The present invention is in the field of carbon dioxide recovery from flue gases. The process described incorporates a gravity fed co-current absorption column in combination with one or more serially arranged osmotic filters.
There is growing concern for the release of greenhouse gases into the atmosphere including in particular carbon dioxide because of its ability to trap heat. Technology exist for the recovery of carbon dioxide from flue gases; i.e. gases resulting from the combustion of coal, oil and/or natural gas, but to date the application of this know how has been limited. Focusing on the recovery of carbon dioxide while ignoring the questions of storage and disposal two approaches for carbon capture have been proposed. Carbon dioxide can either be recovered by absorption on a solid absorbent or dissolved in an aqueous solution. In the first instance, such solid materials can include carbon, small zeolites and metal organics. Absorption, however, presents challenges in that care must be taken to avoid attrition of the solid absorbent
The proposal for carbon capture in a solvent commonly involves an aqueous solution of amine. The amine of choice is monoethanolamine. While this solvent is sufficient in scrubbing flue gases, its regeneration is problematic because of the need for relatively high temperatures.
The present invention is a process for the recovery of carbon dioxide from flue gases of the type resulting from the combustion of coal, oil and/or natural gas and using a gravity fed co-current absorption column charged with an aqueous of salt and an amine to absorb carbon dioxide from the input flue gas. The column is followed by one or more osmotic filters in series from which the retentate is cycled back to the column input while the permeate is heated to strip out the carbon dioxide.
The present invention can best be appreciated by reviewing the relevant chemistry. Chemical reactions that occur are unique to the process. They indicate the principal advantages, namely, the efficiency of removing carbon dioxide from a gas stream and the ease with which the solvent can thereafter can be filtered and regenerated.
In the first step of the process when the gas stream is contacted with the aqueous solution the following chemical reactions take place:
NH3+CO2+H2O→NH4HCO3 1.
NH4HCO3+NaCl→NaHCO3+NH4Cl 2.
In the first equation ammonia reacts rapidly with carbon dioxide and water to provide ammonia bicarbonate. The second equation shows the rearrangement of ammonia bicarbonate with salt to give sodium bicarbonate and ammonia chloride. By combining these two reactions the following expression is obtained for the overall reaction in the absorption step.
NH3+CO2+H2O+NaCl→NaHCO3+NH4Cl 3.
The regeneration of the aqueous solution is shown by the following two equations.
2 NaHCO3→Na2CO3+H2O+CO2↑ 4.
Na2CO3+NH4Cl—>NaHCO3+NaCl+NH3 5.
The decomposition of sodium bicarbonate to give sodium carbonate and release carbon dioxide is indicated by equation 4. This reaction occurs under the application of heat. Finally, sodium carbonate, strongly alkaline in solution, reacts with ammonium chloride to form sodium bicarbonate, salt, and ammonia. When equations 4 and 5 are combined, the following equation is obtained showing the regeneration process.
NaHCO3+NH4Cl→→NH3+NaCl+H2O+CO2 6.
As one can see from this expression, the resulting solution containing ammonia and salt is identical to the solution used in scrubbing carbon dioxide shown in equation 3. Thus, the regenerated solution can be recycled to the absorption step.
The conditions of the process are important. The absorption step is conducted at atmospheric pressure or close to this level. The temperature for absorption is in the range of about 15° C. to approximately 50° C. Below this range, sodium bicarbonate begins to precipitate from solution causing fouling of the equipment. Above this range, carbon dioxide is released.
This regenerative step uses relatively mild conditions. The pressure of the process remains the same as in step one. The temperature is raised to a point in the range of 50 C. to 120° C., but a level below boiling is generally sufficient for the complete evolution of carbon dioxide.
Because of the limited solubility of sodium bicarbonate, sodium chloride in the scrubbing solution can be replaced by potassium chloride. The resulting chemistry is essentially the same.
Also, an amine can be substituted for ammonia in the process. For example, n-propylamine has a boiling point of 49° C. and is miscible in water. Recourse to the common solvent monoethanolamine is also possible.
In summary, the process of the present invention is directed toward the recovery of carbon dioxide from flue gases using a gravity fed co-current absorption column charged with an aqueous solution of salt and amine to absorb carbon dioxide from the input flue gas. The column is followed by one or more osmotic filters from which the retentate is cycled back to column input while the permeates are heated to 50° C. to 120° C. to strip out the carbon dioxide. The column recycles the solvent and operates at a temperature between about 15° C. and 50° C.
Half a cup of ammonia solution used by consumers as an “all-purpose cleaner” was added to half cup of sparkling carbonated water. After complete mixing, 1¼ teaspoons of salt were added to the solution and stirred vigorously. No bubbles appeared. Next, the solution was heated to temperatures describe above. Considerable foaming occurred shortly before the solution began to boil and released carbon dioxide.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 14/954,172 filed Nov. 30, 2015, and is also a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/600,043 filed May 19, 2017, which is a continuation-in-part of Ser. No. 14/798,827 filed Jul. 14, 2015 (now abandoned). The content of all related applications are incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1849844 | Joseph et al. | Mar 1932 | A |
2276192 | Hanford et al. | Mar 1942 | A |
3887689 | Carding et al. | Jun 1975 | A |
4364915 | Proctor | Dec 1982 | A |
4562174 | Stiles | Dec 1985 | A |
4825004 | Rutzen et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
4913842 | Yoneoka et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
5070016 | Hallberg | Dec 1991 | A |
5395991 | Scarlett et al. | Mar 1995 | A |
5449696 | Dandekar et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5453412 | Deckers et al. | Sep 1995 | A |
5663429 | Yamaseki et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
6114279 | Fukui et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
6140545 | Merger et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
6274108 | Fujii et al. | Aug 2001 | B1 |
6452058 | Schweizer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6486368 | Zhou et al. | Nov 2002 | B1 |
6632330 | Colley et al. | Oct 2003 | B1 |
7199276 | Sher et al. | Apr 2007 | B2 |
7214721 | Eastland | May 2007 | B2 |
7288689 | Janssen et al. | Oct 2007 | B2 |
7696390 | Stauffer | Apr 2010 | B2 |
7977272 | Miller et al. | Jul 2011 | B2 |
8323602 | Wright et al. | Dec 2012 | B2 |
8440868 | Stauffer | May 2013 | B2 |
8512460 | Moniwa et al. | Aug 2013 | B2 |
8545701 | Kelada | Oct 2013 | B2 |
8581010 | Stauffer | Nov 2013 | B2 |
8728423 | Iijima et al. | May 2014 | B2 |
8795415 | Katz et al. | Aug 2014 | B2 |
8961664 | Nakayama et al. | Feb 2015 | B2 |
9155991 | Ogawa et al. | Oct 2015 | B2 |
20070282018 | Jenkins et al. | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080269519 | Miller et al. | Oct 2008 | A1 |
20100086983 | Gellett et al. | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100196244 | Grauer et al. | Aug 2010 | A1 |
20110293968 | Leung et al. | Dec 2011 | A1 |
20120259145 | Stauffer | Oct 2012 | A1 |
20140199228 | Kniesburges | Jul 2014 | A1 |
20170080389 | Kelada | Mar 2017 | A1 |
20170206992 | Hong et al. | Jul 2017 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20180099248 A1 | Apr 2018 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 15600043 | May 2017 | US |
Child | 15835609 | US | |
Parent | 14798827 | Jul 2015 | US |
Child | 15600043 | US | |
Parent | 14954172 | Nov 2015 | US |
Child | 14798827 | US |