1. Field of Invention
The present invention relates generally to an advanced neck design for cable ties.
2. Description of Related Art
Cable ties have traditionally been formed by an integral molding of a cable tie head and a cable strap. Most of these cable ties involve a design in which the elongated strap extends straight outward from the cable tie head. An example of such a conventional cable tie design is U.S. Pat. No. 3,949,449 to Caveney et al., which is represented in
As shown, this conventional cable tie 100 includes an elongated strap 110 extending from an integrally molded cable tie head 120. A neck area 130 is formed at the interface between strap 110 and head 120. Cable tie head 120 includes a strap accepting channel 140 that receives strap 110 and a locking device 150. In use, cable tie 100 can be wrapped around objects such as a bundle of cables 160 and locked in place as known in the art.
With such a conventional design, there is often little or no bending at the neck area 130. Rather, bending incrementally occurs throughout the length of strap 110 as apparent from
There also is known a bent neck type of cable tie, such as the one shown in
The design shown in
Furthermore, for either design there is a sharp step (change in cross-section) from the transition of neck section 130 to cable tie head 120, there is a distinct potential for stress risers. As the neck section bends considerably in either direction, such stress risers can lead to part failures, particularly when brittle materials are used for the part.
It is an object of the invention to provide a cable tie with an improved neck design. The neck design allows improved flexibility and bending at the neck without reducing loop strength from that attained in the strap section. Moreover, the neck design maintains a generous edge radius that prevents cable insulation damage and allows use of a simpler mold design.
Applicants have found that the lie of a strap in a bent neck type cable tie can be improved by maximizing the radius of the neck at the bend and by improving the neck's flexibility. The strap thickness, parting line angle, and strap body edge radii limit the size of the radii that can transition from cable tie head to neck.
The general equation for the moment of inertia for a simple rectangular cross-section cable tie is I=(B×T3)/12 where B is the width of the strap and T is the thickness of the strap. The flexibility of the neck can be improved by: 1) making the strap narrower; or 2) making the strap thinner. Reducing either variable and holding the other constant would reduce the moment of inertia and thereby decrease the force to bend the part in that region. However, doing so will also decrease the area through the section (A≈B×T), which has the adverse effect of decreasing tensile strength through the section. As such, attempts to increase bending flexibility using these methods would result in reduced tensile strength, which is undesirable.
Applicants have noted that by increasing the width of the strap while decreasing the thickness, one can achieve a desired lower moment of inertia while maintaining or increasing the tensile strength (area) of the section. The magnitude of the moment of inertia can be decreased as the strap width increases by reducing the overall thickness of the part, or by creating a channel on either or both sides of the part. The channel-shaped geometry has the added advantage that a larger thickness flow path is maintained for the purpose of more easily filling out a molded part.
Applicants have also found manufacturing and use advantages to increasing of the width of the strap to match the width of the cable tie head. This provides the most desirable tooling configuration for a stepped parting line part, which may be used to create bent neck type cable ties such as those of the claimed invention. That is, a neck width that matches the head width eliminates the need for weak or complicated mold components to eliminate sharp edges or mismatches on the part. Such a design in which a neck width matches the head width also eliminates a traditional stress concentration where there is an abrupt change in cross-section.
The above and other objects are achieved by a cable tie that includes an integral cable tie head and strap. The strap includes a first end forming a neck section, a free end opposite the first end, and an intermediate section between the first end and the free end, the intermediate section having a predetermined width B and thickness T1 defining a predetermined cross-sectional area. The cable tie head is secured to the neck area of the strap at the first end of the strap, the cable tie head having a width E that is wider than strap width B and including a strap accepting channel containing a locking device. The strap accepting channel is sized to receive the free end of the strap. The neck section has a width that transitions from a width of B to a width E′ that is substantially the same as width E and a thickness T2 that is thinner than T1, the neck section having a cross-sectional area that is at least substantially equal to the cross-sectional area of the intermediate section of the strap so as to have a tensile strength at least equal to a tensile strength of the intermediate section of the strap. The cable tie may be a bent neck type cable tie. Preferably, the neck section has at least one recessed channel defining the reduced thickness T2 and thickened side portions.
The foregoing and further objects, features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following description of preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings, wherein:
The invention relates to a cable tie having improved flexibility at a neck section of the cable tie, which is particularly important in a bent neck type cable tie. Conventional cable ties primarily use neck cross-sections that substantially correspond to the cross-section of the strap (see
The strap thickness, parting line angle, and strap body edge radii limit the size of the radii that can transition from cable tie head to neck in a bent neck type cable tie. The general equation for the moment of inertia for a simple rectangular cross-section cable tie is I=(B×T3)/12 where B is the width of the strap and T is the thickness of the strap. The design of
However, by maximizing the radius of the neck at the bend in a bent neck type cable tie and by improving the neck's flexibility, the lie of the strap can be improved. Applicants have found that by increasing the width of the strap while decreasing the thickness, one can achieve a desired lower moment of inertia (I=B×T3) while maintaining or increasing the tensile strength (area) of the section. The magnitude of the moment of inertia can be decreased as the strap width increases by reducing the overall thickness of the part, or by creating a reduced thickness channel on either or both sides of the part. The channel-shaped geometry has the added advantage that a larger thickness flow path (greater cross-sectional area) is maintained for the purpose of more easily filling out a molded part. Exemplary cross-sectional designs that can be used to achieve this result are shown in
In
A first exemplary bent neck type cable tie incorporating these principles is shown in
As best shown in
Applicants have also found manufacturing advantages to increasing the width of the strap at the neck section to match the width of the cable tie head. This provides the most desirable tooling configuration for a stepped parting line part, which can be used to create bent neck type cable ties such as those of the claimed invention. Moreover, by provision of the thickened side portions 136 and 138, a larger flow path is provided between the cable tie head and strap for the purpose and advantage of more readily filling a molded part during molding. This is helpful in assuring adequate material flow during injection molding through the neck section 130, which due to the reduced thickness may otherwise prevent adequate material flow to achieve reliable and consistent molding.
Further, a neck width that matches the head width eliminates the need for weak or complicated mold components that could wear or break to eliminate mismatch and sharp corners on the plastic part. Such a design in which a neck width matches the head width also eliminates a traditional stress concentration where there is an abrupt change in cross-section.
Another exemplary bent neck type cable tie is shown in
As shown in
While the systems of the invention have been described in conjunction with the specific embodiments outlined above, it is evident that many alternatives, modifications and variations will be apparent to those skilled in the art. Accordingly, the exemplary embodiments are intended to be illustrative, not limiting. Various changes may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3186047 | Schwester et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3408699 | Reynolds | Nov 1968 | A |
3457598 | Mariani | Jul 1969 | A |
3486200 | Orenick | Dec 1969 | A |
3488813 | Kohke | Jan 1970 | A |
3490104 | Kabel | Jan 1970 | A |
4001898 | Caveney | Jan 1977 | A |
4640319 | Walker | Feb 1987 | A |
4658478 | Paradis | Apr 1987 | A |
4875647 | Takagi et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
5146654 | Caveney et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5193251 | Fortsch | Mar 1993 | A |
5263231 | Sorensen et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5317787 | Fortsch | Jun 1994 | A |
5517727 | Bernard et al. | May 1996 | A |
5517728 | Woods | May 1996 | A |
D372665 | Kim | Aug 1996 | S |
5630252 | Wells | May 1997 | A |
5669111 | Rohaly | Sep 1997 | A |
5685048 | Benoit | Nov 1997 | A |
5774944 | Choi | Jul 1998 | A |
5776944 | Choi | Jul 1998 | A |
5781975 | Wells, Jr. et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5815891 | Students et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5890265 | Christian et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
6076234 | Khokhar et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6745439 | Brownlee et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
Entry |
---|
Office Action issued in Reexam U.S. Appl. No. 09/008,800 on Feb. 11, 2008. |
Office Action issued in Reexam U.S. Appl. No. 09/080,800 on May 21, 2008. |
Decision on Appeal issued in Reexam U.S. Appl. No. 09/008,800 on Jan. 31, 2011. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09855917 | May 2001 | US |
Child | 13074812 | US |