The present invention relates to telecommunications and, more particularly, to a method and apparatus for canceling the effect of a transformer blocking capacitor on impedance in an interface circuit.
One of the standards with which the service provider 12 should comply is the Telcordia Standard TR-NWT-000057 (referred to herein as the “Telcordia Standard”), which specifies the impedance level a telecommunication device at the subscriber 10 should encounter when a connection is established with the service provider 12. According to the Telcordia Standard, this impedance level is 900 Ω+2.16 μF as viewed by the subscriber 10 between the tip line 16 and ring line 18 (referred to herein as the tip/ring lines 20). Telecommunication devices for use at the subscriber 10 are designed based on the impedance level set forth in the Telcordia Standard and, therefore, if the impedance of the tip/ring lines 20 deviates from this standard, telephone service may be affected adversely.
In traditional audio only telephone service arrangements (i.e., plain old telephone service, “POTS”), a subscriber line interface card (SLIC) 22 and a coder/decoder (CODEC) 24 generate a suitable impedance level between the tip/ring lines 20. The CODEC 24 develops a signal based on an output from the SLIC 22 at port VTX that reflects current sensed by the SLIC 22 at protected tip (PT) port and protected ring (PR) port. The developed signal can be fed back to the tip/ring lines 20 via the SLIC ports PT and PR to synthesize an impedance that complies with the Telcordia Standard, i.e., 900 Ω+2.16 μF. In a typical arrangement, the SLIC 22 receives the signal from the CODEC 24 through a non-inverting receive AC signal input (RCVP) and an inverting receive AC signal input (RCVN).
Recently, asynchronous digital subscriber line (ADSL) has become a common standard for transferring data at a very high rate between the subscriber 10 and the TCCO 14. ADSL service is provided over the same tip/ring lines 20 as POTS. The ADSL signals are transmitted in a frequency band above about 25 kHz, whereas traditional POTS signals are transmitted in a frequency band below about 4 kHz.
A problem that arises when the transformer 26 containing the transformer blocking capacitor 28 is inserted into the traditional POTS circuitry is that, at higher frequencies of the POTS band, e.g., above about 2 kHz, the transformer blocking capacitor 28 begins to pass AC current. Because current begins to flow through the transformer blocking capacitor 28 at these frequencies, the impedance of the tip/ring lines 20 is essentially the impedance developed by the CODEC 24 and SLIC 22 in parallel with the impedance of the transformer blocking capacitor 28. (The impedance through the windings of the transformer 26 is essentially zero at these frequencies.) This reduces the impedance of the tip/ring lines 20 at these higher POTS band frequencies, thereby adversely affecting the quality of the POTS.
Accordingly, methods and apparatuses are needed to compensate for the transformer blocking capacitor's effect on impedance for signals having frequencies in the POTS band, while not affecting the impedance for signals having frequencies in the ADSL band.
The present invention provides a method and apparatus for cancelling a portion of the effect of a transformer blocking capacitor within a transformer of an interface circuit on signals having frequencies in the POTS band. The method and apparatus overcome the aforementioned problems by sensing a differential voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor, developing a cancellation signal based on the differential voltage, and placing the cancellation signal on the tip/ring lines to compensate for the effects of the transformer blocking capacitor. In addition, the present invention provides for an impedance regulation method and apparatus for regulating the impedance on the tip/ring lines that incorporates the cancellation method and apparatus.
One aspect of the present invention is a method for compensating for a portion of the effect of a transformer blocking capacitor in an interface circuit on the impedance between tip/ring lines. The method comprises sensing a differential voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor, generating a cancellation signal based on the differential voltage, the cancellation signal comprising frequencies below a predetermined frequency, and adding the capacitor cancellation signal to the tip/ring lines to compensate for a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor on the impedance between the tip/ring lines below the predetermined frequency.
Another aspect of the invention is an apparatus for compensating for the effect of a transformer blocking capacitor in an interface circuit on the impedance between tip/ring lines. The apparatus comprises a sensor to sense a differential voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor and develop a capacitor voltage signal from the sensed differential voltage and an amplifier to amplify the capacitor voltage signal to obtain a cancellation signal, the cancellation signal cancelling a portion of the transformer blocking capacitor's effect on impedance when added to the tip/ring lines.
The transformer 26 passes signals having frequencies that are above a predetermined frequency and prevents signals having frequencies below this predetermined frequency from passing. The transformer 26 includes a transformer blocking capacitor 28, which is selected to allow the transformer 26 to pass signals with frequencies above the predetermined frequency. The transformer blocking capacitor 28 acts as an open circuit for signals having frequencies below the predetermined frequency, thereby preventing signals having frequencies below this level from passing through the transformer 26. At frequencies near the predetermined frequency, however, the transformer blocking capacitor 28 begins to pass current, thereby reducing the impedance between the tip/ring lines 20. In the illustrated embodiment, the transformer 26 is coupled between the tip line 16 and the ring line 18. In addition, the transformer 26 is coupled to ADSL circuitry 30.
In one embodiment, the transformer blocking capacitor 28 is selected to allow the transformer 26 to pass signals having a frequency above about 4 kHz for processing by the ADSL circuitry 30. Since ADSL signals have frequencies above about 25 kHz and POTS signals have frequencies below about 4 kHz, the transformer 26 in this embodiment allows only the ADSL signals to pass through to the ADSL circuitry 30. In this embodiment, the blocking capacitor 28 will begin to pass current at frequencies near 4 kHz, e.g., above about 2 kHz. The selection of a suitable transformer 26 and transformer blocking capacitor 28 for use in accordance with the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art.
The LPF 32 passes signals having frequencies that are below a predetermined frequency and prevents signals having frequencies above this predetermined frequncy from passing. In the illustrated embodiment, the LPF 32 is coupled between the tip line 16 and the ring line 18. In addition, the LPF 32 is coupled to the CODEC 24 and CCC 100 through the SLIC 22. The illustrated LPF 32 includes a coupled inductor 34 and a capacitor 36. The coupled inductor 34 and the capacitor 36 are selected in a known manner to block signals having frequencies above a predetermined frequency and pass signals having frequencies below that frequency. In one embodiment, signals in the ADSL frequency band, e.g., above about 25 kHz, are blocked while signals in the POTS frequency band, e.g., below about 4 kHz, are allowed to pass for processing by the CODEC 24 and SLIC 22. An example of a suitable coupled inductor 34 is ADSL Inductor 0560-6100-42 available from Bel Fuse Inc. of Jersey City, N.J.
The SLIC 22 is a subscriber line interface circuit. In the embodiment illustrated in
In one embodiment, the SLIC 22 senses the current of the tip/ring lines 20 through the PT port and PR port coupled to the tip/ring lines 20 through a pair of resistors 38 and 40 and the LPF 32. The VTX port of the SLIC 22 is coupled to the CODEC 24 for passing an output signal proportional to the difference in current between the tip/ring lines 20 to the CODEC 24, and the RCVN port of the SLIC 22 is coupled to the CODEC 24 to receive signals from the CODEC 24. The SLIC 22 also includes a reference voltage port VRTX to provide a voltage reference for other components within the interface circuit, thereby ensuring proper DC bias levels at the RCVN and RCVP ports. The SLIC 22 may be a L7585F Full-Feature, Low-Power SLIC and Switch available through Agere Systems Inc. of Allentown, Pa., USA.
The CODEC 24 processes information received from the tip/ring lines 20 and generates an impedance signal in a known manner that can be added to the tip/ring lines 20 to synthesize an impedance on the tip/ring lines 20. In the illustrated embodiment, the CODEC 24 is coupled to the tip/ring lines 20 through the SLIC 22 and LPF 32. In one embodiment, the CODEC 24 receives a signal from the VTX port of the SLIC 22 that represents the currents on the tip/ring lines 20 and generates the impedance signal in a known manner for synthesizing an impedance on the tip/ring lines 20. In conventional interface circuits, the CODEC 24 passes information to the SLIC 22 via a differential signal applied to the RCVN and RCVP ports of the SLIC 22. In the illustrated embodiment, the differential signal from the CODEC 24 is converted to a single ended signal that is passed to the RCVN port of the SLIC 22, which is described in detail further below in the description of FIG. 5. The CODEC 24 may be a programmable CODEC such as the T8531 available from Lucent Technologies, Inc.
The CCC 100 is a circuit for generating a signal to cancel a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 on impedance between the tip/ring lines 20. In one embodiment, the CCC 100 senses the voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor 28 and generates a capacitor cancellation signal for canceling a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 on the impedance of the tip/ring lines 20 for signals having a frequency below a predetermined frequency. In the illustrated embodiment, the CCC 100 is coupled across the transformer blocking capacitor 28 at sensing ports P1 and P2 to sense a voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor 28. A capacitor cancellation signal generated by the CCC 100 is then added to the tip/ring lines 20 through the SLIC 22 and the low pass filter 32.
In general, to remove a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 on the impedance of the tip/ring lines 20, the CCC 100 effectively adds a negative capacitance to the tip/ring lines 20 having a phase and a magnitude approaching that of the opposite of the capacitance of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, thereby increasing the impedance between the tip/ring lines 20 and negating the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28. It should be noted that only a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 is cancelled to avoid instability that may arise in the interface circuit if the capacitance of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 is negated completely. In one embodiment, the portion is at least about 90 percent, but less than 100 percent.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In the illustrated embodiment, one end of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, e.g., at port P1, is coupled to the non-inverting input of the OpAmp 106 through an input capacitor 108 and an input resistor 110 and the other end of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, e.g., at port P2, is coupled to the inverting input of the OpAmp 106 through another input capacitor 112 and input resistor 114. In addition, the non-inverting input of the OpAmp 106 is coupled to the VRTX port of the SLIC 22 (
The LPF 104 illustrated in
In the embodiment illustrated in
The output resistor 148 protects the SLIC 22 from potentially damaging current levels. For example, if the OpAmps 106, 126, and 128 are powered by a ±12V source and the voltage at the RCVP port should not exceed 5V, the output resistor 148 protects the RCVP port from potentially damaging current levels generated by the OpAmps 106, 126, and 128 that could damage the SLIC 22.
In the embodiment illustrated in
In use, the interface circuit depicted in
The known optimization techniques determine resistor and capacitor values based on parameters supplied to a computer optimization program. In one embodiment, the parameters include the maximum return loss of the tip/ring lines 22 and the maximum amount of ADSL signal allowed to “leak” through the low pass filter 104 without creating noise problems in the POTS band. The maximum return loss parameter may be (1) −20 dB between 500 Hz-2.5 kHz and (2) −12 dB between 200 Hz-500 Hz and 2.5-3.4 kHz. In addition, the “leak” through parameter, given in terms of signal gain in the ADSL band (with tip/ring lines 20 as a reference), may be (1) RCVP Gain: −2 dB at 25 kHz, (2) RCVP Gain: −22 dB at 100 kHz, and (3) capacitor 36 voltage gain: 5 dB at 25 kHz.
The CCC 162 senses the voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor 28 and generates a cancellation signal for canceling a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 on the impedance of the tip/ring lines 20 for signals having a frequency below a predetermined frequency. In general, to remove a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, the CCC 162 effectively adds a negative capacitance to the tip/ring lines 20 having an opposite phase and a magnitude approaching that of the capacitance of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, thereby increasing the impedance and negating the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28. In the illustrated embodiment, the CCC 162 is coupled across the transformer blocking capacitor 28 at sensing ports P1 and P2 to sense a voltage across the transformer blocking capacitor 28, and the cancellation signal generated by the CCC 162 is added back across the sensing ports P1 and P2. As noted previously, only a portion of the effect of the transformer blocking capacitor 28 is canceled to avoid instability in the interface circuit. A detailed description of the CCC 162 is described in reference to
In the illustrated embodiment, one end of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, e.g., at P1, is coupled to the inverting input of the OpAmp 164 through an input capacitor 168 and an input resistor 170 and the other end of the transformer blocking capacitor 28, e.g., at P2, is coupled to the non-inverting input of the OpAmp 164 through another input capacitor 172 and input resistor 174. The non-inverting input of the OpAmp 164 is also connected to ground through a ground capacitor 176 and a ground resistor 178 connected in parallel. The output of the OpAmp 164 is fed back to the inverting input of the OpAmp 164 through a feedback capacitor 180 and a feedback resistor 182 connected in parallel. The output of the OpAmp 164 is also fed back to one of the sensing ports, e.g., P1, through the inverter 166 and a sensor feedback resistor 184 and capacitor 186 connected in series; and is fed back to the other sensing port, e.g., P2, through another sensor feedback resistor 188 and capacitor 190 connected in series. The amplification (i.e., gain) for the OpAmp 164 is selected based on the value of the transformer blocking capacitor 28. The appropriate amount of amplification may be calculated according to the equations in the description of FIG. 11. Values for the resistors and capacitors may be determined using known optimization techniques.
In the illustrated embodiment, the inverter 166 is a conventional OpAmp configured as an inverter. The inverting input of the OpAmp 192 is connected to the single ended output of the OpAmp 164 through an input resistor 194, the non-inverting input of the OpAmp 192 is connected to ground, and the output of the OpAmp 192 is fed back to the inverting input of the OpAmp 192 through a feedback resistor 196. The output of the OpAmp 192 is passed to one of the sensing ports, e.g., P1, through the sensor feedback resistor 184 and sensor feedback capacitor 186. Values for the resistors and capacitors may be selected using known optimization techniques.
Mathematical Support
The gain of the amplifier A is given as:
where Zc1 is the impedance of capacitor C1 and Zc2 is the impedance of capacitor C2.
If resistor R1 is equal to resistor R2 and capacitor C1 is equal to capacitor C2, the gain can be simplified to:
Since the current source CS is equal to 1 amp, the following equation can be developed:
where Zp is the impedance of resistor RP and inductor 34 (FIG. 3). RCVP can be represented as:
By substituting equation 4 into equation 3, it can then be shown that:
where Zth is the representation circuit's equivalent impedance.
The equivalent impedance can be rewritten as:
then, it can be shown that:
Zth=RT∥Zp (10)
From this analysis, it can be seen that the impedance effect of the blocking capacitor 28 represented by ZCx1 can be removed by the CCC 100 in
The gain of the amplifier A can be determined by rearranging equation 9 and substituting it into the gain equation of equation 1 as follows:
Since Zp is known, the appropriate gain for the CCC 100 can be determined once a capacitor value for CX1 is selected.
The transimpedance gain RF can be determined through the manipulation of an impedance synthesis equation. The impedance synthesis equation can be represented as:
Zth=(RPT+RPR)+(RTX*ACODEC*ARCV). (12)
RPT is resistor 38 (FIG. 3), RPR is resistor 40, and RTX is the transimpedance gain of the SLIC 22 from a differential input current I(PT, PR) to an output voltage VTX, i.e.,:
The voltage gain of the CODEC 24 is:
The receive voltage gain of the SLIC 22 is:
If the transimpedance gain RF from the PT/PR differential current input to the VRN/VRP differential voltage output is defined as:
Rf=RTX*ACODEC, and (16)
ARCV=2, the synthesized impedance Zth can be represented as:
Zth=(RPT+RPR)+2Rf. (17)
The equations for the gain of the amplifier A are the same as equations 1 and 2 above. Since the current source CS is equal to 1 amp, the following equation can be developed:
where Zp is the synthesized impedance for the feedback loop containing the CODEC 24 (
VRCVP can be represented as:
VRCVN can be represented as:
where Rf is the transimpedance gain for PT/PR to RCVN of SLIC 22 as defined in equation 16 above. Through substitution and algebraic manipulation it can be shown that:
Looking at the second factor of equation 18, substituting the value for VRCVN from equation 24, it can be shown that:
Through substitution and algebraic manipulation, equation 25 can be shown to equal:
Substituting equation 28 into equation 18:
The equivalent impedance Zth (Vo divided by 1 amp) of the representation circuit depicted in
Looking at the second and third factors in the denominator of equation 30:
Through manipulation and substitution, equation 31 becomes:
If the termination impedance is defined as:
ZT=Zp2Rf. (34)
Then it can be shown that equation 33 equals:
Therefore:
From this analysis, it can be seen that the impedance effect of the blocking capacitor 28 represented by ZCX1 can be removed by the CCC 100 in
The gain of the amplifier A can be determined by rearranging equation 31 and substituting it into the gain equation 1 as follows:
Equation 39 shows that the gain is a function of the synthesized impedance ZT.
The gain of amplifier A is given as:
The following equation can be developed:
where Zc1 is the impedance of capacitor C1 and Zcx1 is the impedance of capacitor Cx1.
It can then be shown that:
where Zth is the representation circuit's equivalent impedance.
If the following substitution is performed:
If 1/(Zc1′)is set to equal 1/(Zcx1), then:
Zth=RT. (48)
From this analysis, it can be seen that the impedance effect of the blocking capacitor 28 can be removed by the CCC 162 in
The gain of the amplifier A can be determined by substituting the criteria to set 1/(Zc1′) equal to 1/(Zcx1) into equation 41 to obtain:
therefore:
If values are selected for C1 and CX1, the gain of the amplifier A can be determined.
Having thus described a few particular embodiments of the invention, various alterations, modifications, and improvements will readily occur to those skilled in the art. Such alterations, modifications and improvements as are made obvious by this disclosure are intended to be part of this description though not expressly stated herein, and are intended to be within the spirit and scope of the invention. Accordingly, the foregoing description is by way of example only, and not limiting. The invention is limited only as defined in the following claims and equivalents thereto.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3855431 | Stewart | Dec 1974 | A |
3867589 | Junek | Feb 1975 | A |
4823383 | Cardot et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4899382 | Gartner | Feb 1990 | A |
6137880 | Bella | Oct 2000 | A |
6295343 | Hjartarson et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6418221 | Snow et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
20020181367 | Bolla et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20030112963 A1 | Jun 2003 | US |