Carbon foam particulates and methods of using carbon foam particulates in subterranean applications

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 7299869
  • Patent Number
    7,299,869
  • Date Filed
    Friday, September 3, 2004
    21 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, November 27, 2007
    17 years ago
Abstract
The present invention relates to carbon foam particulates and their use in subterranean applications such as production enhancement and completion. One embodiment of the present invention provides a method of treating a subterranean formation using a servicing fluid comprising providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates; and, placing the slurry into a portion of a subterranean formation. Another embodiment of the present invention provides a particulate suitable for use as proppant or gravel in a subterranean application comprising a foamed, cellular structure.
Description
BACKGROUND

The present invention relates to improved particulates and methods of using such particulates in subterranean applications. More particularly, the present invention relates to high strength carbon foam particulates and their use in subterranean applications such as production enhancement and completion.


Particulates are used in a variety of operations and treatments performed in oil and gas wells. Such operations and treatments include, but are not limited to, production stimulation operations such as fracturing and well completion operations such as gravel packing and combinations operations such as frac-packing.


An example of a production stimulation operation using particulates is hydraulic fracturing. That is, a type of servicing fluid, referred to in the art as a fracturing fluid, is pumped through a well bore into a subterranean zone to be stimulated at a rate and pressure such that fractures are formed and extended into the subterranean zone. The fracture or fractures may be horizontal or vertical, with the latter usually predominating, and with the tendency toward vertical fractures increasing with the depth of the formation being fractured. The fracturing fluid is generally a gel, emulsion, or foam that comprises a particulate material often referred to as proppant. The proppant is deposited in the fracture and functions, inter alia, to hold the fracture open while maintaining conductive channels through which such produced fluids can flow upon completion of the fracturing treatment and release of the attendant hydraulic pressure.


An example of a well completion operation using particulates is gravel packing. Gravel packing treatments are used, inter alia, to reduce the migration of unconsolidated formation particulates into the well bore. In gravel packing operations, particles referred to in the art as gravel are carried to a well bore in a subterranean producing zone by a hydrocarbon or water carrier fluid. That is, the particulates are suspended in a carrier fluid, which may be viscosified, and the carrier fluid is pumped into a well bore in which the gravel pack is to be placed. As the particulates are placed in the zone, the carrier fluid leaks off into the subterranean zone and/or is returned to the surface. The resultant gravel pack acts as a filter to separate formation solids from produced fluids while permitting the produced fluids to flow into and through the well bore. While screenless gravel packing operations are becoming more common, traditional gravel pack operations involve placing a gravel pack screen in the well bore and packing the surrounding annulus between the screen and the well bore with gravel sized to prevent the passage of formation particulates through the pack with produced fluids. The gravel pack screen is generally a filter assembly used to support and retain the gravel placed during the gravel pack operation. A wide range of sizes and screen configurations are available to suit the characteristics of a well bore, the production fluid, and any particulates in the subterranean formation. When installing the gravel pack, the gravel is carried to the formation in the form of a slurry by mixing the gravel with a viscosified carrier fluid. Once the gravel is placed in the well bore, the viscosity of the carrier fluid is reduced and it is returned to the surface. Such gravel packs are used to stabilize the formation while causing minimal impairment to well productivity. The gravel, inter alia, acts to the prevent the particulates from occluding the screen or migrating with the produced fluids, and the screen, inter alia, acts to prevent the gravel from entering the well bore.


In some situations the processes of hydraulic fracturing and gravel packing are combined into a single treatment to provide a stimulated production and an annular gravel pack to prevent formation sand production. Such treatments are often referred to as “frac pack” operations. In some cases the treatments are completed with a gravel pack screen assembly in place with the hydraulic fracturing treatment being pumped through the annular space between the casing and screen. In this situation the hydraulic fracturing treatment ends in a screen out condition creating an annular gravel pack between the screen and casing. This allows both the hydraulic fracturing treatment and gravel pack to be placed in a single operation. In other cases the fracturing treatment may be performed prior to installing the screen and placing a gravel pack.


Fracturing fluids, gravel packing carrier fluids and frac pack fluids generally must be highly viscous to be able to suspend particulates. To achieve a high viscosity, viscosifiers often are added to such fluids. Such viscosifiers are expensive. Moreover, as a fracture or a gravel pack is created a portion of the liquid contained in the fluid may leak off into the formation and/or may create an undesirable filter cake comprising deposited viscosifier on the walls of the fracture, well bore, or the formation.


Filter cakes are sometimes desirable to aid in preventing drilling and other servicing fluids from being lost in the formation and to prevent solids from entering the porosities of the producing formation. However, just as a filter cake may block the loss of fluids into the formation, the same filter cake may block the production of fluids from the formation. Thus, the presence of a filter cake on a producing zone is generally undesirable when a subterranean formation is returned to production. Moreover, residue of viscosifiers used in subterranean applications often remains on the particulates transported in the viscosified fluid and may reduce the conductivity of packs made from such particulates.


Also, as more wells are being drilled in deep water and in high temperature zones, gravel packing in long open horizontal well bores is becoming more prevalent. Completion operations in these wells generally involve the use of reduced-specific gravity particulates that are resistant to degradation in the presence of hostile conditions such as high temperatures and subterranean treatment chemicals. In order to prevent damage to these producing zones by gravel packing operations, the treating fluid carrying the particles should generally exhibit a relatively low viscosity by using low concentrations of gel polymers. Similarly, fracture stimulation treatments carried out in deep, high temperature wells may require similar reduced-specific gravity particles suspending in lower viscosity fluids.


Traditional high-strength particulates used in subterranean applications often exhibit too high of a specific gravity to be suspended in such lower viscosity fluids. While low specific gravity particulates, such as walnut hulls are well known in the art, generally they are not able to withstand significant closure stresses over time at elevated subterranean temperatures. Similarly, a variety of lightweight particles formed of thermoplastic materials including polyolefins, polystyrene divinylbenzene, polyfluorocarbons, polyethers, etherketones, and polyamide imides are commercially available. However, when these particles are exposed to temperatures above about 150° F., they soften and deform, and are not suitable in all well bores.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention relates to improved particulates and methods of using such particulates in subterranean applications. More particularly, the present invention relates to carbon foam particulates and their use in subterranean applications such as production enhancement and completion.


One embodiment of the present invention provides a method of treating a subterranean formation using a servicing fluid comprising providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates; and, placing the slurry into a portion of a subterranean formation.


Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of forming a proppant pack in a portion of a subterranean formation using a servicing fluid comprising providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates; and, placing the slurry into at least one fracture in a subterranean formation; and, depositing at least a portion of the open-cell carbon foam particulates in at least a portion of the fracture so as to form a particulate pack.


Another embodiment of the present invention provides a method of gravel packing comprising providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates; placing the slurry in a region of a well bore such that at least a portion of the carbon foam particulates form a gravel pack substantially adjacent to the well bore.


Another embodiment of the present invention provides a particulate suitable for use as proppant or gravel in a subterranean application comprising a foamed, cellular structure.


Other and further features and advantages of the present invention will be readily apparent to those skilled in the art upon a reading of the description of preferred embodiments which follows.







DESCRIPTION OF PREFERRED EMBODIMENTS

The present invention relates to improved particulates and methods of using such particulates in subterranean applications. More particularly, the present invention relates to open-cell carbon foam particulates and their use in subterranean applications such as production enhancement and completion.


The carbon foam particulates of the present invention comprise open-cell carbon foam particulates. The particulates of the present invention preferably have low specific gravities, preferably below about 2. The particulates of the present invention generally can withstand crush strengths of at least about 500 psi; certain embodiments may withstand crush strength of 6,000 psi or more. In some embodiments, the crush strength a particulate of the present invention can withstand may be increased by coating the particulate with a material capable of adding strength, such embodiments are described in more detail below. The physical properties of such foam pellets (such as specific gravity and crush strength) may be controlled in part by controlling the mean pore diameters of the foam cells and the specific surface area of the pellets. As the percentage and size of foam cells in the particulate increases, its specific gravity will decrease and its crush strength will decrease. By controlling the percentage and size of foam cells in the particulate it is possible to tailor a proppant for the specific gravity and crush strength needed in a particular application.


Cellular materials are the most efficient structure for many applications from the perspective of the ratio of such material's weight to strength. Cellular material are one of the most common structures found naturally in load bearing applications, such as in bone and wood formation. The use of cellular materials allows modifications to obtain the simultaneous combination of stiffness and strength in response to overall weight. Techniques now exist for fabricating foams not only of polymers, but of metals, ceramics, and glasses. These newer foams are increasingly being used structurally, for insulation, and in systems for absorbing the kinetic energy of impacts. Their uses exploit the unique combination of properties offered by cellular solids, properties that ultimately derive from the cellular structure of the material.


Proppant particulates prepared from foamed, cellular structures may be derived from several techniques that are used to produce engineering structural foams. Some such materials may be produced using a foamed polymer as the starting material. The particulate structure can be obtained by spraying or atomizing a foaming agent, or may be obtained by cutting or grinding of an existing solid foamed substance to a desirable granule size. From these precursors, processing routes have been established for the production of ceramic and metallic foams. Ceramic foams may be produced by dipping a polymer foam into a slurry containing an appropriate binder and a ceramic phase, followed by sintering the dipped foam at elevated temperatures. A second process used to make metallic foams uses a process for the deposition of a metal onto the polymer foam precursor via electrolytic deposition.


A third process begins with the pyrolysis of the thermosetting plastic foam to obtain a carbonaceous foam skeleton that is thermally stable, low in weight and density, and chemically pure. Such foams have low thermal expansion and resist thermal stress and shock. The foam skeleton may then be infiltrated with refractory material(s) using a combination of chemical-vapor-deposition (CVD)/chemical-vapor-infiltration (CVI) technique. As used here, the term “refractory material” refers to refractory metals (e.g. zirconium, niobium, hafnium, tantalum, tungsten, rhenium) and their ceramic compounds (e.g. the oxides, nitrides, carbides, borides, and silicides). In this process, 10 to 1000 microns of the desired refractory metal or ceramic are deposited onto the interior surfaces of the reticulate carbon foam. The structural integrity of the resultant refractory foam composite material may be enhanced by such deposits. In fact, the properties of the composite may be dominated by the structure and properties of such deposits. The mechanical properties for a given material are often one to two orders of magnitude higher compared to slurry-cast materials because the CVD deposit may be up to 100% dense and have grain sizes less than 5 microns, sometime less than 1 micron. Thus, a CVD/CVI technique may be preferred. The open-pore carbon foam precursor may then be heated to the temperature suitable for the desired deposition reaction, while the reactant gases are pulled through it. The gaseous precursor compound is reduced or deposited at the foam surfaces, forming a uniform nanolayered deposit throughout the internal structure of the foam, with the nanolayering adding enhanced mechanical properties. The foam structure lattice may function, inter alia, as a substrate for the material being deposited.


It is important to note that, in the process described above, the structural integrity of the proppant particulate prepared from fabricated foam composite is primarily provided by the deposited thin films, rather than the foamed carbon substrate. In the case of carbon foams, these films have much higher elastic moduli than the thin sections of vitreous carbon in the foam. Their high stiffness relative to the carbon results in their supporting the mechanical load for the entire body, ensuring that failure does not occur in the carbon. Because of the superior properties of the deposited films, the individual ligaments act as microcellular materials, with 70-100% of the strength being contributed by the deposit.


Carbon foams suitable for use preparing particulates may be fabricated from any material that can be deposited by CVD/CVI or that can be used with dipping or electrolytic deposition methods. Stiffness, strength, thermal conductivity, and overall weight may be simultaneously optimized for a given required parameter (i.e. crush strength and particle density) by varying the chosen deposited materials and their densities.


The particulates of the present invention are preferably spherical. The term “spherical” is used in this invention will designate particulates having an average ratio of minimum diameter to maximum diameter of about 0.7 or greater. The size of the particulates of the present invention is generally about 8 U.S. mesh or smaller. Having such a particle size allows the particulates to be useful in sand control operations such as gravel packing and production enhancing operations such as fracturing. One skilled in the art with the benefit of this disclosure will recognize the appropriate size for a given application.


The carbon foam particulates of the present invention may be coated with various coating substances known in the art. These coating may be used, for example, to impart consolidation, to control formation fines, to increase the sphericity of the particle, to modify the density, or to coat the pores on the surface of the particle so that they do not present a barrier to the effect slurrying of the particulate in a carrier fluid. The coating may be either permanent (as in the case of a resinous coating), semi-permanent (as on the case of a tackifying coating), or temporary (as in the case of a degradable coating such as polylactic acid).


Suitable resinous coatings include those resins that are capable of forming a hardened, consolidated mass. Suitable resins include, but are not limited to, novolak resins, polyepoxide resins, phenol-aldehyde resins, urea-aldehyde resins, urethane resins, phenolic resins, furan/furfuryl alcohol resins, phenolic/latex resins, phenol formaldehyde resins, polyester resins and hybrids and copolymers thereof, polyurethane resins and hybrids and copolymers thereof, acrylate resins, and mixtures thereof. Some suitable resins, such as epoxy resins, may be cured with an internal catalyst or activator so that when pumped down hole, they may be cured using only time and temperature. Other suitable resins, such as furan resins generally require a time-delayed catalyst or an external catalyst to help activate the polymerization of the resins if the cure temperature is low (i.e., less than 250° F.), but will cure under the effect of time and temperature if the formation temperature is above about 250° F., preferably above about 300° F. It is within the ability of one skilled in the art, with the benefit of this disclosure, to select a suitable resin for use in embodiments of the present invention and to determine whether a catalyst is required to trigger curing.


Suitable tackifying coating for use in coating proppant used in the present invention comprise any compound that, when in liquid form or in a solvent solution, will form a non-hardening coating upon a particulate. Such compounds are commonly referred to as tackifying agents. A particularly preferred group of tackifying agents comprise polyamides that are liquids or in solution at the temperature of the subterranean formation such that they are, by themselves, non-hardening when introduced into the subterranean formation. A particularly preferred product is a condensation reaction product comprised of commercially available polyacids and a polyamine. Such commercial products include compounds such as mixtures of C36 dibasic acids containing some trimer and higher oligomers and also small amounts of monomer acids that are reacted with polyamines. Other polyacids include trimer acids, synthetic acids produced from fatty acids, maleic anhydride, acrylic acid, and the like. Such acid compounds are commercially available from companies such as Witco Corporation, Union Camp, Chemtall, and Emery Industries. The reaction products are available from, for example, Champion Technologies, Inc. and Witco Corporation. Additional compounds which may be used as tackifying compounds include liquids and solutions of, for example, polyesters, polycarbonates and polycarbamates, natural resins such as shellac and the like. Other suitable tackifying agents are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,853,048 issued to Weaver, et al. and U.S. Pat. No. 5,833,000 issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosures of which are herein incorporated by reference.


Tackifying agents suitable for use in the present invention may be either used such that they form non-hardening coating or they may be combined with a multifunctional material capable of reacting with the tackifying compound to form a hardened coating. A “hardened coating” as used herein means that the reaction of the tackifying compound with the multifunctional material will result in a substantially non-flowable reaction product that exhibits a higher compressive strength in a consolidated agglomerate than the tackifying compound alone with the particulates. In this instance, the tackifying agent may function similarly to a hardenable resin. Multifunctional materials suitable for use in the present invention include, but are not limited to, aldehydes such as formaldehyde, dialdehydes such as glutaraldehyde, hemiacetals or aldehyde releasing compounds, diacid halides, dihalides such as dichlorides and dibromides, polyacid anhydrides such as citric acid, epoxides, furfuraldehyde, glutaraldehyde or aldehyde condensates and the like, and combinations thereof. In some embodiments of the present invention, the multifunctional material may be mixed with the tackifying compound in an amount of from about 0.01 to about 50 percent by weight of the tackifying compound to effect formation of the reaction product. In some preferable embodiments, the compound is present in an amount of from about 0.5 to about 1 percent by weight of the tackifying compound. Suitable multifunctional materials are described in U.S. Pat. No. 5,839,510 issued to Weaver, et al., the relevant disclosure of which is herein incorporated by reference.


Still another alternative type of coating suitable for use in the present invention is a degradable coating material. Degradable coating materials not only act to lower the density of the particulate, but the products of the degradation may be useful in the subterranean formation beyond their use in lowering the particulate's density. For example, when the products of the degradation are acids, they, may be used to break the servicing fluid transporting the coated particulate or to degrade a filter cake neighboring the particulate. Any material that is capable of improving the shape of the particulate and then degrading over time may be suitable, so long as the material or the products of the degradation do not undesirably interfere with either the conductivity of a resultant particulate matrix or the production of any of the fluids from the subterranean formation.


Nonlimiting examples of degradable materials that may be used in conjunction with the present invention include but are not limited to degradable polymers. Such degradable materials are capable of undergoing an irreversible degradation down hole. The term “irreversible” as used herein means that the degradable material, once degraded down hole, should not recrystallize or reconsolidate while down hole, e.g., the degradable material should degrade in situ but should not recrystallize or reconsolidate in situ. The terms “degradation” or “degradable” refer to both the two relatively extreme cases of hydrolytic degradation that the degradable material may undergo, i.e., heterogeneous (or bulk erosion) and homogeneous (or surface erosion), and any stage of degradation in between these two. This degradation can be a result of, inter alia, a chemical or thermal reaction or a reaction induced by radiation.


The degradability of a polymer depends at least in part on its backbone structure. For instance, the presence of hydrolyzable and/or oxidizable linkages in the backbone often yields a material that will degrade as described herein. The rates at which such polymers degrade are dependent on the type of repetitive unit, composition, sequence, length, molecular geometry, molecular weight, morphology (e.g., crystallinity, size of spherulites, and orientation), hydrophilicity, hydrophobicity, surface area, and additives. Also, the environment to which the polymer is subjected may affect how it degrades, e.g., temperature, presence of moisture, oxygen, microorganisms, enzymes, pH, and the like.


Suitable examples of degradable polymers that may be used in accordance with the present invention include but are not limited to those described in the publication of Advances in Polymer Science, Vol. 157 entitled “Degradable Aliphatic Polyesters” edited by A.-C. Albertsson. Specific examples include homopolymers, random, block, graft, and star- and hyper-branched aliphatic polyesters. Polycondensation reactions, ring-opening polymerizations, free radical polymerizations, anionic polymerizations, carbocationic polymerizations, coordinative ring-opening polymerization, and any other suitable process may prepare such suitable polymers. Specific examples of suitable polymers include polysaccharides such as dextran or cellulose; chitins; chitosans; proteins; aliphatic polyesters; poly(lactides); poly(glycolides); poly(ε-caprolactones); poly(hydroxybutyrates); poly(anhydrides); aliphatic polycarbonates; poly(orthoesters); poly(amino acids); poly(ethylene oxides); and polyphosphazenes. Of these suitable polymers, aliphatic polyesters and polyanhydrides are preferred.


Polyanhydrides are another type of particularly suitable degradable polymer useful in the present invention. Polyanhydride hydrolysis proceeds, inter alia, via free carboxylic, acid chain-ends to yield carboxylic acids as final degradation products. The erosion time can be varied over a broad range of changes in the polymer backbone. Examples of suitable polyanhydrides include poly(adipic anhydride), poly(suberic anhydride), poly(sebacic anhydride), and poly(dodecanedioic anhydride). Other suitable examples include but are not limited to poly(maleic anhydride) and poly(benzoic anhydride).


Blends of certain degradable materials may also be suitable. One example of a suitable blend of materials is a mixture of poly(lactic acid) and poly(glycolides). Other materials that undergo an irreversible degradation may also be suitable, if the products of the degradation do not undesirably interfere with either the conductivity of the particulate matrix or with the production of any of the fluids from the subterranean formation.


In choosing the appropriate degradable material, one should consider the degradation products that will result. These degradation products should not adversely affect other operations or components. The choice of degradable material also can depend, at least in part, on the conditions of the well, e.g., well bore temperature. For instance, lactides have been found to be suitable for lower temperature wells, including those within the range of 60° F. to 150° F., and polylactides have been found to be suitable for well bore temperatures above this range. Also, poly(lactic acid) may be suitable for higher temperature wells. Some stereoisomers of poly(lactide) or mixtures of such stereoisomers may be suitable for even higher temperature applications. Dehydrated salts may also be suitable for higher temperature wells.


A preferable result may be achieved if the degradable material degrades slowly over time as opposed to instantaneously. Even more preferable results have been obtained when the degradable material does not begin to degrade until after a particulate matrix has substantially developed. The slow degradation of the degradable material, inter alia, helps to maintain the stability of the proppant matrix.


One embodiment of a method of the present invention provides an improved method of treating a subterranean formation using a servicing fluid comprising a hydrocarbon or water carrier fluid and carbon foam particulates of the present invention suspended therein. In the treatment methods of the present invention, a servicing fluid comprising a hydrocarbon or water carrier fluid comprising carbon foam particulates of the present invention suspended therein is placed into a subterranean formation and then the carrier fluid's viscosity is reduced so as to deposit at least a portion of the carbon foam particulates in a desired location in the subterranean formation.


Still another method of the present invention provides an improved method of hydraulic fracturing using reduced specific gravity particulates of the present invention. In some hydraulic fracturing methods of present invention, a first fluid is placed in the subterranean formation at a rate and pressure sufficient to form at least one fracture in the subterranean formation. Next, a second fluid comprising carbon foam particulates of the present invention is placed into the fractures. Next, the viscosity of the first fluid is reduced, inter alia, to facilitate its removal from the subterranean formation and the viscosity of the second fluid is reduced, inter alia, to deposit the suspended carbon foam particulates in the fracture and, inter alia, to facilitate the removal of the second fluid from the subterranean formation. Finally, the reduced viscosity first fluid and second fluid are substantially removed from the fracture and the subterranean formation.


Another method of the present invention provides an improved method of gravel packing a delivery fluid comprising a hydrocarbon or water carrier fluid comprising carbon foam particulates of the present invention suspended therein. In some of the gravel packing methods of the present invention, a gravel pack composition comprising a carrier fluid having carbon foam particulates of the present invention suspended therein is placed in a region of a well bore such that at least a portion of the carbon foam particulates form a gravel pack substantially adjacent to the well bore. Then the viscosity of the delivery fluid remaining in the well bore may be reduced so that it may then be removed from the subterranean formation.


Therefore, the present invention is well adapted to carry out the objects and attain the ends and advantages mentioned as well as those that are inherent therein. While numerous changes may be made by those skilled in the art, such changes are encompassed within the spirit and scope of this invention as defined by the appended claims.

Claims
  • 1. A method of treating a subterranean formation using a servicing fluid comprising: providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates; and,placing the slurry into a portion of a subterranean formation.
  • 2. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates have a specific gravity of below about 2.
  • 3. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates can substantially withstand a crush strength of at least about 500 psi.
  • 4. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates can substantially withstand a crush strength of at least about 6,000 psi.
  • 5. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are substantially spherical.
  • 6. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a resin wherein the resin comprises at least one resin selected from the group consisting of a novolak resin, a polyepoxide resin, a phenol-aldehyde resin, a urea-aldehyde resin, a urethane resin, a phenolic resin, a furan/furfuryl alcohol resin, a phenolic/latex resin, a phenol formaldehyde resin, a polyester resin, a hybrid polyester resin, a copolymer polyester resin, a polyurethane resin, a hybrid polyurethane resin, a copolymer polyurethane resin, an acrylate resin, and a combination thereof.
  • 7. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a tackifying coating wherein the tackifying coating comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polyamide, a condensation reaction product of a polyacid and a polyamine, a polyester; a polycarbonate, a polycarbamate, a natural resin and a combination thereof.
  • 8. The method of claim 7 wherein the tackifying coating further comprises a multifunctional material and wherein the multifunctional material comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of an aldehyde, a dialdehydes, a hemiacetal, an aldehyde releasing compound, a diacid halide, a dihalide, a polyacid anhydride, an epoxide, a furfuraldehyde, a glutaraldehyde, an aldehyde condensate, and a combination thereof.
  • 9. The method of claim 1 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a degradable coating material.
  • 10. The method of claim 9 wherein the degradable coating material comprises a degradable polymer.
  • 11. The method of claim 10 wherein the degradable coating material comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an aliphatic polyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a poly(anhydride), an aliphatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(amino acid), a poly(ethylene oxide), a polyphosphazene, and a combination thereof.
  • 12. The method of claim 10 wherein the degradable coating material comprises a stereoisomer of poly(lactide).
  • 13. A method of forming a proppant pack in a portion of a subterranean formation using a servicing fluid comprising: providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates; and,placing the slurry into at least one fracture in a subterranean formation; and,depositing at least a portion of the open-cell carbon foam particulates in at least a portion of the fracture so as to form a particulate pack.
  • 14. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates have a specific gravity of below about 2.
  • 15. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates can substantially withstand a crush strength of at least about 500 psi.
  • 16. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates can substantially withstand a crush strength of at least about 6,000 psi.
  • 17. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are substantially spherical.
  • 18. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a resin wherein the resin comprises at least one resin selected from the group consisting of a novolak resin, a polyepoxide resin, a phenol-aldehyde resin, a urea-aldehyde resin, a urethane resin, a phenolic resin, a furan/furfuryl alcohol resin, a phenolic/latex resin, a phenol formaldehyde resin, a polyester resin, a hybrid polyester resin, a copolymer polyester resin, a polyurethane resin, a hybrid polyurethane resin, a copolymer polyurethane resin, an acrylate resin, and a combination thereof.
  • 19. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a tackifying coating wherein the tackifying coating comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polyamide, a condensation reaction product of a polyacid and a polyamine, a polyester; a polycarbonate, a polycarbamate, a natural resin and a combination thereof.
  • 20. The method of claim 19 wherein the tackifying coating further comprises a multifunctional material and wherein the multifunctional material comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of an aldehyde, a dialdehyde, a hemiacetal, an aldehyde releasing compound, a diacid halide, a dihalide, a polyacid anhydride, an epoxide, a furfuraldehyde, a glutaraldehyde, an aldehyde condensate, and a combination thereof.
  • 21. The method of claim 13 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a degradable coating material.
  • 22. The method of claim 21 wherein the degradable coating material comprises a degradable polymer.
  • 23. The method of claim 22 wherein the degradable coating material comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an aliphatic polyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a poly(anhydride), an aliphatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(amino acid), a poly(ethylene oxide), a polyphosphazene, and a combination thereof.
  • 24. The method of claim 22 wherein the degradable coating material comprises a stereoisomer of poly(lactide).
  • 25. A method of gravel packing comprising: providing a slurry comprising a carrier fluid and open-cell carbon foam particulates;placing the slurry in a region of a well bore such that at least a portion of the carbon foam particulates form a gravel pack substantially adjacent to the well bore.
  • 26. The method of claim 25 wherein open-cell carbon foam particulates have a specific gravity of below about 2.
  • 27. The method of claim 25 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates can substantially withstand a crush strength of at least about 500 psi.
  • 28. The method of claim 25 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates can substantially withstand a crush strength of at least about 6,000 psi.
  • 29. The method of claim 25 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are substantially spherical.
  • 30. The method of claim 25 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a resin wherein the resin comprises at least one resin selected from the group consisting of a novolak resin, a polyepoxide resin, a phenol-aldehyde resin, a urea-aldehyde resin, a urethane resin, a phenolic resin, a furan/furfuryl alcohol resin, a phenolic/latex resin, a phenol formaldehyde resin, a polyester resin, a hybrid polyester resin, a copolymer polyester resin, a polyurethane resin, a hybrid polyurethane resin, a copolymer polyurethane resin, an acrylate resin, and a combination thereof.
  • 31. The method of claim 25 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a tackifying coating wherein the tackifying coating comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polyamide, a condensation reaction product of a polyacid and a polyamine, a polyester; a polycarbonate, a polycarbamate, a natural resin and a combination thereof.
  • 32. The method of claim 31 wherein the tackifying coating further comprises a multifunctional material and wherein the multifunctional material comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of an aldehyde, a dialdehyde, a hemiacetal, an aldehyde releasing compound, a diacid halide, a dihalide, a polyacid anhydride, an epoxide, a furfuraldehyde, a glutaraldehyde, an aldehyde condensate, and a combination thereof.
  • 33. The method of claim 25 wherein the open-cell carbon foam particulates are coated with a degradable coating material.
  • 34. The method of claim 33 wherein the degradable coating material comprises a degradable polymer.
  • 35. The method of claim 34 wherein the degradable coating material comprises at least one material selected from the group consisting of a polysaccharide, a chitin, a chitosan, a protein, an aliphatic polyester, a poly(lactide), a poly(glycolide), a poly(ε-caprolactone), a poly(hydroxybutyrate), a poly(anhydride), an aliphatic polycarbonate, a poly(orthoester), a poly(amino acid), a poly(ethylene oxide), a polyphosphazene, and a combination thereof.
  • 36. The method of claim 34 wherein the degradable coating material comprises a stereoisomer of poly(lactide).
US Referenced Citations (174)
Number Name Date Kind
2238671 Woodhouse Apr 1941 A
2703316 Palmer Mar 1955 A
3173484 Huitt et al. Mar 1965 A
3195635 Fast Jul 1965 A
3245866 Schott Apr 1966 A
3272650 MacVittie Sep 1966 A
3302719 Fischer Feb 1967 A
3364995 Atkins et al. Jan 1968 A
3366178 Malone et al. Jan 1968 A
3455390 Gallus Jul 1969 A
3664420 Graham et al. May 1972 A
3784585 Schmitt et al. Jan 1974 A
3819525 Hattenbrun Jun 1974 A
3828854 Templeton et al. Aug 1974 A
3868998 Lybarger et al. Mar 1975 A
3912692 Casey et al. Oct 1975 A
3948672 Harnsberger Apr 1976 A
3955993 Curtice May 1976 A
3960736 Free et al. Jun 1976 A
3968840 Tate Jul 1976 A
3998272 Maly Dec 1976 A
3998744 Arnold et al. Dec 1976 A
4068718 Cooke, Jr. et al. Jan 1978 A
4169798 DeMartino Oct 1979 A
4172066 Zweigle et al. Oct 1979 A
4261421 Watanabe Apr 1981 A
4387769 Erbstoesser et al. Jun 1983 A
4460045 Elson et al. Jul 1984 A
4460052 Gockel Jul 1984 A
4470915 Conway Sep 1984 A
4498995 Gockel Feb 1985 A
4526695 Erbstoesser et al. Jul 1985 A
4694905 Armbruster Sep 1987 A
4715967 Bellis Dec 1987 A
4716964 Erbstoesser Jan 1988 A
4785884 Armbruster Nov 1988 A
4796701 Hudson et al. Jan 1989 A
4797262 Dewitz Jan 1989 A
4809783 Hollenbeck et al. Mar 1989 A
4817721 Pober Apr 1989 A
4843118 Lai et al. Jun 1989 A
4848467 Cantu et al. Jul 1989 A
4886354 Welch et al. Dec 1989 A
4957165 Cantu et al. Sep 1990 A
4961466 Himes et al. Oct 1990 A
4986353 Clark et al. Jan 1991 A
4986354 Cantu et al. Jan 1991 A
4986355 Casad et al. Jan 1991 A
5082056 Tackett, Jr. Jan 1992 A
5142023 Gruber et al. Aug 1992 A
5216050 Sinclair Jun 1993 A
5247059 Gruber et al. Sep 1993 A
5249628 Surjaatmadia Oct 1993 A
5295542 Cole et al. Mar 1994 A
5325923 Surjaatmadja et al. Jul 1994 A
5330005 Card et al. Jul 1994 A
5359026 Gruber Oct 1994 A
5360068 Sprunt et al. Nov 1994 A
5363916 Himes et al. Nov 1994 A
5373901 Norman et al. Dec 1994 A
5386874 Laramay et al. Feb 1995 A
5396957 Surjaatmadja et al. Mar 1995 A
5402846 Jennings, Jr. et al. Apr 1995 A
5439055 Card et al. Aug 1995 A
5460226 Lawson et al. Oct 1995 A
5464060 Hale et al. Nov 1995 A
5475080 Gruber et al. Dec 1995 A
5484881 Gruber et al. Jan 1996 A
5497830 Boles et al. Mar 1996 A
5499678 Surjaatmadja et al. Mar 1996 A
5505787 Yamaguchi Apr 1996 A
5512071 Yam et al. Apr 1996 A
5536807 Gruber et al. Jul 1996 A
5591700 Harris et al. Jan 1997 A
5594095 Gruber et al. Jan 1997 A
5604186 Hunt et al. Feb 1997 A
5607905 Dobson, Jr. et al. Mar 1997 A
5670473 Scepanski Sep 1997 A
5698322 Tsai et al. Dec 1997 A
5765642 Surjaatmadja Jun 1998 A
5791415 Nguyen et al. Aug 1998 A
5833000 Weaver et al. Nov 1998 A
5849401 El-Afandi et al. Dec 1998 A
5853048 Weaver et al. Dec 1998 A
5893416 Read Apr 1999 A
5908073 Nguyen et al. Jun 1999 A
5924488 Nguyen et al. Jul 1999 A
5964291 Bourne et al. Oct 1999 A
6004400 Bishop et al. Dec 1999 A
6024170 McCabe et al. Feb 2000 A
6028113 Scepanski Feb 2000 A
6047772 Weaver et al. Apr 2000 A
6114410 Betzold Sep 2000 A
6123965 Jacob et al. Sep 2000 A
6131661 Conner et al. Oct 2000 A
6135987 Tsai et al. Oct 2000 A
6143698 Murphey et al. Nov 2000 A
6162766 Muir et al. Dec 2000 A
6169058 Le et al. Jan 2001 B1
6172011 Card et al. Jan 2001 B1
6189615 Sydansk Feb 2001 B1
6202751 Chatterji et al. Mar 2001 B1
6209643 Nguyen et al. Apr 2001 B1
6209646 Reddy et al. Apr 2001 B1
6214773 Harris et al. Apr 2001 B1
6242390 Mitchell et al. Jun 2001 B1
6260622 Blok et al. Jul 2001 B1
6302207 Nguyen et al. Oct 2001 B1
6311773 Todd et al. Nov 2001 B1
6323307 Bigg et al. Nov 2001 B1
6326458 Gruber et al. Dec 2001 B1
6328105 Betzold Dec 2001 B1
6357527 Norman et al. Mar 2002 B1
6364945 Chatterji et al. Apr 2002 B1
6380138 Ischy et al. Apr 2002 B1
6387986 Moradi-Araghi et al. May 2002 B1
6390195 Nguyen et al. May 2002 B1
6394185 Constien May 2002 B1
6422314 Todd et al. Jul 2002 B1
6454003 Chang et al. Sep 2002 B1
6485947 Rajgarhia et al. Nov 2002 B1
6488763 Brothers et al. Dec 2002 B2
6494263 Todd Dec 2002 B2
6508305 Brannon et al. Jan 2003 B1
6527051 Reddy et al. Mar 2003 B1
6554071 Reddy et al. Apr 2003 B1
6569814 Brady et al. May 2003 B1
6599863 Palmer et al. Jul 2003 B1
6656238 Rogers et al. Dec 2003 B1
6667279 Hessert et al. Dec 2003 B1
6669771 Tokiwa et al. Dec 2003 B2
6681856 Chatterji et al. Jan 2004 B1
6686328 Binder Feb 2004 B1
6702023 Harris et al. Mar 2004 B1
6710019 Sawdon et al. Mar 2004 B1
6761218 Nguyen et al. Jul 2004 B2
6763888 Harris et al. Jul 2004 B1
6817414 Lee Nov 2004 B2
6832650 Nguyen et al. Dec 2004 B2
6896058 Munoz, Jr. et al. May 2005 B2
6949491 Cooke, Jr. Sep 2005 B2
20010016562 Muir et al. Aug 2001 A1
20020036088 Todd Mar 2002 A1
20020125012 Dawson et al. Sep 2002 A1
20030060374 Cooke, Jr. Mar 2003 A1
20030114314 Ballard et al. Jun 2003 A1
20030130133 Vollmer Jul 2003 A1
20030188766 Banerjee et al. Oct 2003 A1
20030215354 Clark et al. Nov 2003 A1
20030234103 Lee et al. Dec 2003 A1
20040014607 Sinclair et al. Jan 2004 A1
20040040706 Hossaini et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040040708 Stephenson et al. Mar 2004 A1
20040055747 Lee Mar 2004 A1
20040094300 Sullivan et al. May 2004 A1
20040106525 Willbert et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040123985 Whitfill et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040138068 Rimmer et al. Jul 2004 A1
20040152601 Still et al. Aug 2004 A1
20040152602 Boles Aug 2004 A1
20040206499 Nguyen et al. Oct 2004 A1
20040216876 Lee Nov 2004 A1
20040231845 Cooke, Jr. Nov 2004 A1
20040261993 Nguyen Dec 2004 A1
20040261995 Nguyen et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261996 Monoz, Jr. et al. Dec 2004 A1
20040261999 Nguyen Dec 2004 A1
20050006095 Justus et al. Jan 2005 A1
20050028976 Nguyen Feb 2005 A1
20050034865 Todd et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050034868 Frost et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050103496 Todd et al. May 2005 A1
20050252659 Sullivan et al. Nov 2005 A1
20050272613 Cooke, Jr. Dec 2005 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (22)
Number Date Country
0 510 762 Apr 1992 EP
0 879 935 Nov 1998 EP
0 879 935 Feb 1999 EP
0 879 935 Oct 1999 EP
1 413 710 Apr 2004 EP
WO 9315127 Aug 1993 WO
WO 9407949 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9408078 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9408090 Apr 1994 WO
WO 9509879 Apr 1995 WO
WO 9711845 Apr 1997 WO
WO 9927229 Jun 1999 WO
WO 0057022 Sep 2000 WO
WO 0102698 Jan 2001 WO
WO 0187797 Nov 2001 WO
WO 0212674 Feb 2002 WO
WO 03027431 Apr 2003 WO
WO 03027431 Apr 2003 WO
WO 2004007905 Jan 2004 WO
WO 2004022914 Mar 2004 WO
WO 2004037946 May 2004 WO
WO 2004038176 May 2004 WO
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20060048938 A1 Mar 2006 US