1. Technical Field
The present invention relates generally to miniature hearing aids, acoustic and otherwise, which are fitted deeply in the ear canal.
2. Description of the Prior Art
Conventional hearing aids provide sound amplification selected based on individual hearing loss. It is well known in the field of hearing aids that turning such devices OFF while being worn in the ear causes additional hearing loss to the wearer. This loss, referred to sometimes as “insertion loss”, occurs due to the occlusion of the ear canal by the hearing device. This occlusion prevents sounds from reaching the eardrum directly via the ear canal (see e.g., Sandlin, Hearing Instrument Science & Fitting Practices, National Institute for Hearing Instruments Studies, 1996, pp. 358).
It is also well known in the field of hearing aids that the unoccluded (open) ear canal (1 in
For the above reasons, a hearing aid is typically either worn with amplification ON, or removed from the ear and turned OFF for conserving battery power. It is conceivable that a hearing device may be worn OFF for achieving sound attenuation with the device acting essentially as an earplug. However, this is clearly not a desirable scenario for the hearing impaired who already suffer from hearing loss and cannot afford the additional loss. An acoustic vent across a hearing device is typically employed in conventional aids for variety of reasons including allowing certain frequency ranges to bypass the device and reach the eardrum via the vent. However, venting is useful mainly in conjunction with amplification provided by the ON in-situ device. Hence, vents do not substitute for the natural unaided response when an in-situ device is in the OFF condition.
More practical means of reducing current consumption, without resorting to shutting of the device, include volume reduction. However, volume reduction does not reduce power consumption proportional to the reduction nor does it restore the natural perception of unaided hearing.
Reducing the power consumption has always been a major goal in hearing aid design. In programmable hearing aids, for example, circuit elements can be selectively turned off depending on the operating condition required by the user. Martin et. al. for example, in U.S. Pat. No. 5,710,820 describe a hearing aid in which “function blocks not required for the selected operating condition are deactivated and bridged (cut out), so that only the current respectively required for the active function blocks is drawn from the battery 35.”
Recent advances have lead to the development of extended-wear (semi-permanent) canal hearing devices, which are operated continuously in the ear canal for several months before battery depletion and removal. These canal hearing devices are totally inconspicuous thus cosmetically appealing to the users. Turning these extended-wear devices OFF during sleep or inactivity is desirable on one hand for reducing power consumption and extending the battery life of the device. However, turning these devices OFF in-situ causes an insertion loss as described above. The insertion loss is problematic for these users since it further limits their hearing ability , particularly in emergency situations (fire alarm, horn blowing, traffic sounds, etc.). Another problem caused by the insertion loss of hearing aids in general is the inability to hear sounds naturally in a similar manner as in the unaided condition. Removal of the extended-wear devices to restore unaided hearing contradicts the intended purpose of their continuous wear.
A key goal of the present invention is to provide a canal device and a method thereof for reproducing the unaided response while the hearing device is worn in the ear canal.
Another goal of the present invention is to significantly reduce the power consumption of a canal hearing device in-situ while simultaneously producing the experience of unaided hearing.
The device and method of the present invention provide a power-saving mode of operation offering acoustic transparency, particularly suited for canal hearing devices during sleep or inactivity. Acoustic transparency is accomplished by providing an in-situ acoustic transfer function that compensates for the insertion loss caused by the presence of a hearing device in the ear canal. The transparent mode simulates the user's experience of unaided hearing, thus causing the user to perceive the acoustic “absence” of a hearing device while a device is worn in the ear canal. This mode also significantly reduces current drain from the battery for extending the life of the hearing device. Current reduction is achieved by shutting off one or more circuit elements and by reducing bias currents to other elements.
The invention essentially reproduces the unaided hearing function while providing significant power savings without resorting to removing the device from the ear canal. It allows the user to continue to hear and respond to emergency situations as if the device were not present in the ear canal. The invention is particularly applicable for extended wear applications in which a specialized hearing device is worn continuously in the ear canal for several months without daily removal. The invention is also applicable for disposable hearing devices wherein the longevity of the integrated battery is desirable for the user.
The above and still further goals, objectives, features, aspects and attendant advantages of the present invention will be better understood from the following detailed description of the best mode presently contemplated for practicing the invention, with reference to certain preferred embodiments and methods, taken in conjunction with the accompanying Figures of drawing, in which:
The present invention, illustrated in
The transparent mode significantly reduces current drain from the battery for extending the life of the hearing device. Current reduction is achieved by shutting off one or more circuit elements and/or by reducing bias currents to other elements. The invention essentially restores the unaided hearing function while providing significant power savings, all without resorting to removing the device from the ear canal.
In the exemplary embodiments shown in
In the analog embodiment of
In the normal ON operation, bias currents from bias lines 37 and 38 are relatively high. This is due to the relatively high amplification (gain) requirement of the hearing device 10. However, when the digital controller 33 is appropriately invoked by the user, the control signals 40 are switched to reflect the transparency mode. This causes the power controller to reduce bias currents substantially since the gain requirements are relatively lower than ON gain requirements. Furthermore, input amplifier 34 is preferably completely shut off (zero bias current from bias line 37) during the transparency mode in the embodiment of FIG. 2. In this case, the microphone output 31 is switched directly to programmable filter 39 input via analog switch 41. Bias current to the microphone 20 via microphone bias line 44 is also reduced during sleep mode of the present invention.
In each of these embodiments, the sleep (transparent) mode of the device is preset to produce an in-situ response substantially similar to the unaided response (i.e., mirroring the response that would be perceived by the hearing of the impaired individual if no hearing device were present in the ear canal). Thus, the wearer receives the benefit of being able to leave the device in place in the ear, without experiencing the occlusion that would otherwise be present if the transparent mode of the invention were not provided in the hearing device.
The transparent mode is particularly desirable for extended wear canal hearing devices, which are worn continuously in the ear canal for several months without daily removal. Since the user does not remove the device from the ear on a daily basis, as he or she would with conventional hearing aids, the transparent mode allows the user to perceive sounds as though they were “unaided,” and allows the device to conserve energy to enable extended wear. The transparency mode is most suitable during sleep and resting, since it is during those times that users of conventional hearing aids generally prefer to remove the device from the ear to avoid prolonged and unnecessary amplification, and consequent noise-induced fatigue and irritation. Turning an in-situ device OFF for extended wear applications causes insertion loss which interferes with communications and further presents a potential hazard during emergency situations (i.e., fire alarm, traffic, etc.).
In the preferred embodiments of the present invention as described above, however, the aided response in the transparent mode is adjusted or preset to yield an overall response in-situ substantially similar to the unaided response. In those embodiments, the aided response in the sleep mode is within 6 decibels (db) of the unaided response, particularly in the range of 125 to 4,000 Hertz (Hz). The prescription of the device depends on the position of the device in the ear canal, and particularly the distance and air volume between the receiver 21 and eardrum 4 (FIG. 1). For a particular hearing device, the sleep mode prescription may be generic, based on a generalized ear model; or it may be specific, based on measured unaided and aided responses.
The transparent mode is also applicable for other types of hearing devices such as disposable hearing aids with integrated battery. In such applications, the hearing device is disposed of when its integrated battery is depleted. The transparent mode improves the longevity of the disposable device, thus reducing the cost of replacement over time. Extended wear canal devices with alternate transducers, such as direct tympanic drive (e.g., see U.S. Pat. No. 6,137,889), are equally suited to benefit from the transparent mode of the present intention.
Five prototypes of canal hearing devices currently under development by InSonus Medical Inc. (assignee of the present invention) were evaluated in terms of current consumption during various modes of operation; namely Full-ON-Gain (FOG) mode, typical ON mode, and transparent mode. FOG mode represents the maximum gain settings available for the device. Typical ON mode represents typical gain settings for the average user, and transparent mode represents a setting offering functional gain generally within 6 decibels of unaided response in the standard audiometric frequency range. The transparent mode causes the hearing device to reduce bias currents to the microphone 20 (
Each of the canal device prototypes comprises a proprietary ultra-low power integrated circuit 30 (model DS-I) according to the embodiment of FIG. 2. The device prototypes were tested using standard hearing aid analyzer equipment (model Fonix 6500 CX manufactured by Frey Electronic) and a standard CIC (Completely-In-the-Canal) coupler simulating the ear canal cavity. The current consumption was measured using a laboratory digital meter (model PROTEK 506).
The current consumption in the FOG, ON and transparent modes was 65.9 microamperes (μA), 40.3 μA and 5.8 μA, respectively, on average for the five prototypes.
The transparent mode reduces power consumption by approximately 91% of maximum settings and by 85% of typical settings.
Although a presently preferred best mode of practicing the invention has been described herein, with reference to certain exemplary embodiments and methods, it will be apparent to those skilled in the art to which the invention pertains, that variations and modifications of the disclosed embodiments and methods may be implemented without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. It is therefore intended that the invention shall be limited only to the extent required by the appended claims and the rules and principles of the applicable law.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3594514 | Wingrove | Jul 1971 | A |
3764748 | Branch et al. | Oct 1973 | A |
3870832 | Fredrickson | Mar 1975 | A |
3882285 | Nunley et al. | May 1975 | A |
4505329 | Hough | Aug 1986 | A |
4628907 | Epley | Dec 1986 | A |
4756312 | Epley | Jul 1988 | A |
4776322 | Hough et al. | Oct 1988 | A |
4817607 | Tatge | Apr 1989 | A |
4840178 | Heide et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4955729 | Marx | Sep 1990 | A |
4957478 | Maniglia | Sep 1990 | A |
5015225 | Hough et al. | Apr 1991 | A |
5015224 | Maniglia | May 1991 | A |
5163957 | Sade et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
5220918 | Heide et al. | Jun 1993 | A |
5259032 | Perkins et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282858 | Bisch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5338287 | Miller et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5425104 | Shennib | Jun 1995 | A |
5456654 | Ball | Oct 1995 | A |
5531787 | Lesinski et al. | Jul 1996 | A |
5554096 | Ball | Sep 1996 | A |
5624376 | Ball et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5654530 | Sauer et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5682020 | Oliveira | Oct 1997 | A |
5701348 | Shennib et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5833626 | Leysieffer | Nov 1998 | A |
6118878 | Jones | Sep 2000 | A |
6128392 | Leysieffer et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6130950 | Martin | Oct 2000 | A |
6408081 | Boesen | Jun 2002 | B1 |
6516073 | Schulz et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6620110 | Schmid | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6643378 | Schumaier | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6648813 | Zilberman et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6658126 | Stern | Dec 2003 | B1 |