This invention relates to a cannula and cannulated dilator and more particularly to a cannula intended to be utilized in surgery on a patient which cannula is sized by the measurement obtained from the cannulated dilator for obtaining a desired length of the cannula inserted into the body cavity of the patient for ease of the surgical procedure being preformed by the surgeon and the apparatus for insertion of the cannulated dilator and the dilator retractor into the body cavity.
As is known in the medical field, the cannula is utilized for creating a passage extending from the exterior into a cavity in the patient to a particular location where the surgical procedure is to be performed. For example, in current day practices lumbar discectomy whose objective is to decompress the affected nerve root, endoscopic and micro endoscopic techniques are often used. These techniques are becoming popular inasmuch as the patient benefits from the small incision, limited tissue disruption, better visualization and illumination all of which shortens the hospital stay and hastens recovery. One of the techniques for performing the lumbar discectomy is the use of tubular retractor (a specific cannula) which allows for laminotomy, deical facetectomy, foraminotomy, nerve root retraction and disectomy. A typical procedure is to advance a guidewire through a small incision which is advanced to the inferior edge of the superior lamina. A small incision is then made that extends either cranially or caudally. A calnulatedcannulated dilator is then inserted over the guidewire. Larger diameter cannulated dilators are sequentially inserted over each other to increase the opening into the body cavity. Typically the guide wire is removed after the first cannulated dilators installed and eventually the cannulated dilators are all removed after the, tubular retractor has been inserted over the largest of the cannulated dilators. Once these procedures are accomplished, the tubular retractor is locked into position by a retractor clamp that is clamped to a retractor clamping arm which is fixed to a rigid member such as the operating table. This provides an unencumbered zone where the surgeon can perform the medical procedure that was intended to be performed.
As is well known in this field of technology, the cannulated dilators and tubular retractors are made from surgical metal material and are sized for the largest depth that is anticipated in the surgical procedure. Hence, whether the depth is 10 millimeters (mm), 20 mm, 30 mm, etc. Measured from the exterior of the cavity to the most interior position in the cavity (inferior edge of the superior lamina) the tubular retractor that may be available for use iiin the surgical procedure could be 100 mm or larger. The additional or excess length of the dilator retractor is not only cumbersome to use, it is unnecessary and undesirable.
This invention obviates this problem by providing the necessary elements that allow the dilator retractor (cannula) to be cut to size once the incision and diameter of the cavity has been established. Hence, in the surgical procedure described above the last cannulated dilator in the procedure in accordance with this invention includes indicia of a graduated vertical scale on the tubular wall, preferably in millimeters that is viewed by the user. A cannula or dilator retractor, which basically is a cylindrical tube made from a plastic or synthetic material in one preferred embodiment or surgical metal in another embodiment which is easy to cut and which is transparent in one embodiment and opaque in another is provided in the largest length contemplated in this particular procedure or alternatively is pro-sized in a series of sized cannulas. A template that has a diameter that is slightly smaller than the diameter of the dilator retractor made from a soft plastic material such as Teflon material that may include graduated annular grooves that are graduated vertically in scale that is commensurate with the indicia scale on the cannulated dilator. Or alternatively, the dilator retractor may also include on the wall indicia corresponding to the indicia on the cannulated dilator. Hence, the surgeon or user merely has to count the annular grooves or the indicia on the wall of the dilator retractor to match the depth of the cavity and with a cutter, cut through the delator retractor which will provide a cannula that is acceptable to the surgeon without the unnecessary length that has heretofore presented a problem.
An annular retractor clamp is provided to fit over the top of the dilator retractor which obviously is sized to accommodate the width of the retractor clamp which, in turn, is utilized to mate with a rigid holder that is clamped to a rigid member such as the operating table or other convenient member to secure the cannula in place.
This invention also contemplates a tool for insertion of the cannulated dilator and a tool for the insertion of the dilator retractor into the body cavity. The tool for insertion of the cannulated dilator is a rectangular shaped planar member that removably fits the cannulated dilator and serves to provide leverage for the surgeon to turn the dilator retractor while it is being inserted into the body cavity to reach its ultimate destination. A tool for insertion of the dilator retractor is generally a pusher which may be made integral with the template includes an inner bore that is slightly larger than the outer diameter of the cannulated dilator and includes a flat bottom surface that overlies the top end wall surface of the dilator retractor so that the pusher provides leverage for the surgeon to slide the dilator retractor over the scaled cannulated dilator until it reaches the final destination in the body cavity.
As an alternate to the use of the cutter and template, it is contemplated within the scope of this invention, that a series of different length dilator retractors will be made available so that the surgeon after making the measurement of the depth of body cavity with the cannulated dilator will select the dilator retractor that most closely matches the size desired.
An object of this invention is to provide a dilator retractor that is sized to fit the patient for use in a surgical procedure.
A feature of this invention is to provide indicia of a vertical scale on the cannulated dilator to ascertain the depth of the cavity in the body in which a medical procedure is to be performed. In one embodiment a template made from a relatively soft plastic material fits into the dilator retractor having a scale commensurate with the scale on the cannulated dilator for supporting the dilator retractor as it is cut to the desired length. In another embodiment the dilator retractor includes indicia on the outer surface that correlates to the indicia on the cannulated dilator. In one embodiment the dilator retractor is transparent, in another embodiment it is opaque, and it can be made from either plastic or metallic material when in the opaque embodiments.
Another feature of this invention is the provision of a tool that is adapted to fit the cannulated dilator to allow the surgeon to turn the cannulated dilator as the surgeon pushes the cannulated dilator into the body cavity against the resistance of the body tissue. In one embodiment the tool includes concentric bores that define a shoulder that engages the end of the cannulated dilator and recesses that engage tabs axially extending from the proximate end of the cannulated dilator.
An alternative to the cutting procedure is the provision of predetermined different length dilator retractors that permit the surgeon to select the desire length commensurate with the depth of the body cavity.
Another feature of this invention is an annular retractor clamp that is slidable over the outer surface of the dilator retractor that is locked into place and adaptable to fit onto a flexible arm that is rigidly connected to a static structure such as the operating table.
The foregoing and other features of the present invention will become more apparent from the following description and accompanying drawings.
While in the preferred embodiment this invention is being described in connection with a particular surgical procedure, namely, a lumbar disectomy, it is to be understood that this invention has utility in other types of procedures and as one skilled in this art can appreciate, the invention has particular utility where it is desirable to provide a length of the cannula that is commensurate with the depth of the body cavity. As used in this patent application the term “cannulated dilator” means a surgical instrument that is utilized to widen the body cavity and the term “dilator retractor” is a cannula intended to fit into the body cavity. As used throughout this disclosure the term “body cavity” unless indicated otherwise refers to an access hole formed in the body of the patient in order to reach the target where the medical procedure is being performed and the term cannula or dilator retractor serves to define a working cavity or chamber that the surgeon uses to perform a medical procedure. While in the preferred embodiment, it is preferred that the dilator retractor is made from a plastic material and is transparent as will be appreciated and as will be described herein below this invention contemplates a dilator retractor made from metallic material and in certain embodiments the material is opaque.
To best understand this invention reference is being made to
In accordance with this invention, indica 26 is placed on the exterior of the body 18 and is a graduated scale in millimeters (although any other unit of measurement can be utilized) that serves to indicate the depth of the body cavity and is used to determine the length of the dilator retractor 14 as will be described in more detail herein below. The dilator retractor 14 in one embodiment is made from a plastic material that is transparent and is sufficiently strong that exhibits hoop integrity that is capable of withstanding the forces of the tissue tending to exert a lateral force. This provides a relatively inexpensive member that is capable of being cut while the patient is in the operating room. In one embodiment the dilator retractor is fitted onto the fixture—and the fixture includes spaced grooves that are correlated to the measurement of the depth of the body cavity that is determined by the indicia of the cannulated dilator 10.
As mentioned above, once the depth of the body cavity as measured by the indicia on the cannulated dilator 10, the dilator retractor 14 is fitted on the scaled end of the template portion 30 which includes a series of annular grooves that are axially spaced a predetermined distance, say at 10 mm, so that the dilator retractor 14 being transparent in this instance, once fitted onto the template can be sized. Hence, the user merely counts the number of grooves that is commensurate with the measurement taken from the indicia of the cannulated dilator and the desired length is then cut to the desired length. Obviously, it is important that the dilator retractor 14 is initially oversized so that the length will be longer than any of the depths of the body cavity contemplated. Hence, in this manner the cannula is made to fit each individual patient. The technique for making the measurement and cutting to size is described as follows. If the depth of the body cavity measurement taken from the cannulated dilator was 30 mm the user would count 3 annular grooves which are spaced 10 mm apart to determine the length of the dilator retractor desired and would add an addition amount to compensate for the attachment dimension of the annular retractor clamp 1816. Hence, if the width of the clamp 1816 is 10 mm and the depth of cavity is 30 mm, the user would select 40 mm as the juncture where the dilator retractor is cut to size.
Once the length of the depth of the body cavity as calculated by the cannulated dilator 10 is determined and while the dilator retractor 14 is mounted on the fixture portion 30, and after the user determines the number of annular grooves on the fixture portion that will match the depth of the body cavity as measured by the indicia on the cumulated dilator and the amount necessary to hold the retractor clamp 1816, the user with the use of the commercially available cutters 34 snips off the end of the retractor dilator 14. The fixture will also be cut and this system for cutting assures that the dilator retractor 14 will have a clean, smooth cut. A suitable cutter 34 is one that is available in many hardware stores such as Home Depot and is under the name “Orbit”. This cutter was tested and has proven to work satisfactory. However, any type of cutter is contemplated for use with this invention, such as commercially available knives and pipe cutters, being other examples.
Once the dilator retractor 14 has been cut to size the dilator retractor 14 is then fitted over the cannula dilator 10 and is forced into the body cavity with a suitable pusher tool of the type shown in
Also in accordance with this invention the end clamp 16 comprises an annular body 46 being split at 47 and including a threaded lateral bore that accommodates the tightening screw 50. The central opening is dimensioned to fit over the end of the dilator retractor 14 and slide thereon. Once in position the screw is tightened to secure the clamp to the dilator retractor 14. A bracket 56 having a bifurcated slot 58 serves to engage a flexible arm that is clamped to a rigid member. This serves to support the dilator retractor 14 while the surgeon is performing the surgical procedure.
The cannulated retractor tool 39 is a relatively rectangular flat member 41 having a central bore 43 that is made from two spaced diameters. The most inner diameter on the bottom face of the tool 39 is slightly larger than the outer diameter of the cannula dilator 10 and the outer diameter on the top face of the tool 39 is equivalent to the inner diameter of the cannulated dilator 10 to provide a shoulder for bearing on the annular top surface 45 of the cannulated dilator 10. A pair of concentrically spaced recesses 49 are formed in the top surface extending through the upper portion of tool 40 to accommodate and complement the tabs 22. Thus tool 39 serves to provide a leverage tool that helps the surgeon for forcing the cannulated dilator 10 into the body cavity and against the resistance created by the body tissue adjacent thereto.
What has been described by this invention is a cannula that is sized to fit the individual patient. A cannulated dilator includes indicia of a scale for measuring the depth of the individual patient. With that measurement, the cannula in one embodiment may be made from a plastic, transparent material fits onto a fixture that is cuttable and contains a visible predetermined scale to cut the cannula to the particular length. In another embodiment the cannula includes indicia of a scale corresponding to the scale on the cannulated dilator and is similarly cut. The invention teaches a tool is provided to insert the cannulated dilator into the cavity and another tool to insert the cannula into the body cavity. In another embodiment a series of pre-sized cannulas are provided so that the user can select from this series the size that corresponds to the measurement obtained with the cannulated dilator.
Although this invention has been shown and described with respect to detailed embodiments thereof, it will be appreciated and understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and detail thereof may be made without departing from the spirit and scope of the claimed invention.
More than one reissue application has been filed for the reissue of U.S. Pat. No. 6,159,179. The other reissue application is Reissue application Ser. No. 10/165,991 filed on Jun. 10, 2002. This application is a continuation reissue of U.S. application Ser. No. 10/165,991, now U.S. Pat. No. Re. 42,525.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
569839 | Roeloffs | Oct 1896 | A |
1633703 | Kaji | Jun 1927 | A |
2922420 | Cheng | Jan 1960 | A |
3470872 | Grieshaber | Oct 1969 | A |
3875595 | Froning | Apr 1975 | A |
4232660 | Coles | Nov 1980 | A |
4440168 | Warren | Apr 1984 | A |
4449532 | Storz | May 1984 | A |
4481947 | Chester | Nov 1984 | A |
4545374 | Jacobson | Oct 1985 | A |
4573448 | Kambin | Mar 1986 | A |
4617922 | Griggs | Oct 1986 | A |
4620460 | Gonzales, Jr. | Nov 1986 | A |
4686972 | Kurland | Aug 1987 | A |
4736738 | Lipovsek et al. | Apr 1988 | A |
4747394 | Watanabe | May 1988 | A |
4798111 | Cheeseman | Jan 1989 | A |
4803976 | Frigg et al. | Feb 1989 | A |
4808157 | Coombs | Feb 1989 | A |
4817587 | Janese | Apr 1989 | A |
4862891 | Smith | Sep 1989 | A |
4863423 | Wallace | Sep 1989 | A |
4872451 | Moore et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
4882958 | McNeeley | Nov 1989 | A |
4952214 | Comparetto | Aug 1990 | A |
4969888 | Scholten et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
5035232 | Lutze et al. | Jul 1991 | A |
5048379 | Gramera et al. | Sep 1991 | A |
5052373 | Michelson | Oct 1991 | A |
5084043 | Hertzmann et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5098435 | Stednitz et al. | Mar 1992 | A |
5106376 | Mononen et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5133720 | Greenberg | Jul 1992 | A |
5135525 | Biscoping et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5148724 | Rexford | Sep 1992 | A |
5158543 | Lazarus | Oct 1992 | A |
5171279 | Mathews | Dec 1992 | A |
5195541 | Obenchain | Mar 1993 | A |
5242443 | Kambin | Sep 1993 | A |
5275611 | Behl | Jan 1994 | A |
5279567 | Ciaglia et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
5292309 | Van Tassel et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5303694 | Mikhail | Apr 1994 | A |
5312360 | Behl | May 1994 | A |
5342384 | Sugarbaker | Aug 1994 | A |
5356413 | Martins et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
5363841 | Coker | Nov 1994 | A |
5403264 | Wohlers et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5431639 | Shaw | Jul 1995 | A |
5431651 | Goble | Jul 1995 | A |
D361381 | Koros et al. | Aug 1995 | S |
5439464 | Shapiro | Aug 1995 | A |
5472426 | Bonati et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5489274 | Chu et al. | Feb 1996 | A |
5512038 | O'Neal et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5562677 | Hildwein et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5569248 | Mathews | Oct 1996 | A |
5601550 | Esser | Feb 1997 | A |
5611778 | Brinon | Mar 1997 | A |
5687739 | McPherson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5716415 | Steffee | Feb 1998 | A |
5728097 | Mathews | Mar 1998 | A |
5743853 | Lauderdale | Apr 1998 | A |
5746720 | Stouder, Jr. | May 1998 | A |
5766221 | Benderev et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5792044 | Foley et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
D399955 | Koros et al. | Oct 1998 | S |
5816257 | Chin | Oct 1998 | A |
RE36020 | Moore et al. | Dec 1998 | E |
5851207 | Cesarone | Dec 1998 | A |
5882344 | Stouder, Jr. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885299 | Winslow et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5885300 | Tokuhashi et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5891147 | Moskovitz et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5895352 | Kleiner | Apr 1999 | A |
5895390 | Moran et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5897593 | Kohrs et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5899901 | Middleton | May 1999 | A |
5902231 | Foley et al. | May 1999 | A |
5913818 | Co et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5928139 | Koros et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
5944658 | Koros et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5954635 | Foley et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5954671 | O'Neill | Sep 1999 | A |
5967970 | Cowan et al. | Oct 1999 | A |
5971920 | Nagel | Oct 1999 | A |
5976146 | Ogawa et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
5996447 | Bayouth | Dec 1999 | A |
6004322 | Bernstein | Dec 1999 | A |
6007487 | Foley et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6010520 | Pattison | Jan 2000 | A |
6033406 | Mathews | Mar 2000 | A |
6063088 | Winslow | May 2000 | A |
6080155 | Michelson | Jun 2000 | A |
6081741 | Hollis | Jun 2000 | A |
6083225 | Winslow et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6113602 | Sand | Sep 2000 | A |
6120434 | Kimura et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6120506 | Kohrs et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
D433296 | Yamakawa | Nov 2000 | S |
6152871 | Foley et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6156006 | Brosens | Dec 2000 | A |
6159179 | Simonson | Dec 2000 | A |
6162170 | Foley et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6162236 | Osada | Dec 2000 | A |
D436513 | Yamakawa | Jan 2001 | S |
6176823 | Foley et al. | Jan 2001 | B1 |
D438074 | Marr et al. | Feb 2001 | S |
6197002 | Peterson | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206822 | Foley et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206826 | Mathews et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6206885 | Ghahremani et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6214004 | Coker | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6217509 | Foley et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
6224597 | Coker | May 2001 | B1 |
6224608 | Ciccolella et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6241734 | Scribner et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6245072 | Zdeblick et al. | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6258097 | Cook et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6267763 | Castro | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6270498 | Michelson | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6273896 | Franck et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6283966 | Houfburg | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6287313 | Sasso | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6296609 | Brau | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6312432 | Leppelmeier | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6342057 | Brace et al. | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6348058 | Melkent et al. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
6354176 | Nordlin | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6371959 | Trice | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6371968 | Kogasaka et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6395007 | Bhatnagar et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6418821 | Yamakawa | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6428472 | Haas | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6461330 | Miyagi | Oct 2002 | B1 |
D466766 | Marty et al. | Dec 2002 | S |
6520907 | Foley et al. | Feb 2003 | B1 |
6524238 | Velikaris et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
6530926 | Davison | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6530929 | Justis et al. | Mar 2003 | B1 |
6540756 | Vaughan | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6558386 | Cragg | May 2003 | B1 |
6607530 | Carl et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6692434 | Ritland | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6793656 | Mathews | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6916330 | Simonson | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6921403 | Cragg et al. | Jul 2005 | B2 |
6929606 | Ritland | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7008424 | Teitelbaum | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7008431 | Simonson | Mar 2006 | B2 |
7435219 | Kim | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7476240 | Raymond et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7588588 | Spitler et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7648506 | McCord et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7648507 | Techiera et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7824410 | Simonson et al. | Nov 2010 | B2 |
RE42525 | Simonson | Jul 2011 | E |
8192437 | Simonson | Jun 2012 | B2 |
8235999 | Simonson | Aug 2012 | B2 |
8361151 | Simonson | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8444678 | Simonson et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8556905 | Simonson | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20010012942 | Estes et al. | Aug 2001 | A1 |
20010027320 | Sasso | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20020011135 | Hall | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020016592 | Branch et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020022764 | Smith et al. | Feb 2002 | A1 |
20020045904 | Fuss et al. | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020049368 | Ritland | Apr 2002 | A1 |
20020058948 | Arlettaz | May 2002 | A1 |
20020077632 | Tsou | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020082695 | Neumann | Jun 2002 | A1 |
20020088695 | Migimatsu et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020123668 | Ritland | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020143235 | Pagliuca | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020161368 | Foley et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20030083688 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030083689 | Simonson | May 2003 | A1 |
20030187431 | Simonson | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030220689 | Ritland | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030236447 | Ritland | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040106997 | Lieberson | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050004593 | Simonson | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050080418 | Simonson et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050085813 | Spitler et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050131421 | Anderson et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050136085 | Bellamy | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050137461 | Marchek et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20050203490 | Simonson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050216002 | Simonson | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20070134175 | Bellamy | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20100222824 | Simonson | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20110040333 | Simonson et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20130184533 | Simonson | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20140051931 | Simonson | Feb 2014 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO-0018306 | Apr 2000 | WO |
WO-02060330 | Aug 2002 | WO |
Entry |
---|
U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707, Simonson. |
Advisory Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Mar. 29, 2006. |
Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Feb. 5, 2005. |
Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Jul. 5, 2005. |
Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Mar. 13, 2006. |
Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Nov. 16, 2005. |
Appeal Brief in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated May 31, 2006. |
Barone, “An Improved Retractor for the Anterior Apporach in the Surgical Management of Vertebral Fractures,” Am J Orthop, 1998, pp. 703-704, vol. 27(10). |
Board of Patent Appeals and Interferences Decision in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Dec. 2, 2010. |
Examiner's Answer in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Dec. 13, 2006. |
Frank, “Endoscopic Dural Retractor for Spinal Stenosis Surgery,” Minim Invasive Neurosurg, 2002, pp. 136-138, vol. 45(3). |
Hilton, Donald et al, “Medtronic Sofamor Danek METRX Microdiscectomy Surgical Technique Brochure”, 2001. |
Hsu, Ken et al, “Internal Fixation with Pedicle Screws,” Lumbar Spine Surgery, Techniques and Complications, The C. V. Mosby Company pp. 322-338 (1987). |
Kambin, Parvis and Schaffer, Johnathan, “Arthroscopic Fusion of the Lumbosacral Spine,” Lumbosacral and Spinopelvic Fixation, ch 44, pp. 565-577 (1996). |
Kambin, Parvis, “Arthroscopic Lumbar Intervertebral Fusion,” The Adult Spine: Principles and Practice, ch. 95, pp. 2037-2046 (1997). |
Kambin, Parvis, “Arthroscopic Techniques for Spinal Surgery,” Operative Arthroscopy, ch 89, pp. 1215-1225 (1996). |
Kambin, Parviz, “Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy: Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery”, National Library of Medicine, 1991, p. 67-100, Urban & Schwarzenberg. |
Kambin, Parviz, “Posterolateral Percutaneous Lumbar Interbody Fusion”, Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy: Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery, pp. 117-121 (1991). |
Leu, Hans-Jorg and Schreiber, Adam, “La Nucleotomie Percutanee Avec Discoscopie: Experiences Depuis 1979 Et Possibilities Actuelles,” Revue Medicale De La Suisse Romande, vol. 109, pp. 477-482 (1989). |
Leu, Hans-Jorg and Schreiber, Adam, “Percutaneous Lumbar Restabilization,” Arthroscopic Microdiscectomy: Minimal Intervention in Spinal Surgery, pp. 123-125 (1990). |
Leu, Hansjoerg Franz et al, “Lumber Percutaneous Endoscopic Interbody Fusion,” Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 337, pp. 58-63 (1997). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Aug. 16, 2005. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Dec. 8, 2004. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Feb. 7, 2006. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Mar. 31, 2005. |
Ozer, “A New Retractor For The Anterior Cervical Approach,” Br J Neurosurg, 1994, pp. 469-470, vol. 8(4). |
Reply Brief in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Feb. 7, 2007. |
Savitz, Martin, “Same-Day Microsurgical Arthroscopic Latera-Approach Laser-Assisted (SMALL) Fluoroscopic Discectomy”, Journal of Neurosurgery, Jun. 1994, pp. 1039-1045. |
Schaffer, Johnathan et al, “Percutaneous Posterolateral Lumbar Discectomy and decompression with a 6.9 Millimeter Cannula”, The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery, 1991, pp. 822-831. |
Schetrumpf, Jr., “Combined Retractor and Sucker with Built-in Clearing Device for Spinal Surgery,” Injury, 1973, pp. 352-353, vol. 4(4). |
Schreiber, et al., “Does Percutaneous Nucleotomy with Discoscopy Replace Conventional Discectomy?”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, No. 238, Jan. 1989. |
Sofamor Danek, “MED MicroEndoscopic Discectomy System” (1997). |
Styf, “The Effects of External Compression by Three Different Retractors on Pressure in the Erector Spine Muscles During and After Posterior Lumbar Spine Surgery in Humans,” Spine, 1998, pp. 354-358, vol. 23(3), Lippincott-Raven Publishers. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707, filed Jul. 26, 2004, Robert E. Simonson. |
U.S. Appl. No. 10/165,991, filed Jun. 10, 2002, Robert E. Simonson. |
Web page, http:/brainlab.com, Apr. 2, 2002. |
Wiltse, “New Uses and Refinements of the Paraspinal Approach to the Lumbar Spine”, Spine, vol. 13 No. 6 1988, pp. 696-706. |
Wolfhard Caspar, Technique of Microsurgery, in Microsugery of the Lumbar Spine: Principles and Techniques in Spine Surgery 105-122 (Aspen Publications, 1990). |
Amendment in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Dec. 2, 2011. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Dec. 14, 2011. |
Kambin, Parviz, “Percutaneous Posterolateral Discectomy”, Clinical Orthopaedics and Related Research, Section II, pp. 145-154 (1986). |
Sofamor Danek Video Systems Brochure, 10 pages (1994). |
Examiner's Answer in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated May 10, 2012. |
Patent Trial and Appeal Board Decision in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Dec. 4, 2012. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Mar. 14, 2013. (11 pages). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Oct. 7, 2013. |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 10/899,707 dated Mar. 20, 2014 (14 Pages). |
Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 14/026,536 dated Jan. 15, 2014 (6 Pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 10165991 | Jun 2002 | US |
Child | 09266984 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09266984 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 12971929 | US | |
Parent | 09266984 | Mar 1999 | US |
Child | 10165991 | US |