Patent Application
20130228247
This valve design represents a low cost solution for applications in present process control. It requires no bonnet openings and other leak-prone valve openings other than for a rotating shaft passage.
Similar butterfly valves, such as represented by U.S. Pat. No. 6,216,737 B1, require two separate vanes of conventional shape, connected by an external linkage drive. These valves are cumbersome and expensive. Each vane has a diverse flow characteristic due to their diverse locations on a pipe tee.
My invention does not require such complex shapes and can make-do with one single vane able to control flow through two separate ports at the same time. Other three-way designs are in the shape of a plug valve as exemplified by U.S. Pat. No. 3,721,265. This valve experiences rubbing friction when the plug is rotated., Such friction is absent in my invention. Furthermore, the flow passages are very restricted limiting flow.
Yet, another prior art device is shown in U.S. Pat. No. 3,592,221. While this device constitutes a rotary three-way valve, it can only switch from one port to the other and is not able to modulate the rate of two flows simultaneously, as is the purpose and function of my device.
In addition, there is a three-way butterfly valve shown in U.S. Pat. No. 4,273,157. Here is a vane, while seating at an angle, is not able to rotate 90 degrees and shut off two separate, but identical, ports. Port 26 is a small by-pass opening and is only closed, when vane 17 has nearly fully opened seat 27. It does not teach the modulation and control of fluid from and to identical ports.
Finally, there is U.S. Pat. No. 5,193,572, showing a single, rotatable vane in a three- way housing configuration. Here, the single vane 30 is meant to evacuate fluid from a horizontal pipe 50. No three-way control functions are implied..
My invention overcomes all these disadvantages by providing a simple, low weight, and low cost solution to three-way modulating process applications. Here, a single vane is able to either modulate between, or, shut off two identical ports, rotating the vane from one closed position at 45 degrees from the vertical to another 45 degrees position after traveling 90 degrees. It can do this by having two 90 degree opposed seating surfaces.
Furthermore, my vane is concave to gently bend fluid into, or out of, the third, vertical, port. This significantly increases the flow capacity of my valve. The outside of the vane is convex and it hugs the interior bore of the housing. Thereby preventing un-authorized fluid to by-pass the uncontrolled upper portion of the vane.
Finally, there is no contact between vane and housing, other than in the closed position. This means absence of rotating friction (other than in the shaft bearings), a great feature, when used for automatic control purposes.
These, and other advantages of my invention will become more clear, when viewing the accompanying drawing and the following description.
A shaft 8 located perpendicular to and at the intersection of bores 4 and 18. A rotatable vane 6 is mounted on said shaft and having a plenary oval surface 73 having a circular periphery 10, being slanted 45 degrees on either side of the oval surface (α=90 degrees). The slanted surfaces are capable of interfacing closely with the interior surfaces of bore 4 at an angle γ of about 45 degrees.
The plenary surface 7 has a bulging indentation 12, whose outer radius closely matches the radius of bore 4. Ring-shaped supports 16 help to secure the shaft against the vane with the assistance of a pin 19. Shaft 8 furthermore penetrates housing 1 through a suitable opening 20.
While
The unique feature of the invention is, that contrary to state of the art devices, the same configuration can be utilized for either diverting or mixing service. While in the diverting mode, flow entering opening C can be diverted either to opening A, or opening B. In a mixing mode, different fluids entering openings A and B can be mixed at any desired ratio before leaving opening C.
While the invention has been shown in a preferred configuration, numerous modification may be made without departing from the scope of the following claims. For example, housing 1 may connect to piping using threaded ends rather than flanges. Furthermore, my vane can be designed for an operating travel of 60 degrees, instead of the preferred 90 degrees. In that case, angle y becomes 60 degrees instead of 45 degrees and angle a becomes 60 degrees, instead of 90 degrees.
