect is present in case of axial as well as radial fiber deformations. The second effect is, however, several times weaker than the first. Moreover, radial deformations of the fiber are significantly damped by materials surrounding the fiber. As a result, a conventional DAS system with a straight fiber is mainly sensitive to seismic waves polarized along the cable axis, such as compression (P) waves propagating along the cable or shear (S) waves propagating perpendicular to the cable. The strength of the signal varies approximately as cos3 θ, where θ is the angle between the fiber axis and the direction of wave propagation (for P waves). Thus, while there exists a variety of commercially available DAS systems that have varying sensitivity, dynamic range, spatial resolution, linearity, etc., all of these systems are primarily sensitive to axial strain. Acoustic signals travelling normal to the fiber axis may sometimes be referred to as “broadside” signals and, for P waves, result in radial strain on the fiber. Thus, as the angle between direction of travel of the acoustic signal and the fiber axis approaches 90°, DAS cables become much less sensitive to the signal and may even fail to detect it. The Appendix attached hereto provides further discussion of the mathematics of sinusoidal fibers.
Hence, it is desirable to provide an improved cable that is more sensitive to signals travelling normal to its axis and enables distinguishing radial strain from the axial strain. Sensitivity to broadside waves is particularly important for seismic or microseismic applications, with cables on the surface or downhole. In addition to broadside sensitivity, it is also desirable to provide three-component (3C) sensing, from which the direction of travel of the sensed signal can be determined.
In accordance with preferred embodiments of the invention there is provided a distributed fiber optic cable comprising an elongate body and a first optical fiber longitudinally housed in the body, wherein the fiber describes a sinusoid having an amplitude and a first wavelength along the length of the body and wherein the sinusoid rotates along the length of the body so as to describe a twisted sinusoid having a twist wavelength.
The cable may provide a plurality of sensing channels and the first wavelength may be a function of a desired channel length. The first wavelength may also be a function of the amplitude.
The first wavelength may be between 0.001 and 0.1 m, between 0.005 and 0.1 m, or more preferably between 0.005 and 0.05 m. The twist wavelength may be between 1 m and 50 m, between 2 m and 20 m, or more preferably approximately 10 m.
The fiber optic cable may define a helix.
The amplitude may be a function of the thickness of the body.
The invention further provides a method for sensing an acoustic wave, comprising a) providing a set of signals collected from a distributed fiber optic cable comprising an elongate body and a first optical fiber longitudinally housed in said body, wherein the fiber describes a sinusoid having an amplitude and a first wavelength along the length of the body and wherein the sinusoid rotates along the length of the body so as to describe a twisted sinusoid having a twist wavelength, b) processing the signals so as to divide the fiber in each twist wavelength of cable into a predetermined number of channels, c) measuring the amplitudes in each channel and calculating the maximum and minimum amplitude in a preselected length of cable, and d) using the calculated maximum and minimum for the preselected length of cable to determine the amplitude and direction of the wave at the preselected length of cable.
The preselected length of cable in step c) may be equal to one-half of the twist wavelength. The twist wavelength may be between 1 m and 50 m and the predetermined number of channels may be 10. The twist wavelength is between 2 m and 20 m. More preferably, the twist wavelength is 10 m and the preselected length of cable in step c) is 5 m.
For a more detailed understanding of the invention, reference is made to the accompanying Figures wherein:
An initial analysis starts with a configuration in which three sinusoidal fibers lie in the three longitudinal surfaces of a triangular prism as shown below. All three fibers are assumed to have the same shape.
A coordinate system (x, y, z) is chosen such that the z axis is directed along the prism, and x- and y-axes lie in its cross-section. One of the prism sides lies in the (x, z) plane, as illustrated in
Generally speaking, the strain tensor ejk has 6 independent components. Using three fibers one can do only 3 independent measurements. These 3 measurements are not sufficient to deduce 6 unknown components of the strain tensor.
One way to obtain sufficient data may be to combine triangular bodies to form a larger body, as shown in
However, the strain tensor can be determined uniquely if with particular types of elastic deformations are assumed. In most geophysical application one measures primary seismic waves. The waves coming from distant targets can be approximately considered as plane waves.
Transformation of the Strain Sensor
Suppose that a plane primary wave propagates along the ζ-axis. Orientation of the ζ-axis with respect to the prism coordinate system can be specified by two angles, θ and ϕ, as is shown in
In what follows that eζζ is positive and it refers to the maximum strain in the wave. Equation (2) shows that the strain tensor in plane primary waves is fully determined by three variables: eζζ, θ, and φ, that can be reconstructed from three independent measurements. Transition between the coordinate systems (x′, y′, z) and (x, y, z) is given by the equations
x′=x cos ψ+y sin ψ, y′=−x sin ψ+y cos ψ. (3)
Using Eq. (3) and Eq. (1), gives
ex′x′=cos2 ψexx+2 sin ψ cos ψexy+sin2 ψeyy. (4)
The expression for ex″x″ is obtained by making the replacement ψ→π−ψ is Eq. (4),
ex″x″=cos2 ψexx−2 sin ψ cos ψexy+sin2 ψeyy. (5)
Twisted Sinusoid
Another approach is to use a single twisted strip, so that s orientation angle ψ varies with z. The signal measured by this strip is equal to
S(ψ)=α(cos2 ψexx+2 sin ψ cos ψexy+sin2 ψeyy)+ezz. (18)
Taking the derivative of S with respect to angle ψ, gives
Using Eq. (2) to calculate components of the strain tensor, reduces Eq. (19) to
The signal has extrema at the points where dS/dz=0, i.e. at
ψ=ϕ and ψ=ϕ±(π/2)
It is straightforward to check that the signal has a maximum at ψ=ϕ and a minimum at ψ=ϕ±(π/2). The correspondent values of the signal are equal to
Smax=eζζ(α sin2 θ+cos2 θ), Smin=eζζ cos2 θ. (23)
From Eq. 23 it follows that
Solving Eq. 24 and substituting the result into Eq. 23 allows one to reconstruct eζζ.
A hypothetical cable has a radius for outer fibers with a 30-degree wrapping angle of 17.4 mm. A flat strip with a sinusoidal fiber described in the plane of the strip by:
y(x)=a·sin(bx)=α·sin(φ)
with x=the inline distance along the strip. For a strip length of x=2π/b, the length of the fiber equals
E is a complete elliptic integral of the second kind, which can be expressed as a power series.
Continuing the hypothetical, a channel is required every 2 m along the cable, while the channel length measured along the fiber is 8 m. Using a=0.0174 m, it can be calculated that 343.5 sinusoids need to be fitted into 2 m, corresponding to a wavelength λ1=0.0183 m.
A flat strip is only sensitive in the x- and y-directions, but by twisting the strip it can be made sensitive to all 3 directions.
Assuming that the strip is twisted by π radians over a distance λ2=10 m, within each 10 m there will be 10 m/2 m=5 measurements, each with a different rotation along the cable axis, and each stepping on average by 180/5=36 degrees.
It may further be assumed that over the distance λ2 the incident seismic wave is approximately a plane wave. For the highest frequencies in the groundroll this assumption may not be optimal, but otherwise it is reasonable.
As set out in detail above, by measuring the amplitudes over these 5 channels per 10 m and determining (e.g. by interpolation) the maximum and minimum amplitudes, it is possible to determine all 3 components of a wavefield using a single fiber. Reliability of the amplitudes measurements is essential in this process.
There is a risk that the fiber may bend instead of being compressed in the desired geometry, i.e. with an amplitude in the strip of 1.74 cm and a sinusoid length of 1.83 cm. Since at least 5 sample points per 10 m are required, (the maximum station spacing assuming plane waves), a maximum of 2 m are available for the channel spacing along the cable. If it were possible to shift the channels between time samples by a fraction of a m, it would be possible to use large channel spacings along the cable, resulting in longer sinusoid lengths and reduced risk of bending of the fiber.
In preferred embodiments, the cable described herein is used on the earth's surface for detecting/monitoring seismic signals travelling through the subsurface. Thus, it may be used in conjunction with a ground anchor such as is known in the art. Similarly, the cable may be used in one or more boreholes to for detecting/monitoring detect seismic signals travelling through the subsurface.
In addition to the various applications mentioned above, the cables described herein can be used as towed streamer cables or deployed on the seabed (OBC).
The embodiments described herein can be used advantageously alone or in combination with each other and/or with other fiber optic concepts. The methods and apparatus described herein can be used to measure arrival times and waveforms of acoustic signals and in particular broadside acoustic waves. Arrival times and waveforms give information about the formation and can be used in various seismic techniques.
In still other applications, the methods and apparatus described herein can be used to detect microseisms and the data collected using the present invention, including broadside wave signals, can be used in microseismic localization. In these embodiments, the data are used to generate coordinates of a microseism. In still other applications, ability of the present systems to detect broadside waves and axial waves distinguishably can be used in various DAS applications, including but not limited to intruder detection, monitoring of traffic, pipelines, or other environments, and monitoring of various conditions in a borehole, including fluid inflow.
While preferred embodiments have been disclosed and described, it will be understood that various modifications can be made thereto without departing from the scope of the invention as set out in the claims that follow.
This is a Divisional application of U.S. application Ser. No. 14/418,393, filed Jan. 29, 2015, which is a National Stage (§ 371) application of PCT/US2013/052647, filed Jul. 30, 2013, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/678,482, filed Aug. 1, 2012. This case is also related to U.S. application Ser. No. 61/576,192, filed Dec. 15, 2011, and entitled “Detecting Broadside Acoustic Signals with a Fiber Optical Distributed Acoustic Sensing (Das) Assembly,” which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4141623 | Dubost et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4524436 | Hall et al. | Jun 1985 | A |
4568408 | Schmadel et al. | Feb 1986 | A |
4634852 | Shaw | Jan 1987 | A |
5504720 | Meyer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5696628 | Sutton et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
6004639 | Quigley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6211964 | Luscombe et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6269198 | Hodgson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6281489 | Tubel et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6510103 | Knudsen et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6588266 | Tubel et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6601671 | Zhao et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6840114 | Niezgorski et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6853780 | Brandi et al. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
6874361 | Meltz et al. | Apr 2005 | B1 |
7201221 | Tubel et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7224872 | Goldner et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
7284903 | Hartog | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7315666 | Van Der Spek | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7369716 | Berg et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7668411 | Davies et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
7740064 | McCoy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7946341 | Hartog et al. | May 2011 | B2 |
7954560 | Mathiszik et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
8131121 | Huffman | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8505625 | Ravi et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8848485 | Bostick | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8924158 | Kragh et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
9080949 | Mestayer et al. | Jul 2015 | B2 |
9250120 | Smith et al. | Feb 2016 | B2 |
9766119 | Den Boer et al. | Sep 2017 | B2 |
20040043501 | Means et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20050115741 | Terry et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20060233482 | Rambow | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20090132183 | Hartog et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090219171 | Vigneaux | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20100107754 | Hartog et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100207019 | Hartog et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100254650 | Rambow | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100315630 | Ramos et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110044574 | Strong | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110069302 | Hill et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110088462 | Samson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110088910 | McCann et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110149688 | Hill et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110185815 | McCann | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110216996 | Rogers | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110292763 | Coates et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110320147 | Brady et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120017687 | Davis et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120018149 | Fidan et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120020184 | Wilson et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120057432 | Hill et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120111104 | Taverner et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120287749 | Kutlik et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130242698 | McEwen-King et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2009158630 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2010010318 | Jan 2010 | WO |
2010034986 | Apr 2010 | WO |
2010136810 | Dec 2010 | WO |
2011010110 | Jan 2011 | WO |
2011039501 | Apr 2011 | WO |
2011058312 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058313 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058314 | May 2011 | WO |
2011058322 | May 2011 | WO |
2011067554 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011076850 | Jun 2011 | WO |
2011141537 | Nov 2011 | WO |
2011148128 | Dec 2011 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Alexis Méndez et al., Overview of fiber optic sensors for NDT applications, Oct. 2007, IV NDT Panamerican Conference Buenos Aires, pp. 1-11 (Year: 2007). |
Leno S. Pedrotti, Basic Geometrical Optics, In Fundamentals of Photonics, Module 1. 3, pp. 73-116, https://doi.org/10.1117/3.784938.ch3 (Year: 2008). |
Unknown, Fiber-Optic Sensing Technologies, 2012, Pinnacle A Haliburton Service, Haliburton, pp. 1-12 (Year: 2012). |
Xin Liu et al., Distributed Fiber-Optic Sensors for Vibration Detection, 2016, Sensors, 16, 1164, pp. 1-31 (Year: 2016). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2013/052647, dated Jan. 2, 2014, 6 pages. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion received for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/US2012/069464, dated Mar. 28, 2013, 12 pages. |
Barrias et al., “A Review of Distributed Optical Fiber Sensors for Civil Engineering Applications”, vol. 16, Issue No. 5, Sensors, May 23, 2016, 35 pages. |
“Fiber Optic Sensor Technology”, Luna Innovations, Products and Services, Jun. 2015, Web link—www.AutomotiveTestingTechnologyInternational.com, 2 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180299322 A1 | Oct 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61678482 | Aug 2012 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 14418393 | US | |
Child | 16014670 | US |