The present invention relates to internal combustion engines having overhead camshafts, hydraulic lash adjusters (HLAs), and rocker arms end-pivoting on the HLAs and following the cams to activate engine combustion valves; more particularly, to such engines having HLAs both with and without means for selectively engaging and disengaging such valve activation; and most particularly, to means for compensating for mechanical lash in a deactivating hydraulic lash adjuster (DHLA) to permit equal valve lift performance in engines having both HLAs and DHLAs.
It is well known that overall fuel efficiency in a multiple-cylinder internal combustion engine can be increased by selective deactivation of the engine valves, on one or more cylinders, under certain engine load conditions. For cam-in-head engines, a known approach to providing selective deactivation is to equip the HLAs for those valves with means whereby the rocker arms may be rendered incapable of transferring the cyclic motion of engine overhead cams into reciprocal motion of the associated valves. See, for example, U.S. Pat. No. 6,321,704 B1. Typically, a DHLA includes, in addition to the conventional means for hydraulic lash elimination in the valve train, concentric inner and outer portions which are mechanically responsive to the cam lobe and which may be selectively latched and unlatched hydromechanically to each other, typically by the selective engagement of pressurized engine oil to drive spring-loaded latch pins in the inner portion.
In manufacturing generally, it is beneficial to maximize the use of standard components. Thus, in the automotive industry it is standard practice to use identical roller finger followers and camshafts having identical lobe base circle diameters on engines having HLAs and DHLAs. However, DHLAs typically are provided with an amount of intended axial mechanical lash in the components to increase the reliability of the locking mechanism extending from the pin housing to engage the locking feature, such as a groove, in the HLA body. The DHLA's hydraulic lash adjustment mechanism cannot compensate for this built-in mechanical lash. Consequently, since the mechanical lash must be taken up first by the DHLA valve train before the associated valve begins to open, the actual valve lift of a prior art valve train employing locked DHLAs and using a cam lobe designed for a conventional HLA is reduced compared to that of an identical valve train employing HLAs. It is reduced because part of the cam eccentric designed to lift the valve is instead used to compress the length of the DHLA by an amount equal to the mechanical lash. Further, because the pivot center is lowered relative to the HLA counterpart, the timing of the valve opening, maximum lift, and closing are affected as well. Also, the change in effective operating geometry causes changes to the resulting force vectors associated with the DHLA valve trains and leads to further differences in the operating kinematics between the DHLA valve trains and the HLA valve trains. These differences are counter to the objective to reducing variation between the valve trains.
The current remedy of simply adding lash ramps to both the opening slope and the closing slope of the associated cam lobe (along with an increase in maximum lobe height) to accommodate the additional travel of the pin housing within the body due to the mechanical lash, does nothing to keep the pivot centers from shifting. Thus, while differences in valve lift profiles can be eliminated, the variation of force vectors and operating kinematics caused by the shifting pivot centers remain. In addition, with the current remedy, the cam polar coordinates of the HLA cam lobes and the DHLA cam lobes must be made different in order to produce identical valve motion, and, in order to achieve identical valve lift timing, the reference angle locating the maximum lift point on the DHLA cam lobe must be angularly shifted relative to the reference angle locating the maximum lift point on the HLA cam lobe. These adjustments needlessly complicate the camshaft grind specifications and increase the chance of errors when fabricating the camshaft.
What is needed in the art is a simple compensation that can be provided inexpensively in engine manufacture such that the valve lift, valve timing, and effective operating geometry of systems with both HLAs and DHLA components are identical.
It is a principal object of the present invention to provide equal valve lift performance in like engines having HLAs and DHLAs that does not cause the pivot center points of the DHLA rocker arms to shift away from the pivot center points of the HLA rocker arms.
Briefly described, in an engine valve train equipped with a DHLA, in accordance with the present invention the radius of the base circle portion of an associated cam lobe is decreased, relative to the radius of the base circle portion of a cam lobe on the same camshaft associated with an HLA, by an amount proportional to the internal mechanical lash in the DHLA. The surface coordinates of the cam eccentric are unchanged except for the addition of entry and exit ramps which provide the necessary transition to the reduced-diameter base circle portion. The actual decrease in the base-circle radius is calculated by simple trigonometric relationships among the base circle portion, the length of the rocker arm pivot axis, and the internal lash of the DHLA. The decrease in the base circle radius is exactly compensated by extension of the valve train lash-adjustment mechanism of the DHLA with respect to the locked position of the device. The net effect of this improvement is that after the internal DHLA lash is taken up by the rotating cam lobe, the coordinate position of the pivot point of the rocker arm on the associated DHLA is identical to the coordinate position of the pivot point associated with an HLA on the same camshaft at a point when the valve lift event begins to occur. The resulting valve train geometry and operating kinematics is therefore identical for the deactivating and non deactivation valve trains.
The present invention will now be described, by way of example, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:
a and 4b are schematic drawings of a prior art DHLA valve train including the DHLA shown in
a and 5b are schematic drawings of a HLA valve train (5a) and of a DHLA valve train (5b), in accordance with the present invention, showing correct compensation for mechanical lash within the DHLA.
Referring to
Referring specifically to
Referring to
The purpose of describing in detail thus far the arrangement of prior art DHLA 110 is to permit description of the source of mechanical lash within DHLA 110, which is the source of the problem solved by the present invention.
The outward travel of pin housing 114 within bore 115 is limited by engagement of housing stop 158 with stop 148. The axial thickness of housing stop 158 is selected such that the lower edges 160 of pins 136 can readily clear the lower edge of groove 140 during locking of DHLA 110. A desired clearance of typically about 0.250 mm is provided, defining an internal axial mechanical lash within DHLA 110.
Referring to
Referring now to
Referring now to
The shift in the coordinate position of pivot center 55′ to A+X fundamentally changes the relationship between the pivoting follower and the cam lobe and therefore must be accounted for in order to achieve identical valve lift and valve lift timing between the HLA and DHLA valve trains. It is possible to eliminate any lift and/or timing variation by using the actual A+X pivot point in the calculations of the cam lobe contour and by shifting angle β (that is, using an angle β for the DHLA valve trains that differs from angle β for the HLA valve trains). In this case, the valve lifting portion of the lobe contour and angle β of the cam lobes associated with the DHLA valve trains would be unique thereby complicating the grind parameters of the cam shaft lobes.
Thus, while it is possible to exactly match the valve lift of the DHLA valve train with the valve lift of the HLA valve train, there is no way to achieve identical geometry and operating kinematics between the DHLA and HLA valve trains because of the shifting pivot point 55. In other words, the shift in the pivot center from A to A+X causes changes to the resulting force vectors and operating kinematics acting on the DHLA valve train which introduces undesired variation between the DHLA and HLA valve trains.
By comparing
b shows the DHVA valve train in accordance with the invention. Roller 33 is in contact with base circle 35′ and before the roller reaches the beginning of entrance ramp 39′ of cam lobe 45′ (the internal axial mechanical lash has not yet been taken up). The invention provides for the coordinate position of the pivot point of the rocker arm on the associated DHLA relative to the axis of its cam lobe, after lash removal, to be identical to the coordinate position of the pivot point associated with an HLA relative to the axis of its cam lobe. This is done by raising the position of the lash-included pivot point of the DHLA rocker arm to a new pivot point 55″
Since, presently, the particular grind criteria must be calculated and set for each cam lobe of a given cam shaft, a decrease of the base circle radius (along with the addition of suitable entrance and exit ramps) of each lobe dedicated to a DHLA, coupled to the identical polar coordinates for the high lift portion of the cam lobe may be achieved with no or little cost added to the cost of manufacturing the cam shaft. On the other hand, the improvement allows identical valve lift, valve lift timing, and identical operating geometries and operating kinematics to be achieved regardless of whether the valve is in a DHLA position or in a conventional HLA position.
While the invention described herein is shown in a DHLA valve train having the HLA pivot point at one end of the rocker arm, the valve stem contact pad at the other end of the rocker arm and the rocker arm roller between the pivot point and pad, it is understood that components of the rocker arm may be in any order or relationship, including the rocker arm roller on one end, the valve stem contact pad on the other end of the rocker arm and the HLA pivot point between the roller and pad.
While the invention has been described by reference to various specific embodiments, it should be understood that numerous changes may be made within the spirit and scope of the inventive concepts described. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention not be limited to the described embodiments, but will have full scope defined by the language of the following claims.