This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 15/378,938, filed Dec. 14, 2016, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application No. 14/128,354, filed May 20, 2014, now U.S. Pat. No. 9,541,480, which is a 371 national stage entry of PCT Application No. PCT/US2012/044701, filed Jun. 28, 2012, which claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/502,844, filed Jun. 29, 2011, and claims the benefit of U.S. Provisional Application No. 61/606,220, filed Mar. 2, 2012, the entirety of which are incorporated by reference.
Not Applicable
Table 1 is the amino acid sequence of EpAb4-1 antibody.
The shedding of cells into the circulation is an intrinsic property of the malignant tumor, and this feature provides important information with regard to the diagnosis, staging, treatment response and survival of cancer patients. For example, Pantel et al found the number of circulating tumor cells (CTCs) in the blood is correlated with the aggressiveness of the cancer as well as the efficacy of the therapy. (Pantel, K. et. al., “Detection, clinical relevance and specific biological properties of disseminating tumor cells”, Nat Rev Cancer. 2008, 8(5):329-40).
However, CTCs, as few as one per 109 blood cells in patients with metastatic cancer, are rare cells. This makes the detection and isolation of CTCs technically challenging (see Kahn et al. Breast Cancer Res Treat 2004, 86:237-47). An enrichment process is therefore necessary to effectively detect and isolate CTCs.
An example of such enrichment process is the use of a highly overexpressed cell surface biomarker with high specificity and sensitivity for CTCs, such as the epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM). The Cellsearch Systet™ (Veridex), the only FDA-approved platform for CTC detection, utilizes anti-EpCAM antibody-coated magnetic nanoparticles to capture and enrich CTCs, followed by cytokeratin immunostaining. The AdnaTest (AdnaGen AG, Germany), another commercially available system for CTC detection, adopts similar immunomagnetic approach by using anti-EpCAM and Mucin 1 (MUC) conjugated magnetic beads. More recently, “CTC chips” based on anti-EpCAM antibody-coated microfluidics chip were developed for CTC detection and enrichment (Nagrath et al, Nature 2007, 450:1235-9). However, the disadvantage of the above techniques is the low detection rate of pure CTCs, due to the non-specific binding of blood cells with anti-EpCAM antibody.
In order to maximize the detection and isolation of CTCs, it is necessary to reduce the nonspecific binding of other circulating blood cells. This can be achieved by surface modification with bioinert materials. For example. Kaladhar et al. observed a significant fewer circulating blood cells (e.g. platelets, leukocytes, and erythrocytes) binding onto the solid substrate modified with supported monolayer of various lipid compositions containing phosphatidyl-choline, cholesterol, and glycolipid (Kaladhar et al, Langmuir 2004, 20: 11115-22 and Kaladhar et al, J Biomed Mater Res A 2006, 79A:23-35).
Despite the advance in the detection and isolation CTCs technology, there is still a need for a more specific and effective method for detecting, purification and releasing CTCs and other biological substances for further cultivation and characterization.
In one aspect, the present invention is directed to a surface coating to capture a circulating rare cell (CRC). This surface coating increases the capture efficiency of a CRC, such as CTC, circulating stem cells (e.g. tumor stem cell and bone marrow stem cells), fetal cells, bacteria, virus, epithelial cells, endothelial cells or the like and reduces the binding of non-specific cells or protein adsorption.
The surface coating comprises 1) a nonfouling composition that reduces the binding of nonspecific blood cells and adsorption of other blood components, such as protein; and 2) a bioactive composition that captures a CRC. The surface coating further comprises a linker composition that attaches to the nonfouling composition and the bioactive composition, as illustrated in
In another aspect, the present invention is directed to a surface coating to capture and release a biological substance. This surface coating increases the capture efficiency of a biological substance, such as CTC, circulating stem cells (e.g. tumor stem cell, liver stem cells and bone marrow stem cells), fetal cells, bacteria, virus, epithelial cells, endothelial cells or the like and enhances the removal or release of the non-specific cells or protein from the surface coating.
The surface coating comprises 1) a releasable composition for releasing or removing nonspecific blood cells and other blood components, such as protein, from the surface coating; and 2) a bioactive composition that captures a biological substance. The surface coating further comprises a linker composition that attaches to the releasable composition and the bioactive composition.
The present invention is also directed to a microfluidic device, with specific microstructure designs to create a disturbed flow of blood, body fluid or biological samples to increase the capture rate of the biological substance.
The present invention is also directed to a method of manufacturing the surface coating, comprising a) forming the nonfouling or the releasable composition; and b) attaching the the linker composition with the nonfouling/releasable composition from step a) and the bioactive composition, or c) attaching the nonfouling/releasable composition from step a) with the bioactive composition.
The present invention is also directed to methods to capture and release the biological substance from the surface coating. The biological substance on the surface coating can be purified by removing the non-specific cells or protein. The captured biological substance can be released by air bubbles, ultraviolet irradiation and the like.
The present invention is also directed to uses of a biotinylated anti-EpCam antibody, EpAb4-1 antibody, to capture a CTC.
Embodiments of the present invention may be described with reference to the accompanying drawings.
The present invention is directed to a surface coating to effectively capture a circulating rare cell (CRC), such as CTC, circulating stem cells (e.g. tumor stem cell and bone marrow stem cells), fetal cells, bacteria, virus, epithelial cells, endothelial cells or the like.
In one embodiment, the surface coating for the capture of a CRC comprises 1) a nonfouling composition that prevents the binding of non-specific cells and adsorption of other blood components, such as protein; and 2) a bioactive composition that captures the circulating rare cells. The nonfouling composition and the bioactive composition are joined by discrete functional groups or moieties present in the nonfouling and bioactive compositions. Generally, a linkage between the two compositions is formed by an interaction comprising electrostatic interaction, hydrophilic-hydrophilic interaction, polar-polar interaction, complementary DNA binding, magnetic force, or combinations thereof.
In one group of embodiments, complementary DNA fragments are used for binding the nonfouling composition and the bioactive composition. The fragments are attached to each of the compositions and can be partially or completely complementary over their lengths. A suitable length of DNA will generally be at least 15, 20, 25, 35, 50, 100 or more bases in length. An example of the DNA used in the present invention is an DNA tweezer. (See, B Yurke et al., A DNA-fueled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature 2000, 406:605-608.)
In another group of embodiments, the surface coating comprises 1) a nonfouling composition; 2) a bioactive composition; and 3) a linker composition, which joins the nonfouling composition to the bioactive composition. Sec
The present invention is also directed to a surface coating to effectively capture a biological substance, such as CTC, circulating stem cells (e.g. tumor stem cell, liver stem cells and bone marrow stem cells), fetal cells, bacteria, virus, epithelial cells, endothelial cells or the like, purify the biological substance on the surface of the surface coating by releasing or removing the non-specific cells and other serum components (e.g. protein) through a buffer rinse, and release the captured biological substance from the surface coating.
The surface coating for the capture and purification of a biological substance comprises 1) a releasable composition for releasing nonspecific blood cells and other blood components, such as protein, through a buffer rinse; and 2) a bioactive composition that captures a biological substance. The releasable composition and the bioactive composition are joined by discrete functional groups or moieties present in the releasable and bioactive compositions. Generally, a linkage between the two compositions is formed by an interaction comprising electrostatic interaction, hydrophilic-hydrophilic interaction, polar-polar interaction, complementary DNA binding, magnetic force, or combinations thereof.
In one embodiment, the surface coating further comprises a linker composition that attaches to the releasable composition and the bioactive composition.
As will be explained in more detail below, the surface coating can be incorporated into the following configurations: cell cultural dishes, microfluidic channels, microfluidic chips, filtration filter, capillaries, tubes, beads, nanoparticles, or the like, with an inner diameter ranging from about 50 to about 1000 um.
Nonfouling and Releasable Composition
The “nonfouling” composition (see
The “releasable” composition comprises a nonfouling composition which also acts as a “lubricating” surface such that only low flow shear stress is required to remove or release the non-specific cells or blood components from the surface coating, while the biological substance remains intact.
The nonfouling composition is selected from the group consisting of: a supported lipid layer such as liposomes, supported lipid bilayers (SLBs) or lipid multilayer, polypeptides, polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs), polyvinyl alcohol, polyethylene glycol (PEG) as illustrated in
For those embodiments in which the nonfouling composition comprises supported lipid bilayers (SLBs), the SLBs typically comprise lipids such as, for example, 1,2-dioleoyl-sn-glycero-3-phosphoethanolamine-N-(cap biotinyl) (sodium salt) (b-PE) as illustrated in
In another group of embodiments, the nonfouling composition comprises PEG, preferably PEG with a molecular weight from about 100 to about 100,000 and exhibits a nonfouling property.
In yet another group of embodiments, the nonfouling composition comprises polyelectrolyte multilayers (PEMs) or a polymer brush. Examples of suitable PEMs useful in the present invention include, but are not limited to, poly-L-lysine/poly-L-glutamic acid (PLL/PLGA), poly-L-lysine/poly-L-aspartic acid or similar counter ionic polyelectrolytes. The polymer brush comprises ([2-(acryloyloxy)ethyl] trimethyl ammonium chloride, TMA)/(2-carboxy ethyl acrylate, CAA) copolymer as illustrated in
The nonfouling composition comprises functional groups capable of covalent, non-covalent, or a combination of covalent and non-covalent attachment, either directly to a functional group present in the bioactive composition, or directly to a functional group that is part of the linkage composition.
In some embodiments, the functional groups of the nonfouling composition (prior to covalent attachment) are selected from: hydroxy groups, amine groups, carboxylic acid or ester groups, thioester groups, aldehyde groups, epoxy or oxirane groups, hyrdrazine groups and thiol groups, which are selected to be reactive with functional groups present in either the linker or bioactive composition. In other embodiments, the functional groups of the nonfouling composition (prior to non-covalent attachment) which are first members of a binding pair, are selected from the group using specific binding recognition consisting of biotin, avidin, streptavidin, DNA, RNA, ligand, receptor, antigen, antibody and positive-negative charges, each of which is selected to bind to a second member of the binding pair which is present in either the linker or bioactive composition.
The Linker Composition
The linker composition joins the nonfouling/releasable composition and the bioactive composition and comprises functional groups capable of covalent, non-covalent, or a combination of covalent and non-covalent attachment directly to a functional group present in the nonfouling/releasable composition and to a functional group that is part of the bioactive composition.
In some embodiments, the linker composition comprises functional groups (prior to covalent attachment) selected from: hydroxy groups, amine groups, carboxylic acid or ester groups, thioester groups, aldehyde groups, epoxy or oxirane groups, hyrdrazine groups and thiol groups, which are selected to be reactive with functional groups present in either the nonfouling or bioactive composition.
In other embodiments, the linker composition comprises functional groups (prior to non-covalent attachment) which are first members of a binding pair, selected from the group using specific binding recognition consisting of biotin, avidin, streptavidin, DNA, RNA, ligand, receptor, antigen, antibody and positive-negative charges, each of which is selected to bind to a second member of the binding pair which is present on the nonfouling/releasable composition or the bioactive composition.
The functional groups on the linker composition can also be a cleavable functional group, selected from: a photosensitive functional group cleavable by ultraviolet irradiation, an electrosensitive functional group cleavable by electro pulse mechanism, a magnetic material cleavable by the absence of the magnetic force, a polyelectrolyte material cleavable by breaking the electrostatic interaction, a DNA cleavable by hybridization, and the like.
Bioactive Composition
The bioactive composition joins to either the linker composition or the nonfouling composition, and comprises a binding moiety selective for the detection of the biological substance or CRC.
The bioactive composition comprises functional groups capable of covalent, non-covalent, or a combination of covalent and non-covalent attachment directly to a functional group present in the nonfouling layer or to a functional group that is part of the linker composition.
In some embodiments, the functional groups of the bioactive composition (prior to covalent attachment) are selected from: hydroxy groups, amine groups, carboxylic acid or ester groups, thioester groups, aldehyde groups, epoxy or oxirane groups, hyrdrazine groups and thiol groups which are selected to be reactive with functional groups present in either the nonfouling or linker composition. In other embodiments, the functional groups of the bioactive composition (prior to non-covalent attachment) are selected from the group using specific binding recognition consisting of biotin, avidin, streptavidin, DNA, RNA, ligand, receptor, antigen-antibody and positive-negative charges, each of which is selected to bind to a second member of the binding pair which is present on the nonfouling/releasable composition or the linker composition.
The binding moiety of the bioactive composition has specific affinity with the biological substance through molecular recognition, chemical affinity, or geometrical/shape recognition. Examples of the binding moiety for the detection of the biological substance include, but are not limited to: synthetic polymers, molecular imprinted polymers, extracellular matrix proteins, binding receptors, antibodies, DNA, RNA, antigens or any other surface markers which present high affinity to the biological substance. A preferred antibody is the anti-EpCAM membrane protein antibody (commercially available from many sources, including R&D Systems, Minn., USA), which provides high specificity for CTCs because EpCAM is frequently overexpressed in the lung, colorectal, breast, prostate, head and neck and hepatic malignancies, but is absent from haematologic cells. Another preferred antibody is Anti-HER2, which has high specificity for CTCs but absent in haematologic cells.
In one embodiment, the anti-EpCAM membrane protein antibody is EpAb4-1 antibody, comprising a heavy chain sequence with SEQ ID No:1 and alight chain sequence with SEQ ID NO: 2 shown in Table 1.
GYTFTNYG
INTYTGEP
MN
RSSKSLLH
HMSNLAS
SNGITYLY
FGRSVDF
AQNLENPR
T
Complementary-determining regions 1-3 (CDR1-3), framework regions 1-4 (FW1-4) for both the VH and VL domains are shown. The V domain families were aligned by VBASE2 database (www.vbase2.org).
The bioactive composition can have a variety of thicknesses, selected so that it does not affect the function or the performance of the surface coating.
In one embodiment, the conjugation linkers or catalysts for the nonfouling composition and the bioactive compositions are biotin/avidin or their derivatives. In another embodiment, the conjugation linkers or catalysts for the nonfouling composition and the bioactive composition are EDC/NHS. In yet another preferred embodiment, the conjugation linker or catalysts for the nonfouling composition and the bioactive compositions are sulfo-SMCC.
Solid Substrate
In some embodiments, the surface coating is attached to the solid substrate without a surface linker, as illustrated in
In other embodiments, the surface coating is attached to the solid substrate with a surface linker, as illustrated in
The surface linker composition comprises functional groups capable of covalent, non-covalent, or a combination of covalent and non-covalent attachment directly to a functional group present in the nonfouling/releasable composition and to a functional group that is part of the solid substrate. Examples of the surface linker for binding the surface coating to a glass substrate include, but are not limited to, silane, aminopropyltriethoxy silane, aminopropyltrimethoxy silane, silane-PEG-NH2, silane-PEG-N3 (PEG molecular weight is about 1,000 to about 30,000 daltons) and silane-PEG biotin.
In one group of embodiments, the surface linker comprises a cleavable functional group selected from: a photosensitive functional group cleavable by ultraviolet irradiation, an electrosensitive functional group cleavable by electro-pulse mechanism, an iron or magnetic material in which the absence of the magnetic force will release the nonfouling composition, a polyelectrolyte material cleavable by breaking the electrostatic interaction, an DNA cleavable by hybridization, and the like.
In one embodiment, the nonfouling composition comprises silane-functionalized PEG and the solid substrate is preferably selected from the group consisting of silicon, glass, hydroxylated poly(methyl methacrylate) (PMMA), aluminum oxide, TiO2 and the like. In another embodiment, the nonfouling composition comprises thiol-functionalized compounds and the solid substrate is preferably selected from the group consisting of Au, Ag, Pt, and the like.
The Method of Manufacturing the Surface Coating
1. Formation of the nonfouling/releasable composition (e.g. SLB or PEG) with appropriate functional group (biotin);
2. Attaching the functional group (streptavidin) on the linker composition to the functional group (biotin) on the nonfouling/releasable composition;
3. Formation of the bioactive composition and attaching the functional group (biotin) on the bioactive composition to the functional group (streptavidin) on the linker composition.
The surface coating without a linker composition can be formed by:
1. Formation of the nonfouling/releasable composition with appropriate functional group (e.g. carboxyl group of N-glutaryl phosphatidylethanolamine or NGPE);
2. Formation and attaching the functional group (primary amine) on the bioactive composition to the functional group (carboxyl group of NOPE) on the nonfouling/releasable composition in step 1.
The steps in forming the surface coating as described above can be reversed, and the steps for forming the surface coating without a link composition as described above can be reversed.
Microfluidic Chip
As illustrated in
Referring to
Once the microfluidic chip is formed, the surface coating can be attached to one or both solid substrates. In one group of embodiments, the surface coating is attached to the solid substrate with a surface linker. In another group of embodiments, the surface coating is attached to the solid substrate via one of the following interactions: covalent bonding (for PEG nonfouling composition), hydrogen bonding, electrostatic interaction, hydrophilic-hydrophilic interaction (for SLB nonfouling/releasable composition), polar-polar interaction, complimentary DNA binding, magnetic force, or the like.
Referring to
Two factors govern the capture efficiency of the microfluidic chip:
(1) The linear speed of the blood, body fluid or biological sample, which determines the contact time of the biological substance and the surface coating. In a preferred embodiment, the linear speed is about 0.1 mm/s to 1 mm/s. In a more preferred embodiment, the linear speed is about 0.42 mm/s or 0.5 ml/h for Design E in
(2) The flow disturbance of the blood, body fluid or biological sample, created by the microstructures 4 on the solid substrate(s). The flow disturbance increases contact between the biological substance and the surface coating.
The biological substance capture efficiency of the various designs are shown in
Flow Purification
The biological substance on the surface coating can be further purified by removing the non-specific cells and other blood components on the surface of the nonfouling/releasable composition. The nonfouling/releasable composition has low affinity for non-specific cells and other blood components. Therefore, rinsing the surface coating with a low flow buffer solution of about 0.8 dyne/cm2 to about 50 dyne/cm2 is sufficient to remove non-specific cells and other blood components on the nonfouling/releasable composition while the biological substance remains on the surface coating.
In a preferred embodiment, the shear force of the buffer rinse is about 2.5 to about 10 dyne/cm2.
Release of the Biological Substance
After removing the majority of the non-specific cells and blood components by flow purification, the biological substance can be released from the surface coating.
If the nonfouling/releasable composition comprises a lipid or a mixture of lipid, the captured biological substance can be released by introducing an air bubble solution or oil phase. As shown in
If the nonfouling composition comprises a composition other than a lipid or a mixture of lipid, the captured biological substance can be released by breaking the cleavable functional group on the linker composition or on the surface linker. This release mechanism is illustrated in
The biological substance can also be released by other mechanisms. In one group of embodiments, the linker composition or the surface linker comprises an electrosensitive cleavable functional group, and the biological substance is released by electro pulse mechanism. In another group of embodiments, the linker composition or the surface linker comprises a magnetic material as the cleavable functional group, and the absence of the magnetic field or force releases the biological substance. In yet another group of embodiments, the linker composition or the surface linker comprises a PEM as the cleavable functional group, and the biological substance is released by changing the electrostatic interaction between the layers. In yet another group of embodiments, the linker composition or the surface linker comprises an DNA piece as the cleavable functional group, and the biological substance is released by DNA hybridization.
The following examples further illustrate the present invention. These examples are intended merely to be illustrative of the present invention and are not to be construed as being limiting.
Preparation of the Nonfouling Composition:
Supported lipid bilayer (SLB) was prepared by the following steps:
(1) POPC and b-PE (commercially available from Avanti Polar Lipids, USA) were dissolved in chloroform and the final lipid concentration was 5 mg/mL. The POPC/b-PE solution was vortex dried under a slow stream of nitrogen to form a thin, uniform POPC/b-PE film. The POPC/b-PE film was further dried in a vacuum chamber overnight to remove residual chloroform.
(2) The POPC/biotin-PE film in step (1) was dispersed in and mixed with a phosphate buffer containing 10 mM of phosphate buffered saline, 150 mM of sodium chloride aqueous solution, and 0.02% (w/v) of sodium azide (NaN3, commercially available from Sigma-Aldrich, USA), with the pH adjusted to 7.2. The mixed solution was filtered through the 100-nm, followed by the 50-nm Nuclepore® track-etched polycarbonate membranes (Whatman Schleicher & Schuell, Germany) at least 10 times under 150 psi at room temp.
(3) The filtered solution in step (2) was passed through the LIPEX™ Extruder (Northern Lipids, Inc. Canada) to generate a homogenous population of unilamillar vesicles. The size of the POPC/biotin-PE vesicles was about 65±3 nm, determined by the dynamic laser light scattering detector (Zetasizer Nano ZS, Malvern Instruments, Germany).
Preparation of the Bioactive Composition
Biotinylated EpCAM Antibody was prepared by the following steps:
(1) The anti-EpCAM monoclonal antibody (OC98-1 or EpAb4-1) was generated by method described by Chen et al (Clin Vaccine Immunol 2007; 14:404-11).
(2) The antibody in step (1) was dissolved in a buffer solution containing 10 mM of PBS and 150 mM of NaCl, with a pH about 7.2. The concentration of the antibody buffer solution was about 0.65 mg/mL, determined by Nanodrop 1000 spectrophotometer (Thermo Scientific, USA).
(3) The antibody solution in step (2) was mixed with 10 mM of Sulfo NHS-LC-Biotin (with a molar ratio of 1 to 10) and dissolved in Milli-Q water (Milli-Q RO system, USA) at room temperature for 30 min. Excess biotin was removed by dialysis in phosphate buffered saline at 4° C. for 24 h, with a buffer change every 12 h.
(4) The ratio of biotin and antibody in the biotinylated anti-EpCAM antibody (bOC98-1 or bEpAb4-1) was 1.5 to 1, determined by the HABA assay using a biotin quantitation kit (Pierce, USA).
Alternatively, commercially available biotinylated goat anti-human anti-EpCAM antibody from R and D Systems (Minneapolis, Minn.) could be used.
Preparation of Solid Substrates of the Present Invention
Glass substrate (such as microscope coverslips from Deckglaser, Germany) were cleaned with 10% DECON 90 (Decon Laboratories Limited, England), rinsed with Milli-Q water, dried under nitrogen gas, and exposed to oxygen plasma in a plasma cleaner (Harrick Plasma, Ithaca, N.Y., U.S.A.) at 100 mtorr for 10 min. Prior to each use, the glass substrate was rinsed with ethanol and dried under nitrogen gas.
Silicon oxide based solid substrates (e.g. silicon wafer or glass coverslips) were cleaned with piranha solution (70% sulfuric acid and 30% hydrogen peroxide (v/v)) at 120° C. for 40 min, subsequently washed with distilled water and rinsed with acetone. The solid substrates were dried under a stream of nitrogen and treated with a plasma cleaner.
For the vapor phase silanization reaction, clean silicon oxide substrates and a Petri-dish containing 150 uL of 3-(aminopropyl)-triethoxysilane (Sigma, USA) were placed in a desiccator (Wheaton dry-seal desiccator, 100 nm) under reduced pressure at ˜0.3 Torr for 16 h. The substrates were cleaned by acetone and dried under nitrogen stream.
Construction of the SLB Surface Coating on a Solid Substrate
0.25 mg/ml of POPC/b-PE vesicle solution described above was added to the cleaned solid substrate to form a SLB coated solid substrate. This was followed by an extensive rinse with a phosphate buffer containing 10 mM PBS and 150 mM NaCl (pH=7.2) to remove excess POPC/b-PE vesicles. Biotin was the functional group in the SLB which binds with the functional group (streptavidin) in the linker composition.
0.1 mg/mL of streptavidin (SA) solution (commercially available from Pierce Biotechnology. Rockford, Ill., USA) was added to the SLB coated solid substrate and incubated for 1 hour, followed with a PBS buffer rinse to remove excess SA.
About 0.05 mg/mL of b-Anti-EpCAM solution was added to the SA-SLB coated solid substrate to form the surface coating of the present invention.
Construction of the PEG Surface Coating on a Solid Substrate
The biotinylated PEG silane solution (Si-bPEGs) was added to the clean glass substrate and incubated for 1 hour to form a Si-bPEG nonfouling composition on the glass substrate, followed by an ethanol rinse to remove excess Si-bPEGs. Silane was the surface linker and the biotin was the functional group that bind with the functional group (SA) in the linker composition.
0.1 mg/mL of SA solution was added to the Si-bPEGs coated solid substrate and incubated for 1 hour, followed by a PBS buffer rinse to remove excess SA.
0.05 mg/mL of b-Anti-EpCAM solution was added and bound with SA-Si-bPEGs surface coating, followed by PBS buffer rinse to remove excess b-Anti-EpCAM.
Construction of the PEM Surface Coating on a Solid Substrate
Physical deposition of PEM films was performed by batch and static conditions as follows: initially, all polypeptides were dissolved in 10 mM Tris-HCl buffer with 0.15 M NaCl, pH 7.4. Solid substrates were then immersed in PLL (MW 15000-30000; Sigma, St Louis, Mo.) solution (1 mg/mL) for 10 min at room temperature, followed by rinsing with 1 mL of Tris-HCl buffer for 1 min. To couple PLGA, the PLL-coated slide was subsequently immersed in the PLGA solution (MW 3000-15000, Sigma, St Louis, Mo., 1 mg/mL) for 10 min, followed by rinsing with 1 mL of Tris-HCl buffer for 1 min. Lastly, substrates were cleaned with fresh PBS to remove uncoupled polypeptides. The resulting c-(PLL/PLGA)i, where i was denoted as the number of polyelectrolyte pairs generated by repeating the above steps: i) 0.5 was referred to c-PLL only, i) 1 was referred to c-(PLL/PLGA)1, and the like.
QCM-D Characterization of the SLB Surface Coating
The construction of the surface coating was monitored by quartz crystal microbalance with dissipation (QCM-D). The QCM-D response in
The characteristics of the SLB nonfouling composition on the surface coating were examined using QCM-D (
The microfluidic chip can be prepared by the following steps:
1. A commercial CO2 laser scriber (Helix 24, Epilog, USA) was used to engrave the microtrenches to form microstructures on the PMMA substrate.
2. The PMMA substrate, glass substrate and nuts were cleaned with MeOH, detergent and water, followed by 10 min sonication. The nuts and the solid substrates were dried by nitrogen gas and baked for 10 min at 60° C.
3. The PMMA substrate was bonded with nuts by chloroform treatment.
4. PMMA substrate and the glass slide were joined together using an adhesive (e.g. 3M doubled sided tape from 3M, USA).
Eight blood samples were used to determine the CTC capture rate of the Anti-EpCAM functionalized SLB surface coating in a microfluidic chip in Example 2. Each blood sample contained 2 ml of blood from a stage IV colon cancer patient and the sample was introduced to the sealed channel of the microfluidic chip at 0.5 ml/hr, controlled by a syringe pump. Subsequently, the sealed channel in the microfluidic chip was rinsed with 0.5 ml of PBS buffer at the flow rate of 1 ml/h, followed by in situ immunostaining.
The number of CTCs captured per ml of blood for these 8 samples were 26, 34, 36, 39, 47, 67 79, and 99, 25% of the blood samples had 79 or higher CTC count per ml of testing sample and the median CTC count was 43 per ml of testing sample. There was minimal binding of the non-specific cells and proteins after the buffer rinse.
As a comparison, the CTC count for the FDA approved Veridex CellSearch is as follows: 25% of the samples had 3 or more CTCs per 7.5 ml of testing sample and the median CTC counts was 0.
The anti-EpCAM functionalized SLB surface was incubated with 150 uL of HCT116 cancer cell spiked human blood (with HCT116 cancer cell density of approximately 10 to 100 per 100 μL of blood), followed by a buffer rinse to remove non-specific cells.
The results show the surface coating of the present invention is effective in capturing CTCs and releasing the non-specific cells.
The capture rate of HCT116 cancer cells (biological substance) and the nonfouling property of six different surface conditions are illustrated in
The results show that the surface coatings of the present invention (lipid/SA/b-anti-EpCAM and PEG (15 mM)/SA/b-anti-EpCAM) are more effective in capturing the biological substance. There is less binding of the non-specific cells (white blood cells or WBC) on the surface coatings of the present invention compare to a surface coating without a nonfouling composition (glass only).
The differentiated flow shear could selectively “flush” out the non-specific cells based on the affinity of these cells to the nonfouling composition, while the biological substance remains on the surface coating.
In this study, the surface coating comprised a SLB, a linker composition and fibronectin as the bioactive composition.
The HCT 116 cells (red) were flushed away from the surface coating within 5 min of the buffer rinse, as shown in
The result shows a shear stress about 3 dyne/cm2 is sufficient to remove the non-specific cells from the releasable composition.
The captured HCT116 cancer cells on the surface coating in Example 3 were released by introducing air bubbles.
The captured CTCs were incubated with 5 mM of EDTA at 37° C. for 5 to 10 min and released by flowing a culture medium into the sealed channel of the microfluidic chip. A total of 18 colo205 cells were released from this procedure. The released colo205 cells, together with a serum-containing culture medium and antibiotics (penicillin+streptomycin+gentamicin), were placed into a 48-well tissue cultured polystyrene plate for cultivation.
Any membranes, tubes, capillaries, beads, nanoparticles or channels can be coated with the surface coating of the present invention.
The binding specificity of biotinylated OC9801 antibody, biotinylated EpAb4-1 antibody and biotinylated EpCam antibody (commercially available from R&D system, USA) were examined using the HCT116 (colorectal) CTCs and SAS (tongue) CTCs.
The CTCs were spiked in a buffer solution (about 105 CTCs/ml). The CTC-spiked buffer solution was introduced to the surface coatings with the following bioactive composition: biotinylated OC9801 antibody, biotinylated EpAb4-1 antibody, biotinylated EpCam antibody and IgG antibody.
The CTC binding specificy of the antibodies was determined by colorimetric method, by measuring the absorption optical density at 490 nm.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3784015 | Kasten | Jan 1974 | A |
5147606 | Charlton et al. | Sep 1992 | A |
5554686 | Frisch, Jr. et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5646001 | Terstappen et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5652148 | Doshi et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
5707799 | Hansmann et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5837115 | Austin et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
5842787 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Dec 1998 | A |
5885470 | Parce et al. | Mar 1999 | A |
5952173 | Hansmann et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6039897 | Lochhead et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6046295 | Frisch, Jr. et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6153113 | Goodrich et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
6271309 | Roberts et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6280622 | Goodrich et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6322683 | Wolk et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6361749 | Terstappen et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6365362 | Terstappen et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6372542 | Martin et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6562616 | Toner et al. | May 2003 | B1 |
6613525 | Nelson et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6620627 | Liberti et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6623982 | Liberti et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
6632652 | Austin et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
6645731 | Terstappen et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6685841 | Lopez et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
6699952 | Chaikof et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6790366 | Terstappen et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
6790599 | Madou | Sep 2004 | B1 |
6844028 | Mao et al. | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6887578 | Gleason et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6890426 | Terstappen et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
6955738 | Derand et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
6960449 | Wang et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7005493 | Huang et al. | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7056657 | Terstappen et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7067194 | Mao et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7117807 | Bohn et al. | Oct 2006 | B2 |
7150812 | Huang et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7190818 | Ellis et al. | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7229760 | Zohlnhofer et al. | Jun 2007 | B2 |
7276170 | Oakey et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7282350 | Rao et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7318902 | Oakey et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
7332288 | Terstappen et al. | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7368163 | Huang et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7374944 | Thompson et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
7428325 | Douglass et al. | Sep 2008 | B2 |
7431969 | Gleason et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7442515 | Ratner et al. | Oct 2008 | B2 |
7472794 | Oakey et al. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7485343 | Branson et al. | Feb 2009 | B1 |
7501157 | Mao et al. | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7531120 | Van Rijn et al. | May 2009 | B2 |
7579077 | Dubrow et al. | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7588550 | Leonard et al. | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7629029 | Mao et al. | Dec 2009 | B2 |
7687241 | Chen et al. | Mar 2010 | B2 |
7695775 | Kobrin et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7713689 | Chilkoti | May 2010 | B2 |
7723112 | Clarke et al. | May 2010 | B2 |
7727399 | Leonard et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7735652 | Inglis et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7736891 | Nelson et al. | Jun 2010 | B2 |
7777010 | Logtenberg | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7783098 | Douglass et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
7785810 | Chen et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
RE41762 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2010 | E |
7815922 | Chaney et al. | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7846393 | Tai et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7846445 | Schellenberger et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7846743 | Tai et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7850633 | Leonard et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855068 | Cao | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7855279 | Schellenberger et al. | Dec 2010 | B2 |
7863012 | Rao et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
7879444 | Jiang et al. | Feb 2011 | B2 |
RE42249 | Lopez et al. | Mar 2011 | E |
7901950 | Connelly et al. | Mar 2011 | B2 |
RE42315 | Lopez et al. | May 2011 | E |
7955704 | Lowery et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7960166 | Vacanti et al. | Jun 2011 | B2 |
7973136 | Lazar et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7981688 | Stayton et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7985475 | Dubrow | Jul 2011 | B2 |
7988840 | Huang et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
7993821 | Chiu et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8008032 | Forsyth et al. | Aug 2011 | B2 |
8012480 | Lorence | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8021318 | Leonard et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8021614 | Huang et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8025854 | Ohman et al. | Sep 2011 | B2 |
8057418 | Korbling et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
8063187 | Chu et al. | Nov 2011 | B2 |
D650091 | Odeh | Dec 2011 | S |
8069782 | Fragala et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8083706 | Leonard et al. | Dec 2011 | B2 |
8092684 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8093365 | Wisniewski et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8097153 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8097162 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8101720 | Lazar et al. | Jan 2012 | B2 |
8158410 | Tang et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8158728 | Desimone et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
8178602 | Mao et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8186913 | Toner et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
8282799 | Huang et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8288116 | Chen et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8288170 | Tai et al. | Oct 2012 | B2 |
8304230 | Toner et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8308699 | Zhang et al. | Nov 2012 | B2 |
8333934 | Cao et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8343440 | Yoshioka | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8357528 | Vacanti et al. | Jan 2013 | B2 |
8367314 | Chilkoti | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8372579 | Toner et al. | Feb 2013 | B2 |
8414806 | Sun et al. | Apr 2013 | B2 |
8445225 | Kuhn et al. | May 2013 | B2 |
8481336 | Earhart et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8491516 | Leonard et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8507283 | Stayton et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8545983 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8557528 | Hauch et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8557577 | Hauch et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8574660 | Weaver et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8579117 | Sturm et al. | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8632838 | Roth et al. | Jan 2014 | B2 |
8663625 | Stroock et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8669044 | Chiu et al. | Mar 2014 | B2 |
8796184 | Chilkoti et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8821812 | Ohman et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8822231 | Melin et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8835144 | Jiang et al. | Sep 2014 | B2 |
8895298 | Toner et al. | Nov 2014 | B2 |
8911957 | Irimia et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8921102 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2014 | B2 |
8980568 | Lin et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986966 | Toner et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
8986988 | Karnik et al. | Mar 2015 | B2 |
9016221 | Brennan et al. | Apr 2015 | B2 |
9056318 | Bergman et al. | Jun 2015 | B2 |
9140697 | Tseng et al. | Sep 2015 | B2 |
9174222 | Huang et al. | Nov 2015 | B2 |
9494500 | Chang et al. | Nov 2016 | B2 |
9541480 | Chang et al. | Jan 2017 | B2 |
10107726 | Shao et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10112198 | Chang et al. | Oct 2018 | B2 |
10495644 | Chang et al. | Dec 2019 | B2 |
10605708 | Shao | Mar 2020 | B2 |
20010031309 | Lee et al. | Oct 2001 | A1 |
20010036556 | Jen | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020009759 | Terstappen et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020055093 | Abbott et al. | May 2002 | A1 |
20020098535 | Wang et al. | Jul 2002 | A1 |
20020119482 | Nelson et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20020125192 | Lopez et al. | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20020141913 | Terstappen et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020160139 | Huang et al. | Oct 2002 | A1 |
20020182633 | Chen et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030022216 | Mao et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030071525 | Tong et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030087338 | Messersmith et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
20030096226 | Logtenberg | May 2003 | A1 |
20030129676 | Terstappen et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030134416 | Yamanishi et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030138645 | Gleason et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030157054 | Gillies | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030159999 | Oakey et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030163084 | Griffiths et al. | Aug 2003 | A1 |
20030206901 | Chen | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030213551 | Derand et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20030216534 | Chaikof et al. | Nov 2003 | A1 |
20040004043 | Terstappen et al. | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040009471 | Cao | Jan 2004 | A1 |
20040028875 | Van Rijn et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040038339 | Kufer et al. | Feb 2004 | A1 |
20040053334 | Ratner et al. | Mar 2004 | A1 |
20040072269 | Rao et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20040109853 | McDaniel | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040115721 | Mao et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040118757 | Terstappen et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20040175407 | McDaniel | Sep 2004 | A1 |
20040225249 | Leonard et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
20040254419 | Wang et al. | Dec 2004 | A1 |
20050025797 | Wang et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050042766 | Ohman et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
20050058576 | Pranis et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050079132 | Wang et al. | Apr 2005 | A1 |
20050100675 | Mao et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050107870 | Wang et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
20050147758 | Mao et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050153342 | Chen | Jul 2005 | A1 |
20050175501 | Thompson et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050178286 | Bohn et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181195 | Dubrow | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050181463 | Rao et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050186685 | Kange et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
20050215764 | Tuszynski et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
20050230272 | Lee et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050255327 | Chaney et al. | Nov 2005 | A1 |
20050265980 | Chen et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050267440 | Herman et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20050288398 | Messersmith et al. | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060002825 | Derand et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060009550 | Messersmith et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060014013 | Saavedra et al. | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060057180 | Chilkoti et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060076295 | Leonard et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060079740 | Silver et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060088666 | Kobrin et al. | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060093836 | Huang et al. | May 2006 | A1 |
20060134599 | Toner et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060137438 | Lenzing et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060159916 | Dubrow et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060160066 | Bhatia et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060166183 | Short et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060169642 | Oakey et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060173394 | Stroock et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060194192 | Rao et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060237390 | King et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060251795 | Kobrin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060252046 | Short et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060252054 | Lin et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060254972 | Tai et al. | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060285996 | Ohman et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070003549 | Ignatovich et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070010702 | Wang et al. | Jan 2007 | A1 |
20070025883 | Tai et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070026381 | Huang et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070026416 | Fuchs | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070026469 | Fuchs et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070032620 | Gleason et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070037173 | Allard et al. | Feb 2007 | A1 |
20070048859 | Sears | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070059716 | Balis et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070071762 | Ts'o et al. | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070072220 | Chilkoti | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20070077276 | Haynie | Apr 2007 | A1 |
20070122406 | Chamberlain et al. | May 2007 | A1 |
20070131622 | Oakey et al. | Jun 2007 | A1 |
20070154960 | Connelly et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070160502 | Hwang | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070172903 | Toner et al. | Jul 2007 | A1 |
20070178133 | Rolland | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070187250 | Huang et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070202536 | Yamanishi et al. | Aug 2007 | A1 |
20070231851 | Toner et al. | Oct 2007 | A1 |
20070259424 | Toner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070264675 | Toner et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070266777 | Bergman et al. | Nov 2007 | A1 |
20070281353 | Vacanti et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080009780 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080023399 | Inglis et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080026486 | Cooper et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080090239 | Shoemaker et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080113350 | Terstappen | May 2008 | A1 |
20080114096 | Qu et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
20080131425 | Garcia et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080147178 | Pacetti et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080149566 | Messersmith et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080176271 | Silver et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080181861 | Jiang et al. | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20080188638 | Breitenkamp et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080206757 | Lin et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080207913 | Breitenkamp et al. | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080213853 | Garcia et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080220531 | Stayton et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20080241892 | Roitman et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080248499 | Chiu et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080255305 | Brook et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20080274335 | Bowman et al. | Nov 2008 | A1 |
20080311182 | Ferrari et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20080312356 | Kobrin et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090020431 | Voccia et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090029043 | Rong et al. | Jan 2009 | A1 |
20090036982 | Aharoni et al. | Feb 2009 | A1 |
20090060791 | Hagiwara et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090068760 | Nelson et al. | Mar 2009 | A1 |
20090093610 | Textor et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090098017 | Celik-Butler et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090105463 | Berry et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090114344 | Barinov et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090117574 | Labgold et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090136982 | Tang et al. | May 2009 | A1 |
20090139931 | Leonard et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090142772 | Lau et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090156460 | Jiang et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090181441 | Jin et al. | Jul 2009 | A1 |
20090203536 | Vermette et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090215088 | Forsyth et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090226499 | Wisniewski et al. | Sep 2009 | A1 |
20090247424 | Chilkoti et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259015 | Jiang et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090259302 | Trollsas et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090263457 | Trollsas et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090264317 | Ofir et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090269323 | Luk et al. | Oct 2009 | A1 |
20090281250 | Desimone et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090285873 | Lim et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090292234 | Leonard et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090298067 | Irimia et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090311734 | Greve et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20090317836 | Kuhn et al. | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100004578 | Leonard et al. | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100028526 | Martin et al. | Feb 2010 | A1 |
20100055733 | Lutolf et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100059414 | Sturm et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100061892 | Flaim et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100062156 | Kurth et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100063570 | Pacetti et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100081735 | Mao et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092393 | Haghgooie et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100092491 | Anastasi | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100096327 | Gin et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099160 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100099579 | Chilkoti | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100112026 | Karp | May 2010 | A1 |
20100118642 | Ho et al. | May 2010 | A1 |
20100137984 | Lowery et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100140160 | Dubrow et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143438 | Todd et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100143741 | Bell et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100145286 | Zhang et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100151491 | Himmelhaus et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100152708 | Li et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100159462 | Takayama et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100160645 | Breitenkamp et al. | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20100169990 | Clarke et al. | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100173402 | Chen | Jul 2010 | A1 |
20100198131 | Leonard et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100209612 | Rong et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100210745 | Mcdaniel et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20100226943 | Brennan et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233146 | Mcdaniel | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233693 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233694 | Kopf-Sill et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100233812 | Sun et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100247492 | Kuhn et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100247760 | Houben et al. | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248334 | Mcdaniel | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100248358 | Yoshioka | Sep 2010 | A1 |
20100273991 | Luk et al. | Oct 2010 | A1 |
20100278892 | Krauland et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100279321 | Chiu et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100280252 | Breitenkamp et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285581 | Hauch et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100285972 | Dubrow et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100294146 | Fragala et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
20100304485 | Karnik et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100311599 | Wheeler et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100316842 | Tuteja et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100323918 | Huang et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100330025 | Messersmith et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20100331965 | Dugas et al. | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20110005997 | Kurth et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110008404 | Lyon et al. | Jan 2011 | A1 |
20110027803 | Moussavi et al. | Feb 2011 | A1 |
20110048947 | Petronis et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110054347 | Goss et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110056884 | Leonard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110059468 | Earhart et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110062083 | Leonard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110066097 | Leonard et al. | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110091864 | Karlsson et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110097277 | Jiang et al. | Apr 2011 | A1 |
20110105712 | Jiang et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110105982 | Leonard et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110117674 | Melin et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
20110143119 | Bell et al. | Jun 2011 | A1 |
20110165161 | Lin et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110165415 | Ma et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110171663 | Smith et al. | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20110192233 | Aizenberg et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110195104 | Jiang et al. | Aug 2011 | A1 |
20110212085 | Joseloff et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110212297 | Dhinojwala et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110212440 | Viovy et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110217449 | Lowery et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110224383 | Sill et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110236904 | Hauch et al. | Sep 2011 | A1 |
20110240064 | Wales et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110240595 | Dubrow | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250626 | Williams et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110250679 | Chang | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110256619 | Vacanti et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
20110266492 | Stayton et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110275530 | Walfish et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110282005 | Jiang et al. | Nov 2011 | A1 |
20110294186 | Fuchs et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300551 | Rao et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110300603 | Forsyth et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110301442 | Luecke et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305660 | Stayton et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305872 | Li et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305881 | Schultz et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305895 | Roth et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305898 | Zhang et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20110305909 | Weaver et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120003711 | Tseng et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120006728 | Huang et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015146 | Advincula et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120015835 | Fuchs et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120021200 | Koberstein et al. | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120028342 | Ismagilov et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120037544 | Lane et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120045828 | Davis et al. | Feb 2012 | A1 |
20120052415 | Fragala et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058302 | Eggenspieler et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120058500 | Mitchell et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120061304 | Leonard et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120064150 | Wisniewski et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120077246 | Hong et al. | Mar 2012 | A1 |
20120094327 | Young et al. | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20120114742 | Martinez et al. | May 2012 | A1 |
20120178094 | Kuhn | Jul 2012 | A1 |
20120196273 | Huang et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
20120252022 | Walfish et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120270209 | Shah et al. | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20120301900 | Kang et al. | Nov 2012 | A1 |
20130121895 | Tang et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
20130143197 | Heyneker | Jun 2013 | A1 |
20140017776 | Kopf-Sill | Jan 2014 | A1 |
20140296095 | Lin et al. | Oct 2014 | A1 |
20170199184 | Chang et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1646912 | Jul 2005 | CN |
1731901 | Feb 2006 | CN |
101701039 | May 2010 | CN |
101765762 | Jun 2010 | CN |
102011193 | Apr 2011 | CN |
103261436 | Aug 2013 | CN |
103998932 | Aug 2014 | CN |
0783694 | Nov 2003 | EP |
2359689 | Aug 2011 | EP |
1569510 | Nov 2011 | EP |
2359689 | Aug 2015 | EP |
2427468 | Mar 2011 | GB |
2472927 | May 2011 | GB |
WO-9823948 | Jun 1998 | WO |
WO-9920649 | Apr 1999 | WO |
WO-2007048459 | May 2007 | WO |
WO-2007079229 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2007079250 | Jul 2007 | WO |
WO-2008157257 | Dec 2008 | WO |
WO-2007079250 | Mar 2009 | WO |
WO-2009051734 | Apr 2009 | WO |
WO-2009088933 | Jul 2009 | WO |
WO-2009140326 | Nov 2009 | WO |
WO-2010123608 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2010124227 | Oct 2010 | WO |
WO-2010132795 | Nov 2010 | WO |
WO-2012016136 | Feb 2012 | WO |
WO-2012094642 | Jul 2012 | WO |
WO-2012103025 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2012116073 | Aug 2012 | WO |
WO-2013003624 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013006828 | Jan 2013 | WO |
WO-2013036620 | Mar 2013 | WO |
WO-2013131001 | Sep 2013 | WO |
WO-2015153816 | Oct 2015 | WO |
Entry |
---|
Sharma, H. et al. Apr. 2011, published online Dec. 9, 2010. Unconventional low-cost fabrication and patterning techniques for point of care diagnostics. Annals of Biomedical Engineering 39(4): 1313-1327; specif, pp. 1313, 1316, 1317. |
Lawrence, M.B. et al. 1991. Leukocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins. Cell 65: 859-873. |
Martinez, A.W. et al. 2008. Three-dimensional microfluidic devices fabricated in layered paper and tape. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (PNAS) 105(50): 19606-19611. |
Kaladhar, K. et al. 2004. Supported cell mimetic monolayers and their interaction with blood. Langmuir 20: 11115-11122; specif, pp. 11115, 11116. |
Pappas, D. et al. 2007. Cellular separations: a review of new challenges in analytical chemistry. Analytics Chimica Acts 601: 26-35; specif, pp. 27, 29, 32. |
Krasowska, M. et al. Wetting films in attachment of the colliding bubble. Advances in Colloid and Interface Sciences 134-135: 138-150; specif, pp. 138, 144, 145. |
Johnson, S.J. et al. 1991. Structure ofsn adsorbed dimyristoylphosphstidylcholine bilayer measured with specular reflection of neutrons. Biophysics Journal 59: 289-294; specif, pp. 289, 293. |
Co-pending U.S. Appl. No. 16/698,699, inventors Chang; Ying-Chih et al., filed Nov. 27, 2019. |
Notice of allowance dated Sep. 1, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/128,354. |
Notice of allowance dated Nov. 3, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/128,354. |
Office action dated Mar. 23, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/128,354. |
Park, et al. Continuous focusing of microparticles using inertial lift force and vorticity via multi-orifice microfluidic channels. Lab on a Chip 9.7 (2009): 939-948. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/378,938 Office Action dated Feb. 14, 2019. |
U.S. Appl. No. 15/378,938 Office Action dated Oct. 29, 2019. |
Adams, et al. Highly efficient circulating tumor cell isolation from whole blood and label-free enumeration using polymer-based microfluidics with an integrated conductivity sensor. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 9, 2008;130(27):8633-41. doi: 10.1021/ja8015022. Epub Jun. 17, 2008. |
Adams, et al. Integrated acoustic and magnetic separation in microfluidic channels. Appl Phys Lett. Dec. 21, 2009;95(25):254103. |
Allard, et al. Tumor cells circulate in the peripheral blood of all major carcinomas but not in healthy subjects or patients with nonmalignant diseases. Clin Cancer Res. Oct. 15, 2004;10(20):6897-904. |
Balasubramanian, et al. Confocal images of circulating tumor cells obtained using a methodology and technology that removes normal cells. Mol Pharm. Sep.-Oct. 2009;6(5):1402-8. doi: 10.1021/mp9000519. |
Balic, et al. Micrometastasis: detection methods and clinical importance. Cancer Biomarkers 9.1-6 (2011): 397-419. |
Barkley, et al. Bubble-induced detachment of affinity-adsorbed erythrocytes. Biotechnol Appl Biochem. Oct. 2004;40(Pt 2):145-9. |
Barradas, et al. Towards the biological understanding of CTC: capture technologies, definitions and potential to create metastasis. Cancers 5.4 (2013): 1619-1642. |
Bhagat, et al. Continuous particle separation in spiral microchannels using Dean flows and differential migration. Lab Chip. Nov. 2008;8(11):1906-14. doi: 10.1039/b807107a. Epub Sep. 24, 2008. |
Burgoyne. A method for rapid fabrication of microfluidic devices. Chips and Tips. Royal Society of Chemistry. (Jun. 30, 2009). Retrieved on Feb. 6, 2019, Retrieved from the internet: URL: https://blogs.rsc.org/chipsandtips/2009/06/30a-method-for-rapid-fabrication-of-microfluidic-devices/ pp. 1-6. |
Cao, et al. Detachment strategies for affinity-adsorbed cells. Enzyme and microbial technology. 2002; 31: 153-160. |
Cavalli, et al. Micro- and nanobubbles: a versatile non-viral platform for gene delivery. Int J Pharm. Nov. 18, 2013;456(2):437-45. doi: 10.1016/j.ijpharm.2013.08.041. Epub Sep. 2, 2013. |
Cima, et al. Label-free isolation of circulating tumor cells in microfluidic devices: Current research and perspectives. Biomicrofluidics. Jan. 24, 2013;7(1):11810. doi: 10.1063/1.4780062. eCollection 2013. |
Cohen, et al. Relationship of circulating tumor cells to tumor response, progression-free survival, and overall survival in patients with metastatic colorectal cancer. J Clin Oncol. Jul. 1, 2008;26(19):3213-21. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2007.15.8923. |
Cremer, et al. Writing and erasing barriers to lateral mobility into fluid phospholipid bilayers. Langmuir 15.11 (1999): 3893-3896. |
Dainiak, et al. Cell chromatography: separation of different microbial cells using IMAC supermacroporous monolithic columns Biotechnol Prog. Mar.-Apr. 2005;21(2):644-9. |
De Giorgi, et al. Application of a filtration- and isolation-by-size technique for the detection of circulating tumor cells in cutaneous melanoma. J Invest Dermatol. Oct. 2010;130(10):2440-7. doi: 10.1038/jid.2010.141. Epub Jun. 10, 2010. |
Dharmasiri, et al. High-throughput selection, enumeration, electrokinetic manipulation, and molecular profiling of low-abundance circulating tumor cells using a microfluidic system. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2011;83(6):2301-9. doi: 10.1021/ac103172y. Epub Feb. 14, 2011. |
Dickson, et al. Efficient capture of circulating tumor cells with a novel immunocytochemical microfluidic device. Biomicrofluidics. Sep. 2011;5(3):34119-3411915. doi: 10.1063/1.3623748. Epub Aug. 22, 2011. |
Extended European Search Report and Search Opinion dated Feb. 28, 2017 for European Patent Application No. EP15773744.6. |
Fehm, et al. Cytogenetic evidence that circulating epithelial cells in patients with carcinoma are malignant. Clin Cancer Res. Jul. 2002;8(7):2073-84. |
Fehm, et al. HER2 status of circulating tumor cells in patients with metastatic breast cancer: a prospective, multicenter trial. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Nov. 2010;124(2):403-12. doi: 10.1007/s10549-010-1163-x. Epub Sep. 22, 2010. |
Garstecki, et al. Formation of droplets and bubbles in a microfluidic T-junction-scaling and mechanism of break-up. Lab Chip. Mar. 2006;6(3):437-46. Epub Jan. 25, 2006. |
Geers, et al. Targeted liposome-loaded microbubbles for cell-specific ultrasound-triggered drug delivery. Small. Dec. 9, 2013;9(23):4027-35. doi: 10.1002/smll.201300161. Epub Jun. 5, 2013. |
Glasmastar, et al. Protein adsorption on supported phospholipid bilayers. J Colloid Interface Sci. Feb. 1, 2002;246(1):40-7. |
Gomez-Suarez, et al. Analysis of bacterial detachment from substratum surfaces by the passage of air-liquid interfaces. Appl Environ Microbiol. Jun. 2001;67(6):2531-7. |
Hong, et al. Detecting circulating tumor cells: current challenges and new trends. Theranostics 3.6 (2013): 377-394. |
“Hsiung, et al. A planar interdigitated ring electrode array via dielectrophoresis for uniform patterning of cells. Biosens Bioelectron. Dec. 1, 2008;24(4):869-875.” |
Hsu, et al. Microvortex for focusing, guiding and sorting of particles. Lab Chip. Dec. 2008;8(12):2128-34. doi: 10.1039/b813434k. Epub Oct. 30, 2008. |
Kaizuka, et al. Structure and dynamics of supported intermembrane junctions. Biophys J. Feb. 2004;86(2):905-12. |
Kang, et al. A combined micromagnetic-microfluidic device for rapid capture and culture of rare circulating tumor cells. Lab Chip. Jun. 21, 2012;12(12):2175-81. doi: 10.1039/c2lc40072c. Epub Mar. 28, 2012. |
Kang, et al. Isomagnetophoresis to discriminate subtle difference in magnetic susceptibility. Journal of the American Chemical Society 130.2 (2008): 396-397. |
Kim, et al. Rapid prototyping of microfluidic systems using a PDMS/polymer tape composite. Lab Chip. May 7, 2009;9(9):1290-3. doi: 10.1039/b818389a. Epub Feb. 10, 2009. |
Krivacic, et al. A rare-cell detector for cancer. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA. Jul. 20, 2004;101(29):10501-4. Epub Jul. 12, 2004. |
Kuo, et al. Deformability considerations in filtration of biological cells. Lab Chip. Apr. 7, 2010;10(7):837-42. doi: 10.1039/b922301k. Epub Jan. 19, 2010. |
Li, et al. Negative enrichment of target cells by microfluidic affinity chromatography. Anal Chem. Oct. 15, 2011;83(20):7863-9. doi: 10.1021/ac201752s. Epub Sep. 22, 2011. |
Mahalingam, et al. Formation, stability, and mechanical properties of bovine serum albumin stabilized air bubbles produced using coaxial electrohydrodynamic atomization. Langmuir. Jun. 17, 2014;30(23):6694-703. doi: 10.1021/la5011715. Epub Jun. 4, 2014. |
Office action dated Jul. 26, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 15/072,287. |
Office action dated Aug. 2, 2017 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/836,390. |
Olmos, et al. Circulating tumour cell (CTC) counts as intermediate end points in castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC): a single-centre experience. Ann Oncol. Jan. 2009;20(1):27-33. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdn544. Epub Aug. 11, 2008. |
Ozkumur, et al. Inertial focusing for tumor antigen-dependent and -independent sorting of rare circulating tumor cells. Sci Transl Med. Apr. 3, 2013;5(179):179ra47. doi: 10.1126/scitranslmed.3005616. |
Panchision, et al. Optimized flow cytometric analysis of central nervous system tissue reveals novel functional relationships among cells expressing CD133, CD15, and CD24. Stem Cells. Jun. 2007;25(6):1560-70. Epub Mar. 1, 2007. |
PCT/US2015/023956 International Search Report dated Sep. 30, 2015. |
Schiro, et al. Sensitive and high-throughput isolation of rare cells from peripheral blood with ensemble-decision aliquot ranking. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. May 7, 2012;51(19):4618-22. doi: 10.1002/anie.201108695. Epub Feb. 22, 2012. |
Shah, et al. Biopolymer system for cell recovery from microfluidic cell capture devices. Anal Chem. Apr. 17, 2012;84(8):3682-8. doi: 10.1021/ac300190j. Epub Apr. 3, 2012. |
Shih, et al. Flow-focusing regimes for accelerated production of monodisperse drug-loadable microbubbles toward clinical-scale applications. Lab Chip. Dec. 21, 2013;13(24):4816-26. doi: 10.1039/c3lc51016f. |
Singer, et al. The fluid mosaic model of the structure of cell membranes. Science. Feb. 18, 1972;175(4023):720-31. |
Stott, et al. Isolation of circulating tumor cells using a microvortex-generating herringbone-chip. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. Oct. 26, 2010;107(43):18392-7. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1012539107. Epub Oct. 7, 2010. |
Stroock, et al. Chaotic mixer for microchannels. Science. Jan. 25, 2002;295(5555):647-51. |
Sun, et al. High-performance size-based microdevice for the detection of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood in rectal cancer patients. PLoS One. Sep. 16, 2013;8(9):e75865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0075865. eCollection 2013. |
Tan, et al. Versatile label free biochip for the detection of circulating tumor cells from peripheral blood in cancer patients. Biosens Bioelectron. Dec. 15, 2010;26(4):1701-5. doi: 10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.054. Epub Jul. 22, 2010. |
Thorsteinsson, et al. The clinical significance of circulating tumor cells in non-metastatic colorectal cancer-a review. European Journal of Surgical Oncology (EJSO) 37.6 (2011): 459-465. |
Triffo, et al. Monitoring lipid anchor organization in cell membranes by PIE-FCCS. J Am Chem Soc. Jul. 4, 2012;134(26):10833-42. doi: 10.1021/ja300374c. Epub Jun. 14, 2012. |
Tseng, et al. Tethered fibronectin liposomes on supported lipid bilayers as a prepackaged controlled-release platform for cell-based assays. Biomacromolecules. Aug. 13, 2012;13(8):2254-62. doi: 10.1021/bm300426u. Epub Jul. 11, 2012. |
Vona, et al. Isolation by size of epithelial tumor cells : a new method for the immunomorphological and molecular characterization of circulating tumor cells. Am J Pathol. Jan. 2000;156(1):57-63. |
Wang, et al. Highly efficient capture of circulating tumor cells by using nanostructured silicon substrates with integrated chaotic micromixers. Angew Chem Int Ed Engl. Mar. 21, 2011;50(13):3084-8.doi: 10.1002/anie.201005853. Epub Mar. 4, 2011. |
Wang, et al. Open-tubular capillary cell affinity chromatography: single and tandem blood cell separation. Anal Chem. Mar. 15, 2008;80(6):2118-24. doi: 10.1021/ac702553w. Epub Feb. 21, 2008. |
Wang, et al. Shear stress induces endothelial differentiation from a murine embryonic mesenchymal progenitor cell line. Arterioscler Thromb Vase Biol. Sep. 2005;25(9):1817-23. Epub Jun. 30, 2005. |
Wu, et al. Antibody conjugated supported lipid bilayer for capturing and purification of viable tumor cells in blood for subsequent cell culture. Biomaterials. Jul. 2013;34(21):5191-9. doi: 10.1016/j.biomaterials.2013.03.096. Epub Apr. 21, 2013. |
Xu, et al. A cancer detection platform which measures telomerase activity from live circulating tumor cells captured on a microfilter. Cancer Res. Aug. 15, 2010;70(16):6420-6. doi: 10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-0686. Epub Jul. 27, 2010. |
Yang et al. Fabrication of Phospholipid Bilayer-Coated Microchannels for On-Chip Immunoassays. Anal Chem 73(2):165-169 (Jan. 15, 2001). |
Alix-Panabieres, et al. Challenges in circulating tumour cell research. Nat Rev Cancer. Sep. 2014;14(9):623-31. doi: 10.1038/nrc3820. Epub Jul. 31, 2014. |
Ananthanarayanan, et al. Neural stem cell adhesion and proliferation on phospholipid bilayers functionalized with RGD peptides. Biomaterials, Elsevier Science Publishers BV., Barking GB, vol. 31, No. 33, Nov. 1, 2010, pp. 8706-8715. |
Antolovic, et al. Heterogeneous detection of circulating tumor cells in patients with colorectal cancer by immunomagnetic enrichment using different EpCAM-specific antibodies. BMC Biotechnol. Apr. 28, 2010;10:35. doi: 10.1186/1472-6750-10-35. |
Baeuerle, et al. EpCAM (CD326) finding its role in cancer. Br J Cancer. Feb. 12, 2007;96(3):417-23. Epub Jan. 9, 2007. |
Balzar, et al. Epidermal growth factor-like repeats mediate lateral and reciprocal interactions of Ep-CAM molecules in homophilic adhesions. Mol Cell Biol. Apr. 2001;21(7):2570-80. |
Chaudry, et al. EpCAM an immunotherapeutic target for gastrointestinal malignancy: current experience and future challenges. Br J Cancer. Apr. 10, 2007;96(7):1013-9. Epub Feb. 27, 2007. |
Chen, et al. Generation and characterization of monoclonal antibodies against dengue virus type 1 for epitope mapping and serological detection by epitope-based peptide antigens. Clin Vaccine Immunol. Apr. 2007;14(4):404-11. Epub Feb. 7, 2007. |
Cornell, et al. A biosensor that uses ion-channel switches. Letters to Nauture. Jun. 5, 1997. vol. 387. p. 580-583. |
European search report and written opinion dated May 2, 2015 for EP Application No. 12805303.0. |
“European search report dated Jan. 29, 2016 for EP 15182577.5”. |
Gervais, Luc. Capillary Microfluidic Chips for Point-of-Care Testing: from Research Tools to Decentralized Medical Diagnostics. InfoScience. 2011. Thesis 5047. Available at http://infoscience.epfl.ch/record/165376/files/EPFL_TH5047.pdf. |
Holmen, et al. Heterogeneity of human nasal vascular and sinusoidal endothelial cells from the inferior turbinate. Am J Respir Cell Mol Biol. Jan. 2005;32(1):18-27. Epub Oct. 21, 2004. |
Huang, et al. Type I Collagen-Functionalized Supported Lipid Bilayer as a Cell Culture Platform. Biomacromolecules, vol. 11, No. 5, May 10, 2010, pp. 1231-1240. |
International search report and written opinion dated May 30, 2013 for PCT Application No. PCT/US2013/028667 with publication. |
International search report and written opinion dated Dec. 10, 2012 for PCT/US2012/044701. |
Ishihara, et al. Photoinduced graft polymerization of 2-methacryloyloxyethyl phosphorylcholine on polyethylene membrane surface for obtaining blood cell adhesion resistance. Colloids and Surfaces B: Biointerfaces, vol. 18, No. 3-4, Oct. 1, 2000, pp. 325-355. |
Johnson, et al. Structure of an adsorbed dimyristoylphosphatidylcholine bilayer measured with specular reflection of neutrons. Biophys J. Feb. 1991;59(2):289-94. |
Kahn, et al. Enumeration of circulating tumor cells in the blood of breast cancer patients after filtration enrichment: correlation with disease stage. Breast Cancer Res Treat. Aug. 2004;86(3):237-47. |
Kaladhar, et al. Cell mimetic lateral stabilization of outer cell mimetic bilayer on polymer surfaces by peptide bonding and their blood compatibility. J Biomed Mater Res A. Oct. 2006;79(1):23-35. |
Kaladhar, et al. Supported cell mimetic monolayers and their interaction with blood. Langmuir. Dec. 7, 2004;20(25):11115-22. |
Karabacak, et al. Microfluidic, marker-free isolation of circulating tumor cells from blood samples. Nat Protoc. Mar. 2014;9(3):694-710. doi: 10.1038/nprot.2014.044. Epub Feb. 27, 2014. |
Lawrence, et al. Leukocytes roll on a selectin at physiologic flow rates: distinction from and prerequisite for adhesion through integrins.Cell. May 31, 1991;65(5):859-73. |
Lin, et al. Adhesion of antibody-functionalized polymersomes. Langmuir. Apr. 25, 2006;22(9):3975-9. |
Lin, J.J et al. 2006. Adhesion of antibody-functionalized polymersomes. Langmuir 22: 3975-3979. specif, pp. 3975, 3979. |
Nagrath, et al. Isolation of rare circulating tumour cells in cancer patients by microchip technology. Nature. Dec. 20, 2007;450(7173):1235-9. |
NCBI Direct Submission. NM_002354.2. Homo sapiens epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EPCAM), mRNA. Feb. 5, 2012. [Retrieved from the Internet: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/nuccore/218505669?sat=15&satkey=5763417. |
Notice of allowance dated Jul. 7, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,265. |
“Office action dated Jan. 21, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,265.” |
Office action dated Mar. 9, 2016 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,265. |
“Office action dated May 29, 2015 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,265.” |
“Office action dated Mar. 23, 16 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/128,345”. |
“Office action dated Mar. 9, 16 for U.S. Appl. No. 14/065,265”. |
Pantel, et al. Detection, clinical relevance and specific biological properties of disseminating tumour cells. Nat Rev Cancer. May 2008;8(5):329-40. doi: 10.1038/nrc2375. |
Patriarca, et al. Epithelial cell adhesion molecule expression (CD326) in cancer: a short review. Cancer Treat Rev. Feb. 2012;38(1):68-75. doi: 10.1016/j.ctrv.2011.04.002. Epub May 14, 2011. |
Phillips, et al. Enrichment of cancer cells using aptamers immobilized on a microfluidic channel. Anal Chem. Feb. 1, 2009;81(3):1033-9. doi: 10.1021/ac802092j. |
Phillips, J.A. et al. 2009. Enrichment of cancer cells using aptamers immobilized on a microfluidic channel. Analytical Chemistry81 : 1 033-1 039. specif, pp. 1 034, 1 035, 1 036, 1 037, 1 038. |
Ruf, et al. Characterisation of the new EpCAM-specific antibody HO-3: implications for trifunctional antibody immunotherapy of cancer. Br J Cancer. Aug. 6, 2007;97(3):315-21. Epub Jul. 10, 2007. |
Xu, et al. Aptamer-based microfluidic device for enrichment, sorting, and detection of multiple cancer cells. Anal Chem. Sep. 1, 2009;81(17):7436-42. doi: 10.1021/ac9012072. |
Xu, Y. et al. 2009. Aptamer-based microfluidic device for enrichment, sorting, and detection of multiple cancer cells. AnalyticalChemistry 81: 7436-7442. specif. pp. 7436, 7437, 7439, 7440. |
Yurke, et al. A DNA-fuelled molecular machine made of DNA. Nature. Aug. 10, 2000;406(6796):605-8. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210088514 A1 | Mar 2021 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61606220 | Mar 2012 | US | |
61502844 | Jun 2011 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15378938 | Dec 2016 | US |
Child | 16832396 | US | |
Parent | 14128354 | US | |
Child | 15378938 | US |