Cable ties are commonly used in wire-management applications (e.g., keeping wires in their proper locations, bundling groups of wires together). Typically, a cable tie can be looped around multiple wires, then tightened to cinch the wires together. The tail of the cable tie is then cut using a cutting tool (e.g., a wire cutter). The cable tie can be tightened or loosened to achieve a tension level that provides appropriate rigidity or flexibility. Whether this is done with the aid of a tool or by hand, maintaining a consistent tension can be very difficult. Tools, for example, can provide inconsistent tensioning of cable ties due to lifetime wear. A more-specialized solution to provide consistent tension to cable ties can enable precise cable tie tensioning for wire-management and other applications.
This document describes a cable tie application tool. In one example, a cable tie application tool includes a housing, a power-delivery system included in the housing, an electro-mechanical tensioning system driven by the power-delivery system, a sensing system configured to sense a particular amount of force with which a cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system, and a cut-off system configured to cut the cable tie after the cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system.
In another example, a method includes driving, with a power-delivery system included in a housing of a cable tie application tool, an electro-mechanical tensioning system of the cable tie application tool to grab and tighten a cable tie. The method further includes sensing a particular amount of force with which the cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system, then activating a cut-off system of the cable tie application tool to cut the cable tie when the particular amount of force satisfies a predetermined setting.
This document also describes means for performing the above-summarized method and other methods set forth herein, in addition to describing methods performed by the above-summarized systems and methods performed by other systems set forth herein.
This summary introduces simplified concepts of a cable tie application tool, which are further described below in the Detailed Description and Drawings. This summary is not intended to identify essential features of the claimed subject matter, nor is it intended for use in determining the scope of the claimed subject matter.
The details of one or more aspects of a cable tie application tool are described in this document with reference to the following drawings. The same numbers are used throughout multiple drawings to reference like features and components:
Cable ties are commonly used in wire-management applications (e.g., keeping wires in their proper locations, bundling groups of wires together). Typically, a cable tie can be looped around multiple wires, then tightened to cinch the wires together. The cable tie can be tightened or loosened to achieve a tension level that provides appropriate rigidity or flexibility.
Cable ties are currently applied using various methods. When done by hand, obtaining a consistent tension is very difficult, and the tail of the cable tie is then cut using another tool (e.g., a wire cutter). Certain tools are available that provide some degree of tensioning consistency and will typically cut the cable tie tail flush to the head. These tools are currently available and utilize various power-provision schemes that are hand-operated, pneumatic-controlled, electric-powered, and battery-powered. The tensioning control of these tools can depend on the type of power that is used and the product manufacturer, though most use a mechanical means for this function.
Mechanical tension-control systems, however, are inherently inconsistent over the life of the tool due to the natural wear of various components. Consequently, the tension supplied from a new tool will be different than that of a used tool. In addition, hand-operated versions will be inherently less ergonomic than powered systems due to the need to manually supply the force to tension and cut the cable ties.
Feedback systems (e.g., current feedback) of electric-powered tools have attempted to mitigate the tension-variation problems discussed above. However, wear will also affect the current in electric-powered tools, making them less consistent over time. Therefore, electric-powered tools do not satisfactorily address the above-mentioned issues.
A cable tie application tool is described that includes an electro-mechanical tensioning system. When the electro-mechanical tensioning system is controlled by a processor to tighten a cable, a reactionary force through a drive nut that is pivotally mounted to a tension bar can be monitored and measured by a strain gauge, a load cell, or another sensing system. This reactionary force is an indication of tension on the cable tie and is monitored by the processor until the tension reaches a predetermined threshold, at which point the processor causes a motor in the tensioning system to stop increasing the tension on the cable tie. The processor then activates a cut-off system to cut the cable tie that has been tightened to the predetermined tension.
There are two primary differences between prior tools and the example cable tie application tool presented herein. The first is the method of detecting tension. Prior cable tie application tools primarily utilize mechanical, spring-balance systems, which are connected to the member that is pulling on or tightening the cable tie, typically called a “pawl link” or a “pawl.” If a spring balance is used, it is connected between this pawl and the primary loading system, which is a finger or hand trigger in manual tools. As the trigger is pulled, the force generated is transmitted through the spring-balance system and into the pawl. As the tension in the cable tie builds, resistance to additional movement is generated, which affects the spring balance. Once a desired tension is achieved, the spring balance will decouple from the trigger, thereby activating a cut-off mechanism. A problem with this style of system is that wear to the components can occur, causing fatigue in the springs. The combination of these issues causes the tension trip-point to vary over the life of the product. As mentioned in the description above, the cable tie application tool presented herein eliminates these wear and fatigue issues and therefore delivers consistent tensioning to a cable tie over the life of the cable tie application tool.
The power-delivery system, including the electric motor 2, is integrated into the cable tie application tool and connected to a battery or an external power source. The electric motor 2 can be a brushless motor. In the illustrated example, electrical power is supplied via a battery contained within the cable tie application tool and connected to the electric motor 2. In other examples, the cable tie application tool is powered by an external electrical power source.
The electric motor 2 is directly connected to the drive tube 5. Therefore, when the electric motor 2 is activated, it will cause the drive tube 5 to rotate. The drive tube 5, being directly connected to the electrical motor 2, allows this rotation to occur in either direction, clockwise or counterclockwise. The electric motor 2 may be configured to rotate the drive tube when activated. Once activated, the electric motor 2 is configured to rotate the drive tube 5 in either a clockwise direction or a counterclockwise direction.
The electro-mechanical tensioning system further includes a drive nut 17 located at a forward end of the drive tube 5 and configured to rotate with the drive tube 5. With the drive nut 17 located at the forward end of the drive tube 5, the drive nut 17 is secured within the drive tube 5 by an alignment pin 18; the alignment pin 18 is configured to secure the drive nut 17 to the forward end of the drive tube 5, and therefore the rotation of the drive tube 5 will result in rotation of the drive nut 17.
The pawl assembly of the electro-mechanical tensioning system is connected to a reciprocating screw 16, including threads configured to engage with threads of the drive nut 17 to prevent rotation of the pawl assembly. The drive nut 17 engages the reciprocating screw 16, which is threaded through the drive nut 17. The reciprocating screw 16 is connected to the pawl assembly so as to prevent rotation of these components. The reciprocating screw 16 is configured to generate a reactionary force upon the drive nut 17 due to increases in the particular amount of force.
As the drive nut 17 rotates, an axial movement of the reciprocating screw 16 results from this arrangement. The reciprocating screw 16 is configured to generate an axial movement of the pawl assembly based on the rotation of the drive nut 17. The axial movement includes a forward motion of the pawl assembly based on a forward rotation of the drive nut 17. The axial movement includes a rearward motion of the pawl assembly based on a reverse rotation of the drive nut 17, where the reverse rotation is in an opposite direction as the forward rotation of the drive nut 17. That is, rotation in one direction will result in the forward motion of the pawl assembly, and reverse rotation will result in the rearward motion of this assembly.
The pawl assembly includes the pawl 6, a gripper 23 attached to the pawl 6, a torsional spring, and a gripper shaft configured to rotate around the torsional spring to cause the gripper 23 to rotate into engagement with a cable tie. The gripper 23 may be rotatably attached to the pawl 6.
The pawl assembly further includes a compression spring 22 configured to bias (e.g., forward-bias, reverse-bias) the pawl assembly from the reciprocating screw. As the pawl assembly moves rearward from its starting position, the gripper 23 is free to rotate towards the cable tie to engage and begin pulling or tightening the cable tie in this direction. The gripper 23 is configured to rotate to engage with the cable tie and pull the cable tie towards the pawl assembly or tighten with a particular amount of force.
For example, as the cable tie tightens around a wire bundle, the force applied to tighten or pull the cable tie increases. This force generates a reactionary force between the reciprocating screw 16 and the drive nut 17. The reciprocating screw 16 is configured to generate a reactionary force upon the drive nut 17 as the particular amount of force increases.
The reciprocating screw 16 may be further configured to move in a rearward direction to generate the reactionary force upon the drive nut 17. That is, during the tightening process, the reciprocating screw 16 is moving in the rearward direction, and the reactionary force generated from the screw 16 against the drive nut 17 will, therefore, be directed in the forward direction.
Although not shown, the cable tie application tool includes a processor, a controller, or other logic that activates the cut-off system, which by returning to
The cut-off system of the cable tie application tool can include a solenoid 13. The solenoid 13 is configured to energize when the cut-off system is activated by the processor. The solenoid 13 is configured to free the actuator 8 to move rearward to the cut-off spring 3 and into the loaded condition. When the cut-off system is activated, the solenoid 13 energizes, pulling a solenoid shaft 14 into the solenoid 13. The solenoid shaft 14 may be anchored by an anchor pin 15 to the cut-off camshaft 12. The solenoid shaft 14 pulls the cut-off camshaft 12 downwards, freeing the actuator 8 to move rearward based on pressure from the cut-off spring 3.
The cut-off system further includes a blade 20 connected to the actuator 8 and configured to cut a cable tie when the actuator 8 moves rearward into the loaded condition. In some examples, the cut-off system further includes a roller 9 configured to traverse down an actuator ramp 8A when the actuator 8 moves rearward into the loaded condition. This has the effect of rotating a link 7 between the actuator 8 and the blade 20, thereby cutting the cable tie. The rearward movement of the actuator 8 may cause the roller 9 to roll down the actuator ramp 8A, resulting in a rotation of the link 7. This rotation results in the upward movement of the blade 20, thereby cutting the cable tie.
In some examples, the cut-off system includes a motor and a camshaft that replace the solenoid 13 and the actuator 8. A second electric motor is configured to free the actuator 8 to move rearward to the cut-off spring 3 and into the loaded condition. Once the particular tension on a cable tie is achieved, the motor in the electro-mechanical tensioning system is stopped, and the motor in the cut-off system is activated. This second motor drives the link 7, causing the blade 20 to cut the cable tie.
At 702, a cable tie application tool drives an electro-mechanical tensioning system with a power-delivery system to grab and tighten a cable tie. For example, the processor of the cable tie application tool may be configured to activate the electric motor 2 of the power-delivery system when the particular amount of force does not satisfy a preselected tension setting.
At 704, the cable tie application tool senses a particular amount of force with which the cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system. The cable tie application tool precisely controls the electro-mechanical tensioning system. To do so, the electro-mechanical tensioning system can utilize a “homing” proximity sensor while also monitoring pulses supplied to and from the electric motor 2. For example, the power delivery system may include a proximity sensor configured to monitor a relative movement of a component of the cable tie application tool to determine the reactionary force. The proximity sensor may monitor the relative movement by measuring a level of rotation of an armature of the electric motor 2, for example, by counting pulses to and from the electric motor 2. That is, the pulse sent to and from the electric motor 2 indicates a level of rotation of an armature of the electric motor 2 and can be directly related to the distance traveled by the electro-mechanical tensioning system.
Additional proximity sensors may be used to monitor positions of various other components within the assembly. The relative movement can be for any component where its distance-traveled during activation of the electro-mechanical tensioning system is proportional to an amount of tension on a cable tie being tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system. While this is a viable option, proximity sensors are typically less accurate than the pulse counting.
At 706, the cable tie application tool activates a cut-off system to cut the cable tie when the particular amount of force satisfies a predetermined setting. For example, the processor of the cable tie application tool may be configured to deactivate the electric motor 2 of the power delivery system when the particular amount of force satisfies the preselected tension setting. The processor may be further configured to activate the cut-off system when the particular amount of force satisfies the preselected tension setting.
The processor 814 is configured to determine, based on a reactionary force measured at the central portion 11A of the tension rod 11, the particular amount of force with which the electro-mechanical tension assembly pulls or tightens the cable tie. For example, the sensing system 810 can include strain gauges placed in the central portion 11A of the tension rod 11 to measure the reaction force and, therefore, the amount of tension that is tightening or pulling a cable tie tight during the operation of the cable tie application tool 800. If string gauges are used, the drive nut 17 is pivotally mounted to the tension rod 11. The processor 814, therefore, may be configured to determine the reactionary force using the one or more strain gauges. The sensing system 810 may include one or more load cells that are configured to measure the reactionary force, and the processor 814 may be configured to determine the reactionary force using the one or more load cells. In such a configuration, the reaction force is directed to the load cells rather than the tension rod 11 (which, in the case of load cells, can be omitted from the cable tie application tool entirely), and the signal from the load cell is sent to the processor 814.
The processor 814 can receive information from the gauges and compare the information to a predetermined tension setting that was preprogrammed into the processor 814 or stored in an internal memory or other non-tangible computer-readable storage medium operationally coupled to the processor 814 and inside the housing of the cable tie application tool 800. To avoid having to calibrate the cable tie application tool 800 during manufacturing or after prolonged use, a difference logic may be used to determine whether a cable tie is tightened to a predetermined tension. The processor 814 is configured to determine the reactionary force as a difference in pressure from when the actuator 8 is in an unloaded condition to when the actuator 8 moves into the loaded condition. The processor 814 can monitor an unloaded measurement taken by the sensing system 810 and then compare the unloaded measurement against the reactionary force and tension placed on the cable tie. A difference between the two values provides an indication of a true amount of tension applied to the cable tie. An advantage in utilizing the difference is calibration can be eliminated.
Once the electro-mechanical tensioning system 808 achieves the predetermined tension setting or another threshold, the processor 814 deactivates the electro-mechanical tensioning system 808 by shutting down the electric motor 2. Afterward, the processor activates the cut-off system 812.
In this way, the cable tie application tool 800 does not suffer similar drawbacks that other cable tie application tools have over the life of the tool. Specifically, the problem of tension variation over the life of the tool is solved by the cable tie application tool 800 measuring the reaction force created from tightening the cable tie and utilizing the measurement of this force to activate the cut-off system 812. This is a more direct measure of the tension on the cable tie, which will not vary, even if components of the cable tie application tool 800 wear from prolonged use.
In the following section, additional examples are provided.
Example 1. A cable tie application tool comprising: a housing; a power delivery system included in the housing; an electro-mechanical tensioning system driven by the power delivery system; a sensing system configured to sense a particular amount of force with which a cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system; and a cut-off system configured to cut the cable tie after the cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system.
Example 2. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the power delivery system includes an electric motor connected to a battery of the cable tie application tool or an external power source.
Example 3. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electric motor comprises a brushless motor.
Example 4. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electro-mechanical tensioning system includes a drive tube directly connected to the electrical motor.
Example 5. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electric motor is configured to rotate the drive tube when activated.
Example 6. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electric motor is configured to rotate the drive tube in either a clockwise direction or a counterclockwise direction when activated.
Example 7. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electro-mechanical tensioning system further includes a drive nut located at a forward end of the drive tube and configured to rotate with the drive tube.
Example 8. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electro-mechanical system further includes an alignment pin configured to secure the drive nut to the forward end of the drive tube.
Example 9. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the electro-mechanical tensioning system further includes: a pawl assembly; and connected to the pawl assembly, a reciprocating screw including threads configured to engage with threads of the drive nut to prevent rotation of the pawl assembly.
Example 10. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the reciprocating screw is configured to generate an axial movement of the pawl assembly based on rotation of the drive nut.
Example 11. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the axial movement comprises forward motion of the pawl assembly based on a forward rotation of the drive nut, and the axial movement comprises rearward motion of the pawl assembly based on a reverse rotation of the drive nut.
Example 12. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the pawl assembly comprises: a pawl; a gripper attached to the pawl; a torsional spring; and a gripper shaft configured to rotate around the torsional spring to cause the gripper to rotate into engagement with a cable tie.
Example 13. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the pawl assembly further comprises: a compression spring configured to forward-bias the pawl assembly from the reciprocating screw.
Example 14. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the gripper is configured to rotate to engage with the cable tie and tighten the cable tie towards the pawl assembly with the particular amount of force.
Example 15. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the reciprocating screw is configured to generate a reactionary force upon the drive nut as the particular amount of force increases.
Example 16. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the reciprocating screw is further configured to move in a rearward direction to generate the reactionary force upon the drive nut.
Example 17. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the drive tube is further configured to create a moment upon a lever by translating the reactionary force through a thrust-washer assembly of the cable tie application tool and into the lever.
Example 18. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein one end of the lever is pivotally attached to the housing, and another end of the lever is connected to a tension rod of the cable tie application tool.
Example 19. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the drive tube is further configured to create the moment upon the lever by translating the reactionary force through the tension rod in a forward direction opposite the rearward direction.
Example 20. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the tension rod is configured to distribute the reactionary force throughout a central portion of the tension rod.
Example 21. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, further comprising: a processor configured to determine, based on a reactionary force measured at a central portion of a tension rod of the cable tie application tool, the particular amount of force with which the electro-mechanical tension assembly tightens the cable tie.
Example 22. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the sensing system comprises one or more load cells that are configured to measure the reactionary force and the processor is further configured to determine the reactionary force using the one or more load cells.
Example 23. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the sensing system comprises one or more strain gauges that are configured to measure the reactionary force, and the processor is further configured to determine the reactionary force using the one or more strain gauges.
Example 24. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the sensing system further includes a tension bar attached to the one or more strain gauges, wherein the drive nut is pivotally mounted within the tension bar.
Example 25. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the processor is further configured to activate an electric motor of the power delivery system when the particular amount of force does not satisfy a preselected tension setting.
Example 26. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the processor is further configured to deactivate the electric motor when the particular amount of force satisfies the preselected tension setting.
Example 27. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the processor is further configured to activate the cut-off system when the particular amount of force satisfies the preselected tension setting.
Example 28. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the cut-off system includes: a cut-off spring; and an actuator configured to be in a loaded condition before the processor activates the cut-off system, the actuator configured to compress the cut-off spring when the actuator is in the loaded condition by applying a rearward pressure.
Example 29. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the cut-off system further includes a solenoid configured to energize when the cut-off system is activated, the solenoid configured to free the actuator to move rearward to the cut-off spring and into the loaded condition.
Example 30. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the cut-off system further includes a blade connected to the actuator and configured to cut the cable tie when the actuator moves rearward into the loaded condition.
Example 31. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the cut-off system further includes a roller configured to traverse down an actuator ramp when the actuator moves rearward into the loaded condition to rotate a link between the actuator and the blade and cut the cable tie.
Example 32. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the processor is further configured to determine the reactionary force as a difference in pressure from when the actuator is in an unloaded condition to when the actuator moves into the loaded condition.
Example 33. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the cut-off system includes an electric motor configured to free the actuator to move rearward to the cut-off spring and into the loaded condition.
Example 34. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the power delivery system further includes a proximity sensor configured to monitor a relative movement of a component of the cable tie application tool to determine the reactionary force.
Example 35. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the power delivery system further includes a proximity sensor configured to monitor the relative movement by measuring a level of rotation of an armature of the electric motor.
Example 36. The cable tie application tool of any other example contained herein, wherein the proximity sensor is configured to monitor the relative movement by measuring the level of rotation of the armature of the electric motor by counting pulses to and from the electric motor.
Example 37. A method comprising: driving, with a power delivery system included in a housing of a cable tie application tool, an electro-mechanical tensioning system of the cable tie application tool to grab and tighten a cable tie; sensing a particular amount of force with which the cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system; and activating a cut-off system of the cable tie application tool to cut the cable tie when the particular amount of force satisfies a predetermined setting.
Example 38. A system comprising: means for driving an electro-mechanical tensioning system of a cable tie application tool to grab and tighten a cable tie; means for sensing a particular amount of force with which the cable tie is tightened by the electro-mechanical tensioning system; and means for activating a cut-off system of the cable tie application tool to cut the cable tie when the particular amount of force satisfies a predetermined setting.
While various embodiments of the disclosure are described in the foregoing description and shown in the drawings, it is to be understood that this disclosure is not limited thereto, but may be variously embodied to practice within the scope of the following claims. From the foregoing description, it will be apparent that various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure as defined by the following claims.
The use of “or” and grammatically related terms indicates non-exclusive alternatives without limitation, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. As used herein, a phrase referring to “at least one of” a list of items refers to any combination of those items, including single members. As an example, “at least one of: a, b, or c” is intended to cover a, b, c, a-b, a-c, b-c, and a-b-c, as well as, any combination with multiples of the same element (e.g., a-a, a-a-a, a-a-b, a-a-c, a-b-b, a-c-c, b-b, b-b-b, b-b-c, c-c, and c-c-c or any other ordering of a, b, and c).
This application is a continuation of and claims priority to U.S. patent application Ser. No. 17/009,628, filed on Sep. 1, 2020, which in turn claims the benefit of U.S. Patent Application Ser. No. 62/906,293, filed on Sep. 26, 2019, the disclosures of which are hereby incorporated by reference in their entireties.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3865156 | Moody | Feb 1975 | A |
4371010 | Hidassy | Feb 1983 | A |
4495972 | Walker | Jan 1985 | A |
4534817 | O'Sullivan | Aug 1985 | A |
4790225 | Moody et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4793385 | Dyer et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
D306390 | Dyer | Mar 1990 | S |
4997011 | Dyer et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5205328 | Johnson | Apr 1993 | A |
5287802 | Pearson | Feb 1994 | A |
5492156 | Dyer et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5595220 | Leban et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5769133 | Dyer et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5809873 | Chak et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5909751 | Teagno | Jun 1999 | A |
5915425 | Nilsson | Jun 1999 | A |
5921290 | Dyer et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
D430781 | Hillegonds | Sep 2000 | S |
6206053 | Hillegonds | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6302157 | Deschenes et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6354336 | Eban | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6401766 | Ishikawa | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6497258 | Flannery et al. | Dec 2002 | B1 |
D473773 | Hillegonds et al. | Apr 2003 | S |
6543341 | Lopez | Apr 2003 | B2 |
D491430 | Magno et al. | Jun 2004 | S |
6751828 | Matschiner et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6840289 | Hillegonds | Jan 2005 | B2 |
D510244 | Magno et al. | Oct 2005 | S |
7124787 | Lueschen | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7165379 | Lai | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7210506 | Magno | May 2007 | B2 |
7216679 | Magno et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
D543811 | Lueschen | Jun 2007 | S |
7231944 | Magno et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
D547626 | Lueschen et al. | Jul 2007 | S |
7299830 | Levin et al. | Nov 2007 | B2 |
7591451 | Dyer et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
8240343 | Dyer et al. | Aug 2012 | B2 |
D692738 | Dyer | Nov 2013 | S |
8955556 | Myers et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
8960241 | Dyer | Feb 2015 | B2 |
D732361 | Dyer | Jun 2015 | S |
D755029 | Myers et al. | May 2016 | S |
D758155 | Kruzel | Jun 2016 | S |
9394067 | Dyer | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9394068 | Dyer | Jul 2016 | B2 |
9481102 | Hojnacki et al. | Nov 2016 | B1 |
9550590 | Dyer | Jan 2017 | B2 |
9694924 | Myers et al. | Jul 2017 | B2 |
D818787 | Kitago | May 2018 | S |
D856101 | Kitago | Aug 2019 | S |
D878177 | Kitago | Mar 2020 | S |
D885861 | Ni | Jun 2020 | S |
11008123 | Kitago | May 2021 | B2 |
11008124 | Kitago | May 2021 | B2 |
11027902 | Geiger et al. | Jun 2021 | B2 |
11511894 | Hempe et al. | Nov 2022 | B2 |
20020093211 | Filipiak et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020108664 | Kurmis | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108666 | Kurmis | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108667 | Thieme | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020108668 | Thieme | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020129866 | Czebatul et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20030136278 | Miyazaki et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20040079436 | Hillegonds | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040244606 | Haberstroh et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20040244866 | Ishikawa et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050178460 | Magno | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178461 | Magno et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060011254 | Yokochi et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060037661 | Lueschen | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20070157555 | Tanner | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070199610 | Itagaki | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20080035232 | Levin et al. | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20090121069 | Dyer et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20130167698 | Dyer | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130167969 | Myers et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130167970 | Dyer | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20150053300 | Myers et al. | Feb 2015 | A1 |
20150151862 | Kitago | Jun 2015 | A1 |
20150239588 | Kitago | Aug 2015 | A1 |
20160016682 | Boss et al. | Jan 2016 | A1 |
20160046398 | Neeser et al. | Feb 2016 | A1 |
20160075456 | Nomura et al. | Mar 2016 | A1 |
20160167813 | Myers | Jun 2016 | A1 |
20160230907 | Kitago | Aug 2016 | A1 |
20160280405 | Thieme et al. | Sep 2016 | A1 |
20170057674 | Myers | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170174374 | Figiel et al. | Jun 2017 | A1 |
20170334587 | McFall et al. | Nov 2017 | A1 |
20190106231 | Schwinn et al. | Apr 2019 | A1 |
20190127095 | Kitago | May 2019 | A1 |
20190144149 | Dohrmann et al. | May 2019 | A1 |
20190210749 | Kitago | Jul 2019 | A1 |
20210094713 | Hempe et al. | Apr 2021 | A1 |
20230128208 | Dyer | Apr 2023 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1100054 | Mar 1995 | CN |
1572657 | Feb 2005 | CN |
1660675 | Aug 2005 | CN |
101486385 | Jul 2009 | CN |
101585419 | Nov 2009 | CN |
101983159 | Mar 2011 | CN |
102859821 | Jan 2013 | CN |
202670128 | Jan 2013 | CN |
104870315 | Aug 2015 | CN |
206579887 | Oct 2017 | CN |
108791998 | Nov 2018 | CN |
69728071 | Feb 2005 | DE |
102014103334 | Sep 2015 | DE |
0722885 | Jul 1996 | EP |
0839717 | May 1998 | EP |
1564146 | Aug 2005 | EP |
3068693 | Jan 2019 | EP |
3466819 | Nov 2020 | EP |
3483075 | Dec 2020 | EP |
H09240617 | Sep 1997 | JP |
2000103407 | Apr 2000 | JP |
102267779 | Jun 2021 | KR |
9815458 | Apr 1998 | WO |
2009152707 | Dec 2009 | WO |
2015067444 | May 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202011032227.6, dated Nov. 3, 2022, 7 pages. |
“Autotool 2000 CPK Operating Instructions”, HellermanTyton, 106-29006, Apr. 2, 2015, 29 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 18192166.9, dated Jan. 15, 2019, 5 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20198300.4, dated May 20, 2021, 11 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/120,926, dated Feb. 17, 2022, 13 pages. |
“Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/120,926, dated Nov. 15, 2021, 18 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201811344796.7, dated Jan. 26, 2021, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201811167015.1, dated Apr. 24, 2020, 18 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201811167015.1, dated Jun. 2, 2021, 7 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202011032227.6, dated Jun. 7, 2022, 55 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202011032227.6, dated Jun. 7, 2022, 58 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201811344796.7, dated Jun. 28, 2020, 17 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 201811167015.1, dated Dec. 11, 2020, 14 pages. |
“Foreign Office Action”, CN Application No. 202011032227.6, dated Dec. 16, 2021, 23 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,628, dated Mar. 11, 2022, 23 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/120,926, dated May 27, 2020, 13 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/163,677, dated Jun. 1, 2020, 14 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/163,677, filed Jun. 10, 2022, 15 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,628, filed Nov. 29, 2021, 20 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/163,677, filed Dec. 7, 2021, 19 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 17/009,628, dated Jul. 29, 2022, 8 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 16/163,677, dated Aug. 25, 2022, 11 pages. |
“Partial European Search Report”, EP Application No. 20198300.4, dated Feb. 18, 2021, 12 pages. |
“Today's Mechanisms Mini Test”, 4CR—Technological Studies—Retrieved at: gwcts3.blogspot.com/2011/09/todays-mechanisms-mini-test.html—on Nov. 19, 2021, Sep. 16, 2011, 3 pages. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 7 Series & 7i Series Nosepiece, 1/Pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-70011/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 7 Series & 7i Series Nosepiece, 1mm tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-70131/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 7 Series & 7i Series Nosepiece, 2mm tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-70132/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 7 Series & 7i Series Nosepiece, 3mm tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-70133/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 9 and EVO 9i 2mm Nosepiece, Extended Tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-80064/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 9 and EVO 9i 3mm Nosepiece, Extended Tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-80065/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 9 and EVO 9i 4mm Nosepiece, Extended Tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-80066/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 9 and EVO 9i 5mm Nosepiece, Extended Tail, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-80067/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Hellermantyton, “EVO 9 Nosepiece Flush Cut, Replacement Part, 1/pkg”, Retrieved at: https://www.hellermanntyton.us/products/110-80018/—on Mar. 30, 2022, 1 page. |
Pishehvari, et al., “Ego-pose estimation via Radar and Openstreetmap-based Scan matching”, May 2018, 8 pages. |
“Extended European Search Report”, EP Application No. 22184450.9, dated Apr. 20, 2023, 8 pages. |
“Non-Final Office Action”, U.S. Appl. No. 29/812,879, dated May 8, 2023, 5 pages. |
“Notice of Allowance”, U.S. Appl. No. 29/812,879, dated Aug. 17, 2023, 6 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20230060775 A1 | Mar 2023 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62906293 | Sep 2019 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 17009628 | Sep 2020 | US |
Child | 18049821 | US |