The present invention relates to a separator filler or spline. More particularly the present invention relates to the separator filler or spline having four pockets with each pocket having a cross-sectional area that is less than the envelope area of a pair of cables adapted to be placed in each pocket.
The most popular separator fillers or splines are generally based on a circular cross-section wherein each pocket generally has a cross-sectional area that is greater than the cross-sectional envelope area of the twisted pair cable that is to be placed in the pocket. This type of spline generally has less flexibility and undesirable to skew degradation.
The oval envelope provided by my spline has an acceptable NEXT performance and good flexibility. Therefore, it is an object of the present invention to provide a cable separator filler or spline having a plurality and preferably four opened pockets for separating a plurality of cable pairs, preferably one cable pair for each pocket. Preferably when there are an even number of pockets, the pockets are diametrically opposite each other. When there are four pockets, the first and second pockets are diametrically opposite each other and third and fourth pockets are diametrically opposite each other. In a cross-sectional plane of the spline the diametric distance between the ends of the first and second pockets is greater than the diametric distance of the ends of the group of the third and fourth pockets to provide an oval envelope for the spline. All of the pockets have a cross-sectional area that is less than the envelope cross-sectional area of the cable pair that is to be placed in the respective pockets. The longitudinal axis of each of the pockets are all substantially parallel to each other.
A cable manufactured using the spline of my invention generally uses an oval envelope spline having four pockets and has a twisted pair cable in each pocket. The long lay twisted pair cables are both preferably in the pockets on the major axis of the oval envelope. The short lay twisted pair cables are both in the pockets on the minor axis of the oval envelope. In this embodiment the core components are comprised of the elongated separator spline and the four twisted pair cables. The core can of course be shielded and jacketed, just jacketed or any other desired cable construction that would benefit from the use of my elongated separator spline.
With my elongated separator spline long and short lay twisted pairs can be ideally placed for maximum electrical advantages. Short lay pairs, which have the best flexibility can be placed across the minor axis of the separator spline. Short lays typically have improved NEXT and the close proximity to one another does little to worsen NEXT. The long lay pairs can be placed across the major axis where bending strain is minimized. This overall cable design will bend across the minor axis based on the fact that the “column” will collapse across its minimum integral bending moment axis. The use of my elongated separator spline also improves skew over a similar round design because two unique cabling lay factors are in practice when the twisted pairs are cabled (minor and major axis). This helps compensate for the pair lengths between the long and short lay pairs equalizing the final conductor lengths which also tends to improve attenuation delta from the minimum lay pair to the maximum lay pair. My spline may be “metalized”, or coated with any form of metallic material that will preserve its exterior shape, and substantially improve NEXT while still enhancing the attenuation delta and skew of pairs.
Generally alien NEXT is minimized since the cables “oval” will provide air spacing between parallel cables of any other type. Also there are economies in my spline over the generally used cylindrical splines in that less filler material generally is used in my elongated separator spline than in a round design for equal performance.
The present invention and the advantages thereof will become more apparent upon consideration of the following detailed description when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings
The following description taken in conjunction with the drawings will further explain the inventive features of my elongated separator spline and cables utilizing my elongated separator spline.
Referring to
Each of the pockets 23 and 24 have a depth 32 and each of the pockets 26 and 27 have a depth 33. The depths 32 and 33 of the pockets is less than the diameter 34 of the twisted pair envelope 31. The cross-sectional depth 32 of the pockets 23 and 24 is less than the cross-sectional depth 33 of the pockets 26 and 27. In a preferred embodiment, each of the cross-sectional areas 28 and 29 is 25% to 75% of the cross-sectional area of the envelope 31. The preferred elongated separator spline 20 has four longitudinally extending pockets 23, 24, 26 and 27 of two different sizes. However, if it is desired, the sizes of the pocket can all be different depending upon the size of the cables that are to be placed in the pockets. The size of the pockets will scale up or down based on the size of the cable, i.e., 30 (
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
Referring to
The drain wires 61 and 71 are generally made with tinned copper, tinned aluminum, etc.
The size of the twisted pair cables 41 and 42 are generally about 24 AWG. to about 22 AWG.
The conductors 35 for the twisted pair cables are generally copper, tinned copper, or an appropriate bronze and these are generally insulated with a foamed on non-foamed insulation 35(a) of polyethylene, polypropylene, fluorinated ethylene propylene, tetrafluoroethylene, polyvinyl chloride, etc.
Although I have described my elongated spline as having four pockets, the spline may have more or less pockets.
It will, of course, be appreciated that the embodiments which have just been described have been given by way of illustration, and the invention is not limited to the precise embodiments described herein. Various changes and modifications may be effected by one skilled in the art at without departing from the scope or spirit of the invention as defined in the appended claims.
The present application is a continuation of application Ser. No. 09/452,702 filed Dec. 2, 1999, now U.S. Pat. No. 6,297,454 B1.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
483285 | Guilleaume | Sep 1892 | A |
514925 | Guilleaume | Feb 1894 | A |
1977209 | Sargent | Oct 1934 | A |
2204737 | Swallow et al. | Jun 1940 | A |
2538019 | Lee | Jan 1951 | A |
3588313 | Delves-Broughton | Jun 1971 | A |
3603715 | Vinnhorst et al. | Sep 1971 | A |
3621118 | Bunish et al. | Nov 1971 | A |
3819443 | Simons et al. | Jun 1974 | A |
3911200 | Simons et al. | Oct 1975 | A |
3927247 | Timmons | Dec 1975 | A |
4038489 | Stenson et al. | Jul 1977 | A |
4374881 | Hamilton | Feb 1983 | A |
4474426 | Yataki | Oct 1984 | A |
4683349 | Takebe | Jul 1987 | A |
4719319 | Tighe, Jr. | Jan 1988 | A |
4729409 | Paul | Mar 1988 | A |
4778246 | Carroll | Oct 1988 | A |
4807962 | Arroyo et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
5132488 | Tessier et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5177809 | Zeidler | Jan 1993 | A |
5289556 | Rawlyk et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5305797 | Roy, Sr. | Apr 1994 | A |
5444184 | Hassel | Aug 1995 | A |
5574250 | Hardie et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5789711 | Gareis et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5952615 | Prudhon | Sep 1999 | A |
5969295 | Boucino et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
6150612 | Grandy et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6222130 | Gareis et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6310295 | Despard | Oct 2001 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2459844 | Jul 1976 | DE |
4-332406 | Nov 1992 | JP |
4-332406 | Nov 1992 | JP |
404332406 | Nov 1992 | JP |
5-101711 | Apr 1993 | JP |
1343447 | Oct 1987 | SU |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030132021 A1 | Jul 2003 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09452702 | Dec 1999 | US |
Child | 09929613 | US |