The invention relates generally to materials, and more particularly, to carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steels, producing method and applications of the same.
The background description provided herein is for the purpose of generally presenting the context of the invention. The subject matter discussed in the background of the invention section should not be assumed to be prior art merely as a result of its mention in the background of the invention section. Similarly, a problem mentioned in the background of the invention section or associated with the subject matter of the background of the invention section should not be assumed to have been previously recognized in the prior art. The subject matter in the background of the invention section merely represents different approaches, which in and of themselves may also be inventions. Work of the presently named inventors, to the extent it is described in the background of the invention section, as well as aspects of the description that may not otherwise qualify as prior art at the time of filing, are neither expressly nor impliedly admitted as prior art against the invention.
Automotive manufacturing is one of the major global industries which drives innovation and research in the field of structural materials. Automotive is primarily constituted by iron based alloys, copper, zinc, aluminum, magnesium, titanium alloys and engineered polymer composites. Ferrous metals and alloys are the most utilized ones among those materials, representing 67% by weight. There has been strong motivations and continuous improvements on fuel efficiency and driver safety of the automobiles, which have been enabled by improved structural materials as well as improved structure and design. These improvements ensure product reliability and increase affordability, resulting in the development of a wide range of material solutions for automotive applications. Some of the solutions incorporated developing newer lightweight materials with sufficient strength, utilization of downgauging, product design optimization etc. Steels are one of the most used materials in the car body and the type of steel used depends on the specific part of the car body. High strength with minimal deformation during crash is required for maximizing passenger safety while excellent stretch formability or ductility is required for deep drawing of the parts. A combination of both is required for components that are needed for energy absorption, durability and load bearing strength of the car.
Therefore, a heretofore unaddressed need exists in the art to address the aforementioned deficiencies and inadequacies.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel. In one embodiment, the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel includes a composition designed and processed such that the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel meets property objectives comprising a yield strength in a range of about 1000-2000 MPa, a uniform ductility, a desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, a desired level of weldability and an austenite stability designed to have an austenite start temperature Msσ to be equal to an application temperature in range from about 50° C. to −50° C. The property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel.
In one embodiment, the application temperature is about 5° C., or about −20° C.
In one embodiment, the composition is processed with a cooling and partitioning treatment.
In one embodiment, the composition comprises carbon (C) no more than 0.4 wt %, silicon (Si) no less than 1.0 wt %, and iron (Fe) in balance.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and molybdenum (Mo) in a range of about 0.4-0.8 wt. %.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and chromium (Cr) in a range of about 0.1-0.9 wt. %.
In one embodiment, the property objectives further comprises a carbon concentration in austenite, Cγ, in a range of about 1.0-1.8 wt %.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for producing a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel. In one embodiment, the method includes providing an iron (Fe) alloy containing a composition designed according to property objectives of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, wherein the property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel; and heat-treating the alloy to a temperature above Ac3, where Ac3 is a temperature at which a transformation from ferrite into austenite is finished; succeeding quenching the heat-treated alloy to a bainite region at a temperature between Ms and Bs, wherein Ms is a temperature at which a martensitic transformation starts in the alloy, and Bs is a temperature at which a coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts the alloy; and optimally cooling the quenched alloy to form to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein a cooling ratio of the optimally cooling step is precisely controlled so that the temperature of the alloy continues to be slightly above the Ms temperature which keeps decreasing during the optimally cooling step.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with an austenization or hot rolling treatment.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with a hot rolling treatment and subsequently a cold rolling treatment and a solution treatment.
In one embodiment, the optimally cooling step is performed with gradually cooling or step-wise cooling.
In one embodiment, the property objectives comprises a yield strength in a range of about 1000-2000 MPa, a uniform ductility, a desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, a desired level of weldability and an austenite stability designed to have an austenite start temperature Msσ to be equal to an application temperature in range from about 50° C. to −50° C.
In one embodiment, the composition comprises carbon (C) no more than 0.4 wt %, silicon (Si) no less than 1.0 wt %, and iron (Fe) in balance.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and molybdenum (Mo) in a range of about 0.4-0.8 wt. %.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and chromium (Cr) in a range of about 0.1-0.9 wt. %.
In yet another aspect, the invention relates to a method for designing a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel. In one embodiment, the method includes defining property objectives of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, wherein the property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel; designing a composition of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel according to the property objectives; and processing the composition to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein the processing step is performed with a cooling and partitioning process.
In one embodiment, the processing step comprises solidifying the composition to form an alloy; and reheating the alloy.
In one embodiment, the cooling and partitioning process comprises heat-treating the alloy to a temperature above Ac3, where Ac3 is a temperature at which a transformation from ferrite into austenite is finished; succeeding quenching the heat-treated alloy to a bainite region at a temperature between Ms and Bs, wherein Ms is a temperature at which a martensitic transformation starts in the alloy, and Bs is a temperature at which a coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts the alloy; and optimally cooling the quenched alloy to form to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein a cooling ratio of the optimally cooling step is precisely controlled so that the temperature of the alloy continues to be slightly above the Ms temperature which keeps decreasing during the optimally cooling step.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with an austenization or hot rolling treatment.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with a hot rolling treatment and subsequently a cold rolling treatment and a solution treatment.
In one embodiment, the optimally cooling step is performed with gradually cooling or step-wise cooling.
In one embodiment, the property objectives comprises a yield strength in a range of about 1000-2000 MPa, a uniform ductility, a desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, a desired level of weldability and an austenite stability designed to have an austenite start temperature Msσ to be equal to an application temperature in range from about 50° C. to −50° C.
In one embodiment, the composition comprises carbon (C) no more than 0.4 wt %, silicon (Si) no less than 1.0 wt %, and iron (Fe) in balance.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to a method for designing a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, In one embodiment, the method includes determining a composition, and producing a trial alloy from the trial composition, wherein the trial alloy has substantially high hardenability to avoid formation of ferrite, and contains carbon no more than 0.4 wt % for weldability and silicon no less than 1.0 wt % for carbide prohibition; performing a cooling and partitioning treatment to the trial alloy, and experimentally evaluating the trial alloy at an initial state, a transitional path, and an end state of the cooling and partitioning treatment to obtain trial parameters comprising at least a quenching temperature, a descent of a Ms temperature, and a final partitioning temperature; refining the composition by computational material engineering models using the trial parameters, such that an alloy formed of the refined composition meets property objectives of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, wherein the property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel.
In one embodiment, at the initial state, Ms temperature, Bs temperature used to identify a quenching temperature, and a bainite start time at different temperatures are measured; at the transitional path, the Ms temperature is measured at different process times so as to determine a descent of the Ms temperature; and at the end state, a final partitioning temperature, mechanical performance, austenite stability, and microstructures are measured.
In one embodiment, the cooling and partitioning treatment comprises heat-treating the alloy to a temperature above Ac3, where Ac3 is a temperature at which a transformation from ferrite into austenite is finished; succeeding quenching the heat-treated alloy to a bainite region at a temperature between Ms and Bs, wherein Ms is a temperature at which a martensitic transformation starts in the alloy, and Bs is a temperature at which a coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts the alloy; and optimally cooling the quenched alloy to form to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein a cooling ratio of the optimally cooling step is precisely controlled so that the temperature of the alloy continues to be slightly above the Ms temperature which keeps decreasing during the optimally cooling step.
In one embodiment, the optimally cooling step is performed with gradually cooling or step-wise cooling.
In one embodiment, the property objectives comprises a yield strength in a range of about 1000-2000 MPa, a uniform ductility, a desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, a desired level of weldability and an austenite stability designed to have an austenite start temperature Msσ to be equal to an application temperature in range from about 50° C. to −50° C.
These and other aspects of the invention will become apparent from the following description of the preferred embodiment taken in conjunction with the following drawings, although variations and modifications therein may be affected without departing from the spirit and scope of the novel concepts of the invention.
The following drawings form part of the present specification and are included to further demonstrate certain aspects of the invention. The invention may be better understood by reference to one or more of these drawings in combination with the detailed description of specific embodiments presented herein. The drawings described below are for illustration purposes only. The drawings are not intended to limit the scope of the present teachings in any way.
The present invention will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which exemplary embodiments of the present invention are shown. The present invention may, however, be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein. Rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will be thorough and complete, and will fully convey the scope of the invention to those skilled in the art Like reference numerals refer to like elements throughout.
The terms used in this specification generally have their ordinary meanings in the art, within the context of the invention, and in the specific context where each term is used. Certain terms that are used to describe the invention are discussed below, or elsewhere in the specification, to provide additional guidance to the practitioner regarding the description of the invention. For convenience, certain terms may be highlighted, for example using italics and/or quotation marks. The use of highlighting and/or capital letters has no influence on the scope and meaning of a term; the scope and meaning of a term are the same, in the same context, whether or not it is highlighted and/or in capital letters. It will be appreciated that the same thing can be said in more than one way. Consequently, alternative language and synonyms may be used for any one or more of the terms discussed herein, nor is any special significance to be placed upon whether or not a term is elaborated or discussed herein. Synonyms for certain terms are provided. A recital of one or more synonyms does not exclude the use of other synonyms. The use of examples anywhere in this specification, including examples of any terms discussed herein, is illustrative only and in no way limits the scope and meaning of the invention or of any exemplified term. Likewise, the invention is not limited to various embodiments given in this specification.
It will be understood that, although the terms first, second, third, etc. may be used herein to describe various elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections, these elements, components, regions, layers and/or sections should not be limited by these terms. These terms are only used to distinguish one element, component, region, layer or section from another element, component, region, layer or section. Thus, a first element, component, region, layer or section discussed below can be termed a second element, component, region, layer or section without departing from the teachings of the present invention.
It will be understood that, as used in the description herein and throughout the claims that follow, the meaning of “a”, “an”, and “the” includes plural reference unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Also, it will be understood that when an element is referred to as being “on,” “attached” to, “connected” to, “coupled” with, “contacting,” etc., another element, it can be directly on, attached to, connected to, coupled with or contacting the other element or intervening elements may also be present. In contrast, when an element is referred to as being, for example, “directly on,” “directly attached” to, “directly connected” to, “directly coupled” with or “directly contacting” another element, there are no intervening elements present. It will also be appreciated by those of skill in the art that references to a structure or feature that is disposed “adjacent” to another feature may have portions that overlap or underlie the adjacent feature.
It will be further understood that the terms “comprises” and/or “comprising,” or “includes” and/or “including” or “has” and/or “having” when used in this specification specify the presence of stated features, regions, integers, steps, operations, elements, and/or components, but do not preclude the presence or addition of one or more other features, regions, integers, steps, operations, elements, components, and/or groups thereof.
Furthermore, relative terms, such as “lower” or “bottom” and “upper” or “top,” may be used herein to describe one element's relationship to another element as illustrated in the figures. It will be understood that relative terms are intended to encompass different orientations of the device in addition to the orientation shown in the figures. For example, if the device in one of the figures is turned over, elements described as being on the “lower” side of other elements would then be oriented on the “upper” sides of the other elements. The exemplary term “lower” can, therefore, encompass both an orientation of lower and upper, depending on the particular orientation of the figure. Similarly, if the device in one of the figures is turned over, elements described as “below” or “beneath” other elements would then be oriented “above” the other elements. The exemplary terms “below” or “beneath” can, therefore, encompass both an orientation of above and below.
Unless otherwise defined, all terms (including technical and scientific terms) used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art to which the present invention belongs. It will be further understood that terms, such as those defined in commonly used dictionaries, should be interpreted as having a meaning that is consistent with their meaning in the context of the relevant art and the present disclosure, and will not be interpreted in an idealized or overly formal sense unless expressly so defined herein.
As used in this disclosure, “around”, “about”, “approximately” or “substantially” shall generally mean within 20 percent, preferably within 10 percent, and more preferably within 5 percent of a given value or range. Numerical quantities given herein are approximate, meaning that the term “around”, “about”, “approximately” or “substantially” can be inferred if not expressly stated.
As used in this disclosure, the phrase “at least one of A, B, and C” should be construed to mean a logical (A or B or C), using a non-exclusive logical OR. As used herein, the term “and/or” includes any and all combinations of one or more of the associated listed items.
As used in this disclosure, the term “advanced high strength steels”, or its acronym “AHSS”, refers to a new category of steels that has remarkable mechanical properties including very high tensile strength along with a considerable amount of ductility. The development of AHSS can be categorized into three generations. The first generation of AHSS is low alloyed steels with good combination of tensile strength and total elongation. These steels include the widely used dual phase (DP) steels, high strength low alloy (HSLA) steels, transformation induced plasticity (TRIP) steels and others. The second generation of austenitic AHSS demonstrates remarkably high strength values along with significant high elongation standards. These steels include the fully austenitic TRIP steels as well as the twinning induced plasticity (TWIP) steels which has a considerable amount of alloying additions (12%-30% Mn) that makes the steel too expensive for practical applications along with issues of mass production and weldability. The third generation comprises the carbide free bainitic (CFB) steels, medium manganese steels (5-10 wt %) and the quenched and partitioned (Q&P) steels. These steels are more feasible for industrial applications and have been commercialized in some cases by industrial manufacturers.
Thermomechanical processing of AHSS grades is crucial in generating the requisite microstructure that results in the desired mechanical properties. Most of the processing cycles start with a starting austenitization (full or partial) step and then cooling to different temperature regimes. The wide number of microstructural phases in iron-based alloys makes it possible for an array of resulting microstructures depending on the cooling rate. Subsequent heat treatment after the cooling step could vary from isothermal annealing at a fixed temperature to interrupted quenching and isothermal annealing at higher temperature depending on the desired microstructure. The microstructure after thermomechanical processing can constitute a mixture of the following phases: ferrite, bainite, retained austenite, martensite, carbides. The final steel properties are dependent on the composition, phase fraction and distribution of these phases in the microstructure.
AHSS are specifically developed to use as structural members in automotive applications. Some of the key attributes of AHSS in this regard include high strength, enhanced ductility, formability and weldability. Formability is defined as the ability of a material to be formed into simple and complex shapes by deformation processes. It is measured by using a variety of tests such as uniaxial tension tests, hemispherical punch forming, deep drawing and hole expansion tests. Welding is essential when constructing any structure. There has been strong demand from automotive industry for the materials which satisfy all these features at the same time.
As used in this disclosure, the term “quenched and partitioned steels”, or its acronym “Q&P steels”, refers to steels produced by a heat treatment with a quenching and partitioning (Q&P) process, which is a multi-step heat treatment that results in a composite microstructure of martensite, bainite, austenite and in some cases ferrite. These steels present good mechanical properties in term of strength, ductility and fracture toughness, all of which are essential properties for automotive applications. The Q&P process is schematically presented in
As used in this disclosure, the term “carbide-free bainitic steels”, or its acronym “CFB steels”, refers to refers to steels produced by a heat treatment with a carbide-free bainitic (CFB) process, whose microstructure includes only bainite and retained austenite. The CFB process is schematically presented in
As used in this disclosure, the term “transformation induced plasticity”, or its acronym “TRIP” refers to a deformation mechanism in which austenite transforms to hard martensite during mechanical deformation, which is one of the most exciting phenomena in steel metallurgy that enables unique strength ductility combinations in high strength steels. The transformation provides additional ductility by stabilizing plastic deformation and delaying tensile necking. The excellent combination of strength and ductility make these steels suitable for wide ranging applications. The class of steels with improved properties due to austenite to martensitic transformation during deformation are commonly deemed TRIP steels.
Transformation plasticity with regards to martensitic transformations arises due to biasing of accommodation slip triggered by transformation shape strain, and martensitic transformation net shape strain due to stress biasing of martensite orientation variants. The martensitic transformation during deformation results in controlled strain hardening which is crucial to inhibit flow instability and delay the onset of necking. Studies on the TRIP effect showed the improvement in mechanical properties due to reverse curvature of the σ−ϵ curve that postpones plastic localization such as tensile necking and shear fracture. The interplay of transformation kinetics and plastic flow behavior in TRIP steels has been studied in depth by Olson and Azrin by measuring the stress strain behavior during uniform as well as localized deformation.
It is shown that austenite to martensite transformation can occur spontaneously at pre-existing defects below a temperature defined as martensite start (Ms) temperature. The free energy difference between austenite and martensite at Ms equals to the critical free energy required for the transformation. At a temperature above Ms and below Md, where Md is a temperature above which no transformation occurs on deformation to fracture, transformation can occur aided by a mechanical driving force in addition to the chemical driving force. Above Md temperature the total driving force (chemical+mechanical) is unable to surpass the critical driving force making transformation no longer possible. At temperatures in between Ms and Md, the deformation induced transformation behavior is divided into two different transformation modes: (1) stress assisted mode at low temperatures with yielding by transformation; and (2) strain induced mode at higher temperatures with yielding by slip.
As used in this disclosure, the term “coupled diffusional/displacive phase transformations” refers to a solid-solid phase transformation in materials that results in non-equilibrium growth of a product phase with or without any associated composition change. Martensitic transformation is an example of non-equilibrium growth of a phase without any composition change. On the other hand, restricted equilibrium conditions such as para-equilibrium result in interstitial diffusion that results in equilibration of their chemical potential while substitutional additions are frozen in place. A more general case of non-equilibrium growth with compositional change would be the case where there is partial supersaturation of interstitials in the product phase and growth is mediated by the process of structural change across the interface. Olson, Bhadeshia and Cohen modeled the non-equilibrium growth of ferrite plates from austenite in Fe—C alloys where the structural transformation is displacive and derived how partitioning of solute would modify the nucleation and growth behavior during bainite transformation as a coupled process. The partitioning of carbon increases the available free energy for transformation thus allowing for assisted displacive transformation above the Ms temperature. This defined the so called “coupled diffusional/displacive transformation”.
As used in this disclosure, the term “Ba temperature” refers to a temperature at which coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts in a given alloy. Similar to Ms, the Bs reflects the amount of thermodynamic driving force required to initiate the shear transformation, but different from Ms, it is associated with interstitial carbon diffusion. That is, at Bs temperature, the driving force which is defined as the excess in chemical free energy per mole of austenite over that of bainite of the same composition is to be identical to the critical driving force. Furthermore, the maximum value of the driving force accompanied with carbon diffusion from bainitic ferrite into the retained austenite surrounding it can be decided by using the parallel tangent construction. In this sense, Bs temperature can be deduced by solving the temperature where the maximum driving force equals to critical driving force. At Bs temperature, full-partitioning of carbon is assumed under para-equilibrium constraints.
As used in this disclosure, the term “Ms temperature” refers to a temperature at which martensitic transformation starts in a steel during cooling when the austenite reaches the martensite start temperature (Ms) and the parent austenite becomes mechanically unstable. As the steel is quenched, an increasingly large percentage of the austenite transforms to martensite until the lower transformation temperature Mf (martensite finish temperature) is reached, at which time the transformation is completed. Martensite is formed in carbon steels by the rapid cooling (quenching) of the austenite form of iron at such a high rate that carbon atoms do not have time to diffuse out of the crystal structure in large enough quantities to form cementite (Fe3C). Austenite is γ-Fe, (gamma-phase iron), a solid solution of iron and alloying elements. As a result of the quenching, the face-centered cubic austenite transforms to a highly strained body-centered tetragonal form called martensite that is supersaturated with carbon. The shear deformations that result produce a large number of dislocations, which is a primary strengthening mechanism of steels. In certain alloy steels, martensite can also be formed by the working and hence deformation of the steel at temperature, while it is in its austenitic form, by quenching to below Ms and then working by plastic deformations to reductions of cross section area between 20% to 40% of the original. The great number of dislocations, combined with precipitates that originate and pin the dislocations in place, produces a very hard steel. This property is frequently used in toughened ceramics and in special steels like TRIP steels. Thus, martensite can be thermally induced or stress induced.
As used in this disclosure, the term “Msσ Temperature” is an austenite start temperature referring to a temperature at which the material can withstand the maximum stress before yielding due to martensitic transformation or slip deformation. It is also the temperature at which the deformation induced transformation mode changes from stress assisted to strain induced. Msσ temperature has been established as a quantitative measure of the retained austenite stability. It is especially useful as it can be theoretically calculated using thermodynamic models and experimentally measured with tensile test experiments. According to the Olson-Cohen model, when the temperature is at Msσ temperature and stress applied is at the yield stress for slip, the sum of chemical driving force and mechanical driving force for transformation equals the critical driving force required for martensitic transformation. Using established descriptions and those developed in the invention for the free energy terms as a function of temperature and composition, the Msσ temperature for any austenite composition and size can be calculated.
ΔGchem+ΔGmech=ΔGcrit at T=Msσ and σ=YSslip
The chemical driving force (ΔGchem) for transformation is calculated using the ThermoCalc software with a proprietary database (developed from the kMART database) suited specifically for low-temperature martensite transformation calculations. Gchem is defined as a function of the chemical composition and temperature i.e., ΔGchem=F(Xi, T), where i=C, Mn, Si and other alloying elements. The chemical driving force for martensitic transformation is the difference between the free energy of the body-centered cubic (BCC) and face-centered cubic (FCC) phases.
ΔGChem=GBCC−GFCC
The mechanical driving force (ΔGMech) considers the effect of applied stress on the orientation distribution of the existing nucleation sites. It is stress state dependent due to the interaction of applied stress with the transformation volume change. The relation of ΔGMech to the applied stress is given by the equation below. The parameter
in the equation is a function of the stress state.
where σH,
for uniaxial tension; σ=von Misses equivalent stress, fractional volume change upon transformation
The critical driving force is accounted as the sum of the nucleation defect potency (Gn) and the frictional work of interfacial motion due to solid solution hardening (WFSS) and forest dislocations (WFD) as defined by Behera. The nucleation defect potency has contributions from the transformation elastic strain energy (Get) and interfacial energy due to newly formed interfaces described by the
term, where γ is the specific fault/matrix interfacial energy, n is the defect potency (size) and d is the close-packed interplanar spacing. The solid solution frictional work of interfacial motion during martensite nucleation (WFSS) described by the equation below is a function of the chemical composition of retained austenite and has an a thermal and thermal component as quantified in the work of Ghosh and Olson. The frictional work due to the forest dislocations (WFD) is derived as a function of partitioning temperature by calibrating the model with experimentally measured values of the Msσ temperature.
ΔGCrit=−Gn−WFD−WFSS
where ΔGCrit is a critical driving force for martensitic transformation,
and WFSS=WFSS (athermal)+WFSS (thermal). In the stress assisted regime, yield stress at different testing temperatures can be calculated upon equating the sum of chemical and mechanical driving force to the critical driving force for martensitic transformation. The final form of transformation yield stress in the stress-assisted regime is described below. The slip yield stress variation with temperature in the strain-induced regime is measured experimentally via multiple specimen tensile test experiments. The intersection of the yield stress plots in the two regimes gives the Msσ temperature.
Embodiments of the invention are illustrated in detail hereinafter with reference to accompanying drawings. The description below is merely illustrative in nature and is in no way intended to limit the invention, its application, or uses. The broad teachings of the invention can be implemented in a variety of forms. Therefore, while this invention includes particular examples, the true scope of the invention should not be so limited since other modifications will become apparent upon a study of the drawings, the specification, and the following claims. For purposes of clarity, the same reference numbers will be used in the drawings to identify similar elements. It should be understood that one or more steps within a method may be executed in different order (or concurrently) without altering the principles of the invention.
At the core of the development of modern automotive steels with improved properties is the effort focused on AHSS. The automotive industries exhibit strong desire for improved strength with sufficient amount of ductility, hole-expansion ratio and cost effectiveness and with sufficient or improved level of weldability. CFB steels have proved a superior strength level among the third generation AHSS with sufficient ductility, whereas their production cost and weldability are not applicable to automotive constructions. They require very long heat-treatment at very low temperatures, which significantly lowers productivity thus total cost for materials production. They also contain a high amount of carbon to enable bainite formation at low temperatures, which severely damages the weldability. Another promising type of the third generation AHSS, Q&P TRIP steels, also have proven successful combinations of strength, ductility and cost. They exhibit a middle level of (strength*total elongation level) among the third generation AHSS. They can also be produced with relatively low extra materials production cost, since it can be produced with a minor facility investment in the conventional production line, without significant reduction of productivity. However, because of the inevitably forming carbides within martensite region, their mechanical performance (strength*total elongation) are limited compared to CFB steels. Also, their multi-phase microstructure with significant strength difference between ferrite and martensite lowers the hole-expansion ratio, as the interface between these two phases is prone to crack and expand. However, both CFB and Q&P steels have their unique limitations on either of the required performance or constraints from the automotive industry.
A significant number of research efforts have been undertaken to get the best performance out of the third generation AHSS, especially Q&P and CFB steels. Most efforts rely on an empirical design of experiments approach to quantify the effect of individual factors including overall composition and processing parameters. Although useful correlations have been obtained from these efforts, it is difficult to separate out effect of one parameter as there are many parameters that are highly interdependent.
One of the objectives of this invention is to provide, evaluate and enable a new concept, i.e., the C&P process/treatment, in the third generation AHSS steel designs, in order to breakthrough limitations of existing materials, thereby contributing to improvements of transportation systems.
Fully-bainitic microstructure with bainitic ferrite and retained austenite is suitable for this objective, in terms of both total elongation and hole-expansion ratio. This microstruture can trigger the TRIP effect due to the presence of the retained austenite at the application temperature. It can also avoid formation of carbides, which are typically formed in Q&P TRIP steels and reduce the amount of the retained austenite thus the TRIP effect, because the bainitic ferrite contains a lower density of nucleation sites for carbides compared with the martensite region in Q&P TRIP steels. In addition, it benefits the hole-expansion ratio as well, since it contains less strength difference in the existing phases. In CFB steels, the phases are only ferrite and retained austenite, whereas Q&P steel contains martensite in addition to them. Conventional design and production method for CFB steels cannot be simply applied to achieve desired CFB mictroctructure, since it contains too much carbon as an alloying element and requires too long heat-treatment.
In order to overcome these disadvantages of CFB steels, this invention discloses a new process, i.e., cooling and partitioning (C&P), for the third generation AHSS steels. In one embodiment shown in
Specifically, one design approach according to the invention is to develop ICME (integrated computational materials engineering) based mechanistic models grounded in quantitative phase transformation and transformation plasticity theory to predict the key microstructural characteristics that control the desired properties. In certain embodiments, the C&P process is utilized as an example process for this scientific and mechanistic approach. The developed thermodynamic and kinetic models fully incorporate the effect of alloy composition and processing parameters. The models calibrated with characterization measurements can then be used to computationally design an alloy composition and process cycle to achieve the best mechanical properties. According to embodiments of the invention, accurate experimental data for carbon partitioning using high resolution characterization techniques such as 3DAP and HEXRD are provided; thermodynamics-based predictive models are calibrated for austenite carbon enrichment as a function of alloy composition and processing parameters; the variation of austenite stability is evaluated with the C&P processing parameters, and thermodynamic models is calibrated to predict austenite stability for any given alloy composition and C&P cycle; the calibrated models for austenite carbon content and its stability after the C&P processing are validated; and the variation in competing carbide precipitation with processing conditions is quantified, and possible thermodynamic parameters that could be used to predict its precipitation behavior are determined.
Furthermore, according to embodiments of the invention, the effectiveness of the C&P method is evaluated by experimentally validating the mechanical performance such as strength, total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, with sufficient level of weldability and productivity. Further discussion with automotive industry is required to quantify the target value for each performance factors. By utilizing the above model, the optimal materials design and production conditions in the C&P method are evaluated. It is desirable for the model to be able to predict not only the mean value but also the minimum value of each performance, taking into account the fluctuations of the process conditions. In turn, the model can also be utilized to identify the possible fluctuations in the production conditions, temperature or cooling rate variations, for example, to insure required minimum performance. Material design is then calibrated to the actual possible mass-production conditions. As disclosed above, the C&P heat-treatment can be applied after either hot-rolling or cold-rolling in steel sheet production. In the case of after hot-rolling, the C&P treatment should initiate in the water cooling process, which comes right after hot-rolling in hot-rolling factories. It can be either totally finished in the water cooling process, or continued in the air-cooling process, which happens after coiling process where water-cooled sheet steels are rolled into shape of coils. Or, in the case of the C&P treatment performed after cold-rolling, it should be finished in the furnace-controlled heat-treatment process after cold-rolling.
The traditional process of new alloy or process development involves the commonly used trial and error methods that have the obvious drawbacks of being expensive and overly time consuming. In contrast, as disclosed in the invention, a systems-based approach that integrates the process/structure/property/performance relations for a predictive design of multilevel-structured high performance materials has now been proven to be more useful and economical. The materials by design methodology use the goal/means approach to design a material or process with a desired level of performance. The desired performance decides the property objectives that define the microstructure requirements. The established relationship of processing with microstructure aids in the design of an optimal processing route that results in the desired microstructure.
In certain embodiments, the design approach for the C&P steels/alloys can be represented by further breaking down the four primary elements: processing, structure, properties and performance, and portraying their interactions across a multiscale hierarchy of subsystems by a system flow-block diagram shown in
In certain embodiments, a trial design for the C&P steels starts from deciding the trial composition for the C&P treatment, and producing the test samples. The trial alloy should have high enough hardenability to avoid formation of ferrite, and contains carbon no more than 0.4 wt % for weldability and silicon no less than 1.0 wt % for carbide prohibition. The sample can be hot-rolled or cold-rolled, since the actual heat-treatment for the C&P TRIP steels can occur after either of them.
Furthermore, the trial design is experimentally testified to prove effectiveness of the proposed method, evaluated developed non-equilibrium thermodynamic models and help further iterations of the design. Details of the experimental evaluations are discussed below. In certain embodiments, instead of applying gradual cooling, simplified step-wise cooling is applied, in order to better identify different behaviors at different temperatures, such as kinetics of bainite formation, descent of the Ms temperature, carbon concentration in austenite and morphologies of microstructure.
Initial State Evaluation: The cold-rolled or hot-rolled sample materials are utilized to evaluate as-received Ms temperature, Bs temperature and bainite start time at several different temperatures. The Ms and Bs temperatures are necessary to identify the quenching temperature in the C&P process which lies between those temperatures to insure the fully-bainitic structure. Bainite start time is required to deduce the allowed slowest cooling rate in the quenching step, to totally avoid ferrite formation. These conditions, the initial quenching temperature and critical cooling rate are important process parameters in the C&P treatment. In certain embodiments, they are experimentally evaluated using specific equipment which can both execute heat-treatment and measure dilatation during the heat cycle. The lattice structural change due to phase transformation during the heat-treatment is explicitly identified from the dilatation data, thereby accurately deciding the phase transformation temperature and kinetics. The equipment is either Quench Dilatometer, Gleeble, or Formaster. Acquired data from these experiments are plotted into time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagram. The data are also utilized to evaluate, calibrate and improve the martensite and bainite phase transformation model which is described later.
End State Evaluation: In the C&P process, the final partitioning temperature is critically important, since it decides diverse important features such as the finest lath thickness of bainitic ferrite and retained austenite, austenite stability which is mainly influenced by the carbon concentration and lath thickness, volume fraction of austenite, etc. Hence, intensive analysis on the microstructure, phase compositions and the mechanical performance are performed with regard to the final partitioning temperature. In certain embodiments, the following experimental evaluations are performed to evaluate the status at the final state.
A. Microstructural analysis: Morphology of retained austenite and bainitic ferrite is observed through Scanning Electron Microscopy (SEM) and Electron Backscatter Diffraction (EBSD). After Nital etching, SEM imaging provides morphological information on both retained austenite and bainitic ferrite phases. After vibratory polishing, EBSD analysis helps one better identify the presence of carbides and fresh martensite.
B. X-ray diffraction analysis: X-ray diffraction analysis is effective in identifying volume fraction of austenite phase and its carbon concentration. It measures the diffraction pattern from the very surface of the sample, whose diffraction angle and intensity represent the lattice parameter and phase fraction, respectively. High energy X-ray diffraction experiment is also performed in the Argonne National Laboratory, for the very accurate measurements. X-ray diffraction measurement is suitable for the mean value analysis, since it provides averaged property inside X-ray, whose spot size is typically in the order of millimeters.
C. Atom probe tomography: Dimensional local electrode atom probe tomography (3D LEAP) is performed to accurately measure compositional distribution among different phases and morphological information of them. Samples for 3D LEAP are either prepared by electrical polishing or focused ion beam (FIB) milling. FIB milling is desirable if targeting specific area of interest is necessary. 3D LEAP is suitable for analysis on the local information, whose observation area is typically in the order of sub-micrometers.
D. Mechanical Testing: In order to evaluate mechanical performance such as yield strength, total elongation and fracture ductility, normal mechanical testing is performed. It is also important to evaluate and control the Msσ temperature, in order to maximize strength and ductility at the application temperature. In certain embodiments, the Msσ temperature is evaluated via Bolling-Richman single specimen technique. Hole-expansion ratio is also performed since fracture ductility is as important as uniform ductility in automotive applications where severe deformation is required. It is known that the hole-expansion testing does have wide fluctuations. However, it is shown that inverse of reduced area during tensile testing correlates well with the hole expansion ratio. Hence, it is possible to evaluate reduced area instead of directly evaluating hole-expansion ratio.
Transitional Path Evaluation: In realizing the C&P process, it is important to evaluate how the Ms temperature decreases during the cooling treatment, because the alloy temperature should always be kept at just above the Ms temperature to avoid martensite formation. In this sense, the experimental evaluation is performed to identify the Ms temperature at different process times. In certain embodiments, the Ms temperature at different times is measured by suspending the C&P treatment at the timing of interest, and directly quenching the sample to room temperature. This is performed with an experimental setup where both temperature and dilatation can be measured.
In addition, another important approach is computational modeling of the phenomena happening during the C&P treatment. It is of great significance to decide which the phenomenon to be modeled as well as how to model it, in order to design a material with accuracy and efficiency. Once the models are established and calibrated to the experiments, one can design the optimal material with the aid of computational trial and error, which is much less expensive in both time and money compared to the experiments.
Initial State Modeling: It is beneficial to be able to computationally predict the Ms and Bs temperatures so that one can decide the quench temperature in the C&P process, which is between Ms and Bs, without performing any experiments. The theory for displacive and coupled diffusional/displacive transformation described above is thoroughly incorporated into the fe-martbain model developed by Questek. In certain embodiments, this fe-martbain model is first calibrated to experiments described above, then actively utilized in the design to identify where quench temperature should be set for a composition of interest.
End State Modeling: End state modeling is crucial for predicting the mechanical performance of the C&P TRIP steels. In certain embodiments, intensive modeling is performed, utilizing a composition and a final partitioning temperature as an input. The modeling includes, but is not limited to:
A. Predicting a carbon concentration in the austenite phase at the final partitioning temperature utilizing Thermocalc software under para-equilibrium constraints, with effective stored energy added to the BCC phase. In certain embodiments, the effective stored energy concept is demonstrated and a frictional work term is calibrated using the measured carbon concentration value from X-ray diffraction experiments.
B. Predicting an optimal partitioning temperature utilizing the Olson-Cohen Msσ model which provides the Msσ temperature. It is proved that the important mechanical properties, such as the total elongation and the hole-expansion ratio correlated with a reduced area in tensile testing, are maximized at 20° C. higher than the Msσ temperature. In certain embodiments, by controlling the Msσ temperature 20° C. lower than an application temperature, one can maximize ductility in the application. By having a computational model to predict the Msσ temperature at different partitioning temperatures and alloy compositions, an optimal partitioning temperature is specifically designed, for the Msσ temperature to be 20° C. lower than the application temperature.
C. Predicting the required process time at the final partitioning temperature. This is performed either by utilizing the coupled diffusional/displacive model for bainite kinetics, or by DICTRA simulations for calculating homogenization time required at the final partitioning temperature. In the case of the coupled diffusional/displacive model for bainite kinetics, the model has to be incorporated with a carbon partitioning effect to predict bainite kinetics below the Ms temperature. The DICTRA calculations not only provide the required homogenzation time, which is directly connected to the required process time, but also provides a good estimate of how long the process should take for an alloy composition of interest.
Transitional Path Modeling: It is crucial to evaluate the Ms descent curve during the cooling process in the C&P treatment so as to reach down to the optimal partitioning temperature while avoiding formation of martensite. This curve can be experimentally validated, but it is helpful if the computational approach is enabled. In certain embodiments, the Ms temperature during the cooling treatment is predicted, by combining the DICTRA calculations and the fe-martbain model. Using DICTRA, one can predict a minimum carbon concentration value in the austenite phase during ongoing cooling, where carbon is austenite is not homogenized. By assuming this minimum value gives a new Ms temperature, one can predict that the new Ms by utilizing the fe-martbain model, with a carbon composition set to the minimum value provided by DICTRA. This approach is experimentally calibrated with atom probe tomography, thereby a carbon distribution within the austenite phase is obtained. By comparing experimental and predicted carbon distributions in austenite, an accurate prediction of the Ms descent curve upon cooling is enabled.
Moreover, starting from the trial design and production of the C&P steels, the design also includes continuously and experimentally evaluating the effectiveness of the C&P treatment. Also, this experimental information is thoroughly utilized for the calibrations of the models developed to design the C&P TRIP steels. Once these steps are completed, several design iterations are performed to achieve the best C&P TRIP steels to satisfy automotive requirement, and to have the most accurate models to be available for material designers. This design iteration concept is schematically illustrated in
According to the invention, among other things, the C&P process improves the spot-weldability of steel, by reducing the carbon content. It also improves the strength of the steel, by avoiding the formation of carbides. It further improves the ductility of the steel, by avoiding the formation of carbides. Therefore, the C&P process may find a variety of applications in the fields of high strength sheet steel production, high strength plate steel production, high strength bar and forging steel production and austempered cast iron.
In one embodiment of the C&P process, as shown in
The C&P process according to the invention is superior to the Q&P process shown in
The C&P process according to the invention is also superior to the conventional CFB process shown in
In addition, the C&P process according to the invention also overcomes the drawbacks of the super bainite.
In one aspect, the invention relates to a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel. In one embodiment, the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel includes a composition designed and processed such that the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel meets property objectives comprising a yield strength in a range of about 1000-2000 MPa, a uniform ductility, a desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, a desired level of weldability and an austenite stability designed to have an austenite start temperature Msσ to be equal to an application temperature in range from about 50° C. to −50° C. In one embodiment, the application temperature is about 5° C., or about −20° C. The property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel.
In certain embodiments, the desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio and the desired level of weldability are determined based on the fields of applications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, such as automotive industry, and aircraft industry.
In one embodiment, the composition is processed with a cooling and partitioning treatment.
In one embodiment, the composition comprises carbon (C) no more than 0.4 wt %, silicon (Si) no less than 1.0 wt %, and iron (Fe) in balance.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and molybdenum (Mo) in a range of about 0.4-0.8 wt. %.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and chromium (Cr) in a range of about 0.1-0.9 wt. %.
In one embodiment, the property objectives further comprises a carbon concentration in austenite, Cγ, in a range of about 1.0-1.8 wt. %.
In another aspect, the invention relates to a method for producing a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel.
Referring to
The method also includes heat-treating the alloy to a temperature above Ac3, at step 320, where Ac3 is a temperature at which a transformation from ferrite into austenite is finished.
Furthermore, the method includes succeeding quenching the heat-treated alloy to a bainite region at a temperature between Ms and Bs, at step 330, where Ms is a temperature at which a martensitic transformation starts in the alloy, and Bs is a temperature at which a coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts the alloy.
In addition, the method further includes optimally cooling the quenched alloy to form to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, at step 340, where a cooling ratio of the optimally cooling step is precisely controlled so that the temperature of the alloy continues to be slightly above the Ms temperature which keeps decreasing during the optimally cooling step.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with an austenization or hot rolling treatment.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with a hot rolling treatment and subsequently a cold rolling treatment and a solution treatment.
In one embodiment, the optimally cooling step is performed with gradually cooling or step-wise cooling.
In one embodiment, the property objectives comprises a yield strength in a range of about 1000-2000 MPa, a uniform ductility, a desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio, a desired level of weldability and an austenite stability designed to have an austenite start temperature Msσ to be equal to an application temperature in range from about 50° C. to −50° C. In one embodiment, the application temperature is about 5° C., or about −20° C.
In certain embodiments, the desired total elongation and hole-expansion ratio and the desired level of weldability are determined based on the fields of applications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel.
In one embodiment, the composition comprises carbon (C) no more than 0.4 wt %, silicon (Si) no less than 1.0 wt %, and iron (Fe) in balance.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and molybdenum (Mo) in a range of about 0.4-0.8 wt. %.
In one embodiment, the composition further comprises manganese (Mn) in a range of about 0.2-1.0 wt. %, and chromium (Cr) in a range of about 0.1-0.9 wt. %.
In yet another aspect, the invention relates to a method for designing a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel. In one embodiment, the method includes defining property objectives of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, wherein the property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel; designing a composition of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel according to the property objectives; and processing the composition to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein the processing step is performed with a cooling and partitioning process.
In one embodiment, the processing step comprises solidifying the composition to form an alloy; and reheating the alloy.
In one embodiment, the cooling and partitioning process comprises heat-treating the alloy to a temperature above Ac3, where Ac3 is a temperature at which a transformation from ferrite into austenite is finished; succeeding quenching the heat-treated alloy to a bainite region at a temperature between Ms and Bs, wherein Ms is a temperature at which a martensitic transformation starts in the alloy, and B, is a temperature at which a coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts the alloy; and optimally cooling the quenched alloy to form to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein a cooling ratio of the optimally cooling step is precisely controlled so that the temperature of the alloy continues to be slightly above the Ms temperature which keeps decreasing during the optimally cooling step.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with an austenization or hot rolling treatment.
In one embodiment, the heat-treating step is performed with a hot rolling treatment and subsequently a cold rolling treatment and a solution treatment.
In one embodiment, the optimally cooling step is performed with gradually cooling or step-wise cooling.
In one embodiment, the composition comprises carbon (C) no more than 0.4 wt %, silicon (Si) no less than 1.0 wt %, and iron (Fe) in balance.
In a further aspect, the invention relates to a method for designing a carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, In one embodiment, the method includes determining a composition, and producing a trial alloy from the trial composition, wherein the trial alloy has substantially high hardenability to avoid formation of ferrite, and contains carbon no more than 0.4 wt % for weldability and silicon no less than 1.0 wt % for carbide prohibition; performing a cooling and partitioning treatment to the trial alloy, and experimentally evaluating the trial alloy at an initial state, a transitional path, and an end state of the cooling and partitioning treatment to obtain trial parameters comprising at least a quenching temperature, a descent of a Ms temperature, and a final partitioning temperature; refining the composition by computational material engineering models using the trial parameters, such that an alloy formed of the refined composition meets property objectives of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel, wherein the property objectives are design specifications of the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel.
In one embodiment, at the initial state, Ms temperature, Bs temperature used to identify a quenching temperature, and a bainite start time at different temperatures are measured; at the transitional path, the Ms temperature is measured at different process times so as to determine a descent of the Ms temperature; and at the end state, a final partitioning temperature, mechanical performance, austenite stability, and microstructures are measured.
In one embodiment, the cooling and partitioning treatment comprises heat-treating the alloy to a temperature above Ac3, where Ac3 is a temperature at which a transformation from ferrite into austenite is finished; succeeding quenching the heat-treated alloy to a bainite region at a temperature between Ms and Bs, wherein Ms is a temperature at which a martensitic transformation starts in the alloy, and Bs is a temperature at which a coupled diffusional/displacive bainitic transformation starts the alloy; and optimally cooling the quenched alloy to form to form the carbide-free bainite and retained austenite steel that meets the property objectives, wherein a cooling ratio of the optimally cooling step is precisely controlled so that the temperature of the alloy continues to be slightly above the Ms temperature which keeps decreasing during the optimally cooling step.
In one embodiment, the optimally cooling step is performed with gradually cooling or step-wise cooling.
These and other aspects of the present invention are further described below. Without intent to limit the scope of the invention, examples according to the embodiments of the present invention are given below. Note that titles or subtitles may be used in the examples for convenience of a reader, which in no way should limit the scope of the invention. Moreover, certain theories are proposed and disclosed herein; however, in no way they, whether they are right or wrong, should limit the scope of the invention so long as the invention is practiced according to the invention without regard for any particular theory or scheme of action.
In one embodiment, the trial (initial) design initiated from deciding the trial composition for the C&P treatment, and producing the test samples. In this exemplary example, the trial alloy has high enough hardenability to avoid formation of ferrite, contains no more carbon than 0.4 wt % for weldability and no less silicon than 1.0 wt % for carbide prohibition. Two different samples were produced by hot-rolling or cold-rolling succeeded by hot-rolling from Nippon Steel & Sumitomo Metal Corp. Table 1 shows the composition of the initial design. Mn and Mo was added to provide sufficient hardenability to avoid formation of ferrite in the initial quenching.
Heat Treatment:—The C&P treatment was performed for the produced trial samples using Gleeble 3400 (Dynamic Systems Inc., Poestenkill, N.Y.), where dilatation data was obtained during the heat-treatment, in order to experimentally validate the C&P process. Tables 2 and 3 and
Descent of the Ms Temperature:
Microstructure Refinement:
Mechanical Testing: Bolling-Richman single specimen technique was performed for the six samples after the C&P treatment described in Tables 2 and 3.
XRD Experiments: X-ray diffraction analysis was performed for the six samples after the C&P treatment listed in Tables 2 and 3.
Local Electrode Atom Probe Tomography (LEAP): LEAP analysis shown in
Prediction of Time-Temperature-Transformation (TTT) Curve: Fe-martbain model was calibrated with dilatometric experiments as shown in
Prediction of Carbon Concentration in Austenite:
Strength Prediction: The strength is determined by
Strength=−0.9246*Temperature+Solid Solution Strength+(Hall-Petch Lath Boundary Strength).
In this exemplary example, the strength model is incorporated with Hall-Petch effect predicts strength well. The strength prediction is shown in
In certain embodiment, the strength model be further sophisticated by incorporating more literature data, including dislocation hardening term, and so on.
Prediction of the Msσ Temperature: Using the Olson-Cohen Msσ model described above, the Msσ temperature was predicted. Due to the dramatic change of lath-thickness depending on the final partitioning temperature, The Hall-Petch effect is newly incorporated into the strength model to calculate the mechanical driving force (ΔGMech). The carbon concentration model is also incorporated. Predicted Msσ values were compared to experiments shown in
With the important modeling tools prepared and calibrated to the experiments with samples from trial design, new design has been determined.
The foregoing description of the exemplary embodiments of the present invention has been presented only for the purposes of illustration and description and is not intended to be exhaustive or to limit the invention to the precise forms disclosed. Many modifications and variations are possible in light of the above teaching.
The embodiments were chosen and described in order to explain the principles of the invention and their practical application so as to activate others skilled in the art to utilize the invention and various embodiments and with various modifications as are suited to the particular use contemplated. Alternative embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art to which the present invention pertains without departing from its spirit and scope. Accordingly, the scope of the present invention is defined by the appended claims rather than the foregoing description and the exemplary embodiments described therein.
This application claims priority to and the benefit of, pursuant to 35 U.S.C. § 119(e), of U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 62/640,096, filed Mar. 8, 2018, entitled “METHOD FOR PRODUCING CARBIDE-FREE BAINITE AND RETAINED AUSTENITE STEELS BY OPTIMIZED COOLING,” by Kazuhiko Nishioka and Gregory B. Olson, which is incorporated herein by reference in its entirety. Some references, which may include patents, patent applications and various publications, are cited in a reference list and discussed in the description of this invention. The citation and/or discussion of such references is provided merely to clarify the description of the invention and is not an admission that any such reference is “prior art” to the invention described herein. All references cited and discussed in this specification are incorporated herein by reference in their entireties and to the same extent as if each reference was individually incorporated by reference. In terms of notation, hereinafter, “[n]” represents the nth reference cited in the reference list. For example, [23] represents the 23th reference cited in the reference list, namely, Nicholas J. Wengrenovich and Gregory B. Olson. Optimization of a TRIP steel for adiabatic fragment protection. Materials Today: Proceedings, S2:S639-S642, 2015.
This invention was made with government support under 70NANB14H012 awarded by the National Institute of Standards and Technology. The government has certain rights in the invention.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2019/021298 | 3/8/2019 | WO | 00 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
62640096 | Mar 2018 | US |