This disclosure relates to capsules, for instance, gelatin-type capsules of the type commonly used for administering medicines, dietary supplements, etc.
Capsules for holding medicines, dietary supplements, etc., are very well known and have been in commercial use for many years for human and veterinary use. They are typically made of a digestible gelatin-like material and contain a medicine in liquid or powder form or a dietary supplement, such as vitamins, fish oil, etc. in a single internal cavity (compartment). Moreover, such capsules are typically manufactured in certain standard sizes referred to as capsule size designated by numerals, such as 000, 00, etc. One of the most common sizes is the 00 capsule. This disclosure is generally of a capsule of 00 size, but this is not at all limiting but is merely illustrative. The typical 00 size capsule, in common with other capsules, has a standardized nominal volume. For instance, a 00 capsule has a volume of approximately 0.95 milliliters. The typical weight of such a typical capsule is 119 milligrams. Such capsules typically have two parts, a cap and a body, which are bonded together. The typical nominal length of the cap (along the long axis of the capsule) is 11.8 mm, plus or minus 0.4 mm. The length of the body (also as a separate component) is 20.2 mm plus or minus 0.4 mm. The overall assembled length of such a capsule is 23.5 mm plus or minus 0.4 mm. The outside diameter of the cap is typically 8.5 mm plus or minus 0.03 mm and the outside diameter of the body, which is slightly smaller than that of the cap, since typically the cap fits over the body when assembled, is 8.22 mm, plus or minus 0.03 mm. Other sizes of capsules each have their own nominal dimension
Most such capsules only contain a single ingredient in a single compartment. However, it is known in the field to provide capsules which hold two ingredients in two separate compartments. These are used when the ingredients should not be mixed together inside the capsule. For an example of same see
A different two-compartment capsule is shown similarly in cross-section in present
However, such two-compartment capsules are not believed to be in wide (if any) commercial use likely due to the difficulties of successfully making and filling same in large volume. The present inventors, moreover, have determined there are several technical deficiencies with these known two-compartment capsules. They identified two such aspects, which it is believed are not properly addressed up to now. One is during assembly of the capsule (when it is being filled with the ingredients) to provide proper alignment of the diaphragm that results in an even edge at the top of the capsule/diaphragm mouth, allowing for a good seal surface at both at the tops and the sides of the diaphragm. This technical problem may be addressed by the sidewalls of the diaphragm 24 in
Therefore, the present inventors have determined that an improved two-compartment capsule includes, as is conventional, a cap, diaphragm and body. The general configuration of this capsule is similar to those known in the field. However, certain particular dimensions and dimension parameters of the diaphragm relative to the body have been determined by them to be important to solve the above indicated technical deficiencies. Specifically, a ratio of the length of the body of the capsule to the length of the diaphragm along the length axis of the entire capsule has been found to be optimized in a range of 2.0 to 2.9. Specifically, in the case of a 00 size capsule having a body of approximately 20.2 mm long, the length of the diaphragm is approximately 8.5 mm and in the range of 7 to 10 mm. For such a capsule with a length of 8.5 mm, this ratio is 20.2 to 8.5, equal to approximately 2.37. For other capsule sizes, this ratio and possibly the length would also apply, since some of the other capsules are significantly larger or smaller in terms of length. Further, a particular length of the sidewall contact region between the straight cylindrical walls of the diaphragm and the inner surface of the body has been found to be optimized at a length in the range of 4.5 to 7 mm. For a size 00 capsule, this sidewall contact region is approximately 6 mm in length.
It was found that a shorter diaphragm (outside the above ranges) is unstable and thus tends to rotate inside the body during insertion of the diaphragm into the capsule, prior to capsule sealing. Such a shorter diaphragm does not hold sidewall integrity even after the diaphragm and body are bonded together and so the resulting capsule may not hold together. This instability is made worse after capsule filling, when the capsule is stored and shipped at different temperatures which may cause expansion of the air/gas/liquid inside the capsule resulting in stress on the capsule and the possibility of capsule leakage or rupture. Further, a much longer in length diaphragm (outside the above ranges) has been found to cause problems, especially when the lower compartment, defined between the diaphragm and the body, is filled with a liquid, topped off with a gas, in which case the pressure and sidewall friction of the diaphragm insertion becomes great and the internal pressure builds up, causing the likelihood of a rupture of the capsule during its assembly.
So this particular configuration provides optimum alignment of the diaphragm during assembly which results in an even edge at the top of the capsule/diaphragm mouth along with a good seal surface both at the rim and the sides of the diaphragm. In one embodiment, both the sidewall and rim of the diaphragm are sealed to the body. Given this configuration, of the total length of the diaphragm, approximately 2.5 mm is the curved or hemispherical section and the remainder of the length is allocated to its straight sidewalls. This sidewall length acts as both a support and a sidewall seal. It has been found that if the length of this sidewall contact with the body is less than approximately 4.5 mm, the body-diaphragm seal is likely to fail. Of course, having too much at length of this sidewall contact area would severely reduce the volume at the lower portion that is the lower compartment of the capsule, thus reducing the capsule's utility. For the above described diaphragm with a length of 8.5 mm and sidewall that is 6 mm long (hence the length of the hemispherical portion of the diaphragm is 2.5 mm long), a ratio of the length of the diaphragm's sidewall contact area to the overall length of the body is approximately 6 mm to 20.2 mm, a ratio of approximately 0.3. Generally this ratio is in the range of 0.22 to 0.37. A range for this sidewall length for an exemplary capsule is 4.5 to 7.5 mm. Note that in accordance with the invention, the differences from a standard 00 (or other size) capsule lie in the diaphragm and its relationship to the body, whereas the cap is essentially conventional.
Present
Assembling and filling single compartment capsules is well known in the field, as is manufacturing their components, so further details regarding this are not disclosed here. The above-referenced international applications describe ways to fill and bond together the components of such two-compartment capsules, but that is merely exemplary and other techniques can be used for filling and assembly, as known in the field. Hence the filling and sealing of the present capsules is not limited to the methods described in those international applications.
Often the capsule filler organization does not fabricate its own capsule components, but in some cases they do. In other cases, these components are purchased by the filler organization. It is therefore contemplated that in accordance with the invention, various embodiments include (1) provision of the three separate capsule components shown in
So as explained above, the relevant relationship and parameters of the present capsules is that in one aspect a ratio of the length of the body of the capsule (along its length axis), to the overall length of the diaphragm along the same axis is in the range of 2.0 to 2.9, with an exemplary ratio value of approximately 2.37. Again, while this is specifically applicable to the 00 type capsule, this ratio would also apply to other size capsules.
In another aspect, the sidewall of the diaphragm which is the straight portion of the diaphragm, and which is cylindrical, extends along the inner surface of the body when the diaphragm is inserted into the body for a distance in the range of 4.5 to 7.5 mm, with an exemplary value of approximately 6 mm.
In another aspect, the overall length of the diaphragm, shown in exploded view in
Further, in another aspect, the ratio of the sidewall contact length of the diaphragm to the length of the body is approximately 6 mm to 20.2 mm, equal to approximately 0.3. A range of this ratio is approximately 0.22 to 0.37.
As pointed out above, the above parameters and dimensions provide the advantage that the capsule diaphragm, when inserted into the body, during the assembly of the capsule, does not rotate and preserves the capsule's sidewall integrity. Also, these components are configured such that the pressure of the insertion does not need to be too great, thereby preventing a rupture of the capsule during assembly. As noted above, these capsules are such that they are sealed under a certain amount of pressure by the sealing machinery that bonds their components together. Thus a goal here is that the sidewall contact area between the diaphragm and the body allows for optimum alignment of the diaphragm during insertion, resulting in an even edge at the top of the body/diaphragm mouth, providing a good seal both at the body perimeter and its sides. Also, it is intended that this sidewall contact provide adequate friction for the seal, in terms of the overall structure, integrity and robustness of the capsule. Thus, this configuration provides stability and adequate sidewall friction for the seal which advantageously allows for high volume manufacturing with small tolerances. Note that the present sealing process typically includes an application of pressure and heat to bond the gelatin of the capsule components where they overlap, not just a friction fit. In the presently disclosed capsules, the sidewall friction is such that by itself it provides a level of orientation and stability in addition to that provided by the bonding of the components together.
This disclosure is illustrative and not limited; further, modifications and improvements to the disclosed embodiments will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of this disclosure, and are intended to fall within the scope of the pending claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
961936 | Colton et al. | Jun 1910 | A |
1510260 | Cyrenius | Sep 1924 | A |
1861047 | Colton | May 1932 | A |
2584622 | Scherer et al. | Feb 1952 | A |
2738827 | Roll | Mar 1956 | A |
2936493 | Scherer | May 1960 | A |
3186910 | Glassman | Jun 1965 | A |
3200556 | Ackley | Aug 1965 | A |
3228789 | Glassman | Jan 1966 | A |
3324902 | Lense | Jun 1967 | A |
3518340 | Raper | Jun 1970 | A |
3538677 | Amoroso et al. | Nov 1970 | A |
3886940 | Hunger | Jun 1975 | A |
3893278 | Lewis | Jul 1975 | A |
3927195 | Messora | Dec 1975 | A |
3978640 | Crossley et al. | Sep 1976 | A |
4007942 | Hofliger | Feb 1977 | A |
4196565 | Bodenmann et al. | Apr 1980 | A |
4231211 | Strampfer et al. | Nov 1980 | A |
4403461 | Goutard et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4450877 | Walker et al. | May 1984 | A |
4522666 | Wittwer | Jun 1985 | A |
4543138 | Bollinger et al. | Sep 1985 | A |
4609417 | Smith | Sep 1986 | A |
4627850 | Deters et al. | Dec 1986 | A |
4656066 | Wittwer | Apr 1987 | A |
4659415 | Shimokawa et al. | Apr 1987 | A |
4662155 | Chasman | May 1987 | A |
4667498 | Sauter | May 1987 | A |
4724019 | Brown et al. | Feb 1988 | A |
4793493 | Makiej, Jr. | Dec 1988 | A |
4899516 | Krieger et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
4964262 | Moser et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
4991377 | Marchesini | Feb 1991 | A |
4993137 | Muto et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5074426 | Goodhart et al. | Dec 1991 | A |
5081822 | Boyd et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5110597 | Wong et al. | May 1992 | A |
5111642 | Chiari | May 1992 | A |
5188688 | Boardman et al. | Feb 1993 | A |
5223265 | Wong | Jun 1993 | A |
5507640 | Gilmer et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5674530 | Amidon et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5698155 | Grosswald et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
5800422 | Dong et al. | Sep 1998 | A |
5897874 | Stevens et al. | Apr 1999 | A |
5938654 | Wong et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
5967405 | Hanauska | Oct 1999 | A |
5976571 | Crison et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6303144 | Omura | Oct 2001 | B1 |
7163693 | Clarke et al. | Jan 2007 | B1 |
7523596 | Dovesi | Apr 2009 | B2 |
7645407 | Cade et al. | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7694497 | Tagliavini et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8621825 | Schmied et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
20020098172 | Udell et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20030029558 | Hochrainer et al. | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20030194429 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20030194431 | Miller et al. | Oct 2003 | A1 |
20040081689 | Dunfield et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040170679 | Schurig et al. | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20050008690 | Miller | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20060064943 | Trebbi et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060159745 | Baksh | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060188607 | Schramm et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20070065502 | Baksh | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070087048 | Abrams et al. | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20080102113 | Rosenberg | May 2008 | A1 |
20080236106 | Trebbi et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20090162430 | Mahmoud et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090205748 | Ansaloni | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100009027 | Cade et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100209389 | McInnes et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100212261 | Boldis et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110088355 | Fulper | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20120035528 | Coppeta et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120039998 | Valla et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120049410 | Altamar et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20130186561 | Van Rooyen et al. | Jul 2013 | A1 |
20130233467 | Van Rooyen et al. | Sep 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
763203 | Jul 1967 | CA |
781906 | Apr 1968 | CA |
27 29 007 | Jan 1979 | DE |
0 308 637 | Mar 1989 | EP |
1 459 725 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1454013 | Aug 1966 | FR |
1027779 | Apr 1966 | GB |
1027780 | Apr 1966 | GB |
2002316 | Feb 1979 | GB |
7610038 | Mar 1978 | NL |
WO-9403365 | Feb 1994 | WO |
WO-2007047371 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2007047371 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO-2008113368 | Sep 2008 | WO |
WO-2013050973 | Apr 2013 | WO |
WO-2013050974 | Apr 2013 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Capsule Size Chart by Torpac Inc. (2000, pp. 1-3). |
International Search Report mailed Mar. 22, 2013, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055372 filed on Oct. 5, 2012, four pages. |
International Search Report mailed Feb. 12, 2013, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055374 filed on Oct. 5, 2012, four pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Mar. 22, 2013, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055372 filed on Oct. 5, 2012, five pages. |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority mailed Feb. 12, 2013, for PCT Patent Application No. PCT/IB2012/055374 filed on Oct. 5, 2012, six pages. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20140302133 A1 | Oct 2014 | US |