The invention concerns a piston comprising carbon, for an internal combustion engine. The invention also concerns various combinations of such a carbon piston with cylinders comprising various materials.
The rising demands on modern spark-ignition and diesel engines are necessitating inter alia the use of pistons of low mass and low structural volume. To meet such demands carbon pistons have already been proposed, comprising a modified carbon, for example pressed graphite or hard-fired carbon, with a given minimum flexural strength (EP 0 258 330 A1), or pistons comprising a graphite produced from a binder-free carbon, referred to as a mesophase. The mesophase is a raw material which as an intermediate product of liquid-phase pyrolysis derives from hydrocarbons, preferably coal- and petroleum-based pitches and polyaromatics. By means of carbonisation and graphitisation procedures those polyaromatics give rise to mesophase spherulites in a particle size in the μ-range, which represent the material grains. Flexural strength levels of over 200 Mpa are attained in that way.
By virtue of the markedly lower coefficient of thermal expansion of carbon in comparison with the piston material aluminum, it is possible for the clearance between the piston and the bore surface of the cylinder to be kept substantially less. Furthermore carbon as a piston material affords advantageous emergency and cold-running properties by virtue of a certain capacity for absorbing oil and the lack of a tendency to suffer from welding (see EP 0 258 330 A1). Nonetheless it has hitherto not been possible to provide carbon pistons which are suitable for mass production, with the long service life which is required for automobiles and trucks. That is due inter alia to the fact that the thermal conductivity of carbon which is also considerably lower in comparison with aluminum means that the carbon piston in operation involves the formation of temperature fields which can differ considerably from those which are to be expected in aluminum pistons.
Therefore the object of the present invention is to propose a carbon piston for internal combustion engines, which, with the service life that is usually required, can replace mass-production aluminum pistons, in particular for automobiles and trucks, without adversely affecting the advantages which are attainable by virtue of the reduced density of carbon in comparison with aluminum and the lower level of thermal expansion thereof.
In accordance with the invention this is attained by the configurations set forth herein.
It is known in relation to aluminum pistons for the transition of the underside of the piston crown to the top land and the ring portion which carries the piston rings to be rounded in order to improve the flow of heat. In other respects however, with the intention of minimising the piston mass, the piston crown is dimensioned only from the strength point of view. That means that the thickness of the piston crown involves a usual value of 0.07 D (wherein D denotes the piston diameter) for spark-ignition engines and 0.1 D-0.25 D for diesel engines. In accordance with the invention however the design configuration of the underside of the piston crown is independent of the configuration of the top side of the piston crown, in the form of a curved or arched surface which also results in a marked accumulation of material precisely in the region between the increased-thickness portions of the boss means. The consequence of this is that in operation the piston involves a temperature field or gradient which makes it unnecessary to adopt an oval configuration for the top land and the ring portion of the piston. The options in regard to the configuration of a curved surface at the underside of the piston crown are set forth herein.
Although, as referred to above, carbons are in the meantime now available with levels of flexural strength which equal that of aluminum or even exceed it, in a development of the invention it is advantageous that the thickness of the piston crown is greater than is required for reasons of strength. Thus in accordance with the invention the above-mentioned general values for piston crown thicknesses can be between 15 and 20% higher, in other words, for spark-ignition engines at 0.084 D and for diesel engines at between 0.12 D and 0.3 D.
By virtue of the dome surface at the underside of the piston crown, the axial piston crown sag which is unequal in the case of aluminum pistons, when a pressure loading is applied, and which in the piston crown regions between the increased-thickness portions forming the boss means, that is to say transversely with respect to the axis of the piston pin, is a multiple of the sag in the region of the increased-thickness portions, can also be reduced or avoided. Besides the uneven temperature distribution, that sag phenomenon is the cause of the ovality of the piston which is necessary when aluminum pistons are involved, in particular in respect of the ring portion and the piston skirt. In the case of the carbon piston in accordance with the invention the ovality can be completely eliminated when dealing with relatively small piston diameters of up to 150 mm so that the piston is of a circular cross-section throughout and moreover can be of a markedly smaller dimension.
The configuration of the piston skirt also differs from that of aluminum pistons. Thus the cross-section of the piston according to the invention is also increased in the skirt region so that the temperature field or gradient which obtains in the piston is modified as a result of the reinforced junction of the piston skirt by way of the ring portion to the piston crown. According to the invention for that purpose the wall thickness of the piston skirt is between about 0.05D and 0.075D, preferably between about 0.56D and 0.7D. Whereas moreover in the case of aluminum pistons the axial profile of the peripheral surface of the piston skirt in the region of the boss means must be clearly crowned in order to control the different expansion characteristics in relation to the cylinder bore wall which is at a lower temperature, the carbon piston in accordance with the invention makes it possible to forego that cambered configuration. The peripheral surface of the piston skirt can therefore advantageously be in the form of a conical or tapering surface, the generatrix of which extends linearly between the connection to the ring portion and the lower edge of the skirt of the piston. Furthermore the deviation of that conical or taper surface from a cylindrical surface is considerably less than with the above-indicated profile of an aluminum piston, that is to say the diameter of the piston skirt at the junction to the ring portion is only between 0.075 and 0.8% less than the diameter at the lower edge of the piston skirt.
In principle, with the carbon piston according to the invention, it is possible for the piston rings used to be those which are also employed in connection with aluminum pistons. It is however advantageous for the carbon pistons to be used with piston rings which also consist of carbon as in that case there is no need to take account of different expansion characteristics. The above-mentioned flexural strength and the modulus of elasticity of the carbons which are available nowadays make it possible for the piston rings to be integrally formed and fitted in the same manner as is known in relation to metal piston rings. However the piston rings of carbon can be reduced in cross-section in comparison with metal piston rings by between 10 and 15% and, by virtue of the fact that their heat expansion characteristics are the same as those of the piston, the piston rings can be selected to involve considerably narrower axial clearances in the ring grooves, in relation to the groove sides. In addition the known rise in strength, increasing with rising temperature in the case of carbon, makes it possible to forego special ring support members or the like in relation to the piston ring in the ring groove which is most closely adjacent to the top land.
In order not to influence the stress and temperature field or gradient in the ring portion by virtue of bores which extend from the ring groove for accommodating the oil control ring, it is further possible to envisage providing instead of such bores in the lower side of the ring groove at least one drain opening which opens outwardly into the area around the opening of the boss means, the drain opening communicating with an oil pocket in the peripheral surface of the piston skirt. Desirably, two drain openings are provided in the ring groove on both sides of each opening in the boss means, with the drain openings being in communication with a respective pocket extending in an arcuate configuration around the respective opening in the boss means.
When carbon piston rings are used the bottom of the ring grooves may involve radii which are of the order of magnitude of between about 20% and 50% of the groove width.
The described configuration of the carbon piston according to the invention also has effects on the configuration of the boss means for accommodating the piston pin. Thus, as a departure from the known configurations for aluminum pistons, the bore for accommodating the piston pin may be of a purely cylindrical configuration because stress peaks in the bore surfaces are removed by virtue of the damping effect caused by the material employed. There is no need for additional bores to provide an oil supply to the piston pin because even in the event of the possible use of a piston pin of hardened steel or a piston pin of ceramic (silicon nitride), they afford good sliding co-operation with the carbon.
Although the above-described increases in cross-section in the carbon piston according to the invention result in an increase in mass, the carbon piston of the invention enjoys a reduction in piston mass of between 15 and 25% in comparison with aluminum pistons of the same capability. The advantage of the lower density of carbon in comparison with aluminum is therefore retained. All in all however when observing the above-described design principles the advantages of making automobile and truck pistons from carbon, being advantages which were admittedly recognised in principle but which it was hitherto not possible to implement, can be achieved. It is thus possible to arrange clearances between the piston and the co-operating cylinder bore wall surface, which are only about 30% of the clearances required for aluminum pistons. That results in reduced oil consumption and also reduced blow-by so that in turn only extremely slight carbonisation deposits and an increase in compression pressure by at least 10% in comparison with aluminum pistons are the consequences thereof. The small running clearance at the top land and the entire piston in itself means that the piston rings are subjected to a lower level of loading so that they can be expected to have a longer service life. The carbon piston in accordance with the invention can also be combined with different cylinder bore surfaces. The installation clearances to be observed for the carbon piston when in the cold condition are respectively dependent on the choice of material for the cylinder bore surface. The clearances are smaller when using cylinder bore surfaces of ceramic and they become greater when involving metal cylinder bore surfaces comprising aluminum, gray cast iron or steel. Differing heat expansion characteristics of the cylinder bore surfaces however can be substantially compensated by cooling them to a greater or lesser degree.
Further advantages and features of the invention will be apparent from the description hereinafter of preferred embodiments with reference to the accompanying drawings. In the drawings:
a and 9b show a piston with a piston crown underside which is a spherical surface,
a and 10b show a piston with a piston crown underside which is a toric surface, whose axis is parallel to the axis of the boss bore,
a and 11b show a piston with a piston crown underside in the form of a partial surface of an ellipsoid of revolution, whose axis of revolution (ar) coincides with the axis of the piston,
a and 12b show a piston with a piston crown underside which is a partial surface of an ellipsoid of revolution, whose large major axis is at a right angle to the axis of the piston and forms the axis of revolution (ar), and
The piston shown in
Provided in the ring portion 3 for piston rings (not shown) are three ring grooves 31 of which the lowermost ring groove serves to receive an oil control ring. Provided in the lower side of the ring groove 31 for accommodating the oil control ring, in displaced relationship beside the bore 5 in the peripheral direction of the piston, is a drain opening 32 which communicates with a shallow oil pocket 33 in the peripheral surface of the piston skirt 4. In the proximity of the oil drain opening 32 the depth of the oil pocket 33 is for example 3 mm and the oil pocket 33 extends arcuately around and outside the increased-thickness portion 54 surrounding the bore 5 in the boss of the piston. The depth of the oil pocket 33 decreases at the lower end, tapering off to terminate at the peripheral surface 41.
As can be seen from
The diameter of the piston crown 1, that is to say. the piston diameter D, is 86.835 mm in the illustrated embodiment; the thickness of the piston crown 1, from the top edge of the top land 2 and without having regard to the recess or basin 11, at the apex of the underneath surface 12 of the piston crown 1, is 22 mm. The total height of the piston from the top edge of the top land 2 to the lower edge 44 of the piston skirt 4 is 76.3 mm, with the piston skirt 4 being 7.5 mm in thickness. That means that the piston crown thickness is 0.25 D, that is to say a ratio which for a diesel engine piston of this size is considerably higher than the corresponding value for an aluminum or gray cast iron piston.
In the region of the top land 2′ the piston as shown in
The embodiment of the piston as shown in
The piston shown in
For a practical situation the partial surface referred to herein of the ellipsoid of revolution can be approximated by the surface of a spherical portion having the radius R′a, which is adjoined at the two ends of the large major axis 115 by the respective surface of half a spherical portion having the radius R′b. The center point A′ for the radius R′a lies on the axis 114 of the piston; the center point B′ for the radii R′b is disposed respectively on the large major axis 115. The radius R′a which substantially determines the surface configuration of the underside 112 of the piston crown can be calculated in accordance with the following formula:
R′a=ri min+d/2
wherein ri denotes the spacing of the center point M from the underside 112 of the piston crown; ri min is thus the smallest spacing of the center point M from the underside of the piston crown, measured along the axis 114 of the piston, and d denotes the diameter of the inside wall 142 of the piston skirt 104 at the height of the large major axis 115, equivalent here to the height of the axis 153 of the bore 105 in the boss means.
Based on measurement of the thickness of the piston crown in the measurement range referred to in the opening part of this specification of between 0.12 D and 0.3 D (D=nominal piston diameter) and the dimension of the skirt wall thickness s in the measurement range referred to in the opening part of this specification of between 0.05 D and 0.075 D, it is possible to determine in each case the position of the center point A′ on the axis 114 of the piston and the position of the center points B′ on the major axes 115. In regard to the dimension of the piston crown thickness it must additionally be borne in mind in this respect that the lowermost ring groove in the ring portion 103 is sufficiently far above the curved underside of the piston crown in order not to have an adverse effect on the flow of heat and forces by virtue of a reduction in cross-section at that location. The transitions between the partial spherical surfaces produced in that way are smoothed by transitional surfaces in relation to the surface of an ellipsoid of revolution. In this embodiment the underneath surface 112 of the piston crown extends in the direction of the axis 153 of the bore 105 of the boss means over a shorter distance than transversely thereto because, in the region of the increased-thickened boss portions 151, it is necessary to take account of the fact that there is still sufficient space for the connecting rod eye. The transitions to the increased-thickness boss portions 151 are rounded in each case.
The radius for the curved surface which determines the underside 112 of the piston crown can also be estimated or established by the approximate value R′a=KD with K=0.5-0.75.
Thus the internal contour of the piston crown in the piston according to the invention differs markedly from the internal contour of conventional aluminum pistons in which the piston crown is of a substantially plate-shaped configuration and is rounded only in the transition to the top land and to the ring portion which carries the piston rings. As a consequence thereof, in regard to strength calculation of the piston crown of carbon pistons according to the invention which are relatively highly loaded (for example the piston of
W=π/32·CD2(1−α4),
wherein
α=c/C=d/D=rira=const.
In the illustrated embodiment ra max=D/2. In
In the case of pistons according to the invention which are relatively slightly loaded, for example for spark-ignition engines, both the piston crown thickness and also the piston skirt wall thickness s can be selected to lie at the lower limit of the specified dimensional ranges. In this case, for calculating the moment of resistance of the piston crown, it is possible to make use of calculation of the moment of resistance of hollow-elliptical bodies with a constant wall thickness by virtue of the simplified formula:
W≈0.2 sD(D+3C)
The above-described procedure for ascertaining the surface configuration of the underside 112 of the piston crown and the procedure for calculating the moment of resistance in that respect can be transferred without noticeable errors to an underneath surface of a piston crown, which forms part of the surface of a cylinder of elliptical cross-section. The axis of that cylinder is at a right angle to the axis 114 of the piston and coincides with the axis 153 of the bore 105 in the boss means, that is to say the generatrices of the cylinder are perpendicular to the plane of the drawing in FIG. 6. The large major axis 115 of the elliptical cross-section of that cylinder is in turn at a right angle to the axis 114 of the piston and also the axis 153 (see FIG. 6). In this case the piston requires in the region of the end points of the major axis 115 more extensive transitional surfaces into the inside wall 142 which is of a substantially circular-cylindrical configuration at the transition to the skirt 104.
In
A corresponding consideration applies if the underside of the piston crown is formed by the partial surface of an ellipsoid of revolution whose axial section affords the same image as the ellipsoid of revolution shown in
In the case of carbon pistons it is possible substantially to forego a de-axing configuration which is frequently implemented in the case of aluminum pistons, that is to say a displacement of the axis of the piston pin with respect to the axis of the piston. If nonetheless de-axing is appropriate the extent thereof is still less than that of aluminum pistons. The above-described embodiments illustrated in
a-b, 10a-b, 11a-b, 12a-b and 13 illustrate alternative embodiments of the underside of the piston crown in accordance with the present invention.
In all the above-described embodiments there is theoretically between the substantially circular-cylindrical inside wall of the piston and the curved surface forming the underside of the piston crown an intersection edge which in practice is avoided by transitional radii or rounded portions.
It is a matter of significance that the profile shown in broken line of the piston skirt, extending from the lower edge of the ring portion 3, extends substantially rectilinearly to the lower edge 44 of the piston skirt, that is to say it involves a conical or tapering surface without the camber configuration required in the case of aluminum pistons. It can further be seen that, with this carbon piston, by virtue of the higher levels of thermal loading to be expected, the top land 2 does not have a cylindrical but a tapering outside surface. However the piston does not involve any ovality whatsoever in its region.
The above-specified numerical values are in principle correspondingly lower in the event of a pairing of piston/cylinder when using a carbon piston than when a pairing with an aluminum piston is involved. Nonetheless the values involved change in dependence on whether the cylinder bore surface is formed by gray cast iron or by other materials. Thus the cylinder may have light-metal bore surfaces comprising aluminum, magnesium and the like which in known manner carry a nickel coating with a high proportion of silicon carbide, known by the marks NIKASIL or ELNISIL. It is also possible for the bore surfaces to have purely ceramic coatings. Finally, the cylinder may also have cylinder sleeves or cylinder bore surfaces comprising composite materials which are made up of metal/ceramic and which are known for example under the marks ALUSIL, LOKASIL and SILITEC. When the cylinder bore surface is formed from those materials which thus differ from gray cast iron, the installation clearance of the piston in the cold condition is between 0.010 and 0.035% of the piston diameter, in which respect that value is established transversely with respect to the axis of the piston pin if the piston already involves an ovality by virtue of the piston size.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
198 48 649 | Oct 1998 | DE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCTDE99/03379 | 10/21/1999 | WO | 00 | 6/14/2000 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO0025012 | 5/4/2000 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1467255 | Thomson | Sep 1923 | A |
1514022 | Smith | Nov 1924 | A |
3613521 | Itano | Oct 1971 | A |
4074616 | Gale et al. | Feb 1978 | A |
4140096 | Dunn et al. | Feb 1979 | A |
4297976 | Bruni et al. | Nov 1981 | A |
4450610 | Schaper | May 1984 | A |
4736676 | Taylor | Apr 1988 | A |
4754731 | Bohm et al. | Jul 1988 | A |
5054375 | Kawabata et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5794943 | Atmur et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1 062 486 | Jul 1959 | DE |
2 046 862 | Mar 1972 | DE |
27 14 484 | Oct 1977 | DE |
27 26 273 | Dec 1977 | DE |
29 23 934 | Dec 1979 | DE |
29 12 786 | May 1980 | DE |
3843761 | Jul 1980 | DE |
30 36 904 | Jun 1982 | DE |
3040125 | Jun 1982 | DE |
32 40 224 | Mar 1984 | DE |
33 01 724 | Jul 1984 | DE |
3406479 | Aug 1985 | DE |
3420571 | Jan 1986 | DE |
34 41 713 | May 1986 | DE |
3605918 | Aug 1986 | DE |
38 01 847 | Aug 1988 | DE |
43 26 978 | Feb 1995 | DE |
19547226 | Jun 1996 | DE |
19616474 | Aug 1997 | DE |
19708252 | Sep 1997 | DE |
19643778 | May 1998 | DE |
0420618 | Apr 1991 | EP |
0 695 866 | Feb 1996 | EP |
0752525 | Jan 1997 | EP |
364787 | Jan 1932 | GB |
2084696 | Apr 1982 | GB |
58-56112 | Apr 1983 | JP |
58-130054 | Aug 1983 | JP |
59-22272 | Feb 1984 | JP |
60-30455 | Feb 1985 | JP |
60-100543 | Jun 1985 | JP |
60-178347 | Sep 1985 | JP |
61-39455 | Feb 1986 | JP |
6-330813 | Nov 1994 | JP |
WO 8502805 | Jul 1985 | WO |
WO 8705076 | Aug 1987 | WO |
8705076 | Aug 1987 | WO |