1. Field of the Invention
This invention pertains, in general, to the field of retractable roofs for large structures, such as athletic stadiums. More specifically, the invention relates to an improved roof assembly that is optimal in terms of weight and bulk, that quickly adapts to maintain system alignment and balance during operation, that possesses fail-safe redundancy and that is economical to construct and to operate in comparison to conventional convertible stadium designs.
2. Description of the Related Technology
It is now common for athletic stadiums to be constructed with retractable roofs, because this type of construction offers spectators the pleasure of being outdoors on nice days, while providing shelter when necessary against extreme temperatures and inclement weather conditions. A retractable roof also can make possible the growth of natural grass within the stadium, which is often felt to be desirable in professional and major collegiate athletics.
A number of factors must be taken into account in the design of a stadium that has a retractable roof. For instance, the forces created by the exertion of natural forces such as wind, rain, snow and even earthquakes on such a large structure can be enormous, and the roof, the underlying stadium structure and the transport mechanism that is used to guide and move the roof between its retracted and operational positions must be engineered to withstand the worst possible confluence of such forces. Wind forces, for example, not only can impart tremendous displacement and lifting forces to a movable roof component, they can create potentially destructive vibration as well.
In addition, for reasons that are both aesthetic and practical, it is desirable to make the structural elements of the roof and the transport mechanism as unobtrusive and as space-efficient as possible. It is also desirable to make the roof structure and the transport mechanism as lightweight as possible, both to minimize the amount of energy that is necessary to open and close the roof structure and to minimize the need for additional structural reinforcement in the roof structure and in the underlying stadium structure.
Movable roof panels for large structures such as stadiums are still inevitably quite large and heavy and therefore present unique engineering challenges that are quite different than those that are faced by designers of smaller systems. For example, roof panels that are hundreds of feet in dimension undergo significant thermal expansion and contraction both on a macroscopic level as a result of atmospheric temperature conditions and on a more local level as a result of sunlight gradients, convection within and outside the stadium and so forth. For roof panels that are mounted for movement on trolleys or bearings that are significant distances from each other, thermal expansion and contraction present a significant engineering problem that is not faced by designers of smaller systems. Settling and shifting of the stadium and its foundation over time can also contribute to misalignment of large movable systems within the stadium such as roof panels. Maintaining the alignment of such systems during operation and while the systems are at rest is also an important consideration and presents challenges that are not present in smaller scale systems, especially when considered in conjunction with the external forces (wind shear, etc.) to which stadium roof panels are regularly subjected. It is desirable, of course, to minimize the mass and the weight of the bearing structure and the drive train that is used to support, reinforce and to move the movable roof panels between the opening and closed positions.
A need exists for an improved convertible stadium that is optimal in terms of weight and bulk, that quickly adapts to maintain system alignment and balance during operation, that possesses fail-safe redundancy and that is economical to construct and to operate in comparison to conventional convertible stadium designs.
It is therefore an object of the invention to provide an improved convertible stadium that is optimal in terms of weight and bulk, that quickly adapts to maintain system alignment and balance during operation, that possesses fail-safe redundancy and that is economical to construct and to operate in comparison to conventional convertible stadium designs.
In order to achieve the above and other objects of the invention, a movable roof system according to a first aspect of the invention includes a stationary roof structure; a large, heavy roof panel mounted for movement with respect to the roof structure; a cable drum mounted for movement with the roof panel; and a cable, the cable being secured to the stationary roof structure and being payable from the cable drum.
According to a second aspect of the invention, a convertible stadium, includes a playing field; a seating area; a stationary roof structure; a large, heavy roof panel mounted for movement with respect to said stationary roof structure; a plurality of cable drums, each of the cable drums being mounted for movement together with the roof panel, wherein each of the cable drums has at least one cable wound thereabout, the cable being secured to the stationary roof structure and being payable from the respective cable drum.
According to a third aspect of the invention, an anemometer includes an impeller; a flag mounted for movement with the impeller; light path means defining a light path, said light path means comprising an optical fiber and a space through which said flag is adapted to periodically travel, and analyzing means for analyzing light received from said light path means.
These and various other advantages and features of novelty that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings which form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference numerals designate corresponding structure throughout the views, and referring in particular to
Convertible stadium 10 further preferably includes stationary roof structure 16, a first movable roof panel 18 and a second movable roof panel 20. The first and second movable roof panels 18, 20 are large, relatively heavy structures in engineering terms, having a length and a width of at least 100 feet in each dimension and a weight of at least 100 tons. Preferably, both the first and second movable roof panels 18, 20 are constructed as a lenticular truss as taught in U.S. Pat. No. 4,789,360 to Silberman et al., the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
As is shown in
The first and second movable roof panels 18, 20 are both mounted for movement along the path with respect to the stationary roof structure 16 by means of first and second parallel guide track assemblies 22, 24 that are provided at opposite lateral sides of the top of the stationary roof structure 16. Referring to
A carrier assembly 34 is mounted to travel along the path on each rail member 36. Carrier assembly 34 includes a first carrier unit 38, a second carrier unit 40, a third carrier unit 42 and a fourth carrier unit 44. A first linkage assembly 46, a second linkage assembly 48 and a third linkage assembly 50 are provided to securely link the carrier units 38, 40, 42, 44 to each other. The carrier units 38, 40, 42, 44 are secured to the lenticular roof panel 64 via linkages including linear bearings 66, 68, as is best shown in
Referring again to
As is best shown in
The roof is preferably designed to be operational with up to one quarter of its motors failing, and to be stoppable with as many as nine out of 16 brakes failing. Each motor brake is equipped with a brake switch, a mechanically activated switch that changes state according to the position of the brake discs. This switch is monitored by the central control system and is used to report any mechanical failure of the brake to operate. The brake torque value or its ability to hold and stop the load is measured by briefly activating the motors against closed brakes and monitor the roof (via the absolute encoders mounted on each roof side) for any motion. Motion would indicate wear of the brake discs; the more motion or slip, the greater wear. This is used in the maintenance program to monitor brake wear and to signal a need for replacement.
Referring to
The application of VFD's allows movement of the equipment to be commenced at a very slow speed, as well as to permit eventual acceleration of the equipment up to twice the normal speed of a standard 3-phase motor, thereby completing the cycle time at a much faster speed than a conventional arrangement. The VFD with the application of the Programmable Logic Controller (PLC) can also react to the wind in and around the stadium. If it is found that the wind is of an excessive speed the VFD may be prevented from accelerating past a slower speed, thus protecting all of the machinery. This application of both the VFD and the PLC allows the mechanism to complete the opening cycle most of the time in half the speed of a conventional machine, while still maintaining the capability to slow down to 60 Hertz where it has its optimal torque during high wind conditions to maintain safety. This arrangement is a significant improvement over conventional drives.
One VFD for each quadrant will be designated as the lead or master (shown as V1, V2 in
Each movable roof panel 18, 20 will be equipped with its own programmable logic controller (PLC) 86, 88 that will work with the VFDs in that roof panel and control roof operation. In each drum group of four drums there are eight VFDs (16 motors). These 8 VFDs communicate with each other via a high-speed fiber-optic network and with the central roof control system via an industrial LAN. Each cable drum 60 will have an incremental encoder EI that will measure speed and direction of movement, as well as the incremental length of cable. Each roof quadrant will have an absolute encoder EA located on the lead carrier, which will track the respective roof panel's position on the rail, and will remember the position when the roof is powered down and back up again. Control system 84 will also preferably have a central controller 90 with an operator interface and that is in two way communication with each of the PLCs 86, 88. The PLC's 86, 88 control practically every aspect of operation of the opening and closing of the roof panels 18, 20, including operation of the rail clamps 96, the motors, the brakes and the monitoring of operating conditions. A sensor 126 is provided for enabling the PLC 86 to determine when the roof panel 18, 20 has reached the fully closed position, and a second sensor 128 is provided for enabling the PLC 86 to determine when the roof panel 18, 20 has reached the fully open position. Warning sirens and lights 122 are provided that are actuatable by the PLC to warn humans of dangerous or irregular conditions.
Another feature provided by the PLC, coupled to the VFD, is the ability for the operator to continuously monitor the motor voltage, the motor frequency, and the motor output torque. The motor thermostat TM for each motor is also in data communication with the PLC. This may permit estimation of the dynamic tension in each of the cables during operation. These figures are displayed on the operator's information screen and recorded continuously for historic reference and troubleshooting. These diagnostic features allow the operator confidence that the mechanism is functioning as intended and offer an early warning as soon as an inconsistency develops in the mechanism long before a serious failure would occur. The historical data logging is programmed to download through the internet on a high-speed communications link to a remote facility, thus enabling engineers at that facility to monitor all systems in the field to be sure they are working properly. The combination of these devices allows an unsophisticated owner with no engineering staff to operate highly technical equipment that heretofore could not be operated without a staff of engineers on-site, thereby significantly reducing the cost of ownership.
Each of the two sides of a stadium roof panel 18, 20 will preferably have its own local Emergency Stop (E-Stop) circuit 124 to cut off power to the drive systems and reset the motor brakes in case of an E-Stop condition. The control systems on the two roof sides are galvanically isolated from each other by a fiber-optic cable connecting the two data LANs. This is done for two reasons:
1. To limit the segment length of the data LAN (distance in a fiber-optic run is not counted, due to very small signal losses), and
2. To limit the component exposure in case of a lightning strike.
For the same reasons the two E-Stop circuits are preferably isolated by a fiber-optic connection. An E-Stop system consists of two redundant channels so that each E-Stop button has two contacts in the safety system. These channels are constantly monitored by a safety controller and a failure of either channel will result in an E-Stop condition. These two channels are carried between the two independent E-Stop systems as dual emitter-receiver fiber systems. If an E-Stop system is OK, it sends two independent light signals (different frequencies) through a single fiber to a pair of receivers on the other roof side. The two receivers each have an output contact which is part of the local E-Stop system. An identical, but opposite system, makes the second side part of the first side's E-Stop system. Thus any E-Stop trip will instantly cause a trip on both sides. This is important, since a fast stop on one side (caused by instant activation of motor brakes) and a slow stop on the other (by normal deceleration or a delayed fast stop commanded by the central system) could cause undue structural stress.
The installed roof will have an emergency stop system that will bypass the PLC's and VFDs and when activated, will disconnect all power to the motors and brakes, causing the failsafe, spring-set brakes to engage and stop the movable roof panel 18, 20 from moving.
Each quadrant will have one overspeed sensing system SO independent of the control system 84 that will stop the roof panel 18, 20 if it moves over the allowed speed. A disk with magnets embedded in the outer edge will be driven by a carrier wheel and will generate a pulse train as a drives past the sensor. If the pulse train goes above the allowed speed, power to the motors and brakes will be cut, causing the failsafe electric brakes to engage. Although the overspeed sensing system SO is independent of the control system 84 it still reports data to the responsible PLC for the particular roof panel 18, 20 to which it is attached.
Referring now to
Although the cable driving control system described herein has previously been described in connection with convertible stadiums, it should be understood that in alternative embodiments it could be used in any other large edifice in which a retractable roof panel could be employed.
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
This application claims priority under 35 USC §119(e) based on U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 60/659,792, filed Mar. 9, 2005, the entire disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference as if set forth fully herein.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 1559261 | Konsalik | Oct 1925 | A |
| 2052217 | Sibour et al. | Aug 1936 | A |
| 2603171 | Smith | Jul 1952 | A |
| 2642162 | Tobias | Jun 1953 | A |
| 2921592 | Mackey | Jan 1960 | A |
| 3009211 | Hansen et al. | Nov 1961 | A |
| 3135296 | Kelstrom et al. | Jun 1964 | A |
| 3213571 | Olson | Oct 1965 | A |
| 3261133 | Herr et al. | Jul 1966 | A |
| 3266328 | Rott | Aug 1966 | A |
| 3277619 | Miller et al. | Oct 1966 | A |
| 3288158 | Gugliotta | Nov 1966 | A |
| 3436132 | Wiesler | Apr 1969 | A |
| 3465483 | Miller | Sep 1969 | A |
| 3534511 | Cappella | Oct 1970 | A |
| 3579932 | Atkinson | May 1971 | A |
| 3608252 | Bisson | Sep 1971 | A |
| 3766691 | Ray | Oct 1973 | A |
| 4175361 | Kumode | Nov 1979 | A |
| 4177973 | Miller et al. | Dec 1979 | A |
| 4257199 | Kuboyama | Mar 1981 | A |
| 4347993 | Leonard | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4348833 | Nagoya | Sep 1982 | A |
| 4515416 | Teramachi | May 1985 | A |
| 4569164 | Dickson | Feb 1986 | A |
| 4581860 | Berger | Apr 1986 | A |
| 4587775 | Lewis et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4616451 | Glick | Oct 1986 | A |
| 4636962 | Broyden et al. | Jan 1987 | A |
| 4676033 | Allen et al. | Jun 1987 | A |
| 4682449 | Berger | Jul 1987 | A |
| 4706419 | Adachi et al. | Nov 1987 | A |
| 4716691 | Allen et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
| 4727688 | Kida et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
| 4738057 | Logan | Apr 1988 | A |
| 4751800 | Kida et al. | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4802314 | Schildge, Jr. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4804095 | Rohr et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4831792 | Berger | May 1989 | A |
| 4833837 | Bonneau | May 1989 | A |
| 4920707 | Moskuliuk et al. | May 1990 | A |
| 4936060 | Gelinas et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
| 4942698 | Kumagai | Jul 1990 | A |
| 4995203 | Brisbin et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5007214 | Itami et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5010695 | Schildge, Jr. | Apr 1991 | A |
| 5027565 | Sugizaki | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5035093 | Parazader et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
| 5058332 | Masuyama et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
| 5062243 | Kumagai | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5063730 | Muramoto et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5070659 | Brisbin et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
| 5103600 | Geiger et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
| 5115127 | Bobb et al. | May 1992 | A |
| 5117594 | Muramoto et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5167097 | Robbie et al. | Dec 1992 | A |
| 5187894 | Ripley, Sr. et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
| 5189851 | Omika et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5203125 | Sugizaki | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5257481 | Reppas et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5257485 | Kawaguchi et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5355641 | Levy | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5371983 | Kawaguchi et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5394659 | Kawaguchi et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5394660 | Haris | Mar 1995 | A |
| 5522192 | Frantl et al. | Jun 1996 | A |
| 5622013 | Ban et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
| 5653066 | Schildge, Jr. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5682711 | Warczak | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5746028 | DiBenedetto | May 1998 | A |
| 5778603 | Reppas | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5848499 | Schildge, Jr. | Dec 1998 | A |
| 5857294 | Castro | Jan 1999 | A |
| 5875281 | Thexton et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
| 5896708 | Doi et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
| 5904003 | Stephen | May 1999 | A |
| 5927022 | Hirakawa et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5983575 | Reppas | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6003269 | McRee | Dec 1999 | A |
| 6082054 | Silberman et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6145254 | Silva | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6367206 | Silberman et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
| 6385912 | Wessel et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
| 6415556 | Silberman et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
| 6698141 | Silberman et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6718696 | Silberman et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6754994 | Jahanpour | Jun 2004 | B2 |
| 6768321 | Wain et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6789360 | Silberman et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
| 6851227 | Schildge, Jr. | Feb 2005 | B1 |
| 20020129565 | Silberman et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
| 20070017163 | Silberman et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 2-217539 | Aug 1990 | JP |
| 2-269237 | Nov 1990 | JP |
| 3-115632 | May 1991 | JP |
| 4-323446 | Nov 1992 | JP |
| 8006712 | Jul 1982 | NL |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20070017163 A1 | Jan 2007 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 60659792 | Mar 2005 | US |