Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to a windrow merger apparatus and a method of merging windrows, and in particular relates to a windrow merging apparatus with a head having cams that slow the tines during pick up and speed the tines when releasing material.
Description of the Prior Art
Devices for merging windrows in the field are well known to gather material such as cut hay, alfalfa and other crops that might be merged into windrows for further processing such as chopping and/or harvesting. Windrow mergers typically include one or more heads to move the material to a single row at one side of the merger. Such mergers typically include tines that rotate and pick up the material from the ground and throw it rearward onto aligned conveyors that convey the material laterally to form a windrow.
Although mergers generally perform in a satisfactory manner and provide satisfactory pickup and conveyance into windrows, for certain conditions, problems may occur. In order to pick up the material and propel it onto the conveyor, the tines must move at a sufficient speed to throw the material onto the conveyor belt. If the speed of the tines at the top of the rotation when the picked up material is propelled rearward is too slow, the material may simply fall off the tine or only be propelled to the front portion of the belt so that clumping may occur. However, if the speed is increased to pick up and propel wet or heavier material from the ground, the tines move quickly at the point of engagement and lifting from the ground. At these higher speeds at the point of engagement, the material tends to be propelled forward, making it more difficult to pick up. Higher engagement speeds may damage the material being picked up and lessen its nutritional value. Moreover, in order to avoid higher speeds, it may be necessary to advance the merger more slowly along the field, thereby decreasing capacity and performance.
To overcome such problems, it can be appreciated that it would be advantageous if the material could be picked up from the ground while the tines are moving at a relatively slow speed, while the tines move at a faster speed at the top of the rotation to propel the material more reliably rearward and spread out the material onto the front and rear areas of the belt. Moreover, it can be appreciated that if a wider belt could be utilized, the material may be spread out more evenly and avoid clumping. Furthermore, if the belt could be angled downward from front to rear, the material would generally fall away from the leading edge of the belt and naturally spread the material more evenly across the width of the belt. By loading the rear of the conveyor first, the front portion of the belt adjacent the pickup head remains open to allow the material to slide along the guards of the heads and onto the belt. Such a configuration would increase capacity, especially when combined with a rearward angled belt. The present invention addresses these as well as other problems associated with windrow mergers.
The present invention is directed to a windrow merger and in particular to a windrow merger having pickup and transfer assemblies with enhanced material pickup and dispersal for improved operation at higher speeds and capacities. The windrow merger includes a frame and one or more heads. The merger may be self-propelled or configured to be towed behind a tractor or other tow vehicle. There may be multiple heads that are laterally aligned to form a continuous pickup face to transport material continuously to either end of the aligned heads.
Each of the pickup and transfer heads includes a pickup assembly with rotating tines spaced along and about a periphery of the pickup assembly. The tines are spaced longitudinally transverse to a direction of travel and also spaced about a periphery of the pickup assembly. The tines rotate about an axis extending laterally relative to the direction of travel. Flexible guards arc around the front face of the pickup and transfer head and spaced apart so that tine rotate between adjacent guards.
Each of the heads also includes a conveyor belt to the rear of the pickup assembly that transports material laterally. A shroud is positioned at the rear of the belt and extends upward to direct material propelled against the shroud to fall back onto the belt. Moreover, the conveyor belt has an upper surface that is angled downward and rearward relative to the direction of travel and away from the pickup assembly. In one embodiment, the surface of the belt is angled downward at approximately 5 degrees.
The pickup assemblies include cams that change the speed of the tines as they rotate through various sections of the rotational path. The tines are mounted on bars, which connect via tabs to rollers engaging the cam. The tabs are adjustable so that the angle of the tines relative to the roller is adjustable. The cam includes portions that are spaced further from the axis of rotation so that rotational speed is slowed while the tines ride over the widening portions of the cams. Other sections have a reducing radius to the axis of rotation so that the rotational speed is relatively higher at these portions.
In one embodiment, the cam has an area of increasing radius proximate a forward lower portion of the pickup assembly so that the speed of the tines is slowed as the tines engage and pick up material from the ground. This provides for more gentle handling of the material. The cam also includes a reducing radius portion along the forward and upper portion of the path of rotation of the pickup assembly so that the speed of the tines increases through this section and is relatively fast to propel the material further rearward as the tines reach the top portion of the rotational path where the material is jettisoned from the tines. The additionally increased speed provides for propelling the material at a greater distance and spreads the material more evenly over a widened belt. In addition, the downward angled belt to the rear further disperses the material more evenly over the width of the conveyor belts. The slower pickup speeds while still propelling material more evenly over a widened belt minimizes clumping and allows for operating at greater speeds and increases capacity.
The merger heads also include a suspension system with a linkage connecting skids at opposite ends of each head in a master and slave relationship so that only a single hydraulic cylinder is required for a mechanism that controls both skids.
These features of novelty and various other advantages that characterize the invention are pointed out with particularity in the claims annexed hereto and forming a part hereof. However, for a better understanding of the invention, its advantages, and the objects obtained by its use, reference should be made to the drawings that form a further part hereof, and to the accompanying descriptive matter, in which there is illustrated and described a preferred embodiment of the invention.
Referring now to the drawings, wherein like reference letters and numerals indicate corresponding structure throughout the several views:
Referring now to the drawings and in particular to
The merger apparatus (100) includes a chassis (102) and an operator cab (104) at a front of the chassis, and three pickup and transfer assemblies (20). The cab (104) includes the steering and the other controls for driving the merger and operating the pickup and transfer assemblies (20). In the embodiment shown, the merger chassis (102) is supported on front drive wheels (106) and rear wheels (108). The merger (100) includes a motor (110) placed at the rear of the chassis (102). The pickup and transfer assemblies (20) form a continuous lateral transport path at the front of the merger (100). The lateral transport path provides for merging hay and other materials into windrows for further processing or harvesting. The pickup and transfer assemblies (20) are foldable via a folding system (112) including curved arms for the outer pickup and transfer assemblies to reconfigure the merger (100) for transport, as shown in
Each of the pickup and transfer assemblies (20), as also shown more clearly in
The conveyor assembly (24) of each pickup and transfer assembly (20) is positioned to the rear of the material pickup head (22) and includes a conveyor belt (34) and a shroud (32) to the rear of the conveyor belt (34) that folds between a raised position and a position against the belt (34). The conveyor belt (34) is reversible to deliver material transverse to the direction of travel. In the embodiment shown, the conveyor belt (34) has a widened configuration as compared to prior art mergers with a width of approximately 42 inches as compared to 35 inches for conventional mergers. However, other belt widths are also foreseen and would also work sufficiently. Moreover, the upper face of the belt (34) is angled slightly rearward such as 5 degrees downward. The rearward slant and the additional width increase capacity and help to prevent unwanted accumulations on the belt and more even distribution of materials.
Each of the pickup and transfer assemblies (20) is supported on a suspension system (40). The suspension system (40) includes skids (42), as also shown in
The conveyor (24) is supported on a frame (52) extending along the edges of the conveyor belt, as shown in
Referring now to
As shown most clearly in
The rollers (62) are supported on tabs (64) that connect to the bars (66). The tabs (64) provide for angling the bars (66) relative to the rollers (62) so that the angle of the tines (26) is optimized. It can be appreciated that the particular angle may be adjusted. In the embodiment shown, the tab (64) is at an angle of approximately 60 degrees relative to the orientation of the tine (26), but other angles may also provide satisfactory results.
The cam (60) forms different sections along its surface and for the channel (68). A first lower section of the cam (80) has a first radial distance to the center of rotation (70). Therefore, the speed of the rollers (62) and therefore the tines (26) is constant at the lower section (80). This decreased speed of the tines (26) when picking up material reduces the forward motion of the material and improves material flow. Moreover, reduced speed is gentler on the material being lifted from the field and decreases damage to the material and reduces loss of nutrient value. At the front portion of the cam (60) is a second transition section (82). After the rollers would reach this point, the radial distance to the center of rotation (70) of the cam surface begins to decrease. Therefore, the roller speed begins to decelerate. After passing beyond the transition section (82), the rollers engage an outer section of the cam periphery having an increasing radius. Therefore, the speed of the tines accelerates. As the rollers (62) travel to the top of the travel path of the periphery of the cam (60), the radial distance to the center of rotation (70) increases to a maximum at a top section (86). The acceleration of the tines (26) is sufficient to propel the material rearward with enough force to propel material picked up from the field to the rear of the conveyor belt (24). The rollers (62) then continue to travel along the periphery of the cam (60) at a rear section (88). In the embodiment shown, the rear section (88) has a concave shape that occupies less space.
With the cam configuration shown, the present invention is able to operate at a higher speed while achieving a gentler pickup of material due to lower tine speed at the point of pickup and also achieves a greater spread with material dispersed more evenly on the belt due to the higher speed and acceleration of the tines (26) as they reach a point where the material is propelled rearward. The angle of the tines (26) is also optimized to pick up a greater percentage of material from the field while leaving rocks, dirt and other debris. Moreover, with the upper surface of the conveyor belt (34) being angled slightly downward toward the rear, a greater spread is obtained and there is less gathering of material at the front of the conveyor belt and more even spreading of material into windrows leading to achieving greater capacity even at lower speeds.
Referring now to
Each of the pickup and transfer assemblies (20) of the tow behind windrow merger (200) includes a material pickup assembly (22) and a conveyor assembly (24). Each pickup and transfer assembly includes a folding shroud (32). It can be appreciated that the shroud (32) on the outer pickup and transfer assemblies (20) folds generally against the conveyor assembly (24). The center pickup and transfer assembly (20) generally lifts up as shown in
Each of the pickup and transfer assemblies (20) of the towable windrow merger (200) also includes a cam (60) shown in
It is to be understood, however, that even though numerous characteristics and advantages of the present invention have been set forth in the foregoing description, together with details of the structure and function of the invention, the disclosure is illustrative only, and changes may be made in detail, especially in matters of shape, size and arrangement of parts within the principles of the invention to the full extent indicated by the broad general meaning of the terms in which the appended claims are expressed.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1847399 | Innes | Mar 1932 | A |
1877519 | MacGregor | Sep 1932 | A |
1877770 | Larson | Sep 1932 | A |
2168266 | McElwain | Aug 1939 | A |
2195381 | Patterson | Mar 1940 | A |
2343583 | Rogers | Mar 1944 | A |
2967584 | Westerlund | Jan 1961 | A |
3177638 | Johnson | Apr 1965 | A |
3190392 | Ashton et al. | Jun 1965 | A |
3214002 | Kirkpatrick et al. | Oct 1965 | A |
3240005 | Rowse | Mar 1966 | A |
3404517 | Whitfied | Oct 1968 | A |
3468107 | van der Lely | Sep 1969 | A |
3472008 | Hurlburt | Oct 1969 | A |
3508627 | Lypko et al. | Apr 1970 | A |
3515408 | Cagle | Jun 1970 | A |
3650096 | Caldwell | Mar 1972 | A |
3656578 | Hemken | Apr 1972 | A |
3695015 | Twidale et al. | Oct 1972 | A |
3709360 | Baker | Jan 1973 | A |
3714766 | Ender et al. | Feb 1973 | A |
3751888 | James | Aug 1973 | A |
3754383 | Burrough | Aug 1973 | A |
3849974 | James | Nov 1974 | A |
3897832 | Leedahl et al. | Aug 1975 | A |
3940910 | d'Acremont | Mar 1976 | A |
4042044 | Honnold | Aug 1977 | A |
4058170 | Ankenman et al. | Nov 1977 | A |
4081946 | Ehrhart | Apr 1978 | A |
4131293 | Kindle | Dec 1978 | A |
4184314 | Hobbs | Jan 1980 | A |
4232747 | Pfenninger et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4245716 | Rayfield | Jan 1981 | A |
4297833 | Gaeddert | Nov 1981 | A |
4346909 | Hundeby | Aug 1982 | A |
4409780 | Beougher et al. | Oct 1983 | A |
4487004 | Kejr | Dec 1984 | A |
4512140 | Blakeslee | Apr 1985 | A |
4573309 | Patterson | Mar 1986 | A |
4621487 | Urlacher et al. | Nov 1986 | A |
4658572 | Honey et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4700784 | Wiebe et al. | Oct 1987 | A |
4738092 | Jennings | Apr 1988 | A |
4768334 | Honey et al. | Sep 1988 | A |
4793129 | Ehrhart et al. | Dec 1988 | A |
4840020 | Oka | Jun 1989 | A |
4896732 | Stark | Jan 1990 | A |
4910951 | Reilly et al. | Mar 1990 | A |
4932196 | Schnittjer | Jun 1990 | A |
4981013 | Underwood | Jan 1991 | A |
5031394 | Honey | Jul 1991 | A |
5111636 | Quirin | May 1992 | A |
5155986 | Kelderman | Oct 1992 | A |
5177944 | Finlay | Jan 1993 | A |
5203154 | Lesher et al. | Apr 1993 | A |
5507139 | Delperdang et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5813494 | Ulschmid et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5848523 | Engel | Dec 1998 | A |
5893262 | Harbach | Apr 1999 | A |
5911625 | von Allwörden | Jun 1999 | A |
5956934 | Wright et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5964077 | Guinn | Oct 1999 | A |
5987861 | Duncan | Nov 1999 | A |
6205757 | Dow et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6212865 | Peeters et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6347686 | Hedley et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354429 | Kuhlmann et al. | Mar 2002 | B2 |
6401440 | Franet et al. | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6415590 | Lohrentz | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6502379 | Snider | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6508050 | Krone | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6591598 | Remillard | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6658828 | Franet | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6688093 | Franet et al. | Feb 2004 | B1 |
6758031 | Franet et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
6775969 | Wuebbels et al. | Aug 2004 | B2 |
6843045 | Bickel | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6862873 | Franet | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6942041 | Kraus et al. | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7310929 | Dow et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7543433 | Hironimus | Jun 2009 | B2 |
7628004 | Geiser | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7650736 | Salley et al. | Jan 2010 | B1 |
7712295 | Walter et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7827774 | Dow et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
8074432 | Hironimus et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8091331 | Dow et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8166739 | Dow et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8186138 | Dow et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8225588 | Hironimus et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8240117 | McClure | Aug 2012 | B1 |
8511052 | Dow et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8863488 | Dow et al. | Oct 2014 | B2 |
20030110752 | Dow | Jun 2003 | A1 |
20040200203 | Dow | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20050126153 | Hironimus et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050172598 | Billard | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20060162308 | Dow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060248870 | Geiser | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254238 | Walter et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254244 | Geiser | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20090241503 | Babler et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090320434 | Pourchet et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100037584 | Dow | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20120247078 | Landon | Oct 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 151 431 | Aug 1983 | CA |
90 14 438.4 | Mar 1991 | DE |
43 41 610 | Jun 1995 | DE |
10 2006 059 797 | Jun 2008 | DE |
0 789 990 | Aug 1997 | EP |
0 827 684 | Mar 1998 | EP |
0 853 872 | Mar 2003 | EP |
2 663 189 | Dec 1991 | FR |
2 852 485 | Sep 2004 | FR |
2 194 422 | Mar 1988 | GB |
835359 | Jun 1981 | SU |
WO-8706793 | Nov 1987 | WO |
WO 2004085115 | Oct 2004 | WO |
Entry |
---|
310 Windrow Merger Parts & Operator's Manual, Publication No. 91192, Fourth Edition, Model Year 2003, 105 pages (Revised Mar. 1, 2006). |
310 Windrow Merger Parts & Operator's Manual, Publication No. 91217, Second Edition, 44 pages (Jul. 2004). |
310 Windrow Merger Parts & Operator's Manual, Publication No. 91244, Fourth Edition, Model Year 2005, 145 pages (Revised Mar. 1, 2006). |
Carr, P. et al., “Barley Versus Oat: Which Makes the Superior Forage Crop,” 2001 Annual Report, Agronomy Section, 3 pages (2001). |
PhiBer Farm Show Magazine, vol. 23, Issue 2, p. 30 (1999). |
Photo of John Orr Windrow Merger, 1 page. |
Resource Magazine's Outstanding Innovations 2004 AE50, 28 pages (Jun./Jul. 2004). |
Rowse Windrow Fluffer Pamphlet, 4 pages. |
Shinners, K.J. et al., “Equipment to Rake and Merge Hay and Forage,” http://www.uwex.edu/ces/forage/wfc/proceedings2003/equipment.htm, 6 pages (2003). |
Snel schud-/harksysteem, Praktijk Mechanisatie, 3 pages (Jul. 21, 2000). |
Srivastava, A. et al., Engineering Principles of Agricultural Machines, Chapter 8 Hay and Forage Harvesting, 84 pages (Jun. 1993). |
Tri-Flex Mergers Operator's Manual, 44 pages (Jan. 15, 2015). |
Complaint with Exhibits A-F, Oxbo International Corp. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-cv-292, 147 pages (May 15, 2015). |
Answer to Plaintiff's Complaint and Counterclaims, Oxbo International Corp. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-cv-292-jdp, 11 pages (Sep. 14, 2015). |
Oxbo's Preliminary Infringement Contentions, Oxbo International Corp. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-cv-292-jdp, 9 pages (Nov. 2, 2015). |
Defendant's Preliminary Invalidity Contentions, Oxbo International Corp. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-cv-292-jdp, 54 pages (Jan. 8, 2016). |
Expert Report of Ralph Shirley, Oxbo International Corp. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. et al., Civil Action No. 15-292-jdp, 25 pages (Apr. 15, 2016). |
Expert Report of Dr. Daniel J. Undersander, Oxbo International Corp. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc.. v. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Oxbo International Corp. and Kuhn North America, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-292-jdp, 145 pages (Apr. 15, 2016). |
Exhibit 11 to Howe Declaration, Civil Action No. 15-cv-00292-jdp, 55 pages (Aug. 30, 2016). |
Exhibit 14 to Howe Declaration, Civil Action No. 15-cv-00292-jdp, 21 pages (Aug. 30, 2016). |
Opinion & Order, Oxbo International Corporation. vs. H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc., Civil Action No. 15-cv-292-jdp, 60 pages (May 23, 2017). |
Declaration of Ralph Shirley, P.E., CFEI, H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Oxbo International Corporation, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 69 pages (Apr. 15, 2016). |
Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 83 pages (Aug. 3, 2016). |
Expert Declaration of Jonathan Chaplin, Ph.D., H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Oxbo International Corporation, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 59 pages (Mar. 1, 2017). |
Deposition of Jonathan Chaplin, Ph.D., H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. vs. Oxbo International Corporation, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 62 pages (Apr. 10, 2017). |
Declaration of Dr. Daniel J. Undersander, H&S Manufacturing Company, Inc. v. Oxbo International Corporation, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 92 pages (Apr. 13, 2016). |
Patent Owner's Response, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 67 pages (Mar. 1, 2017). |
Reply to Patent Owner's Response, Case No. IPR2016-00950, 35 pages (May 3, 2017). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20160360703 A1 | Dec 2016 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62175038 | Jun 2015 | US |