CANDIDATE SERVING CELL-DETERMINING METHOD OF A MOBILE SUBSCRIBER

Abstract

A candidate serving cell-determining method of a mobile subscriber in cell reselection tasks is disclosed. The mobile subscriber communicates with a mobile network by a serving cell, in which the mobile network comprises a plurality of neighbor cells including the serving cell. The candidate serving cell-determining method comprising the steps of: detecting the signal strengths of neighbor cells; choosing top N cells in signal strength as candidate serving cells; detecting afresh the signal strengths of the neighbor cells, and adding a predetermined weighting strength to each signal strength of the candidate serving cell so as to form the in-list signal strength of the respective candidate serving cell; and choosing top N cells from the neighbor cells by comparing the in-list signal strengths of the candidate serving cells with the real signal strengths of the rest neighbor cells.

Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

The features, objects, and advantages of the present invention will become more apparent from the following detailed description of the preferred embodiment of this invention, with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which:

FIG. 1 illustrates a wireless communication system in prior art;

FIG. 2 is a flow chart of a cell reselection process of the mobile subscriber in prior art;

FIG. 3 illustrates schematically a preferred cell reselection process of the mobile subscriber in accordance with the present invention; and

FIG. 4 is a flow chart of the cell reselection process of FIG. 3.

DETAILED DESCRIPTIONS OF THE PREFERRED EMBODIMENT

For solving the aforesaid problem of the cell reselection, a candidate serving cell-determining method of a mobile subscriber is provided to reduce the power consumption of the mobile subscriber. In the cell reselection process of the mobile subscriber, each of the neighbor cells listed as the candidate serving cells is added by a weighting strength to represent the in-list signal strengths of the candidate serving cells, such that the aforesaid flipping situation in the low-ranked candidate serving cells can be avoided for the signal strength of the candidate serving cell has been elevated to a higher level away from that of those not in the candidate list. Upon such an arrangement, the lowest-ranked cell in the list can be away from the challenge (in signal strength) of the top cell out of the list due to slight strength fluctuation.

After measuring all the neighbor cells every time, the mobile subscriber calculates each average signal strength (also called rxlev) of the neighbor cell in the BCCH allocation list and defines top six cells that have stronger signal strengths to be the candidate serving cells (excluding the current serving cell). In the present invention, each signal strength of the candidate serving cell is added by the weighting strength. Adding the weighting strength is only for a comparison purpose in determining a possible reselection and is not to alter the real signal strengths of both the candidate serving cells and the rest of the neighbor cells.

Please refer to FIG. 3 that illustrates schematically a preferred cell reselection process for the candidate serving cell-determining method in accordance with the present invention. In the first step S31, the mobile subscriber finishes the detection of a plurality of neighbor cells and determines top six neighbor cells NC1 to NC6 having stronger signal strengths than others to be the candidate serving cells 18. All neighbor cells are arranged in the listing, according to the ranking in the signal strength, and named from NC1 to NC10 as shown, in which the six candidate serving cells are labeled as NC1 to NC6. It is noted that the signal strengths of the cells NC6 to NC10 are closed to each other, with Rxlev 36 to NC6 and Rxlev 35 to any of NC7 to NC10. In the present invention, every candidate serving cell 18, from NC1 to NC6, is added by a predetermined weighting strength, 5 dB in this embodiment, to present the in-list signal strength of the candidate serving cell 18. It is noted that the in-list signal strength exists only for the comparison purpose in the cell reselection process of the mobile subscriber, and is not anyhow the real signal strength.

After a predetermined time, in the step S32, the mobile subscriber updates the measurement results. The comparison in the signal strengths of all the neighbor cells NC1-NC10 is performed upon the in-list signal strengths. That is, for example, the comparison between NC6 and NC7 is to compare Rxlev 36+5 of NC6 with Rxlev 37 of NC7. Upon such a comparison basis, the mobile subscriber determines and updates the top six candidate serving cells. After a further predetermined time, the mobile subscriber updates the measurement results again as shown in the step 33.

In the above-mentioned embodiment, any of the NC7-NC10 neighbor cells may be advanced to the candidate serving cell if and only if its real signal strength is ranked in the top six strengths among the in-list signal strengths of NC1-NC6 and the real signal strengths of NC7-NC10. In the case that a renewal in the candidate serving cells is necessary, the mobile subscriber is set to read the BCCH information of the new candidate serving cell. By providing the foregoing comparison method, slight perturbations in the low-ranked neighbor cells (say NC6 to NC10) won't initiate a computation on the FB and SB.

In the present invention, the real signal strength of each current candidate serving cell 18 is always added by the weighting strength 5 dB to obtain the in-list signal strength of the respective candidate serving cell 18 before the mobile subscriber begins every time to re-determine the top six candidate serving cells 18.

It is particular to note that, in the step 32, even the real signal strengths of the NC7 and NC9 are higher than that of the NC6, a renewal in the candidate serving cells won't be initiated for the in-list signal strength of the NC6 is still higher that any real signal strength of the NC7 or NC9.

In step 33, as shown by the new measurement results of all neighbor cells NC1-NC10, the small perturbation in signal strength exists of step S32 is no longer there, and thus the candidate neighbor cells are kept to the same NC1 to NC6 all the way from step S31 through step S33. Therefore, the mobile subscriber will not consume much power to read and process the BCCH information of the possible-change neighbor cells caused by the perturbation in step 32.

Please refer to FIG. 4, which shows a flow chart for the candidate serving cell-determining method of the mobile subscriber of FIG. 3. In step 41, the mobile subscriber performs the process of the cell reselection. Next in step 42, the mobile subscriber detects the signal strengths of all the neighbor cells and updates the measurement result of all the neighbor cells. In step 43, the mobile subscriber determines top N neighbor cells having stronger signal strengths. In step 44, the chosen N cells are listed to the candidate serving cells list.

In step 45, after waiting for a predetermined time, the mobile subscriber detects and updates the measurement results of all the neighbor cells again (step 46). In step 47, each cell in the candidate serving cells list is to have an in-list signal strength by adding a predetermined weighting strength to its real signal strength. In step 48, the top N cells are determined by comparing all the in-list signal strengths of the current candidate serving cells and the real signal strengths of the neighbor cells not in the candidate list. If no change is necessary in the candidacy of the neighbor cells, the mobile subscriber maintains the candidate serving cells list at step 491. Otherwise, in step 492, i.e. if there is any change in the top six cells having stronger signal strength, the mobile subscriber updates the chosen N cells (in step 48) to be the new candidate serving cells. In step 410, the mobile subscriber revokes the adding of the weighting strength to each candidate serving cell in step 47 and then repeats step 45 to step 48.

The weighting strength can be set in a preferable range for 3 dB to 5 dB, for example 5 dB in the above mentioned embodiments. In FIG. 4, the number N can be changed to meet the real situation, for example N to be six in the foregoing embodiments. In the above mentioned embodiments, the mobile subscriber detects the signal strengths of all neighbor cells every time and also updates the signal strengths of the serving cells at the same time. If the signal strength of one of the neighbor cells is higher than any in-list one of the candidate serving cells, the mobile subscriber may update the cell to be the new serving cell immediately.

In the conventional process of the cell reselection, when the signal strengths of the lower-ranked candidate serving cells and the following neighbor cells candidate serving cells are close, the mobile subscriber has no choice but to perform the updating of the candidate serving cells. Thus, such an unnecessary change to meet the temporary (possible) slight perturbation may consume substantially power of the mobile subscriber. On the other hand, the updating method of the candidate serving cells in accordance with the present invention provides the chance of advancing to the serving cell only to those neighbor cells that have obvious advantages in their signal strengths, and thus the group of the candidate serving cells won't be changed frequently while in meeting temporary fluctuation in signal strength. Thereby, the mobile subscriber can still provide good quality of communication, and the power consumption to unnecessary updating of the candidate serving cells can be avoided.

As compared with the conventional process of the cell reselection, the mobile subscriber reduces unnecessary changes of the candidate serving cells. By adding the weighting strength to each candidate serving cells, the mobile subscriber can have more rigid limitations to avoid the aforesaid problem of the unnecessary changes of the candidate serving cells and present its superiority in power saving.

Although the present invention and its advantages have been described in detail, as well as some variations over the disclosed embodiments, it should be understood that various other switches, substitutions and alterations can be made herein without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims

1. A method for a mobile subscriber to determine candidate serving cells, said mobile subscriber communicating with a mobile network by a serving cell, the mobile network comprising said serving cell and a plurality of neighbor cells, the method comprising: (a) detecting signal strengths of said neighbor cells;(b) choosing N neighbor cells with stronger signal strengths than other neighbor cells to be candidate serving cells;(c) detecting the signal strengths of the neighbor cells, adding a predetermined weight strength to all the signal strengths of said candidate serving cells to form new signal strengths of said candidate serving cells; and(d) choosing N neighbor cells with stronger signal strengths than other neighbor cells in step (c).

2. The method according to claim 1, said mobile subscriber having a candidate serving cell list, the method further comprising: in step (b), registering said N cells into the candidate serving cell list; andin said step (d), updating said candidate serving cell list when said N cells in the step (b) being different to said N cells in the step (d).

3. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: (g) detecting a signal strength of said serving cell; and(h) choosing a strongest signal strength of said candidate serving cell if strongest signal strength of said candidate serving cell larger than the signal strength of said serving cell.

4. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: waiting a predetermined time before step (c).

5. The method according to claim 1, wherein said predetermined weighting strength ranges between 3 dB and 5 dB.

6. The method according to claim 1, wherein said N is equal to 6.

7. The method according to claim 1, further comprising: (i) revoking said number N of said plurality of neighbor cells adding said weighting strength respectively;(j) detecting afresh the signal strength of said plurality of neighbor cells, and said chosen number N of said plurality of neighbor cells at the step (d) adding said weighting strength respectively to represent the signal strength of said number N neighbor cells; and(k) choosing number N of said plurality of neighbor cells having strongest signal strength after step (j).