The present invention relates to a can body.
Attempts have been made to reduce the thickness of cans in order to save natural resources and reduce cost, and various can shapes have been suggested to compensate for the decrease in can strength which accompanies such thickness reduction. In particular, the shape of a can bottom is generally known in which a dome part having a center that is recessed in a dome—like shape to the inner side is provided and a leg part projecting annularly downward of a can axis is provided around the dome part in order to increase the internal pressure resistance.
Further, in a can body to be filled with contents, such as carbonated beverages, that increase the internal pressure, molding which is called bottom reforming is generally performed by recessing an inner side connection portion of the leg part and the dome part toward the outer side of the leg part in order to further increase the internal pressure resistance (for example, see Patent Documents 1 and 2 shown below).
In a can body designed for contents such as carbonated beverages, after the contents are filled and the can lid is seamed, the internal pressure inside the can body rises and the can lid may be curved upward. Where such curving occurs, the tip of the opening tab provided at the can lid rises from the surface (shell surface) of the curved can lid. In such a case, when the can bodies filled with the contents are stacked and the can body placed at the upper stage loses the balance, there arises a problem in that the leg part at the can bottom in the can body at the upper stage enters a gap between the tab tip and the can lid surface of the can body at the stage therebelow, and the tab is raised due to the leverage action and an unexpected opening occurs. In a can body having the can bottom subjected to the aforementioned bottom reforming, the leg part easily enters the gap between the tab tip and the can lid surface due to the recess created by the bottom reforming. Therefore, the aforementioned unexpected opening is likely to occur.
To avoid such an unexpected opening, it has been suggested to provide the shell with a protrusion protruding near the tip of the tab so as to prevent the leg part of the can bottom from entering under the tab, this approach being focused only on the form of the can lid (see PTL 3). However, the problem associated with this approach is not only that the processing of the can lid is costly, but also that the operability of the tab is degraded. Further, where attention is paid only to the form of the can bottom, the recess created by bottom reforming needs to be made shallow in order to avoid the aforementioned unexpected opening, and a high inner pressure resistance required when the carbonated beverage or the like is used as the contents cannot be obtained. In view of such circumstances, the form of a can body capable of suppressing the unexpected opening while ensuring a high internal pressure resistance needs to be found by comprehensively considering the form of the can lid and the form of the can bottom.
The present invention aims to address such a problem. Thus, it is an object of the present invention to provide a can body containing contents such as carbonated beverages, the can body being capable of suppressing the occurrence of an unexpected opening while increasing the internal pressure resistance.
In order to attain the abovementioned object, a can body according to the present invention has the following configuration.
A can body including: a can lid provided with a tab for opening; and a can bottom provided with a dome part having a center recessed to an inner side, and a leg part projecting annularly toward a lower side around the dome part, wherein a recessed part facing an outer side of the leg part is provided at a connection portion of the dome part and the leg part, and formula
(A+B)·E/Z<1.88 is satisfied when 0<L<Y2, with the following definitions:
L=D·cos (θ1 −θ2), A=X·(L+Y1−Y2)/Y1, and B=L+Y1−Y2, under a condition of E<Z,
in the formulas, D: a distance from a tip of the tab to a surface of the can lid,
E: a distance from a crossing part of a vertical line drawn from the tip of the tab and the surface of the can lid to an apex part of a seaming panel of the can lid,
θ1: an angle between a straight line connecting the crossing part and the apex part of the seaming panel and a vertical line,
Z: a distance from a grounding part of the leg part to a lower end of a can barrel connected to the outer side of the leg part,
θ2: an angle between a straight line connecting the grounding part and the lower end of the can barrel and a vertical line,
Y1: a distance from a bottom part of the recessed part to a lower end of the recessed part,
Y2: a distance from the bottom part to the grounding part, and
X: a distance between a vertical line passing through the lower end of the recessed part and the bottom part.
A can body including: a can lid provided with a tab for opening; and a can bottom provided with a dome part having a center recessed to an inner side, and a leg part projecting annularly toward a lower side around the dome part, wherein a recessed part facing an outer side of the leg part is provided at a connection portion of the dome part and the leg part, and formula
(A+B)·E/Z<1.85 is satisfied when L≧Y2, with the following definitions:
L=D·cos (θ1−θ2), A=X·(Y1+Y2−L)/Y1, and B=L+Y1−Y2, under a condition of E<Z,
in the formulas, D: a distance from a tip of the tab to a surface of the can lid,
E: a distance from a crossing part of a vertical line drawn from the tip of the tab and the surface of the can lid to an apex part of a seaming panel of the can lid,
θ1: an angle between a straight line connecting the crossing part and the apex part of the seaming panel and a vertical line,
Z: a distance from a grounding part of the leg part to a lower end of a can barrel connected to the outer side of the leg part,
θ2: an angle between a straight line connecting the grounding part and the lower end of the can barrel and a vertical line,
Y1: a distance from a bottom part of the recessed part to a lower end of the recessed part,
Y2: a distance from the bottom part to the grounding part, and
X: a distance between a vertical line passing through the lower end of the recessed part and the bottom part.
With the can body of the present invention having such features, as a result of satisfying the abovementioned conditions relating to the dimensions of the can lid and the can bottom, it is possible to suppress effectively an unexpected opening occurring at the lower stage of stacked can bodies even in the bottom-reformed can having increased internal pressure resistance.
Embodiments of the present invention will be described below with reference to the drawings.
The can lid 2 has a well-known structure in which a tab 21 for opening is attached to the central shell 20, and a seaming panel 22 is formed by being double-seamed to a flange part of the can barrel 4 around the shell 20. The can bottom 3 is provided with a dome part 30 having a center recessed to the inner side, and a leg part 31 projecting annularly toward the lower side around the dome part 30. A bottom reformed part in which a recessed part 32 is formed to face the outer side of the leg part 31 is formed at the connection portion of the dome part 30 and the leg part 31 in the can bottom 3. Further, in the example shown in
The can body 1 may have a curved or linear contour shape as long as the following parts can be specified. As shown in
The dimensions specified by appropriately selecting the above-mentioned parts (a) to (g) are determined as follows.
D: a distance from the tip (f) of the tab 21 to the surface (crossing part (e)) of the can lid 2 (D=D1+(1/2)T, D1 is a gap between the tab 21 and the surface of the can lid 2, T is the thickness of the tab).
E: a distance from the crossing part (e) of the vertical line drawn from the tip (f) of the tab 21 and the surface of the can lid 2 to the apex part (g) of the seaming panel 22 of the can lid 2.
θ1: an angle between a straight line connecting the crossing part (e) and the apex part (g) of the seaming panel 22 and a vertical line.
Z: a distance from a grounding part (a) of the leg part 31 to a lower end (b) of the can barrel 4 connected to the outer side of the leg part 31.
θ2: an angle between a straight line connecting the grounding part (a) and the lower end (b) of the can barrel 4 and a vertical line.
Y1: a distance from the bottom part (d) of the recessed part 32 to the lower end (c) of the recessed part 32.
Y2: a distance from the bottom part (d) to the grounding part (a).
X: a distance between a vertical line passing through the lower end (c) of the recessed part 32 and the bottom part (d).
Here, in the embodiment of the present invention, it is a precondition that the relationship between the distance E from the crossing part (e) of the vertical line drawn from the tip (f) of the tab 21 and the surface of the can lid 2 to the apex part (g) of the seaming panel 22 of the can lid 2, and the distance Z from the grounding part (a) of the leg part 31 to the lower end (b) of the can barrel 4 connected to the outer side of the leg part 31 be E<Z. The relationship E<Z specified herein means that when the can bodies 1 are stacked on the upper stage and the lower stage and the upper stage can body 1 loses the balance, the can barrel 4 of the can body 1 contacts the apex part (g) of the seaming panel 22, and in this state, the grounding part (a) of the leg part 31 does not enter the gap D1 between the tab 21 and the surface of the can lid 2. Where the dimensional relationship of E≧Z is valid, when the upper can body 1 loses the balance, in a state in which the can barrel 4 of the can body 1 is in contact with the apex part (g) of the seaming panel 22, the grounding part (a) of the leg part 31 may enter into the gap D1 between the tab 21 and the surface of the can lid 2, but the configuration with such a dimensional relationship is excluded from the embodiment of the present invention.
In the can body 1 according to the embodiment of the present invention, the value L determined by the following equation is defined by the aforementioned dimensions.
L=D·cos (θ1 −θ2)
This value L is for evaluating virtually where the tip (f) of the tab 21 in the can body 1 of the lower stage contacts the inner side of the leg part 31 of the can body 1 of the upper stage when the stacked can body 1 of the upper stage loses the balance.
This value L is used to distinguish between the case in which 0<L<Y2 and the case in which L≧Y2 and to define an evaluation index a for evaluating whether an unexpected opening can easily occur by the dimensional relationship between the can lid 2 and the can bottom 3 in the following formula.
α=(A+B)·E/Z
However, when 0<L<Y2,
A=X·(L+Y1−Y2)/Y1, B=L+Y1−Y2, and
when L Y2,
A=X·(Y1+Y2−L)/Y1, B=L+Y1−Y2.
The evaluation index a is a value that is uniquely determined only by the dimensions (E, D, θ1) of each part of the can lid 2 and the dimensions (Z, θ2, X, Y1, Y2) of each part of the can bottom 3 described hereinabove. This index makes it possible to evaluate comprehensively the relationship between the shape of the can lid 2 and the shape of the can bottom 3 and to evaluate whether an unexpected opening is likely to occur. Basically, since the value of the evaluation index a becomes larger as the value L, which is proportional to the distance D from the tip (f) of the tab 21 to the surface (crossing part (e)) of the can lid 2, increases, it can be said that an unexpected opening is more likely to occur when the evaluation index a is large. By specifying the upper limit of the evaluation index a to an appropriate value, it is possible to design the dimensions of the can body 1 (the dimensions of the can lid and the can bottom) in which an unexpected opening hardly occurs.
The evaluation index a is hereinbelow determined by actually measuring the above-mentioned dimensions with respect to the can bodies 1 for which the shape of the can lid 2 and the shape of the can bottom 3 were variously set and which were filled with contents, and the appropriate upper limit value of the evaluation index a is determined by using the test results as to whether or not an unexpected opening occurs.
As the shape of the can lid 2, the dimensions of two samples (“sample A” and “sample B”) were actually measured.
The dimensions D, E, θ1, and L actually measured from each sample are shown in Table 1.
As the shape of the can bottom 3, the dimensions Z and θ2 of the outer side shape of the leg part 31 were made constant as shown in Table 2, and with respect to the inner side shape (bottom reformed shape) of the leg part 31, the dimensions (X, Y1, Y2) of the recessed part 32 were actually measured for the can bodies 1 obtained by setting molding rolls with different molding heights of 1.95, 2.41, 2.85, and 3.3 mm and performing molding at a reforming diameter d0 of 46.6, 46.8, 47.0, 47.2, 47.4, and 47.6 mm. The measurement results are shown in Table 3. Here, the reforming diameter d0 is a diameter corresponding to the bottom part (d) of the recessed part 32, and the molding height indicates the contact position height of the molding roll for molding the recessed part 32.
The evaluation index a was calculated for each sample (sample A, sample B) of the can lid 2 and each molding height and reforming diameter separately for the case in which L Y2 and the case in which 0<L<Y2. The calculation results are shown in Table 4 (calculation results for sample A) and Table 5 (calculation results for sample B).
1.86
1.89
1.88
2.01
1.95
1.95
2.10
1.94
1.88
2.01
2.23
2.14
1.87
1.93
A state is realized in which the can bodies 1 to be evaluated are stacked in two stages and the can body 1 of the upper stage has lost the balance (a state in which the leg part 31 of the can body 1 of the upper stage hangs under the tab 21 of the can body 1 of the lower stage), the can body 1 of the lower stage is gradually inclined, and the inclination angle of the can body 1 of the lower stage at the time the can body 1 of the upper stage falls is measured. Here, a large value of the measured inclination angle of the can body 1 of the lower stage means that the leg part 31 is deeply hooked on the gap under the tab 21, and therefore it can be said that the occurrence of an unexpected opening is highly probable. More specifically, a case in which the upper can body does not fall even when the inclination angle of the can body 1 of the lower stage is 30° or more, is evaluated as a possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening (failure), and such a case is indicated by underlining in the table.
<Relationship between Calculated Value of Evaluation Index a and Test Results>
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 4, when the molding height was 1.95 mm, the relationship L≧Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0=46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.53 to 1.88, but the value evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening was only 1.88.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 4, when the molding height was 2.41 mm, the relationship L≧Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0=46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.64 to 2.01, but the values evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening were 1.86 to 2.01.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 4, when the molding height was 2.85 mm, the relationship 0<L<Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0=46.6 mm to 47.4 mm, and the relationship L≧Y2 (L=2.60, Y2=2.58) was valid at the reforming diameter d0 =47.6 mm, and the evaluation index a was 1.66 to 2.23, but the values evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening were 1.89 to 2.23.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 4, when the molding height of 3.3 mm, the relationship 0<L<Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0=46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.59 to 2.14, but the values evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening were 1.95 to 2.14.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 5, when the molding height was 1.95 mm, the relationship L≧Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0 =46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.34 to 1.73, but there were no values evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 5, when the molding height was 2.41 mm, the relationship L≧Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0 =46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.45 to 1.87, but the value evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening was only 1.87.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 5, when the molding height was 2.85 mm, the relationship 0<L<Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0 =46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.41 to 1.93, but the value evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening was only 1.93.
Among the values of the evaluation index a shown in Table 5, when the molding height was 3.3 mm, the relationship 0<L<Y2 was valid over the entire range of the reforming diameter d0 =46.6 mm to 47.6 mm and the evaluation index a was 1.34 to 1.84, but there were no values evaluated as indicating the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening.
The relationship between the evaluation index a and the test results described above indicates that by setting the upper limit value of the evaluation index α, it is possible to set comprehensively the can lid dimensions and the can bottom dimensions at which the occurrence of an unexpected opening can be avoided. Further, it can be seen from the test results that when L≧Y2, the occurrence of an unexpected opening can be avoided at α<1.85 (or α<1.86), and when L>Y2, the occurrence of an unexpected opening can be avoided at α<1.88 (α<1.89).
Thus, according to the present invention, the possibility of occurrence of an unexpected opening can be accurately evaluated by using the evaluation index a which comprehensively takes into account the dimensions of the can lid 2 and the dimensions of the can bottom 3 of the can body 1. Therefore, it is possible to design freely the shape of the can body 1 or the barrel diameter (capacity) within an appropriate range of the evaluation index a, and it is possible to obtain can bodies with a variety of shape variations which have a high internal pressure resistance and no occurrence of an unexpected opening.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2015-073707 | Mar 2015 | JP | national |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | PCT/JP2016/054285 | Feb 2016 | US |
Child | 15710032 | US |