The field of invention relates generally to optical communication systems and, more specifically but not exclusively relates to enhanced tunable lasers and methods for calibrating tuning characteristics of such tunable lasers.
There is an increasing demand for tunable lasers for test and measurement uses, wavelength characterization of optical components, fiberoptic networks and other applications. In dense wavelength division multiplexing (DWDM) fiberoptic systems, multiple separate data streams propagate concurrently in a single optical fiber, with each data stream created by the modulated output of a laser at a specific channel frequency or wavelength. Presently, channel separations of approximately 0.4 nanometers in wavelength, or about 50 GHz are achievable, which allows up to 128 channels to be carried by a single fiber within the bandwidth range of currently available fibers and fiber amplifiers. Greater bandwidth requirements will likely result in smaller channel separation in the future.
DWDM systems have largely been based on distributed feedback (DFB) lasers operating with a reference etalon associated in a feedback control loop, with the reference etalon defining the ITU wavelength grid. Statistical variation associated with the manufacture of individual DFB lasers results in a distribution of channel center wavelengths across the wavelength grid, and thus individual DFB transmitters are usable only for a single channel or a small number of adjacent channels.
Continuously tunable external cavity lasers have been developed to overcome the limitations of individual DFB devices. Various laser-tuning mechanisms have been developed to provide external cavity wavelength selection, such as mechanically tuned gratings used in transmission and reflection. External cavity lasers must be able to provide a stable, single mode output at selectable wavelengths while effectively suppress lasing associated with all other external cavity modes that are within the gain bandwidth of the cavity. At the same time, the lasers should be easily tunable to a standard communication channel, such as a channel within the ITU wavelength grid.
The foregoing aspects and many of the attendant advantages of this invention will become more readily appreciated as the same becomes better understood by reference to the following detailed description, when taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals refer to like parts throughout the various views unless otherwise specified:
a is a schematic diagram of a generalized external cavity laser for which various embodiments of the invention may be derived in accordance with the teachings and principles disclosed herein;
b is a schematic diagram illustrating a laser cavity defined by a partially-reflective front facet of a Fabry-Perot gain chip and a reflective element;
Embodiments of methods for calibrating tunable lasers are described herein. In the following description, numerous specific details are set forth to provide a thorough understanding of embodiments of the invention. One skilled in the relevant art will recognize, however, that the invention can be practiced without one or more of the specific details, or with other methods, components, materials, etc. In other instances, well-known structures, materials, or operations are not shown or described in detail to avoid obscuring aspects of the invention.
Reference throughout this specification to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the present invention. Thus, the appearances of the phrases “in one embodiment” or “in an embodiment” in various places throughout this specification are not necessarily all referring to the same embodiment. Furthermore, the particular features, structures, or characteristics may be combined in any suitable manner in one or more embodiments.
Discrete wavelength tunable diode lasers typically comprise a semiconductor gain medium, two reflectors, and an intra-cavity tuning mechanism. For example, as an overview, a generalized embodiment of an external cavity diode laser (ECDL) 100 is shown in
The basic operation of ECDL 100 is a follows. A controllable current I is supplied to diode gain chip 102 (the gain medium), resulting in a voltage differential across the diode junction, which produces an emission of optical energy (photons). The emitted photons pass back and forth between partially-reflective front facet 104 and reflective element 114, which collectively define the ends of an “effective” laser cavity (i.e., the two reflectors discussed above), as depicted by laser cavity 126 in
Light comprising the photons that exit the laser cavity through partially-reflective front facet 104 passes through diode output collimating lens 116, which collimates the light into output beam 122. The output beam then passes through optical isolator 118. The optical isolator is employed to prevent back-reflected light from being passed back into the external laser cavity, and is generally an optional element. After the light beam passes through the optical isolator, it is launched into the output fiber 124 by fiber focusing lens 120. Generally, output fiber 124 may comprise a polarization-preserving type or a single-mode type such as SMF-28.
Through appropriate modulation of the input current (generally for communication rates of up to 2.5 GHz) or through modulation of an external element disposed in the optical path of the output beam (not shown) (for 10 GHz and 40 GHz communication rates), data can be modulated on the output beam to produce an optical data signal. Such a signal may be launched into a fiber and transmitted over a fiber-based network in accordance with practices well known in the optical communication arts, thereby providing very high bandwidth communication capabilities.
The lasing mode of an ECDL is a function of the total optical path length between the cavity ends (the cavity optical path length); that is, the optical path length encountered as the light passes through the various optical elements and spaces between those elements and the cavity ends defined by partially-reflective front facet 104 and reflective element 114. This includes diode gain chip 102, diode intracavity collimating lens 108, tuning filter element(s) 110, plus the path lengths between the optical elements (i.e., the path length of the transmission medium occupying the ECDL cavity, which is typically a gas such as air). More precisely, the total optical path length is the sum of the path lengths through each optical element and the transmission medium times the coefficient of refraction for that element or medium.
As discussed above, under a lasing mode, photons pass back and forth between the cavity end reflectors at a resonance frequency, which is a function of the cavity optical path length. In fact, without the tuning filter elements, the laser would resonate at multiple frequencies. Longitudinal laser modes occur at each frequency where the roundtrip phase accumulation is an exact multiple of 2π. For simplicity, if we model the laser cavity as a Fabry-Perot cavity, these frequencies can be determined from the following equation:
where λ=wavelength, L=optical length of the cavity, x=an arbitrary integer×1, 2, 3, . . . , and n=refractive index of the medium. The average frequency spacing can be derived from equation (1) to yield:
where frequency v=c/λ and c is the speed of light. The number of resonant frequencies is determined from the width of the gain spectrum. The corresponding lasing modes for the cavity resonant frequencies are commonly referred to as “cavity modes,” an example of which is depicted by cavity modes 200 in
Semiconductor laser gain media typically have broad gain spectra and therefore require spectral filtering to achieve longitudinal mode operations (i.e., operations at a single wavelength or frequency). In order to produce an output at a single frequency, filtering mechanisms are employed to substantially attenuate all lasing modes except for the lasing mode corresponding to the desired frequency. As discussed above, in one scheme a pair of etalons, depicted as a grid generator 111 and a channel selector 112 in
A set of transmission peaks 202 corresponding to an exemplary etalon grid generator is shown in
As discussed above, a channel selector, such as an adjustable etalon, is employed to select the lasing mode of the laser output. For illustrative purposes, in one embodiment channel selector 112 may comprise an etalon having a width substantially less than the etalon employed for the grid generator. In this case, the FSR of the channel selector is also substantially greater than that of the grid generator; thus the bandpass waveform of the channel selector is broadened, as illustrated by channel selector bandpass waveform 204 having a single transmission peak 206. In accordance with this channel selection technique, a desired channel can be selected by aligning the transmission peak of the channel selector (e.g. 206) with one of the transmission peaks of the grid generator. For example, in the illustrated configuration depicted in
In addition to the foregoing scheme, several other channel selecting mechanisms may be implemented, including rotating a diffraction grating; electrically adjusting a tunable liquid crystal etalon; mechanically translating a wedge-shaped etalon (thereby adjusting its effective cavity length); and “Vernier” tuning, wherein etalons of the same finesses and slightly different FSRs are employed, and a respective pair of transmission peaks from among the transmission peaks defined by the etalons are aligned to select the channel in a manner similar to that employed when using a Vernier scale. An illustration of the transmission characteristics of a pair of etalon filters used to facilitate Vernier tuning is shown in
Note that in the illustrated example of
Under one technique, the transmission characteristics of the filters are “tuned” by controlling the temperature of each filter. Changing the temperature of a filter causes its optical characteristics to change in a manner that shifts the location of the filter's transmission peaks. For example, the index of refraction of some filter materials may be changed by changing the temperature of the filter. In other cases, a change in temperature changes the thickness of the filter. In other situations a combined effect is produced. The result is that the optical path length of the Fabry-Perot etalon changes, thus altering its transmission characteristics.
The conventional technique for calibrating similar lasers that employ thermally-tunable etalons, as well as wavelength lockers employing similar filters is to servo the tuning mechanism (e.g., filter temperatures) until the correct wavelength is achieved and then record the immediate tuning parameters in a lookup table. This method has been shown to be too slow and too costly. For example, this foregoing calibration sequence must be repeated 84 times for a laser designed to be used in the 84-channel C-band spectrum. The technique may also be prone to inaccuracies resulting from using improper or incorrect input parameters for a given channel, for example
The embodiments of the invention describe herein employ equations to model the behavior of the laser's of entire range of accessible wavelengths and powers. Mathematical (e.g., physical model) equations employing various parameters are used to model the behavior, with the parameters being determined during calibration processes. The parameters and the same or related equations embodied as firmware are then stored on-board the laser and used during subsequent operations to tune the laser to selected channels and operate the laser at selected power levels. For convenience, these equations are generally referred to as “physical model equations” or “modeling equations” herein.
It is further noted that the equations presented below are not limited to physical model equations. In some cases, an equation is based on a corresponding physical model. In other cases, the equations are simply polynomial equations that may or may not be representative of a corresponding physical model. In other instances, the equations are simplifications of a physical model, wherein less-complex equations are used for practical purposes.
Overall, each of the foregoing types of equations perform a similar purpose. That purpose is to employ a single equation whose variables are valid over the entire operating range of a laser. As such, the single equation may be employed in place of conventional approaches, such as lookup tables. Furthermore, any position on a function's curve may be derived directly from the corresponding equation, without the need for performing linear or cubic interpolations between lookup points in a table.
An overview of the calibration process is illustrated by the flowchart of
In order to better understand the following calibration processes, the processes will be described in connection with an exemplary ECLD 500 shown in
In general, temperature control of the sled will be used for very fine tuning adjustments, while coarser tuning adjustments will be made by means of tuning filter elements 110. In the illustrated embodiment, tuning filter elements 110 comprise first and second tunable filters F1 and F2. In one embodiment, filters F1 and F2 comprise respective thermally-tunable etalons, either made of a solid material or being gas filled. In one embodiment, filter tuning is effectuated by changing the optical path length of each etalon. This, in turn, may be induced by changing the temperature of the etalons.
For example, ECDL 500 shows details of an exemplary channel selection subsystem. The subsystem includes a controller 520 that interfaces with a wavelength selection control block 542. It is noted that although the wavelength selection control block is shown external to controller 520, the control aspects of this block may be provided by the controller alone. In response to an input channel command 544, the controller and/or wavelength selection control block adjust the tuning filter element(s) so as to produce a lasing mode corresponding to the desired channel frequency (or equivalent wavelength). Wavelength selection control block 542 provides electrical outputs 504 and 506 for controlling the temperatures of filters F1 and F2, respectively. In one embodiment, a temperature control element is disposed around the perimeter of a circular etalon, as depicted by TECs 508 and 510. Respective RTDs 512 and 514 are employed to provide a temperature feedback signal back to wavelength selection control block 542.
Generally, etalons are employed in laser cavities to provide filtering functions. As discussed above, they essentially function as Fabry-Perot resonators, and provide a filtering function defining a set of transmission peaks in the laser output. The FSR spacing of the transmission peaks is dependent on the distance between the two faces of the etalon, e.g., faces 516 and 518 for filter F1, and faces 520 and 522 for filter F2. As the temperatures of the etalons change, the etalon material is caused to expand or contract, thus causing the distance between the faces to change. Also, as discussed above, the change in temperature may alter the index of refraction for an etalon, or a combined effect may result. This effectively changes the optical path length of the etalons, which may be employed to shift the transmission peaks.
The effect of the filters is cumulative. As a result, all lasing modes except for a selected channel lasing mode can be substantially attenuated by lining up a single transmission peak of each filter. In one embodiment, the configurations of the two etalons are selected such that the respective fee spectral ranges of the etalons are slightly different. This enables transmission peaks to be aligned under a Vernier tuning technique similar to that employed by a Vernier scale, such as shown in
In general, embodiments of the tunable ECDLs described herein may employ a wavelength-locking (also referred to as channel-locking) scheme so as to maintain the laser output at a selected channel frequency (and thus at a corresponding predetermined wavelength). Typically, this may be provided via a “phase modulation” scheme, wherein the optical path length of the laser cavity is modulated at a relatively low frequency (e.g., 500 Hz-20 KHz) at a small frequency excursion. In one embodiment, an optical path length modulator 513 is employed for this purpose. In response to a modulated wavelength locking excitation signal 521 generated by controller 520 and amplified by an amplifier 523, the optical path length of modulator 513 is caused to modulate, thereby inducing a wavelength modulation and in the laser's output. Generally, the optical path length modulator may comprise an element that changes its optical path length in response to an electrical input, such as a Lithium Niobate (LiNbO3) phase modulator. Lithium Niobate is a material that changes its index of refraction (ratio of the speed of light through the material divided by the speed of light through a vacuum) when a voltage is applied across it. As a result, by providing a modulated voltage signal across the LiNbO3 phase modulator, the optical path length of the external laser cavity can be caused to modulate. Other means of modulating the optical path length of the laser cavity may be employed as well, such as modulating the location of reflective element 114 (e.g., via a MEMS mirror or a reflector coupled to a piezo-electric actuator). Another technique is to employ a gain medium with a phase control section that changes its optical path length in response to an injected current.
As is well-known in the art, when the laser's output has a frequency that is centered on a channel frequency (in accordance with appropriately configured filter elements), the laser intensity is maximized relative to non-centered outputs. As a result, the wavelength modulation produces an intensity modulation having an amplitude indicative of how off-center the lasing mode is. A corresponding feedback signal may then be generated that is received by controller 520 and processed to adjust the overall cavity length via a sled temperature control signal 530.
For example, in the illustrated embodiment of
Controller 520 includes a digital servo loop (e.g., phase lock loop) that is configured to adjust the temperature of sled 516 such that the amplitude modulation of the light intensity detected at photodetector 526 is minimized, in accordance with a typical intensity vs. frequency curve for a given channel and corresponding filter characteristics. In an optional embodiment, the junction voltage across gain diode chip (VJ) is employed as the intensity feedback signal, rather than PD. An error signal is then derived by based on the amplitude modulation and phase of PD or VJ in combination with modulated signal 522. In response to the error signal, an appropriate adjustment in temperature control signal 530 is generated. Adjustment of the sled temperature causes a corresponding change in the overall (continuous) cavity length, and thus the lasing frequency. This in turn results in (ideally) a decrease in the difference between the lasing frequency and the desired channel frequency, thus completing the control loop. To reach an initial condition, or for a second feedback signal, a RDT 732, such as a thermister or thermocouple, may be used to provide a temperature feedback signal 534 to controller 520.
In general, controller 520 may include one or more analog-to-digital (A/D) converters, or separate A/D converters may be employed. Although photodiode current and gain medium current measurements are described herein, it is noted that these measurements are ultimately made by using appropriate circuitry to convert the currents into voltage level signals, which in turn are measured using the A/D converter(s).
The RTD calibration operation of block 302 is used to calibrate the RTD temperature sensors 512 and 514 used for each of the etalon filters F1 and F2. RTDs are thermal devices that measure temperature via a change in their resistance, hence the name resistive thermal device. RTDs are made of many different materials, with certain materials being targets for corresponding temperature ranges. In one embodiment, platinum RTDs are used in the laser to measure the etalon temperatures.
There is a nearly linear dependence between resistance and temperature of platinum over the operating range of the etalons. Accordingly, the resistance R is modeled by the following equation:
R=R25+α*(T−25) (3)
wherein the parameters being solved for include R25, which is the resistance of the RTD at 25° C., and α is the linearity constant. The variables are R, which is the resistance converted from an A/D converter, and T, the temperature.
Referring to the flowchart of
In a start loop block 602, the temperature of sled 516 is varied by adjusting the current to TEC 518 via temperature control signal 530. In a block 604, the sled temperature and the RTD resistance for each of RTDs 512 and 514 is recorded. In one embodiment, a thermister is attached to sled 516, and a corresponding calibration curve is used establish the sled temperature via the thermister. In other embodiments, other external temperature measurements may be employed for calibration purposes. As depicted by start and end loop blocks 602 and 606, the operations in a block 604 are performed over a number of different temperatures. An exemplary set of temperatures and resistances are shown in
After recording RTD resistances at a number of different temperatures, the values for parameters R25 and a are derived in a block 608. In one embodiment, the value for R25 is simply derived from the resistance of the RTD resistance measured when the sled temperature is at 25° C. In other embodiments, the value for R25 may be interpolated from other sled temperature and RTD resistance measurements. In one embodiment, a least squares fit is used to derive a based on the calibration test data, as is well-known in the mathematical arts.
Equation 3 defines a linear model for modeling the temperature of a filter based on its RTD measurement. In another embodiment, a more complex model, such as a quadratic model may be used. Techniques for deriving quadratic model parameters from two-input variable calibration test are well-known, and as such, a description of this process is not discussed herein. In general, the linear model is advantageous over a quadratic model with respect to computational efficiency. Meanwhile, the quadratic model is generally more accurate. However, since platinum RTDs exhibit a very linear resistance vs. temperature behavior, a linear model has shown to be sufficiently accurate for temperature measurements. Furthermore, there are no laser performance parameters that depend critically on the accuracy of the temperature scale.
Returning to
wherein q is an integer.
In view of equation 4 and other considerations, the transmission characteristics of the filters are modeled by the following equation:
The foregoing equation defines four fit parameters for each filter: A, B, q0 and L. The variables includes v, the optical frequency, T, the filter temperature, and dq, the relative peak integer. n(λ, T), the index of refraction for the etalon material at a corresponding wavelength and temperature, is a constant that can be obtained for existing tables for the material used for the etalons. In one embodiment, the etalons are made of silicon. Physically, the fit parameters correspond to the absolute mode number q0 of the relative mode 0, the etalon thickness L, and corrections to the slope (A) and curvature (B) of the temperature scale.
Referring to the flowchart of
In block 804, the difference between the filter temperatures, T1−T2, is adjusted until a maximum power value for the closest filter mode (e.g., closest combined filter transmission peak) is obtained, using a dither servo on the filter temperature difference in a similar manner to that described above for wavelength locking. In one embodiment, the power measurement is made by photodetector 526, which produces a photodiode current PD that is proportional to the optical power received at the photodiode. This, in turn, is indicative of the optical power of the laser's output (measured internally). Once the maximum power filter configuration is reached, the frequency and filter temperatures for the corresponding dq value are recorded in block 806.
The next measurement cycle is then initiated in block 808, wherein the filter temperature difference T1−T2 is adjusted to “hop” the laser to the next filter mode. In one embodiment, this is obtained by increasing the temperature difference by a predetermined value. Furthermore, in one embodiment, the increase in filter temperature difference is obtained by concurrently increasing the temperature of one filter while decreasing the temperature of the other. This technique is particularly applicable under the Vernier tuning configuration discussed above. The value of dq is also incremented by one prior to performing the next measurement cycle.
As shown in
After the measurements have been made, the parameters A, B, q0 and L are derived from the measurement data using least squares fit between the data and the parameterized model, as depicted in a block 812. The process is completed in a block 814, wherein the laser tuning equation,
T=T(v, dq, A, B, L, q0) (6)
Is solved for T and is programmed into the system's firmware, while the calibrated parameters (A, B, q0 and L) are stored in a non-volatile store, such as Flash memory. In one embodiment, the calibrated parameters are stored along with firmware for the laser in a firmware store 524. Generally, firmware store 524 is representative of a non-volatile storage device that is either on-board the laser or an external device that is accessible to the laser via an appropriate communication link. In other embodiments, the calibration parameters and firmware may be stored in separate storage devices, either on-board the laser or comprising a combination of on-board and external storage devices. In one embodiment, the calibration parameters are stored in an external memory that is accessible to the laser via a standard or proprietary communication link. In yet another embodiment, the calibration parameters are stored on an external computer that is linked in communication with the laser via an appropriate communication interface, such as a network interface, serial interface, or the like.
In addition to wavelength calibration, the PI curve calibration process of block 406 is performed. This is used to calculate the estimated start gain medium current (Istart) based on the photodiode power target and the tuning frequency target. This estimated start current is used to set the initial operating point for power control. Immediately after the estimated current is set, current adjustments by the power control servo begins. In one embodiment, the calibration data for wavelength calibration and PI curve calibration data are measured at the same time.
The PI curve is modeled using the following equation:
The parameters for the PI curve calibration model include Ir, a0, a1, a2, a3, b0, b1, b2, and b3. Ir is a quadratic parameter describing the thermal rollover of the PI curve. In one embodiment, Ir is a scaled in units of mA (milliamps). The remaining parameters a0, a1, a2, a3, b0, b1, b2, and b3 are quadratic parameters. The variables include v, the optical frequency, I, the gain medium current, and PD, the photodiode current. Ith is the threshold current for the gain medium.
Referring to the flowchart of
In block 1004 the frequency v and current I are varied. In block 1006, the frequency, current and photodiode current (PD) values are recorded, generating a table with like columns, as shown in
Returning to
In one embodiment, the following power calibration polynomial equation is used:
PD=P*d0*(1+d1*v+d2*v2+d3*v3) (10)
wherein the parameters include d0, d1, d2, and d3, and the input variables are the optical frequency v, the output power P, and the photodiode current PD.
Referring to the flowchart of
In block 1304 the frequency v is varied, while keeping the current constant. In block 1306, the frequency (v), output power (P) and photodiode current (PD) values are recorded, generating a table with like-named columns, as shown in
Once the foregoing calibration processes are completed, the laser is ready for field operations. During these operations, execution of firmware on-board the laser loads the parameters and equations into their corresponding functions, and then the functions are executed to assist tuning of the laser. The equations, which interpolate performance over an entire range of applicable input variables, provide accurate models of the laser's performance.
Referring to
In conjunction with the firmware load, the calibration parameters derived above are loaded into firmware functions that comprise runtime functions corresponding to the foregoing calibration equations described above. In other words, the firmware functions used during ongoing laser operations may employ the same or different equations than those used to derive corresponding calibration parameters, examples of which are presented below.
After the laser is initialized, it is ready for ongoing use. During this phase of operations, the laser will typically be tuned to one or more communication channels (i.e., predetermined frequency/wavelength based on a standard communication grid, such as ITU). As depicted by start and end loop blocks 1502 and 1512, the operations of blocks 1504, 1506, 1508 and 1510 are performed in response to each channel change (e.g., input channel command 544), including tuning to a first channel.
In response to a tuning command, an estimated gain medium start current ISTART is calculated in a block 1504 using the PI curve calibration parameters derived above and a corresponding PI curve function implementing such parameters via execution of firmware instructions. The input values for the function include a target photodiode current PDTARGET and the tuning frequency v.
In a block 1506, the wavelength calibration parameters derived above are used to calculate the filter temperatures T1 and T2 corresponding to the requested tuning frequency v (or wavelength λ). As discussed above, in the operations of block 814, the laser tuning equation,
T=T(v, dq; A, B, L, q0) (6)
is solved for T and is programmed into the system's firmware, while the calibration parameters (A, B, q0 and L) are stored in a non-volatile store. Accordingly, the first operation for wavelength (frequency) tuning is to select which peak, parameterized by dq in the equation 5, should be used to thermally tune to the target wavelength. This is selected by treating the mode number, q0, as a variable in the equation,
and putting a nominal target tuning temperature for T (for each of T1 and T2) and the target frequency for v. This will lead to a fractional value being returned for dq—the nearest peak is selected by rounding this fractional value to an integer. This integer peak, dq, is then inserted back into equation 6 and solved for T.
Once the laser has been initially tuned to a channel, wavelength locking and power control operations are performed on an ongoing basis to keep the channel wavelength (and frequency) locked, while maintaining the laser output at a desired level. In one embodiment, as depicted by the operations of block 1508, a wavelength-locking loop employs a phase dither to induce a modulation in the output of the laser. This will produce a change in transmission characteristics, which can be detected using a feedback signal comprising the photodiode current PD or a change in the gain medium voltage junction VJ. Meanwhile, a power control loop is employed in block 1510 to maintain the laser's power output at a desired level. This power control loop employs a servo error derived from the difference between the photodiode current measurement PD and the target photodiode current PDTARGET (as determined from the power calibration function using the desired output power P as frequency v as inputs).
In general, firmware discussed herein will be embodied as machine-executable instructions that are executed by some form of processing core, such as a processor, micro-controller, etc. Thus, embodiments of this invention may be used as or to support a software program executed upon some form of processing core or otherwise implemented or realized upon or within a machine-readable medium. A machine-readable medium includes any mechanism for storing or transmitting information in a form readable by a machine (e.g., a computer). For example, a machine-readable medium can include such as a read only memory (ROM); a random access memory (RAM); a magnetic disk storage media; an optical storage media; and a flash memory device, etc. In addition, a machine-readable medium can include propagated signals such as electrical, optical, acoustical or other form of propagated signals (e.g., carrier waves, infrared signals, digital signals, etc.).
The calibration techniques described herein provide several advantages over the conventional schemes that employ lookup tables. There are no specialized test points, such as ITU frequencies, which need to be reached during the calibration processes. During operations, all frequencies can be tuned to with the same performance as the ITU frequencies, increasing flexibility. Additionally, a lookup table can “freeze” in the noise at a given look up point. To test the performance of the lookup table (looking for tuning errors), every point must be investigated. With fewer degrees of freedom, an equation-based calibration can be verified by testing fewer points.
The calibration techniques also employ fewer free parameters. Thus, less data is required to determine those parameters, reducing calibration time. Furthermore, less data is required to verify laser performance, thus reducing test time. Since the free parameters are determined using least square fit schemes, excellent noise cancellation is obtained (square root of N reduction, where N is the number of data points). This reduces the need to average data for accurate calibration, also reducing calibration time. As an illustration of the techniques effectiveness and accuracy,
Furthermore, in the foregoing description of the embodiments, values for PD, I, R, and T are measured in terms of physical units by scaling corresponding A/D measurements. This is not meant to be limiting, but merely one scheme for implementing calibration of the corresponding equations. In general, the techniques disclosed herein may also be employed without requiring measurements to be scaled into units. For example, abstract values derived directly from the A/D measurements may be employed.
The above description of illustrated embodiments of the invention, including what is described in the Abstract, is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. While specific embodiments of, and examples for, the invention are described herein for illustrative purposes, various equivalent modifications are possible within the scope of the invention, as those skilled in the relevant art will recognize.
These modifications can be made to the invention in light of the above detailed description. The terms used in the following claims should not be construed to limit the invention to the specific embodiments disclosed in the specification and the drawings. Rather, the scope of the invention is to be determined entirely by the following claims, which are to be construed in accordance with established doctrines of claim interpretation.