Carbon blacks

FIELD OF THE INVENTION
The present invention relates to new carbon blacks which are suitable for various applications and particularly well suited for use in plastic and rubber compositions.
BACKGROUND
Carbon blacks may be utilized as pigments, fillers, reinforcing agents, and for a variety of other applications. They are widely used in the preparation of rubber compositions and plastic compositions where it is desirable to achieve an optimal combination of compound processing characteristics and physical properties of fabricated parts.
Carbon blacks are generally characterized on the basis of their properties including, but not limited to, their surface areas, surface chemistry, aggregate sizes, and particle sizes. The properties of carbon blacks are analytically determined by tests known to the art, including iodine adsorption number (I.sub.2 No.), dibutyl phthalate adsorption (DBP), Tint value (TINT), Dst, Dmode and M-Ratio that is defined as the median Stokes diameter divided by the mode Stokes diameter (M-Ratio=Dst/Dmode).
From the prior art several references are known. These include U.S. Pat. Nos. 4,366,139; 4,221,772; 3,799,788; 3,787,562; Soviet Union 1279991; Canadian 455504; Japanese 61-047759; British 1022988; and Japanese 61-283635. None of the aforementioned references disclose the carbon black products of the present invention. Moreover, none of the aforementioned references describe the use for which the carbon blacks of the present invention are intended.
SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION
We have discovered ten new classes of carbon blacks advantageous for use in rubber and plastic compositions where compound processing and physical properties such as mixing energy, viscosity, cure rate, extrusion shrinkage, tensile, fatigue life, compression set, hardness, resistivity and surface appearance are important. These carbon blacks have been found to provide unique combinations of properties that make them especially well suited for use in extrusion, molded part, hose and belt applications.
The first class of furnace carbon blacks has an Iodine adsorption number (I.sub.2 No.) of 17-23 mg/g (milligrams I.sub.2 per gram carbon black) and a DBP (dibutyl phthalate value) of 115-150 cc/100 g (cubic centimeters of dibutyl phthalate per 100 grams carbon black). Preferably this class of carbon blacks is characterized by having an I.sub.2 No. of about 20 mg/g.
The second class of furnace carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 10-19 mg/g and a DBP of 70-95 cc/100 g.
The third class of furnace carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 12-20 mg/g and a DBP of 34-65 cc/100 g. Preferably this class of carbon blacks is characterized by having an I.sub.2 No. of 14-18 mg/g and a DBP of 36-55 cc/100 g, and more preferably a DBP of either 36-42 cc/100 g or 45-55 cc/100 g.
The fourth class of furnace carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 12-18 mg/g and a DBP of 28-33 cc/100 g. Preferably this class of carbon blacks is characterized by having an I.sub.2 No. of about 15 mg/g.
The fifth class of furnace carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 28-43 mg/g, and a DBP of 28-47 cc/100 g. Preferably this class of carbon blacks is characterized by having an I.sub.2 No. of 30-42 mg/g.
The sixth class of carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 8-32 mg/g, a DBP of 28-150 cc/100 g and an M-Ratio of 1.25-2.00.
The seventh class of carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 33-70 mg/g, a DBP of 28-60 cc/100 g and an M-Ratio of 1.25 -2.00.
The eighth class of carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 42-50 mg/g, a DBP of 61-105 cc/100 g and an M-Ratio of 1.25-2.00.
The ninth class of carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 51-62 mg/g, a DBP of 61-125 cc/100 g and an M-Ratio of 1.25-2.00.
The tenth class of carbon blacks has an I.sub.2 No. of 63-70 mg/g, a DBP of 61-105 cc/100 g and an M-Ratio of 1.25-2.00.
We have also discovered new classes of rubber and plastic compositions containing the carbon blacks.
The carbon blacks of the present invention may be produced in a furnace carbon black reactor having a combustion zone, a transition zone, and a reaction zone. A carbon black yielding feedstock is injected into a hot combustion gas stream. The resultant mixture of hot combustion gases and feedstock passes into the reaction zone. Pyrolysis of the carbon black yielding feedstock is stopped by quenching the mixture after the carbon blacks of the present invention have been formed. Preferably pyrolysis is stopped by injecting a quenching fluid. The process for preparing the novel carbon blacks of the present invention will be described in greater detail hereinafter.
The rubbers and plastics for which the novel carbon blacks of this invention are effective include natural and synthetic rubbers and plastics. Generally, amounts of the carbon black product ranging from about 10 to about 300 parts by weight can be used for each 100 parts by weight of rubber or plastic.
Among the rubbers or plastics suitable for use with the present invention are natural rubber, synthetic rubber and their derivatives such as chlorinated rubber; copolymers of from about 10 to about 70 percent by weight of styrene and from about 90 to about 30 percent by weight of butadiene such as copolymer of 19 parts styrene and 81 parts butadiene, a copolymer of 30 parts styrene and 70 parts butadiene, a copolymer of 43 parts styrene and 57 parts butadiene and a copolymer of 50 parts styrene and 50 parts butadiene; polymers and copolymers of conjugated dienes such as polybutadiene, polyisoprene, polychloroprene, and the like, and copolymers of such conjugated dienes with an ethylenic group-containing monomer copolymerizable therewith such as styrene, methyl styrene, chlorostyrene, acrylonitrile, 2-vinyl-pyridine, 5-methyl-2-vinylpyridine, 5-ethyl-2-vinylpyridine, 2-methyl-5-vinylpyridine, alkyl-substituted acrylates, vinyl ketone, methyl isopropenyl ketone, methyl vinyl ether, alphamethylene carboxylic acids and the esters and amides thereof such as acrylic acid and dialkylacrylic acid amide; also suitable for use herein are copolymers of ethylene and other high alpha olefins such as propylene, butene-1 and penetene-1; particularly preferred are the ethylene-propylene copolymers wherein the ethylene content ranges from 20 to 90 percent by weight and also the ethylene-propylene polymers which additionally contain a third monomer such as dicyclopentadiene, 1,4-hexadiene and methylene norbornene. Additionally preferred polymeric compositions are olefins such as polypropylene and polyethylene.
An advantage of the carbon blacks of the present invention is that the carbon blacks are useful for incorporation into natural rubbers, synthetic rubbers, plastics or blends thereof for industrial applications, particularly where compound processing and part performance characteristics are important.
A further advantage of the carbon blacks of the present invention is that certain of the carbon blacks of the present invention will replace blends of carbon blacks in applications that currently require the use of blends of carbon blacks to achieve desired performance characteristics.
Other advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following more detailed description of the invention.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS
FIG. 1 is a cross-sectional view of a portion of one type of furnace carbon black reactor which may be utilized to produce the carbon blacks of the present invention.
FIG. 2 is a sample histogram of the weight fraction of the aggregates of a carbon black sample versus the Stokes Diameter in a given sample.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION
The analytical properties of each of the ten classes of carbon blacks of the present invention are set forth in Table 1 below:
TABLE 1______________________________________Classes of Novel Carbon BlacksClass I.sub.2 No. DBP M-Ratio______________________________________First 17-23 115-150 --First Preferred 20 115-150 --Second 10-19 70-95 --Third 12-20 34-65 --Third Preferred 14-18 36-55 --Third More Preferred 14-18 36-42 --Third More Preferred 14-18 45-55 --Fourth 12-18 28-33 --Fourth Preferred 15 28-33 --Fifth 28-43 28-47 --Fifth Preferred 30-42 28-47 --Sixth 8-32 28-150 1.25-2.00Seventh 33-70 28-60 1.25-2.00Eighth 42-50 61-105 1.25-2.00Ninth 51-62 61-125 1.25-2.00Tenth 63-70 61-105 1.25-2.00______________________________________
The carbon blacks of the present invention may be produced in a modular, also referred to as "staged", furnace carbon black reactor. A section of a typical modular furnace carbon black reactor which may be utilized to produce the carbon black of the present invention is depicted in FIG. 1. Other details of a typical modular furnace carbon black reactor may be found, for example, in the description contained in U.S. Pat. No. 3,922,335, the disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference. A carbon black reactor particularly well-suited for the production of the carbon blacks of the present invention is described in commonly assigned U.S. patent application Ser. No. 07/818,943, filed Jan. 10, 1992, the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated by reference. The carbon blacks of the Examples described herein were made by the process described in the '943 application.
The '943 application describes a process for producing carbon blacks wherein auxiliary hydrocarbon is added to the reaction zone of a multistage reactor and the primary combustion and overall combustion of the reaction are adjusted so that the SSI of the process is less than zero. The SSI of the process may be determined by the following relationships: ##EQU1## .vertline.SAS.sub.mf .vertline.=Absolute value of SAS.sub.mf ; .DELTA.(DBP).sub.mf =the change in DBPA of the carbon black due to a change in feedstock flow rate while all other process operating conditions are held constant;
.DELTA.(Iodine Number).sub.mf =the change in iodine adsorption number of the carbon black due to a change in feedstock flow rate while all other process operating conditions are held constant;
.DELTA.(DBP).sub.ah =the change in DBPA of the carbon black due to a change in auxiliary hydrocarbon flow rate while all other process operating conditions are held constant; and
.DELTA.(Iodine Number).sub.ah =the change in iodine adsorption number of the carbon black due to a change in auxiliary hydrocarbon flow rate while all other process operating conditions are held constant.
The "auxiliary hydrocarbon" comprises hydrogen or any hydrocarbon having a molar hydrogen-to-carbon ratio greater than the molar hydrogen-to-carbon ratio of the feedstock.
Referring to FIG. 1, the carbon blacks of the present invention may be produced in a furnace carbon black reactor 2, having a combustion zone 10, which has a zone of converging diameter 11, transition zone 12, entry section 18, and reaction zone 19. The diameter of the combustion zone 10, up to the point where the zone of converging diameter 11 begins, is shown as D-1; the diameter of zone 12, as D-2; the diameters of the stepped entry section, 18, as D-4, D-5, D-6, and D-7; and the diameter of zone 19, as D-3. The length of the combustion zone 10, up to the point where the zone of converging diameter 11 begins, is shown as L-1; the length of the zone of converging diameter is shown as L-2; the length of the transition zone is shown as L-3; and the lengths of the steps in the reactor entry section, 18, as L-4, L-5, L-6 and L-7.
To produce carbon blacks, hot combustion gases are generated in combustion zone 10, by contacting a liquid or gaseous fuel with a suitable oxidant stream such as air, oxygen, mixtures of air and oxygen or the like. Among the fuels suitable for use in contacting the oxidant stream in combustion zone 10 to generate the hot combustion gases are any of the readily combustible gas, vapor, or liquid streams such as natural gas, hydrogen, carbon monoxide, methane, acetylene, alcohol, or kerosene. It is generally preferred, however, to utilize fuels having a high content of carbon-containing components and in particular, hydrocarbons. The ratio of air to natural gas utilized to produce the carbon blacks of the present invention may preferably be from about 10:1 to about 100:1. To facilitate the generation of hot combustion gases, the oxidant stream may be preheated.
The hot combustion gas stream flows downstream from zones 10 and 11 into zones 12, 18, and 19. The direction of the flow of hot combustion gases is shown in the figure by the arrow. Carbon black-yielding feedstock 30 is introduced at point 32 (located in zone 12), and/or at point 70 (located in zone 11). Suitable for use herein as carbon black-yielding hydrocarbon feedstocks, which are readily volatilizable under the conditions of the reaction, are unsaturated hydrocarbons such as acetylene; olefins such as ethylene, propylene, butylene; aromatics such as benzene, toluene and xylene; certain saturated hydrocarbons; and other hydrocarbons such as kerosenes, naphthalenes, terpenes, ethylene tars, aromatic cycle stocks and the like.
The distance from the end of the zone of converging diameter 11 to point 32 is shown as F-1. Generally, carbon black-yielding feedstock 30 is injected in the form of a plurality of streams which penetrate into the interior regions of the hot combustion gas stream to insure a high rate of mixing and shearing of the carbon black-yielding feedstock by the hot combustion gases so as to rapidly and completely decompose and convert the feedstock to carbon black.
Auxiliary hydrocarbon is introduced at point 70 through probe 72 or through auxiliary hydrocarbon passages 75 in the walls which form the boundaries of zone 12 of the carbon black forming process or through auxiliary hydrocarbon passages 76 in the walls which form the boundaries of zones 18 and/or 19 of the carbon black forming process. The auxiliary hydrocarbon may be introduced at any location between the point immediately after the initial combustion reaction of the first-stage fuel and the point immediately before the end of formation of carbon black provided that unreacted auxiliary hydrocarbon eventually enters the reaction zone.
The distance from point 32 to point 70 is shown as H-1.
In the Examples described herein, the auxiliary hydrocarbon was introduced through either three or four orifices in the same axial plane as the carbon black yielding feedstock streams. The orifices are arranged in an alternating pattern, one feedstock, the next auxiliary hydrocarbon, spaced evenly around the outer periphery of section 12. As will be noted, however, this is merely exemplary and is not intended to be limiting of the methods usable for introducing auxiliary hydrocarbon.
The mixture of carbon black-yielding feedstock and hot combustion gases flows downstream through zone 12 into zone 18 and then into zone 19. Quench 60, located at point 62, injecting quenching fluid 50, which may be water, is utilized to stop chemical reaction when carbon blacks are formed. Point 62 may be determined in any manner known to the art for selecting the position of a quench to stop pyrolysis. One method for determining the position of the quench to stop pyrolysis is by determining the point at which an acceptable toluene extract level for the carbon black is reached. Toluene extract level may be measured by using ASTM Test D1618-83 "Carbon Black Extractables--Toluene Discoloration". Q is the distance from the beginning of zone 18 to quench point 62, and will vary according to the position of Quench 60.
After the mixture of hot combustion gases and carbon black-yielding feedstock is quenched, the cooled gases pass downstream into any conventional cooling and separating means whereby the carbon blacks are recovered. The separation of the carbon black from the gas stream is readily accomplished by conventional means such as a precipitator, cyclone separator or bag filter. This separation may be followed by pelletizing using, for example, a wet pelletizer.
The following testing procedures are used in evaluating the analytical and physical properties of the carbon blacks of the present invention.
Iodine adsorption number of the carbon blacks (I.sub.2 No.) was determined according to ASTM Test Procedure D 1510. Tinting strength (Tint) of the carbon blacks was determined according to ASTM Test Procedure D3265-85a. The DBP (dibutyl phthalate value) of the carbon blacks was determined according to the procedure set forth in ASTM D3493-86. The cetyl-trimethyl ammonium bromide absorption value (CTAB) of the carbon blacks was determined according to ASTM Test Procedure D3765-85.
Dmode, and Dst of the carbon blacks were determined from a histogram of the weight fraction of carbon black versus the Stokes diameter of the carbon black aggregates, as shown in FIG. 2. The data used to generate the histogram are determined by the use of a disk centrifuge such as the one manufactured by Joyce Loebl Co. Ltd. of Tyne and Wear, United Kingdom. The following procedure is a modification of the procedure described in the instruction manual of the Joyce Loebl disk centrifuge file reference DCF 4.008 published on Feb. 1, 1985, the teachings of which are hereby incorporated by reference, and was used in determining the data.
The procedure is as follows. 10 mg (milligrams) of a carbon black sample are weighed in a weighing vessel, then added to 50 cc of a solution of 10% absolute ethanol and 90% distilled water which is made 0.05% NONIDET P-40 surfactant (NONIDET P-40 is a registered trademark for a surfactant manufactured and sold by Shell Chemical Co.). The resulting suspension is dispersed by means of ultrasonic energy for 15 minutes using Sonifier Model No. W 385, manufactured and sold by Heat Systems Ultrasonics Inc., Farmingdale, N.Y.
Prior to the disk centrifuge run the following data are entered into the computer which records the data from the disk centrifuge:
1. The specific gravity of carbon black, taken as 1.86 g/cc;
2. The volume of the solution of the carbon black dispersed in a solution of water and ethanol, which in this instance is 0.5 cc.;
3. The volume of spin fluid, which in this instance is 10 cc of water;
4. The viscosity of the spin fluid, which in this instance is taken as 0.933 centipoise at 23 degrees C;
5. The density of the spin fluid, which in this instance is 0.9975 g/cc at 23 degrees C;
6. The disk speed, which in this instance is 8000 rpm;
7. The data sampling interval, which in this instance is 1 second. The disk centrifuge is operated at 8000 rpm while the stroboscope is operating. 10 cc of distilled water are injected into the spinning disk as the spin fluid. The turbidity level is set to 0; and 1 cc of the solution of 10% absolute ethanol and 90% distilled water is injected as a buffer liquid. The cut and boost buttons of the disk centrifuge are then operated to produce a smooth concentration gradient between the spin fluid and the buffer liquid and the gradient is monitored visually. When the gradient becomes smooth such that there is no distinguishable boundary between the two fluids, 0.5 cc of the dispersed carbon black in aqueous ethanol solution is injected into the spinning disk and data collection is started immediately. If streaming occurs the run is aborted. The disk is spun for 20 minutes following the injection of the dispersed carbon black in aqueous ethanol solution. Following the 20 minutes of spinning, the disk is stopped, the temperature of the spin fluid is measured, and the average of the temperature of the spin fluid measured at the beginning of the run and the temperature of the spin fluid measured at the end of the run is entered into the computer which records the data from the disk centrifuge. The data is analyzed according to the standard Stokes equation and is presented using the following definitions:
Carbon black aggregate--a discrete, rigid colloidal entity that is the smallest dispersible unit; it is composed of extensively coalesced particles;
Stokes diameter--the diameter of a sphere which sediments in a viscous medium in a centrifugal or gravitational field according to the Stokes equation. A non-spherical object, such as a carbon black aggregate, may also be represented in terms of the Stokes diameter if it is considered as behaving as a smooth, rigid sphere of the same density, and rate of sedimentation as the object. The customary units are expressed in nanometer diameters.
Mode (Dmode for reporting purposes)--The Stokes diameter at the point of the peak (Point A of FIG. 2 herein) of the distribution curve for Stokes diameter.
Median Stokes diameter--(Dst for reporting purposes) the point on the distribution curve of Stokes diameter where 50% by weight of the sample is either larger or smaller. It therefore represents the median value of the determination.
The modulus, tensile and elongation of the EPDM compositions were measured by the procedure set forth in ASTM D412-87.
The Shore A Hardness of the EPDM compositions was determined according to the procedure set forth in ASTM D-2240-86.
Rebound data for the EPDM compositions was determined according to the procedure set forth in ASTM D1054, utilizing a ZWICK Rebound Resilience Tester, Model 5109, manufactured by Zwick of America, Inc., Post Office Box 997, East Windsor, Conn. 06088. Instructions for determining the rebound values accompany the instrument.
The Compression set of the EPDM compositions was determined according to the procedure set forth in ASTM D395, wherein the composition was tested at 150.degree. F. for 70 hours.
The extrusion shrinkage of the EPDM compositions was determined by the procedure set forth in ASTM D-3674 The extrusion shrinkage was measured on the BRABENDER extruder at 100.degree. C. and 50 rpm using a 5 mm diameter die.
The viscosity of the EPDM compositions was determined by the procedure set forth in ASTM D-1646 using a Monsanto MPT capillary rheometer maintained at 100.degree. C. using a die having a ratio of L/D'=16 and D=0.0787 mm (millimeter). The shear rate ranged from 10 to 150 1/seconds.
Mixing energy is the total amount of energy put into the compositions which is determined by integrating the mixing torque curve over the course of the mixing cycle, described hereinafter.
Cure characteristics of the EPDM compositions were measured using a Monsanto MDR curemeter maintained at 160.degree. C. The time to reach 90% cure reaction (t'90), the total torque change during cure reaction (.DELTA.L) and cure rate index (CRI; (CRI=1/(t'90-ts1).times.100) where ts1=the time when the torque level is 1 unit above minimum torque (ts1 is also referred to as scorch time)) are reported for the example EPDM compositions. The tests were conducted according to the instructions furnished with the Monsanto MDR curemeter.
Composition resistivity was measured on plaque samples 2 inches wide by 6 inches long by 0.085 inch thick. The plaques were painted on both ends with a half inch width of silver paint. The sample was conditioned to produce a stable reading by cycling from room temperature to 100.degree. C. and back to room temperature, followed by aging at 90.degree. C. for 24 hours. The stabilized resistivity was measured at the end of the aging cycle, and once again after the sample was allowed to cool back to room temperature.
The effectiveness and advantages of the present invention will be further illustrated by the following examples.
EXAMPLES 1-9
Examples of the novel carbon blacks of the present invention were prepared in a reactor generally described herein, and as depicted in FIG. 1, utilizing the reactor conditions and geometry set forth in Table 3. The fuel utilized in the combustion reaction was natural gas. The auxiliary hydrocarbon used was also natural gas. The liquid feedstock utilized had the properties indicated in Table 2 below:
TABLE 2______________________________________Feedstock PropertiesEXAMPLES 1-8 9______________________________________Hydrogen/Carbon Ratio 0.93 1.00Hydrogen (wt %) 7.19 7.71Carbon (wt %) 92.1 91.94Sulfur (wt %) 0.30 0.23Nitrogen (wt %) 0.41 0.22A.P.I. Gravity 15.6/15.6.degree. C. -1.6 +6.4(60/60.degree. F.) [ASTM D-287]Specific Gravity 15.5/15.6.degree. C. 1.092 1.026(60/60.degree. F.) [ASTM D-287]Viscosity, SUS (54.4.degree. C.) m.sup.2 /s 2.6 .times. 10.sup.-5 1.3 .times. 10.sup.-1[ASTM D-88]Viscosity, SUS (98.9.degree. C.) m.sup.2 /s 5.2 .times. 10.sup.-6 4.8 .times. 10.sup.-6[ASTM D-88]______________________________________
The reactor conditions and geometry were as set forth in Table 3 below.
TABLE 3__________________________________________________________________________Reactor Geometry and Operating ConditionsExample No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9__________________________________________________________________________D-1 (m) 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18 0.18D-2 (m) 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.13 0.11 0.13 0.13 0.10D-3 (m) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91D-4 (m) 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.25 0.26 0.25 0.25 0.36 0.23D-5 (m) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.33 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91D-6 (m) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91D-7 (m) 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91 0.69 0.69 0.69 0.91L-1 (M) 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61 0.61L-2 (m) 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30L-3 (m) 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23 0.23L-4 (m) 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.30 0.14 0.30L-5 (m) 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.23 0.10 0.10 0.10 0.11L-6 (m) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00L-7 (m) 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00 0.00F-1 (m) 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11 0.11Q (m) 7.93 7.93 7.93 7.93 7.93 7.93 19.8 7.93 12.2Combustion Air (SCMS) 0.373 0.6341 0.634 0.634 0.634 0.634 0.448 0.634 0.472Comb. Air Preheat (K) 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755 755Burner Nat. Gas (10.sup.2 .times. 0.9 2.0 2.0 2.0 1.8 2.5 1.4 2.0 1.0SCMS)Feedstock Injection 0.198 0.218 0.198 0.198 0.185 0.198 0.198 0.206 0.226Orifice Dia. (cm)No. Feedstock Injection 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3OrificesFeedstock Rate (10.sup.4 .times. 1.3 2.1 1.9 2.3 1.3 1.9 1.6 2.1 1.2m.sup.3 /s)Feedstock Temp. (K) 483 463 451 438 467 439 467 415 362K+ Conc. (g/m.sup.3) 0.0 87.1 81.0 0.0 388.0 11.4 0.8 20.3 443Aux. HC Injection 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.635 0.508Orifice Diameter (cm)No. Aux. HC Injection 3 3 3 3 4 3 4 4 3Orifices (*)Aux. HC Rate (10.sup.2 .times. 2.4 3.5 2.1 3.9 3.1 2.1 1.7 0.0 3.5SCMS)Primary Combustion (%) 400 400 400 400 300 325 400 400 500Overall Combustion (%) 21.7 22.5 25.4 21.5 22.9 25.5 25.4 25.8 25.6__________________________________________________________________________ (*) The feedstock and auxiliary hydrocarbon orifices were arranged in th same axial plane in an alternating sequence around the periphery of the reactor. HC = hydrocarbon
The carbon blacks produced in runs 1-9 were then analyzed according to the procedures described herein. The analytical properties of the carbon blacks were as set forth in Table 4.
TABLE 4__________________________________________________________________________Carbon Black Analytical PropertiesExample 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9__________________________________________________________________________I.sub.2 No. (mg/g 22.1 13.6 28.0 16.3 40.7 28.8 28.7 57.9 16.5DBP (cc/100 g) 132.5 37.1 35.8 84.6 43.1 64.5 119.5 95.8 30.0CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 25.3 17.3 29.8 18.7 45.1 28.7 27.8 53.1 18.3Tint (%) 33.0 33.4 54.7 32.5 85.6 45.7 42.3 74.2 31.1Dmode (nm) 289 246 212 276 176 212 252 140 242Dst (nm) 459 390 300 492 240 312 348 180 310M-Ratio 1.59 1.58 1.42 1.78 1.36 1.47 1.38 1.29 1.29__________________________________________________________________________
These carbon blacks and four control carbon blacks were utilized in the following examples. The four control carbon blacks utilized, A-D, had the analytical properties shown below in Table 5:
TABLE 5______________________________________Control Carbon Black Analytical PropertiesControl A B C D______________________________________Type GPF FEF Thermal SRFI.sub.2 No. (mg/g) 35.4 40.0 8.2 29.9DBP (cc/100 g) 91.0 111.7 37.5 68.5CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 35.9 44.3 9.9 30.1Tint (%) 57.8 64.6 21.7 51.6Dmode (nm) 206 144 416 256Dst (nm) 220 186 492 288M-Ratio 1.07 1.29 1.18 1.12______________________________________ GPF = general purpose furnace FEF = fast extruding furnace Thermal = carbon black produced by a thermal process SRF = semi reinforcing furnace
EXAMPLE 10
The carbon blacks of the present invention produced in example runs 1-9 were incorporated into EPDM (ethylene-propylene diene polymethylene) compositions and compared to EPDM compositions incorporating the four control carbon blacks. The EPDM compositions were prepared utilizing each of the carbon black samples in an amount of 200 parts by weight in the EPDM Composition Formulation shown below in Table 6.
TABLE 6______________________________________EPDM Composition FormulationINGREDIENT Part by Weight______________________________________EPDM 100Carbon Black 200Sunpar 2280 Oil 100Zinc Oxide 5Stearic Acid 1TMTDS 2.7Butyl Zimate 2.7Methyl Zimate 2.7Sulfur 0.5Sulfasan R 1.7______________________________________ EPDM EXXON VISTALON .RTM. 5600, manufactured and sold by EXXON Corporation, Houston, Texas Sunpar 2280 A trademarked oil manufactured and sold by Sun Oil Company; TMTDS Tetramethylthiuram disulfide; Butyl Zimate A trademarked zinc dibutyldithiocarbamate manufactured and sold by R. T. Vanderbilt Co.; Methyl Zimate A trademarked zinc dimethyldithiocarbamate manufactured an sold by R. T. Vanderbilt Co.; Sulfasan R A trademarked 4,4dithiodimorpholine, manufactured and sold by Monsanto Co., St. Louis, Missouri
The EPDM compositions were produced as follows.
A Banbury BR mixer was started and maintained at a temperature of 45.degree. C. and a rotor speed of 77 RPM. EPDM was added to the mixer and mixed for approximately 30 seconds. The Sunpar 2280 oil, zinc oxide and stearic acid, were added to the EPDM and mixed for approximately 2 additional minutes. The carbon black was added to the mixture and the temperature of the mixing chamber was cooled and maintained at a temperature of below approximately 135.degree. C. The carbon black containing EPDM mixture was mixed for approximately 41/2 minutes and then the curing agents, TMTDS, Butyl Zimate, Methyl Zimate, Sulfur and Sulfasan R, were added to the mixture. The resulting mixture was mixed for approximately 11/2 minutes while the temperature was maintained at below approximately 135.degree. C. The batch composition was then discharged from the mixer and analyzed by the techniques described herein.
The EPDM compositions produced using the carbon blacks of the present invention produced in runs 1-9 described herein had the performance characteristics set forth below in Table 7.
The EPDM compositions incorporating the control carbon blacks A-D were also evaluated according to the procedures described herein. The results are set forth in Tables 8-13 below, where comparisons between EPDM compositions containing carbon blacks of the present invention and EPDM compositions containing the most appropriate control carbon black are made.
TABLE 7__________________________________________________________________________Comparison of EPDM Composition Performance.Example No. 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9__________________________________________________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 22.1 13.6 28.0 16.3 40.7 28.8 28.7 57.9 16.5DBP (cc/100 g) 132.5 37.1 35.8 84.6 43.1 64.5 119.5 95.8 30.0CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 25.3 17.3 29.8 18.7 45.1 28.7 27.8 53.1 18.3Tint (%) 33.0 33.4 54.7 32.5 85.6 45.7 42.3 74.2 31.1Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 289 246 212 276 176 212 252 140 242Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 459 390 300 492 240 312 348 180 310M-Ratio (Median/Mode) 1.59 1.58 1.42 1.78 1.36 1.47 1.38 1.29 1.29EPDM Composition Performance at 200 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 16300 12100 10900 18000 14100 16000 22900 23700 9300Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 2600 1540 1590 1920 1720 1790 2790 3130 1310Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.2) 1300 918 876 1110 943 1139 1348 1571 687Extrusion Rate (g/min) 37.0 35.3 42.3 40.0 34.8 34.2 47.1 50.6 41.6Extrusion Shrinkage (%) 12.5 37.6 43.0 21.7 41.1 27.1 13.8 12.5 45.5t'90 (min) 8.23 11.8 11.9 9.7 9.6 10.2 10.5 9.9 13.7.DELTA.L (g.m) 238 234 206 272 271 247 308 218 230Hardness (Shore A) 79 57 65 69 65 67 76 79 50E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 662 184 175 392 192 299 540 628 112Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 1069 779 974 925 1009 977 929 1268 740Elong. at Break (%) 243 592 623 389 595 397 232 237 724Rebound (%) 39 51.7 43.7 47.4 34.2 44.2 40.0 30.5 51.8Compression Set (%) 55 56 50 52 65 54 54 58 51(70 hrs, 150.degree. C.)Resistivity (.OMEGA..cm) @ 25.degree. C. 72 94800 -- 106 208 83 24 -- --Resistivity (.OMEGA..cm) @ 90.degree. C. 127 18200 -- 153 178 104 43 -- --__________________________________________________________________________ -- = not evaluated
TABLE 8______________________________________Comparison of EPDM Cmnposition Perform ControlExample No. 1 7 B______________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 22.1 228.7 40.0DBP (cc/100 g) 132.5 119.5 111.7CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 25.3 27.8 44.3Tint (%) 33.0 42.3 64.6Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 289 252 144Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 459 348 186M-Ratio (Median/Mode Stokes) 1.59 1.38 1.29EPDM CompositionPerformance at 200 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 16300 22900 30700Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 2600 2790 3450Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.3) 1300 1348 1561Extrusion Rate (g/min) 37.0 47.1 44.7Extrusion Shrinkage 12.5 13.8 18.2t'90 (min) 8.23 10.5 7.45.DELTA.L (g.m) 238 308 293Hardness (Shore A) 79 76 82E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 662 540 650Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 1069 929 1103Elong. at Break (%) 243 232 184Rebound (%) 39 40.0 31.0Compression Set (%) 55 54 57(70 hrs, 150.degree. C.)Resistivity (.OMEGA..cm) @ 25.degree. C. 72 24 43Resistivity (.OMEGA..cm) @ 90.degree. C. 127 43 69______________________________________
These results set forth in Table 8 indicate that at a carbon black level of 200 phr the EPDM compositions incorporating the carbon blacks of the present invention have lower viscosity and lower mixing energy. Therefore the EPDM compositions incorporating the carbon blacks of the present invention exhibit better processing characteristics than the EPDM compositions incorporating the control carbon blacks.
TABLE 9______________________________________Comparison of EPDM Composition PerformanceExample No. 1 Control B______________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 22.1 40.0DBP (cc/100 g) 132.5 111.7CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 25.3 44.3Tint (%) 33.0 64.6Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 289 144Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 459 186M-Ratio (Median/Mode Stokes) 1.59 1.29EPDM CompositionPerformance at 150 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 12500 22200Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 1900 1940Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.3) 1010 1222Extrusion Rate (g/min) 39 37.4Extrusion Shrinkage (%) 17.2 19.8t'90 (min) 9.25 8.33.DELTA.L (g.m) 200 249Hardness (Shore A) 69 71E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 407 376Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 1145 1179Elong. at Break (%) 436 370Rebound (%) 46.1 35.8Compression Set (%) (70 hrs, 150.degree. C.) 57 57Resistivity (.OMEGA..cm) @ 25.degree. C. 400 88Resistivity (.OMEGA..cm) @ 90.degree. C. 640 118______________________________________
The results set forth in Table 9 show the advantage of utilizing a carbon black of the present invention in an EPDM composition for an application where resistivity is a critical requirement. As shown in the table, at 150 phr loading, which is typical for a cooling hose application, the EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention exhibits a higher resistivity than the EPDM composition incorporating the control carbon black.
Additionally, the EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention has lower viscosity and lower mixing energy than the EPDM composition incorporating the control carbon black. This indicates that EPDM compositions incorporating the carbon black of the present invention will have improved processibility in comparison with EPDM compositions incorporating the control carbon black.
TABLE 10______________________________________Comparison of EPDM Composition Performance.Example No. 6 Control D______________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 28.8 29.9DBP (cc/100 g) 64.5 68.5CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 28.7 30.1Tint (%) 45.7 51.6Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 212 256Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 312 288M-Ratio (Median/Mode Stokes) 1.47 1.12EPDM CompositionPerformance at 200 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 16000 16600Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 1790 1880Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.3) 1139 1091Extrusion Rate (g/min) 34.2 36.8Extrusion Shrinkage (%) 27.1 23.8t'90 (min) 10.2 11.2.DELTA.L (g.m) 247 270Hardness (Shore A) 67 69E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 299 338Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 977 989Elong. at Break (%) 397 421Rebound (%) 44.2 40.6Compression Set (%) (70 hrs, 150.degree. C.) 54 57______________________________________
The results set forth in Table 10 indicate that the compression set of the EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention is lower than the compression set of the EPDM composition incorporating the control carbon black. Thus an EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention is more resistant to permanent deformation. As a result the compositions will be particularly advantageous for use in sealing applications such as door seals and weather stripping.
TABLE 11______________________________________Comparison of EPDM Composition Performance Con-Example No. 2 9 trol C______________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 13.6 16.5 8.2DBP (cc/100 g) 37.1 30.0 37.5CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 17.3 18.3 9.9Tint (%) 33.4 31.1 21.7Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 246 242 416Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 390 310 492M-Ratio (Median/Mode Stokes) 1.58 1.29 1.18EPDM CompositionPerformance at 200 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 12100 9300 10400Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 1540 1310 1490Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.3) 918 687 799Extrusion Rate (g/min) 35.3 41.6 32.0Extrusion Shrinkage (%) 37.6 45.5 43.5t'90 (min) 11.8 13.7 13.2.DELTA.L (g.m) 234 230 220Hardness (Shore A) 57 50 53E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 184 112 109Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 779 740 933Elong. at Break (%) 592 724 794Rebound (%) 51.7 51.8 55.0Compression Set (%) (70 hrs, 150.degree. C.) 56 51 54______________________________________
The results set forth in Table 11 indicate that the carbon blacks of the present invention provide improved reinforcement and processing properties for EPDM compositions when compared to thermal carbon blacks. Thus the carbon blacks of the present invention advantageously provide furnace carbon black replacements for thermal carbon blacks or carbon black blends containing thermal carbon blacks.
TABLE 12__________________________________________________________________________Comparison of EPDM Composition PerformanceExample No. 3 4 5 Control C Control D__________________________________________________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 28.0 16.3 40.7 8.2 29.9DBP (cc/100 g) 35.8 84.6 43.1 37.5 68.5CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 29.8 18.7 45.1 9.9 30.1Tint (%) 54.7 32.5 85.6 21.7 51.6Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 212 276 176 416 256Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 300 492 240 492 288M-Ratio (Median/Mode Stokes) 1.42 1.78 1.36 1.18 1.12EPDM Composition Performance at 200 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 10900 18000 14100 10400 16600Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 1590 1920 1720 1490 1880Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.3) 876 1110 943 799 1091Extrusion Rate (g/min) 42.3 40.0 34.8 32.0 36.8Extrusion Shrinkage (%) 43.0 21.7 41.1 43.5 23.8t'90 (min) 11.9 9.7 9.6 13.2 11.2.DELTA.L (g.m) 206 272 271 220 270Hardness (Shore A) 65 69 65 53 69E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 175 392 192 109 338Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 974 925 1009 933 989Elong. at Break (%) 623 389 595 794 421Rebound (%) 43.7 47.4 34.2 55.0 40.6Compression Set (%) (70 hrs, 150.degree. C.) 50 2 65 54 57__________________________________________________________________________
The results set forth in Table 12 indicate that the carbon blacks of the present invention can replace the use of blends of thermal and SRF type carbon blacks to provide a satisfactory degree of performance characteristics. EPDM compositions incorporating the carbon black of Example 5 also yield profiles having textured matte finishes when extruded or shaped.
TABLE 13______________________________________Comparison of EPDM Composition Performance Con- Con-Example No. 8 trol A trol B______________________________________Carbon Black Analytical Properties:Iodine Number (mg/g) 57.9 35.4 40.0DBP (cc/100 g) 95.8 91.0 111.7CTAB (m.sup.2 /g) 53.1 35.9 44.3Tint (%) 74.2 57.8 64.6Mode Stokes Dia. (nm) 140 206 144Median Stokes Dia. (nm) 180 220 186M-Ratio (Median/Mode Stokes) 1.29 1.07 1.29EPDM CompositionPerformance at 200 phr:Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 10 sec.sup.-1 23700 24000 30700Viscosity (Pa.S) @ 150 sec.sup.-1 3130 2850 3450Mixing Energy (MJ/m.sup.3) 1581 1252 1561Extrusion Rate (g/min) 50.6 41.1 44.7Extrusion Shrinkage (%) 12.5 15.9 18.2t'90 (min) 9.9 7.41 7.45.DELTA.L (g.m) 218 299 293Hardness (Shore A) 79 75 82E100 (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 628 493 650Tensile (10.sup.4 .times. N/m.sup.2) 1268 1030 1103Elong. at Break (%) 237 298 184Rebound (%) 30.5 34.5 31.0Compression Set (%) (70 hrs, 150.degree. C.) 58 50 57______________________________________
The results set forth in Table 13 indicate that the EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention has a higher extrusion rate than the EPDM compositions incorporating the control carbon black. Thus, EPDM compositions incorporating the carbon blacks of the present invention may be extruded at higher throughputs than EPDM compositions incorporating the control carbon blacks.
The EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention also has a lower extrusion shrinkage and therefore will have better dimensional control during the extrusion operation than the EPDM compositions incorporating the control carbon blacks.
These results also indicate that the EPDM composition incorporating the carbon black of the present invention has good overall physical properties. Additionally, the carbon blacks of the present invention have a unique combination of surface area and structure that results in the carbon blacks being useful in preparing EPDM compositions that are to be UHF cured.
It should be clearly understood that the forms of the present invention herein described are illustrative only and are not intended to limit the scope of the invention.

Number	Name	Date
3787562	Heller et al.	Jan 1974
4221772	Eisenmenger et al.	Sep 1980
4500672	Suzuki et al.	Feb 1985
5190739	Mackay et al.	Mar 1993
5229452	Green et al.	Jul 1993

Number	Date	Country
61-47758	Mar 1986	JPX
1011905	Dec 1965	GBX

	Number	Date	Country
Parent	81881	Jun 1993
Parent	935794	Aug 1992

Carbon blacks

Information

Patent Number

Date Filed

Date Issued

Inventors

Original Assignees

Examiners

Agents

CPC

US Classifications

Field of Search

US

International Classifications

Abstract

Description

Claims

Parent Case Info

US Referenced Citations (5)

Foreign Referenced Citations (2)

Continuation in Parts (2)