Captioned telephone service

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 10587751
  • Patent Number
    10,587,751
  • Date Filed
    Thursday, July 25, 2013
    10 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 10, 2020
    4 years ago
Abstract
A method of operating a captioned telephone call in which an assisted user is connected by a captioned telephone device that is connected both by a first line to a remote user and a second line to a relay providing captioning for a conversation, the method comprising the steps of: when a start of an incoming call is detected by the captioned telephone device on the first line, the captioned telephone device automatically calling the relay on the second line to initiate captioning service set up; the captioned telephone device passing spoken words received on the first line to the second line; and the relay then providing text captions of the spoken words back to the captioned telephone device on the second line.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Modern telecommunication systems include facilities to permit use of telecommunication systems by those who are deaf or hard of hearing. The best known form of such communication makes use of devices known as telecommunication devices for the deaf (TDD), also known as text telephones (TTY). TTY communication is widely used between deaf people. Hearing users communicate with deaf users who are users of TDD devices through so-called “relays.” A relay is a telecommunication intermediary service, funded by telephone communication surcharges, which is intended to permit deaf or hard of hearing people to utilize the normal telephone network. At a relay, an operator referred to as a call assistant intermediates between a deaf user and a hearing person by communicating with the deaf person using a TDD and communicating with the hearing person by voice over a normal telephone line.


Previous technology has enabled the relay system to be used to provide a form of enhanced telephone communication for people who are not deaf, but are hard of hearing. This approach to telecommunications is exemplified by U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,307,921 and 6,075,842, the disclosure of which is incorporated by reference. These patents, entitled “Text Enhanced Telephony,” referred to a system that provides captioned telephone service, a service currently marketed under the service mark Captel by Ultratec, Inc. and its licensees. A captioned telephone, or telephone enabled to do text enhanced telephony, is capable of providing a text message to a user of the words which are transmitted to that user over a conventional telephone line. The captioned telephone user receives normal voice from the party on the other end of the line, as well as a text transcription of the words spoken by the other party, so that the user may refer to the text for missed words in the conversation. This capability is made possible by automation in the relay which permits text or captioning to be delivered nearly simultaneously with voice. In addition, the telephone station of the assisted user is specially configured to facilitate the set up of captioned telephone calls.


In its original conception, the text assisted telephone system was designed to be deliverable to and operated by a user over a single telephone line to the user. As the costs of telephone service drops, it is now apparent that many users of captioned telephone service may elect to use two telephone lines to take full advantage of the opportunity for improved service that comes from text enhanced telephone. The concept of using two telephone lines to provide captioned telephone service in general to an assisted user is disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, the disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.


BRIEF SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention is summarized in a method of operating a captioned telephone call in which an assisted user is connected by through a captioned telephone device which is connected both to one telephone line to a remote user and a second telephone line to a relay providing captioning for the conversation. The method includes the steps of when the assisted user initiates a call by dialing a telephone number on the first telephone line, the captioned telephone device storing the telephone number without dialing immediately on the first telephone line; the captioned telephone device initiating a call on the second telephone line to the relay to initiate captioning service set up; and the captioned telephone device then dialing the stored telephone number on the first telephone line.


It is an object of the present invention to provide a captioned telephone service that is as automatic as it can be made in terms of services and options to the assisted user.


It is another object of the present invention to make a captioned telephone service that, to the user, seems as close as possible to conventional telephone service for fully hearing users.


It is another object of the present invention to define a captioned telephone system in which the relay call assistant does not have to hear the voice of the assisted user.


Other objects, advantages and features of the present invention will become apparent from the following specification.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE SEVERAL VIEWS OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the arrangement of the parties in a captioned telephone call system as described here.



FIG. 2 is a schematic diagram or a combined telephone and captioned telephone device.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Shown in FIG. 1 is a schematic view of the arrangement for a generalized two line captioned telephone service. An assisted user is positioned to use a telephone 10. The user telephone is connected to a captioned telephone device 12, which is interposed between the telephone 10 and a first telephone line 14. As an alternative, the captioned telephone device 12 is preferably built into the same physical case as the telephone 10, but these are shown in separate boxes in FIG. 1 for purposed of clarity of illustration. The first telephone line 14 connects to a remote telephone 16, which is the station of the caller or person to whom the assisted user wishes to speak. The captioned telephone device is also connected to a second telephone line 18, which is connected at its other end to a relay, indicated at 20. The relay 20 is preferably a relay of the type described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, among others, and currently commercially available under the name Captel™ relay, from CapTel, Inc.


In its general operation, the person at the remote telephone 16 would converse normally with the assisted user at the telephone 10. At the captioned telephone device 12, the voice of the remote user is passed along the second telephone line 18 to the relay 20. At the relay 20, the voice carrying the spoken words of the remote user is converted into a text or digital massage stream that is passed back to the captioned telephone device 12 over the same telephone line 18. The captioned telephone device 12 displays the text of the digital message stream received from the relay 20, so that the assisted user can read the words spoken by the remote user. The captioned telephone device 12 is constructed to not pass voice or digital signals from the relay onto the first telephone line, so that the digital communication tones from the relay do not distract or bother the users. If the assisted user can hear and understand the words spoken by the remote user, the assisted user can respond normally. If the assisted user has difficulty in hearing or understanding any words spoken by the remote user, those words are displayed for the assisted user by the captioned telephone device so that the assisted user can read the words. Thus the service is unobtrusive and available as needed to help the assisted user.


In the preferred embodiment of the captioned telephone device 12, the captioned telephone device 12 and the telephone 10 are combined in a single device. Shown in FIG. 2 is a captioned telephone device 100 which embodies that combination. This device is also intended to support a communication, command and signaling protocol known as UVT to facilitate captioned call, as is described in more detail in U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,910, which is hereby incorporated by reference. In FIG. 2 the interior components of the captioned telephone device 100 are illustrated in block diagrams indicating the digital logic components from which the device may be constructed. It is preferred, however, that the components within the dotted lines in FIG. 2, labeled as DSP software, actually be implemented in the form of a software routine operating a digital signal processing integrated circuit to perform the functions of the illustrated blocks. In the captioned telephone device 100, the telephonic connection to the relay, i.e. the connection to the second telephone line 18, is indicated at 102. The input telephonic signal connects to a DAA and hybrid 104 and then to a codec 106 to digitize input signals. Following the codec 106 is a modem 108, the output of which connects to a UVT formatter 110. The UVT formatter 110 formats the digitized voice signals from the first telephone line for transmission to the relay service and to decode the digital text signals received. The digitized text signals are transferred from the UVT formatter 110 to a visually readable display 112 on which the text can be displayed for the assisted user. Voice signals from the first telephone line 14, indicated here as 121, are converted to digital signals by a codec 118. An echo control circuit 116 is used to remove the voice of the assisted user at a handset 120 from the voices of the other party. The output of the echo control 116 is sent to a vocoder 114 for compression, in this case, using G.729 protocols. The voice is passed to the UVT formatter 110 and on to a modem 108 for transmission to the relay center over the telephone line 102. In summary, the assisted station passes the voice from the first telephone line 121 to the speaker in the handset for the assisted user and also compresses the voice for transmission to the relay service over the telephone line 102. At the same time, it decodes the digital text stream and presents the text stream as a visual text message to the user on the display 112. The assisted user thus receives both the voice of the hearing user from the first telephone line and is provided a text display of the words spoken by the hearing user from the digital test sent over the second telephone line.


In general, the specification below describes only the differences in the operation of an captioned telephone service between that logically configured as shown in FIG. 1 and a similar captioned telephone device operating an a single telephone line. However, it should be understood that the physical embodiment of the devices and the telephone lines is subject to much variation. For example, while plain, unfeatured, land-line “plain old telephone services” are illustrated in FIG. 1, the telephone lines or connections themselves may be any of the more modern wired or wireless telephones available today. The captioned telephone device is, for example, preferably built in the same device as the telephone 12, as illustrated in FIG. 2. Similarly, the telephone lines 14 and 18 can be simple land-line two-wire telephone lines, but they could also be any other form of modern telephone interconnection, including cellular connections, PCS connections, or even data connections such as internet protocol (IP) connected across the internet or other data connection service. While two single telephone connections can be used for this function it is also understood that a single IP physical connection can serve as the two separate connections. Thus the term telephone line or telephone connection as used in this document is intended to be used to describe a voice capable interconnection between two remote telephone devices rather than being restricted to a physical pair of wires. In any event, as will be seen from the following description, a number of features of addition functionality are possible using a two-line captioned telephone connection that have not been previously contemplated. Several of such features are discussed and the features can be implemented as a group or individually.


Dial Delay


Assume that the party initiating the call session is the assisted user at the telephone 10. Assume as well that the assisted user wants the default configuration to be that his or her calls are a text assisted, or are captioned. The user picks up the handset of the telephone 10 and dials as normal the telephone number of the remote user. However, if the remote user was dialed immediately, there is a chance that the captioning service would not be ready to go at the time the remote user answers his or her telephone 16. So the captioned telephone device 12 at the station of the assisted user is programmed to intercept the dialing of the remote user and to instead first dial the relay 20 on telephone line 18. Typically, in the simplest embodiment, the captioned telephone device could simply store DTMF tones for the number dialed by the assisted user. When the relay 20 is engaged and ready to function, a command is sent over the telephone line 18 to the captioned telephone device 12 to initiate the call to the remote user. The captioned telephone device 12 then calls the telephone 14 of the remote user to initiate the call, as by placing the DTMF tones for the on the first telephone line 12 to make the call.


Using this concept of intercepting and storing the number called by the assisted user, the captioning function provided by the relay 20 is available from the start of the call. If, for example, the call does not go through properly, and a message is received from the telephone network, such as “all circuits are busy now, please try again later,” that message can be transmitted in text to the assisted user. If the assisted is so hearing impaired that the ringing or answering of the remote telephone cannot be understood, text messages from the relay can supply the needed information.


Again while the simplest embodiment of this feature is the interception of the DTMF tones, and the storage of those tones for later uses, the functional equivalent of that technique for other forms of telephone interconnection are also envisioned. If, for example, the telephone connection is actually through IP access over the internet, the captioned telephone device 12 could store the uniform resource address (URL) for the remote user, connect to the relay 20 by internet access or conventional telephone connection, and then implement the connection to the remote user to complete the call. Another alternative as to the implementation of this feature is to use a fixed time delay for dialing the remote station instead of waiting for an acknowledgement from the relay. A fixed time delay of a few seconds would normally suffice for the relay to be connected and up and running.


One safety detail is required to properly implement this feature. If the number dialed by the assisted user is “911” or other emergency assistance number, then the dial should not be delayed at all, and the dialing information should be immediately presented to the telephone network. Emergency service facilities, such as the various 911 services in the United States, are normally equipped with the capability to receive and communicate with hearing impaired callers directly, without the need for an intermediate relay. In addition, it is desirable that the response time for receipt and handling of the emergency services call not be impacted by other factors such as a potential busy time for service usage at the relay. Hence it is preferred that the captioned telephone device 12, whether it is a separate box or a part of the assisted user's telephone, scan the numbers dialed by the assisted user and immediately pass along any call to the local emergency services number regardless of the user's preferences about relay assistance in normal calls. In addition, when dialing 9-1-1 is detected, the captioned telephone device 12 can be equipped to have a second DTMF number or other method of connecting to the relay 20 which has priority over other calls such that the user dialing 9-1-1 is routed to the relay 20 and given captioning service in the minimum possible time delay.


Line Testing


A feature that modern telephone equipment makes possible is line testing to see if a telephone line is “on-hook” (meaning unused) or “off-hook” (meaning that the line is in use) This feature or capability tests the telephone line to which it is connected, and returns a signal of in use, not in use, or ringing. For two-line captioned telephone service, the ability to test line conditions permits condition responsive actuation of variations of the captioned telephone service.


For example, assume that the telephone 10 of the assisted user is not in use, but set up to answer and automatically initiate captioning by a call on the second telephone line 18 to the relay 20. Then when a call is received by the telephone 10, it can test the condition of the second telephone line 18 before responding. If the telephone line 18 is available, the assisted users' station can initiate the call to the relay to secure captioning service even before answering the incoming call on the first telephone line. If the second telephone line is busy, then station can inform the user and give the assisted user the option to capture the number of the caller using Caller-ID, and then call that same party right back using single line captioned service using only the first telephone line. The assisted user could also wait until the second line clears and then initiate a two-line captioned call.


Automated Mode Choice


As describe above, the captioned telephone device can sense the status of the telephone lines as to whether they are in use of not. In most cases, the device will use the same line, here telephone line 14, to connect to the remote caller, and a second telephone line 18 to connect to the relay. In this configuration, the assisted user would generally give out the telephone number of the first telephone line 14 as their telephone number. If an incoming call is received by the station of the assisted user, while the telephone is ringing, the captioned telephone device 12 checks the status of the second telephone line 18. If the second telephone line 18 is available, the normal implementation of two-line captioning can proceed. If the second telephone line is in use, the device then displays for the assisted user a message such as “Line 2 is in use, no captions available,” or other warning about the status of captioning. The assisted user can then decide if he or she wishes to answer the line and conduct the telephone call without captioning. Since the captioned telephone device preferably includes built-in Caller ID functionality, the assisted user can evaluate the availability for 2-line captioning service before picking up the telephone to answer the call.


The same information is, of course, available when the assisted user is the person doing the dialing. The assisted user dials a number, with the captioned telephone device set up to normally invoke captioning from the relay over the second telephone line 18. The captioned telephone device 12 senses, however, that the second line 18 is busy, and therefore provides a message to the assisted user such as “Line 2 not available, Use 1 line captioning?” If the assisted user elects to proceed with 1-line captioning, as by pressing a key on the captioned telephone device, the captioned telephone device would first call the relay 20 and pass to the relay command information so as to set the call up as a single line captioned call. In that mode, the relay is interposed between the assisted and remote callers, as described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405. If the assisted user does not wish to proceed with single line captioning, the assisted user can simply hang up and try again later when the second line might be available.


Automated Line Selection


As described above, the captioned telephone device can detect the status of the two telephone lines, and use that information in the set up of the captioned telephone call. The assisted user will normally have the first telephone line 14 set up to be the primary telephone line. In this configuration, the first line 14 would normally be the line on which the assisted user places and receives calls. However, the captioned telephone device 12 will also detect an incoming ring on the second telephone line 18 and signal to the assisted user that an incoming call is being detected. Such a signal may need to be a visual signal (such as displaying a message such as “Ring on Line 2” for users who cannot hear at all, while for a hearing user the signal for an incoming call on the second line can be a ringing tone different from that tone used with the first telephone line 14. If the captioned telephone device has been configured to set up a 2-line captioned telephone call, the device will then dial the relay 20 over the first telephone line and reverse the usual configuration.


Automated Installation


As mentioned, the captioned telephone device 12 is provided with the ability to sense the status of the two telephone lines to which it is connected. This permits automated set up of the device during installation. The user simply connects the telephone jacks to the standard ports provided on the captioned telephone device. The software in the device will detect that a telephone line is connected and automatically configure the software to use that telephone line as the first telephone line. If only one line is connected to the device, it still automatically set itself up to support one-line captioning for any telephone calls made. If the user has two telephone lines available, and the lines are connected to the captioned telephone device, it will detect that and will automatically configure itself to be able to support two-line captioning service. Used in this way, it is not mandatory that the assisted user actually designate either of the two telephone lines as their first or second line. The captioned telephone device will automatically configure itself for the telephone line or lines available and may the best adaptation that it can to any incoming or outgoing call. The captioned telephone device does have the alternative to designate one of the lines as the primary line, if that is needed for any reason.


Dial on Ring


When the assisted user receives a call using the captioned telephone service, the user answers the telephone just as they normally would, by picking up the handset or actuating the speakerphone, if equipped with one. When the start of an incoming call is detected by the captioned telephone device, it then checks the status of the control buttons on the face of the device and, assuming the captioning is selected, the captioned telephone device immediately dials the number of the relay. Normally it will take anywhere from a few seconds to tens of seconds before the captioning service is set up though the relay, depending on how busy the relay is at that moment. In most cases, the captioning service can be configured in ten to fifteen seconds. Obviously, by initiating the interconnection to the relay before the assisted user even picks up the telephone, the time required to begin captioning the call when it is answered is decreased. Note that since the largest cost at the relay is the call assistant, the relay would not assign a call assistant to the call until both parties have picked up their phones and are on the line. In that way, the cost of attention by a call assistant to the call is avoided if the assisted user does not actually answer the call.


Other strategies can be used to decrease the time for connection and set up. If an ISDN line is used for the second telephone line 18, the speed is increased since ISDN dialing is much faster than traditional DTMF dialing. However, since ISDN service is more expensive than traditional plain residential telephone service, other options may be more commercial acceptable to consumers. The captioning device can use Internet Protocol (IP) signaling to communicate with the relay service center. This would allow direct digital or internet connections for the delivery of the captions, i.e. the logical second telephone line 18 would actually be an IP connection. Since broadband connection to the internet, wired and unwired, is becoming increasingly common, this alternative will be a preferred choice for many consumers.


End of Call


Another method for reducing set up time is to briefly hold the connection to the relay, established over the second telephone line, after the assisted user ends the call on the first telephone line 14. This is to provide for the possibility that the caller is about to make another call. If the assisted user is about to make another call, the fact that the connection to the relay has been maintained shortens the time necessary to set up the second call. When the assisted user begins the second call, the relay is already connected and captioning can begin immediately. The holding period should be brief, i.e. 2 to 10 seconds. When the hold timer expires, the captioned telephone device 12 sends a UVT message to the relay indicating that a disconnect is in progress, and it hangs up on the telephone line to the relay. The receipt of the UVT disconnect message also signal to the captioning service that the encounter is finished for the creation of a billing record of the call.


Echo Cancellation


For single line captioned telephone service, echo cancellation is used in the equipment of the relay for the captioned telephone service for two reasons. The first reason is the captioning system uses digitized and compressed audio to transmit voice and the delays inherent in this process would cause echo back to the user, were it not for the fact that the echo is not suppressed by the software. The second reason is to remove or cancel the voice of the assisted user from the audio received from the hearing party or the remote user. This is done so that the call assistant at the relay only hears the voice of the remote user that is to be captioned and is not confused by the voice of the assisted user.


When the captioning service is provided using two lines, echo cancellation is still needed, but the arrangement of the echo cancellation is significantly different. The echo cancellation now is located in the captioned telephone device at the location of the assisted user. The echo cancellation circuitry or function acts to separate the local voice of the assisted user from any other voices on the first telephone line 14 as presented to the call assistant. In the 2-line arrangement, this echo cancellation at the captioned telephone device provides the same benefit to the call assistant at the relay. The echo cancellation is located between the first telephone lines 14 and the handset microphone of the assisted user, so that the second telephone line 18 does not transmit to the relay any of the voice of the assisted user at telephone 10 to the relay. Thus the call assistant at the relay 20 is not exposed to the voice of the assisted user. This makes the job of the call assistant easier, since the call assistant captions the voice he or she hears.


The arrangement provides a subsidiary benefit in that it permits other members of the household to also participate in the call, by picking up an extension telephone and joining in the conversation. The voice or voices of the other people on the line are also sent to the relay for captioning. Only the voice of the assisted user, at the station of the captioned telephone device 12, is subjected to the echo cancellation. So the assisted user also gains the benefit of captioning of the other voices in the conversation. For single line captioning service, participation by other members of the household is normally not possible because the telephone communication to the house is in the form of a data stream carrying voice and text and is not a voice connection.


Billing Information Transmittal


For traditional TTY relay calls and for single-line captioning service calls, the relay uses the automatic number identification (ANI), or calling party number (CPN), of the assisted user and the dialed number of the remote user to determine who will be billed for the relay service performed. In the U.S., and some other countries, relay service is usually paid for by third party payer, funded by governmental mandate to provide telephone communication for the hearing impaired at the same cost as that available to the hearing. Typically in the U.S., calls that are dialed back to the same state as the originating caller (intrastate calls) are paid for by the state of the two parties to the conversation. Note that the relay may or may not be in the state in which the two parties connect for a conversation. The cost of the relay services for calls that cross a state boundary (interstate calls) are paid for by the National Exchange Carriers Association (NECA). NECA maintains a system of sharing costs and revenue for interstate telephone traffic that crosses state regulatory boundaries. The state agencies and NECA share the costs for toll free calls by an assisted user.


For two-line captioning service, the assisted user dials the other party directly. Hence, the relay is no longer in the middle of the call, between the parties. Therefore, it is not inherently apparent to the relay whether the call is interstate or intrastate. So the captioned telephone device is programmed to keep a record of the telephone number dialed by the assisted user and to report this number to the relay as a part of the set up of the captioning service for the call. A UVT command is used to send the dialing information to the relay for capture and association with the billing records for the call. This information transmission allows the relay service providing the captioning to determine the appropriate billing type for calls dialed by the assisted user. Similarly, if caller ID information is received and captured as a part of an incoming call, the information can also be transmitted to the relay in a similar format to inform the relay of the category of the call.


Call Answering Service


With two-line captioned telephone service, it is readily possible to add automated message answering service as an added feature. When one of the telephone lines rings with an incoming call, the software of the captioned telephone device, configured for automatic answering, waits for a predetermined number of rings and then answers the line. The captioned telephone device meanwhile connects to the relay over the other telephone line. The captioned telephone device then plays a pre-recorded message typical of telephone answering machines for the benefit of the caller. The calling party responds by leaving a voice message, which is transmitted to the captioning relay 20 for transcription into a text message. The captioned telephone device can also capture the voice or the telephone number of the calling party. The transcription of the message is transmitted by the relay to the captioned telephone device and is stored as well as a text message. When the assisted user returns, the text message is stored in memory of the captioned telephone device 12 and the voice message and/or number of the calling party can be stored as well.


When the assisted user returns, he or she lifts the handset of the telephone and presses a button on the captioned telephone device (or the combined device if the telephone is a part of the device). The captioned telephone device is programmed to display the text message on its display and, if desired, play back the voice message and/or telephone number of the calling party. The message storage, either voice or text or both, could also take place at the relay, and if this alternative is implemented, when the user returns and asks for messages, the relay would be called and the stored message downloaded. Note that the call assistant is not required for this message playback service and hence the cost would not be large.


Selection of Service by Call Type


In its normal mode of operation, the captioned telephone device automatically dials to the captioning relay 20, using a pre-configured telephone number (or IP address) for the relay. The assisted user normally will not need to know or to dial the relay number to control this function. However, it is a useful variant that the captioning device be configured to dial different numbers depending on the type and/or the number that the assisted user dials. For example, as stated earlier, if the assisted user dials an emergency assistance number, such as 911, the software for the captioned telephone device can be programmed to dial a specific priority access number into the emergency response system. Other specific functions or calls that use this feature include captioning in other languages, retrieving messages from the captioned relay service, installing updates to the software for the captioned telephone device, and 900 calls. 900 calls are calls which authorize additional costs to the caller for a service offered by the 900 number and therefor 900 calls cost more than normal telephone calls. As a result, many telephone system users elect to disable their telephones from calling 900 numbers.


Normally the captioned telephone user will access the captioning relay by means of toll-free number (800 numbers in the U. S.). If the assisted call requests the relay to dial a 900 number, the 900 number block at the station of the user is avoided. Normally, an outside service, such as the relay, cannot determine if 900 number access is blocked for the user's telephone. To avoid this issue, the captioned telephone device could test the telephone numbers it handles, and be programmed to not pass along to the relay any 900 or other objectionable numbers.

Claims
  • 1. A method of operating a captioned telephone call in which an assisted user is connected by a captioned telephone device that is connected both by a first line to a remote user and a second line to a relay providing captioning for a conversation, the method comprising the steps of: when a start of an incoming call is detected by the captioned telephone device on the first line, without any input selection by the assisted user to initiate a captioning service, the captioned telephone device automatically calling the relay on the second line to initiate captioning service set up;the captioned telephone device passing spoken words received on the first line to the second line; andthe captioned telephone device then receiving text captions of the spoken words from the relay on the second line.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of initiating captioning service set up further comprises establishing communication with a call assistant.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of initiating captioning service set up further comprises establishing communication with a call assistant after a predetermined period.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of initiating captioning service set up further comprises establishing communication with a call assistant after the assisted user answers the call.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of initiating captioning service set up further comprises establishing communication with a call assistant when the assisted user answers the call.
  • 6. A method of operating a captioned telephone call in which an assisted user is connected by a captioned telephone device that is connected both by a first line to a remote user and a second line to a relay providing captioning for a conversation, the method comprising the steps of: when a call is received at the captioned telephone device on the first line, without any input selection by the assisted user to initiate a captioning service, the captioned telephone device automatically calling the relay on the second line to establish an interconnection to the relay;linking the call to an assigned call assistant after a predetermined condition is satisfied;the captioned telephone device passing spoken words received on the first line to the second line; andthe captioned telephone then receiving text captions of the spoken words from the relay on the second line.
  • 7. The method of claim 6 wherein the predetermined condition is the expiration of a predetermined period.
  • 8. The method of claim 6 wherein the predetermined condition is the assisted user answering the call.
  • 9. A method of operating a captioned telephone call in which an assisted user is connected to a relay providing captioning for a conversation by a captioned telephone device, the method comprising the steps of: the captioned telephone device automatically detecting a connection with at least one of a first line and a second line;the captioned telephone device automatically, and without user input, setting up to support one-line captioning if only the first line is connected to the captioned telephone device and automatically, and without user input, setting up to support two-line captioning if both the first line and the second line are connected to the captioned telephone device; andthe captioned telephone device then receiving text captions of spoken words from the relay.
  • 10. The method of claim 9, further comprising the captioned telephone device passing spoken words received on the first line to the second line.
  • 11. The method of claim 2 wherein communication is established with the assigned call assistant subsequent to the incoming call being answered.
  • 12. The method of claim 1 wherein the first line is a telephone line.
  • 13. The method of claim 1 wherein the second line is an internet connection.
  • 14. The method of claim 1 wherein the captioned telephone device includes at least one caption control feature for selecting automated captioning upon reception of an incoming call and wherein the step of automatically calling the relay includes the steps of checking a status of the caption control feature after an incoming call is detected and, when a captioning default is selected, automatically calling the relay.
  • 15. The method of claim 14 further including the steps of, when an assisted user uses the captioned device to initiate an outgoing call, checking the status of the caption control feature and, when the captioning default is selected, automatically calling the relay without requiring a new selection of the caption control feature by the assisted user.
  • 16. The method of claim 6 wherein the captioned telephone device includes at least one caption control feature for selecting automated captioning upon reception of an incoming call and wherein the step of automatically calling the relay includes the steps of checking a status of the caption control feature after an incoming call is detected and, when a captioning default is selected, automatically calling the relay.
  • 17. The method of claim 16 further including the steps of, when an assisted user uses the captioned device to initiate an outgoing call, checking the status of the caption control feature and, when the captioning default is selected, automatically calling the relay to initiate a captioning service without requiring a new selection of the caption control feature by the assisted user.
  • 18. A method of facilitating a captioned telephone call using a captioned telephone device used by an assisted user, the captioned telephone device connectable by a first line to a remote user and a second line to a relay providing captioning for a conversation, wherein the captioned telephone device includes at least one caption control feature for selecting automated captioning upon reception of an incoming call, the method comprising the steps of: upon detecting an incoming call on the first line, the captioned telephone device checking a status of the caption control feature and, when a captioning default is activated, without any input selection by the assisted user to initiate a captioning service subsequent to detection of the incoming call, automatically calling the relay on the second line to initiate captioning service set up;establishing communication with a call assistant assigned to the call to generate text captions corresponding to words spoken by the remote user;the captioned telephone device passing spoken words received from the remote user on the first line to the second line; andthe captioned telephone device receiving text captions of the spoken words from the relay on the second line.
  • 19. The method of claim 18 wherein the step of automatically calling the relay on the second line includes calling the relay prior to any voice communication between the assisted user and the remote user.
  • 20. The method of claim 1 wherein the step of automatically calling includes immediately calling the relay on the second line upon detection of an incoming call by the captioned telephone device on the first line.
  • 21. The method of claim 6 wherein the step of automatically calling includes immediately calling the relay on the second line upon detection of an incoming call by the captioned telephone device on the first line.
  • 22. The method of claim 18 wherein the step of automatically calling includes immediately calling the relay on the second line.
  • 23. The method of claim 1 wherein the captioned telephone device automatically calls the relay on the second line prior to a receiver associated with the captioned telephone device going off hook.
  • 24. The method of claim 23 wherein the step of initiating captioning service set up further comprises establishing communication with a call assistant.
  • 25. The method of claim 24 wherein the step of establishing communication with a call assistant includes establishing communication with the call assistant after the receiver associated with the captioned telephone device goes off hook.
  • 26. The method of claim 1 wherein the captioned telephone device automatically calls the relay on the second line to establish the communication with a call assistant in parallel with generating an audible alert to indicate that the incoming call has been received.
  • 27. A method of operating an assisted user's captioned telephone device to facilitate communication with a remote hearing user using a hearing user's communication device, the method for facilitating captioning of the hearing user's voice signal for the assisted user, the method comprising the steps of: upon the assisted user initiating a call to the remote user, prior to establishing a link to the remote user, without any user input selection to initiate a captioning service, the captioned telephone device automatically calling the relay to establish a first link to the relay and to initiate captioning service set up;subsequent to establishing the first link, the captioned telephone device initiating a second link to the hearing user's device for voice communications between the assisted user and the hearing user wherein the second link is independent of the first link.
  • 28. A method of operating an assisted user's captioned telephone device comprising the steps of: receiving, at the captioned telephone device, a request from an assisted user to listen to a hearing user's voice signal;in response to the request from the user, automatically delaying access to the hearing user's voice signal at the captioned telephone device until establishment of a connection between the captioned telephone device and a remote call assistant at a relay, in order to allow the remote call assistant to receive audio of the hearing user's voice signal from the very beginning of the hearing user's voice signal;providing the audio of the hearing user's voice signal to the remote call assistant at the relay over a network;obtaining, over the network, captions generated by the relay using the audio of the hearing user's voice signal; andpresenting, by the captioned telephone device, the captions substantially concurrently with broadcast of the audio of the hearing user's voice signal.
  • 29. The method of claim 28 wherein the hearing user's voice signal is a real time voice signal that is generated substantially simultaneously as a hearing user speaks into a hearing user's communication device.
  • 30. The method of claim 28 wherein the request includes the assisted user dialing a phone number of a communication device used by the hearing user.
  • 31. The method of claim 28 wherein the step of providing the audio of the voice signal to the remote call assistant includes the captioned telephone device transmitting the audio to the relay.
  • 32. The method of claim 28 wherein the captioned telephone device includes a display screen and wherein the step of presenting the captions includes presenting the captions on the display screen.
  • 33. The method of claim 32 wherein the captioned telephone device includes a speaker and wherein the hearing user's voice signal is broadcast via the speaker.
CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATION

This application claims priority from and is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 12/686,688, which is titled “Captioned Telephone Service,” and was filed on Jan. 13, 2010, which is a continuation of U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398 that issued on Feb. 9, 2010, which claimed priority to provisional patent application Ser. No. 60/545,519 filed Feb. 18, 2004, all of which are hereby incorporated by reference as if fully set forth herein. Not applicable.

US Referenced Citations (309)
Number Name Date Kind
3372246 Knuepfer Mar 1968 A
3507997 Weitbrecht Apr 1970 A
3515814 Morgan Jun 1970 A
3585303 Chieffo Jun 1971 A
3598920 Fischer et al. Aug 1971 A
3800089 Reddick Mar 1974 A
3896267 Sachs Jul 1975 A
3959607 Vargo May 1976 A
3976995 Sebestyen Aug 1976 A
4012599 Meyer Mar 1977 A
4039768 O'Maley Aug 1977 A
4126768 Grenzow Nov 1978 A
4151380 Blomeyer et al. Apr 1979 A
4160136 McGough Jul 1979 A
4188665 Nagel et al. Feb 1980 A
4191854 Coles Mar 1980 A
4201887 Burns May 1980 A
4254308 Blomeyer et al. Mar 1981 A
D259348 Sakai et al. May 1981 S
4268721 Nielson et al. May 1981 A
4289931 Baker Sep 1981 A
4302629 Foulkes Nov 1981 A
4307266 Messina Dec 1981 A
4354252 Lamb Oct 1982 A
4415065 Sandstedt Nov 1983 A
4426555 Underkoffler Jan 1984 A
4430726 Kasday Feb 1984 A
D273110 Genaro et al. Mar 1984 S
4451701 Bendig May 1984 A
4471165 DeFino et al. Sep 1984 A
D275857 Moraine Oct 1984 S
4490579 Godoshian Dec 1984 A
4503288 Kessler Mar 1985 A
D278435 Hikawa Apr 1985 S
4524244 Faggin Jun 1985 A
D280099 Topp Aug 1985 S
4533791 Read et al. Aug 1985 A
4568803 Frola Feb 1986 A
4569421 Sandstedt Feb 1986 A
D283421 Brier Apr 1986 S
4625080 Scott Nov 1986 A
RE32365 Sebestyen Mar 1987 E
4650927 James Mar 1987 A
4659876 Sullivan et al. Apr 1987 A
4713808 Gaskill Dec 1987 A
4754474 Feinson Jun 1988 A
D296894 Chen Jul 1988 S
4777469 Engelke Oct 1988 A
4799254 Dayton Jan 1989 A
4815121 Yoshida Mar 1989 A
4817135 Winebaum Mar 1989 A
4839919 Borges Jun 1989 A
4849750 Andros Jul 1989 A
4866778 Baker Sep 1989 A
4868860 Andros Sep 1989 A
4879738 Petro Nov 1989 A
4897868 Engelke Jan 1990 A
D306727 Fritzsche Mar 1990 S
4908866 Goldwasser et al. Mar 1990 A
4918723 Iggulden et al. Apr 1990 A
4926460 Gutman et al. May 1990 A
4951043 Minami Aug 1990 A
4959847 Engelke Sep 1990 A
D312457 Inatomi Nov 1990 S
4995077 Malinowski Feb 1991 A
5025442 Lynk et al. Jun 1991 A
5027406 Roberts Jun 1991 A
5033088 Shipman Jul 1991 A
5051924 Bergeron Sep 1991 A
D322785 Wu Dec 1991 S
5081673 Engelke Jan 1992 A
5086453 Senoo Feb 1992 A
5091906 Reed Feb 1992 A
5095307 Shimura Mar 1992 A
5099507 Mukai Mar 1992 A
5121421 Alheim Jun 1992 A
5128980 Choi Jul 1992 A
5134633 Werner Jul 1992 A
5146502 Davis Sep 1992 A
5163081 Wycherley Nov 1992 A
5192948 Neustein Mar 1993 A
5199077 Wilcox Mar 1993 A
5210689 Baker May 1993 A
5214428 Allen May 1993 A
5216702 Ramsden Jun 1993 A
5249220 Moskowitz Sep 1993 A
5280516 Jang Jan 1994 A
5289523 Vasile Feb 1994 A
5294982 Salomon Mar 1994 A
5307399 Dai Apr 1994 A
5311516 Kuznicki et al. May 1994 A
5318340 Henry Jun 1994 A
5325417 Engelke Jun 1994 A
5327479 Engelke Jul 1994 A
5339358 Danish Aug 1994 A
5343519 Feldman Aug 1994 A
5351288 Engelke Sep 1994 A
D351185 Matsuda et al. Oct 1994 S
5359651 Draganoff Oct 1994 A
5375160 Guidon et al. Dec 1994 A
5377263 Bazemore Dec 1994 A
5393236 Blackmer et al. Feb 1995 A
5396650 Terauchi Mar 1995 A
D357253 Wong Apr 1995 S
5410541 Hotto Apr 1995 A
5423555 Kidrin Jun 1995 A
5424785 Orphan Jun 1995 A
5426706 Wood Jun 1995 A
5432837 Engelke Jul 1995 A
5459458 Richardson Oct 1995 A
5463665 Millios Oct 1995 A
5471470 Sharma et al. Nov 1995 A
D364865 Engelke et al. Dec 1995 S
5475733 Eisdorfer Dec 1995 A
5475798 Handlos Dec 1995 A
5477274 Akiyoshi et al. Dec 1995 A
5487102 Rothschild Jan 1996 A
5487671 Shpiro Jan 1996 A
5497373 Hulen Mar 1996 A
5508754 Orphan Apr 1996 A
5517548 Engelke May 1996 A
5519443 Salomon May 1996 A
5519808 Benton, Jr. May 1996 A
5521960 Aronow May 1996 A
5522089 Kikinis May 1996 A
5537436 Bottoms Jul 1996 A
5559855 Dowens Sep 1996 A
5559856 Dowens Sep 1996 A
5574776 Leuca Nov 1996 A
5574784 LaPadula Nov 1996 A
5581593 Engelke Dec 1996 A
5604786 Engelke Feb 1997 A
D379181 Sawano et al. May 1997 S
5649060 Ellozy Jul 1997 A
5666403 Telibasa Sep 1997 A
5680443 Kasday Oct 1997 A
5687222 McLaughlin Nov 1997 A
5701338 Leyen Dec 1997 A
5710806 Lee Jan 1998 A
5712901 Meermans Jan 1998 A
5724405 Engelke Mar 1998 A
5742504 Meyer et al. Apr 1998 A
5745550 Eisdorfer Apr 1998 A
5751338 Ludwig, Jr. May 1998 A
5787148 August Jul 1998 A
5799273 Mitchell Aug 1998 A
5809112 Ryan Sep 1998 A
5809425 Colwell Sep 1998 A
5815196 Alshawi Sep 1998 A
5826102 Escobar Oct 1998 A
5850627 Gould Dec 1998 A
D405793 Engelke et al. Feb 1999 S
5870709 Bernstein Feb 1999 A
5893034 Hikuma Apr 1999 A
5899976 Rozak May 1999 A
5905476 McLaughlin May 1999 A
5909482 Engelke Jun 1999 A
5915379 Wallace Jun 1999 A
5917888 Giuntoli Jun 1999 A
5926527 Jenkins Jul 1999 A
5940475 Hansen Aug 1999 A
5974116 Engelke Oct 1999 A
5978014 Martin Nov 1999 A
5978654 Colwell et al. Nov 1999 A
5982853 Liebermann Nov 1999 A
5982861 Holloway Nov 1999 A
5991291 Asai Nov 1999 A
5991723 Duffin Nov 1999 A
5995590 Brunet Nov 1999 A
6002749 Hansen Dec 1999 A
6067516 Levay May 2000 A
6075534 VanBuskirk Jun 2000 A
6075841 Engelke Jun 2000 A
6075842 Engelke Jun 2000 A
6100882 Sharman Aug 2000 A
6141341 Jones et al. Oct 2000 A
6141415 Rao Oct 2000 A
6173259 Bijl Jan 2001 B1
6175819 Van Alstine Jan 2001 B1
6181736 McLaughlin Jan 2001 B1
6181778 Ohki et al. Jan 2001 B1
6188429 Martin Feb 2001 B1
6233314 Engelke May 2001 B1
6243684 Stuart Jun 2001 B1
6278772 Bowater Aug 2001 B1
6298326 Feller Oct 2001 B1
6307921 Engelke Oct 2001 B1
6314396 Monkowski Nov 2001 B1
6317716 Braida Nov 2001 B1
6324507 Lewis Nov 2001 B1
6345251 Jansson Feb 2002 B1
6377925 Greene, Jr. Apr 2002 B1
6381472 LaMedica, Jr. Apr 2002 B1
6385586 Dietz May 2002 B1
6389114 Dowens May 2002 B1
6445799 Taenzer Sep 2002 B1
6493426 Engelke Dec 2002 B2
6493447 Goss et al. Dec 2002 B1
6504910 Engelke Jan 2003 B1
6507735 Baker Jan 2003 B1
6510206 Engelke Jan 2003 B2
6549611 Engelke Apr 2003 B2
6549614 Zebryk et al. Apr 2003 B1
6567503 Engelke May 2003 B2
6594346 Engelke Jul 2003 B2
6603835 Engelke Aug 2003 B2
6625259 Hollatz Sep 2003 B1
6661879 Schwartz Dec 2003 B1
6668042 Michaelis Dec 2003 B2
6668044 Schwartz Dec 2003 B1
6701162 Everett Mar 2004 B1
6748053 Engelke Jun 2004 B2
6763089 Feigenbaum Jul 2004 B2
6775360 Davidson Aug 2004 B2
6778824 Wonak et al. Aug 2004 B2
6816468 Cruickshank Nov 2004 B1
6816469 Kung et al. Nov 2004 B1
6816834 Jaroker Nov 2004 B2
6831974 Watson Dec 2004 B1
6850609 Schrage Feb 2005 B1
6865258 Polcyn Mar 2005 B1
6876967 Goto Apr 2005 B2
6885731 Engelke Apr 2005 B2
6894346 Onose May 2005 B2
6934366 Engelke Aug 2005 B2
6934376 McLaughlin Aug 2005 B1
6948066 Hind Sep 2005 B2
6950500 Chaturvedi Sep 2005 B1
6980953 Kanevsky Dec 2005 B1
7003082 Engelke Feb 2006 B2
7006604 Engelke Feb 2006 B2
7016479 Flathers Mar 2006 B2
7035383 O'Neal Apr 2006 B2
7042718 Aoki et al. May 2006 B2
7088832 Cooper Aug 2006 B1
7117152 Mukherji Oct 2006 B1
7117438 Wallace Oct 2006 B2
7142642 McClelland Nov 2006 B2
7142643 Brooksby Nov 2006 B2
7164753 Engelke Jan 2007 B2
7199787 Lee et al. Apr 2007 B2
7221405 Basson May 2007 B2
7233655 Gailey Jun 2007 B2
7287009 Liebermann Oct 2007 B1
7295663 McLaughlin Nov 2007 B2
7313231 Reid Dec 2007 B2
7315612 McClelland Jan 2008 B2
7319740 Engelke Jan 2008 B2
7363006 Mooney Apr 2008 B2
7406413 Geppert Jul 2008 B2
7430283 Steel, Jr. Sep 2008 B2
7555104 Engelke Jun 2009 B2
7573985 McClelland Aug 2009 B2
7606718 Cloran Oct 2009 B2
7660398 Engelke Feb 2010 B2
7747434 Flanagan et al. Jun 2010 B2
7792701 Basson Sep 2010 B2
7848358 LaDue Dec 2010 B2
7881441 Engelke et al. Feb 2011 B2
7904113 Ozluturk et al. Mar 2011 B2
8213578 Engleke Jul 2012 B2
8259920 Abramson et al. Sep 2012 B2
8379801 Romriell Feb 2013 B2
8416925 Engelke et al. Apr 2013 B2
8908838 Engelke Dec 2014 B2
8917821 Engelke et al. Dec 2014 B2
8917822 Engelke et al. Dec 2014 B2
9355611 Wang et al. May 2016 B1
20010005825 Engelke et al. Jun 2001 A1
20020007275 Goto et al. Jan 2002 A1
20020055351 Elsey et al. May 2002 A1
20020085685 Engelke et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020085703 Proctor Jul 2002 A1
20020094800 Trop et al. Jul 2002 A1
20020101537 Basson et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020103008 Rahn et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020119800 Jaggers et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020122550 Noplock Sep 2002 A1
20020178001 Balluff et al. Nov 2002 A1
20040066926 Brockbank et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040083105 Jaroker Apr 2004 A1
20040143430 Said et al. Jul 2004 A1
20050094776 Haldeman et al. May 2005 A1
20050094777 McClelland May 2005 A1
20050144012 Afrashteh et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050180553 Moore Aug 2005 A1
20050183109 Basson et al. Aug 2005 A1
20050225628 Antoniou Oct 2005 A1
20050226394 Engelke et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050226398 Bojeun Oct 2005 A1
20050232169 McLaughlin et al. Oct 2005 A1
20050277431 White Dec 2005 A1
20060105712 Glass et al. May 2006 A1
20060133583 Brooksby Jun 2006 A1
20060140354 Engelke Jun 2006 A1
20060285652 McClelland et al. Dec 2006 A1
20060285662 Yin et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070024583 Gettemy et al. Feb 2007 A1
20070036282 Engelke et al. Feb 2007 A1
20080043936 Liebermann Feb 2008 A1
20080152093 Engleke et al. Jun 2008 A1
20080187108 Engelke et al. Aug 2008 A1
20100063815 Cloran et al. Mar 2010 A1
20110087491 Wittenstein et al. Apr 2011 A1
20110123003 Romriell et al. May 2011 A1
20120250836 Engleke et al. Oct 2012 A1
20120250837 Engleke et al. Oct 2012 A1
20130308763 Engleke et al. Nov 2013 A1
20140341359 Engelke Nov 2014 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (46)
Number Date Country
2647097 Apr 1978 DE
2749923 May 1979 DE
3410619 Oct 1985 DE
3632233 Apr 1988 DE
10328884 Feb 2005 DE
0016281 Oct 1980 EP
0029246 May 1981 EP
0651372 May 1995 EP
0655158 May 1995 EP
0664636 Jul 1995 EP
0683483 Nov 1995 EP
1039733 Sep 2000 EP
1330046 Jul 2003 EP
1486949 Dec 2004 EP
2403697 Apr 1979 FR
2432805 Feb 1980 FR
2538978 Jul 1984 FR
2183880 Jun 1987 GB
2285895 Jul 1995 GB
2327173 Jan 1999 GB
2335109 Sep 1999 GB
2339363 Jan 2000 GB
2334177 Dec 2002 GB
55044283 Mar 1980 JP
57055649 Apr 1982 JP
58134568 Aug 1983 JP
60259058 Dec 1985 JP
63198466 Aug 1988 JP
H04248596 Sep 1992 JP
20050004503 Dec 2005 KR
9323947 Nov 1993 WO
9405006 Mar 1994 WO
9500946 Jan 1995 WO
9519086 Jul 1995 WO
9839901 Sep 1998 WO
9913634 Mar 1999 WO
9952237 Oct 1999 WO
0049601 Aug 2000 WO
0155914 Aug 2001 WO
0158165 Aug 2001 WO
0180079 Oct 2001 WO
02077971 Oct 2002 WO
03026265 Mar 2003 WO
03030018 Apr 2003 WO
03071774 Aug 2003 WO
2005081511 Sep 2005 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (621)
Entry
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,679 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346), Jun. 5, 2002.
Applicant, Response (to Jun. 5, 2002 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,679 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346), Dec. 4, 2002.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,679 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346), Feb. 19, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/789,120 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,567,503), Jun. 17, 2002.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Jun. 17, 2002 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 09/789,120 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,567,503), Oct. 19, 2002.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/789,120 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,567,503), Dec. 30, 2002.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,372,061, Apr. 26, 2004.
Applicant, Response to Apr. 26, 2004 Official Action, Application No. CA 2,372,061, Oct. 26, 2004.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,372,061, May 26, 2005.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,520,594, Mar. 7, 2006.
Applicant, Response to Mar. 7, 2006 Office Action, Application No. CA 2,520,594, Sep. 6, 2006.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,520,594, Nov. 27, 2006.
Applicant, Response to Nov. 27, 2006 Office Action, Application No. CA 2,520,594, May 25, 2007.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Combined Search and Examination Report, Application No. GB 0203898.2, Aug. 30, 2002.
Applicant, Response to Aug. 30, 2002 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0203898.2, Oct. 28, 2002.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0203898.2, Jan. 21, 2003.
Applicant, Response to Jan. 21, 2003 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0203898.2, Jul. 15, 2003.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Combined Search and Examination Report, Application No. GB 0225275.7, Jan. 20, 2003.
Applicant, Response to Jan. 20, 2003 Letter, Application No. GB 0225275.7, Jul. 14, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,413 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,707), Mar. 23, 2004.
Applicant, Response to Restriction Requirement, U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,413 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,707), Apr. 9, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,413 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,707), May 7, 2004.
Applicant, Response to May 7, 2004 Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,413 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,707), Aug. 9, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, Examiner's Amendment and Interview Summary, U.S. Appl. No. 09/790,413 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,882,707), Dec. 10, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/336,950, Jun. 2, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/391,141 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441), Mar. 9, 2010.
Applicant, First Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/391,141 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441), Jun. 9, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/391,141 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441), Sep. 21, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 11/391,141 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441), Dec. 7, 2010.
European Patent Office, Communication, Application No. EP 06785768.0, Feb. 7, 2008.
Applicant, Reply to Feb. 7, 2008 Communication, Application No. EP 06785768.0, Mar. 12, 2008.
European Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. EP 06785768.0, Aug. 9, 2010.
Applicant, Response to Aug. 9, 2010 Communication, Application No. EP 06785768.0, Dec. 20, 2010.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2006/025236, Oct. 2, 2006.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2006/025236, Jan. 9, 2008.
Republic of the Philippines Intellectual Property Office, Findings/Action of Examiner, Application No. PH 1-2007-502940, Oct. 29, 2010.
Applicant, Response to Oct. 29, 2010 Office Action, Application No. PH 1-2007-502940, Dec. 29, 2010.
IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. AU 2006263680, Jun. 29, 2009.
Applicant, Response to Jun. 29, 2009 Examination Report, Application No. AU 2006263680, Jun. 17, 2010.
IP Australia, Examiner's Report No. 2, Application No. AU 2006263680, Jun. 22, 2010.
Applicant, Response to Jun. 22, 2010 Examination Report, Application No. AU 2006263680, Jul. 16, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,114 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104), May 21, 2007.
Applicant, Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,114 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104), Jul. 23, 2007.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,114 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104), Sep. 15, 2008.
Applicant, Request for Continued Examination and Submission of Supplemental Information Disclosure Statement, U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,114, (U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104), Dec. 15, 2008.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/361,114 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104), Feb. 25, 2009.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/876,340 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,504,910), Aug. 13, 2002.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US02/18156, Oct. 29, 2002.
Choi, et al., Employing Speech Recognition Through Common Telephone Equipment, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Dec. 1995, pp. 355-356.
Choi, et al., Splitting and Routing Audio Signals in Systems with Speech Recognition, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Dec. 1995, 38(12):503-504.
Cook, A First Course in Digital Electronics, Published by Prentice-Hall, Inc., 1999, pp. 692-693.
De Gennaro, et al., (Cellular) Telephone Steno Captioning Service, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Jul. 1992, pp. 346-349.
Goodrich, et al., Engineering Education for Students with Disabilities: Technology, Research and Support, In Frontiers in Education Conference, 1993, 23rd Annual Conference ‘Engineering Education: Renewing America's Technology’ Proceedings, IEEE, pp. 92-97.
IBM, Software Verification of Microcode Transfer Using Cyclic Redundancy Code Algorithm, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Dec. 1988, 31(7):149-153.
IBM, Use of Cyclic Redundancy Code for Testing ROM and RAM in a Writeable Control Store, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, Nov. 1990, 33(6A):219-220.
Karjalainen, et al., Applications for the Hearing-Impaired: Evaluation of Finnish Phoneme Recognition Methods, Eurospeech, 1997, 4 pages.
Kitai, et al., Trends of ASR and Its Applications in Japan, Third IEEE Workshop on Interactive Voice Technology for Telecommunications Applications, 1996, pp. 21-24.
Kukich, Spelling Correction for the Telecommunications Network for the Deaf, Communications of the ACM, 1992, 35 (5):80-90.
Makhoul, et al., State of the Art in Continuous Speech Recognition, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92:9956-9963.
Microchip Technology, Inc., MCRF250, Contactless Programmable Passive RFID Device With Anti-Collision, 1998, DS21267C, pp. 1-12.
Oberteuffer, Commercial Applications of Speech Interface Technology: An Industry at the Threshold, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, 1995, 92:10007-10010.
Osman-Allu, Telecommunication Interfaces for Deaf People, IEE Colloquium on Special Needs and the Interface, IET, 1993, pp. 811-814.
Paul, et al., The Design for the Wall Street Journal-based CSR Corpus, Proceedings of the Workshop on Speech and Natural Language, Association for Computational Linguistics, 1992, pp. 357-362.
Rabiner, et al., Fundamentals of Speech Recognition, Copyright 1993 by AT&T, Published by Prentice Hall PTR, pp. 1, 6-9, 284-285, 482-488.
Rabiner, Applications of Speech Recognition in the Area of Telecommunications, IEEE Workshop on Automatic Speech Recognition and Understanding, IEEE, 1997, pp. 501-510.
Schmitt, et al., An Experimental Study of Synthesized Speech Intelligibility Using Text Created by Telecommunication Device for the Deaf (TDD) Users, IEEE Global Telecommunications Conference & Exhibition, 1990, pp. 996-999.
Scott, Understanding Cyclic Redundancy Check, ACI Technical Support, Technical Note 99-11, 1999, 13 pages.
Seltzer, et al., Expediting the Turnaround of Radiology Reports in a Teaching Hospital Setting, AJR, 1997, 168:889-893.
Wactlar, et al., Informedia(TM): News-On-Demand Experiments in Speech Recognition, Proceedings of ARPA Speech Recognition Workshop, 1996, pp. 18-21.
Wegmann, Final Technical Report on Phase I SBIR Study on “Semi-Automated Speech Transcription System” at Dragon Systems, Advanced Research Projects Agency Order No. 5916, 1994, 21 pages.
Williams, A Painless Guide to CRC Error Detection Algorithms, 1993, 35 pages.
Yamamoto, et al., Special Session (New Developments in Voice Recognition) (Invited Presentation), New Applications of Voice Recognition, Proceedings of the Acoustical Society of Japan, Spring 1996 Research Presentation Conference, pp. 33-36.
Young, A Review of Large-Vocabulary Continuous-Speech Recognition, IEEE Signal Processing Magazine, 1996, pp. 45-57.
Cyclic Redundancy Check, Source: http://utopia.knoware.nl/users/eprebel/Communication/CRC/index.html, 1998, 4 pages.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 08/396,554, Telephone for the Deaf and Method of Using Same, filed Mar. 1, 1995, 121 pages.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 09/599,347, filed Jun. 22, 2000, 19 pages.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 10/099,824, Graphic User Interface for a Patient Ventilator, filed Mar. 15, 2002, 3 pages.
U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 60/041,458, TTY Modem System, filed Mar. 25, 1997, 32 pages.
The Patent Office, Examination Report, Apr. 15, 2002, Application No. GB 9908312.3, 2 pages.
Applicant, Response to Apr. 15, 2002 Examination Report, Oct. 14, 2002, Application No. GB 9908312.3, 2 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 65 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 39 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 67 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-15 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 67 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 7-11 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 67 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-8 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 66 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 51 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1 and 2 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 30, 2013, 67 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 6 and 8 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., May 19, 2014, 67 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00550, U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082 B2, Mar. 5, 2014, 13 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00543, U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Mar. 5, 2014, 16 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00540, U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Mar. 5, 2014, 17 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00545, U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Mar. 5, 2014, 21 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00541, U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Mar. 5, 2014, 32 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00544, U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Mar. 5, 2014, 22 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00542, U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Mar. 5, 2014, 17 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00549, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835 B2, Mar. 5, 2014, 26 pages.
Ultratec Inc. and Captel Inc., Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC , Civil Action No. 13-346, May 17, 2013, 13 pages.
Ultratec Inc. and Captel Inc., Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 13-346, Jul. 31, 2013, 16 pages.
Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Defendants' Amended Answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Declaratory Judgment and Counterclaims, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 13-346, Aug. 14, 2013, 71 pages.
Ultratec Inc. and Captel Inc., Plaintiffs' Answer to Defendants' Amended Counterclaims, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 13-346, Aug. 28, 2013, 26 pages.
Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Invalidity Contentions, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 13-346, Sep. 23, 2013, 31 pages.
Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Exhibits to Invalidity Contentions, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 13-346, Sep. 23, 2013, 587 pages.
Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Defendants' Answer to Plaintiffs' Original Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 14-66, Feb. 24, 2014, 41 pages.
Ultratec Inc. and Captel Inc., Plaintiffs' Answer to Defendants' Counterclaims, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 14-CV-66, Mar. 17, 2014, 14 pages.
Ultratec Inc. and Captel Inc., Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications Inc. and CaptionCall LLC, Civil Action No. 3-14-CV-66-BBC, Mar. 26, 2014, 11 pages.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,419,150, Sep. 17, 2009.
Applicant, Response to Sep. 17, 2009 Official Action, Application No. CA 2,419,150, Mar. 12, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/938,194 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835), Jul. 5, 2002.
Applicant, Response (to Jul. 5, 2002 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 09/938,194 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835), Jan. 6, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/938,194 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835), Mar. 18, 2003.
IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. AU 2002313798, Oct. 27, 2006.
Applicant, Response to Oct. 27, 2006 Examination Report, Application No. AU 2002313798, Feb. 9, 2007.
IP Australia, Notice of Acceptance, Application No. AU 2002313798, Apr. 2, 2007.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,458,372, Oct. 15, 2009.
Applicant, Response to Oct. 15, 2009 Official Action, Application No. CA 2,458,372, Apr. 15, 2010.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,458,372, Jul. 27, 2010.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0403994.7, May 28, 2004.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US02/26815, Jan. 3, 2003.
PCT Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US02/26815, Apr. 29, 2003.
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report, Application No. PCT/US02/26815, Apr. 14, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 09/956,310 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,206), Aug. 19, 2002.
Applicant, Applicants' Comments on Examiner's Reason for Allowance (dated Aug. 19, 2002), U.S. Appl. No. 09/956,310 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,510,206), Nov. 19, 2002.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Combined Search and Examination Report, Application No. GB 0406768.2 (Patent No. GB 2396774), Apr. 27, 2004.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US01/29130, Mar. 1, 2003.
PCT International Preliminary Examination Report, Application No. PCT/US01/29130, Mar. 17, 2003.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0306458.1, Sep. 17, 2003.
Applicant, Response to Sep. 17, 2003 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0306458.1, Mar. 16, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/977,842 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,611), Apr. 23, 2002.
Applicant, Response (to Apr. 23, 2002 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 09/977,842 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,611), Oct. 23, 2002.
Applicant, Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 09/977,842 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,611), Oct. 23, 2002.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/977,842 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,549,611), Nov. 15, 2002.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/412,118, Nov. 3, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/316,215 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366), Jul. 13, 2004.
Applicant, Response (to Jul. 13, 2004 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 10/316,215 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366), Jan. 13, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/316,215 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366), Apr. 18, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/348,466 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,053), Jul. 3, 2003.
Applicant, Response (to Jul. 3, 2003 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 10/348,466 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,053), Jan. 5, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/348,466 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,748,053), Jan. 27, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Jul. 1, 2005.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Jul. 1, 2005 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Sep. 14, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Nov. 17, 2005.
Applicant, Response (to Nov. 17, 2005 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Jan. 18, 2006.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Apr. 19, 2006.
Applicant, Response (to Apr. 19, 2006 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Jun. 13, 2006.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/436,650 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,164,753), Sep. 15, 2006.
IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. AU 2004239790, May 14, 2009.
Applicant, Response (to May 14, 2009 Examination Report), Application No. AU 2004239790, May 21, 2010.
Government of India the Patent Office, First Examination Report, Application No. 2262/KOLNP/2005, Apr. 29, 2008.
Applicant, Response to Apr. 29, 2008 Official Letter, Application No. 2262/KOLNP/2005, May 5, 2008.
Applicant, Response to Apr. 29, 2008 First Examination Report, Application No. 2262/KOLNP/2005, Oct. 23, 2008.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2004/014991, Dec. 1, 2005.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2004/014991, Dec. 29, 2004.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/946,538 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,841), Sep. 18, 1998.
Applicant, First Amendment (Response to Sep. 18, 1998 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/946,538 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,841), Jan. 15, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/946,538 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,841), Mar. 26, 1999.
Applicant, Response to Mar. 26, 1999 Office Action and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 08/946,538 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,841), Jul. 20, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability and Examiner's Amendment and Statement of Reasons for Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 08/946,538 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,841), Aug. 16, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/034,076 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,842), Apr. 6, 1999.
Applicant, Response to Apr. 6, 1999 Office Action and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 09/034,076 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,842), Jul. 21, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 09/034,076 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,075,842), Jan. 7, 2000.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability and Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/108,790 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,116), May 11, 1999.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. CA 2,268,383, May 10, 2007.
Applicant, Response to May 10, 2007 Office Action, Application No. CA 2,268,383, Nov. 9, 2007.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 9908310.7 (Patent No. GB 2339363), Jan. 25, 2003.
Applicant, Response to United Kingdom Patent Office Jan. 25, 2003 Report, Application No. GB 9908310.7 (Patent No. GB 2339363), Aug. 26, 2003.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 9908310.7 (Patent No. GB 2339363), Sep. 23, 2003.
Applicant, Response to United Kingdom Patent Office Sep. 23, 2003 Report, Application No. GB 9908310.7 (Patent No. GB 2339363), Nov. 17, 2003.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 9908310.7 (Patent No. GB 2339363), Dec. 16, 2003.
Applicant, Response to United Kingdom Patent Office Dec. 16, 2003 Report, Application No. GB 9908310.7 (Patent No. GB 2339363), Dec. 30, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/572,819 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,307,921), Oct. 25, 2000.
Applicant, Response (to Oct. 25, 2000 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimers, U.S. Appl. No. 09/572,819 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,307,921), Apr. 25, 2001.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 09/572,819 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,307,921), Jun. 4, 2001.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,856 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,425), Aug. 28, 1996.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Aug. 18, 1996 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,856 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,425), Feb. 28, 1997.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,856 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,425), May 28, 1997.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to May 28, 1997 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,856 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,425), Nov. 26, 1997.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Statement of Reasons for Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,856 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,809,425), Dec. 23, 1997.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US96/09492, Sep. 4, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/367,563, Aug. 2, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/153,771, Aug. 3, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,476, Jan. 24, 2011.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Jan. 24, 2011 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimers, U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,476, May 23, 2011.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,476, Jun. 23, 2011.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,458,372, May 16, 2011.
Intellectual Property Philippines, Official Action, Application No. PH 12007502940, Jun. 6, 2011.
Applicant, Response to Jun. 6, 2011 Office Action, Application No. PH 12007502940, Aug. 4, 2011.
UK Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Aug. 15, 2008.
UK Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Dec. 17, 2008.
Applicant, Response to Dec. 17, 2008 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Feb. 16, 2009.
European Patent Office, Communication, Application No. EP 04761001.9, Jun. 30, 2011.
Cooper, R. J., Break Feature for Half Duplex Modem, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin, 1975, 17(8):2386-2387.
Gopalakrishnan et al., Effective Set Up for Performing Phone Conversations by the Hearing Impaired, 1991, IBM Technical Disclosure Bulletin 34(7B):423-426.
Moskowitz, Telocator Alphanumeric Protocol (TAP), Version 1.8, Feb. 4, 1997.
Smith, Ascii to Baudot, Radio Electronics Magazine, Mar. 1976, pp. 51-58.
Supnik, et al., Can You Hear Me?—DragonDictate for Windows Minces Words for Your Office, Originally Published in Computer Counselor Column of the May 1995 Issue of the Los Angeles Lawyer Magazine, http://www.supnik.com/voice.htm, accessed Aug. 7, 2012.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2009/040523, Apr. 11, 2009.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 12/686,688, Nov. 8, 2012.
Applicant, First Amendment (in Response to United States Patent and Trademark Office Nov. 8, 2012 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 12/686,688, Feb. 7, 2013.
Applicant, Response to Apr. 10, 2012, Official Action, Application No. CA 2,556,933, Jul. 12, 2012.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US93/04753, Aug. 20, 1993.
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report, Application No. EP 93911360 (Patent No. EP 0596078), Mar. 27, 1995.
European Patent Office, Communication, Application No. EP 93911360.1 (Patent No. EP 0596078), Jul. 10, 1998.
Applicant, Response to Jul. 10, 1998 Communication, Application No. EP 93911360.1 (Patent No. EP 0596078), Jan. 20, 1999.
European Patent Office, Communication, Application No. EP 93911360.1 (Patent No. EP 0596078), Jun. 16, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, Examiner's Amendment, Examiner Interview Summary Record, U.S. Appl. No. 08/129,894 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,432,837), Dec. 29, 1994.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/155,061 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,517,548), Dec. 22, 1994.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Dec. 22, 1994 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/155,061 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,517,548), Jun. 22, 1995.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 08/155,061 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,517,548), Aug. 8, 1995.
European Patent Office, Supplementary European Search Report, Application No. EP 93911361.9 (Patent No. EP 0596079), Mar. 27, 1995.
European Patent Office, Communication, Application No. EP 93911361.9 (Patent No. EP 0596079), Jul. 10, 1998.
Applicant, Response to Jul. 10, 1998 Communication, Application No. EP 93911361.9 (Patent No. EP 0596079), Jan. 20, 1999.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US93/04760, Aug. 13, 1993.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,552, May 21, 1993.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Sep. 30, 1997.
Applicant, Response to Sep. 30, 1997 First Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Oct. 20, 1997.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Jan. 5, 1998.
Applicant, Amendment After Final (Jan. 5, 1998 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Feb. 6, 1998.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Feb. 20, 1998.
Applicant, Appellant's Brief on Appeal, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, May 29, 1998.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Answer, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Aug. 18, 1998.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision on Appeal, U.S. Appl. No. 08/802,053, Oct. 19, 2001.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Jun. 21, 1995.
Applicant, First Amendment (Response to Jun. 21, 1995 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Sep. 8, 1995.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Dec. 14, 1995.
Applicant, Second Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Jun. 14, 1996.
Applicant, Third Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Jul. 31, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Aug. 7, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowability and Examiner's Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 08/258,044 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,604,786), Nov. 18, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 08/369,205 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,581,593), Nov. 2, 1995.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Nov. 2, 1995 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/369,205 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,581,593), Feb. 5, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, Interview Summary, and Examiner's Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 08/369,205 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,581,593), May 15, 1996.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US96/00282, Apr. 9, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,852 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,654), Sep. 5, 1996.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Sep. 5, 1996 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,852 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,654), Nov. 26, 1997.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,852 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,654), Oct. 16, 1998.
Applicant, Response (to Oct. 16, 1998 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,852 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,654), Apr. 16, 1999.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 08/481,852 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,978,654), May 5, 1999.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US96/09391, Aug. 27, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/288,420 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314), Feb. 25, 2000.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Feb. 25, 2000 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 09/288,420 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314), Aug. 25, 2000.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/288,420 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314), Dec. 5, 2000.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,337 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426), Dec. 14, 2001.
Applicant, Response to Dec. 14, 2001 Office Action and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,337 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426), Jun. 14, 2002.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Statement of Reasons for Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 09/783,337 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426), Jul. 25, 2002.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0319142.6 (Patent No. GB 2389993), Jan. 13, 2004.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,438,412, May 20, 2009.
Applicant, Response to May 20, 2009 Official Action, Application No. CA 2,438,412, Nov. 18, 2009.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,438,412, Apr. 30, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, Examiner's Amendment, Examiner Interview Summary Record, U.S. Appl. No. 07/074,625 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,777,469), May 20, 1988.
Canadian Patent Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 571,452 (U.S. Pat. No. 1,301,388), Jan. 29, 1991.
Applicant, Restoration and Amendment, Application No. CA 571,452 (U.S. Pat. No. 1,301,388), Aug. 8, 1991.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/224,118 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,868), Jun. 8, 1989.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Jun. 8, 1989 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 07/224,118 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,868), Jun. 19, 1989.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 07/224,118 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,897,868), Aug. 29, 1989.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/334,003 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,847), Oct. 10, 1989.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Oct. 10, 1989 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 07/334,003 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,847), Jan. 10, 1990.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 07/334,003 (U.S. Pat. No. 4,959,847), Mar. 27, 1990.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examiner's Search Report, Application No. GB 9006994.9 (Patent No. GB 2,231,468), Jul. 12, 1990.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. GB 9006994.9 (Patent No. GB 2,231,468), Dec. 16, 1992.
Applicant, Response to Dec. 16, 1992 Official Letter, Application No. GB 9006994.9 (Patent No. GB 2,231,468), Jun. 11, 1993.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. CA 2,013,617, Jul. 28, 2000.
Applicant, Response to Jul. 28, 2000 Official Action, Application No. CA 2,013,617, Nov. 28, 2000.
Applicant, Information Letter, Application No. CA 2,013,617, Feb. 1, 2001.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,013,617, Mar. 23, 2001.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/842,943 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,288), Oct. 22, 1993.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Oct. 22, 1993 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 07/842,943 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,288), Jan. 13, 1994.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/842,943 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,288), Mar. 30, 1994.
Applicant, Response to Mar. 30, 1994 Final Rejection, U.S. Appl. No. 07/842,943 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,288), Apr. 12, 1994.
Applicant, Supplemental Response to Final Rejection and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 07/842,943 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,288), Apr. 28, 1994.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 07/842,943 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,351,288), Jun. 6, 1994.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, May 3, 1989.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to May 3, 1989 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, Aug. 3, 1989.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, Oct. 16, 1989.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Oct. 16, 1989 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, Apr. 16, 1990.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Communication, U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, Jul. 16, 1990.
Applicant, Response After Final, U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, Oct. 16, 1990.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Advisory Action, U.S. Appl. No. 07/255,357, Nov. 6, 1990.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Action, U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,553 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,417), May 21, 1993.
Applicant, First Amendment (Response to May 21, 1993 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,553 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,417), Oct. 21, 1993.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,553 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,325,417), Jan. 4, 1994.
European Patent Office, Communication, Application No. EP 93911359.3 (Patent No. EP 0608389), Jul. 10, 1998.
Applicant, Response to Jul. 10, 1998 Communication, Application No. EP 93911359.3 (Patent No. EP 0608389), Jan. 19, 1999.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,113,841, Jun. 10, 2002.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US93/04751, Aug. 18, 1993.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Action, U.S. Appl. No. 29/024,266 (U.S. Pat. No. D. 364,865), Mar. 30, 1995.
Applicant, Response to First Office Action, U.S. Appl. No. 29/024,266 (U.S. Pat. No. D. 364,865), May 16, 1995.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 29/024,266 (U.S. Pat. No. D. 364,865), Jun. 7, 1995.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 29/076,383 (U.S. Pat. No. D. 405,793), Apr. 14, 1998.
Applicant, First Amendment (Response to Apr. 14, 1998 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 29/076,383 (U.S. Pat. No. D. 405,793), Jul. 14, 1998.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Examiner's Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 29/076,383 (U.S. Pat. No. D. 405,793), Aug. 10, 1998.
Applicant, Preliminary Response to United States Patent and Trademark Office, U.S. Appl. No. 07/616,720 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,081,673), Dec. 31, 1990.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 07/616,720 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,081,673), Mar. 7, 1991.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Patent No. CA 1320602, Oct. 27, 1992.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Examiner's Action, U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,642 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,327,479), May 19, 1993.
Applicant, First Amendment (Response to May 19, 1993 Office Action), Application No. 07/886,642 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,327,479), Oct. 19, 1993.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance and Examiner Interview Summary Record, U.S. Appl. No. 07/886,642 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,327,479), Jan. 5, 1994.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,113,839, Jun. 18, 2002.
Intellectual Property Philippines, Official Action, Application No. PH 12005502024, Aug. 10, 2007.
Applicant, Response to Aug. 10, 2007 Official Action, Application No. PH 12005502024, Oct. 3, 2007.
Intellectual Property Philippines, Official Action, Application No. PH 12005502024, Oct. 17, 2007.
Applicant, Response to Oct. 17, 2007 Official Action, Application No. PH 12005502024, Dec. 11, 2007.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/619,040 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604), Dec. 2, 2004.
Applicant, Response (to Dec. 2, 2004 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 10/619,040 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604), Jun. 2, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 10/619,040 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604), Sep. 16, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowability, Examiner's Amendment and Interview Summary, U.S. Appl. No. 10/628,193 (U.S. Pat. No. 6,885,731), Jan. 31, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 10/634,965 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082), Jul. 16, 2004.
Applicant, Response (to Jul. 16, 2004 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 10/634,965 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082), Jan. 14, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Supplemental Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 10/634,965 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082), Nov. 9, 2005.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Apr. 1, 2008.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Apr. 1, 2008 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Jul. 1, 2008.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Nov. 4, 2008.
Applicant, Request for Continued Examination and Interview Summary, U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Jan. 22, 2009.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Mar. 25, 2009.
Applicant, Amendment, U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Jun. 22, 2009.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398), Sep. 25, 2009.
Applicant, Request for Recalculation of Patent Term Adjustment in View of Wyeth, U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398, (U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682), Feb. 25, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Decision on Request for Recalculation of Patent Term Adjustment in View of Wyeth and Notice of Intent to Issue Certificate of Correction, U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398 (U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682), Apr. 20, 2010.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Certificate of Correction, U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398 (U.S. Appl. No. 11/061,682), Nov. 30, 2010.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, Application No. PCT/US2005/005149, May 24, 2005.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, Application No. PCT/US2005/005149, Aug. 31, 2006.
UK Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Jan. 23, 2008.
Applicant, Response to Jan. 23, 2008 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Jul. 22, 2008.
UK Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Aug. 15, 2008.
Applicant, Response to Aug. 15, 2008 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0617585.5, Dec. 9, 2008.
UK Intellectual Property Office, Combined Search and Examination Report, Application No. GB 0813502.2, Aug. 15, 2008.
Applicant, Response to Aug. 15, 2008 Official Letter, Application No. GB 0813502.2, Dec. 9, 2008.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 11/257,703 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740), May 3, 2007.
Applicant, Amendment and Terminal Disclaimers (Response to May 3, 2007 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 11/257,703 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740), Jul. 26, 2007.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/257,703 (U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740), Aug. 23, 2007.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Jul. 20, 1995.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Jul. 20, 1995 Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Jan. 22, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Apr. 16, 1996.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Apr. 16, 1996 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Oct. 16, 1996.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Jan. 15, 1997.
Applicant, Response After Final (Response to Jan. 15, 1997 Office Action) and Terminal Disclaimer, U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Jul. 15, 1997.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 08/217,518 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,724,405), Aug. 19, 1997.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Search Report, Application No. GB 9804556.0 (Patent No. GB 2335109), Aug. 12, 1998.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 9804556.0 (Patent No. GB 2335109), Sep. 27, 2002.
Applicant, Response to United Kingdom Patent Office Sep. 27, 2002 Examination Report, Application No. GB 9804556.0 (Patent No. GB 2335109), Mar. 26, 2003.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowability, U.S. Appl. No. 08/925,558 (U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482), Oct. 27, 1998.
United Kingdom Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. GB 9908312.3 (Patent No. GB 2334177), Apr. 15, 2002.
Applicant, Response to United Kingdom Patent Office Apr. 15, 2002 Examination Report, Application No. GB 9908312.3 (Patent No. GB 2334177), Oct. 14, 2002.
PCT International Search Report, Application No. PCT/US98/18650, Nov. 6, 1998.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examination Report, Application No. CA 2,268,582, Feb. 22, 2007.
Applicant, Amendment/Remarks Following Feb. 22, 2007 Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,268,582, Aug. 22, 2007.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, Jan. 28, 2015, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,080, Feb. 27, 2015, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, Sep. 19, 2014, 8 pages.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Sep. 19, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, Sep. 24, 2014, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, Oct. 10, 2014, 6 pages.
Applicant, Response (Response to Oct. 10, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, Oct. 17, 2014, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,651, Oct. 16, 2014, 5 pages.
Applicant, Response (Response to Oct. 16, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,651, Oct. 17, 2014, 3 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2014-00780, Apr. 20, 2015, 30 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2014-00780, Dec. 1, 2015, 56 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition Under 37 C.F.R. 42.107, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2015-00636, Jun. 9, 2015, 66 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision on Institution, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2015-00636, Sep. 8, 2015, 20pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.107, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2015-00636, Nov. 23, 2015, 65pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response to Petition Under 37 C.F.R. 42.107, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., case IPR 2015-00637, Jun. 9, 2015, 65 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision on Institution, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2015-00637, Sep. 8, 2015, 25 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.107, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR 2015-00637, Nov. 23, 2015, 65 pages.
Applicant, Response (Response to Jan. 28, 2015, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, Jul. 28, 2015, 37 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, Aug. 18, 2015, 9 pages.
Applicant, Response (Response to Feb. 27, 2015, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,080, Aug. 27, 2015, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/506,080, Oct. 8, 2015, 16 pages.
Opinion and Order Regarding Summary Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Aug. 28, 2014.
Additional Opinion and Order Regarding Summary Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Aug. 28, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Claim Construction, Daubert, Motions in Limine, and Secondary Considerations of Nonobviousness, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Sep. 29, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Motions in Limine and Correcting Errors in Summary Judgment Order, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 1, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Induced Infringement, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 1, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Motions in Limine, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 3, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Motions in Limine, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 8, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Daubert Motions of Secondary Considerations, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Nisconsin, Oct. 10, 2014.
Joint Stipulation of Dismissal With Prejudice of Claims and Counterclaims Relating to Claims 1-6 of the '835 Patent and Claim 10 of the '578 Patent, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 13, 2014.
Stipulation Regarding Infringement of Claim 11 of the '578 Patent, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 13, 2014.
Opinion and Order Regarding Motion for Claims Construction, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 21, 2014.
Special Verdict Regarding Liability, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 23, 2014.
Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Nov. 3, 2014.
Defendants' Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment of Non-Infringement as a Matter of Law and Rule 59 Motion for New Trial, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Nov. 26, 2014.
Defendants' Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment of Invalidity (Anticipation) and Alternative Rule 59 Motion for New Trial on 4nticipation and Brief in Support, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Dec. 1, 2014.
Defendants' Rule 59 Motion for New Trial and Brief in Support, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., at al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Dec. 1, 2014.
Defendants' Rule 50(b) Motion for Judgment of Invalidity Obviousness and Alternative Rule 59 Motion for New Trial on Obviousness and Brief in Support, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Dec. 1, 2014 (Redacted).
Opinion and Order Regarding Stay of Litigation, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-cv-00346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 13, 2015.
Defendants' Answer to Plaintiffs' Second Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 9, 2014.
Defendants' Notion of Motion and Motion for Summary Judgment Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Mar. 27, 2015.
Brief No. 1 in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Indefiniteness and Claim Construction), Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 11, 2015 (Redacted).
Brief No. 2 in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (Non-Infringement and Invalidity Under 35 USC 102 and 103), Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc, et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 11, 2015 (Redacted).
Brief No. 3 in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (No Injunction, No Willful Infringement, No Indirect Infringement, and No Infringement of Claims 1-3 of the '398 Patent), Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Nisconsin, May 11, 2015 (Redacted).
Reply in Support of Brief No. 3 in Support of Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment (No Injunction, No Willful Infringement, No Indirect Infringement, and No Infringement of Claims 1-3 of the '398 Patent), Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Jun. 24, 2015 (Redacted).
Claim Construction and Summary Judgment Opinion and Order, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Sep. 11, 2015.
Final Pretrial Conference and Order, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Sep. 21, 2015.
Order of Plaintiffs' Motion in Limine 16, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Sep. 22, 2015.
Order, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 6, 2015.
Special Verdict Form—Liability, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 6, 2015.
Judgment in a Civil Case, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00066-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Oct. 15, 2015.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Case IPR2013-00545, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 11, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case IPR2013-00542 and IPR2013-00543, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Case IPR2013-00542 and IPR2013-00543, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Case IPR2013-00540, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Case IPR2013-00541, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Case IPR2013-00544, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case IPR2013-00543, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Case IPR2013-00542, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case IPR2013-00545, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Case IPR2013-00545, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Case IPR2013-00540, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Case IPR2013-00541, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Paul W. Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,213,578, Case IPR2013-00544, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Kelby Brick, Esq., CDI, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case IPR2013-00543, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Case IPR2013-00550, in the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case IPR2013-00543, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Case IPR2013-00545, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case IPR2013-00549, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Case IPR2013-00542, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Case IPR2013-00540, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Case IPR2013-00541, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Case IPR2013-00544, In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Case PR2013-00550, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Case IPR2013-00545, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Case PR2013-00544, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case PR2013-00543, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Case PR2013-00541, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Case PR2013-00542, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Case PR2013-00540, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner's Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.23, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case PR2013-00549, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jul. 7, 2014.
Decision, CaptionCall's Request for Rehearing, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case IPR2013-00549, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Apr. 28, 2014.
Expert Report of Brenda Battat Regarding Secondary Considerations Related to Plaintiffs' Patents-In-Suit, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 20, 2014 [Redacted].
Expert Report of Mr. Benedict J. Occhiogrosso Regarding Invalidity of Asserted Claims of U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482; 6,233,314; 6,594,346; 6,603,835; 7,003,082; 7,319,740; 7,555,104; and 8,213,578, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBBC, May 30, 2014 [Redacted—Public Version].
Expert Report of Constance Phelps Regarding Secondary Considerations Related to Plaintiffs' Patents-In-Suit, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 20, 2014 [Redacted].
Validity Report of Paul W. Ludwick Under Rule 26(a)(2)(B) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure Regarding U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,909,482; 6,233,314; 6,594,346; and 8,213,578, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 22, 2014 [Redacted].
Validity Report of James A. Steel, Jr. Regarding U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,603,835; 7,003,082; 7,319,740; and 7,555,104, in Response to Expert Report of Benedict Occhiogrosso and Non-Infringement Report Regarding U.S. Pat. No. 3,379,801, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 20, 2014 [Redacted].
Brief in Support of Defendants Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC's Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 17, 2014 [Redacted].
[Corrected] Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 23, 2014 [Redacted].
Plaintiffs Ultratec, Inc. and Captel, Inc.'s Brief in Opposition to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment—Willfulness, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 12, 2014.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso in Support of Defendants' Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 12, 2014.
Response in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 12, 2014 [Redacted—Public Version].
Declaration of Robert M. Engelke in Support of Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 12, 2014 [Redacted].
Defendants' Reply in Support of Their Motion for Partial Summary Judgment, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 22, 2014 [Redacted].
Reply Brief in Support of Plaintiffs' Motion for Partial Summary Judgment of Infringement and Validity, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 22, 2014 [Redacted—Public Version].
Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC's Invalidity Contentions and Exhibits, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 14-CV-66-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Jul. 16, 2014.
Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC's Invalidity Contentions and Exhibits, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 14-CV-66-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, May 16, 2014.
Opinion and Order, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 13-CV-346-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Aug. 28, 2014.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 11-13 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Aug. 13, 2014, 64 pages.
Prosecution History of the 7,660,398 U.S. Patent, 489 pages.
Vaseghi, Chapter 14: Echo Cancellation, Advanced Digital Signal Processing and Noise Reduction, Second Edition, John Wiley & Sons, Ltd., 2000, pp. 396-415.
Ultratec, Inc.and CapTel, Inc. Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC, Civil Action No. 14-CV-66, Feb. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
Plaintiffs, Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc.'s Infringement Contentions, Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel Inc. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. and CaptionCall, LLC, Civil Action No. 14-CV-66, Mar. 28, 2014, 9 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Aug. 13, 2014, 62 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, dated Jan. 28, 2015, 8 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/506,080, dated Feb. 27, 2015, 7 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, dated Sep. 19, 2014, 8 pages.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Sep. 19, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, dated Sep. 24, 2014, 12 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S Appl. No. 14/299,531, dated Oct. 10, 2014, 6 pages.
Applicant, Response (Response to Oct. 10, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,531, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,651, dated Oct. 16, 2014, 5 pages.
Applicant, Response (Response to Oct. 16, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 14/299,651, dated Oct. 17, 2014, 3 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,860, dated Sep. 3, 2014, 9 pages.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Sep. 3, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,860, dated Mar. 3, 2015, 11 pages.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,860, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 8 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Jan. 29, 2015, 67 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jan. 28, 2015, 62 pages.
CaptionCall L.L.C. Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-29 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822 Under 35 U.S.C. 311-319 and 37 C.F.R. 42.100 Et Seq., Jan. 29, 2015, 67 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jan. 28, 2015, 65 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision—Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00780, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Dec. 4, 2014, 14 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00780, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Feb. 11, 2015, 68 pages.
Ultratec Inc. and Captel Inc., Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-847-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Dec. 23, 2014, 15 pages.
Sorenson Communications Inc. and Captioncall LLC, Defendants' First Amended Answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims, Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-847-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Feb. 20, 2015, 41 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before The Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00540, U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Mar. 3, 2015, 55 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00541, U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Mar. 3, 2015, 77 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00542, U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Mar. 3, 2015, 31 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00543, U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Mar. 3, 2015, 29 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00544, U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Mar. 3, 2015, 56 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00545, U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Mar. 3, 2015, 41 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00549, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Mar. 3, 2015, 35 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Final Written Decision, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00550, U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Mar. 3, 2015, 25 pages.
Extended European Search Report for application 16150223.2, European Patent Office, dated Apr. 11, 2016, 8 pages.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2006/025236, dated Oct. 2, 2006.
PCT International Preliminary Report on Patentability, PCT/US2006/025236, dated Jan. 9, 2008.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2009/040523, dated Nov. 4, 2009.
Australian Government IP Australia, Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2006263680, dated Jun. 29, 2009.
Applicant, Response to Jun. 29, 2009 Examiner's First Report, Application No. 2006263680, dated Jun. 17, 2010.
European Patent Office, Examination Report, Application No. 06785768.0, dated Aug. 9, 2010.
Applicant, Response to Aug. 9, 2010 Examination Report, Application No. 06785768.0, dated Dec. 20, 2010.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,613,363, dated Oct. 1, 2012.
Applicant, Response to Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,613,363, dated Mar. 7, 2013.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,613,363, dated Oct. 18, 2013.
Government of India Patent Office, First Examination Report, Application No. In 4970/KOLNP/2007, dated Feb. 26, 2014.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,556,933, dated Apr. 10, 2012.
Applicant, Response to Official Action, Application No. C 2,556,933, dated Jul. 12, 2012.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,556,933, dated Feb. 14, 2013.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion, PCT/US2009/040523, dated Nov. 11, 2009.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Examiner's Report, Application No. CA 2,761,343, dated Mar. 8, 2012.
Applicant, Response to Official Action, Application No. CA 2,761,343, dated Mar. 30, 2012.
Canadian Intellectual Property Office, Notice of Allowance, Application No. CA 2,761,343, dated Jul. 24, 2012.
Applicant, Amendment Submitted with a Request for Continued Examination and Terminal Disclaimers, U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,476, dated Oct. 19, 2011.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Notice of Allowance, U.S. Appl. No. 11/955,476, dated Mar. 2, 2012.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, dated Sep. 13, 2013.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Sep. 13, 2013, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, dated Mar. 11, 2014.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, dated Mar. 26, 2014.
Applicant, Terminal Disclaimers and Remarks, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, dated Apr. 30, 2014.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/486,221, dated Jun. 25, 2014.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,860, dated Jan. 9, 2014.
Applicant, Amendment (Response to Jan. 9, 2014, Office Action), U.S. Appl. No. 13/950,860, dated Jun. 30, 2014.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, in Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Aug. 30, 2013.
Request for Rehearing Under 37 C.F.R. 42.71(d), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case IPR2013-00549, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Mar. 19, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Case IPR2013-00545, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 12, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Case IPR2013-00550, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 12, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case IPR2013-00543, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 12, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Case IPR2013-00542, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 12, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case IPR2013-00549, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 12, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Case IPR2013-00544, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 30, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, Case IPR2013-00541, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 30, 2014.
Patent Owner Response Under 37 C.F.R. 42.120 (to the Institution of Inter Partes Review), In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Case IPR2013-00540, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 30, 2014.
Declaration of Brenda Battat, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,231,578, Case IPR2013-00544, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 8, 2014.
Declaration of Constance Phelps, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, Case IPR2013-00540, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 9, 2014.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 19, 2014.
Declaration of James A. Steel, Jr., In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,740, Case IPR2013-00542, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 10, 2014.
Declaration of James A. Steel, Jr., In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Case IPR2013-00550, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 10, 2014.
Declaration of James A. Steel, Jr., In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Case IPR2013-00549, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 11, 2014.
Declaration of James A. Steel, Jr., In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Case IPR2013-00543, United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated May 12, 2014.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00563-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, dated Sep. 7, 2015.
Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00563-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, dated Nov. 12, 2015.
Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00563-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, dated Dec. 11, 2015.
Defendants' Answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00563-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, dated Dec. 11, 2015.
Plaintiffs' Response to Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00563-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, dated Dec. 18, 2015.
Order Granting Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:15-cv-00563-JDP, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, dated Dec. 22, 2015.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-18 of U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,116, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01355, U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,116, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 65 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01355, U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,116, dated Sep. 18, 2015, 43 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Instituting Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01355, U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,116, dated Dec. 16, 2015, 34 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 5,974,116, Case IPR2015-001355, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 45 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claim 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01357, U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 65 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01357, U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 37 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Instituting Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01357, U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366, dated Dec. 18, 2015, 16 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,934,366, Case IPR2015-001357, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 46 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claim 1 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01358, U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 65 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01358, U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 34 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Instituting Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01358, U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604, dated Dec. 18, 2015, 12 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,006,604, Case IPR2015-001358, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 45 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-3 and 5-7 of U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01359, U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 65 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01359, U.S. Pat. No. 3,493,426, dated Sep. 22, 2015, 40 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Instituting Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01359, U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426, dated Dec. 18, 2015, 17 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 6,493,426, Case IPR2015-001359, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jun. 8, 2015, 47 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-4 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,515,024, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01885, U.S. Pat. No. 8,515,024, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 35 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01885, U.S. Pat. No. 8,515,024, dated Dec. 17, 2015, 25 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,515,024, Case IPR2015-01885, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 23 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1, 3, 6, 9-11, 13, 15, 19-23, 25-27, 34, and 36-38 of U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01886, U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 61 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 7,881,441, Case IPR2015-01886, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 29 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-29 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00636, U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 67 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Contingent Motion to Amend, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00636, U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 39 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00636, U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 29 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Contingent Motion to Amend, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00636, U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 28 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Jan. 29, 2015, 65 pages.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 60 pages.
Declaration of Ivan Zatkovich, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 108 pages.
Declaration of Paul Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 37 pages.
Declaration of Brenda Battat Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 61 pages.
Declaration of Katie Kretschman, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,917,822, Case IPR2015-00636, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 5 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-30 of U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 67 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Jun. 9, 2015, 65 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Instituting Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Sep. 8, 2015, 25 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 65 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Contingent Motion to Amend, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 38 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner's Reply to Patent Owner Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 29 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petitioner's Opposition to Patent Owner's Contingent Motion to Amend, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-00637, U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 28 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jan. 29, 2015, 62 pages.
Supplemental Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Jan. 26, 2016, 62 pages.
Declaration of Ivan Zatkovich, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 110 pages.
Declaration of Paul Ludwick Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 37 pages.
Declaration of Brenda Battat Regarding Secondary Considerations of Non-Obviousness, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 24, 2015, 61 pages.
Declaration of Katie Kretschman, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 8,908,838, Case IPR2015-00637, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Nov. 23, 2015, 5 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Petition for Inter Partes Review of Claims 1-74 of U.S. Pat. No. 9,131,045, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01889, U.S. Pat. No. 9,131,045, dated Sep. 9, 2015, 66 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Preliminary Response, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2015-01889, U.S. Pat. No. 9,131,045, dated Dec. 18, 2015, 26 pages.
Declaration of Benedict J. Occhiogrosso, In Re: U.S. Pat. No. 9,131,045, Case IPR2015-01889, In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, dated Sep. 9, 2015, 63 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-00780, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, dated Dec. 31, 2015, 20 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00540, U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00540, U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00540, U.S. Pat. No. 6,233,314, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case PR2013-00541, U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case PR2013-00541, U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 18 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00541, U.S. Pat. No. 5,909,482, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case PR2013-00542, U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,470, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00542, U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,470, dated Dec. 1, 2015, 15 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00542, U.S. Pat. No. 7,319,470, dated Feb. 2, 2016, 12 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00543, U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, dated Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Boar, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00543, U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Dec. 1, 2015, 15 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00543, U.S. Pat. No. 7,555,104, Feb. 2, 2016, 11 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00544, U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00544, U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Dec. 1, 2015, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00544, U.S. Pat. No. 8,213,578, Feb. 2, 2016, 11 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00545, U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Apr. 2, 2015, 16 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00545, U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Dec. 1, 2015, 15 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00545, U.S. Pat. No. 6,594,346, Feb. 2, 2016, 11 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00549, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00549, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Dec. 1, 2015, 15 pages.
In The United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00549, U.S. Pat. No. 6,603,835, Feb. 2, 2016, 11 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing by Expanded Panel, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00550, U.S Pat. No. 7,003,082, Apr. 2, 2015, 19 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Patent Owner's Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00550, U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Dec. 1, 2015, 10 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Patent Owner's Notice of Appeal, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2013-00550, U.S. Pat. No. 7,003,082, Feb. 2, 2016, 11 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Institution of Inter Partes Review, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-01287, U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398, Feb. 12, 2015, 15 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-01287, U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398, Mar. 13, 2015, 18 pages.
In the United States Patent and Trademark Office Before the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, Decision Denying Request for Rehearing, CaptionCall LLC v. Ultratec Inc., Case IPR2014-01287, U.S. Pat. No. 7,660,398, Nov. 5, 2015, 7 pages.
Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Dec. 8, 2014.
Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Dec. 22, 2014.
Defendants' Answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v.Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Jan. 30, 2015.
Plaintiffs' Answer to Defendants Counterclaims, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Feb. 20, 2015.
Defendants' First Amended Answer to Plaintiffs' Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement and Counterclaims, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Feb. 20, 2015.
Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 7, 2015.
Parties' Stipulation to a Temporary Stay, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 24, 2015.
Order Granting Defendants' Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Apr. 30, 2015.
Joint Notice of IPR Institution and Stipulation to Continue the Stay, Ultratec, Inc., et al. v. Sorenson Communications, Inc., et al., Civil Action No. 3:14-cv-00847-BBC, United States District Court, Western District of Wisconsin, Sep. 11, 2015.
United States Patent and Trademark Office, Office Action Summary and Detailed Action, U.S. Appl. No. 14/988,407, dated Jul. 28, 2016.
Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/969,507, dated Jan. 23, 2017, 13 pages.
Final Office Action issued in U.S. Appl. No. 14/969,507, dated Sep. 1, 2017, 11 pages.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130308763 A1 Nov 2013 US
Provisional Applications (1)
Number Date Country
60545519 Feb 2004 US
Continuations (2)
Number Date Country
Parent 12686688 Jan 2010 US
Child 13950860 US
Parent 11061682 Feb 2005 US
Child 12686688 US