Patent Grant
11459578
The instant application contains a Sequence Listing which has been submitted electronically in ASCII format and is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety. Said ASCII copy, created on Apr. 5, 2017, is named 040517_NMC0001-101-US_Sequence_Listing_ST25.txt and is 286 KB in size.
Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
A major factor limiting photosynthetic efficiency is the competitive inhibition of CO2 fixation by oxygen, due to lack of specificity of the enzyme RuBisCO. Incorporation of oxygen by RuBisCO is the first-dedicated step in photorespiration, a pathway that respires CO2, compounding photosynthetic inefficiency. Overall, photorespiration reduces photosynthetic productivity by as much as 50% [1]. To date, attempts to engineer reduced oxygenase activity in RuBisCO have been largely unsuccessful.
Significantly, the cyanobacteria, eukaryotic microalgae, and C4 plants have evolved mechanisms to reduce photorespiration by concentrating CO2 near RuBisCO, competitively inhibiting oxygenase activity and leading to substantial increases in yield and water use efficiency per unit carbon fixed. However, carbon concentrating systems (CCMs) are not operational in the vast majority of plant species (i.e., C3 plants).
Attempts to reconstitute functional CCMs in C3 plants have been previously attempted by us and others, mainly focusing on engineering pathways that are directly involved in facilitating CO2 transport into leaf chloroplasts. Note, for example, PCT International Publication WO 2012/125737; Sage and Sage (2009) Plant and Cell Physiol. 50(4):756-772; Zhu et al. (2010) J Interg. Plant Biol. 52(8):762-770; Furbank et al. (2009) Funct. Plant Biol. 36(11):845-856; Weber and von Caemmerer (2010) Curr. Opin. Plant Biol.; Price (2013) J. Exp. Bot. 64(3):753-68; and U.S. Patent Application Publication No. 2013/0007916 A1.
However, ATP and NADPH production through light harvesting and electron transfer steps must be coordinated with carbon assimilation and additional energy requiring steps including CCM systems to prevent photoinhibition and to improve growth. Additionally, assimilatory flux and storage rates can limit carbon fixation due to feedback inhibition when sink demand is not matched to source capacity [2].
Thus, there is a critical need to improve plant productivity through integrated systems engineering approaches that balance source/sink interactions with energy and reductant production to develop energy-requiring, artificial CCMs that can effectively mimic those found in nature.
Accordingly, in response to this need, the present disclosure provides methods for elevating cyclic electron transfer activity, improving carbon concentration, and enhancing carbon fixation in C3 and C4 plants, and algae, and producing biomass or other products from C3 or C4 plants, and algae, selected from among, for example, starches, oils, fatty acids, lipids, cellulose or other carbohydrates, alcohols, sugars, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, fragrance and flavoring compounds, and organic acids, as well as transgenic plants produced thereby. These methods and transgenic plants and algae encompass the expression, or overexpression, of various combinations of genes that improve carbon concentrating systems in plants and algae, such as bicarbonate transport proteins, carbonic anhydrase, light driven proton pump, cyclic electron flow regulators, etc. Thus, among its various embodiments, the present disclosure provides the following:
A first embodiment of the present invention provides for a transgenic plant or alga, comprising within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane and a cyclic electron transfer modulator protein. The cyclic electron transfer modulator protein may be selected from a PGRL1 protein (for example SEQ ID NO:3), a PGR5 protein (for example SEQ ID NO:1), a leaf FNR1 protein (for example SEQ ID NO:96), a leaf FNR2 protein (for example SEQ ID NO:97), a Fd1 protein (for example SEQ ID NO:95), or any combination thereof and for example the ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane may be a HLA3 protein (for example SEQ ID NO:77). The transgenic plant or alga described may further comprise within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing the heterologous nucleotide sequence encoding a bicarbonate anion transporter protein localized to the chloroplast envelope. The transgenic plant or alga described herein may further comprise within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing the heterologous nucleotide sequence a carbonic anhydrase protein. In a preferred embodiment, the cyclic electron transfer modulator protein is a PGR5 protein, in another preferred embodiment the cyclic electron transfer modulator protein is Fd1 protein, in yet another preferred embodiment, in still another preferred embodiment the cyclic electron transfer modulator protein is leaf FNR1, in a further preferred embodiment the cyclic electron transfer modulator protein is PGRL1. In a preferred embodiment the heterologous nucleotide sequences of the transgenic plant or alga encode i) a PGR5 protein, and a HLA3 protein; or ii) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein and a PGRL1 protein or a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, and a LCIA protein or a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a PGRL1 protein, a LCIA protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein. In another preferred embodiment the heterologous nucleotide sequences the transgenic plant or alga of wherein encode a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a LCIA protein and a BCA or optionally a HCA2 protein. The transgenic plant or alga as described wherein the PGR5 protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:1; the HLA3 protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:77; the PGRL1 protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:3; the LCIA protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:18; and/or the BCA protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:21. Alternatively, the sequence identity/sequence similarity is about 75%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 100% to those specifically disclosed which includes for example proteins without a transit peptide sequence and the functional protein.
A second embodiment provides for a transgenic plant or alga, comprising within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding:
LCIA protein and BCA protein or HCA protein is provided. In a preferred embodiment the heterologous nucleotide sequences encode transgenic plant or alga wherein the LCIA protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:18; and/or the BCA protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:21 and the HCA protein has an amino acid sequence at least 80% identical to SEQ ID NO:19. Alternatively, the sequence identity/sequence similarity is about 75%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 100% to those specifically disclosed which include for example proteins without a transit peptide sequence and the functional protein.
A third embodiment provides for a transgenic plant or alga, comprising within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane (for example SEQ ID NO:77), a bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the chloroplast envelope (for example SEQ ID NO:18), a carbonic anhydrase, a proteorhodopsin protein targeted to thylakoid membranes (for example SEQ ID NO:98), and a ß carotene monooxygenase protein (for example SEQ ID NO:100). In another preferred embodiment the proteorhodopsin comprises a chloroplast transit peptide selected from among a psbX stop-transfer trans-membrane domain fused to its C-terminus, a DNAJ transit peptide, a CAB transit peptide, a PGR5 transit peptide, and a psaD transit peptide. In another preferred embodiment the β-carotene monooxygenase is expressed under the control of a promoter selected from among an ethanol inducible gene promoter and a green tissue/leaf-specific promoter selected from among CAB and rbcS. The proteorhodopsin may comprise an amino acid substitution selected from among L219E/T206S, M79T, and M79Y, and combinations thereof.
The carbonic anhydrase of the first, second, or third embodiment may be a BCA or optionally a HCA2 protein. The bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the chloroplast envelope of the first, second and third embodiment may be a LCIA protein. The ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane of the first and third embodiments may be HLA3.
A fourth embodiment provides for a method of making a transgenic plant or alga of a first embodiment wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane and a cyclic electron transfer modulator protein. The cyclic electron transfer modulator protein may be selected from a PGRL1 protein, a PGR5 protein, a FNR1 protein, a FNR2 protein (leaf-form isotopes), a Fd1 protein, or any combination thereof and wherein the ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane is a HLA3 protein. The heterologous nucleotide sequences of the fourth embodiment further encoding a bicarbonate anion transporter protein localized to the chloroplast envelope for example the bicarbonate anion transporter protein is LCIA. Additionally, the heterologous nucleotide sequences encode a carbonic anhydrase protein for example a BCA protein or optionally a HCA2 protein. In a preferred embodiment the cyclic electron transfer modulator protein is a PGR5 protein and optionally a PGRL1 protein and or combination thereof.
A fifth embodiment provides a method of making a transgenic plant or alga as described in a second embodiment, wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding a LCIA protein and a BCA protein or optionally a HCA protein.
A sixth embodiment provides a method of making a transgenic plant or alga of a third embodiment wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane, a bicarbonate anion transporter, a carbonic anhydrase, a proteorhodopsin protein targeted to thylakoid membranes, and a R carotene monooxygenase protein. In a preferred embodiment the proteorhodopsin comprises a chloroplast transit peptide selected from among a psbX stop-transfer trans-membrane domain fused to its C-terminus, a DNAJ transit peptide, a CAB transit peptide, a PGR5 transit peptide, and a psaD transit peptide. In another preferred embodiment the β-carotene monooxygenase is expressed under the control of a promoter selected from among an ethanol inducible gene promoter and a green tissue/leaf-specific promoter selected from among CAB and rbcS. In a preferred embodiment the proteorhodopsin comprises an amino acid substitution selected from among L219E/T206S, M79T, and M79Y, and combinations thereof. In another preferred embodiment the ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane is HLA3.
The transgenic plant of an embodiment disclosed herein may be a C3 plant or a C4 plant such as a transgenic oilseed plant or a transgenic food crop plant which may include the genera Brassica (e.g., rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus; Brassica carinata; Brassica nigra; Brassica oleracea), Camelina, Miscanthus, and Jatropha; Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), coconut; cotton; peanut; rice; safflower; sesame; soybean; mustard other than Arabidopsis; wheat; flax (linseed); sunflower; olive; corn; palm; palm kernel; sugarcane; castor bean; switchgrass; Borago officinalis; Echium plantagineum; Cuphea hookeriana; Cuphea pulcherrima; Cuphea lanceolata; Ricinus communis; Coriandrum sativum; Crepis alpina; Vernonia galamensis; Momordica charantia; and Crambe abyssinica, wheat, rice, maize (corn), barley, oats, sorghum, rye, and millet; peanuts, chickpeas, lentils, kidney beans, soybeans, lima beans; potatoes, sweet potatoes, and cassavas; soybeans, corn, canola, peanuts, palm, coconuts, safflower, cottonseed, sunflower, flax, olive, and safflower; sugar cane and sugar beets; bananas, oranges, apples, pears, breadfruit, pineapples, and cherries; tomatoes, lettuce, carrots, melons, strawberry, asparagus, broccoli, peas, kale, cashews, peanuts, walnuts, pistachio nuts, almonds; forage and turf grasses; alfalfa, clover; coffee, cocoa, kola nut, poppy; vanilla, sage, thyme, anise, saffron, menthol, peppermint, spearmint and coriander and preferably wheat, rice and canola. The transgenic alga of an embodiment disclosed herein may be selected from among a Chlorella species, a Nannochloropsis species, and a Chlamydomonas species. The heterologous nucleotide sequences are described in an embodiment may be codon-optimized for expression in said transgenic plant or alga. One aspect of the present invention provides for a transgenic plant or alga as described in an embodiment which exhibits enhanced CO2 fixation compared to an otherwise identical control plant grown under the same conditions for example wherein CO2 fixation is enhanced in the range of from about 10% to about 50% compared to that of an otherwise identical control plant grown under the same conditions.
A fourth embodiment provides for a part of said transgenic plant or alga of any embodiment described herein. For example, the part of said transgenic plant may be selected from among a protoplast, a cell, a tissue, an organ, a cutting, an explant, a reproductive tissue, a vegetative tissue, biomass, an inflorescence, a flower, a sepal, a petal, a pistil, a stigma, a style, an ovary, an ovule, an embryo, a receptacle, a seed, a fruit, a stamen, a filament, an anther, a male or female gametophyte, a pollen grain, a meristem, a terminal bud, an axillary bud, a leaf, a stem, a root, a tuberous root, a rhizome, a tuber, a stolon, a corm, a bulb, an offset, a cell of said plant in culture, a tissue of said plant in culture, an organ of said plant in culture, a callus, propagation materials, germplasm, cuttings, divisions, and propagations.
A fifth embodiment provides for a progeny or derivative of said transgenic plant or alga of any embodiment described herein. For example, the progeny or derivatives may be selected from among clones, hybrids, samples, seeds, and harvested material thereof and may be produced sexually or asexually.
Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of elevating CET activity in a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane and cyclic electron transfer modulator protein.
Yet another embodiment provides a method of enhancing carbon fixation in a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane and a cyclic electron transfer modulator protein.
Yet another method provides for a method of producing biomass or other products from a C3 plant, C4 plant, or an alga, wherein said products are selected from among starches, oils, fatty acids, triacylglycerols, lipids, cellulose or other carbohydrates, alcohols, sugars, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, fragrance and flavoring compounds, and organic acids wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane and a cyclic electron transfer modulator protein. This method further comprises growing said plant or alga and harvesting said biomass or recovering said product from said plant or alga. Another aspect of the present invention provides for biomass or other product produced from a plant or alga selected from among starches, oils, fatty acids, lipids, cellulose or other carbohydrates, alcohols, sugars, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, fragrance and flavoring compounds, and organic acids, made by a method of any one of the method of making a transgenic plant or alga embodiments herein.
Another embodiment provides a method of elevating cyclic electron transfer (CET) activity in a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane, a bicarbonate anion transporter, a carbonic anhydrase, a proteorhodopsin protein targeted to thylakoid membranes; and a R carotene monooxygenase protein.
Another embodiment provides a method of enhancing carbon fixation in a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane, a bicarbonate anion transporter, a carbonic anhydrase, a proteorhodopsin protein targeted to thylakoid membranes; and a R carotene monooxygenase protein.
Another embodiment provides for a method of producing biomass or other products from a C3 plant, C4 plant, or an alga, wherein said products are selected from among starches, oils, fatty acids, triacylglycerols, lipids, cellulose or other carbohydrates, alcohols, sugars, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, fragrance and flavoring compounds, and organic acids wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding an ATP dependent bicarbonate anion transporter localized to the plasma membrane, a bicarbonate anion transporter, a carbonic anhydrase, a proteorhodopsin protein targeted to thylakoid membranes; and a R carotene monooxygenase protein. The method further comprises growing said plant or alga and harvesting said biomass or recovering said product from said plant or alga.
Another embodiment provides for use of a construct comprising one or more nucleic acids encoding
a) a PGR5 protein, and a HLA3 protein;
b) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein and a PGRL1 protein;
c) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, and a LCIA protein;
d) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a LCIA protein and a BCA or HCA2 protein;
e) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a PGRL1 protein and a LCIA protein;
f) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a PGRL1 protein, a LCIA protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein;
g) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein; or
h) a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a PGRL1 protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein for
Another embodiment provides for use of a construct comprising one or more nucleic acids encoding
a) a LCIA protein and a BCA or HCA2 protein;
for
One aspect of the present invention provides for a transgenic plant or alga, comprising within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding:
1. i) a PGRL1 protein, a PGR5 protein, and a HLA3 protein; or
2. The transgenic plant or alga of 1, wherein said proteorhodopsin comprises a chloroplast transit peptide selected from among a psbX stop-transfer trans-membrane domain fused to its C-terminus, a DNAJ transit peptide, a CAB transit peptide, a PGR5 transit peptide, and a psaD transit peptide.
3. The transgenic plant or alga of 1 or 2, wherein said β-carotene monooxygenase is expressed under the control of a promoter selected from among an ethanol inducible gene promoter and a green tissue/leaf-specific promoter selected from among CAB and rbcS.
4. The transgenic plant or alga of any one of 1-3, wherein said proteorhodopsin comprises an amino acid substitution selected from among L219E/T206S, M79T, and M79Y, and combinations thereof.
5. The transgenic plant of any one of 1-4, which is a C3 plant or a C4 plant.
6. The transgenic plant of any one of 1-5, which is a transgenic oilseed plant or a transgenic food crop plant.
7. The transgenic oilseed plant of 6, which is selected from among plants of the genera Brassica (e.g., rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus; Brassica carinata; Brassica nigra; Brassica oleracea), Camelina, Miscanthus, and Jatropha; Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), coconut; cotton; peanut; rice; safflower; sesame; soybean; mustard other than Arabidopsis; wheat; flax (linseed); sunflower; olive; corn; palm; palm kernel; sugarcane; castor bean; switchgrass; Borago officinalis; Echium plantagineum; Cuphea hookeriana; Cuphea pulcherrima; Cuphea lanceolata; Ricinus communis; Coriandrum sativum; Crepis alpina; Vernonia galamensis; Momordica charantia; and Crambe abyssinica.
8. The transgenic alga of any one of 1-5, which is selected from among Chlorella sp., Nannochloropsis sp., and Chlamydomonas sp.
9. The transgenic plant or alga of any one of 1-8, wherein said heterologous nucleotide sequences are codon-optimized for expression in said transgenic plant or alga.
10. The transgenic plant or alga of any one of 1-9, which exhibits enhanced CO2 fixation compared to an otherwise identical control plant grown under the same conditions.
11. The transgenic plant or alga of 10, wherein CO2 fixation is enhanced in the range of from about 10% to about 50% compared to that of an otherwise identical control plant grown under the same conditions.
12. A part of said transgenic plant or alga of any one of 1-11.
13. The part of said transgenic plant of 12, which is selected from among a protoplast, a cell, a tissue, an organ, a cutting, an explant, a reproductive tissue, a vegetative tissue, biomass, an inflorescence, a flower, a sepal, a petal, a pistil, a stigma, a style, an ovary, an ovule, an embryo, a receptacle, a seed, a fruit, a stamen, a filament, an anther, a male or female gametophyte, a pollen grain, a meristem, a terminal bud, an axillary bud, a leaf, a stem, a root, a tuberous root, a rhizome, a tuber, a stolon, a corm, a bulb, an offset, a cell of said plant in culture, a tissue of said plant in culture, an organ of said plant in culture, a callus, propagation materials, germplasm, cuttings, divisions, and propagations.
14. Progeny or derivatives of said transgenic plant or alga of any one of 1-11.
15. The progeny or derivatives of 14, which is selected from among clones, hybrids, samples, seeds, and harvested material thereof.
16. The progeny of 14 or 15, which is produced sexually.
17. The progeny of 14 or 15, which is produced asexually.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a method selected from among:
18. i) making a transgenic plant or alga of any one of 1-11;
ii) elevating CET activity in a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga;
iii) enhancing carbon fixation in a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga; and
iv) producing biomass or other products from a C3 plant, C4 plant, or alga, wherein said products are selected from among starches, oils, fatty acids, triacylglycerols, lipids, cellulose or other carbohydrates, alcohols, sugars, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, fragrance and flavoring compounds, and organic acids,
wherein said method comprises expressing, or overexpressing, in a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding:
a) a PGRL1 protein, a PGR5 protein, and a HLA3 protein; or
b) a PGRL1 protein, a PGR5 protein, a HLA3 protein, a LCIA protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein; or
c) a Fd1 protein, a HLA3 protein, a LCIA protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein; or
d) a leaf FNR1 protein, a HLA3 protein, a LCIA protein, and a BCA or HCA2 protein;
or
19. The method of 18, wherein step iv) further comprises growing said plant or alga and harvesting said biomass or recovering said product from said plant or alga.
20. The method of 18 or 19, wherein said proteorhodopsin comprises a chloroplast transit peptide selected from among a psbX stop-transfer trans-membrane domain fused to its C-terminus, a DNAJ transit peptide, a CAB transit peptide, a PGR5 transit peptide, and a psaD transit peptide.
21. The method of any one of 18-20, wherein said β-carotene monooxygenase is expressed under the control of a promoter selected from among an ethanol inducible gene promoter and a green tissue/leaf-specific promoter selected from among CAB and rbcS.
22. The method of any one of 18-21, wherein said proteorhodopsin comprises an amino acid substitution selected from among L219E/T206S, M79T, and M79Y, and combinations thereof.
23. The method of any one of 18-22, wherein said transgenic plant is a C3 plant, a C4 plant, or an alga.
24. The method of any one of 18-23, wherein said transgenic plant is a transgenic oilseed plant or a transgenic food crop plant.
25. The method of 24, wherein said transgenic oilseed plant is selected from among plants of the genera Brassica (e.g., rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus; Brassica carinata; Brassica nigra; Brassica oleracea), Camelina, Miscanthus, and Jatropha; Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), coconut; cotton; peanut; rice; safflower; sesame; soybean; mustard other than Arabidopsis; wheat; flax (linseed); sunflower; olive; corn; palm; palm kernel; sugarcane; castor bean; switchgrass; Borago officinalis; Echium plantagineum; Cuphea hookeriana; Cuphea pulcherrima; Cuphea lanceolata; Ricinus communis; Coriandrum sativum; Crepis alpina; Vernonia galamensis; Momordica charantia; and Crambe abyssinica.
26. The method of any one of 18-23, wherein said alga is selected from among Chlorella sp., Nannochloropsis sp., and Chlamydomonas sp.
27. The method of any one of 18-26, wherein said heterologous nucleotide sequences are codon-optimized for expression in said transgenic plant or alga.
28. The method of any one of 18-27, wherein said transgenic plant or alga exhibits enhanced CO2 fixation compared to an otherwise identical control plant or alga grown under the same conditions.
29. The method of 28, wherein CO2 fixation is enhanced in the range of from about 10% to about 50% compared to that of an otherwise identical control plant or alga grown under the same conditions.
Another aspect of the present invention provides for a transgenic plant or alga made by the method of any one of 18-29.
Yet another aspect of the present invention provides for a biomass or other product from a plant or alga, selected from among starches, oils, fatty acids, lipids, cellulose or other carbohydrates, alcohols, sugars, nutraceuticals, pharmaceuticals, fragrance and flavoring compounds, and organic acids, made by the method of any one of 18-29.
In addition to the various embodiments listed above, in the Examples below, and in the claims, this disclosure further variously encompasses the presently disclosed and claimed CCM protein combinations in further combinations with the genes and proteins focusing on engineering pathways that are directly involved in facilitating CO2 transport into leaf chloroplasts, disclosed and claimed in the inventors' previous application PCT International Publication WO 2012/125737. The present disclosure encompasses any combination of genes disclosed herein with any combination of genes disclosed in WO 2012/125737 and in Tables D1-D9 to improve carbon concentrating systems (CCMs) in plants and algae.
Table D1 represents different classes of α-CAs found in mammals.
Table D2-D4 represents representative species, Gene bank accession numbers, and amino acid sequences for various species of suitable CA genes.
Table D5 represents the codon optimized DNA sequence for chloroplast expression in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii. In Table D5, the underlines sequences represent restriction sites, and bases changed to optimize chloroplast expression are listed in lower case. Table D6 provides a breakdown of the number and type of each codon optimized.
Representative species and Gene bank accession numbers for various species of bicarbonate transporter are listed below in Tables D8-D9.
Further scope of the applicability of the presently disclosed embodiments will become apparent from the detailed description and drawing(s) provided below. However, it should be understood that the detailed description and specific examples, while indicating preferred embodiments of this disclosure, are given by way of illustration only since various changes and modifications within the spirit and scope of these embodiments will become apparent to those skilled in the art from this detailed description.
The disclosure can be more fully understood form the following detailed description and the accompanying Sequence Listing, which form a part of this application.
The sequence descriptions summarize the Sequence Listing attached hereto. The Sequence Listing contains standard symbols and format used for nucleotide and amino acid sequence data comply with the rules set forth in 37 C.F.R. § 1.822.
The above and other aspects, features, and advantages of the present disclosure will be better understood from the following detailed descriptions taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawing(s), all of which are given by way of illustration only, and are not limitative of the presently disclosed embodiments, in which:
The following detailed description is provided to aid those skilled in the art in practicing the various embodiments of the present disclosure described herein, including all the methods, uses, compositions, etc., described herein. Even so, the following detailed description should not be construed to unduly limit the present disclosure, as modifications and variations in the embodiments herein discussed may be made by those of ordinary skill in the art without departing from the spirit or scope of the present discoveries.
The present disclosure is explained in greater detail below. This disclosure is not intended to be a detailed catalog of all the different ways in which embodiments of this disclosure can be implemented, or all the features that can be added to the instant embodiments. For example, features illustrated with respect to one embodiment may be incorporated into other embodiments, and features illustrated with respect to a particular embodiment may be deleted from that embodiment. In addition, numerous variations and additions to the various embodiments suggested herein will be apparent to those skilled in the art in light of the instant disclosure, which variations and additions do not depart from the scope of the instant disclosure. Hence, the following specification is intended to illustrate some particular embodiments of the disclosure, and not to exhaustively specify all permutations, combinations, and variations thereof.
Any feature, or combination of features, described herein is(are) included within the scope of the present disclosure, provided that the features included in any such combination are not mutually inconsistent as will be apparent from the context, this specification, and the knowledge of one of ordinary skill in the art. Additional advantages and aspects of the present disclosure are apparent in the following detailed description and claims.
The contents of all publications, patent applications, patents, and other references mentioned herein are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety. In case of conflict, the present specification, including explanations of terms, will control.
The following definitions are provided to aid the reader in understanding the various aspects of the present disclosure. Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by those of ordinary skill in the art to which the disclosure pertains.
As used herein and in the appended claims, the singular forms “a”, “an”, and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Thus, for example, reference to “a plant” includes a plurality of such plants, reference to “a cell” includes one or more cells and equivalents thereof known to those skilled in the art, and so forth. Similarly, the word “or” is intended to include “and” unless the context clearly indicates otherwise. Hence “comprising A or B” means including A, or B, or A and B. Furthermore, the use of the term “including”, as well as other related forms, such as “includes” and “included”, is not limiting.
The term “about” as used herein is a flexible word with a meaning similar to “approximately” or “nearly”. The term “about” indicates that exactitude is not claimed, but rather a contemplated variation. Thus, as used herein, the term “about” means within 1 or 2 standard deviations from the specifically recited value, or ±a range of up to 20%, up to 15%, up to 10%, up to 5%, or up to 4%, 3%, 2%, or 1% compared to the specifically recited value.
The term “comprising” as used in a claim herein is open-ended, and means that the claim must have all the features specifically recited therein, but that there is no bar on additional features that are not recited being present as well. The term “comprising” leaves the claim open for the inclusion of unspecified ingredients even in major amounts. The term “consisting essentially of” in a claim means that the invention necessarily includes the listed ingredients, and is open to unlisted ingredients that do not materially affect the basic and novel properties of the invention. A “consisting essentially of” claim occupies a middle ground between closed claims that are written in a closed “consisting of” format and fully open claims that are drafted in a “comprising’ format”. These terms can be used interchangeably herein if, and when, this may become necessary. Furthermore, the use of the term “including”, as well as other related forms, such as “includes” and “included”, is not limiting.
“BCA” refers to bacterial carbonic anhydrase.
“CCMs” and the like refer to carbon concentrating systems.
“CET” refers to cyclic electron transfer.
“LET” refers to linear electron transfer.
“WT” refers to wild-type.
“Cyclic electron transfer modulator protein” refers to any protein natural or synthetic that improves the separation of charge across the thylakoid membrane resulting in improved photophosphorylation with the production of chemical energy. Examples of such modulators are the PGR5 and PRGL1 reductases, however improved proteins in the electron transport chain such as cytochromes, ATPases, ferredoxin-NADP reductase, NAD(P)H-plastoquinone reductase, and the like are also CET modulator proteins.
Unless otherwise stated, nucleic acid sequences in the text of this specification are given, when read from left to right, in the 5′ to 3′ direction. Nucleic acid sequences may be provided as DNA or as RNA, as specified; disclosure of one necessarily defines the other, as is known to one of ordinary skill in the art and is understood as included in embodiments where it would be appropriate. Nucleotides may be referred to by their commonly accepted single-letter codes. Unless otherwise indicated, amino acid sequences are written left to right in amino to carboxyl orientation, respectively. Amino acids may be referred to herein by either their commonly known three letter symbols or by the one-letter symbols recommended by the IUPAC-IUM Biochemical Nomenclature Commission. It is further to be understood that all base sizes or amino acid sizes, and all molecular weight or molecular mass values, given for nucleic acids or polypeptides are approximate, and are provided for description purposes and are not to be unduly limiting.
Regarding disclosed ranges, the endpoints of all ranges directed to the same component or property are inclusive and independently combinable (e.g., ranges of “up to about 25 wt. %, or, more specifically, about 5 wt. % to about 20 wt. %,” is inclusive of the endpoints and all intermediate values of the ranges of “about 5 wt. % to about 25 wt. %,” etc.). Numeric ranges recited with the specification are inclusive of the numbers defining the range and include each integer within the defined range.
As used herein, “altering level of production” or “altering level of expression” means changing, either by increasing or decreasing, the level of production or expression of a nucleic acid sequence or an amino acid sequence (for example a polypeptide, an siRNA, a miRNA, an mRNA, a gene), as compared to a control level of production or expression.
“Conservative amino acid substitutions”: It is well known that certain amino acids can be substituted for other amino acids in a protein structure without appreciable loss of biochemical or biological activity. Since it is the interactive capacity and nature of a protein that defines that protein's biological functional activity, certain amino acid sequence substitutions can be made in a protein sequence, and, of course, its underlying DNA coding sequence, and nevertheless obtain a protein with like properties. Thus, various changes can be made in the amino acid sequences disclosed herein, or in the corresponding DNA sequences that encode these amino acid sequences, without appreciable loss of their biological utility or activity.
Proteins and peptides biologically functionally equivalent to the proteins and peptides disclosed herein include amino acid sequences containing conservative amino acid changes in the fundamental amino acid sequence. In such amino acid sequences, one or more amino acids in the fundamental sequence can be substituted, for example, with another amino acid(s), the charge and polarity of which is similar to that of the native amino acid, i.e., a conservative amino acid substitution, resulting in a silent change.
It should be noted that there are a number of different classification systems in the art that have been developed to describe the interchangeability of amino acids for one another within peptides, polypeptides, and proteins. The following discussion is merely illustrative of some of these systems, and the present disclosure encompasses any of the “conservative” amino acid changes that would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art of peptide, polypeptide, and protein chemistry from any of these different systems.
As disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,599,686, certain amino acids in a biologically active peptide, polypeptide, or protein can be replaced by other homologous, isosteric, and/or isoelectronic amino acids, wherein the biological activity of the original molecule is conserved in the modified peptide, polypeptide, or protein. The following list of amino acid replacements is meant to be illustrative and is not limiting:
In another system, substitutes for an amino acid within a fundamental sequence can be selected from other members of the class to which the naturally occurring amino acid belongs. Amino acids can be divided into the following four groups: (1) acidic amino acids; (2) basic amino acids; (3) neutral polar amino acids; and (4) neutral non-polar amino acids. Representative amino acids within these various groups include, but are not limited to: (1) acidic (negatively charged) amino acids such as aspartic acid and glutamic acid; (2) basic (positively charged) amino acids such as arginine, histidine, and lysine; (3) neutral polar amino acids such as glycine, serine, threonine, cysteine, cystine, tyrosine, asparagine. and glutamine; (4) neutral nonpolar (hydrophobic) amino acids such as alanine, leucine, isoleucine, valine, proline, phenylalanine, tryptophan, and methionine.
Conservative amino acid changes within a fundamental peptide, polypeptide, or protein sequence can be made by substituting one amino acid within one of these groups with another amino acid within the same group.
Some of the other systems for classifying conservative amino acid interchangeability in peptides, polypeptides, and proteins applicable to the sequences of the present disclosure include, for example, the following:
Functionally defining common properties between individual amino acids by analyzing the normalized frequencies of amino acid changes between corresponding proteins of homologous organisms (Schulz, G. E. and R. H. Schirmer (1979) Principles of Protein Structure (Springer Advanced Texts in Chemistry), Springer-Verlag). According to such analyses, groups of amino acids can be defined where amino acids within a group exchange preferentially with each other, and therefore resemble each other most in their impact on overall protein structure;
Making amino acid changes based on the hydropathic index of amino acids as described by Kyte and Doolittle (1982) J. Mol. Biol. 157(1):105-32. Certain amino acids can be substituted by other amino acids having a similar hydropathic index or score and still result in a protein with similar biological activity, i.e., still obtain a biological functionally equivalent protein. In making such changes, the substitution of amino acids whose hydropathic indices are within +2 is preferred, those that are within +1 are particularly preferred, and those within +0.5 are even more particularly preferred;
Substitution of like amino acids on the basis of hydrophilicity. U.S. Pat. No. 4,554,101 states that the greatest local average hydrophilicity of a protein, as governed by the hydrophilicity of its adjacent amino acids, correlates with a biological property of the protein. As detailed in this patent, the following hydrophilicity values have been assigned to amino acid residues: arginine (+3.0); lysine (+3.0); aspartate (+3.0.+0.1); glutamate (+3.0.+0.1); serine (+0.3); asparagine (+0.2); glutamine (+0.2); glycine (0); threonine (−0.4); proline (−0.5.+0.1); alanine (−0.5); histidine (−0.5); cysteine (−1.0); methionine (−1.3); valine (−1.5); leucine (−1.8); isoleucine (−1.8); tyrosine (−2.3); phenylalanine (−2.5); tryptophan (−3.4). Betts and Russell ((2003), “Amino Acid Properties and Consequences of Substitutions”, Bioinformatics for Geneticists, Michael R. Barnes and Ian C. Gray, Eds., John Wiley & Sons, Ltd, Chapter 14, pp. 289-316) review the nature of mutations and the properties of amino acids in a variety of different protein contexts with the purpose of aiding in anticipating and interpreting the effect that a particular amino acid change will have on protein structure and function. The authors point out that features of proteins relevant to considering amino acid mutations include cellular environments, three-dimensional structure, and evolution, as well as the classifications of amino acids based on evolutionary, chemical, and structural principles, and the role for amino acids of different classes in protein structure and function in different contexts. The authors note that classification of amino acids into categories such as those shown in
Biologically/enzymatically functional equivalents of the proteins and peptides disclosed herein can have 10 or fewer conservative amino acid changes, more preferably seven or fewer conservative amino acid changes, and most preferably five or fewer conservative amino acid changes, i.e., 10, 9, 8, 7, 6, 5, 4, 3, 2, or 1 conservative amino acid changes. The encoding nucleotide sequence (e.g., gene, plasmid DNA, cDNA, codon-optimized DNA, or other synthetic DNA) will thus have corresponding base substitutions, permitting it to code for the biologically functionally equivalent form of protein or peptide. Due to the degeneracy of the genetic code, i.e., the existence of more than one codon for most of the amino acids naturally occurring in proteins, other DNA (and RNA) sequences that contain essentially the same genetic information as these nucleic acids, and which encode the same amino acid sequence as that encoded by these nucleic acids, can be used in the methods disclosed herein. This principle applies as well to any of the other nucleotide sequences disclosed herein.
“Control” or “control level” means the level of a molecule, such as a polypeptide or nucleic acid, normally found in nature under a certain condition and/or in a specific genetic background. In certain embodiments, a control level of a molecule can be measured in a cell or specimen that has not been subjected, either directly or indirectly, to a treatment. A control level is also referred to as a wildtype or a basal level. These terms are understood by those of ordinary skill in the art. A control plant, i.e. a plant that does not contain a recombinant DNA that confers (for instance) an enhanced trait in a transgenic plant, is used as a baseline for comparison to identify an enhanced trait in the transgenic plant. A suitable control plant may be a non-transgenic plant of the parental line used to generate a transgenic plant. A control plant may in some cases be a transgenic plant line that comprises an empty vector or marker gene, but does not contain the recombinant DNA, or does not contain all of the recombinant DNAs, in the test plant.
The terms “enhance”, “enhanced”, “increase”, or “increased” refer to a statistically significant increase. For the avoidance of doubt, these terms generally refer to about a 5% increase in a given parameter or value, about a 10% increase, about a 15% increase, about a 20% increase, about a 25% increase, about a 30% increase, about a 35% increase, about a 40% increase, about a 45% increase, about a 50% increase, about a 55% increase, about a 60% increase, about a 65% increase, about 70% increase, about a 75% increase, about an 80% increase, about an 85% increase, about a 90% increase, about a 95% increase, about a 100% increase, or more over the control value. These terms also encompass ranges consisting of any lower indicated value to any higher indicated value, for example “from about 5% to about 50%”, etc.
“Expression” or “expressing” refers to production of a functional product, such as, the generation of an RNA transcript from an introduced construct, an endogenous DNA sequence, or a stably incorporated heterologous DNA sequence. A nucleotide encoding sequence may comprise intervening sequence (e.g., introns) or may lack such intervening non-translated sequences (e.g., as in cDNA). Expressed genes include those that are transcribed into mRNA and then translated into protein and those that are transcribed into RNA but not translated (for example, siRNA, transfer RNA, and ribosomal RNA). The term may also refer to a polypeptide produced from an mRNA generated from any of the above DNA precursors. Thus, expression of a nucleic acid fragment, such as a gene or a promoter region of a gene, may refer to transcription of the nucleic acid fragment (e.g., transcription resulting in mRNA or other functional RNA) and/or translation of RNA into a precursor or mature protein (polypeptide), or both.
An “expression cassette” refers to a nucleic acid construct, which when introduced into a host cell, results in transcription and/or translation of a RNA or polypeptide, respectively.
The term “genome” as it applies to a plant cells encompasses not only chromosomal DNA found within the nucleus, but organelle DNA found within subcellular components (e.g., mitochondrial, plastid) of the cell. As used herein, the term “genome” refers to the nuclear genome unless indicated otherwise. However, expression in a plastid genome, e.g., a chloroplast genome, or targeting to a plastid genome such as a chloroplast via the use of a plastid targeting sequence, is also encompassed by the present disclosure.
The term “heterologous” refers to a nucleic acid fragment or protein that is foreign to its surroundings. In the context of a nucleic acid fragment, this is typically accomplished by introducing such fragment, derived from one source, into a different host. Heterologous nucleic acid fragments, such as coding sequences that have been inserted into a host organism, are not normally found in the genetic complement of the host organism. As used herein, the term “heterologous” also refers to a nucleic acid fragment derived from the same organism, but which is located in a different, e.g., non-native, location within the genome of this organism. Thus, the organism can have more than the usual number of copy(ies) of such fragment located in its(their) normal position within the genome and in addition, in the case of plant cells, within different genomes within a cell, for example in the nuclear genome and within a plastid or mitochondrial genome as well. A nucleic acid fragment that is heterologous with respect to an organism into which it has been inserted or transferred is sometimes referred to as a “transgene.”
A “heterologous” PGRL1 protein or CAB transit peptide protein-encoding nucleotide sequence, etc., can be one or more additional copies of an endogenous PGRL1 protein or CAB transit peptide protein-encoding nucleotide sequence, or a nucleotide sequence from another plant or other source. PGRL1 is a putative ferredoxin-plastoquinone reductase involved in photosynthetic cyclic electron flow. Furthermore, these can be genomic or non-genomic nucleotide sequences. Non-genomic nucleotide sequences encoding such proteins and peptides include, by way of non-limiting examples, mRNA; synthetically produced DNA including, for example, cDNA and codon-optimized sequences for efficient expression in different transgenic plants algae reflecting the pattern of codon usage in such plants; nucleotide sequences encoding the same proteins or peptides, but which are degenerate in accordance with the degeneracy of the genetic code; which contain conservative amino acid substitutions that do not adversely affect their activity, etc., as known by those of ordinary skill in the art.
The term “homology” describes a mathematically based comparison of sequence similarities which is used to identify genes or proteins with similar functions or motifs. The nucleic acid and protein sequences of the present invention can be used as a “query sequence” to perform a search against public databases to, for example, identify other family members, related sequences, or homologs. The term “homologous” refers to the relationship between two nucleic acid sequence and/or proteins that possess a “common evolutionary origin”, including nucleic acids and/or proteins from superfamilies (e.g., the immunoglobulin superfamily) in the same species of animal, as well as homologous nucleic acids and/or proteins from different species of animal (for example, myosin light chain polypeptide, etc.; see Reeck et al., (1987) Cell, 50:667). Such proteins (and their encoding nucleic acids) may have sequence homology, as reflected by sequence similarity, whether in terms of percent identity or by the presence of specific residues or motifs and conserved positions. The methods disclosed herein contemplate the use of the presently disclosed nucleic and protein sequences, as well as sequences having sequence identity and/or similarity, and similar function.
“Host cell” means a cell which contains a vector and supports the replication and/or expression of the vector. Host cells may be prokaryotic cells such as E. coli, or eukaryotic cells such as yeast, insect, amphibian, or mammalian cells. Alternatively, the host cells are monocotyledonous or dicotyledonous plant cells.
The term “introduced” means providing a nucleic acid (e.g., an expression construct) or protein into a cell. “Introduced” includes reference to the incorporation of a nucleic acid into a eukaryotic or prokaryotic cell where the nucleic acid may be incorporated into the genome of the cell, and includes reference to the transient provision of a nucleic acid or protein to the cell. “Introduced” includes reference to stable or transient transformation methods, as well as sexually crossing. Thus, “introduced” in the context of inserting a nucleic acid fragment (e.g., a recombinant DNA construct/expression construct) into a cell, can mean “transfection” or “transformation” or “transduction”, and includes reference to the incorporation of a nucleic acid fragment into a eukaryotic or prokaryotic cell where the nucleic acid fragment may be incorporated into the genome of the cell (e.g., chromosome, plasmid, plastid, or mitochondrial DNA), converted into an autonomous replicon, or transiently expressed (e.g., transfected mRNA).
The term “isolated” refers to a material such as a nucleic acid molecule, polypeptide, or small molecule, that has been separated from the environment from which it was obtained. It can also mean altered from the natural state. For example, a polynucleotide or a polypeptide naturally present in a living animal is not “isolated” but the same polynucleotide or polypeptide separated from the coexisting materials of its natural state is “isolated”, as the term is employed herein. Thus, a polypeptide or polynucleotide produced and/or contained within a recombinant host cell is considered isolated. Also intended as “isolated polypeptides” or “isolated nucleic acid molecules”, etc., are polypeptides or nucleic acid molecules that have been purified, partially or substantially, from a recombinant host cell or from a native source.
As used herein, “nucleic acid” or “nucleotide sequence” means a polynucleotide (or oligonucleotide), including single or double-stranded polymers of deoxyribonucleotide or ribonucleotide bases, and unless otherwise indicated, encompasses naturally occurring and synthetic nucleotide analogues having the essential nature of natural nucleotides in that they hybridize to complementary single-stranded nucleic acids in a manner similar to naturally occurring nucleotides. Nucleic acids may also include fragments and modified nucleotide sequences. Nucleic acids disclosed herein can either be naturally occurring, for example genomic nucleic acids, or isolated, purified, non-genomic nucleic acids, including synthetically produced nucleic acid sequences such as those made by solid phase chemical oligonucleotide synthesis, enzymatic synthesis, or by recombinant methods, including for example, cDNA, codon-optimized sequences for efficient expression in different transgenic plants reflecting the pattern of codon usage in such plants, nucleotide sequences that differ from the nucleotide sequences disclosed herein due to the degeneracy of the genetic code but that still encode the protein(s) of interest disclosed herein, nucleotide sequences encoding the presently disclosed protein(s) comprising conservative (or non-conservative) amino acid substitutions that do not adversely affect their normal activity, PCR-amplified nucleotide sequences, and other non-genomic forms of nucleotide sequences familiar to those of ordinary skill in the art.
The protein-encoding nucleotide sequences, and promoter nucleotide sequences used to drive their expression, disclosed herein can be genomic or non-genomic nucleotide sequences. Non-genomic nucleotide protein-encoding sequences and promoters include, for example, naturally-occurring mRNA, synthetically produced mRNA, naturally-occurring DNA, or synthetically produced DNA. Synthetic nucleotide sequences can be produced by means well known in the art, including by chemical or enzymatic synthesis of oligonucleotides, and include, for example, cDNA, codon-optimized sequences for efficient expression in different transgenic plants and algae reflecting the pattern of codon usage in such organisms, variants containing conservative (or non-conservative) amino acid substitutions that do not adversely affect their normal activity, PCR-amplified nucleotide sequences, etc.
“A PGRL1 protein”, “a PGR5 protein”, “a HLA3 protein”, “a CAB transit peptide”, “a PGR5 transit peptide”, or any other protein or peptide presently broadly disclosed and utilized in any of the CCM methods and plants and algae disclosed herein refers to a protein or peptide exhibiting enzymatic/functional activity similar or identical to the enzymatic/functional activity of the specifically named protein or peptide. Enzymatic/functional activities of the proteins and peptides disclosed herein are described below. “Similar” enzymatic/functional activity of a protein or peptide can be in the range of from about 75% to about 125% or more of the enzymatic/functional activity of the specifically named protein or peptide when equal amounts of both proteins or peptides are assayed, tested, or expressed as described below under identical conditions, and can therefore be satisfactorily substituted for the specifically named proteins or peptides in the present enhanced CCM methods and transgenic plants and algae.
“Nucleic acid construct” or “construct” refers to an isolated polynucleotide which can be introduced into a host cell. This construct may comprise any combination of deoxyribonucleotides, ribonucleotides, and/or modified nucleotides. This construct may comprise an expression cassette that can be introduced into and expressed in a host cell.
“Operably linked” refers to a functional arrangement of elements. A first nucleic acid sequence is operably linked with a second nucleic acid sequence when the first nucleic acid sequence is placed in a functional relationship with the second nucleic acid sequence. For instance, a promoter is operably linked to a coding sequence if the promoter effects the transcription or expression of the coding sequence. The control elements need not be contiguous with the coding sequence, so long as they function to direct the expression thereof. Thus, for example, intervening untranslated yet transcribed sequences can be present between a promoter and the coding sequence and the promoter can still be considered “operably linked” to the coding sequence.
The terms “plant” or “plants” that can be used in the present methods broadly include the classes of higher and lower plants amenable to transformation techniques, including angiosperms (monocotyledonous and dicotyledonous plants), gymnosperms, ferns, and unicellular and multicellular algae. The term “plant” also includes plants which have been modified by breeding, mutagenesis, or genetic engineering (transgenic and non-transgenic plants). It includes plants of a variety of ploidy levels, including aneuploid, polyploid, diploid, haploid, and hemizygous. The plant may be in any form including suspension cultures, embryos, meristematic regions, callus tissue, gametophytes, sporophytes, pollen, microspores, whole plants, shoot vegetative organs/structures (e.g. leaves, stems and tubers), roots, flowers and floral organs/structures, seed (including embryo, endosperm, and seed coat) and fruit, plant tissue (e.g. vascular tissue, ground tissue, and the like) and cells, and progeny of same.
Embodiments of the present disclosure also include parts of plants or algae, which can be selected from among a protoplast, a cell, a tissue, an organ, a cutting, an explant, a reproductive tissue, a vegetative tissue, biomass, an inflorescence, a flower, a sepal, a petal, a pistil, a stigma, a style, an ovary, an ovule, an embryo, a receptacle, a seed, a fruit, a stamen, a filament, an anther, a male or female gametophyte, a pollen grain, a meristem, a terminal bud, an axillary bud, a leaf, a stem, a root, a tuberous root, a rhizome, a tuber, a stolon, a corm, a bulb, an offset, a cell of said plant in culture, a tissue of said plant in culture, an organ of said plant in culture, a callus, propagation materials, germplasm, cuttings, divisions, and propagations.
Other embodiments include progeny or derivatives of transgenic plants and algae disclosed herein selected, for example, from among clones, hybrids, samples, seeds, and harvested material. Progeny can be asexually or sexually produced by methods well known in the art.
Useful C3 and C4 Plants
Plants to which the methods disclosed herein can be advantageously applied include both C3 and C4 plants, including “food crop” and “oilseed” plants, as well as algae.
Food Crop Plants
The term “food crop plant” refers to plants that are either directly edible, or which produce edible products, and that are customarily used to feed humans either directly, or indirectly through animals. Non-limiting examples of such plants include:
1. Cereal crops: wheat, rice, maize (corn), barley, oats, sorghum, rye, and millet;
2. Protein crops: peanuts, chickpeas, lentils, kidney beans, soybeans, lima beans;
3. Roots and tubers: potatoes, sweet potatoes, and cassavas;
4. Oil crops: soybeans, corn, canola, peanuts, palm, coconuts, safflower, cottonseed, sunflower, flax, olive, and safflower;
5. Sugar crops: sugar cane and sugar beets;
6. Fruit crops: bananas, oranges, apples, pears, breadfruit, pineapples, and cherries;
7. Vegetable crops and tubers: tomatoes, lettuce, carrots, melons, asparagus, etc.
8. Nuts: cashews, peanuts, walnuts, pistachio nuts, almonds;
9. Forage and turf grasses;
10. Forage legumes: alfalfa, clover;
11. Drug crops: coffee, cocoa, kola nut, poppy;
12. Spice and flavoring crops: vanilla, sage, thyme, anise, saffron, menthol, peppermint, spearmint, coriander.
In certain embodiments of this disclosure, the food crop plants are soybean, canola, tomato, potato, cassava, wheat, rice, oats, lettuce, broccoli, beets, sugar beets, beans, peas, kale, strawberry, and peanut.
“Oilseed Plants”, “Oil Crop Plants”, “Biofuels Crops”, “Energy Crops”
The terms “oilseed plant” or “oil crop plant”, and the like, to which the present methods and compositions can also be applied, refer to plants that produce seeds or fruit with oil content in the range of from about 1 to 2%, e.g., wheat, to about 20%, e.g., soybeans, to over 40%, e.g., sunflowers and rapeseed (canola). These include major and minor oil crops, as well as wild plant species which are used, or are being investigated and/or developed, as sources of biofuels due to their significant oil production and accumulation.
Exemplary oil seed or oil crop plants useful in practicing the methods disclosed herein include, but are not limited to, plants of the genera Brassica (e.g., rapeseed/canola (Brassica napus; Brassica carinata; Brassica nigra; Brassica oleracea), Camelina, Miscanthus, and Jatropha; Jojoba (Simmondsia chinensis), coconut; cotton; peanut; rice; safflower; sesame; soybean; mustard; wheat; flax (linseed); sunflower; olive; corn; palm; palm kernel; sugarcane; castor bean; switchgrass; Borago officinalis; Echium plantagineum; Cuphea hookeriana; Cuphea pulcherrima; Cuphea lanceolata; Ricinus communis; Coriandrum sativum; Crepis alpina; Vernonia galamensis; Momordica charantia; and Crambe abyssinica.
A non-limiting example of a tuber that accumulates significant amounts of reserve lipids is the tuber of Cyperus esculentus (chufa or tigernuts), which has been proposed as an oil crop for biofuel production. In the case of chufa, use of a constitutive or tuber-specific promoter would be useful in the methods disclosed herein.
Useful Algae
Algae useful in practicing various methods of the present disclosure include members of the following divisions: Chlorophyta and Heterokontophyta.
In certain embodiments, useful algae include members of the following classes: Chlorophyceae, Bacillariophyceae, Eustigmatophyceae, and Chrysophyceae. In certain embodiments, useful algae include members of the following genera: Nannochloropsis, Chlorella, Dunaliella, Scenedesmus, Selenastrum, Oscillatoria, Phormidium, Spirulina, Amphora, and Ochromonas. In one embodiment, members of the genus Chlorella are preferred.
Some algal species of particular interest include, without limitation: Bacillariophyceae strains, Chlorophyceae, Cyanophyceae, Xanthophyceae, Chrysophyceae, Chlorella, Crypthecodinium, Schizocytrium, Nannochloropsis, Ulkenia, Dunaliella, Cyclotella, Navicula, Nitzschia, Cyclotella, Phaeodactylum, and Thaustochytrid.
Non-limiting examples of algae species that can be used with the methods of the present disclosure include, for example, Achnanthes orientalis, Agmenellum spp., Amphiprora hyaline, Amphora coffeiformis, Amphora coffeiformis var. linea, Amphora coffeiformis var. punctata, Amphora coffeiformis var. taylori, Amphora coffeiformis var. tenuis, Amphora delicatissima, Amphora delicatissima var. capitata, Amphora sp., Anabaena, Ankistrodesmus, Ankistrodesmus falcatus, Boekelovia hooglandii, Borodinella sp., Botryococcus braunii, Botryococcus sudeticus, Bracteococcus minor, Bracteococcus medionucleatus, Carteria, Chaetoceros gracilis, Chaetoceros muelleri, Chaetoceros muelleri var. subsalsum, Chaetoceros sp., Chlamydomas perigranulata, Chlore Ila anitrata, Chlorella antarctica, Chlorella aureoviridis, Chlorella Candida, Chlorella capsulate, Chlorella desiccate, Chlorella ellipsoidea, Chlorella emersonii, Chlorella fusca, Chlorella fusca var. vacuolata, Chlorella glucotropha, Chlorella infusionum, Chlorella infusionum var. actophila, Chlorella infusionum var. auxenophila, Chlorella kessleri, Chlorella lobophora, Chlorella luteoviridis, Chlorella luteoviridis var. aureoviridis, Chlorella luteoviridis var. lutescens, Chlorella miniata, Chlorella minutissima, Chlorella mutabilis, Chlorella nocturna, Chlorella ovalis, Chlorella parva, Chlorella photophila, Chlorella pringsheimii, Chlorella protothecoides, Chlorella protothecoides var. acidicola, Chlorella regularis, Chlorella regularis var. minima, Chlorella regularis var. umbricata, Chlorella reisiglii, Chlorella saccharophila, Chlorella saccharophila var. ellipsoidea, Chlorella salina, Chlorella simplex, Chlorella sorokiniana, Chlorella sp., Chlorella sphaerica, Chlorella stigmatophora, Chlorella vanniellii, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorella vulgaris fo. tertia, Chlorella vulgaris var. autotrophica, Chlorella vulgaris var. viridis, Chlorella vulgaris var. vulgaris, Chlorella vulgaris var. vulgaris fo. tertia, Chlorella vulgaris var. vulgaris fo. viridis, Chlorella xanthella, Chlorella zofingiensis, Chlorella trebouxioides, Chlorella vulgaris, Chlorococcum infusionum, Chlorococcum sp., Chlorogonium, Chroomonas sp., Chrysosphaera sp., Cricosphaera sp., Crypthecodinium cohnii, Cryptomonas sp., Cyclotella cryptica, Cyclotella meneghiniana, Cyclotella sp., Chlamydomonas moewusii Chlamydomonas reinhardtii Chlamydomonas sp. Dunaliella sp., Dunaliella bardawil, Dunaliella bioculata, Dunaliella granulate, Dunaliella maritime, Dunaliella minuta, Dunaliella parva, Dunaliella peircei, Dunaliella primolecta, Dunaliella salina, Dunaliella terricola, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Dunaliella viridis, Dunaliella tertiolecta, Eremosphaera viridis, Eremosphaera sp., Ellipsoidon sp., Euglena spp., Franceia sp., Fragilaria crotonensis, Fragilaria sp., Gleocapsa sp., Gloeothamnion sp., Haematococcus pluvialis, Hymenomonas sp., Isochrysis aff. galbana, Isochrysis galbana, Lepocinclis, Micractinium, Micractinium, Monoraphidium minutum, Monoraphidium sp., Nannochloris sp., Nannochloropsis salina, Nannochloropsis sp., Navicula acceptata, Navicula biskanterae, Navicula pseudotenelloides, Navicula pelliculosa, Navicula saprophila, Navicula sp., Nephrochloris sp., Nephroselmis sp., Nitschia communis, Nitzschia alexandrina, Nitzschia closterium, Nitzschia communis, Nitzschia dissipata, Nitzschia frustulum, Nitzschia hantzschiana, Nitzschia inconspicua, Nitzschia intermedia, Nitzschia microcephala, Nitzschia pusilla, Nitzschia pusilla elliptica, Nitzschia pusilla monoensis, Nitzschia quadrangular, Nitzschia sp., Ochromonas sp., Oocystis parva, Oocystis pusilla, Oocystis sp., Oscillatoria limnetica, Oscillatoria sp., Oscillatoria subbrevis, Parachlorella kessleri, Pascheria acidophila, Pavlova sp., Phaeodactylum tricomutum, Phagus, Phormidium, Platymonas sp., Pleurochrysis carterae, Pleurochrysis dentate, Pleurochrysis sp., Prototheca wickerhamii, Prototheca stagnora, Prototheca portoricensis, Prototheca moriformis, Prototheca zopfii, Pseudochlorella aquatica, Pyramimonas sp., Pyrobotrys, Rhodococcus opacus, Sarcinoid chrysophyte, Scenedesmus armatus, Schizochytrium, Spirogyra, Spirulina platensis, Stichococcus sp., Synechococcus sp., Synechocystisf, Tagetes erecta, Tagetes patula, Tetraedron, Tetraselmis sp., Tetraselmis suecica, Thalassiosira weissflogii, and Viridiella fridericiana.
In certain embodiments of this disclosure, the algae are species of Chlorella, Nannochloropsis, and Chlamydomonas listed above.
Exemplary food crop plant include wheat, rice, maize (corn), barley, oats, sorghum, rye, and millet; peanuts, chickpeas, lentils, kidney beans, soybeans, lima beans; potatoes, sweet potatoes, and cassavas; soybeans, corn, canola, peanuts, palm, coconuts, safflower, cottonseed, sunflower, flax, olive, and safflower; sugar cane and sugar beets; bananas, oranges, apples, pears, breadfruit, pineapples, and cherries; tomatoes, lettuce, carrots, melons, strawberry, asparagus, broccoli, peas, kale, cashews, peanuts, walnuts, pistachio nuts, almonds; forage and turf grasses; alfalfa, clover; coffee, cocoa, kola nut, poppy; vanilla, sage, thyme, anise, saffron, menthol, peppermint, spearmint and coriander and preferably wheat, rice and canola.
The terms “peptide”, “polypeptide”, and “protein” are used to refer to polymers of amino acid residues. These terms are specifically intended to cover naturally occurring biomolecules, as well as those that are recombinantly or synthetically produced, for example by solid phase synthesis.
The term “promoter” or “regulatory element” refers to a region or nucleic acid sequence located upstream or downstream from the start of transcription and which is involved in recognition and binding of RNA polymerase and/or other proteins to initiate transcription of RNA. Promoters need not be of plant or algal origin. For example, promoters derived from plant viruses, such as the CaMV35S promoter, or from other organisms, can be used in variations of the embodiments discussed herein. Promoters useful in the present methods include, for example, constitutive, strong, weak, tissue-specific, cell-type specific, seed-specific, inducible, repressible, and developmentally regulated promoters.
A skilled person appreciates that a promoter sequence can be modified to provide for a range of expression levels of an operably linked heterologous nucleic acid molecule. Less than the entire promoter region can be utilized and the ability to drive expression retained. However, it is recognized that expression levels of mRNA can be decreased with deletions of portions of the promoter sequence. Thus, the promoter can be modified to be a weak or strong promoter. A promoter is classified as strong or weak according to its affinity for RNA polymerase (and/or sigma factor); this is related to how closely the promoter sequence resembles the ideal consensus sequence for the polymerase. Generally, by “weak promoter” is intended a promoter that drives expression of a coding sequence at a low level. By “low level” is intended levels of about 1/10,000 transcripts to about 1/100,000 transcripts to about 1/500,000 transcripts. Conversely, a strong promoter drives expression of a coding sequence at a high level, or at about 1/10 transcripts to about 1/100 transcripts to about 1/1,000 transcripts. The promoter of choice is preferably excised from its source by restriction enzymes, but can alternatively be PCR-amplified using primers that carry appropriate terminal restriction sites. It should be understood that the foregoing groups of promoters are non-limiting, and that one skilled in the art could employ other promoters that are not explicitly cited herein.
The term “purified” refers to material such as a nucleic acid, a protein, or a small molecule, which is substantially or essentially free from components which normally accompany or interact with the material as found in its naturally occurring environment, and/or which may optionally comprise material not found within the purified material's natural environment. The latter may occur when the material of interest is expressed or synthesized in a non-native environment. Nucleic acids and proteins that have been isolated include nucleic acids and proteins purified by standard purification methods. The term also encompasses nucleic acids and proteins prepared by recombinant expression in a host cell as well as chemically synthesized nucleic acids.
“Recombinant” refers to a nucleotide sequence, peptide, polypeptide, or protein, expression of which is engineered or manipulated using standard recombinant methodology. This term applies to both the methods and the resulting products. As used herein, a “recombinant construct”, “expression construct”, “chimeric construct”, “construct” and “recombinant expression cassette” are used interchangeably herein.
As used herein, the phrase “sequence identity” or “sequence similarity” is the similarity between two (or more) nucleic acid sequences, or two (or more) amino acid sequences. Sequence identity is frequently measured as the percent of identical nucleotide or amino acid residues at corresponding positions in two or more sequences when the sequences are aligned to maximize sequence matching, i.e., taking into account gaps and insertions.
One of ordinary skill in the art will appreciate that sequence identity ranges are provided for guidance only. It is entirely possible that nucleic acid sequences that do not show a high degree of sequence identity can nevertheless encode amino acid sequences having similar functional activity. It is understood that changes in nucleic acid sequence can be made using the degeneracy of the genetic code to produce multiple nucleic acid molecules that all encode substantially the same protein. Means for making this adjustment are well-known to those of skill in the art. When percentage of sequence identity is used in reference to amino acid sequences it is recognized that residue positions which are not identical often differ by conservative amino acid substitutions, where amino acid residues are substituted for other amino acid residues with similar chemical properties (e.g., charge or hydrophobicity) and therefore do not change the functional properties of the molecule. Where sequences differ in conservative substitutions, the percent sequence identity may be adjusted upwards to correct for the conservative nature of the substitution. Sequences which differ by such conservative substitutions are said to have “sequence similarity” or “similarity”. Means for making this adjustment are well-known to those of skill in the art. Typically this involves scoring a conservative substitution as a partial rather than a full mismatch, thereby increasing the percentage sequence identity.
“Percentage of sequence identity” is determined by comparing two optimally aligned sequences over a comparison window, wherein the portion of the polynucleotide sequence in the comparison window may comprise additions or deletions (i.e., gaps) as compared to the reference sequence (which does not comprise additions or deletions) for optimal alignment of the two sequences. The percentage is calculated by determining the number of positions at which the identical nucleic acid base or amino acid residue occurs in both sequences to yield the number of matched positions, dividing the number of matched positions by the total number of positions in the window of comparison and multiplying the result by 100 to yield the percentage of sequence identity.
Sequence identity (or similarity) can be readily calculated by known methods, including but not limited to those described in: Computational Molecular Biology, Lesk, A. M., ed., Oxford University Press, New York, 1988; Biocomputing: Informatics and Genome Projects, Smith, D. W., ed., Academic Press, New York, 1993; Computer Analysis of Sequence Data, Part I, Griffin, A. M., and Griffin, H. G., eds., Humana Press, New Jersey, 1994; Sequence Analysis in Molecular Biology, von Heinje, G., Academic Press, 1987; and Sequence Analysis Primer, Gribskov, M. and Devereux, J., eds., M Stockton Press, New York, 1991; and Carillo, H., and Lipman, D., SIAM J. Applied Math., 48: 1073 (1988). Methods to determine identity are designed to give the largest match between the sequences tested. Moreover, methods to determine identity are codified in publicly available computer programs. Optimal alignment of sequences for comparison can be conducted, for example, by the local homology algorithm of Smith & Waterman, by the homology alignment algorithms, by the search for similarity method or, by computerized implementations of these algorithms (GAP, BESTFIT, PASTA, and TFASTA in the GCG Wisconsin Package, available from Accelrys, Inc., San Diego, Calif., United States of America), or by visual inspection. See generally, (Altschul, S. F. et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410 (1990) and Altschul et al. Nucl. Acids Res. 25: 3389-3402 (1997)).
One example of an algorithm that is suitable for determining percent sequence identity and sequence similarity is the BLAST algorithm, which is described in (Altschul, S., et al., NCBI NLM NIH Bethesda, Md. 20894; & Altschul, S., et al., J. Mol. Biol. 215: 403-410 (1990). Software for performing BLAST analyses is publicly available through the National Center for Biotechnology Information. This algorithm involves first identifying high scoring sequence pairs (HSPs) by identifying short words of length W in the query sequence, which either match or satisfy some positive-valued threshold score T when aligned with a word of the same length in a database sequence. T is referred to as the neighborhood word score threshold. These initial neighborhood word hits act as seeds for initiating searches to find longer HSPs containing them. The word hits are then extended in both directions along each sequence for as far as the cumulative alignment score can be increased. Cumulative scores are calculated using, for nucleotide sequences, the parameters M (reward score for a pair of matching residues; always >0) and N (penalty score for mismatching residues; always <0). For amino acid sequences, a scoring matrix is used to calculate the cumulative score. Extension of the word hits in each direction are halted when: the cumulative alignment score falls off by the quantity X from its maximum achieved value, the cumulative score goes to zero or below due to the accumulation of one or more negative-scoring residue alignments, or the end of either sequence is reached. The BLAST algorithm parameters W, T, and X determine the sensitivity and speed of the alignment. The BLASTN program (for nucleotide sequences) uses as defaults a wordlength (W) of 11, an expectation (E) of 10, a cutoff of 100, M=5, N=−4, and a comparison of both strands. For amino acid sequences, the BLASTP program uses as defaults a wordlength (VV) of 3, an expectation (E) of 10, and the BLOSUM62 scoring matrix (see Henikoff & Henikoff(1989) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 89:10915).
In addition to calculating percent sequence identity, the BLAST algorithm also performs a statistical analysis of the similarity between two sequences (see, e.g., Karlin & Altschul, Proc. Nat'l. Acad. Sci. USA 90: 5873-5877 (1993)). One measure of similarity provided by the BLAST algorithm is the smallest sum probability (P (N)), which provides an indication of the probability by which a match between two nucleotide or amino acid sequences would occur by chance. BLAST searches assume that proteins can be modeled as random sequences. However, many real proteins comprise regions of nonrandom sequences which may be homopolymeric tracts, short-period repeats, or regions enriched in one or more amino acids. Such low-complexity regions may be aligned between unrelated proteins even though other regions of the protein are entirely dissimilar. A number of low-complexity filter programs can be employed to reduce such low-complexity alignments. For example, the SEG (Wooten and Federhen, Comput. Chern., 17: 149-163 (1993)) and XNU (Claverie and States, Comput. Chern., 17: 191-201 (1993)) low-complexity filters can be employed alone or in combination.
The constructs and methods disclosed herein encompass nucleic acid and protein sequences having sequence identity/sequence similarity at least about 75%, 80%, 85%, 90%, 91%, 92%, 93%, 94%, 95%, 96%, 97%, 98%, 99%, 100% to those specifically and/or sequences having the same or similar function for example if a protein or nucleic acid is identified with a transit peptide and the transit peptide is cleaved leaving the protein sequence without the transit peptide then the sequence identity/sequence similarity is compared to the protein with and/or without the transit peptide.
A “transgenic” organism, such as a transgenic plant, is a host organism that has been stably or transiently genetically engineered to contain one or more heterologous nucleic acid fragments, including nucleotide coding sequences, expression cassettes, vectors, etc. Introduction of heterologous nucleic acids into a host cell to create a transgenic cell is not limited to any particular mode of delivery, and includes, for example, microinjection, floral dip, adsorption, electroporation, vacuum infiltration, particle gun bombardment, whiskers-mediated transformation, liposome-mediated delivery, Agrobacterium-mediated transfer, the use of viral and retroviral vectors, etc., as is well known to those skilled in the art.
Conventional techniques of molecular biology, recombinant DNA technology, microbiology, and chemistry useful in practicing the methods of the present disclosure are described, for example, in Green and Sambrook (2012) Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual, Fourth Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Ausubel et al. (2003 and periodic supplements) Current Protocols in Molecular Biology, John Wiley & Sons, New York, N.Y.; Amberg et al. (2005) Methods in Yeast Genetics: A Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Course Manual, 2005 Edition, Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Roe et al. (1996) DNA Isolation and Sequencing: Essential Techniques, John Wiley & Sons; J. M. Polak and James O′D. McGee (1990) In Situ Hybridization: Principles and Practice; Oxford University Press; M. J. Gait (Editor) (1984) Oligonucleotide Synthesis: A Practical Approach, IRL Press; D. M. J. Lilley and J. E. Dahlberg (1992) Methods in Enzymology: DNA Structure Part A: Synthesis and Physical Analysis of DNA, Academic Press; and Lab Ref: A Handbook of Recipes, Reagents, and Other Reference Tools for Use at the Bench, Edited by Jane Roskams and Linda Rodgers (2002) Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press; Burgess and Deutscher (2009) Guide to Protein Purification, Second Edition (Methods in Enzymology, Vol. 463), Academic Press. Note also U.S. Pat. Nos. 8,178,339; 8,119,365; 8,043,842; 8,039,243; 7,303,906; 6,989,265; US20120219994A1; and EP1483367B1. The entire contents of each of these texts and patent documents are herein incorporated by reference.
Preliminary Results: Transgenic Plants Expressing Algal CCM Genes
Previously, reconstitution of a functional inorganic CCM in C3 plants to suppress photorespiration and enhance photosynthesis was proposed. In WO 2012/125737, it was hypothesized that expression of a minimum of three algal CCM proteins would be sufficient to elevate internal plastid CO2 concentrations high enough to suppress photorespiration. These three algal CCM genes included the Chlamydomonas plasma membrane-localized and ATP-dependent bicarbonate transporter, HLA3; the chloroplast envelope localized bicarbonate anion transporter, LCIA; and a chloroplast stromal-localized carbonic anhydrase (HCA-II) to accelerate conversion of bicarbonate into CO2. These genes have individually been shown to be important to the CCM in prior studies ([3-5]). To test this hypothesis, we generated multiple independent transgenic Arabidopsis and Camelina plants expressing each CCM gene as a single gene construct, as well as a stacked 3-gene construct. The expression of each gene was controlled by the light-regulated Cab1 gene promoter [6].
The results of phenotypic analyses of Arabidopsis and Camelina plants transformed with the single CCM gene constructs were as follows:
HLA3 Arabidopsis transgenics varied in their phenotypes, but generally had reduced growth phenotypes relative to wild-type (VVT) plants (
With respect to carbonic anhydrase (CA) transgenics, we expressed a human carbonic anhydrase-2 (HCA2 (SEQ ID NO:17)) or a bacterial Neisseria gonorrhoeae carbonic anhydrase (BCA SEQ ID NO: 4)) in the chloroplast stroma [7]. We choose these CAs because each has a turnover number (Kcat=106 sec-1) that is approximately 10× faster than plant/algal Cas. In both Arabidopsis and Camelina, we observed phenotypes that were either similar to WT (HCA2) or substantially larger (BCA) than WT plants (
Transgenic Arabidopsis plants expressing the LCIA gene were substantially impaired in growth (
The fact that expression of individual CCM genes impaired growth in C3 plants suggested that additional traits may need to be expressed or silenced to achieve optimal photosynthetic performance.
To determine if we could reconstitute a fully functional CCM complex in C3 plants, we transformed Arabidopsis and Camelina with a triple-gene CCM construct in which the expression of the HLA3, CA, and LCIA genes was driven by the green-tissue specific Cab1 promoter. In both Arabidopsis and Camelina there was either a substantial impairment in growth, or the plants did not survive (results not shown).
Thus, co-expression of the HLA3 gene with any other CCM gene(s) impaired growth even in plants in which expression of the other CCM genes, e.g., LCIA in Camelina, or BCA in Arabidopsis, enhanced growth. These results indicated that HLA3 expression was problematic.
Since the HLA3 protein catalyzes active bicarbonate transport and is the first-dedicated step in the engineered CCM, we re-focused our efforts on trying to determine why HLA3 expression was toxic to plants and how to mitigate its effects. We considered two possible hypotheses for HLA3 toxicity: 1) expression of the HLA3 ABC-transporter increases ATP demand (1 ATP/COO for photosynthesis by 25% and depletes cytoplasmic ATP levels [3-5,8] and 2) elevated bicarbonate levels in HLA3 transgenic plants negatively impact cytoplasmic pH levels. With respect to the latter hypothesis, it is noteworthy that unlike cyanobacteria, plants have robust cytoplasmic CA activity, potentially mitigating the effects of elevated bicarbonate levels on cytoplasmic pH.
The Role of ATP Demand and Cyclic Electron Transfer Activity in CCMs
In contrast to air-grown algae (4 ATP/2 NADPH/CO2) and C4 plants (5 ATP/2 NADPH/CO2) which have increased ATP demands for photosynthesis, C3 plants (3 ATP/2 NADPH/CO2) have limited capacity to generate additional ATP for each electron transferred [8-10]. Increasing ATP demand by 25% per carbon fixed in HLA3 transgenic plants, therefore, could deplete cytoplasmic ATP levels as well as alter the redox state of the cell [8, 10]. One mechanism to increase ATP synthesis for each light-driven electron transferred is by cyclic electron transfer (CET) activity. Light-driven CET is catalyzed by photosystem I (PSI) mediated charge separation leading to the reduction of ferredoxin (fd) and the PGR5 protein. The PGR5 protein reduces and protonates plastoquinone (PQ). PQH2 is then oxidized by the cytochrome b6f complex (Cyt b6f). Protons released from the oxidation of PQH2 drive ATP synthesis. The electron transfer cycle is completed by the reduction of plastocyanin (PC) by Cyt b6f, which in turn is oxidized by the PSI primary donor P700+. Significantly, molecular studies have demonstrated that genes encoding proteins functional in CET are substantially overexpressed (4-10×) in C4 plants and air-grown algae relative to related C3 species or high CO2 grown algae [9,11-17]. These CET genes include: the Proton Gradient Regulation Genes PGR5 and PGRL1, and certain members of the Fd and ferredoxin NADP reductase (FNR) gene families [8-15]: Accession Nos.: PGR5:NM_126585; PGRL1: NM_179091; Fd: AtFd1: At1g10960; AtFd2:At1g60950; FNR: LFNR1:At5g66190; LFRN2: At1g20020) [15]. The sequence for the PRG5 protein with the transit peptide amino acid sequence underlined is provided as MAAASISAIG CNQTLIGTSF YGGWGSSISG EDYQTMLSKT VAPPQQARVS RKAIRAVPMMKNVNEGKGLF APLWVTRNL VGKKRFNQLR GKAIALHSQV ITEFCKSIGA DAKQRQGLIRAKKNGERLG FL (SEQ ID NO:1). The transit peptide is cleaved to produce the functional PGR5 protein.
To test the hypothesis that ATP depletion in HLA3 transgenics resulted in growth impairment, we compared the phenotypes of WT and HLA3 transgenics grown on nitrate which would require more linear electron transport (LET) to facilitate the reduction of nitrate. Significantly, the additional ATP produced by LET is not required for conversion of nitrate to ammonium and thus total ATP levels are expected to increase. In contrast, plants grown on ammonium do not require additional LET. Finally, we also grew transgenics on ammonium with sucrose which would presumably provide additional ATP via respiration [15, 17]. We hypothesized that growth on nitrate or ammonium with sucrose would provide additional ATP that could potentially drive HLA3 activity.
As shown in
This interpretation was corroborated by comparative metabolite analyses of leaf energy charge (EC) status (ATP), inorganic phosphate levels, and leaf reductive potential (RP) of WT and HLA3 transgenic Arabidopsis grown on nitrate. As shown in
Significantly, inorganic phosphate levels were two-fold higher in HLA3 line #20, while the NADH level was two-fold lower than WT.
These results are consistent with the hypothesis that HLA3 expression places increased ATP demand on plants. This increased ATP demand in HLA3 transgenics may be met in part via NAD(P)H oxidation via the malate/oxaloacetate redox shunt between the mitochondria and chloroplasts [16].
LCIA Phenotype Depends on Plant Species
As previously indicated, LCIA expression in transgenic Arabidopsis resulted in plants with severely depressed growth phenotypes (
Overview: Enhancing Photosynthetic Carbon Fixation by Increasing ATP Production and Limiting CO2 Diffusion Out of Artificial CCM Lines; Strategies for Facilitating CET and ATP Synthesis in C3 Plants
Prior attempts to subvert the limitations of photosynthesis have focused on engineering RuBisCO throughput and specificity [35] by introduction of engineered and non-native forms of the enzyme [36], through alterations in the regenerative capacity of the Calvin cycle [37,38] or by engineering photorespiratory bypasses [39]. These studies produced mixed results, thus advocating for a more comprehensive systems-level approach to enhance and/or redirect photosynthetic carbon flux.
As evidenced by our prior work described above, we postulate that both the carbon assimilatory steps and the light-based generation of ATP and NAPDH must be considered to develop a competent CCM with significantly improved photosynthetic capacity. To demonstrate proof of concept, an Arabidopsis line that contains a functional CCM that includes mechanisms to adjust ATP levels to meet transporter demand will be generated.
Enhancing CET and ATP Synthesis to Support HLA3-Dependent Bicarbonate Uptake
To exploit the expression of an algal CCM in C3 plants requires that we meet the additional energy demands required to actively transport inorganic carbon. As previously discussed in the section entitled “The role of ATP demand and cyclic electron transfer activity in CCMs”, C4 plants and algae have robust CET activity, and overexpress a variety of genes involved in CET [13,16,40-45] compared to C3 plants.
Several strategies are identified in the following examples, to increase ATP synthesis to support HLA3-dependent bicarbonate transport. Several of these strategies focus on elevating CET activity in C3 plants. Another approach involves the expression of a green photon-driven bacterial proton pump in thylakoids to supplement proton-driven ATP synthesis. Each approach is designed to complement existing CCM lines in Arabidopsis, Camelina, and potato we have created, and are evaluated based upon measured adenylate levels, plant biomass production, and photosynthetic measurements of carbon assimilation. The materials and methods employed in the examples below are for illustrative purposes only, and are not intended to limit the practice of the present embodiments thereto. Any materials and methods similar or equivalent to those described herein as would be apparent to one of ordinary skill in the art can be used in the testing or practice of the present embodiments, i.e., the materials, methods, and examples are illustrative only and not intended to be limiting.
Enhancing CET is based on overexpressing the proton gradient regulatory proteins PGR5 and/or PGRL1 which have previously been shown to be important to CET [37].
It has recently been demonstrated that the PGRL1 protein has antimycin A-sensitive (AA), ferredoxin-plastoquinone reductase (FQR) activity [46]. In Chlamydomonas, PGRL1 is part of the Cytb6f/PSI supercomplex which mediates CET. Significantly, PGRL1 forms homodimers as well as heterodimers with PGR5 via redox active cysteine residues. Under high-light conditions, thioredoxinred reduces PGRL1 dimers present in grana stacks, increasing the abundance of PGRL1 monomers and enhancing CET [47]. Mutational studies have shown that the PGR5 protein is required for Fd oxidation and PGRL1 reduction, but not for PQ reduction. In addition, it has been shown that PGRL1/PGR5 heterodimers are more active in CET than PGRL1 monomers. In C4 plants PGR5 and PGRL1 expression levels are elevated (4×) relative to C3 plants [9]. Similarly, PGR5 expression is up-regulated in air-grown Chlamydomonas (active CCM and HLA3 activity) relative to high CO2 (low CCM) grown cells [16,43]. Significantly, overexpression of PGRL1 and PGR5 has also been shown to increase AA-sensitive CET in transgenic Arabidopsis [48]. One embodiment of the present invention provides for an overexpression of PGRL1 gene (SEQ ID NO:106) and PGR5 gene with chloroplast targeting sequence (SEQ ID NO:2) with HLA3 gene (SEQ ID NO:12) or with HLA3 gene (SEQ ID NO:12) and LCIA gene (SEQ ID NO:16) and BCA gene codon optimized for expression in Arabidopsis (SEQ ID NO:4) to yield substantially increased photosynthetic rates, particularly in plants with enhanced sink strength (Camelina and potato for example). Co-expression of the PGR5 gene (SEQ ID NO:2) along with the HLA3 gene (SEQ ID NO:12) in Camelina rescued the HLA3 gene and it was no longer lethal. These results indicate that the PGR5 gene is enabling the production of sufficient ATP to meet the demands of the HLA3 gene product.
HLA3 (SEQ ID NO:12) and PGR5 (SEQ ID NO:2) are introduced as a double construct into Arabidopsis or Camelina, by Agrobacterium-mediated Ti plasmid transformation using, for example, plasmid pB110-HLA3-pgr5-dsred (
In one embodiment, the expression of each protein is driven by the light sensitive leaf-specific CAB1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:7) and Nos terminator (SEQ ID NO:9) (
The BCA gene (AAW89307; SEQ ID NO:4), under the control of CAB1 promoter, is introduced in to Arabidopsis by Agrobacterium-mediated Ti plasmid transformation by floral dip method using the construct shown in
As a visual marker, the plasmid also includes a gene for expression of fluorescent DsRed protein under the control of CVMV promoter and Nos terminator (
Plants are transformed by vacuum infiltration method (Lu and Kang (February, 2008) Plant Cell Rep. 27(2):273-8), and will be screened for biomass yield parameters (including plant weight, height, branching and seed yield) and photosynthetic efficiency measured as CO2 absorption with the aid of a LiCor 6400 gas exchange analyzer.
The PGRL1 gene from Arabidopsis (NM_179091 SEQ ID NO:3) will be subcloned into pCambia1301-based binary plasmid under control of the CAB1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:7) and Nos terminator (SEQ ID NO:9). The plasmid will also carry a gene for hygromycin selection marker. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation takes place by the standard floral dip method followed by germination of seeds on hygromycin to select for transformants. The expression of PRGL1 will be confirmed by RT-PCR, and the resulting transgenic plant lines will be crossed with HLA3/PGR5 plants and screened for biomass yield and photosynthesis rate (CO2 fixation).
It has recently been demonstrated that specific members of the ferredoxin (Fd) gene family facilitate CET. Overexpression of pea ferredoxin1 (Fd1) enhanced CET at the expense of LET in tobacco [16,40].
Therefore, another embodiment of the present invention provides enhancing ATP production and titrating the expression of the pea Fd1 gene in the three model C3 plants with and without co-expression of the CCM genes to determine if Fd1 overexpression can support the algal CCM and increased photosynthetic rates. Earlier results demonstrated that Fd1 overexpression slightly impaired Linear Electron Transfer (LET), resulting in a stunted phenotype [40]. We expect that the additional ATP demand in HLA3 transgenics, however, will mitigate these effects.
Fd1 gene (At1g10960) will be introduced by Agrobacterium-mediated Ti plasmid transformation. Fd1 gene will be subcloned into pCambia1301-based binary plasmid under control of CAB1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:7) and Nos terminator (SEQ ID NO:9). The plasmid will also carry a gene for hygromycin selection as a marker. Agrobacterium-mediated transformation takes place by the standard floral dip method, followed by germination of seeds on hygromycin to select for transformants. The expression of FD1 (SEQ ID NO:93) will be confirmed by real time QPCR, and the resulting plant lines exhibiting different levels of FD1 expression will be crossed with CCM-expressing plants and screened for biomass yield and photosynthesis rate with the aid of a LiCor 6400 CO2-gas exchange analyzer.
Yet another embodiment is based on overexpression of unique ferredoxin NADP reductase (FNR) gene family members associated with CET. Leaf FNR (LFNR) catalyzes the reduction of Fd and is involved in both LET and CET [15]. It was recently demonstrated that there are three LFNR gene family members expressed in maize leaves: Accession Nos. BAA88236 (LFNR1), BAA88237 (LFNR2), and ACF85815 (LFNR3).
LFNR-1 was shown to be localized to thylakoid membranes and associated with Cytb6f complexes. LFNR2 was present in thylakoids and stroma associated with Cytb6f complexes. LFNR3 was soluble and not associated with Cytb6f complexes.
Significantly, when plants were grown with nitrate instead of ammonium, expression of LFNR1 and LFNR2 was elevated but not that of LFNR3. In contrast, studies using Arabidopsis LFNR1 knock out mutants demonstrated that PGA-dependent oxygen evolution (which requires additional ATP) is more negatively affected than is nitrate-dependent oxygen evolution (no additional ATP demand), suggesting that LFNR1 may play a role in regulating CET [15]. However, this interpretation remains equivocal.
To determine if CET activity and HLA3 mediated inorganic carbon uptake can be altered by differential expression of LFNR1, we will both over-express (CAB1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:7)) and under-express (LFNR1 RNAi) LFNR1 in transgenic Arabidopsis to determine the impact of altered LFNR1 expression on functional CCM activity.
For overexpression of the LFNR1, the gene (At5g66190) will be introduced by Agrobacterium-mediated Ti plasmid transformation by floral dipping. The LFNR1gene will be subcloned into pCambia1301-based binary plasmid under control of the CAB1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:7) and Nos terminator (SEQ ID NO:9). The plasmid will also carry a gene for hygromycin selection as a marker. The expression of LFNR1 will be confirmed by real time QPCR, the resulting plant lines will be crossed with CCM-expressing plants, and screened for biomass yield and photosynthesis rate with the aid of a LiCor 6400 CO2-gas exchange analyzer.
For downregulaton of the LFNR1 levels, an RNAi construct containing a partial sequence of the LFNR1 (At5g66190 or BAA88236) and reverse complementary sequence of LFNR1 will be subcloned into pCambia1301-based binary plasmid under control of the CAB1 promoter (SEQ ID NO:7) and Nos terminator (SEQ ID NO:9). The plasmid will also carry a gene for hygromycin selection as a marker. The reduced level of LFNR1 expression will be confirmed by real time QPCR.
The resulting lines will be crossed with CCM-expressing lines to generate double mutants. Those mutants will be screened for biomass yield parameters (including plant weight, height, branching and seed yield) and photosynthetic efficiency measured as CO2 absorption with the aid of a LiCor 6400 gas exchange analyzer.
In yet another embodiment green photons, not absorbed by chlorophyll, to drive proton transport across thylakoids by expressing modified PR [49]) will be employed to enhance ATP synthesis (
PR is a seven-helix transmembrane-spanning protein similar to bacteriorhodopsin that contains retinal in its active site. Green light-driven cis-trans isomerization of retinal drives vectoral proton transfer across the membrane [50-55]. Significantly, it has been demonstrated that a functional PR could be expressed in a respiration-impaired mutant of E. coli when supplemented with exogenous all-trans retinal [56]. More recently, hydrogen production was shown to increase nearly two-fold in PR-expressing E. coli when cells were exposed to increasing light intensities (70 to 130 μE), indicating that PR can efficiently absorb light even at low intensities [57]. To the best of our knowledge, retinal complementation of other rhodopsins has not been reported. Significantly, PR-expressing E. coli respiratory mutants generated sufficient proton-motive force to support ATP synthesis levels, leading to enhanced cell viability and motility when transgenics were exposed to sunlight as the only energy source.
These results suggest that targeting PR to the thylakoid membrane using appropriate targeting sequences (e.g., nuclear-encoded, N-terminal, light harvesting complex signal sequences) and supplementation with exogenous retinal or retinal derived from β-carotene cleavage) could drive additional ATP synthesis. One concern is that the optical cross section of retinal is small and light harvesting by PR is not supplemented by antenna complexes. This constraint may be overcome in part by overexpressing PR in thylakoids. Regardless, the additional proton gradient necessary to support HLA3 activity is substantially less than that required to support overall CO2 fixation. The best achievable PR expression levels will be determined empirically using different gene promoters, e.g., psaD (SEQ ID NO:10), rbcs (SEQ ID NO:11), and cab1 (SEQ ID NO:7), to drive its expression.
Generation of Improved PR and its Functional Reconstitution in Chloroplasts
PR (AF279106),for example (SEQ ID NO:98),will be introduced into Arabidopsis, Camelina, and potato by Ti plasmid transformation and targeted to the thylakoid membrane using the DNAJ transit peptide (At5g21430, SEQ ID NO: 22) or psbX stop-transfer trans-membrane domain (At2g06520 SEQ ID NO:23) fused to the C-terminus of PR [58], or transit peptides from nuclear encoded chloroplast proteins such as CAB (SEQ ID NO:13), PGR5 (SEQ ID NO:14), and psaD (SEQ ID NO:15). Reconstitution with exogenous retinal will be carried out in a manner similar to strategies described for E. coli, except that retinal will be painted on the surface of the leaf [56] to demonstrate proof of concept. Retinal reconstitution will be followed by monitoring the absorption of the thylakoid membranes at 540 nm [59].
If exogenously applied retinal is not incorporated into PR, we will express low levels of a plant codon-optimized β-carotene monooxygenase for example (SEQ ID NO:100) in plastids to cleave a small fraction of β-carotene to generate retinal. Non-limiting examples of β-carotene monooxygenases that can be used include, for example, mouse, human, zebra fish, and rat enzymes (Accession Nos. AW044715, AK001592, AJ290390, and NM_053648, respectively). Alternatively, if β-carotene levels are severely depleted, we will transiently express β-carotene monooxygenase under the control of a transient inducible promoter such as an ethanol inducible gene promoter. This is available as an EcoRI/PstI fragment from Syngenta-Construct: pJL67-5S::AlcR/AlcA::GUS in pMLBART (Weigel World, Max Planck Institute for Developmental Biology, Tubingen, Germany) for periods of time sufficient to fully saturate PR [60,61]. Operation of a functional retinal photocycle in PR will be confirmed by transient absorption spectroscopy [62].
Alternatively, promoters such as the green tissue/leaf-specific promoters such as the CAB (At3g54890 SEQ ID NO:7) and rbcS (At5g38420 SEQ ID NO:11) promoters can be used, for example see SEQ ID NO:5 for the BCA protein with a rbc-1a transit peptide. As the skilled person will be well aware, various promoters may be used to promote the transcription of the nucleic acid of the invention, i.e. the nucleic acid which when transcribed yields an RNA molecule that modulates the expression and/or activity of a protein according to the invention. Such promoters include for example constitutive promoters, inducible promoters (e.g. light inducible promoters, stress-inducible promoters, drought-inducible promoters, hormone-inducible promoters, chemical-inducible promoters, etc.), tissue-specific promoters, developmentally regulated promoters and the like.
Thus, a plant expressible promoter can be a constitutive promoter, i.e. a promoter capable of directing high levels of expression in most cell types (in a spatio-temporal independent manner). Examples of plant expressible constitutive promoters include promoters of bacterial origin, such as the octopine synthase (OCS) and nopaline synthase (NOS) promoters from Agrobacterium, but also promoters of viral origin, such as that of the cauliflower mosaic virus (CaMV) 35S transcript (Hapster et al., 1988, Mol. Gen. Genet. 212: 182-190) or 19S RNAs genes (Odell et al., 1985, Nature. 6; 313(6005):810-2; U.S. Pat. No. 5,352,605; WO 84/02913; Benfey et al., 1989, EMBO J. 8:2195-2202), the enhanced 2×355 promoter (Kay at al., 1987, Science 236:1299-1302; Datla et al. (1993), Plant Sci 94:139-149) promoters of the cassava vein mosaic virus (CsVMV; WO 97/48819, U.S. Pat. No. 7,053,205), 2×CsVMV (WO2004/053135) the circovirus (AU 689 311) promoter, the sugarcane bacilliform badnavirus (ScBV) promoter (Samac et al., 2004, Transgenic Res. 13(4):349-61), the figwort mosaic virus (FMV) promoter (Sanger et al., 1990, Plant Mol Biol. 14(3):433-43), the subterranean clover virus promoter No 4 or No 7 (WO 96/06932) and the enhanced 35S promoter as described in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,164,316, 5,196,525, 5,322,938, 5,359,142 and 5,424,200. Among the promoters of plant origin, mention will be made of the promoters of the promoter of the Arabidopsis thaliana histone H4 gene (Chabouté et al., 1987), the ubiquitin promoters (Holtorf et al., 1995, Plant Mol. Biol. 29:637-649, U.S. Pat. No. 5,510,474) of Maize, Rice and sugarcane, the Rice actin 1 promoter (Act-1, U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,876), the histone promoters as described in EP 0 507 698 A1, the Maize alcohol dehydrogenase 1 promoter (Adh-1) (from the world wide web at patentlens.net/daisy/promoters/242.html)).
A variety of plant gene promoters that regulate gene expression in response to environmental, hormonal, chemical, developmental signals, and in a tissue-active manner can be used for expression of a sequence in plants. Choice of a promoter is based largely on the phenotype of interest and is determined by such factors as tissue (e.g., seed, fruit, root, pollen, vascular tissue, flower, carpel, etc.), inducibility (e.g., in response to heat, cold, drought, light etc.), timing, developmental stage, and the like.
Promoters that can be used to practice this invention include those that are green tissue specific such as the promoter of light harvesting complex protein 2 (Sakamoto et al. Plant Cell Physiology, 1991, 32(3): 385-393) or the promoter of the cytosolic fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase from rice (Si et al. Acta Botanica Sinica 45: 3(2003): 359-364). Alternative embodiments include light inducible promoters such as promoters of the plant ribulose-biscarboxylase/oxygenase (Rubisco) small subunit promoter (U.S. Pat. No. 4,962,028; WO99/25842) from Zea mays and sunflower. Also the small subunit promoter from Chrysanthemum may be used, combined or not combined with the use of the respective terminator (Outchkourov et al., Planta, 216: 1003-1012, 2003).
Additional promoters that can be used to practice this invention are those that elicit expression in response to stresses, such as the RD29 promoters that are activated in response to drought, low temperature, salt stress, or exposure to ABA (Yamaguchi-Shinozaki et al., 2004, Plant Cell, Vol. 6, 251-264; WO12/101118), but also promoters that are induced in response to heat (e.g., see Ainley et al. (1993) Plant Mol. Biol. 22: 13-23), light (e.g., the pea rbcS-3A promoter, Kuhlemeier et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 471-478, and the maize rbcS promoter, Schaffher and Sheen (1991) Plant Cell 3: 997-1012); wounding (e.g., wunl, Siebertz et al. (1989) Plant Cell 1: 961-968); pathogens (such as the PR-I promoter described in Buchel et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 40: 387-396, and the PDF 1.2 promoter described in Manners et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1071-1080), and chemicals such as methyl jasmonate or salicylic acid (e.g., see Gatz (1997) Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol. 48: 89-108). In addition, the timing of the expression can be controlled by using promoters such as those acting at senescence (e.g., see Gan and Amasino (1995) Science 270: 1986-1988); or late seed development (e.g., see Odell et al. (1994) Plant Physiol. 106: 447-458).
Use may also be made of salt-inducible promoters such as the salt-inducible NHX1 promoter of rice landrace Pokkali (PKN) (Jahan et al., 6th International Rice Genetics symposium, 2009, poster abstract P4-37), the salt inducible promoter of the vacuolar H+-pyrophosphatase from Thellungiella halophila (TsVP1) (Sun et al., BMC Plant Biology 2010, 10:90), the salt-inducible promoter of the Citrus sinensis gene encoding phospholipid hydroperoxide isoform gpxl (Avsian-Kretchmer et al., Plant Physiology July 2004 vol. 135, p 1685-1696).
In alternative embodiments, tissue-specific and/or developmental stage-specific promoters are used, e.g., promoter that can promote transcription only within a certain time frame of developmental stage within that tissue. See, e.g., Blazquez (1998) Plant Cell 10:791-800, characterizing the Arabidopsis LEAFY gene promoter. See also Cardon (1997) Plant J 12:367-77, describing the transcription factor SPL3, which recognizes a conserved sequence motif in the promoter region of the A. thaliana floral meristem identity gene API; and Mandel (1995) Plant Molecular Biology, Vol. 29, pp 995-1004, describing the meristem promoter eIF4. Tissue specific promoters which are active throughout the life cycle of a particular tissue can be used. Other promoters that can be used to express the nucleic acids of the invention include; a leaf-specific promoter (see, e.g., Busk (1997) Plant J. 11:1285 1295, describing a leaf-specific promoter in maize); a tomato promoter active during fruit ripening, senescence and abscission of leaves, a guard-cell preferential promoter e.g. as described in PCT/EP12/065608, and, to a lesser extent, of flowers can be used (see, e.g., Blume (1997) Plant J. 12:731 746); the Blec4 gene from pea, which is active in epidermal tissue of vegetative and floral shoot apices of transgenic alfalfa making it a useful tool to target the expression of foreign genes to the epidermal layer of actively growing shoots or fibers; the ovule-specific BELI gene (see, e.g., Reiser (1995) Cell 83:735-742, GenBank No. U39944); and/or, the promoter in Klee, U.S. Pat. No. 5,589,583, describing a plant promoter region is capable of conferring high levels of transcription in meristematic tissue and/or rapidly dividing cells. Further tissue specific promoters that may be used according to the invention include, promoters active in vascular tissue (e.g., see Ringli and Keller (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 37: 977-988), carpels (e.g., see Ohl et al. (1990) Plant Cell 2. In alternative embodiments, plant promoters which are inducible upon exposure to plant hormones, such as auxins, are used to express the nucleic acids used to practice the invention. For example, the invention can use the auxin-response elements El promoter fragment (AuxREs) in the soybean {Glycine max L.) (Liu (1997) Plant Physiol. 115:397-407); the auxin-responsive Arabidopsis GST6 promoter (also responsive to salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide) (Chen (1996) Plant J. 10: 955-966); the auxin-inducible parC promoter from tobacco (Sakai (1996) 37:906-913); a plant biotin response element (Streit (1997) Mol. Plant Microbe Interact. 10:933-937); and, the promoter responsive to the stress hormone abscisic acid (ABA) (Sheen (1996) Science 274:1900-1902). Further hormone inducible promoters that may be used include auxin-inducible promoters (such as that described in van der Kop et al. (1999) Plant Mol. Biol. 39: 979-990 or Baumann et al., (1999) Plant Cell 11: 323-334), cytokinin-inducible promoter (e.g., see Guevara-Garcia (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 743-753), promoters responsive to gibberellin (e.g., see Shi et al. (1998) Plant Mol. Biol. 38: 1053-1060, Willmott et al. (1998) Plant Molec. Biol. 38: 817-825) and the like.
In alternative embodiments, nucleic acids used to practice the invention can also be operably linked to plant promoters which are inducible upon exposure to chemicals reagents which can be applied to the plant, such as herbicides or antibiotics. For example, the maize In2-2 promoter, activated by benzenesulfonamide herbicide safeners, can be used (De Veylder (1997) Plant Cell Physiol. 38:568-577); application of different herbicide safeners induces distinct gene expression patterns, including expression in the root, hydathodes, and the shoot apical meristem. Coding sequence can be under the control of, e.g., a tetracycline-inducible promoter, e.g., as described with transgenic tobacco plants containing the Avena sativa L. (oat) arginine decarboxylase gene (Masgrau (1997) Plant J. 11:465-473); or, a salicylic acid-responsive element (Stange (1997) Plant J. 11:1315-1324). Using chemically—{e.g., hormone- or pesticide) induced promoters, i.e., promoter responsive to a chemical which can be applied to the transgenic plant in the field, expression of a polypeptide of the invention can be induced at a particular stage of development of the plant. Use may also be made of the estrogen-inducible expression system as described in U.S. Pat. No. 6,784,340 and Zuo et al. (2000, Plant J. 24: 265-273) to drive the expression of the nucleic acids used to practice the invention.
In alternative embodiments, a promoter may be used whose host range is limited to target plant species, such as corn, rice, barley, wheat, potato or other crops, inducible at any stage of development of the crop.
In alternative embodiments, a tissue-specific plant promoter may drive expression of operably linked sequences in tissues other than the target tissue. In alternative embodiments, a tissue-specific promoter that drives expression preferentially in the target tissue or cell type, but may also lead to some expression in other tissues as well, is used.
According to the invention, use may also be made, in combination with the promoter, of other regulatory sequences, which are located between the promoter and the coding sequence, such as transcription activators (“enhancers”), for instance the translation activator of the tobacco mosaic virus (TMV) described in Application WO 87/07644, or of the tobacco etch virus (TEV) described by Carrington & Freed 1990, J. Virol. 64: 1590-1597, for example.
Other regulatory sequences that enhance the expression of the nucleic acid of the invention may also be located within the chimeric gene. One example of such regulatory sequences is introns. Introns are intervening sequences present in the pre-mRNA but absent in the mature RNA following excision by a precise splicing mechanism. The ability of natural introns to enhance gene expression, a process referred to as intron-mediated enhancement (IME), has been known in various organisms, including mammals, insects, nematodes and plants (WO 07/098042, p 11-12). IME is generally described as a posttranscriptional mechanism leading to increased gene expression by stabilization of the transcript. The intron is required to be positioned between the promoter and the coding sequence in the normal orientation. However, some introns have also been described to affect translation, to function as promoters or as position and orientation independent transcriptional enhancers (Chaubet-Gigot et al., 2001, Plant Mol Biol. 45(1):17-30, p 27-28).
Examples of genes containing such introns include the 5′ introns from the rice actin 1 gene (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,641,876), the rice actin 2 gene, the maize sucrose synthase gene (Clancy and Hannah, 2002, Plant Physiol. 130(2):918-29), the maize alcohol dehydrogenase-1 (Adh-1) and Bronze-1 genes (Callis et al. 1987 Genes Dev. 1(10):1183-200; Mascarenhas et al. 1990, Plant Mol Biol. 15(6):913-20), the maize heat shock protein 70 gene (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,593,874), the maize shrunken 1 gene, the light sensitive 1 gene of Solanum tuberosum, and the heat shock protein 70 gene of Petunia hybrida (see U.S. Pat. No. 5,659,122), the replacement histone H3 gene from alfalfa (Keleman et al. 2002 Transgenic Res. 11(1):69-72) and either replacement histone H3 (histone H3.3-like) gene of Arabidopsis thaliana (Chaubet-Gigot et al., 2001, Plant Mol Biol. 45(1):17-30).
Other suitable regulatory sequences include 5′ UTRs. As used herein, a 5′ UTR, also referred to as a leader sequence, is a particular region of a messenger RNA (mRNA) located between the transcription start site and the start codon of the coding region. It is involved in mRNA stability and translation efficiency. For example, the 5′ untranslated leader of a petunia chlorophyll a/b binding protein gene downstream of the 35S transcription start site can be utilized to augment steady-state levels of reporter gene expression (Harpster et al., 1988, Mol Gen Genet. 212(1):182-90). WO95/006742 describes the use of 5′ non-translated leader sequences derived from genes coding for heat shock proteins to increase transgene expression.
The chimeric gene may also comprise a 3′ end region, i.e. a transcription termination or polyadenylation sequence, operable in plant cells. As a transcription termination or polyadenylation sequence, use may be made of any corresponding sequence of bacterial origin, such as for example the nos terminator of Agrobacterium tumefaciens, of viral origin, such as for example the CaMV 35S terminator, or of plant origin, such as for example a histone terminator as described in published Patent Application EP 0 633 317 A1. The polyadenylation region can be derived from the natural gene, from a variety of other plant genes, or from T-DNA. The 3′ end sequence to be added may be derived from, for example, the nopaline synthase or octopine synthase genes, or alternatively from another plant gene, or less preferably from any other eukaryotic gene.
The expression and targeting of proteorhodopsin to the thylakoid membranes will take advantage of the green energy spectrum that is inaccessible to chlorophyll. An increase in the amount of ATP is expected under photosynthesis conditions, from proton gradient generated both by the photosystems and the proteorhodopsin pump. Under conditions of inhibition of electron transfer through the photosystems, we should be able to observe a steady rate of ATP synthesis well above the basal rate through the activity of the proteorhodopsin proton pump.
Under normal pH conditions, protons are pumped into the bacterial periplasmic space by PR [50]. The photo-driven retinal cycle begins with photoisomerization of all trans-retinal to 13-cis retinal. The resulting conformational change poises the system for transfer of a proton from the Schiff base (SB; pKa 11) to the counter ion, Asp 97 (pKa ˜7.5). The proton is transferred to the lumen via a proton-conducting channel, and the SB is reprotonated from the cytoplasm. The mechanism of proton release in PR is not as well understood as in bacteriorhodopsin (BR); however, the main events of the photocycle are expected to be similar to those of BR. One potential challenge for pumping protons by PR in thylakoid membranes is the pH gradient-dependent reversibility of proton transfer by PR. At periplasmic pHs, <5.5, proton flow in PR is reversed, potentially depleting the proton gradient and impairing ATP synthesis. Thus, at the lumenal pH of thylakoids (4.5), reversed proton transduction via PR is possible. One of the critical residues involved in reversible proton flow is Asp97, which acts as the proton acceptor from retinal. The pKa of Asp97 in PR is ˜7.5, while the pKa of its counterpart in BR is ˜2.5. Due to the extremely low pKa of the counter ion, BR is able to retain its forward pumping activity at pHs as low as 3.5. The ability of PR to act as a proton pump in the thylakoid membrane thus entails maintaining the pumping efficiency at low pH conditions prevailing in the lumen. We propose that vectoral pumping of protons into the thylakoid lumen can be achieved by lowering the pKa of Asp97 and/or by protecting the SB from the lumenal pH through rational, site-specific mutagenesis. The electrostatic environment around the SB in PR is presumably maintained by the counter ions, Asp97, Asp227 (analogous to BR Asp212), Arg94 (analogous to BR Arg82) and His75. In BR, the low pKa of Asp85 is attributed to its strong hydrogen bonding interactions with Thr89 and Arg82 [53,54]. Since, interactions that reduce the pKa of Asp97 will promote proton-pumping activity at low external pH, mutation of Met79 to a residue that can hydrogen bond to His75 and Asp212, like Tyr or Thr, will be explored. These mutations are proposed by overlaying the structures of BR and PR, and identifying residues which are in a position to effect the desired behavior. Finally, the ability of a modified PR to work as an efficient H+ pump at acidic pHs will also entail shielding the SB from the extracellular environment. To this end, a L219E/T206S mutant will be generated, wherein E219 and S206 will form a Glu-Ser gate regulating vectoral proton transfer as occurs in BR.
To determine if any transgenes alter CET or ATP synthesis activity, we will compare the dark reduction kinetics of the photosystem I primary donor, P700+ in WT and transgenic plants, with and without dibromothymoquinone (DBMIB), an inhibitor of Cytb6f-mediated CET. Dark P700+ reduction kinetics are expected to be faster in plants with more active CET. In addition, we will assess the amplitude of the After Glow (AG) thermoluminescence band (˜40° C.) associated with CET activity [11,14,16,43,63]. Pool sizes of ATP will also be assessed in WT and transgenic plants by mass spectroscopy.
Referring now to
Referring now to
Macaca
fascicularis
Pan
troglodytes
Macaca
mulatta
Pongo
abelii
Callithrix
jacchus
Lemur
catta
Ailuropoda
melanoleuca
Equus
caballus
Canis
lupus
familiaris
Oryctolagus
cuniculus
Ailuropoda
melanoleuca
Sus
scrofa
Callithrix
jacchus
Mus
musculus
Bos
taurus
Oryctolagus
cuniculus
Rattus
norvegicus
Pongo
abelii
Pan
troglodytes
Callithrix
jacchus
Ailuropoda
melanoleuca
Canis
familiaris
Bos
taurus
Rattus
norvegicus
Oryctolagus
cuniculus
musculus
Monodelphis
domestic
Gallus
gallus
Taeniopygia
guttata
Pan
troglodytes
Macaca
mulatta
Oryctolagus
cuniculus
Ailuropoda
melanoleuca
Sus
scrofa
Callithrix
jacchus
Rattus
norvegicus
Mus
musculus
Canis
familiaris
Equus
caballus
Bos
taurus
Monodelphis
domestica
Ornith-
orhynchus
anatinus
gaattcATGTCtCATCAtTGGGGtTAtGGtAAACACAAtGGtCCTGAaCACTGGCATAAaGACT
Chlamydomonas reinhardtii
Chlamy-
domonas
reinhardtii
Volvox
carteri
f.
nagariensis
Chlorella
variabilis
Synechococcus
elongatus
Synechocystis
Nostoc sp.
Cyanothece
Microcysti
aeruginosa
Anabaena
variabills
Cyanothece
Arthrospia
platensis
Paraca
Chlamy-
domonas
reinhardtii
Volvox
carteri
f.
nagariensis
An exemplary optimized DNA sequence for the plasma membrane localized bicarbonate transporter is shown in SEQ ID NO. 91
An exemplary optimized DNA sequence for Chloroplast envelope localized Bicarbonate transporter is shown in SEQ ID NO: 92
Those skilled in the art will recognize, or be able to ascertain using no more than routine experimentation, many equivalents to the specific embodiments of the disclosure specifically described herein. For example a transgenic plant or alga of an embodiment disclosed herein further comprising within its genome, and expressing or overexpressing, a combination of heterologous nucleotide sequences encoding additionally a Rubisco (for example SEQ ID NO:107). Further still a transit peptide amino acid sequence at the amine terminal portion of a protein sequence identified herein may be cleaved leaving the protein sequence alone. The percent homology applies to the protein sequence without the transit peptide sequence also. Such equivalents are intended to be encompassed within the scope of the following claims.
Algal Research 1: 134-142.
Bot 64: 709-715.
Plant Journal 58: 220-234.
(INST-MFA) of autotrophic metabolism. Methods Mol Biol.
BMC Syst Biol 5: 129.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/917,028, titled “Improved Carbon Fixation Systems in Plants and Algae”, filed on Jun. 30, 2020, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 16/358,331, titled “Improved Carbon Fixation Systems in Plants and Algae”, filed on Mar. 3, 2019, and issued on Jun. 30, 2020 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,696,977, which is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 15/411,854, entitled “Improved Carbon Fixation Systems in Plants and Algae”, filed on Jan. 20, 2017, and issued on Mar. 3, 2019 as U.S. Pat. No. 10,233,458, which is a continuation of International Patent Application No. PCT/US2015/041617, entitled “Improved Carbon Fixation Systems in Plants and Algae”, filed on Jul. 22, 2015, which claims priority to and the benefit of the filing of U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 62/027,354, entitled “Carbon Fixation Systems in Plants and Algae”, filed on Jul. 22, 2014, and the specification and claims thereof are incorporated herein by reference.
This invention was made with government support under grants Nos. DOE-CECO Prime No: DE-AR0000202, Sub No: 21018-N; DOE-CABS Prime No: DE-SC0001295, Sub No: 21017-NM NSF EF-1219603, NSF No:1219603. The U.S. government has certain rights in the invention.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4554101 | Hopp | Nov 1985 | A |
| 5164316 | McPherson et al. | Nov 1992 | A |
| 5196525 | McPherson et al. | Mar 1993 | A |
| 5322938 | McPherson et al. | Jun 1994 | A |
| 5352605 | Fraley et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5359142 | McPherson et al. | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5424200 | McPherson et al. | Jun 1995 | A |
| 5510474 | Quail et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
| 5589583 | Klee et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5593874 | Brown et al. | Jan 1997 | A |
| 5599686 | Defeo-Jones et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5641876 | McElroy et al. | Jun 1997 | A |
| 5659122 | Austin | Aug 1997 | A |
| 6784340 | Aoyama et al. | Aug 2004 | B1 |
| 6989265 | Blattner et al. | Jan 2006 | B2 |
| 7053205 | Verdaguer et al. | May 2006 | B1 |
| 7303906 | Blattner et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
| 8039243 | Blattner | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8043842 | Blattner et al. | Oct 2011 | B2 |
| 8119365 | Blattner et al. | Feb 2012 | B2 |
| 8178339 | Campbell et al. | May 2012 | B2 |
| 10233458 | Sayre | Mar 2019 | B2 |
| 10696977 | Sayre | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 10696979 | Christensen et al. | Jun 2020 | B2 |
| 11001853 | Sayre | May 2021 | B2 |
| 20110256605 | Liphardt et al. | Oct 2011 | A1 |
| 20120219994 | Blattner et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
| 20130007916 | Spalding | Jan 2013 | A1 |
| 20190203222 | Sayre et al. | Jul 2019 | A1 |
| 20200347397 | Sayre et al. | Nov 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 0507698 | Oct 1992 | EP |
| 0633317 | Jan 1995 | EP |
| 1483367 | May 2010 | EP |
| 8402913 | Aug 1984 | WO |
| 87007644 | Dec 1987 | WO |
| 95006742 | Mar 1995 | WO |
| 9606932 | Mar 1996 | WO |
| 9748819 | Dec 1997 | WO |
| 2004053135 | Jun 2004 | WO |
| 07098042 | Aug 2007 | WO |
| 2012101118 | Aug 2012 | WO |
| 2012125737 | Sep 2012 | WO |
| 2017218959 | Dec 2017 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Blanco, N. et al., Plant Physiology (Feb. 2013) vol. 161, pp. 866-879. (Year: 2013). |
| Goldschmidt, Eliezer E., et al., “Regulation of Photosynthesis by End-Product Accumulation in Leaves of Plants Storing Starch, Sucrose, and Hexose Sugars”, Plant Physiol., vol. 99, 1992, 1443-1448. |
| Govindjee, Rajni , et al., “Arginine-82 Regulates the PKa of the Group Responsible for the Light-Driven Proton Release in Bacteriorhodopsin”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 71, 1996, 1011-1023. |
| Govindjee, Rajni , et al., “Mutation of a Surface Residue, Lysine-129, Reverses the Order of Proton Release and Uptake in Bacteriorhodopsin; Guanidine Hydrochloride Restores It”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 72, 1997, 886-898. |
| Govindjee, Rajni , et al., “The Quantum Efficiency of Proton Pumping by the Purple Membrane of Halobacterium Halobium”, Biophys. J., vol. 30, 1980, 231-242. |
| Guevara-Garcia, Arturo , et al., “A 42 bp fragment of the pmas10 promoter containing an ocs-like element confers a developmental, wound- and chemically inducible expression pattern”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 38, 1998, 743-753. |
| Hanke, Guy Thomas, et al., “Multiple iso-proteins of FNR in Arabidopsis : evidence for different contributions to chloroplast function and nitrogen assimilation”, Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 28, 2005, 1146-1157. |
| Harpster, Mark H., et al., “Relative strengths of the 35S califlower mosaic virus, 1′, 2′, and nopaline synthase promoters in transformed tobacco sugarbeet and oilseed rape callus tissue”, Mol Gen Genet, vol. 212, 1988, 182-190. |
| Hausler, Rainer E., “Overexpression of C4-cycle enzymes in transgenic C3 plants: a biotechnilogical approach to improve C3-photosynthesis”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 53, No. 369, 2002, 591-607. |
| Hay, R. K. M., et al., “Variation in the harvest index of tropical maize: evaluation of recent evidence from Mexico and Malawi”, Ann. appl. Biol., vol. 138, 2001, 103-109. |
| Henikoff, Steven , et al., “Amino acid substitution matrices from protein blocks”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 89, 1992, 10915-10919. |
| Henkes, Stefan , et al., “A Small Decrease of Plastid Transketolase Activity in Antisense Tobacco Transformants Has Dramatic Effects on Photosynthesis and Phenylpropanoid Metabolism”, The Plant Cell, vol. 13, 2001, 535-551. |
| Hertle, Alexander P., et al., “PGRL1 Is the Elusive Ferredoxin-Plastoquinone Reductase in Photosynthetic Cyclic Electron Flow”, Molecular Cell, vol. 49, 2013, 511-523. |
| Holtorf, Sonke , et al., “Comparison of different constitutive and inducible promoters for the overexpression of transgenes in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 29, 1995, 637-646. |
| Huege, Jan , et al., “GC-EI-TOF-MS analysis of in vivo carbon-partitioning into soluble metabolite pools of higher plants by monitoring isotope dilution after 13CO2 labelling”, Phytochemistry, vol. 68, 2007, 2258-2272. |
| Ihemere, Uzoma , “Genetic modification of cassava for enhanced starch production”, Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 4, 2006, 453-465. |
| Jazmin, Lara J., “Isotopically Nonstationary 13C Metabolic Flux Analysis”, Systems Metabolic Engineering: Methods and Protocols, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 985, Chapter 18, 2013, 367-390. |
| Jazmin, Lara J., “Isotopically Nonstationary MFA (INST-MFA) of Autotrophic Metabolism”, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1090, Chapter 12, 2014, 181-210. |
| Johnson, Giles N., “Physiology of PSI cyclic electron transport in higher plants”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1807, 2011, 384-389. |
| Joliot, Pierre , et al., “Regulation of cyclic and linear electron flow in higher plants”, PNAS, vol. 108, No. 32, 2011, 13317-13322. |
| Jonik, Claudia , et al., “Simultaneous boosting of source and sink capacities doubles tuber starch yield of potato plants”, Plant Biotechnology Journal, vol. 10, 2012, 1088-1098. |
| Karlin, Samuel , et al., “Applications and statistics for multiple high-scoring segments in molecular sequences”, Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA, vol. 90, 1993, 5873-5877. |
| Kay, Robert , et al., “Duplication of CaMV 35S promoter sequences creates a strong enhancer for plant genes”, Science, vol. 236, 1987, 1299-1302. |
| Kelemen, Zsolt , et al., “Transformation vector based on promoter and intron sequences of a replacement histone H3 gene. A tool for high, constitutive gene expression in plants”, Transgenic Research, vol. 11, 2002, 69-72. |
| Kim, Jaoon YH, et al., “Improved production of biohydrogen in lightpowered Escherichia coli by co-expression of proteorhodopsin and heterologous hydrogenase”, Microbial Cell Factories, vol. 11, No. 2, 2012, 1-7. |
| Kramer, David M., et al., “The Importance of Energy Balance in Improving Photosynthetic Productivity 1[W]”, Plant Physiology, vol. 155, 2011, 70-78. |
| Kuhlemeier, Cris , et al., “The Pea rbcS-3A Promoter Mediates Light Responsiveness but not Organ Specificity”, The Plant Cell, vol. 1, 1989, 471-478. |
| Kyte, Jack , “A simple method for displaying the hydropathic character of a protein”, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 157, No. 1, 1982, 105-132. |
| Lakatos, Melinda , et al., “The Photochemical Reaction Cycle of Proteorhodopsin at Low pH”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 84, 2003, 3252-3256. |
| Leamy, Alexandra , et al., “Modulating lipid fate controls lipotoxicity in palmitate-treated hepatic cells”, The FASEB Journal, vol. 27, No. 1, 2013, 1. |
| Leamy, Alexandra K., “Molecular mechanisms and the role of saturated fatty acids in the progression of non-alcoholic fatty liver disease”, Progress in Lipid Research, vol. 52, 2013, 165-174. |
| Lindqvist, Annika , et al., “Biochemical Properties of Purified Recombinand Human Beta-Carotene 15, 15′-Monooxygenase”, The Journal of Biological Chemistry, vol. 277, No. 26, 2002, 23942-23948. |
| Liu, Zhan-Bin , et al., “A G-Box-Binding Protein from Soybean Binds to the E1 Auxin-Response Element in the Soybean CH3 Promoter and Contains a Proline-Rich Repression Domain”, Plant Physiol., vol. 115, 1997, 397-407. |
| Lu, Chaofu , et al., “Generation of transgenic plants of a potential oilseed crop Camelina sativa by Agrobacterium-mediated transformation”, Plant Cell Rep, vol. 27, 2008, 273-278. |
| Ma, Fangfang , et al., “Isotopically nonstationary 13C flux analysis of changes in Arabidopsis thaliana leaf metabolism due to high light acclimation”, PNAS, vol. 111, No. 7, 2014, 16967-16972. |
| Mandel, Therese , et al., “Definition of constitutive gene expression in plants: the translation initiation factor 4A gene as a model”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 29, 1995, 995-1004. |
| Mandy, Dominic E., et al., “Metabolic flux analysis using 13C peptide label measurements”, The Plant Journal, vol. 77, 2014, 476-486. |
| Manners, John M., et al., “The promoter of the plant defensin gene PDF1.2 from Arabidopsis is systemically activated by fungal pathogens and responds to methyl jasmonate but not to salicylic acid”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 38, 1998, 1071-1080. |
| Martinez, A. , “Proterhodopsin photosystem gene expression enables photophosphorylation in a heterologous host”, PNAS, vol. 104, No. 13, 2007, 5590-5595. |
| Mascarenhas, Desmond , et al., “Intron-mediated enhancement of heterologous gene expression in maize”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 15, 1990, 913-920. |
| Masclaux-Daubresse, Celine , et al., “Exploring nitrogen remobilization for seed filling using natural variation in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 62, No. 6, 2011, 2131-2142. |
| Masgrau, Carles , et al., “Inducible overexpression of oat arginine decarboxylase in transgenic tobacco plants”, The Plant Journal, vol. 11, No. 3, 1997, 465-473. |
| McAtee, Allison G., et al., “Role of Chinese hamster ovary central carbon metabolism in controlling the quality of secreted biotherapeutic proteins”, Pharm. Bioprocess., vol. 2, No. 1, 2014, 63-74. |
| Minagawa, Jun , “State transitions—The molecular remodeling of photosynthetic supercomplexes that controls energy flow in the chloroplast”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1807, 2011, 897-905. |
| Miyagawa, Yoshiko , et al., “Overexpression of a cyanobacterial fructose-1,6-/sedoheptulose-1,7-bisphosphatase in tobacco enhances photosynthesis and growth”, Nature Biotechnology, vol. 19, 2001, 965-969. |
| Moroney, James V., et al., “Photorespiration and carbon concentrating mechanisms: two adaptations to high O2, low CO2 conditions”, Photosynth Res, vol. 117, 2013, 121-131. |
| Nakamura, Naoy , et al., “Promotion of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I during the evolution of NADP-malic enzyme-type C4 photosynthesis in the genus Flaveria”, New Phytologist, vol. 199, 2013, 832-842. |
| Odell, Joan T., et al., “Identification of DNA sequences required for activity of the cauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter”, Nature, vol. 313, No. 6005, 1985, 810-812. |
| Odell, Joan T., “Seed-Specific Gene Activation Mediated by the Cre/lox Site-Specif ic Recombination System”, Plant Physiol., vol. 106, 1994, 447-458. |
| Okutani, Satoshi , “Three Maize Leaf Ferredoxin:NADPH Oxidoreductases Vary in Subchloroplast Location, Expression, and Interaction with Ferredoxin”, Plant Physiology, vol. 139, 2005, 1451-1459. |
| Outchkourov, N. S., et al., “The promoter-terminator of chrysanthemum rbcS1 directs very high expression levels in plants”, Planta, vol. 216, 2003, 1003-1012. |
| Young, Jamey D., et al., “An Elementary Metabolite Unit (EMU) Based Method of Isotopically Nonstationary Flux Analysis”, Biotechnology and Bioengineering, vol. 99, No. 3, 2008, 686-699. |
| Young, Jamey D., “INCA: a computational platform for isotopically non-stationary metabolic flux analysis”, Bioinformatics, vol. 30, No. 9, 2014, 1333-1335. |
| Young, Jamey D., et al., “Isotopomer Measurement Techniques in Metabolic Flux Analysis II: Mass Spectrometry”, Methods in Molecular Biology, vol. 1083, Chapter 7, 2014, 85-108. |
| Young, Jamey D., “Mapping photoautotrophic metabolism with isotopically nonstationary 13C flux analysis”, Metabolic Engineering, vol. 13, 2011, 656-665. |
| Young, Jamey D., “Metabolic flux rewiring in mammalian cell cultures”, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 24, 2013, 1108-1115. |
| Zhu, Xin-Guang , et al., “C4 Rice—an Ideal Arena for Systems Biology Research”, Journal of Integrative Plant Biology, vol. 52, Issue 8, 2010, 762-770. |
| Zuo, Jianru , et al., “An estrogen receptor-based transactivator XVE mediates highly inducible gene expression in transgenic plants”, The Plant Journal, vol. 24, No. 2, 2000, 265-273. |
| Ainley, W. Michael, et al., “Regulatable endogenous production of cytokinins up to ‘toxic’ levels in transgenic plants and plant tissues”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 22, 1993, 13-23. |
| Allen, Doug K., et al., “Carbon and Nitrogen Provisions Alter the Metabolic Flux in Developing Soybean Embryos”, Plant Physiology, vol. 161, 2013, 1458-1475. |
| Allen, Doug K., et al., “Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement”, Phytochemistry, vol. 68, 2007, 2197-2210. |
| Allen, Doug K., et al., “Isotope labelling of Rubisco subunits provides in vivo information on subcellular biosynthesis and exchange of amino acids between compartments”, Plant, Cell and Environment, Vo. 35, 2012, 1232-1244. |
| Allen, Doug K., et al., “Metabolic flux analysis in plants: coping with complexity”, Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 32, 2009, 1241-1257. |
| Allen, Doug K., et al., “Quantification of Peptide m/z Distributions from 13C-Labeled Cultures with High-Resolution Mass Spectrometry”, Anal. Chem., vol. 86, 2014, 1894-1901. |
| Allen, Doug K., et al., “The role of light in soybean seed filling metabolism”, The Plant Journal, vol. 58, 2009, 220-234. |
| Alric, Jean , “Cyclic electron flow around photosystem I in unicellular green algae”, Photosynth Res, vol. 106, 2010, 47-56. |
| Altschul, Stephen F., et al., “Basic Local Alignment Search Tool”, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 215, 1990, 403-410. |
| Altschul, Stephen F., et al., “Gapped BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein database search programs”, Nucleic Acids Research, vol. 25, No. 17, 1997, 3389-3402. |
| Amunts, Alexey , et al., “The structure of a plant photosystem I supercomplex at 3.4A resolution”, Nature, vol. 447, 2007, 58-63. |
| Arrivault, Stephanie , “Use of reverse-phase liquid chromatography, linked to tandem mass spectrometry, to profile the Calvin cycle and other metabolic intermediates in Arabidopsis rosettes at different carbon dioxide concentrations”, The Plant Journal, vol. 59, 2009, 824-839. |
| Avsian-Kretchmer, Orna , et al., “The Salt-Stress Signal Transduction Pathway That Activates the gpx1 Promoter Is Mediated by Intracellular H2O2, Different from the Pathway Induced by Extracellular H2O2”, Plant Physiology, vol. 135, 2004, 1685-1696. |
| Baumann, Kim , et al., “The DNA Binding Site of the Dof Protein NtBBF1 Is Essential for Tissue-Specific and Auxin-Regulated Expression of the rolB Oncogene in Plants”, The Plant Cell, vol. 11, 1999, 323-333. |
| Beja, Oded , et al., “Bacterial Rhodopsin: Evidence for a New Type of Phototrophy in the Sea”, Science, vol. 289, 2000, 1902-1906. |
| Benfey, Philip N., et al., “The CaMV 35S enhancer contains at least two domains which can confer different developmental and tissuespecific expression patterns”, The EMBO Journal, vol. 8, No. 8, 1989, 2195-2202. |
| Bihmidine, Saadia , et al., “Regulation of assimilate import into sink organs: update on molecular drivers of sink strength”, Frontiers in Plant Science, vol. 4, Issue 177, 2013, 1-15. |
| Blanco, Nicolas E., et al., “Expression of the Minor Isoform Pea Ferredoxin in Tabacco Alters Photosynthetic Electron Partitioning and Enhances Cyclic Eletrcon Flow”, Plant Physiology, vol. 161, 2013, 866-879. |
| Blankenship, Robert E., “Comparing Photosynthetic and Photovoltaic Efficiencies and Recognizing the Potential for Improvement”, Science, vol. 332, 2011, 805-809. |
| Blázquez, Miguel A., et al., “Gibberellins Promote Flowering of Arabidopsis by Activating the LEAFY Promoter”, The Plant Cell, vol. 10, 1998, 791-800. |
| Blume, Beatrix , et al., “Expression of ACC oxidase promoter-GUS fusions in tomato and Nicotiana plumbaginifolia regulated by developmental and environmental stimuli”, The Plant Journal, vol. 12, No. 4, 1997, 731-746. |
| Breyton, Cecile , et al., “Redox Modulation of Cyclic Electron Flow around Photosystem I in C3 Plants”, Biochemistry, vol. 45, 2006, 13465-13475. |
| Buchel, Annemarie , et al., “Mutation of GT-1 binding sites in the Pr-1A promoter influences the level of inducible gene expression in vivo”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 40, No. 3, 1999, 387-396. |
| Busch, Karin B., et al., “Dynamics of bioenergetic microcompartments”, Biol. Chem., vol. 394, No. 2, 2013, 163-188. |
| Busk, Peter Kamp, et al., “Regulatory elements in vivo in the promoter of the abscisic acid responsive gene rab17 from maize”, The Plant Journal, vol. 11, No. 6, 1997, 1285-1295. |
| Callis, Judy , et al., “Introns increase gene expression in cultured maize cells”, Genes & Development, vol. 1, 1987, 1183-1200. |
| Cao, Yi , et al., “Relationship of Proton Release at the Extracellular Surface to Deprotonation of the Schiff Base in the Bacteriorhodopsin Photocycle”, Biophysical Journal, vol. 68, 1995, 1518-1530. |
| Cardol, Pierre , et al., “Regulation of electron transport in microalgae”, Biochimica et Biophysica Acta, vol. 1807, 2011, 912-918. |
| Cardon, Guillermo H., et al., “Functional analyis of the Arabidopsis thaliana SBP-box gene SPL3: a novel gene involved in the floral transition”, The Plant Journal, vol. 12, No. 2, 1997, 367-377. |
| Carrillo, Humberto , et al., “The Multiple Sequence Alignment Problem in Biology”, SIAM Journal on Applied Mathematics, vol. 48, No. 5, 1988, 1073-1082. |
| Carrington, James C., et al., “Cap-Independent Enhancement of Translation by a Plant Potyvirus 5′ Nontranslated Region”, Journal of Virology, vol. 64, No. 4, 1990, 1590-1597. |
| Chaubet-Gigot, Nicole , et al., “Tissue-dependent enhancement of transgene expression by introns of replacement histone H3 genes of Arabidopsis”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 45, 2001, 17-30. |
| Chen, Wenqiong , et al., “The promoter of a H2O2-inducible, Arabidopsis glutathione S-transferase gene contains closely closely linked OBF- and OBP1-binding sites”, The Plant Journal, vol. 10, No. 6, 1996, 955-966. |
| Choi, Jungik , et al., “Tandem massspectrometry: Anovelapproachformetabolicfluxanalysis”, Metabolic Engineering, vol. 13, 2011, 225-233. |
| Clancy, Maureen , et al., “Splicing of the Maize Sh1 First Intron Is Essential for Enhancement of Gene Expression, and a T-Rich Motif Increases Expression without Affecting Splicing”, Plant Physiol. vol. 130, 2002, 918-929. |
| Claverie, Jean-Michel , “Information Enhancement Methods for Large Scale Sequence Analysis”, Computers Che., vol. 17, No. 2, 1993, 191-201. |
| Dalcorso, Giovanni , et al., “A Complex Containing PGRL1 and PGR5 Is Involved in the Switch Between Linear and Cyclic Electron Flow in Arabidopsis”, Cell 132, 2008, 273-285. |
| Datla, Raju S.S., et al., “Improved high-level constitutive foreign gene expression in plants using an AMV RNA4 untranslated leader sequence”, Plant Science, vol. 94, 1993, 139-149. |
| De Veylder, Lieven , et al., “Herbicide Safener-Inducible Gene Expression in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Plant Cell Physiol., vol. 38, No. 5, 1997, 568-577. |
| Dioumaev, Andrei K., et al., “Proton Transfers in the Photochemical Reaction Cycle of Proteorhodopsin”, Biochemistry, vol. 41, 5348-5358, 2002. |
| Duanmu, Deqiang , et al., “Knockdown of limiting-CO2-induced gene HLA3 decreases HCO3 transport and photosynthetic Ci affinity in Chlamydomonas reinhardtii”, PNAS, vol. 106, No. 14, 2009, 5990-5995. |
| Duckwall, Casey Scott, et al., “Mapping cancer cell metabolism with 13C flux analysis: Recent progress and future challenges”, Journal of Carcinogenesis, vol. 12, No. 13, 2013, 1-7. |
| Egnatchik, R. A., et al., “Palmitate-induced activation of mitochondrial metabolism promotes oxidative stress and apoptosis in H4IIEC3 rat hepatocytes”, Metabolism, vol. 62, No. 2, 2014, 283-295. |
| Elleby, Bjorn , et al., “Characterization of carbonic anhydrase from Neisseria gonorrhoeae”, Eur. J. Biochem, vol. 268, 2001, 1613-1619. |
| Fabre, Nicolas , et al., “Characterization and expression analysis of genes encoding a and b carbonic anhydrases in Arabidopsis”, Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 30, 2007, 617-629. |
| Farquhar, G. D., et al., “Carbon Isotope Discrimination and Photosynthesis”, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 40, 1989, 503-537. |
| Friedrich, Thomas , et al., “Proteorhodopsin is a Light-driven Proton Pump with Variable Vectoriality”, J. Mol. Biol., vol. 321, 2002, 821-838. |
| Froehlich, John E., et al., “The role of the transmembrane domain in determining the targeting of membrane proteins to either the inner envelope or thylakoid membrane”, The Plant Journal, vol. 68, 2011, 844-856. |
| Furbank, Robert T., et al., “C4 rice: a challenge for plant phenomics”, Functional Plant Biology, vol. 36, No. 11, 2009, 845-856. |
| Gatz, C. , et al., “Chemical Control of Gene Expression”, Annu. Rev. Plant Physiol. Plant Mol. Biol., vol. 48, 1997, 89-108. |
| Parry, Martin A.J., et al., “Rubisco activity and regulation as targets for crop improvement”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 64, No. 3, 2013, 717-730. |
| Paul, Matthew J., et al., “Sink regulation of photosynthesis”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 52, No. 360, 2001, 1383-1400. |
| Peltier, Gilles , “Auxiliary electron transport pathways in chloroplasts of microalgae”, Photosynth Res, vol. 106, 2010, 19-31. |
| Peng, Lianwei , et al., “Supercomplex Formation with Photosystem I Is Required for the Stabilization of the Chloroplast NADH Dehydrogenase-Like Complex in Arabidopsis”, Plant Physiology, vol. 155, 2011, 1629-1639. |
| Perrine, Zoee , et al., “Optimization of photosynthetic light energy utilization by microalgae”, Algal Research, vol. 1, 2012, 134-142. |
| Peterhansel, Christoph , et al., “Photorespiratory bypasses: how can they work?”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 64, No. 3, 2013, 709-715. |
| Price, G. Dean, et al., “The cyanobacterial CCM as a source of genes for improving photosynthetic CO2 fixation in crop species”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 64, No. 3, 2013, 753-768. |
| Reeck, Gerald R., et al., ““Homology” in Proteins and Nucleic Acids: A Terminology Muddle and a Way out of It”, Cell, vol. 50, 1987, 667. |
| Reiser, Leonore , et al., “The BELL7 Gene Encodes a Homeodomain Protein Involved in Pattern Formation in the Arabidopsis Ovule Primordium”, Cell, vol. 83, 1995, 735-742. |
| Ringli, Christoph , et al., “Specific interaction of the tomato bZIP transcription factor VSF-1 with a non-palindromic DNA sequence that controls vascular gene expression”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 37, 1998, 977-988. |
| Romisch-Margl, Werner , et al., “13CO2 as a universal metabolic tracer in isotopologue perturbation experiments”, Phytochemistry, vol. 68, 2007, 2273-2289. |
| Roslan, Hairul A., et al., “Characterization of the ethanol-inducible alce geneexpression system in Arabidopsis thaliana”, The Plant Journal, vol. 28, No. 2, 2001, 225-235. |
| Sage, Tammy L., et al., “The Functional Anatomy of Rice Leaves: Implications for Refixation of Photorespiratory CO2 and Efforts to Engineer C4 Photosynthesis into Rice”, Plant Cell Physiol. vol. 50, No. 4, 2009, 756-772. |
| Sage, Rowan F., “Variation in the Kcat of Rubisco in C3 and C4 plants and some implications for photosynthetic performance at high and low temperature”, Journal of Experimental Botany, vol. 53, No. 369, 2002, 609-620. |
| Sakai, Tatsuya , et al., “Analysis of the Promoter of the Auxin-Inducible Gene, parC, of Tobacco”, Plant Cell Physiol., vol. 37, No. 7, 1996, 906-913. |
| Sakamoto, Masahiro , et al., “Structure and Characterization of a Gene for Light-Harvesting Chi a/b Binding Protein from Rice”, Plant Cell Physiol., vol. 32, No. 3, 1991, 385-393. |
| Samac, Deborah A., et al., “A comparison of constitutive promoters for expression of transgenes in alfalfa (Medicago sativa)”, Transgenic Research, vol. 13, 2004, 349-361. |
| Sanger, Margaret , et al., “Characteristics of a strong promoter from figwort mosaic virus: comparison with the analogous 35S promoter from cauliflower mosaic virus and the regulated mannopine synthase promoter”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 14, 1990, 433-443. |
| Schaffner, Anton R., et al., “Maize rbcS Promoter Activity Depends on Sequence Elements Not Found in Dicot rbcS Promoters”, Ihe Plant Cell, vol. 3, 1991, 997-1012. |
| Sekiyama, Yasuyo , et al., “Towards dynamic metabolic network measurements by multi-dimensional NMR-based fluxomics”, Phytochemistry, vol. 68, 2007, 2320-2329. |
| Shastri, Avantika A., et al., “A transient isotopic labeling methodology for 13C metabolic flux analysis of photoautotrophic microorganisms”, Phytochemistry, vol. 68, 2007, 2302-2312. |
| Sheen, Jen , “Ca2+-dependent protein kinases and stress signal transduction in plants”, Science, vol. 274, No. 5294, 1996, 1900-1902. |
| Shi, Rebecca , et al., “Engineering Oryza sativa to Express the Photeorhodopsin Photosystem”, http://openwetware.org/wiki/20.109(F12):Mod3_OrangeTR_Pre-proposal, 2012, 1-4. |
| Shi, Lifang , et al., “Gibberellin and abscisic acid regulate GAST1 expression at the level of transcription”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 38, 1998, 1053-1060. |
| Shikanai, Toshiharu , “Central role of cyclic electron transport around photosystem I in the regulation of photosynthesis”, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 26, 2014, 25-30. |
| Si, Li-Zhen , et al., “Isolation of a 1 195 bp 5-Flanking Region of Rice Cytosolic Fructose-1, 6-bisphosphatase and Analysis of Its Expression in Transgenic Rice”, Acta Botanica Sinica, vol. 3, 2003, 359-364. |
| Siebertz, Barbara , et al., “cis-Analysis of the Wound-Inducible Promoter wun7 in Transgenic Tobacco Plants and Histochemical Localization of Its Expression”, The Plant Cell, vol. 1, 1989, 961-968. |
| Sinclair, Thomas R., “Historical Changes in Harvest Index and Crop Nitrogen Accumulation”, Crop Science, vol. 38, No. 3, 1998, 638-643. |
| Slewinski, Thomas L., et al., “Current perspectives on the regulation of whole-plant carbohydrate partitioning”, Plant Science, vol. 178, 2010, 341-349. |
| Sonnewald, U. , “Mianipulation of sink-source relations in transgenic plants”, Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 17, 1994, 649-658. |
| Sonnewald, Uwe , et al., “Molecular Approaches to Sink-Source Interactions”, Plant Physiol., vol. 99, 1992, 1267-1270. |
| Srour, Orr , et al., “Fluxomers: a new approach for 13C metabolic flux analysis”, BMC Systems Biology, vol. 5, No. 129, 2011, 1-15. |
| Stange, Claudia , et al., “Phosphorylation of nuclear proteins directs binding to salicylic acid-responsive elements”, The Plant Journal, vol. 11, No. 6, 1997, 1315-1324. |
| Streit, Wolfgang R., et al., “A Biotin-Regulated Locus, bioS, in a Possible Survival Operon of Rhizobium meliloti”, MPMI vol. 10, No. 7, 1997, 933-937. |
| Subramanian, Sowmya , “Comparative energetics and kinetics of autotrophic lipid and starch metabolism in chlorophytic microalgae: implications for biomass and biofuel production”, Biotechnology for Biofuels, vol. 6, No. 150, 2013, 1-12. |
| Suorsa, Marjaana , et al., “PGR5-PGRL1-Dependent Cyclic Electron Transport Modulations Linear Electron Transport Rate in Arabidopsis thaliana”, Molecular Plant, vol. 9, 2016, 271-288. |
| Sweetlove, L. J., et al., “Source metabolism dominates the control of source to sink carbon flux in tuberizing potato plants throughout the diurnal cycle and under a range of environmental conditions”, Plant, Cell and Environment, vol. 23, 2000, 523-529. |
| Szecowka, Marek , et al., “Metabolic Fluxes in an Illuminated Arabidopsis rosette”, The Plant Cell, vol. 25, 2013, 394-714. |
| Takahashi, Hiroko , et al., “Cyclic electron flow is redox-controlled but independent of state transition”, Nature Communication, vol. 4, No. 1954, 2013, 1-8. |
| Van Der Kop, Dianne A.M., et al., “Selection of Arabidopsis mutants overexpressing genes driven by the promoter of an auxin-inducible glutathione S-transferase gene”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 39, 1999, 970-990. |
| Victorio, Reynaldo G., et al., “Growth, Partitioning, and Harvest Index of Tuber-Bearing Solanum Genotypes Grown in Two Contrasting Peruvian Environments”, Plant Physiol., vol. 82, 1986, 103-108. |
| Vos, J. , “The nitrogen response of potato (Solanum tuberosum L.) in the field: nitrogen uptake and yield, harvest index and nitrogen concentration.”, Potato Research, vol. 40, 1997, 237-248. |
| Walter, Jessica M., et al., “Light-powering Escherichia coli with proteorhodopsin”, PNAS, vol. 104, No. 7, 2007, 2408-2412. |
| Walter, Jessica M., et al., “Potential of light-harvesting proton pumps for bioenergy applications”, Current Opinion in Biotechnology, vol. 21, 2010, 265-270. |
| Wang, Yingjun , et al., “Carbon dioxide concentrating mechanism in Chlamydomonas reinhardtyy: inorganic carbon transport and CO2 recapture”, Photosynth Res, vol. 109, 2011, 115-122. |
| Weber, Andreas PM, et al., “Plastid transport and metabolism of C3 and C4 plants—comparative analysis and possible biotechnological exploitation”, Current Opinion in Plant Biology, vol. 13, 2010, 257-265. |
| Willmott, Ruth L., et al., “DNase1 footprints suggest the involvement of at least three types of transcription factors in the regulation of alpha-Amy2/A by gibberellin”, Plant Molecular Biology, vol. 38, 1998, 817-825. |
| Wootton, John C., et al., “Statistics of Local Complexity in Amino Acid Sequences and Sequence Databases”, Computers Chem. vol. 17, No. 2, 1993, 149-163. |
| Wunsche, Jens N., et al., “Physiological and biochemical leaf and tree responses to crop load in apple”, Tree Physiology, vol. 25, 2005, 1253-1263. |
| Yamaguchi-Shinozaki, Kazuko , et al., “A Novel cis-Acting Element in an Arabidopsis Gene 1s Involved in Responsiveness to Drought, Lowqemperature, or High-Salt Stress”, The Plant Cell, vol. 6, 1994, 251-264. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20220042031 A1 | Feb 2022 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 62027354 | Jul 2014 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 16917028 | Jun 2020 | US |
| Child | 17317362 | US | |
| Parent | 16358331 | Mar 2019 | US |
| Child | 16917028 | US | |
| Parent | 15411854 | Jan 2017 | US |
| Child | 16358331 | US | |
| Parent | PCT/US2015/041617 | Jul 2015 | US |
| Child | 15411854 | US |
