This invention relates to semiconductor devices and, more particularly, to protection devices for protecting integrated circuits from various electrical transients, including electrostatic discharge.
As integrated circuit (IC) geometries continue to shrink, susceptibility to electrostatic discharge (ESD) damage increases. In particular, decreasing gate oxide thicknesses in MOS (metal-oxide-semiconductor) devices relative to breakdown voltage has resulted in an increased susceptibility to damage from the application of excessive voltages. During an ESD event, charge is transferred between one or more pins of the integrated circuit and another conducting object. This charge transfer can develop voltages that are large enough to break down insulating gate oxides, leading to failures, such as contact spiking, silicon melting, or metal interconnect melting.
Many attempts have been made in the prior art to protect semiconductor devices from such ESD events. One common approach uses protection circuits connected to I/O (input-output) pads of an IC to safely dissipate the energy associated with ESD events without causing any damage to the internal circuitry.
An exemplary embodiment of an ESD protection circuit is shown in the
A cross-sectional view of the ESD protection circuit of
Several trigger mechanisms have been used in the past to turn on SCR protection devices for ESD. These trigger mechanisms include avalanche breakdown of a drain diode of a MOS transistor, MOS transistor source-drain current and collector current from bipolar transistor. For example, in the circuit described above when the voltage on ESD bus reaches the NMOS drain breakdown voltage, current begins to flow in the N-well 210 between N+ regions 212 and 214 as the drain junction 204 breaks down, and injects holes into the substrate. The hole injection into substrate forward biases the N+ source 206 injecting electrons, which are collected by both the N+ drain 204, and the adjacent N-well. Simultaneous with the drain breakdown, the current flowing between the N+ regions 212 and 214 results in a voltage drop across the N-well, which causes the P+ region 216 to become forward biased resulting in an injection of holes into substrate, thereby hastening the transition of the SCR into a latched state.
The above described protection circuit works well with current generation of devices having circuit geometries much greater than 65 nm (nanometers). However, it will be appreciated that although the well current immediately starts flowing as soon as the FET drain junction starts avalanching, the SCR does not trigger until the FET reaches drain breakdown voltage. Thus, the turn on characteristic of the protection circuit is too slow for devices using technologies less than 65 nm, and in particular for fast ESD events, such as those described by the Charged Device Model (CDM) failures.
In addition, conventional protection circuits such as in
Accordingly, there is a need for a fast triggering ESD protection circuitry for protection in technologies less than 65 nm, and in particular for fast ESD events, such as those described by the CDM. There is also a need for an ESD protection circuitry in which trigger current and voltage can be set independently using many circuit and/or layout parameters, and where the trigger voltage is low enough.
The present invention provides a solution to these and other problems, and offers further advantages over conventional ESD protection approaches.
These and various other features and advantages of the present invention will be apparent upon reading of the following detailed description in conjunction with the accompanying drawings and the appended claims provided below, where:
The present invention is directed generally to a fast triggered SCR (silicon controlled rectifier) that can trigger at a low enough voltage to protect thin oxides in integrated circuits from various electrical transients, including electrostatic discharge (ESD).
In the following description, for purposes of explanation, numerous specific details are set forth in order to provide a thorough understanding of the present invention. It will be evident, however, to one skilled in the art that the present invention may be practiced without these specific details. In other instances, well-known structures, and techniques are not shown in detail or are shown in block diagram form in order to avoid unnecessarily obscuring an understanding of this description.
Reference in the description to “one embodiment” or “an embodiment” means that a particular feature, structure, or characteristic described in connection with the embodiment is included in at least one embodiment of the invention. The appearances of the phrase “in one embodiment” in various places in the specification do not necessarily all refer to the same embodiment. The term “to couple” as used herein may include both to directly connect and to indirectly connect through one or more intervening components.
The ESD clamp or protection circuit of the present invention will now be described in detail with reference to
In accordance with the present invention, the ESD protection circuit 300 further includes a trigger device comprising a gated-diode and MOS capacitor or a gated-diode/MOS capacitor 316 formed within a well region or well 318 in the substrate 306. In the embodiment shown, the gated-diode/MOS capacitor 316 is formed in an N-well of a P-type substrate 306, and comprises gate electrode or gate 320 separated from a channel region in the N-well by a thin gate oxide 322, and a number of diffusion regions including a first P+ diffusion region 324 and an N+ tap region 326. These first and second regions 324, 326, are shorted together to allow inversion current to flow and cause a current to flow in the Nwell 318.
In the embodiment shown, the well 318 is a well of N-type material or doping formed within a P-type substrate 306, however it will be appreciated by those skilled in the art that the materials of the well and substrate can be interchanged, along with interchanging of the diffusion regions of the SCR and the gated-diode/MOS capacitor 316 without departing from the spirit and scope of the invention. In addition, it is noted that the doping of the first diffusion region 308 and tap 310 of the SCR may be interchanged, with or without change to the substrate 306 or well 318 doping, to form a NPNP type SCR. Generally, the values for R and C in the RC network 304 are chosen such that during an ESD event the well 318 rises in potential faster than the gate 320 of the gated-diode MOS capacitor's 316 to which the protected node 302 is coupled. Thus, during an ESD event, such as the sudden application or zapping of the protected node 302 by a positive voltage with respect to Vss, the rapidly rising voltage causes an inversion current to flow from P+ diffusion region 324 of the gated-diode 316 charging the MOS capacitor. The charging current passing through the well 318 forward biases the first P+ diffusion region 308 rapidly triggering the SCR.
It will be understood from the above that the trigger mechanism is dependent on the charging current of the MOS capacitor 316 in combination with the well 318 resistance forward biasing the diffusion region 308. The well current is proportional to the MOS capacitor area, that is the area, A, under the gated-diode 316, and to the voltage rise rate (V/s) of the zap, and inversely proportional to the gate dielectric 322 thickness. Moreover, the isolation space or length between the SCR and the gated-diode 316, indicated by arrow L1 in
Referring again to
The ESD protection circuit 300 of the present invention is particularly suitable for use as power supply protection, since the SCR is stable, that is not-conducting, since the gated-diode does not charge within a threshold voltage (VT) noise level of the power 15 supply. Methods for transferring charge from a protected node to Vss during an ESD event according to an embodiment of the present invention will now be described with reference to the flowchart of
Referring to
The advantages of the ESD protection circuit of the present invention over previous or conventional methods include: (i) a trigger time fast enough for CDM protection in submicron 45 nm and 65 nm CMOS transistors; (ii) trigger voltage low enough to protect very thin gate oxides; (iii) trigger current and voltage can be set using many layout parameters; (iv) high stability for power supply protection; (v) fabrication of the protection circuitry does not conflict with existing processing steps nor require extra manufacturing steps; and (vi) provides sufficient ESD protection without the degradation in performance of the protected circuit.
The foregoing description of specific embodiments and examples of the invention have been presented for the purpose of illustration and description, and although the invention has been described and illustrated by certain of the preceding examples, it is not to be construed as being limited thereby. They are not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed, and many modifications, improvements and variations within the scope of the invention are possible in light of the above teaching. It is intended that the scope of the invention encompass the generic area as herein disclosed, and by the claims appended hereto and their equivalents. The scope of the present invention is defined by the claims, which includes known equivalents and unforeseeable equivalents at the time of filing of this application.
The present application claims the benefit of priority under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) to U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/761,528 filed Jan. 24, 2006, entitled A Fast Capacitor Triggered SCR ESD Clamp for CMOS; which application is hereby incorporated by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4990802 | Smooha | Feb 1991 | A |
5019888 | Scott et al. | May 1991 | A |
5043782 | Avery | Aug 1991 | A |
5140401 | Ker et al. | Aug 1992 | A |
5157573 | Lee et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
5159518 | Roy | Oct 1992 | A |
5173755 | Co | Dec 1992 | A |
5182220 | Ker et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
5218222 | Roberts | Jun 1993 | A |
5237395 | Lee | Aug 1993 | A |
5264723 | Strauss | Nov 1993 | A |
5289334 | Ker et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
5311391 | Dungan | May 1994 | A |
5329143 | Chan et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5444400 | Hall | Aug 1995 | A |
5508649 | Shay | Apr 1996 | A |
5576557 | Ker et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5591992 | Leach | Jan 1997 | A |
5602404 | Chen et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
5625522 | Watt | Apr 1997 | A |
5640299 | Leach | Jun 1997 | A |
5670799 | Croft | Sep 1997 | A |
5671111 | Chen | Sep 1997 | A |
5675469 | Racino et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5682047 | Consiglio et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5751507 | Watt et al. | May 1998 | A |
5825600 | Watt | Oct 1998 | A |
6011420 | Watt et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6091114 | Mogul et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
6140189 | Hsu et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6358781 | Lee et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6765771 | Ker et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60761528 | Jan 2006 | US |