The present invention relates to a cap including a check valve and a delaminatable container including the cap.
Conventionally, delaminatable containers are known that include a container body having an outer shell and an inner bag, the inner bag to be shrunk with a decrease in contents. Such a delaminatable container is usually provided with a cap having a check valve as described in PTL 1 and is configured to open the check valve and discharge the contents by squeezing the container body and close the check valve by stopping squeezing.
PTL 1: JP 2013-241197A
However, the cap in PTL 1 has a risk of degradation of usability due to discharge of more than an expected amount of the contents or occurrence of more than estimated pulsation of the contents depending on the degree of squeezing.
The present invention has been made in view of such circumstances and is to provide a cap with improved usability.
The present invention provides a cap comprising a cap body to be fitted to a mouth of a container, wherein the cap is configured to include: a valve seat having a flow aperture; a valve body to be separated from or seated on the valve seat so as to open and close the flow aperture; and a biasing member to bias the valve body in a seating direction, and configured to increase a flow area in which contents flow with an increase in a displacement of the valve body, and the cap further includes a displacement restricting section to restrict the displacement of the valve body.
The present inventor made an intensive review to find that such a cap as in PTL 1 has a structure to increase the flow area in which the contents flow with an increase in the displacement of the valve body of the check valve, and when the container body is squeezed too strong, the valve body is opened widely to discharge more than an expected amount of the contents or to create more than estimated pulsation of the contents as a result of closing the valve body in reaction to wide opening, causing degradation of usability and thus has come to complete the present invention of restricting the displacement of the valve body.
Various embodiments of the present invention are described below as examples. The embodiments described below may be combined with each other.
Preferably, the displacement restricting section restricts the displacement of the valve body to be 0.8 times or less a diameter of the flow aperture.
Preferably, the displacement restricting section restricts the displacement of the valve body to 1.5 mm or less.
Preferably, the displacement restricting section restricts the displacement of the valve body from 0.4 to 0.8 mm.
Preferably, the biasing member is formed of a plurality of elastic pieces radially extending from an outer circumferential portion of the valve body.
Preferably, the cap body includes: an inner tube section having the valve seat; and a discharge portion mounted to the inner tube section and having an outlet, the inner tube section and the discharge portion forming an intermediate space, and the cap is configured to displace the valve body in the intermediate space.
Preferably, the displacement restricting section is formed of a plurality of projections formed on a surface on a side of the intermediate space of the discharge portion.
Preferably, the displacement restricting section is formed of a spacer disposed between the discharge portion and the check valve.
The present invention also provides a delaminatable container including a container body having an outer shell and an inner bag, the inner bag to be shrunk with a decrease in the contents, wherein the cap of any of the above configurations is fitted to a mouth of the container body.
Embodiments of the present invention are described below. Various characteristics in the embodiments described below may be combined with each other. Each characteristic is independently inventive.
As illustrated in
As illustrated in
The valve member 5 is, as illustrated in
The valve member 5 in any of the above configurations is configured to allow compression of the inner bag 14 by closing the fresh air inlet 15 when the outer shell 12 is compressed to introduce fresh air into the space G when the compressive force to the outer shell 12 is released.
The storage portion 7 is covered with a shrink film after the valve member 5 is mounted. At this point, to avoid interference of the valve member 5 with the shrink film, the valve member 5 is mounted to a valve member mounting recess 7a provided in the. In addition, not to tightly close the valve member mounting recess 7a with the shrink film, an air circulation groove 7b is provided that extends in the direction from the valve member mounting recess 7a to the mouth 9 (refer to
Regarding the layer structure of the container body 3, the outer layer 11 is formed thicker than the inner layer 13 so as to increase the restorability thereof. The outer layer 11 is formed of, for example, low-density polyethylene, linear low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, or a mixture thereof, or the like. The outer layer 11 may have a multilayer structure. The inner layer 13 preferably has a multilayer structure. Examples of the layer in contact with the outer layer 11 include an EVOH layer 13a of an ethylene-vinyl alcohol copolymer (EVOH) resin, and examples of the layer in contact with the contents include an inner surface layer 13b of polyolefin, such as low-density polyethylene, linear low-density polyethylene, high-density polyethylene, polypropylene, an ethylene-propylene copolymer, and a mixture thereof. The adhesion layer 13c is preferably used between the EVOH layer and the inner surface layer.
Then, referring to
The main cap member 24 is configured with a cylindrical outer tube section 24o, a cylindrical inner tube section 24i concentrically disposed inside the outer tube section 24o, and an annular portion 24r connecting upper ends of the outer tube section 24o and the inner tube section 24i with each other. The outer tube section 24o has a lower inner circumferential surface having the engaged section 24e formed to be engaged with the engagement section 9e of the mouth 9. The inner tube section 24i has a lower inner circumferential surface, where an annular valve seat 24s is formed that extends diagonally above toward the radial center and has a flow aperture 24h at the center. The valve seat 24s has an inner circumferential surface 24s1 in a tapered shape inclined above. The inner tube section 24i has an upper inner circumferential surface, where a fitting recess 24f is formed over the entire circumference.
The check valve 25 is, as illustrated in
The discharge member 26 is provided with, as illustrated in
In addition, the discharge member 26 in the present embodiment is provided with, as illustrated in
Then, operations of the cap 2 according to the present embodiment are described.
For discharging the contents, the cap cover 22 is opened to expose the discharge member 26, the container body 3 is tilted to direct the tubular guide section 26g below, and the storage portion 7 of the container body 3 is squeezed. The valve body 25b is lifted from the valve seat 24s due to pressure rise in the storage portion 7 (inner bag 14), causing opening of the check valve 25 to discharge the contents in the storage portion 7 through the flow aperture 24h and the intermediate space S from the outlet 26m.
Then, after a required amount of the contents is discharged, the container body 3 is returned to an upright position and the squeezing of the storage portion 7 is stopped, thereby reducing the internal pressure of the storage portion 7 and closing the check valve 25 due to the biasing force of the elastic pieces 25p. Accordingly, an incoming flow of fresh air from the flow aperture 24h into the storage portion 7 (inner bag 14) is prevented, and fresh air thus does not enter the inner bag 14 to inhibit content degradation.
When a sudden force happens to be applied without realizing how strong it should be for discharging the contents by squeezing the storage portion 7 of the container body 3, the valve body 25b sometimes moves a lot to discharge more than an expected amount of the contents. There is another problem that squeezing with a weaker force after applying a sudden force causes sudden closing of the valve body 25b in reaction to wide opening the valve body 25b due to the biasing force of the elastic pieces 25p and repeating this cycle creates pulsation that results in degradation of usability. However, the cap 2 in the present embodiment has the discharge member 26 provided with the projections 26p to restrict the maximum displacement of the valve body 25b to the predetermined amount described above, thereby preventing opening of the valve body 25b more than necessary to allow improving the usability. In the present embodiment, the projections 26p are integrally formed with the discharge member 26 as a single piece and thus the displacement restricting section is readily configured only by changing the die shape of the discharge member without incorporating another member.
The present invention is allowed to be carried out in the following embodiments.
Although the projections 26p formed in the discharge member 26 are used as the displacement restricting section to restrict the displacement of the valve body 25b in the above embodiment, the displacement restricting section is not limited to such a configuration. For example, as illustrated in
In addition, as the displacement restricting section to restrict the displacement of the valve body 25b, projection(s) formed on a surface on the discharge member 26 side of the valve body 25b may be used. In this case, the projection on the valve body 25b side abuts on the surface on the intermediate space S side of the discharge member 26 to restrict the displacement of the valve body 25b itself.
The cap 2 of the present invention may be used for containers other than the delaminatable container 1, for example, a monolayer container in which the entire container is shrunk with discharge of the contents.
The present invention is described below further in detail using Test Examples. The present invention is, however, not at all limited to Test Examples below. In the following tests, the cap 2 had the outlet 26m with a diameter of 4.0 mm, the flow aperture 24h (valve body 25b) with a diameter of 8.0 mm. The contents were a liquid (soy sauce), and the container body 3 had a volume of 360 ml. In the tests, 11 test subjects performed discharge of the contents (liquid) in the container body 3 twice per subject and evaluated Samples having displacement restricting section (projections 26p) that caused the valve bodies 25b to have the four maximum displacements below and Comparative Example having no displacement restricting section from three perspectives of “whether the contents were discharged in an intended position”, “whether the contents were discharged in a satisfactory manner”, and “whether the contents were discharged in an appropriate amount”. The evaluation was made in five grades (from 1 as poor to 5 as good).
Table 1 shows results of the above tests. Each value in Table 1 was obtained by rounding off an average of the evaluations by the 11 subjects to the first decimal place. As shown in Table 1, from any of the three perspectives, the scores get better with each increase in displacement within the maximum displacement ranging from 0.4 mm to 0.6 mm and the scores for 0.7 mm are somewhat worse than those for 0.6 mm. In comparison with Comparative Example, only for the maximum displacement of 0.4 mm, the results were worse than Comparative Example and the users felt discomfort. This is considered because the amount of discharge was not as much as expected relative to the degree of squeezing. The above findings indicate that the maximum displacement of the valve body 25b is preferably from 0.4 to 0.8 mm, more preferably from 0.5 to 0.7 mm, and even more preferably from 0.55 to 0.65 mm. Similarly, the maximum displacement of the valve body 25b is preferably from 0.05 times to 0.1 times the diameter of the flow aperture 24h, more preferably from 0.06 times to 0.09 times, and even more preferably from 0.07 times to 0.08 times.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
JP2017-014537 | Jan 2017 | JP | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/JP2018/002523 | 1/26/2018 | WO | 00 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2018/139591 | 8/2/2018 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2128035 | Boetel | Aug 1938 | A |
4635826 | Hatakeyama | Jan 1987 | A |
4785978 | Kano | Nov 1988 | A |
5275312 | Labruzzo | Jan 1994 | A |
5813576 | Iizuka | Sep 1998 | A |
20030085240 | Dark | May 2003 | A1 |
20030230596 | Masuda | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040007601 | Masuda | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040050872 | Masuda | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040112920 | Felten | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040134940 | Hearld | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20040144809 | Kerman | Jul 2004 | A1 |
20050129455 | Avalle | Jun 2005 | A1 |
20120211530 | Bloom | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120305607 | Geiger | Dec 2012 | A1 |
20140144938 | Kakuta | May 2014 | A1 |
20140209644 | Socier | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20150353245 | Sakimura | Dec 2015 | A1 |
20170107024 | Tamarindo | Apr 2017 | A1 |
20180370673 | Taruno | Dec 2018 | A1 |
20190291930 | Sakimura | Sep 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2004-067099 | Mar 2004 | JP |
2012-192975 | Oct 2012 | JP |
2013-241197 | Dec 2013 | JP |
2016-084180 | May 2016 | JP |
5963323 | Aug 2016 | JP |
9221569 | Dec 1992 | WO |
2015173979 | Nov 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Translation of International Search Report dated Apr. 10, 2018 in corresponding International Application No. PCT/JP2018/002523; 5 pages. |
Extended European Search Report dated Jan. 28, 2020, in corresponding European patent application No. 18744266.0; 7 pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20190375561 A1 | Dec 2019 | US |