Can combustor for a gas turbine engine

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 6772583
  • Patent Number
    6,772,583
  • Date Filed
    Wednesday, September 11, 2002
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 10, 2004
    19 years ago
Abstract
A gas turbine engine (10) includes a plurality of can combustors (19). Each can combustor includes a first stage of burners (46) located at a first radius about the combustor centerline (42) and a second stage of burners (50) located at a second radius greater than the first radius. The second stage of burners may be clocked to an angular position that is not midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage. Combustion instabilities may be controlled by exploiting variations in combustion parameters created by differential fueling of the two stages.
Description




FIELD OF THE INVENTION




This invention relates to the field of gas turbine engines and, in particular, to gas turbine engines having a can annular combustor.




BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION




Gas turbine engines are known to include a compressor for compressing air; a combustor for producing a hot gas by burning fuel in the presence of the compressed air produced by the compressor, and a turbine for expanding the hot gas to extract shaft power. The combustion process in many older gas turbine engines is dominated by diffusion flames burning at or near stoichiometric conditions with flame temperatures exceeding 3,000° F. Such combustion will produce a high level of oxides of nitrogen (NOx). Current emissions regulations have greatly reduced the allowable levels of NOx emissions. Lean premixed combustion has been developed to reduce the peak flame temperatures and to correspondingly reduce the production of NOx in gas turbine engines. In a premixed combustion process, fuel and air are premixed in a premixing section of the combustor. The fuel-air mixture is then introduced into a combustion chamber where it is burned. U.S. Pat. No. 6,082,111 describes a gas turbine engine utilizing a can annular premix combustor design. Multiple premixers are positioned in a ring to provide a premixed fuel/air mixture to a combustion chamber. A pilot fuel nozzle is located at the center of the ring to provide a flow of pilot fuel to the combustion chamber.




The design of a gas turbine combustor is complicated by the necessity for the gas turbine engine to operate reliably with a low level of emissions at a variety of power levels. High power operation at high firing temperatures tends to increase the generation of oxides of nitrogen. Low power operation at lower combustion temperatures tends to increase the generation of carbon monoxide and unburned hydrocarbons due to incomplete combustion of the fuel. Under all operating conditions, it is important to ensure the stability of the flame to avoid unexpected flameout, damaging levels of acoustic vibration, and damaging flashback of the flame from the combustion chamber into the fuel premix section of the combustor. A relatively rich fuel/air mixture will improve the stability of the combustion process but will have an adverse affect on the level of emissions. A careful balance must be achieved among these various constraints in order to provide a reliable machine capable of satisfying very strict modern emissions regulations.




Dynamics concerns vary among the different types of combustor designs. Gas turbines having an annular combustion chamber include a plurality of burners disposed in one or more concentric rings for providing fuel into a single toroidal annulus. U.S. Pat. No. 5,400,587 describes one such annular combustion chamber design. Annular combustion chamber dynamics are generally dominated by circumferential pressure pulsation modes between the plurality of burners. In contrast, gas turbines having can annular combustion chambers include a plurality of individual can combustors wherein the combustion process in each can is relatively isolated from interaction with the combustion process of adjacent cans. Can annular combustion chamber dynamics are generally dominated by axial pressure pulsation modes within the individual cans.




Staging is the delivery of fuel to the combustion chamber through at least two separately controllable fuel supply systems or stages including separate fuel nozzles or sets of fuel nozzles. As the power level of the machine is increased, the amount of fuel supplied through each stage is increased to achieve a desired power level. A two-stage can annular combustor is described in U.S. Pat. No. 4,265,085. The combustor of the '085 patent includes a primary stage delivering fuel to a central region of the combustion chamber and a secondary stage delivering fuel to an annular region of the combustion chamber surrounding the central region. The primary stage is a fuel-rich core wherein stoichiometry can be optimized. U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,781 describes an axially staged hybrid can-annular combustor wherein the premixers for two stages are positioned at different axial locations along the axial flow path of the combustion air. U.S. Pat. No. 5,307,621 describes a method of controlling combustion using an asymmetric whirl combustion pattern.




SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION




With the continuing demand for gas turbine engines having lower levels of emissions and increased operational flexibility, further improvements in gas turbine combustor design and operation are needed. Accordingly, a can combustor for a gas turbine engine is described herein as including: a first stage comprising a first plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around a longitudinal centerline of a combustion chamber at a first radial distance from the centerline; and a second stage comprising a second plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around the centerline of the combustion chamber at a second radial distance different than the first radial distance. The burners of the second stage may be angularly positioned midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage or at respective angular locations other than midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage.




A can combustor for a gas turbine engine is further describe as including: a first stage comprising a first plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around a longitudinal centerline of a combustion chamber and angularly separated from each other by an angle of 360/N degrees; a second stage comprising a second plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around the longitudinal centerline of the combustion chamber and angularly separated from each other by an angle of 360/N degrees; wherein the burners of the second stage are positioned at respective angular locations other than midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage. The first plurality of burners may be spaced from the longitudinal centerline at a first radial distance; and the second plurality of burners may be spaced from the longitudinal centerline at a second radial distance different than the first radial distance.




A gas turbine engine is described as including: a compressor for supplying compressed air; a can annular combustor for burning fuel in the compressed air to produce a hot gas; and a turbine for expanding the hot gas; wherein the can annular combustor further comprises a plurality of can combustors each comprising: an annular member defining a combustion chamber having a longitudinal centerline; a first plurality of burners disposed in a symmetrical ring around the centerline at a first radial distance; and a second plurality of burners disposed in a symmetrical ring around the centerline at a second radial distance greater than the first radial distance. The angular position of the second plurality of burners may be selected so that the burners of the second plurality of burners are angularly centered between respective neighboring burners of the first plurality of burners or so that the burners of the second plurality of burners are not angularly centered between respective neighboring burners of the first plurality of burners.




A gas turbine engine is describe herein as including: a compressor for supplying compressed air; a can annular combustor for burning fuel in the compressed air to produce a hot gas; and a turbine for expanding the hot gas; wherein the can annular combustor further comprises a plurality of can combustors each comprising: a first stage of burners disposed in a symmetrical circular pattern about a centerline, N being the number of burners in the first stage of burners and 360/N° being an angle of separation between burners of the first stage of burners; a second stage of burners disposed in a symmetrical circular pattern about the centerline, the burners of the second stage of burners being singularly disposed between respective neighboring burners of the first stage of burners, N being the number of burners in the second stage of burners and 360/N° being an angle of separation between burners of the second stage of burners; and an angular separation between burners of the first stage of burners and neighboring burners of the second stage of burners being an angle not equal to 360/2N°. The first stage of burners may be disposed in a circular pattern having a first radius about the centerline; and the second stage of burners may be disposed in a circular pattern having a second radius about the centerline not equal to the first radius.











BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS




These and other advantages of the invention will be more apparent from the following description in view of the drawings that show:





FIG. 1

is a functional diagram of a gas turbine engine having an improved can annular combustor design.





FIG. 2

is a sectional view of the can annular combustor of the gas turbine engine of FIG.


1


.





FIG. 3A

is a calculated temperature field for a burner of the can annular combustor of

FIG. 2

with a first radial location.





FIG. 3B

is a calculated temperature field for a burner of the can annular combustor of

FIG. 2

with a second radial location.





FIG. 3C

is a calculated temperature field for a neighboring pair of burners of the can annular combustor of FIG.


2


.





FIG. 4

is a sectional view of a further embodiment of a gas turbine engine having an improved annular combustor design.











DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION





FIG. 1

illustrates a gas turbine engine


10


having a compressor


12


for receiving a flow of filtered ambient air


14


and for producing a flow of compressed air


16


. The compressed air


16


is received by a combustor


18


of the can annular type where it is used to burn a flow of a combustible fuel


20


, such as natural gas or fuel oil for example, to produce a flow of hot combustion gas


22


. The fuel


20


is supplied by a fuel supply apparatus


24


capable of providing two independently controllable stages of fuel flow from a first stage fuel supply


26


and a second stage fuel supply


28


. The hot combustion gas


22


is received by a turbine


30


where it is expanded to extract mechanical shaft power. In one embodiment, a common shaft


32


interconnects the turbine


30


with the compressor


12


as well as an electrical generator


34


to provide mechanical power for compressing the ambient air


14


and for producing electrical power, respectively. The expanded combustion gas


36


may be exhausted directly to the atmosphere or it may be routed through additional heat recovery systems (not shown).




The gas turbine engine


10


provides improved operating flexibility as a result of features of the combustor


18


that are shown more clearly in FIG.


2


.

FIG. 2

is a partial sectional view of just one of the can combustors


19


contained within the can annular combustor


18


.

FIG. 2

illustrates a section taken perpendicular to the direction of flow of the hot combustion gas


22


through the can combustor


19


. Combustor can


19


includes an annular member


38


extending from a base plate


39


and defining a combustion chamber


40


having a longitudinal centerline


42


. A pilot burner


44


may be located at the centerline location, although such a pilot burner may not be used for all applications. Combustor


18


also includes a first plurality of burners


46


disposed in a symmetrical ring at a first radial distance R


1


around the centerline


42


. The distance R


1


is measured from the longitudinal centerline


42


of the combustion chamber


40


to the centerline


48


of the respective burner


46


. The centers of all of the first plurality of burners


46


are located on a circle having a radius of R


1


about the centerline


42


. Can combustor


19


also includes a second plurality of burners


50


disposed in a symmetrical ring around the centerline


42


at a second radial distance R


2


. R


2


may be equal to or greater than the first radial distance R


1


as will be described more fully below. Burners


46


,


50


may be any design known in the art and are preferably premix burners. The first plurality of burners


46


is connected to the first stage fuel supply


26


and the second plurality of burners


50


is connected to the second stage fuel supply


28


to form a two-stage burner. It is also possible to divide the six burners into three or more fuel stages to provide additional degrees of control flexibility, although it is recognized that additional fuel stages may be expensive and would generally not be used unless necessary. Furthermore, the number of fuel stages should be no more than the number of burners divided by 2 or the combustion will become asymmetric. If provided, the pilot burner


44


may be connected to a separate pilot fuel supply (not shown). The pilot burner


44


may be a premix or diffusion burner.




The number N of burners in the first plurality of burners


46


as well as in the second plurality of burners


50


is illustrated as being three, although other arrangements are possible. N=2, 3 or 4 are probably the only practical applications in a can annular application. Because the arrangement of the burners about the centerline is symmetric, the separation between burners of the first plurality of burners


46


as well as the separation between burners of the second plurality of burners


50


is 360/N°, or in the illustrated embodiment 360/3° or 120 degrees. If the clocking between the first plurality of burners


46


and the second plurality of burners


50


is selected so that neighboring burners are equidistant from each other, the angular separation between neighboring burners


46


,


50


is 360/2N° or 60 degrees. Alternatively, the relative clocking between the two stages of burners


46


,


50


may be selected so that an angular separation between burners of the first plurality of burners


46


and neighboring burners of the second plurality of burners


50


is an angle not equal to 360/2N°.




It is desired to provide a symmetrical arrangement of burners within the can combustor


19


, and prior art can combustors exhibit such symmetry. However, a symmetrical arrangement of burners will produce a homogeneous flame front that may be vulnerable to combustion instability at a resonant frequency. The present invention provides an increased degree of control over the combustion process to address the possibility of such instability without the addition of special burners and without the need for an additional fuel stage.

FIG. 2

illustrates that can combustor


19


has its first stage burners


46


disposed at a different radius R


1


than the radius R


2


of the second stage burners


50


. As a result of this difference, the two stages having essentially identical fuel supplies and burner designs will produce somewhat different combustion conditions within the combustion chamber


40


.

FIGS. 3A-3C

illustrate these differences and how these differences may be used to control the combustion process to avoid instabilities.





FIG. 3A

illustrates a calculated temperature of the hot combustion gas


22


across a plane located just downstream from burner


46


located at a distance R


1


away from centerline


42


. The darkness of the shading in this figure correlates to the temperature. The results of a similar calculation for a burner


50


under the same firing conditions but located at a distance R


2


away from centerline


42


are illustrated in FIG.


3


B. In this example, R


2


is greater than R


1


. The same shading represents the same temperature in each of these Figures. A comparison of

FIG. 3A

to

FIG. 3B

reveals that the distance of the burner from the centerline


42


affects the temperature distribution within the combustion chamber


40


.

FIG. 3C

illustrates the temperature distribution that will result when firing both of two neighboring burners


46


,


50


located at respective dissimilar radii of R


1


and R


2


. One may appreciate that this temperature distribution will change as the relative fuel flow rates are changed between the burners


46


,


50


. The combustion in combustion chamber


40


will remain symmetrical about the centerline


42


regardless of whether only the first stage


46


is fueled, or if only the second stage


50


is fueled, or if both the first and second stages


46


,


50


are fueled. However, the temperature distributions of

FIGS. 3A

,


3


B and


3


C reveal that there is a difference in the combustion process among these three fueling configurations, and that difference can be exploited as a degree of control over the combustion process to optimize one or more combustion parameters under various operating conditions. This differs from prior art can combustors wherein the burners of all stages are located at the same radial distance and wherein all stages respond identically to changes in the rate of fuel delivery.




A further degree of control may be developed in the can combustor


19


of

FIG. 2

by providing an uneven clocking between the first and second stages


46


,


50


. As described above, in one embodiment the angular distance between neighboring nozzles may be a constant value of 360/2N degrees. For that example, angles A and B of

FIG. 2

would be equal. However, by locating the second plurality of burners


50


at an angular location other than midway between respective burners


46


, an angular displacement other than 360/2N degrees may be selected. For that example, angles A and B of the combustor


60


of

FIG. 4

are unequal. The angle between adjacent burners may be 360/2N° plus or minus no more than 5 degrees or 360/2N° plus or minus no more than 10 degrees in two alternative embodiments. The combustion is still symmetric as long as all burners of a particular stage move by the same amount. Such uneven angular clocking will provide a degree of control that is responsive to the relative fuel flow rates provided to the two stages


46


,


50


. This effect can be used separately or it can be combined with the above-described effect of providing second stage burners


50


at a different radius than the first stage burners


46


.




The can combustor


19


will behave differently when there is a change in the fuel bias between stages; i.e. providing X % fuel through first stage


46


and Y % fuel through second stage


50


will result in combustion conditions that are different than providing Y % fuel through first stage


46


and X % fuel through second stage


50


. In prior art can combustors having two main fuel stages, each stage behaves the same as the other stage. By providing first and second stage burners


46


,


50


having different radii R


1


, R


2


and/or having asymmetric clocking there between, the two stages of the present invention will act differently to provide additional control possibilities for suppressing combustion dynamics. This improvement in control flexibility is provided without the necessity for providing an additional fuel stage.




The novel configurations described herein do not change the bulk firing temperature for any particular fuelling level when compared to a prior art can annular combustor. Rather, the aim is to create as many different modes of behavior as possible from a given number of fuel stages. For combustors that hold flame on the base plate


39


, it is also possible to alter the flame holding zones on the base plate by fuel stage biasing in the can combustor


19


of FIG.


2


.




While the preferred embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions will occur to those of skill in the art without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.



Claims
  • 1. A can combustor for a gas turbine engine comprising:a first stage comprising a first plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around a longitudinal centerline of a combustion chamber at a first radial distance from the centerline; and a second stage comprising a second plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around the centerline of the combustion chamber at a second radial distance different than the first radial distance.
  • 2. The can combustor of claim 1, wherein the burners of the second stage are angularly positioned midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage.
  • 3. The can combustor of claim 1, wherein the burners of the second stage are positioned at respective angular locations other than midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage.
  • 4. The can combustor of claim 3, wherein there are N burners in each of the first stage and the second stage, and further comprising an angular position between adjacent burners of 360/2N° plus or minus no more than 5 degrees.
  • 5. The can combustor of claim 3, wherein there are N burners in each of the first stage and the second stage, and further comprising an angular position between adjacent burners of 360/2N° plus or minus no more than 10 degrees.
  • 6. The can combustor of claim 1, further comprising the burners of the first plurality of burners each being disposed along a respective radius line, and the burners of the second plurality of burners each being disposed along a respective radius line that is not a radius line along which one of the first plurality of burners is disposed.
  • 7. A can combustor for a gas turbine engine comprising:a first stage comprising a first plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around a longitudinal centerline of a combustion chamber and angularly separated from each other by an angle of 360/N degrees; a second stage comprising a second plurality of burners arranged symmetrically around the longitudinal centerline of the combustion chamber and angularly separated from each other by an angle of 360/N degrees; wherein the burners of the second stage are positioned at respective angular locations other than midway between respective neighboring burners of the first stage.
  • 8. The can combustor of claim 7, wherein there are N burners in each of the first stage and the second stage, and further comprising an angular position between adjacent burners of 360/2N° plus or minus no more than 5 degrees.
  • 9. The can combustor of claim 7, wherein there are N burners in each of the first stage and the second stage, and further comprising an annular position between adjacent burners of 360/2N° plus or minus no more than 10 degrees.
  • 10. The can combustor of claim 7, further comprising:the first plurality of burners spaced from the longitudinal centerline at a first radial distance; and the second plurality of burners spaced from the longitudinal centerline at a second radial distance different than the first radial distance.
  • 11. A gas turbine engine comprising:a compressor for supplying compressed air; a can annular combustor for burning fuel in the compressed air to produce a hot gas; and a turbine for expanding the hot gas; wherein the can annular combustor further comprises a plurality of can combustors each comprising: an annular member defining a combustion chamber having a longitudinal centerline; a first plurality of burners fueled by a first fuel supply and disposed in a symmetrical ring around the centerline at a first radial distance; and a second plurality of burners fueled by a second fuel supply separately controllable from the first fuel supply, the second plurality of burners being disposed in a symmetrical ring around the centerline at a second radial distance greater than the first radial distance.
  • 12. The gas turbine engine of claim 11, wherein the angular position of the second plurality of burners is selected so that the burners of the second plurality of burners are angularly centered between respective neighboring burners of the first plurality of burners.
  • 13. The gas turbine engine of claim 11, wherein the angular position of the second plurality of burners is selected so that the burners of the second plurality of burners are not angularly centered between respective neighboring burners of the first plurality of burners.
  • 14. The gas turbine engine of claim 13, wherein the angular position of the second plurality of burners is within 5 degrees of being angularly centered between respective neighboring burners of the first plurality of burners.
  • 15. The gas turbine engine of claim 13, wherein the angular position of the second plurality of burners is within 10 degrees of being angularly centered between respective neighboring burners of the first plurality of burners.
  • 16. The gas turbine engine of claim 11, wherein the symmetric rings of the first and second plurality of burners are arranged so that no burner of the first plurality of burners is located along a common line of radius with a burner of the second plurality of burners.
  • 17. A gas turbine engine comprising:a compressor for supplying compressed air; a can annular combustor for burning fuel in the compressed air to produce a hot gas; and a turbine for expanding the hot gas; wherein the can annular combustor further comprises a plurality of can combustors each comprising: a first stage of burners disposed in a symmetrical circular pattern about a centerline, N being the number of burners in the first stage of burners and 360/N° being an angle of separation between burners of the first stage of burners; a second stage of burners disposed in a symmetrical circular pattern about the centerline, the burners of the second stage of burners being singularly disposed between respective neighboring burners of the first stage of burners, N being the number of burners in the second stage of burners and 360/N° being an angle of separation between burners of the second stage of burners; and an angular separation between burners of the first stage of burners and neighboring burners of the second stage of burners being an angle not equal to 360/2N°.
  • 18. The gas turbine engine of claim 17, further comprising:the first stage of burners disposed in a circular pattern having a first radius about the centerline; and the second stage of burners disposed in a circular pattern having a second radius about the centerline not equal to the first radius.
US Referenced Citations (24)
Number Name Date Kind
3153323 Hamm Oct 1964 A
3763650 Hussey et al. Oct 1973 A
3938324 Hammond, Jr. et al. Feb 1976 A
4100733 Striebel et al. Jul 1978 A
4265085 Fox et al. May 1981 A
4417439 Sepulveda et al. Nov 1983 A
4928481 Joshi et al. May 1990 A
4991398 Clark et al. Feb 1991 A
5095696 Gulati et al. Mar 1992 A
5307621 Glassman et al. May 1994 A
5353599 Johnson et al. Oct 1994 A
5372008 Sood Dec 1994 A
5400587 Keller et al. Mar 1995 A
5402634 Marshall Apr 1995 A
5491970 Davis, Jr. et al. Feb 1996 A
5551228 Mick et al. Sep 1996 A
5623826 Ohtsuka et al. Apr 1997 A
5685139 Mick et al. Nov 1997 A
5974781 Correa et al. Nov 1999 A
5983643 Kiesow Nov 1999 A
6082111 Stokes Jul 2000 A
6119459 Gomez et al. Sep 2000 A
6145297 Nagafuchi et al. Nov 2000 A
6189314 Yamamoto et al. Feb 2001 B1
Foreign Referenced Citations (1)
Number Date Country
411344224 Dec 1999 JP