The present disclosure relates generally to camera-equipped aircraft, for example unmanned aerial vehicles used for surveillance.
Aerial surveillance is an invaluable information-gathering tool. In battle settings, it provides intelligence about troop size, location, and movement, damage assessment, and a host of factors that are critical to successful battle planning and prosecution. Various aircraft-mounted cameras can be used to provide the information in real time, in the form of still or moving (video) images, over a range of spectra including infrared for penetrating through visibility barriers such as haze and for night time operation. The cameras can be fixed or movable, individually or collectively, relative to the aircraft. Gimbaled mechanisms effect camera movement, and generally comprise a turret typically having two degrees of freedom relative to the aircraft. Motion of the turret-mounted camera can be automated, for example in a preset scanning pattern, or user-actuated depending on the specific application. For example, the operator can move or zoom the camera to concentrate attention on a particular area of interest, to capture higher resolution images, or to scan over a broad region in order to detect activity that warrants greater scrutiny, either in real time or during subsequent analysis of the images. Information gathered through surveillance can be processed locally, onboard the aircraft, or transmitted to remote operation centers.
In addition to conventional manned aircraft, unmanned aerial vehicles, or UAVs, have gained widespread acceptance in the war theater. A primary advantage of UAVs is their pilotless nature, which reduces exposure and risk to human life during operation. The absence of a pilot and other human operators, with their attendant support systems, means the UAV can be made smaller, and payload can be dedicated to other components, such as armament and surveillance equipment. However, as reduced size becomes paramount, more exacting constraints are imposed. Among these are weight and range considerations, which translate to requirements of improved aerodynamics and compactness. For these reasons, UAV-mounted cameras need to be smaller and lighter in order to conserve power and range. Further, because of their exterior mounting, their design needs to present less drag or wind resistance to the aircraft.
As described herein, an unmanned aerial vehicle (UAV) includes a fuselage, a gimbal-mounted turret having one or more degrees of freedom relative to the fuselage, a camera disposed in the gimbal-mounted turret for motion therewith in the one or more degrees of freedom, and a central video image processor disposed exteriorly of the gimbal-mounted turret, the central video image processor configured to receive and process image data from the camera.
Also as described herein, a surveillance method includes capturing image information using a gimbaled camera mounted in a turret exterior to an aircraft fuselage, transmitting the captured image information to a central image processor disposed in the aircraft fuselage, and processing the transmitted captured image information in the central image processor.
Also as described herein, a device includes means for capturing image information using a gimbaled camera mounted in a turret exterior to an aircraft fuselage, means for transmitting the captured image information to a central image processor disposed in the aircraft fuselage, and means for processing the transmitted captured image information in the central image processor.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated into and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate one or more examples of embodiments and, together with the description of example embodiments, serve to explain the principles and implementations of the embodiments.
In the drawings:
Example embodiments are described herein in the context of a camera ball turret having high bandwidth data transmission to external image processor. Those of ordinary skill in the art will realize that the following description is illustrative only and is not intended to be in any way limiting. Other embodiments will readily suggest themselves to such skilled persons having the benefit of this disclosure. Reference will now be made in detail to implementations of the example embodiments as illustrated in the accompanying drawings. The same reference indicators will be used to the extent possible throughout the drawings and the following description to refer to the same or like items.
In the interest of clarity, not all of the routine features of the implementations described herein are shown and described. It will, of course, be appreciated that in the development of any such actual implementation, numerous implementation-specific decisions must be made in order to achieve the developer's specific goals, such as compliance with application- and business-related constraints, and that these specific goals will vary from one implementation to another and from one developer to another. Moreover, it will be appreciated that such a development effort might be complex and time-consuming, but would nevertheless be a routine undertaking of engineering for those of ordinary skill in the art having the benefit of this disclosure.
In accordance with this disclosure, the components, process steps, and/or data structures described herein may be implemented using various types of operating systems, computing platforms, computer programs, and/or general purpose machines. In addition, those of ordinary skill in the art will recognize that devices of a less general purpose nature, such as hardwired devices, field programmable gate arrays (FPGAs), application specific integrated circuits (ASICs), or the like, may also be used without departing from the scope and spirit of the inventive concepts disclosed herein. Where a method comprising a series of process steps is implemented by a computer or a machine and those process steps can be stored as a series of instructions readable by the machine, they may be stored on a tangible medium such as a computer memory device (e.g., ROM (Read Only Memory), PROM (Programmable Read Only Memory), EEPROM (Electrically Erasable Programmable Read Only Memory), FLASH Memory, Jump Drive, and the like), magnetic storage medium (e.g., tape, magnetic disk drive, and the like), optical storage medium (e.g., CD-ROM, DVD-ROM, paper card, paper tape and the like) and other types of program memory.
The output of circuit 316 is transmitted out of the turret into the aircraft. The turret payload 302 can contain other hardware and circuit components for operating the camera such as for manipulation and control of frame capture, display orientation, scale, format (bayer, monochrome), image stabilization/tracking, AGC measurement, track or stab offset, and synchronization signals. However, the bulk of the video image processing is performed not by circuitry in the turret payload 302, as in prior art approaches, but by circuits that are disposed in the aircraft itself, as part of the aircraft or fuselage payload 304. This reduces the weight of the turret and its size and commensurate drag, also reducing the amount of heat generated in the turret, wherein limited heat management measures are available, particularly due to the requirement of water-proofing because of weather exposure. In addition, the size and power (and heat) of the motors required to actuate the turret in the various degrees of freedom are reduced, because the weight and the size of the turret is reduced. The reduction in weight reduces the inertia of the turret and as such a lighter turret can be turned as fast by smaller motors or faster with the same motors. In addition, costs are reduced by piggy-backing some or all of the video processing onto existing electronics in the aircraft, eliminating redundant components previously found in both the aircraft and the turret. Further, by centralizing the video image processing onto one location in the aircraft, data from cameras other than those on the turret can be delivered to the centralized location for processing, reducing redundancy, cost and weight, and possibly drag, even more. Because the UAV is battery operated, these reductions directly impact the airtime (e.g. flight mission time) and performance of the aircraft and are critical, outcome determinative factors. The centralized approach is depicted in the block diagram of
Returning to
A surveillance method 500 in accordance with one embodiment is described with reference to
While embodiments and applications have been shown and described, it would be apparent to those skilled in the art having the benefit of this disclosure that many more modifications than mentioned above are possible without departing from the inventive concepts disclosed herein. The invention, therefore, is not to be restricted except in the spirit of the appended claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3638502 | Leavitt et al. | Feb 1972 | A |
4217606 | Nordmann | Aug 1980 | A |
4855823 | Struhs et al. | Aug 1989 | A |
5153623 | Bouvier | Oct 1992 | A |
5251118 | Budnovitch et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5383645 | Pedut et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5897223 | Tritchew et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5936245 | Goillot et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
6056237 | Woodland | May 2000 | A |
6147701 | Tamura et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6226125 | Levy et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
D452697 | Fallowfield et al. | Jan 2002 | S |
6366311 | Monroe | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6529620 | Thompson | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6628338 | Elberbaum et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
7000883 | Mercadal et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7049953 | Monroe | May 2006 | B2 |
7058721 | Ellison et al. | Jun 2006 | B1 |
7131136 | Monroe | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7173526 | Monroe | Feb 2007 | B1 |
7253398 | Hughes et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7280810 | Feher | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7359622 | Monroe et al. | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7400348 | Hoyos | Jul 2008 | B2 |
7526183 | Takahashi et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7561037 | Monroe | Jul 2009 | B1 |
7634662 | Monroe | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7695647 | Smela et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7747364 | Roy et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7955006 | Harvey | Jun 2011 | B1 |
8091833 | von Flotow et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8137007 | Harvey | Mar 2012 | B1 |
8140200 | Heppe et al. | Mar 2012 | B2 |
8174612 | Koehler | May 2012 | B1 |
D662120 | Deuwaarder | Jun 2012 | S |
8226039 | von Flotow et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
D668701 | Ohno et al. | Oct 2012 | S |
8523462 | Dimotakis | Sep 2013 | B2 |
8559801 | Dimotakis | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8589994 | Monroe | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8767041 | Yun et al. | Jul 2014 | B2 |
8891539 | Ozawa | Nov 2014 | B2 |
20010043751 | Takahashi et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020145678 | Suzuki | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030067542 | Monroe | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030099457 | Takahashi et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20040026573 | Andersson et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040068583 | Monroe et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040173726 | Mercadal et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040230352 | Monroe | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20050219639 | Fujise et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060033288 | Hughes et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
20060110155 | Kouchi et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060231675 | Bostan | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20070031151 | Cunningham | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20080204553 | Thompson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080205696 | Thompson | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080215204 | Roy et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080267612 | Harvey | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080277631 | Smela et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080316313 | Monroe et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090015674 | Alley et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090216394 | Heppe et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090218447 | von Flotow et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090273671 | Gardner | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090284644 | McKaughan et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20100013628 | Monroe | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100110162 | Yun et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100141503 | Baumatz | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100241931 | Choi et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100265329 | Doneker | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100309344 | Zimmer et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110103021 | Janssen et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110170556 | Ozawa | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120104169 | von Flotow et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120106800 | Khan et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120200703 | Nadir | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120320203 | Liu | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20130048792 | Szarek et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050486 | Omer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130050487 | Omer et al. | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051778 | Dimotakis | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130051782 | Dimotakis | Feb 2013 | A1 |
20130135471 | Giuffrida et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20140161435 | Dimotakis | Jun 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
201099352 | Aug 2008 | CN |
101766049 | Jun 2010 | CN |
211058 | Aug 1993 | TW |
I311121 | Jun 2009 | TW |
WO 2013074172 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013074173 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013074175 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013074176 | May 2013 | WO |
WO 2013074177 | May 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,617 dated Dec. 4, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,562 dated Nov. 23, 2012. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US12/52727, dated Mar. 18, 2013. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US12/52728. , dated Mar. 19, 2013. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US12/52723, dated May 3, 2013. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US12/52725, dated May 3, 2013. |
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion in International Application No. PCT/US12/52729, dated May 13, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,562, dated May 1, 2013. |
Notice of Allowance in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,617, dated Jun. 10, 2013. |
Office Action and Search Report in TW Application No. 101130827 dated Feb. 12, 2015, 14 pages. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/967,720, dated Mar. 25, 2015. |
Notice of Allowance for U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,619, dated Mar. 6, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,197, dated Nov. 7, 2013. |
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,197, dated Jun. 2, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,619, dated May 13, 2014. |
Final Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,619, dated Oct. 8, 2014. |
Office Action and Search Report in Taiwanese Application No. 101130829, dated May 14, 2014. |
Office Action in Taiwanese Application No. 101130829, dated Sep. 29, 2014. |
Office Action and Search Report in Taiwanese Application No. 101130830 dated Oct. 30, 2014. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/967,720, dated Oct. 8, 2014. |
Office Action and Search Report in Taiwanese Application No. 101130828, dated Nov. 11, 2014. |
Taiwanese Office Action and Search Report for TW 101130832, dated Jun. 26, 2015. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,535, dated Aug. 2, 2013, 10 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,619, dated Dec. 9, 2013 (restriction), 8 pages. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 13/220,619, dated Oct. 8, 2014, 11 pages. |
Office Action and Search Report in Taiwanese Application No. 101130828, dated Nov. 11, 2014, 24 pages. |
Office Action, dated Aug. 21, 2015, in Taiwanese Application No. 101130827. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 10, 2016, issued in U.S. Appl. No. 15/010,445, 31 pages. |
Office Action, dated Jun. 21, 2016, issued in Taiwanese Patent Application No. 105113973, 8 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130050487 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |