Carbide cutting insert

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8512882
  • Patent Number
    8,512,882
  • Date Filed
    Monday, February 19, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, August 20, 2013
    11 years ago
Abstract
Cutting tools and cutting inserts having a wear resistant coating on a substrate comprising a metal carbide particle and a binder. For certain applications, a cutting insert having a wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride and a binder comprising ruthenium may provide a greater service life. The wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride may have a thickness of from 1 to 10 microns. In another embodiment, the cutting tool comprises a cemented carbide substrate with a binder comprising at least one of iron, nickel and cobalt.
Description
TECHNICAL FIELD

The present invention is directed to embodiments of a cutting tool comprising a wear resistant coating on a substrate. The substrate comprises metal carbides in a binder, wherein the binder comprises ruthenium. In one embodiment, the cutting tool further comprises a wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride. In a specific embodiment, the cutting tool comprises a hafnium carbon nitride wear resistant coating on a substrate comprising tungsten carbide (WC) in a binder comprising cobalt and ruthenium. Such embodiments may be particularly useful for machining difficult to machine materials, such as, but not limited to, titanium and titanium alloys, nickel and nickel alloys, super alloys, and other exotic materials.


BACKGROUND

A common mode of failure for cutting inserts is cracking due to thermal shock. Thermal shock is even more common in the more difficult machining processes, such as high productivity machining processes and machining of materials with a high hot hardness, for example. In order to reduce the buildup of heat in cutting inserts, coolants are used in machining operations. However, the use of coolants during the machining operation contributes to thermal cycling that may also contribute to failure of the cutting insert by thermal shock.


Thermal cycling also occurs in milling applications where the milling cutter gets hot when actually cutting the work material and then cools when not cutting the work material. Such thermal cycling of heating and cooling results in sharp temperature gradients in the cutting inserts, and the resulting in differences in expansion of different portions of the insert causing internal stresses and initiation of cracks in the cutting inserts. There is a need to develop a novel carbide cutting insert that can not only maintain efficient cutting performance during the high-hot hardness machining process, but also improve the tool life by resisting thermal cracking.


The service life of a cutting insert or cutting tool is also a function of the wear properties of the cemented carbide. One way to increase cutting tool life is to employ cutting inserts made of materials with improved combinations of strength, toughness, and abrasion/erosion resistance. Cutting inserts comprising cemented carbide substrates for such applications is predicated on the fact that cemented carbides offer very attractive combinations of strength, fracture toughness, and wear resistance (such properties that are extremely important to the efficient functioning of the boring or drilling bit). Cemented carbides are metal-matrix composites comprising carbides of one or more of the transition metals as the hard particles or dispersed phase and cobalt, nickel, or iron (or alloys of these metals) as the binder or continuous phase. Among the different possible hard particle-binder combinations, cemented carbides comprising tungsten carbide (WC) as the hard particle and cobalt as the binder phase are the most commonly used for cutting tools and inserts for machining operations.


The bulk properties of cemented carbides depend upon, among other features, two microstructural parameters, namely, the average hard particle grain size and the weight or volume fraction of the hard particles and/or the binder. In general, the hardness and wear resistance increases as the grain size decreases and/or the binder content decreases. On the other hand, fracture toughness increases as the grain size increases and/or as the binder content increases. Thus there is a trade-off between wear resistance and fracture toughness when selecting a cemented carbide grade for any application. As wear resistance increases, fracture toughness typically decreases and vice versa.


In addition, alloying agents may be added to the binder. A limited number of cemented carbide cutting tools or cutting inserts have ruthenium added to the binder. The binder may additionally comprise other alloying compounds, such as TiC and TaC/NbC, to refine the properties of the substrate for particular applications.


Ruthenium (Ru) is a member of the platinum group and is a hard, lustrous, white metal that has a melting point of approximately 2,500° C. Ruthenium does not tarnish at room temperatures, and may be used as an effective hardener, creating alloys that are extremely wear resistant. It has been found that ruthenium in a cobalt binder of a cemented carbide used in a cutting tool or cutting insert improves the resistance to thermal cracking and significantly reduces crack propagation along the edges and into the body of the cutting tool or cutting insert. Typically commercially available cutting tools and cutting inserts may include a concentration of ruthenium in the binder phase of cemented carbide substrates in the ranges of approximately 3% to 30%, by weight.


A cutting insert comprising a cemented carbide substrate may comprise a single or multiple layer coating on the surface to enhance its cutting performance. Methods for coating cemented carbide cutting tools include chemical vapor deposition (CVD), physical vapor deposition (PVD) and diamond coating. Most often, CVD is used to apply the coating to cutting inserts due to the well-known advantages of CVD coatings in cutting tools.


An example of PVD coating technologies, Leyendecker et al. discloses, in a U.S. Pat. No. 6,352,627, a PVD coating method and device, which is based on magnetron sputter-coating techniques to produce refractory thin films or coats on cutting inserts, can deliver three consecutive voltage supplies during the coating operation, promoting an optimally enhanced tonization process that results in good coating adhesion on the substrate, even if the substrate surface provided is rough, for example because the surface was sintered, ground or jet abrasion treated.


An example of CVD coating technologies, Punola et al. discloses, in a U.S. Pat. No. 5,462,013, a CVD coating apparatus that uses a unique technique to control the reactivity of a gaseous reactant stream at different coating zones in the CVD reactor. As a result, the CVD coating produced has greatly improved uniformity in both composition and thickness.


An example of hard-metal coating developments and applications in cutting inserts with regular carbide substrates, Leverenz and Bost from Stellram, an Allegheny Technologies Company located at One Teledyne Place, LaVergne, Tenn., USA 37086 and also the assignee of this invention, describes in a recently granted U.S. Pat. No. 6,929,851, a surface etching technology that is used to enhance the CVD or PVD coating including HfCN coating on the regular carbide substrates. Additional examples of hard-metal coating developments and applications in cutting inserts with regular carbide substrates are U.S. Pat. No. 4,268,569 by Hale in 1981, U.S. Pat. No. 6,447,890 by Leverenz et al. in 2002, U.S. Pat. No. 6,617,058 by Schier in 2003, U.S. Pat. No. 6,827,975 by Leverenz et al. in 2004 and U.S. Pat. No. 6,884,496 by Westphal and Scottke in 2005.


SUMMARY

The invention is directed to cutting tools and cutting inserts comprising a substrate comprising metal carbide particles and a binder and at least one wear resistant coating on the substrate. In one embodiment the wear resistant coating comprises hafnium carbon nitride and the binder comprises ruthenium. In another embodiment, the wear resistant coating consists essentially of hafnium carbon nitride. The cutting tools of the invention may comprise a single wear resistant coating or multiple wear resistant coatings. The wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride may have a thickness of from 1 to 10 microns. In embodiments, the cutting tool comprises a cemented carbide substrate with a binder comprising at least one of iron, nickel and cobalt.


As used in this specification and the appended claims, the singular forms “a” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a wear resistant coating” may include more than one coating or a multiple coating.


Unless otherwise indicated, all numbers expressing quantities of ingredients, time, temperatures, and so forth used in the present specification and claims are to be understood as being modified in all instances by the term “about.” Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained by the present invention. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques. Notwithstanding that the numerical ranges and parameters setting forth the broad scope of the invention are approximations, the numerical values set forth in the specific examples are reported as precisely as possible. Any numerical value, however, may inherently contain certain errors necessarily resulting from the standard deviation found in their respective testing measurements.


It is to be understood that this invention is not limited to specific compositions, components or process steps disclosed herein, as such may vary. It is also to be understood that the terminology used herein is for the purpose of describing particular embodiments only, and is not intended to be limiting.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 is a bar graph comparing the experimental results of Tool Wear Test 1 for three cutting inserts with different coatings machining Inconel 718;



FIG. 2 is a bar graph comparing the experimental results of Tool Wear Test 2 for three cutting inserts with different coatings machining Stainless Steel 316;



FIG. 3 is a bar graph comparing the experimental results of Tool Wear Test 3 for three cutting inserts with different coatings machining Titanium 6V;



FIGS. 4
a,
4
b, and 4c are photomicrographs of three cutting inserts with different coatings showing the cracks and wear formed during Thermal Cracking Test 1; and



FIGS. 5
a,
5
b, and 5c are photomicrographs of three cutting inserts with different coatings showing the cracks and wear formed during Thermal Cracking Test 2.





DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Embodiments of the invention include cutting tools and cutting inserts comprising substrates comprising cemented carbides. The binders of cemented carbides comprise at least one of iron, nickel, and cobalt, and in embodiments of the present invention the binder additionally comprises ruthenium. Ruthenium may be present in any quantity effective to have a beneficial effect on the properties of the cutting tool, such as a concentration of ruthenium in the binder from 1% to 30%, by weight. In certain embodiments, the concentration of ruthenium in the binder may be from 3% to 30%, by weight, from 8% to 20%, or even from 10% to 15%, by weight.


The invention is based on a unique discovery that applying a specific hard metal coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride (HfCN) to a cutting tool or cutting insert comprising a cemented carbide comprising ruthenium in the binder phase can reduce the initiation and propagation of thermal cracks during metal machining. The hafnium carbon nitride coating may be a single coating on the substrate or one coating of multiple coatings on the substrate, such as a first coating, an intermediate coating, or a final coating. Embodiments of cutting tools comprising the additional coating may include coatings applied by either PVD or CVD and may include coating comprising at least one of a metal carbide, a metal nitride, a metal boride, and a metal oxide of a metal selected from groups IIIA, IVB, VB, and VIB of the periodic table. For example, a coating on the cutting tools and cutting inserts of the present invention include hafnium carbon nitride and, for example, may also comprise at least one coating of titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium carbide (TiC), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN), titanium aluminum nitride plus carbon (TiAlN+C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), titanium aluminum nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (TiAlN+WC/C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), aluminum titanium nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (AlTiN+WC/C), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), α-alumina oxide, titanium diboride (TiB2), tungsten carbide carbon (WC/C), chromium nitride (CrN), aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN), hafnium carbon nitride (HfCN), alone or in any combinations. In certain embodiments, any coating may be from 1 to 10 micrometers thick; though it may be preferable in specific applications for the hafnium carbon nitride coating to be from 2 to 6 micrometers thick.


In certain embodiments of the cutting insert of the invention, coatings comprising at least one of zirconium nitride (ZrN), zirconium carbon nitride (ZrCN), boron nitride (BN), or boron carbon nitride (BCN) may be used in combination with the hafnium carbon nitride coating or replacing the hafnium carbon nitride coating. In certain other embodiments, the cutting insert may comprise a wear resistant coating consisting essentially of a coating selected from zirconium nitride (ZrN), zirconium carbon nitride (ZrCN), boron nitride (BN), or boron carbon nitride (BCN).


The coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride, the coating consisting essentially of hafnium carbon nitride, or the coating comprising zirconium nitride, zirconium carbon nitride, boron nitride, or boron carbon nitride coating applied to the cutting tool or cutting insert of the present invention produce coatings with enhanced hardness, reduced friction, chemical stability, wear resistance, thermal crack resistance and prolonged tool life.


The present invention also includes methods of coating a substrate. Embodiments of the method of the present invention include applying the coatings described above on a cemented carbide substrate by either CVD or PVD, wherein the cemented carbide substrate comprises hard particles and a binder and the binder comprises ruthenium. The method may include treating the substrate prior to coating the substrate. The treating prior to coating comprises at least one of electropolishing, shot peening, microblasting, wet blasting, grinding, brushing, jet abrading and compressed air blasting. Pre-coating surface treatments on any coated (CVD or PVD) carbide cutting inserts may reduce the cobalt capping effect of substrates. Examples of pre-coating surface treatments include wet blasting (U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,635,247 and 5,863,640), grinding (U.S. Pat. No. 6,217,992 B1), electropolishing (U.S. Pat. No. 5,665,431), brushing (U.S. Pat. No. 5,863,640), etc. Improper pre-coating surface treatment may lead to poor adhesion of a CVD or PVD coating on the substrate comprising ruthenium in the binder, thus resulting in premature failure of CVD or PVD coatings. This is primarily due to the fact that the CVD and PVD coating layers are thin and the surface irregularities due to cobalt capping are more pronounced in a carbide substrate comprising ruthenium.


Embodiments of the method may comprise optional post-coating surface treatments of coated carbide cutting inserts may further improve the surface quality of wear resistant coating. There are a number of methods for post-coating surface treatments, for example, shot peening, Japanese Patent No. 02254144, incorporated by reference, which is based on the speed injection of small metal particles having a spherical grain shape with grain size in a range of 10-2000 μm. Another example of post-coating surface treatment is compressed-air blasting, European Patent No. 1,198,609 B1, incorporated by reference, which uses an inorganic blasting agent, like Al2O3, with a very fine grain size ranging from 1 to 100 μm. Another example of post coating treatment is brushing, U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,609 B2, incorporated by reference, which uses a nylon straw brush containing SiC grains. A gentle wet blasting can also be used as a post-coating surface treatment to create a smooth coating layer, U.S. Pat. No. 6,638,609 B2, incorporated by reference. In general, a surface treatment, such as, but not limited to, blasting, shot peening, compressed air blasting, or brushing, on coated inserts comprising ruthenium in the binder can improve the properties of the surface of the coatings.


In embodiments of both the method and the cutting inserts, the cemented carbide in the substrate may comprise metal carbides of one or more elements belonging to groups IVB through VIB of the periodic table. Preferably, the cemented carbides comprise at least one transition metal carbide selected from titanium carbide, chromium carbide, vanadium carbide, zirconium carbide, hafnium carbide, tantalum carbide, molybdenum carbide, niobium carbide, and tungsten carbide. The carbide particles preferably comprise about 60 to about 98 weight percent of the total weight of the cemented carbide material in each region. The carbide particles are embedded within a matrix of a binder that preferably constitutes about 2 to about 40 weight percent of the total weight of the cemented carbide.


The binder of the cemented carbide comprises ruthenium and at least one of cobalt, nickel, iron. The binder also may comprise, for example, elements such as tungsten, chromium, titanium, tantalum, vanadium, molybdenum, niobium, zirconium, hafnium, and carbon up to the solubility limits of these elements in the binder. Additionally, the binder may contain up to 5 weight percent of elements such as copper, manganese, silver, and aluminum. One skilled in the art will recognize that any or all of the constituents of the cemented hard particle material may be introduced in elemental form, as compounds, and/or as master alloys.


EXAMPLES

The following examples are given to further describe some details of this invention regarding the performance tests of cutting inserts comprising a substrate comprising ruthenium in the binder with CVD coatings.


Example 1
Results of Wear Test (GX20 Substrate)

Stellram's GX20™, a trademark of Allegheny Technologies, Inc. is a cemented carbide powder comprising ruthenium. GX20™ may be used to prepare a tough grade of cemented carbide for use in machining P45/K35 materials according to ISO standard. The nominal chemical composition and properties of the substrate of Stellram's GX20™ cutting inserts is shown in Table 1. The major constituents in GX20™ metal powders include tungsten carbide, cobalt and ruthenium.









TABLE 1







Properties of the GX20 ™ Substrate











Chemical






Compositions

Transverse


(weight
Average
Rupture


percent)
Grain Size
Strength
Density
Hardness













WC
Co
Ru
(μm)
(N/mm2)
(g/cm3)
(HRA)





89.1
9.5
1.4
2.5
3500
14.55
89.5









The metal powders in Table 1 were mixed and then wet blended by a ball mill over a 72-hour period. After drying, the blended compositions were compressed into compacted green bodies of the designed cutting insert under a pressure of 1-2 tons/cm2. The compacted green bodies of the tungsten carbide cutting inserts were sintered in a furnace to close the pores in the green bodies and build up the bond between the hard particles to increase the strength and hardness.


In particular, to effectively reduce the micro-porosity of the sintered substrate and ensure the consistent sintering quality of GX20™ carbide cutting inserts, the sinter-HIP, i.e. high-pressure sintering process, was used to introduce a pressure phase following the dewaxing, presintering and low-pressure nitrogen (N2) sintering cycle. The sintering procedure for GX20™ carbide cutting inserts was performed with the following major sequential steps:

    • a dewaxing cycle starts at room temperature with a ramping speed of 2° C./min until reaching 400° C. and then holds for approximate 90 minutes;
    • a presintering cycle, which breaks down the oxides of Co, WO, Ti, Ta, Nb, etc., starts with a ramping speed of 4° C./min until reaching 1,200° C. and then holds at this temperature for 60 minutes;
    • a low pressure nitrogen (N2) cycle is then introduced at 1,350° C. during the temperature ramping from 1,200° C. to 1,400° C./1,450° C., i.e. sintering temperature, and then holds at this sintering temperature at a low nitrogen pressure of about 2 torrs for approximate 30 minutes;
    • a sinter-HIP process is then initiated while at the sintering temperature, i.e. 1,400/1450° C., during the process argon (Ar) pressure is introduced and rises to 760 psi in 30 minutes, and then the sinter-HIP process holds at this pressure for additional 30 minutes; and finally
    • a cooling cycle is carried out to let the heated green bodies of the GX20 carbide cutting inserts cool down to room temperature while inside the furnace.


Thus obtained GX20™ carbide cutting inserts shrunk into the desired sintered size and became non-porous. Followed by the sintering process, the sintered tungsten carbide cutting inserts may be ground and edge-honed.


Then three different CVD multilayer coatings were applied to the GX20 substrates, as shown in Table 2 for details.









TABLE 2







CVD Coatings









Multilayer
Individual



Coatings
Coating
Chemical Reactions





TiN—TiC—TiN
First Coating: TiN
H2 + N2 + Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4)



Second Coating: TiC
H2 + TiCl4 + CH4



Third Coating: TiN
H2 + N2 + Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4)


TiN—HfCN—TiN
First Coating: TiN
H2 + N2 + Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4)



Second Coating: HfCN
H2 + N2 + Hafnium Tetrachloride (HfCl4) + Acetonitrile




(CH3CN)



Third Coating: TiN
H2 + N2 + Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4)


TiN—Al2O3—TiCN—TiN
First Coating: TiN
H2 + N2 + Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4)



Second Coating: Al2O3
H2+ HCl + Aluminum Chloride (AlCl3) + CO2 + H2S



Third Coating: TiCN
H2 + N2 + TiCl4 + Acetonitrile (CH3CN) or CH4



Fourth Coating: TiN
H2 + N2 + Titanium Tetrachloride (TiCl4)









A milling insert, ADKT150SPDER-47, with GX20™ as carbide substrate was used for the tool wear test. The workpiece materials and the cutting conditions are given in Table 3.









TABLE 3







Tool Wear Tests









Test
Work Materials
Cutting Conditions





Wear Test 1
Inconel 718
Cutting Speed = 25 meter per minute



475HB
Feed Rate = 0.08 mm per tooth




Depth of Cut = 5 mm


Wear Test 2
Stainless Steel
Cutting Speed = 92 meter per minute



316
Feed Rate = 0.10 mm per tooth



176HB
Depth of Cut = 5 mm


Wear Test 3
Titanium 6V
Cutting speed = 46 meter per minute



517HB
Feed Rate = 0.10 mm per tooth




Depth of Cut = 5 mm









The experimental results including analysis of the effects of wear at both cutting edge and nose radius are shown in FIGS. 1 to 3. The total machining time shown in the figures indicates when a cutting insert either exceeds the tool life or is destroyed during the machining process. The analysis is given below.


In FIG. 1, the results of machining a work piece of Inconel 718 are shown. The nominal composition of Inconel 718 is considered to be a difficult-to-machine work material. For the cutting insert with TiN—TiC—TiN coating, the wear at edge has reached 0.208 mm and the wear at radius reached 0.175 mm after only machining for 5.56 minutes. A cutting insert of the present invention with a multilayer TiN—HfCN—TiN coating demonstrates the best performance with only 0.168 mm wear at edge and 0.136 mm wear at radius after machining for 11.13 minutes. The cutting insert with TiN—Al2O3—TiCN—TiN coating demonstrated the performance close to that with TiN—HfCN—TiN coating.


In FIG. 2, the results of machining stainless steel 316 with several cutting inserts are shown. The cutting insert with TiN—TiC—TiN coating showed 0.132 mm wear at edge and 0.432 mm wear at radius only after machining for 2.62 minutes. The cutting insert with TiN—Al2O3—TiCN—TiN coating showed 0.069 mm wear at edge and 0.089 mm wear at radius after machining for 2.62 minutes. Again, the cutting insert with TiN—HfCN—TiN coating demonstrates the best performance with only 0.076 mm wear at edge and 0.117 mm wear at radius after machining for 5.24 minutes which is as twice as the time of other two cutting inserts.


In FIG. 3, the results for machining Ti-6V-4Al titanium alloy, which is also considered to be a difficult-to-machine work material, are shown. The cutting insert with TiN—TiC—TiN coating creates demonstrated 0.091 mm wear at edge and a 0.165 mm wear at radius only after machining for 4.36 minutes. The cutting insert with TiN—Al2O3—TiCN—TiN coating showed 0.137 mm wear at edge and 0.15 mm wear at radius after machining for 8.73 minutes. Once again, the cutting insert with TiN—HfCN—TiN coating demonstrated the best performances and service life with 0.076 mm wear at edge and 0.117 mm wear at radius after machining for 8.73 minutes.


Example 2
Results of Thermal Crack Test (GX20™ Substrate)

Three cutting inserts comprising a substrate of GX20™ were coated by CVD. The three coatings were a three-layer TiN—TiCN—Al2O3 coating, a single layer HfN (hafnium nitride) coating, and a single layer HfCN (hafnium carbon nitride) coating. The three coated GX20™ substrates were tested for resistance to thermal cracking.


The cutting conditions used in the thermal crack test are shown as follows.


















Cutting speed:
Vc = 175 m/min (Thermal Crack Test 1)




Vc = 220 m/min (Thermal Crack Test 2)



Feed rate
Fz = 0.25 mm/tooth



Depth of cut:
DOC = 2.5 mm



Work Material:
4140 steel with a hardness of 300 HB










The test results may be compared by the photomicrographs in FIGS. 4 and 5. The photomicrographs of FIG. 4 summarize Thermal Crack Test 1 and show that the cutting insert with a coating of HfN generated 5 thermal cracks in 3 passes of machining (see FIG. 4b) while the cutting insert coated with HfCN demonstrated the best performance and generated only 1 thermal crack in 3 passes (see FIG. 4c). As a general comparison, the cutting insert with three-layer TiN—TiCN—Al2O3 coating generated 4 thermal cracks in 3 passes of machining (see FIG. 4a).


The photomicrographs of FIG. 5 summarize the results of Thermal Crack Test 2. In Thermal Crack Test 2, the cutting speed was increased to 220 meter per minute. The edge of the cutting insert with single layer coating HfN was destroyed after only 1 pass of machining (see FIG. 4b). The cutting insert with three-layer coating TiN—TiCN—Al2O3 generated 12 thermal cracks in 2 passes of machining (see FIG. 4a). Once again, the cutting insert with single layer coating HfCN generated only 1 thermal crack in 2 passes of machining. In the comparison between Thermal Crack Test 1 and Thermal Crack Test 2, it becomes clear that at higher cutting speeds, there is a larger difference in performance between the cutting insert with single layer HfCN as compared with the cutting inserts with single layer coating HfN and three-layer coating TiN—TiCN—Al2O3.


The results from both wear test and thermal crack test directly indicate that it is the unique combination of hafnium-carbon-nitride based coating and ruthenium-featured carbide substrate that demonstrates the best performance in machining. The hafnium-carbon-nitride based coating may be the intermediate layer coating in a case of multilayer coating or just as a single layer coating.

Claims
  • 1. A cutting tool, comprising: a substrate comprising metal carbide particles and a binder, wherein the binder comprises ruthenium; andat least one wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride.
  • 2. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride has a thickness from 1 to 10 microns.
  • 3. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the binder further comprises at least one of iron, nickel and cobalt.
  • 4. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the binder further comprises cobalt.
  • 5. The cutting tool of claim 3 or 4, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 1% to 30%, by weight.
  • 6. The cutting tool of claim 5, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 4% to 30%, by weight.
  • 7. The cutting tool of claim 6, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 8% to 20%, by weight.
  • 8. The cutting tool of claim 7, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 10% to 15%, by weight.
  • 9. The cutting tool of claim 1, comprising at least one additional coating comprising at least one of a metal carbide, a metal nitride, a metal silicon or a metal oxide of a metal selected from groups IIIA, IVB, VB, and VIB of the periodic table, wherein the hafnium carbon nitride coating comprises at least one of a first coating on the substrate, an intermediate coating on the substrate, and a final coating on the substrate.
  • 10. The cutting tool of claim 9, wherein the at least one additional coating is selected from titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium carbide (TiC), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN), titanium aluminum nitride plus carbon (TiAlN+C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), titanium aluminum nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (TiAlN+WC/C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), aluminum titanium nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (AlTiN+WC/C), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), α-alumina oxide, titanium diboride (TiB2), tungsten carbide carbon (WC/C), chromium nitride (CrN), aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN), zirconium nitride (ZrN), zirconium carbon nitride (ZrCN), boron nitride (BN), and boron carbon nitride (BCN).
  • 11. The cutting tool of claim 10, wherein any of the at least one additional coating has a thickness from 2 to 6 micrometers.
  • 12. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the wear resistant coating comprising hafnium carbon nitride is one of an only coating, a first coating, an intermediate coating, and a top coating.
  • 13. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the metal carbide particles of the substrate comprise at least one transition metal selected from titanium, chromium, vanadium, zirconium, hafnium, tantalum, molybdenum, niobium, and tungsten.
  • 14. The cutting tool of claim 3 or 4, wherein the binder further comprises an alloying agent selected from tungsten, titanium, tantalum, niobium, chromium, molybdenum, boron, carbon, silicon, ruthenium, rhenium, manganese, aluminum, and copper.
  • 15. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the metal carbide particles of the substrate comprise tungsten carbide.
  • 16. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the wear resistant coating consists essentially of hafnium carbon nitride.
  • 17. The cutting tool of claim 16, wherein the substrate comprises 2 to 40 weight percent of the binder and 60 to 98 weight percent of the metal carbide particles, and wherein the metal carbide particles comprise tungsten carbide particles.
  • 18. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the metal carbide particles comprise tungsten carbide particles having an average grain size of 0.3 to 10 μm.
  • 19. The cutting tool of claim 1, wherein the metal carbide particles comprise tungsten carbide particles having an average grain size of 0.5 to 10 μm.
  • 20. A method of coating a cutting tool, comprising: applying a wear resistant coating of hafnium carbon nitride on a cutting tool, wherein the substrate comprises tungsten carbide particles in a binder and the binder comprises ruthenium.
  • 21. The method of claim 20, wherein the wear resistant coating has a thickness from 1 to 6 microns.
  • 22. The method of claim 20, wherein the binder comprises at least one of iron, nickel and cobalt.
  • 23. The method of claim 22, wherein the binder is cobalt.
  • 24. The method of claim 23, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 1% to 30%, by weight.
  • 25. The method of claim 24, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 4% to 30%, by weight.
  • 26. The method of claim 25, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder from 8% to 20%, by weight.
  • 27. The method of claim 26, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder from 10% to 15%, by weight.
  • 28. The method of claim 20, comprising treating the cutting tool prior to coating the substrate.
  • 29. The method of claim 28, wherein treating the cutting tool prior to coating comprises at least one of electropolishing, microblasting, wet blasting, grinding, brushing, jet abrading and compressed air blasting.
  • 30. The method of claim 20, wherein a coating is formed on at least a portion of the substrate.
  • 31. The method of claim 20, comprising treating the coating on the substrate by at least one of blasting, shot peening, compressed air blasting, and brushing.
  • 32. The method of claim 20, comprising applying additional coatings on the substrate by physical vapor deposition.
  • 33. The method of claim 20, comprising applying additional coatings on the substrate by chemical vapor deposition.
  • 34. The method of claim 20, comprising coating the cutting insert with at least one of a metal carbide, a metal nitride, a metal silicon and a metal oxide of a metal selected from groups IIIA, IVB, VB, and VIB of the periodic table.
  • 35. The method of claim 34, wherein the coating comprises at least one of titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN), titanium aluminum nitride plus carbon (TiAlN+C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), titanium aluminum nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (TiAlN+WC/C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), aluminum titanium nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (AlTiN+WC/C), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), titanium diboride (TiB2), tungsten carbide carbon (WC/C), chromium nitride (CrN), aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN), zirconium nitride (ZrN), zirconium carbon nitride (ZrCN), boron nitride (BN), or boron carbon nitride (BCN).
  • 36. The method of claim 34, wherein each coating has a thickness from 1 to 10 micrometers.
  • 37. A cutting tool, comprising: a substrate comprising metal carbide particles and a binder, wherein the binder comprises ruthenium; andat least one wear resistant coating on the substrate, wherein the at least one wear resistant coating consists essentially of zirconium carbon nitride (ZrCN), or boron carbon nitride (BCN).
  • 38. The cutting tool of claim 37, wherein the at least one wear resistant coating has a thickness from 1 to 10 microns.
  • 39. The cutting tool of claim 37, wherein the binder further comprises at least one of iron, nickel and cobalt.
  • 40. The cutting tool of claim 39, wherein the binder further comprises cobalt.
  • 41. The cutting tool of claim 37, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 1% to 30%, by weight.
  • 42. The cutting tool of claim 41, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 4% to 30%, by weight.
  • 43. The cutting tool of claim 42, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 8% to 20%, by weight.
  • 44. The cutting tool of claim 43, wherein the concentration of ruthenium in the binder is from 10% to 15%, by weight.
  • 45. The cutting tool of claim 37, comprising at least one additional coating, wherein the at least one additional coating comprises at least one of a metal carbide, a metal nitride, a metal silicon and a metal oxide of a metal selected from groups IIIA, IVB, VB, and VIB of the periodic table; wherein the wear resistant coating consisting essentially of one of zirconium carbon nitride (ZrCN) and boron carbon nitride (BCN) comprises one or more of a first coating on the substrate, an intermediate coating on the substrate, and a final coating on the substrate.
  • 46. The cutting tool of claim 45, wherein the at least one additional coating comprises at least one of titanium nitride (TiN), titanium carbide (TiC), titanium carbonitride (TiCN), titanium aluminum nitride (TiAlN), titanium aluminum nitride plus carbon (TiAlN+C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), titanium aluminum nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (TiAlN+WC/C), aluminum titanium nitride (AlTiN), aluminum titanium nitride plus carbon (AlTiN+C), aluminum titanium nitride plus tungsten carbide/carbon (AlTiN+WC/C), aluminum oxide (Al2O3), α-alumina oxide, titanium diboride (TiB2), tungsten carbide carbon (WC/C), chromium nitride (CrN), aluminum chromium nitride (AlCrN), and hafnium carbon nitride (HfCN).
US Referenced Citations (233)
Number Name Date Kind
2299207 Bevillard Oct 1969 A
3471921 Feenstra Oct 1969 A
3490901 Hachisuka et al. Jan 1970 A
3581835 Stebley Jun 1971 A
3628921 Hill Dec 1971 A
3660050 Iler et al. May 1972 A
3746456 Hill Jul 1973 A
3757879 Wilder et al. Sep 1973 A
3785783 Mynard et al. Jan 1974 A
3806270 Tanner et al. Apr 1974 A
3854991 Hale Dec 1974 A
3920407 Mynard et al. Nov 1975 A
RE28645 Aoki et al. Dec 1975 E
3942954 Frehn Mar 1976 A
3986653 Gilding Oct 1976 A
3989558 Mynard et al. Nov 1976 A
4009027 Naidich et al. Feb 1977 A
4017480 Baum Apr 1977 A
4097275 Horvath Jun 1978 A
4106382 Salje et al. Aug 1978 A
4126652 Oohara et al. Nov 1978 A
4170499 Thomas et al. Oct 1979 A
4268569 Hale May 1981 A
4270952 Kobayashi Jun 1981 A
4277106 Sahley Jul 1981 A
4308059 Rymas Dec 1981 A
4311490 Bovenkerk et al. Jan 1982 A
4325994 Kitashima et al. Apr 1982 A
4327156 Dillon et al. Apr 1982 A
4340327 Martins Jul 1982 A
4389952 Dreier et al. Jun 1983 A
4432794 Holleck Feb 1984 A
4478297 Radtke Oct 1984 A
4550532 Fletcher, Jr. et al. Nov 1985 A
4553615 Grainger Nov 1985 A
4574011 Bonjour et al. Mar 1986 A
4587174 Yoshimura et al. May 1986 A
4592685 Beere Jun 1986 A
4604106 Hall Aug 1986 A
4605343 Hibbs, Jr. et al. Aug 1986 A
4609577 Long Sep 1986 A
4610931 Nemeth et al. Sep 1986 A
4642003 Yoshimura Feb 1987 A
4649086 Johnson Mar 1987 A
4686156 Baldoni, II et al. Aug 1987 A
4722405 Langford Feb 1988 A
4729789 Ide et al. Mar 1988 A
4734339 Schachner et al. Mar 1988 A
4743515 Fischer et al. May 1988 A
4749053 Hollingshead Jun 1988 A
4861350 Phaal et al. Aug 1989 A
4923512 Timm et al. May 1990 A
4956012 Jacobs et al. Sep 1990 A
5041261 Buljan et al. Aug 1991 A
RE33753 Vacchiano et al. Nov 1991 E
5067860 Kobayashi et al. Nov 1991 A
5098232 Benson Mar 1992 A
5110687 Abe et al. May 1992 A
5135801 Nystrom et al. Aug 1992 A
5174700 Sgarbi et al. Dec 1992 A
5179772 Braun et al. Jan 1993 A
5186739 Isobe et al. Feb 1993 A
5203513 Keller et al. Apr 1993 A
5203932 Kato et al. Apr 1993 A
5250367 Santhanam et al. Oct 1993 A
5266415 Newkirk et al. Nov 1993 A
5273380 Musacchia Dec 1993 A
5281260 Kumar et al. Jan 1994 A
5305840 Liang et al. Apr 1994 A
5326196 Noll Jul 1994 A
5333520 Fischer et al. Aug 1994 A
5348806 Kojo et al. Sep 1994 A
5359772 Carlsson et al. Nov 1994 A
5376329 Morgan et al. Dec 1994 A
5423899 Krall et al. Jun 1995 A
5438858 Friedrichs Aug 1995 A
5441693 Ederyd et al. Aug 1995 A
5462013 Punola et al. Oct 1995 A
5467669 Stroud Nov 1995 A
5476531 Timm et al. Dec 1995 A
5482670 Hong Jan 1996 A
5484468 Östlund et al. Jan 1996 A
5505748 Tank et al. Apr 1996 A
5525134 Mehrotra et al. Jun 1996 A
5541006 Conley Jul 1996 A
5543235 Mirchandani et al. Aug 1996 A
5570978 Rees et al. Nov 1996 A
5580666 Dubensky et al. Dec 1996 A
5590729 Cooley et al. Jan 1997 A
5593474 Keshavan et al. Jan 1997 A
5603075 Stoll et al. Feb 1997 A
5609447 Britzke et al. Mar 1997 A
5612264 Nilsson et al. Mar 1997 A
5628837 Britzke et al. May 1997 A
RE35538 Akesson et al. Jun 1997 E
5635247 Ruppi Jun 1997 A
5658678 Stoll et al. Aug 1997 A
5665431 Narasimhan Sep 1997 A
5677042 Massa et al. Oct 1997 A
5679445 Massa et al. Oct 1997 A
5686119 McNaughton, Jr. Nov 1997 A
5697042 Massa et al. Dec 1997 A
5718948 Ederyd et al. Feb 1998 A
5733649 Kelley et al. Mar 1998 A
5733664 Kelley et al. Mar 1998 A
5750247 Bryant et al. May 1998 A
5755033 Gunter et al. May 1998 A
5762843 Massa et al. Jun 1998 A
5776593 Massa et al. Jul 1998 A
5778301 Hong Jul 1998 A
5789686 Massa et al. Aug 1998 A
5792403 Massa et al. Aug 1998 A
5802955 Stoll et al. Sep 1998 A
5806934 Massa et al. Sep 1998 A
5830256 Northrop et al. Nov 1998 A
5856626 Fischer et al. Jan 1999 A
5863640 Ljungberg et al. Jan 1999 A
5880382 Fang et al. Mar 1999 A
5935351 Sherman et al. Aug 1999 A
5948541 Inspektor Sep 1999 A
5967249 Butcher Oct 1999 A
5976707 Grab et al. Nov 1999 A
6007909 Rolander et al. Dec 1999 A
6022175 Heinrich et al. Feb 2000 A
6086003 Gunter et al. Jul 2000 A
6089123 Chow et al. Jul 2000 A
6209420 Butcher et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214247 Leverenz et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214287 Waldenström Apr 2001 B1
6217992 Grab Apr 2001 B1
6220117 Butcher Apr 2001 B1
6228139 Oskarsson May 2001 B1
6254658 Taniuchi et al. Jul 2001 B1
6287360 Kembaiyan et al. Sep 2001 B1
6290438 Papajewski Sep 2001 B1
6293986 Rödiger et al. Sep 2001 B1
6299658 Moriguchi et al. Oct 2001 B1
6350510 Konig et al. Feb 2002 B1
6352627 Leyendecker et al. Mar 2002 B2
6353771 Southland Mar 2002 B1
6372346 Toth Apr 2002 B1
6374932 Brady Apr 2002 B1
6395108 Eberle et al. May 2002 B2
6425716 Cook Jul 2002 B1
6447890 Leverenz et al. Sep 2002 B1
6450739 Puide et al. Sep 2002 B1
6502623 Schmitt Jan 2003 B1
6511265 Mirchandani et al. Jan 2003 B1
6514456 Lackner et al. Feb 2003 B1
6521172 Grearson et al. Feb 2003 B2
6544308 Griffin et al. Apr 2003 B2
6554548 Grab et al. Apr 2003 B1
6562462 Griffin et al. May 2003 B2
6585064 Griffin et al. Jul 2003 B2
6617058 Schier Sep 2003 B2
6620375 Tank et al. Sep 2003 B1
6638609 Nordgren et al. Oct 2003 B2
6655882 Heinrich et al. Dec 2003 B2
6660371 Westphal et al. Dec 2003 B1
6676863 Christiaens et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685880 Engström et al. Feb 2004 B2
6719074 Tsuda et al. Apr 2004 B2
6723389 Kobayashi et al. Apr 2004 B2
6737178 Ota et al. May 2004 B2
6764555 Hiramatsu et al. Jul 2004 B2
6827975 Leverenz et al. Dec 2004 B2
6830604 Grearson et al. Dec 2004 B2
6844085 Takayama et al. Jan 2005 B2
6848521 Lockstedt et al. Feb 2005 B2
6869334 Leyendecker et al. Mar 2005 B1
6884496 Westphal et al. Apr 2005 B2
6884497 Sulin et al. Apr 2005 B2
6892793 Liu et al. May 2005 B2
6911063 Liu Jun 2005 B2
6929851 Leverenz et al. Aug 2005 B1
6949148 Sugiyama et al. Sep 2005 B2
6955233 Crowe et al. Oct 2005 B2
6958099 Nakamura et al. Oct 2005 B2
7014719 Suzuki et al. Mar 2006 B2
7014720 Iseda Mar 2006 B2
7070666 Druschitz et al. Jul 2006 B2
7090731 Kashima et al. Aug 2006 B2
7101446 Takeda et al. Sep 2006 B2
7125207 Craig et al. Oct 2006 B2
7128773 Liang et al. Oct 2006 B2
7175404 Kondo et al. Feb 2007 B2
7207750 Annanolli et al. Apr 2007 B2
7238414 Benitsch et al. Jul 2007 B2
7244519 Festeau et al. Jul 2007 B2
7250069 Kembaiyan et al. Jul 2007 B2
7267543 Freidhoff et al. Sep 2007 B2
7381283 Lee et al. Jun 2008 B2
7384413 Gross et al. Jun 2008 B2
7384443 Mirchandani et al. Jun 2008 B2
7410610 Woodfield et al. Aug 2008 B2
7497396 Splinter et al. Mar 2009 B2
7513320 Mirchandani et al. Apr 2009 B2
7625157 Prichard et al. Dec 2009 B2
7687156 Fang Mar 2010 B2
7691496 Park et al. Apr 2010 B2
7846551 Fang et al. Dec 2010 B2
8007922 Mirchandani et al. Aug 2011 B2
8025112 Mirchandani et al. Sep 2011 B2
20030010409 Kunze et al. Jan 2003 A1
20030041922 Hirose et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030161695 Grab et al. Aug 2003 A1
20030219605 Molian et al. Nov 2003 A1
20040105730 Nakajima Jun 2004 A1
20040234820 Majagi Nov 2004 A1
20050103404 Hsieh et al. May 2005 A1
20050194073 Hamano et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050211475 Mirchandani et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050247491 Mirchandani et al. Nov 2005 A1
20060060392 Eyre Mar 2006 A1
20060286410 Ahigren et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070082229 Mirchandani et al. Apr 2007 A1
20070126334 Nakamura et al. Jun 2007 A1
20070163679 Fujisawa et al. Jul 2007 A1
20070193782 Fang et al. Aug 2007 A1
20080011519 Smith et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080101977 Eason et al. May 2008 A1
20080163723 Mirchandani et al. Jul 2008 A1
20080302576 Mirchandani et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090041612 Fang et al. Feb 2009 A1
20090136308 Newitt May 2009 A1
20090180915 Mirchandani et al. Jul 2009 A1
20090293672 Mirchandani et al. Dec 2009 A1
20100044114 Mirchandani et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100044115 Mirchandani et al. Feb 2010 A1
20100290849 Mirchandani et al. Nov 2010 A1
20100303566 Fang et al. Dec 2010 A1
20110011965 Mirchandani et al. Jan 2011 A1
20110052931 Morton et al. Mar 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (74)
Number Date Country
268706 Feb 1996 AT
695583 Feb 1998 AU
2212197 Oct 2000 CA
647813 Feb 1985 CH
2719532 Nov 1977 DE
0157625 Oct 1985 EP
0264674 Apr 1988 EP
0453428 Oct 1991 EP
0995876 Apr 2000 EP
1077783 Feb 2001 EP
1106706 Jun 2001 EP
0759480 Jan 2002 EP
1686193 Aug 2006 EP
1198609 Oct 2007 EP
622041 Apr 1949 GB
1082568 Sep 1967 GB
1309634 Mar 1970 GB
1393115 May 1975 GB
1393116 May 1975 GB
1420906 Jan 1976 GB
1491044 Nov 1977 GB
2158744 Nov 1985 GB
2352727 Feb 2001 GB
2393449 Mar 2004 GB
2435476 Aug 2007 GB
59-175912 Oct 1984 JP
61-243103 Oct 1986 JP
61-261453 Nov 1986 JP
61-261455 Nov 1986 JP
62-063005 Mar 1987 JP
02254144 Oct 1990 JP
2-269515 Nov 1990 JP
5-50314 Mar 1993 JP
H03-119090 Jun 1995 JP
H07-276105 Oct 1995 JP
8-120308 May 1996 JP
H8-209284 Aug 1996 JP
H09-011005 Jan 1997 JP
10219385 Aug 1998 JP
H11-010409 Jan 1999 JP
11-300516 Nov 1999 JP
2002-097885 Apr 2002 JP
2002-166326 Jun 2002 JP
2002-317596 Oct 2002 JP
2003-306739 Oct 2003 JP
2004-181604 Jul 2004 JP
2004-190034 Jul 2004 JP
2005-111581 Apr 2005 JP
2135328 Aug 1999 RU
2173241 Feb 2000 RU
2200209 Mar 2003 RU
1050810 Oct 1983 SU
1292917 Feb 1987 SU
1350322 Nov 1987 SU
WO 9205009 Apr 1992 WO
WO 9913121 Mar 1999 WO
WO 0052217 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0073532 Dec 2000 WO
WO 03010350 Feb 2003 WO
WO 2005045082 May 2005 WO
WO 2005054530 Jun 2005 WO
WO 2005061746 Jul 2005 WO
WO 2006023222 Mar 2006 WO
WO 2006071192 Jul 2006 WO
WO 2006104004 Oct 2006 WO
WO 2007001870 Jan 2007 WO
WO 2007022336 Feb 2007 WO
WO 2007030707 Mar 2007 WO
WO 2007044791 Apr 2007 WO
WO 2007127680 Nov 2007 WO
WO 2008098636 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008103605 Aug 2008 WO
WO 2008115703 Sep 2008 WO
WO 2011008439 Jan 2011 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (65)
Entry
US 4,966,627, 10/1990, Keshavan et al. (withdrawn)
Tracey et al “Development of Tungsten Carbide-Cobalt-Ruthenium Cutting Tools for Machining Steels” Proceedings Annual Microprogrammia Workshop vol. 14, 1981, p. 281-292.
Coyle, T.W. and A. Bahrami, “Structure and Adhesion of Ni and Ni-WC Plasma Spray Coatings,” Thermal Spray, Surface Engineering via Applied Research, Proceedings of the 1st International Thermal Spray Conference, May 8-11, 2000, Montreal, Quebec, Canada, 2000, pp. 251-254.
Deng, X. et al., “Mechanical Properties of a Hybrid Cemented Carbide Composite,” International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials, Elsevier Science Ltd., vol. 19, 2001, pp. 547-552.
Gurland, Joseph, “Application of Quantitative Microscopy to Cemented Carbides,” Practical Applications of Quantitative Matellography, ASTM Special Technical Publication 839, ASTM 1984, pp. 65-84.
Hayden, Matthew and Lyndon Scott Stephens, “Experimental Results for a Heat-Sink Mechanical Seal,” Tribology Transactions, 48, 2005, pp. 352-361.
Peterman, Walter, “Heat-Sink Compound Protects the Unprotected,” Welding Design and Fabrication, Sep. 2003, pp. 20-22.
Shi et al., “Composite Ductility—The Role of Reinforcement and Matrix”, TMS Meeting, Las Vegas, NV, Feb. 12-16, 1995, 10 pages.
Sriram, et al., “Effect of Cerium Addition on Microstructures of Carbon-Alloyed Iron Aluminides,” Bull. Mater. Sci., vol. 28, No. 6, Oct. 2005, pp. 547-554.
Underwood, Quantitative Stereology, pp. 23-108 (1970).
Vander Vort, “Introduction to Quantitative Metallography”, Tech Notes, vol. 1, Issue 5, published by Buehler, Ltd. 1997, 6 pages.
J. Gurland, Quantitative Microscopy, R.T. DeHoff and F.N. Rhines, eds., McGraw-Hill Book Company, New York, 1968, pp. 279-290.
You Tube, “The Story Behind Kennametal's Beyond Blast”, dated Sep. 14, 2010, http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8—A-bYVwmU8 (3 pages) accessed on Oct. 14, 2010.
Kennametal press release on Jun. 10, 2010, http://news.thomasnet.com/companystory/Kennametal-Launches-Beyond-BLAST-TM-at-IMTS-2010-Booth-W-1522-833445 (2 pages) accessed on Oct. 14, 2010.
Pages from Kennametal site, https://www.kennametal.com/en-US/promotions/Beyond—Blast.jhtml (7 pages) accessed on Oct. 14, 2010.
ASM Materials Engineering Dictionary, J.R. Davis, Ed., ASM International, Fifth printing, Jan. 2006, p. 98.
Childs et al., “Metal Machining”, 2000, Elsevier, p. 111.
Brookes, Kenneth J. A., “World Directory and Handbook of Hardmetals and Hard Materials”, International Carbide Data, U.K. 1996, Sixth Edition, p. 42.
Firth Sterling grade chart, Allegheny Technologies, attached to Declaration of Prakash Mirchandani, Ph.D., U.S. Appl. No. 11/737,993, filed Sep. 9, 2009.
Metals Handbook Desk Edition, definition of ‘wear’, 2nd Ed., J.R. Davis, Editor, ASM International 1998, p. 62.
McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and Technical Terms, 5th Edition, Sybil P. Parker, Editor in Chief, 1993, pp. 799, 800, 1933, and 2047.
ProKon Version 8.6, the Calculation Companion, Properties for W, Ti, Mo, Co, Ni and FE, Copyright 1997-1998, 6 pages.
TIBTECH Innovations, “Properties table of stainless steel, metals and other conductive materials”, printed from http://www.tibtech.com/conductivity.php on Aug. 19, 2011, 1 page.
“Material: Tungsten Carbide (WC), bulk”, MEMSnet, printed from http://www.memsnet.org/material/tungstencarbidewcbulk/ on Aug. 19, 2001, 1 page.
Williams, Wendell S., “The Thermal Conductivity of Metallic Ceramics”, JOM, Jun. 1998, pp. 62-66.
Brookes, Kenneth J. A., “World Directory and Handbook of Hardmetals and Hard Materials”, International Carbide Data, U.K. 1996, Sixth Edition, pp. D182-D184.
Thermal Conductivity of Metals, the Engineering ToolBox, printed from http://www.engineeringtoolbox.com/thermal-conductivity-metals-d—858.html on Oct. 27, 2011, 3 pages.
Shing et al., “The effect of ruthenium additions on hardness, toughness and grain size of WC-Co,” Int. J. of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, vol. 19, pp. 41-44, 2001.
Biernat, “Coating can greatly enhance carbide tool life and performance, but only if they stay in place,” Cutting Tool Engineering, 47(2), Mar. 1995.
Brooks, World Dictionary and Handbook of Hardmetals and Hard Materials, International Carbide Data, Sixth edition, 1996, p. D194.
Tonshoff et al., “Surface treatment of cutting tool substrates,” Int. J. Tools Manufacturing, 38(5-6), 1998, 469-476.
Bouzakis et al., “Improvement of PVD Coated Inserts Cutting Performance Through Appropriate Mechanical Treatments of Substrate and Coating Surface”, Surface and Coatings Technology, 2001, 146-174; pp. 443-490.
Destefani, “Cutting tools 101: Coatings,” Manufacturing Engineering, 129(4), 2002, 5 pages.
Santhanam, et al., “Comparison of the Steel-Milling Performance of Carbide Inserts with MTCVD and PVD TiCN Coatings”, Int. J. of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials, vol. 14, 1996, pp. 31-40.
Wolfe et al., “The Role of Hard Coating in Carbide Milling Tools”, J. Vacuum Science Technology, vol. 4, No. 6, Nov/Dec 1986, pp. 2747-2754.
Quinto, “Mechanical Property and Structure Relationships in Hard Coatings for Cutting Tools”, J. Vacuum Science Technology, vol. 6, No. 3, May/Jun. 1988, pp. 2149-2157.
U.S. Appl. No. 13/286,355, filed Nov. 1, 2011.
“Production Know-How,” Metalworking Production, Feb. 1985, p. 40.
“Ruthenium Boosts Carbide's Capability,” Metalworking Production, Jun. 1978, p. 13.
“Ruthenium-Containing Carbide Tips Extend the Life of Cutting Tools,” Inco Europe Limited, London, May 1978.
Bonjour, Christian, “Effects of Ruthenium Additions on the Propoerties and Machining Behaviour of WC-Co Hard Metals,” Uni. of App. Sciences of West. Switz., Euro PM2004.
Bonjour, C., “Nouveaux Developpements Dans Les Outils De Coupe en Carbure Fritte,” Wear, 62,(1980) pp. 83-122, the Netherlands.
Brookes, Ken, “Functional Design Puts the Bite into Hard and Refractory Metals,” metal-powder.net, Nov. 2003, pp. 20-25.
Brookes, Ken, “Higher Speed Metals—Alias Carbides,” MPR, Aug. 1982, pp. 411, 412, 414.
Brookes, Ken, “Phase Inhibition and Residual Stresses,” metal-powder.net, Mar. 2003, pp. 22-23.
Brookes, Ken, “Ruthenium Exploits its Precious Talent,” Metalworking Production, Jul. 1979, pp. 77, 78, 80.
Brookes, Ken, “Stellram Continues Hardmetal Development,” MPR, Nov. 1994, pp. 28-31.
Jackson, J.S., et al., “Cemented Carbides with High Melting-Point Precious-Metal Binder Phases,” Powder Metallurgy Limited, 1974, pp. 255-269.
Lisovskii, A.F., “Cemented Carbides Alloyed with Ruthenium, Osmium, and Rhenium,” Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics, vol. 39, Nos. 9-10, 2000, pp. 428-433.
Lisovsky, A.F., “Some Problems on Technical Use of the Phenomenon of Metal Melts Imbibition of Sintered Composites,” Powder Metallurgy Intl, vol. 21, No. 6, 1989, pp. 7-9.
Lisovsky, A.F. et al., “On the Use of the Mmi-Phenomenon for the Formation of Nanostructures in WC-Co Cemented Carbides,” Int. J. Of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 15(1997) 227-235, Great Britain.
Luyckx, S., “High Temperature Hardness of WC-Co-Ru,” Journal of Materials Science Letters 21, 2002, 1681-1682.
Panteleev, I.B., “Oxidation Resistance and High-Temperature Strength of Wc-Co-Ni-Re (Mn) Hard Alloys,” Powder Metallurgy and Metal Ceramics, vol. 45, Nos. 7-8, 2006, 342-345.
Penrice, T.W., “Alternative Binders for Hard Metals,” Carbide and Tool Journal, Jul./Aug., pp. 12-15.
Penrice, T.W., “Some Characteristics of the Binder Phase in Cemented Carbides,” Int. J. Of Refractory Metals & Hard Materials 15(1997) 113-121.
“Ruthenium and Refractory Carbides—Titanium Carbide Composites of Remarkable Stability,” Platinum Metals Rev., 1974, 18(1), 27-28.
“Ruthenium as a Binder for Cemented Carbides,” Platinum Metals Rev., 1974, 18, (4), p. 129.
“Stellram to Produce Ruthenium-Containing Hardmetal,” p. 435.
Warren, R., et al., “The Microstructure sn Properties of Sintereed TiC-Ruthenium Alloys,” Powder Metallurgy International, vol. 7, No. 1, 1975, pp. 18-21.
Grade X500 description, printed from www.stellram.com via http://www.archive.org/web/web.php dated Aug. 19, 2007 on Feb. 10, 2012, 1 page.
Pastor, H., “Present Status and Development of Tool Materials: Part 1 Cutting Tools”, International Journal of Refractory Metals and Hard Materials (R&HM), Dec. 1987, pp. 196-209.
Shing et al., “The effect of ruthenium additions on hardness, toughness and grain size of WC-Co,” Euro PM99, Properties, pp. 245-252.
Schmid et al., “The Mechanical Behaviour of Cemented Carbides at High Temperatures”, Materials Science and Engineering, A105/106, 1988, pp. 343-351.
Brookes, World Dictionary and Handbook of Hardmetals and Hard Materials, International Carbide Data, Sixth edition, 1996, p. D194.
Bouzakis et al., “Increasing of cutting performance of PVD coated cemented carbide inserts in chipboard miling through improvement of the file adhesion, considering the coating cutting loads”, Surface and Coating Technology (2000), 133-134, 548-554.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20080196318 A1 Aug 2008 US