This invention relates generally to the field of wireless communications. In particular, the invention relates to a system and method for canceling received signals at the receiver of a wireless device.
The worldwide use of wireless devices such as cellular telephones is growing at a rapid pace. As the number of people using wireless devices increases, the number of features offered by wireless service providers increasingly matches the features offered by traditional land-line telephone service providers. Features such as call waiting, call forwarding, caller identification (caller I.D.), three-way calling, and others are commonly offered by both land-line and wireless service providers. These features operate in the same manner on both wireless devices and land-line telephones. Enhanced 911 (also known as E911) services, however, operate differently on land-line telephones (normally referred to as a “911” call) than on wireless devices.
When a 911 call is placed from a land-line telephone, the 911 reception center receives the call and determines the origin of the call. In case the caller fails, or forgets, to identify his or her location, the 911 reception center is able to obtain the location from which the call was made from the land-line telephone switching network and send emergency personnel to the location of the call.
If instead, an E911 call is placed from a wireless device such as a cellular telephone, the E911 reception center receives the call but cannot determine the origin of the call. If the caller fails, or forgets, to identify his or her location, the E911 reception center is unable to obtain the location of the call because the mobile switching network is different than the land-line telephone switching network. At present, the best that the E911 reception center may possibly do is determine the location of the base station corresponding to the cell from which the call was placed. Unfortunately, typical cells in a cellular system may cover an area with approximately a 30 mile diameter.
A proposed solution to this problem is to use a wireless positioning system that includes satellites and/or pseudolites (base stations) to triangulate the position of a wireless device. The Global Positioning System “GPS,” also known as NAVSTAR, is an example of a satellite based navigation system that may be used by a wireless device in combination with an appropriate GPS receiver to pinpoint its location on earth. The array of GPS satellites transmits highly accurate, time coded information that permits a receiver to calculate its exact location in terms of latitude and longitude on earth as well as the altitude above sea level. The GPS system is designed to provide a base navigation system with accuracy to within 100 meters for non-military use and greater precision for the military.
The space segment of the GPS system is a constellation of satellites orbiting above the earth that contain transmitters, which send highly accurate timing information to GPS receivers on earth. The fully implemented GPS system consists of 21 main operational satellites plus three active spare satellites. These satellites are arranged in six orbits, each orbit containing three or four satellites. The orbital planes form a 55° angle with the equator. The satellites orbit at a height of 10,898 nautical miles (20,200 kilometers) above earth with orbital periods for each satellite of approximately 12 hours.
Each of the orbiting satellites contains four highly accurate atomic clocks. These provide precision timing pulses used to generate a unique binary code (also known as a pseudo random or pseudo noise (PN) code) that is transmitted to earth. The PN code identifies the specific satellite in the constellation. The satellite also transmits a set of digitally coded ephemeris data that completely defines the precise orbit of the satellite. The ephemeris data indicates where the satellite is at any given time, and its location may be specified in terms of the satellite ground track in precise latitude and longitude measurements. The information in the ephemeris data is coded and transmitted from the satellite providing an accurate indication of the exact position of the satellite above the earth at any given time. A ground control station updates the ephemeris data of the satellite once per day to ensure accuracy.
A GPS receiver configured in a wireless device is designed to pick up signals from three, four, or more satellites simultaneously. The GPS receiver decodes the information and, using the time and ephemeris data, calculates the approximate position of the wireless device. The GPS receiver contains a floating-point processor that performs the necessary calculations and may output a decimal display of latitude and longitude as well as altitude on the handset. Readings from three satellites are necessary for latitude and longitude information. A fourth satellite reading is required in order to compute altitude.
Unfortunately, a problem to this solution is that, oftentimes, one or more of the signal sources (from either the satellites and/or pseudolites) will interfere with other signal sources, due to individual signal strength. In a sense, one signal will overwhelm, or jam, other signals, so that computation of the position of the wireless device is not possible. Therefore, there is a need for a cancellation system that cancels the strongest signals until a suitable configuration of signal sources may be detected for computing the position of the wireless device.
A number of technical advances are achieved in the art by implementing a cancellation system in a spread spectrum environment. The cancellation system may be broadly conceptualized as a system for allowing weaker received signals from the cancellation system to be detected from other stronger received signals that may potentially overwhelm the weaker received signals.
For example, a cancellation system may utilize a system architecture that delays the received signals and cancels less than all the received signals from the delayed version of the received signals. An implementation of this system architecture may include a delay circuit, a demodulation and despreader unit, a re-modulator and re-spreader unit and a combiner. The delay circuit produces a delayed version of the received signals and the demodulator and de-spreader unit produces a demodulated and de-spread signal corresponding to one of the received signals. The respreader and remodulator unit produces a remodulated and respread signal from the demodulated and despread signal and the combiner produces a combined signal from the delayed version of the received signals and the remodulated and respread signal. Conceptually, the combined signal is the result of canceling a strong received signal from the other received signals in order to detect a weaker signal within the stronger received signals.
As another example, the cancellation system may also utilize a system architecture that stores the received signals and cancels less than all the received signals from the stored version of the received signals. An implementation of this system architecture may include a matched filter, a storage unit, a remodulator and respreader unit, and a combiner. The storage unit stores the received signals and the matched filter produces a demodulated and despread signal corresponding to one of the received signals. The remodulator and respreader unit produces a remodulated and respread signal from the output of the matched filter and the combiner produces a combined signal from the output of the storage unit and the remodulated and respread signal. Again the combined signal is conceptually the result of canceling a strong received signal from the other received signals in order to detect a weaker signal within the stronger received signals.
Other systems, methods, features and advantages of the invention will be or will become apparent to one with skill in the art upon examination of the following figures and detailed description. It is intended that all such additional systems, methods, features and advantages be included within this description, be within the scope of the invention, and be protected by the accompanying claims.
The invention can be better understood with reference to the following figures. The components in the figures are not necessarily to scale, emphasis instead being placed upon illustrating the principals of the invention. Moreover, in the figures, like reference numerals designate corresponding parts throughout the different views.
A typical GPS system has approximately 12 satellites that may be visible at any one time to a wireless device. Global Positioning System or “GPS” means any system utilizing satellites and/or land-based communications devices for providing or enabling the determination of a location of the wireless device on the earth, for example but not limited to: NAVSTAR, GLONASS, LORAN, Shoran, Decca, or TACAN.
In
The demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195 and the delay unit 210 are in signal communication with a radio frequency (RF) front end 265 of the wireless device 10. The demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195 are also in signal communication with the remodulator and respreader units 215, 220 and 225, and the data decoders 235, 240 and 245 via signal connections 270, 275 and 280, respectively. For illustration purposes,
As the wireless device 10 receives signals from the plurality of satellites, the received signals are processed by the RF front end 265 and passed to the banks of demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195. The RF front end 265 is a general radio receiver front end including filters, an antenna, and amplifiers that have been designed to receive signals from the satellites and/or pseudolites. Examples of the RF front end 265 may selectively be a “Gemini/Pisces Monopack R6732-13” integrated circuit available from Conexant Systems, Inc., “GRF1 SiRFstarI” and “GRF2i SiRFstarIIe” architectures available from SiRF Technology, Inc., “MGPSCS-A1” GPS Chipset, “PSRF111A” RF module, and/or “MRFIC1502” Integrated GPS down converter from Motorola, Inc., and/or the “UAA1570HL” GPS front-end receiver circuit from Philips, Inc.
The received signals are then processed by the demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195 and passed to the data decoders 235, 240 and 245 and the remodulator and respreader units 215, 220 and 225, respectively. The demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195 first demodulate the received signals by removing the carrier signal components of the received signals and then despread the demodulated received signals by despreading the signals with the PN codes corresponding to the different satellites. The data decoders 235, 240 and 245 receive the demodulated and despread signals from the demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195 (via signal connections 270, 275 and 280) and decode any data contained on the demodulated and despread signals.
The controller 260 controls and monitors the operation of the data decoders 235, 240, 245, 250 and 255 via the signal bus 285. The controller 260 monitors the decoding process of the data decoders 235, 240, 245, 250 and 255 and determines if a sufficient number of satellites have been identified in order to calculate the location of the wireless device 10. Three satellites are needed to calculate the location of the wireless device 10 in terms of latitude and longitude and four satellites are needed to calculate the location of the wireless device 10 in terms of latitude, longitude and altitude. The controller 260 may be any general-purpose processor such as an Intel XXX86, Motorola 68XXX or PowerPC, or other equivalent processor. Alternatively, a GPS-specific circuit or oriented device may selectively be utilized. Additionally, the controller 260 may also be integrated into a signal semiconductor chip such as an Application Specific Integrated Chip (ASIC) or Reduced Instruction Set Computer (RISC), or may be implemented via a Digital Signal Processor (DSP) chip. Examples of GPS-oriented devices include the “Scorpio 11577-11” digital integrated circuit produced by Conexant Systems, Inc., “GSP1 SiRFstar I” and “GSP2e SiRFstart II” architectures available from SiRF Technology, Inc., “MGPSCS-A1” and “MMC2003” from Motorola, Inc., and the “SAA1575HL” GPS baseband processor from Philips, Inc.
For example, if an insufficient number of satellites have been identified, the controller 260 first determines how many satellites have been properly identified and then proceeds to search for additional satellite signals by removing the identified signals from the received signals. This procedure basically power filters the received signals from the RF front end 265 by removing the higher power satellite signals from the received signals. In this manner the cancellation system 180 compensates for the varying received signal strengths and detects the lower power (i.e., weaker) received signals that would normally be hidden by the higher power received signals.
The controller 260 performs this power filtering by instructing the remodulator and respreader units 215, 220 and 225 to remodulate and respread the signals received via signal connections 270, 275 and 280 and send the resulting signals to the combiner 230 via signal connections 295, 300 and 305, respectively. The combiner 230 is a general arithmetic circuit that combines the signals from signal connections 295, 300 and 305 with the signal from the delay circuit 210. The delay circuit 210 is a circuit that delays the received signal from the RF front end 265 by a time delay equal to the time necessary to propagate a signal from the RF front end 265 through one of the demodulator and despread units 185, 190 or 195 and one of the remodulator and respreader units 215, 220 or 225 to the combiner 230.
The combiner 230 then subtracts the signals (received via signal connections 295, 300 and 305) from the delayed signal (received via signal connection 290) and sends the result to demodulator and despreader units 200 and 205, which demodulate and despread the resultant signal in a fashion similar to demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195. The resulting demodulated and despread signals are then decoded for satellite information data via data decoders 250 and 255. The data decoders 250 and 255 utilize the information from the demodulator and despreader units 200 and 205 to determine the range or pseudo-range measurements.
If the C/N0 (signal to noise density ratio) is sufficient to detect a satellite and if the operation of the cancellation system 180 is continuous in nature, a 50 Hz data signal from a satellite may also selectively be demodulated. The 50 Hz data signal is a low frequency modulated data signal on the PN code transmission that represents the updated orbital location of the satellites.
It is appreciated for illustration purposes that only two of the approximate 12 demodulator and despreader units are shown (185 and 190 in
As another example, if an insufficient number of satellites have been identified, the controller 260 also monitors the decoding process of data decoders 250 and 255 searching for power filtered satellite signals. Again for illustration purposes only two of the approximate 12 data decoders have been shown. In this example, signals from the demodulator and despreader units 185, 190 and 195 are automatically remodulated and respread by remodulator and respreader units 215, 220 and 225 and the outputs combined in the combiner 230 with the delayed signal from the delay circuit 210. The resultant signals from the combiner 230 are then demodulated and despread with demodulator and despreader units 200 and 205 and the data is decoded with data decoders 250 and 255. The demodulation, despreading, remodulation, respreading and signal removal operations may because the delay circuit 210 may be configured as a storage device such as random access memory (RAM) or other static memory realization.
The first mixer 320 utilizes the carrier frequency generator 310 to remove the carrier signal from the received signal (i.e., demodulate) from the RF front end 265 and the second mixer 325 utilizes the PN code generator 315 to despread the demodulated signal from the first mixer 320. The filter 330 then removes any harmonics and other unnecessary frequency components from the demodulated and despread signal and outputs the resulting signal via signal connection 270.
The first mixer 365 utilizes the PN code generator 355 to spread the signal received (via signal connection 270) and the second mixer 370 utilizes the carrier frequency generator 360 to add a carrier signal (i.e., modulate) to the spread signal from the first mixer 365. The second mixer 370 then sends the resulting signal to the combiner 230,
In addition to producing a demodulated and despread signal for a specific satellite, the matched filter unit 390 also estimates the signal amplitude and the carrier and code frequency and phase values. These values may be utilized to set the remodulator and respreader unit 395 to accurately remove the detected strong signal. If the controller 415 determines that sufficient signals have been obtained to determine the position of the wireless device 10, the controller 415 instructs the switch 405, via a controller bus 420, to send the combined signal to a data decoder 410 to decode the signal.
If the controller 415 instead determines that additional signals are needed, the controller 415 instructs the switch 405, via the control bus 420, to send the result from the combiner 400 back to the matched filter unit 390 and the storage unit 388 via the feedback signal path 425. The process then repeats using the same matched filter 390 and remodulator and respreader unit 395 on the new combined signal from the combiner 400. This process is iterated until the controller 415 determines that a sufficient number of signals have been detected to calculate the position of the wireless device 10. The matched filter 390 and the remodulator and respreader unit 395 may have selectively the same physical circuitry (such as one integrated circuit), applied multiple times by the controller 415. It is appreciated that the combination of the matched filter unit 390 and remodulator and respreader unit 395 may be selectively repeated in multiple stages instead of using an iterative feedback approach without deviating from the implementation described.
An advantage of using the matched filter 390 is that the detection of the stronger signals also provides a reference for the amplitude and phase of the strong signals to be cancelled out. These estimates are inherently related to the stored data from which the strong signals will be removed, and then reprocessed by the matched filter 390 in searching for the next strongest signal. This process functions particularly well with spread spectrum systems like GPS and GLONASS because the residuals of the strong signals that are not removed still appear as uncorrelated noise relative to the signals still to be detected.
If instead the controller 260 determines 445 that an insufficient number of satellite signals have been obtained, the cancellation system 180 respreads and remodulates 455 the signals obtained from the demodulation and despreader units and sends the results to combiner 230 (illustrated in
The cancellation system 180 then demodulates and despreads 465 the output from the combiner 230 and passes the demodulated and despread output of the combiner 230 to the data decoders that decode 470 the demodulated and despread output of the combiner 230. If the cancellation system 180 has obtained a sufficient number of satellites 445, the process ends 450. If any additional satellites are still needed 445 the process repeats 455 through 470 until a sufficient number of satellites are obtained.
The software program 480 comprises an ordered listing of executable instructions for implementing logical functions. The software 480 may be embodied in any computer-readable medium for use by or in connection with an instruction execution system, apparatus, or device, such as a computer-based system, processor-containing system, or other system that may selectively fetch the instructions from the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device and execute the instructions. In the context of this document, a “computer-readable medium” is any means that may contain, store, communicate, propagate, or transport the program for use by or in connection with the instruction execution system, apparatus, or device. The computer readable medium may be for example, but not limited to, an electronic, magnetic, optical, electromagnetic, infrared, or semiconductor system, apparatus, device, or propagation medium. More specific examples (a non-exhaustive list) of the computer-readable medium would include the following: an electrical connection (electronic) having one or more wires, a portable computer diskette (magnetic), a RAM (electronic), a read-only memory (ROM) (electronic), an erasable programmable read-only memory (EPROM or Flash memory) (electronic), an optical fiber (optical), and a portable compact disc read-only memory (CDROM) (optical). Note that the computer-readable medium may even be paper or another suitable medium upon which the program is printed, as the program can be electronically captured, via for instance optical scanning of the paper or other medium, then compiled, interpreted or otherwise processed in a suitable manner if necessary, and then stored in a computer memory.
The wireless device 500 includes a RF front end 560 (similar to RF front end 265 in
The main difference in the implementation illustrated in
If instead, the stationary communication device 505 determines that the wireless device did not detect all the available satellites 610 the stationary communication device 505 then additionally transmits a record that includes information to assist the cancellation system 495. The record may include satellite location, power, frequency, phase and other data that will help the cancellation system 495 detect the missing signals. The wireless device 500 receives this record 620 and the controller 570 instructs the cancellation system 495 to detect the missing signals based on the received record. The process then ends 615.
The geographic position of a wireless device may be calculated once a sufficient number of satellite signals are received at the wireless device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,087 entitled “Method and Apparatus For Satellite Positioning System Based Time Measurement,” issued to Norman F. Krasner on Sep. 22, 1998, which is incorporated by reference, describes a method and apparatus for measuring time related to satellite data signals in satellite positioning systems. The measured time is used to calculate the position of the wireless device. U.S. Pat. No. 5,812,087 discloses the method and apparatus for establishing receiver timing at the wireless device by having a GPS receiver of the wireless device form an estimate of a portion of the satellite data message and transmit the estimate to a base station. The base station compares this estimate with a record of the satellite data signals received from another GPS receiver at the base station. The comparison determines which portion of the base station's data most closely matches the data transmitted by the wireless device and the result of the comparison is transmitted back to the wireless device for reference. The time measurements may also be implemented in the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,944, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Determining Time For GPS Receivers,” issued to Norman F. Krasner on Aug. 31, 1999, which is incorporated by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,945,944 discloses a method and apparatus of determining the time for a global positioning system receiver. Timing signals derived from a communication system, such as cellular phone transmission signals, are received by a GPS receiver and decoded to provide accurate time information. The timing signals may be in the form of synchronized events marked by timing indicators, or as system time information. The timing signals in combination with satellite position signals received by the GPS receiver are used to determine the position of the GPS receiver. The time measurements may also be implemented in an obstructive environment by the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,574, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Determining the Location Of An Object Which May Have An Obstructed View Of The Sky,” issued to Norman F. Krasner on Nov. 3, 1998 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,016,119, entitled “Method And Apparatus For Determining The Location Of An Object Which May Have An Obstructed View Of The Sky,” issued to Norman F. Krasner on Jan. 18, 2000, which are both incorporated by reference.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,831,574 discloses a positioning sensor that receives and stores a predetermined record length of positioning signals while in a fix position located such that the positioning sensor can receive positioning signals. Thereafter, the stored positioning signals are processed to determine the geographic location of the fix position. The fix position may correspond to a location of an object of interest or it may be in a known location relative to the position of the object, in which case once the geographic location of the fix position has been computed, the geographic location of the object can be derived. The positioning sensor includes a Snapshot GPS receiver which may collect and process GPS signals transmitted by GPS satellites using fast convolution operations to compute pseudoranges from the GPS satellites to the fix position. Alternatively, these computations may be performed at a basestation. The computed pseudoranges may then be used to determine the geographic location of the fix position. The positioning sensor may be equipped with a depth sensing elements, such as a pressure sensor, which allows a determination of the depth of a submerged object to be made. The positioning sensor may further be equipped with signal detecting means for determining when the positioning sensor is in the fix position.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,016,119 discloses a positioning sensor which receives and stores a predetermined record length of positioning signals while in a fix position located such that the positioning sensor can receive positioning signals. Thereafter, the stored positioning signals are processed to determine the geographic location of the fix position. The fix position may correspond to a location of an object of interest or it may be in a known location relative to the position of the object, in which case once the geographic location of the fix position has been computed, the geographic location of the object can be derived. The positioning sensor includes a Snapshot GPS receiver which may collect and process GPS signals transmitted by GPS satellites using fast convolution operations to compute pseudoranges from the GPS satellites to the fix position. Alternatively, these computations may be performed at a basestation. The computed pseudoranges may then be used to determine the geographic location of the fix position. The positioning sensor may be equipped with depth sensing means, such as a pressure sensor, which allows a determination of the depth of a submerged object to be made. The positioning sensor may further be equipped with signal detecting means for determining when the positioning sensor is in the fix position.
After processing by the cancellation system, the wireless device may make the time measurements based on the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,214, entitled “GPS Receiver And Method For Processing GPS Signals,” issued to Norman F. Krasner on Mar. 16, 1999, which is incorporated by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,884,214 discloses a global positioning system (GPS) receiver having first circuitry for receiving and processing pseudorandom sequences transmitted by a number of GPS satellites. The first circuitry is configured to perform conventional correlation operations on the received pseudorandom sequences to determine pseudoranges from the GPS receiver to the GPS satellites. The GPS receiver also includes second circuitry coupled to the first circuitry. The second circuitry is configured to receive and process the pseudorandom sequences during blockage conditions. The second circuitry processes the pseudorandum sequences by digitizing and storing a predetermined record length of the received sequences and then performing fast convolution operations on the stored data to determine the pseudoranges. The GPS receiver may have a common circuitry for receiving GPS signals from in view satellites and downconverting the RF frequency of the received GPS signals to an intermediate frequency (IF). The IF signals are split into two signal path, a first of which provides the conventional correlation processing to calculate the pseudoranges. During blockage conditions, the IF signal is passed to the second signal path wherein the IF signals are digitized and stored in memory and later processed using the fast convolution operations to provide the pseudoranges. Alternative arrangements for the two signal paths include separate downconverters or shared digitizers. One embodiment provides both signal paths on a single integrated circuit with shared circuitry executing computer readable instructions to perform GPS signal processing appropriate to the reception conditions.
Additionally, the wireless device may make the time measurements based on the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,781,156, entitled “GPS Receiver And Method For Processing GPS Signals”, which is incorporated by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,781,156 discloses a GPS receiver in one embodiment which includes an antenna which receives GPS signals at an RF frequency from in view satellites; a downconverter coupled to the antenna for reducing the RF frequency of the received GPS signals to an intermediate frequency (IF); a digitizer coupled to the downconverter and sampling the IF GPS signals at a predetermined rate to produce sampled IF GPS signals; a memory coupled to the digitizer storing the sampled IF GPS signals (a snapshot of GPS signals); and a digital signal processor (DPS) coupled to the memory and operating under stored instructions thereby performing Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) operations on the sampled IF GPS signals to provide pseudorange information. These operations typically also include preprocessing and post processing of the GPS signals. After a snapshot of data is taken, the receiver front end is powered down. The GPS receiver in one embodiment also includes other power management features and includes, in another embodiment the capability to correct for errors in its local oscillator which is used to sample the GPS signals. The calculation speed of pseudoranges, and sensitivity of operation, is enhanced by the transmission of the Doppler frequency shifts of in view satellites to the receiver from an external source, such as a basestation in one embodiment of the invention.
Additionally, an example implementation of the time measurement utilizing the assistance of a base station may be implemented in the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,874,914, entitled “GPS Receiver Utilizing A Communication Link,” issued to Norman F. Kasner on Feb. 23, 1999, which is incorporated by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,874,914 discloses a GPS receiver in one embodiment which includes an antenna which receives GPS signals at an RF frequency from in view satellites; a downconverter coupled to the antenna for reducing the RF frequency of the received GPS signals to an intermediate frequency (IF); a digitizer coupled to the downconverter and sampling the IF GPS signals at a predetermined rate to produce sampled IF GPS signals; a memory coupled to the digitizer storing the sampled IF GPS signals (a snapshot of GPS signals); and a digital signal processor (DPS) coupled to the memory and operating under stored instructions thereby performing Fast Fourier Transform (FFT) operations on the sampled IF GPS signals to provide pseudorange information. These operations typically also include preprocessing and post processing of the GPS signals. After a snapshot of data is taken, the receiver front end is powered down. The GPS receiver in one embodiment also includes other power management features and includes, in another embodiment, the capability to correct for errors in its local oscillator which is used to sample the GPS signals. The calculation speed of pseudoranges, and sensitivity of operation, is enhanced by the transmission of the Doppler frequency shifts of in view satellites to the receiver from an external source, such as a basestation in one embodiment of the invention.
Additionally, another example implementation of the time measurement utilizing the assistance of a base station may be implemented in the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,396, entitled “GPS Receiver Utilizing A Communication Link,” issued to Norman F. Krasner on Nov. 24, 1998, which is incorporated by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,841,396 discloses a precision carrier frequency signal for calibrating a local oscillator of a GPS receiver which is used to acquire GPS signals. The precision carrier frequency signal is used to calibrate the local oscillator such that the output of the local oscillator, which is used to acquire GPS signals, is modified by a reference signal generated from the precision carrier frequency signal. The GPS receiver locks to this precision carrier frequency signal and generates the reference signal. In another aspect of the invention, satellite almanac data is transmitted to a remote GPS receiver unit from a base station via a communication link. The remote GPS receiver unit uses this satellite almanac data to determine approximate Doppler data for satellites in view of the remote GPS receiver unit.
Still another example implementation of the time measurement utilizing the assistance of a base station may be implemented in the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,124, entitled “Satellite Positioning System Augmentation With Wireless Communication Signals,” issued to Leonid Sheynblant on Dec. 7, 1999, which is incorporated by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 5,999,124 discloses a method and apparatus for processing position information from satellite positioning system satellites and from cellular based communication signals. In one example of a method according to the invention, a SPS receiver receives SPS signals from at least one SPS satellite. This SPS receiver is coupled to and typically integrated with a communication system which receives and transmits messages in a cell based communication system. In this method, a message is transmitted in the cell based communication signals between a communication system and a first cell based transceiver. A time measurement which represents a time of travel of a message in the cell based communication signals between the cell based transceiver and the communication system is determined. Another time measurement that represents a time of travel of the SPS signals is also determined. A position of the SPS receiver is determined from a combination of at least the time measurement which represents the time of travel of a message in the cell based communication signals and from a time measurement which represents a time travel of the SPS signals. The cell based communication signals are capable of communicating data messages in a two-way direction in one embodiment between the cell based transceiver and the communication system.
Another example implementation of the time measurement utilizing the assistance of a base station may be implemented in the system described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,363, entitled “Combined GPS Positioning System And Communications System Utilizing Shared Circuitry,” issued to Norman F. Krasner and is incorporated by reference. U.S. Pat. No. 6,002,363 discloses a combined GPS and communication system having shared circuitry. The combined system includes an antenna for receiving data representative of GPS signals, a frequency converter coupled to the antenna, a frequency synthesizer coupled to the frequency converter, an analog to digital converter coupled to the frequency converter and a processor coupled to the frequency converter. The processor processes the data representative of GPS signals to determine a pseudorange based on the data representative of GPS signals to determine a pseudorange based on the data representative of GPS signals. The integrated communication receiver includes a shared component which is at least one of the antenna, the frequency converter, the frequency synthesizer and the analog to digital converter. Typically, in certain embodiments, the processor also demodulates communication signals received as well as controls the modulation of data to be transmitted as a communication signal through a communication link.
While various embodiments of the application have been described, it will be apparent to those of ordinary skill in the art that many more embodiments and implementations are possible that are within the scope of this invention. Accordingly, the invention is not to be restricted except in light of the attached claims and their equivalents.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3604911 | Schmitt | Sep 1971 | A |
3975628 | Graves et al. | Aug 1976 | A |
4426712 | Gorski-Popiel | Jan 1984 | A |
4445118 | Taylor et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4463357 | MacDoran | Jul 1984 | A |
4578678 | Hurd | Mar 1986 | A |
4667203 | Counselman, III | May 1987 | A |
4701934 | Jasper | Oct 1987 | A |
4754465 | Trimble | Jun 1988 | A |
4785463 | Janc et al. | Nov 1988 | A |
4809005 | Counselman, III | Feb 1989 | A |
4821294 | Thomas, Jr. | Apr 1989 | A |
4890233 | Ando et al. | Dec 1989 | A |
4894662 | Counselman | Jan 1990 | A |
4894842 | Broekhoven et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4992720 | Hata | Feb 1991 | A |
4998111 | Ma et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
5014066 | Counselman, III | May 1991 | A |
5018088 | Higbie | May 1991 | A |
5036329 | Ando | Jul 1991 | A |
5043736 | Darnell et al. | Aug 1991 | A |
5101416 | Fenton et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5108334 | Eschenbach et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5148042 | Nakazoe | Sep 1992 | A |
5153591 | Clark | Oct 1992 | A |
5179724 | Lindoff | Jan 1993 | A |
5202829 | Geier | Apr 1993 | A |
5225842 | Brown et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5253268 | Omura et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5276765 | Fremman et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5293170 | Lorenz et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5293398 | Hamao et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5297097 | Etoh et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5311195 | Mathis et al. | May 1994 | A |
5323164 | Endo | Jun 1994 | A |
5343209 | Sennott et al. | Aug 1994 | A |
5345244 | Gildea et al. | Sep 1994 | A |
5347536 | Meehan | Sep 1994 | A |
5352970 | Armstrong, II | Oct 1994 | A |
5363030 | Ford et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5378155 | Eldridge | Jan 1995 | A |
5379224 | Brown et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5381447 | Ayerst et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
5396515 | Dixon et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402346 | Lion et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5402347 | McBurney et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5410747 | Ohmagari et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5416712 | Geier et al. | May 1995 | A |
5418818 | Marchetto et al. | May 1995 | A |
5420593 | Niles | May 1995 | A |
5440313 | Osterdock et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
5450344 | Woo et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5498239 | Galel et al. | Mar 1996 | A |
5504684 | Lau et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5546445 | Dennison et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5548613 | Kahu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5550811 | Kahu et al. | Aug 1996 | A |
5568473 | Hemmati | Oct 1996 | A |
5577023 | Marum et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5577025 | Skinner et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5592173 | Lau et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5594453 | Rodal et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
5608722 | Miller | Mar 1997 | A |
5623485 | Bi | Apr 1997 | A |
5625668 | Loomis et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5640429 | Michaels et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5640431 | Bruckert et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5642377 | Chung et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
5644591 | Sutton | Jul 1997 | A |
5644592 | Divsalar et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5649000 | Lee et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5650792 | Moore et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5654718 | Beason et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5663734 | Krasner | Sep 1997 | A |
5663735 | Eshenbach | Sep 1997 | A |
5689814 | Hagisawa et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5722061 | Hutchison, IV et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5734674 | Fenton et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5734966 | Farrer et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
5737329 | Horiguchi | Apr 1998 | A |
5739596 | Takizawa et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5749067 | Barrett | May 1998 | A |
5781156 | Krasner | Jul 1998 | A |
5784695 | Upton et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
5786789 | Janky | Jul 1998 | A |
5790537 | Yoon et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5812087 | Krasner | Sep 1998 | A |
5825327 | Krasner | Oct 1998 | A |
5828694 | Schipper | Oct 1998 | A |
5831574 | Krasner | Nov 1998 | A |
5832021 | Kondo | Nov 1998 | A |
5841396 | Krasner | Nov 1998 | A |
5845203 | LaDue | Dec 1998 | A |
5852630 | Langberg et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5854605 | Gildea | Dec 1998 | A |
5862465 | Ou | Jan 1999 | A |
5867535 | Phillips et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5867795 | Novis et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5872540 | Casabona et al. | Feb 1999 | A |
5874914 | Krasner | Feb 1999 | A |
5877724 | Davis | Mar 1999 | A |
5877725 | Kalafus | Mar 1999 | A |
5881371 | Reynolds | Mar 1999 | A |
5883594 | Lau | Mar 1999 | A |
5884214 | Krasner | Mar 1999 | A |
5889474 | LaDue | Mar 1999 | A |
5903654 | Milton et al. | May 1999 | A |
5907809 | Molnar et al. | May 1999 | A |
5909640 | Farrer et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917444 | Loomis et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5917829 | Hertz et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5920283 | Shaheen et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5923703 | Pon et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5924024 | Ikeda et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5926131 | Sakumoto et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5936572 | Loomis et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5943363 | Hanson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5945944 | Krasner | Aug 1999 | A |
5956328 | Sato | Sep 1999 | A |
5963582 | Stansell, Jr. | Oct 1999 | A |
5970084 | Honda | Oct 1999 | A |
5974039 | Schilling | Oct 1999 | A |
5977909 | Harrison et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5982324 | Watters et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5987016 | He | Nov 1999 | A |
5991309 | Jensen et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5991613 | Euscher et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5995537 | Kondo | Nov 1999 | A |
5999124 | Sheynblat | Dec 1999 | A |
6002362 | Gudat | Dec 1999 | A |
6002363 | Krasner | Dec 1999 | A |
6002709 | Hendrickson | Dec 1999 | A |
6009551 | Sheynblat | Dec 1999 | A |
6016119 | Krasner | Jan 2000 | A |
6023462 | Nieczyporowicz et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6041222 | Horton et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6044105 | Gronemeyer | Mar 2000 | A |
6047016 | Ramberg et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6047017 | Cahn et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6049715 | Willhoff et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6052081 | Krasner | Apr 2000 | A |
6061018 | Sheynblat | May 2000 | A |
6064336 | Krasner | May 2000 | A |
6064688 | Yanagi | May 2000 | A |
6075809 | Naruse | Jun 2000 | A |
6075810 | Raghavan et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6075987 | Camp et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6104338 | Krasner | Aug 2000 | A |
6104340 | Krasner | Aug 2000 | A |
6107960 | Krasner | Aug 2000 | A |
6111540 | Krasner | Aug 2000 | A |
6131067 | Girerd et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6133871 | Krasner | Oct 2000 | A |
6133873 | Krasner | Oct 2000 | A |
6133874 | Krasner | Oct 2000 | A |
6150980 | Krasner | Nov 2000 | A |
6236354 | Krasner | May 2001 | B1 |
6240099 | Lim et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6473451 | Seki et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0639901 | Aug 1994 | EP |
0639901 | Aug 1994 | EP |
08065205 | Aug 1996 | JP |
WO 9213392 | Aug 1992 | WO |
WO 0019644 | Apr 2000 | WO |