Carburized component and manufacturing method thereof

Information

  • Patent Application
  • 20070246126
  • Publication Number
    20070246126
  • Date Filed
    April 19, 2007
    17 years ago
  • Date Published
    October 25, 2007
    16 years ago
Abstract
The carburized component of the present inventions is characterized by having a base metal containing:C: 0.10% to 0.40%;Si: 0.05% to 0.8%;Mn: 0.35% to 1.2%;Cr: 2.0% to 6.0%; andremnant including Fe and inevitable impurities,having a carburized layer formed on a surface layer portion of said base metal, having a grain boundary oxidized layer depth of 1 μm or less on a surface thereof and an average C concentration SC of 1.5% to 4.0% at 25 μm deep from the surface, andadjusted so as to satisfy:
Description

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS


FIG. 1 shows a diagram showing change of the carbide type by the surface C concentration and the Cr concentration.



FIG. 2 shows explanatory diagrams for carburizing process.



FIG. 3 shows sectional pattern diagrams and sectional observed views of the steel during carburizing process.



FIG. 4 shows a explanatory diagram and a sectional observed view of an example for carburizing process different from the present invention.





BEST MODE FOR CARRYING OUT THE INVENTION
Examples

Hereinafter, tests conducted in order to confirm the effects of the present invention will be explained.


First, steel having a chemical composition shown in Table 1 of 150 kg was molten in a high-frequency vacuum induction furnace. The obtained steel ingot was rolled or hot-forged to be a round bar having a diameter of 90 mm, and further hot-forged to be a round bar having a diameter of 22 mm to 32 mm, both ends inclusive, as required, so as to obtain a test material.























TABLE 1














Annealing
Surface C
Carbide
≦10 μm
Presence of




C
Si
Mn
Cr
Mo
V
Nb
Hardness
Concentration
Area Ratio
Area Ratio
≧15 μm
Carbide



wt %
wt %
wt %
wt %
wt %
wt %
wt %
HRB
wt %
%
%
Carbide
Type





























 1*
0.07*
0.41
0.49
3.44
0.00
0.00
0.00
76
2.32%
35%
92%
Absent
100% M3C


 2
0.22
0.31
0.39
3.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
74
1.91%
25%
95%
Absent
100% M3C


 3*
0.49*
0.63
0.50
5.90
0.00
0.00
0.00
 93*
3.31%
66%
87%
Absent
100% M3C


 4*
0.21
0.03*
0.55
5.01
0.00
0.00
0.00
75
3.42%
61%
 62%*
Present*
100% M3C


 5
0.22
0.13
0.44
4.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
77
2.88%
51%
93%
Absent
100% M3C


 6
0.23
0.46
0.40
3.20
0.00
0.00
0.00
80
2.39%
37%
100% 
Absent
100% M3C


 7
0.20
0.77
0.35
3.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
82
2.42%
40%
98%
Absent
100% M3C


 8*
0.18
1.25*
0.52
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
88
1.15%*
10%
100% 
Absent
100% M3C


 9*
0.21
0.46
0.10*
2.30
0.00
0.00
0.00
73
1.92%
28%
93%
Absent
100% M3C


10
0.18
0.67
0.55
4.48
0.00
0.00
0.00
81
2.43%
42%
98%
Absent
100% M3C


 11*
0.23
0.65
1.54*
4.21
0.00
0.00
0.00
 92*
2.27%
38%
94%
Absent
100% M3C


 12*
0.22
0.36
0.52
1.85*
0.00
0.00
0.00
74
1.82%
24%
96%
Absent
100% M3C


13
0.23
0.53
0.53
2.52
0.00
0.00
0.00
78
2.01%
33%
97%
Absent
100% M3C


 14*
0.19
0.78
0.48
6.44*
0.00
0.00
0.00
 91*
3.03%
58%
82%
Absent
100% M3C


15
0.21
0.52
0.59
3.57
0.25
0.00
0.00
82
1.83%
25%
94%
Absent
100% M3C


16
0.19
0.45
0.38
4.64
0.00
0.44
0.00
77
2.44%
38%
96%
Absent
100% M3C


17
0.25
0.70
0.45
3.42
0.27
0.40
0.00
84
2.37%
43%
98%
Absent
100% M3C


18
0.30
0.11
0.49
4.02
0.00
0.00
0.08
87
2.33%
35%
93%
Absent
100% M3C


19
0.31
0.21
0.98
3.21
0.00
0.22
0.03
86
2.41%
40%
93%
Absent
100% M3C


20*
0.23
0.77
0.53
8.52*
0.00
0.00
0.00
 91*
4.22%*
70%
80%
Absent
100% M3C


21
0.22
0.31
0.39
3.02
0.00
0.00
0.00
74
2.01%
24%
95%
Absent
100% M3C


22
0.19
0.65
0.55
2.00
0.00
0.00
0.00
75
1.65%
21%
100% 
Absent
100% M3C


23
0.20
0.53
0.55
2.33
0.00
0.00
0.00
74
1.70%
22%
100% 
Absent
100% M3C


24
0.21
0.40
0.55
2.85
0.00
0.00
0.00
74
1.75%
25%
100% 
Absent
100% M3C





*indicates that the value is out of the range of the present invention.






The obtained test materials were evaluated as follows:


(1) Manufacturability Evaluation (Material Machinability)

Manufacturability was evaluated by evaluating hardness after annealing. That was, a normalizing process at 920° C. for one hour is applied to a round bar test piece having a diameter of 32 mm and a length of 100 mm, and further a annealing process at 760° C. for five hours was applied. The obtained test piece was measured at a position of half radius of the cross-section (cross-section perpendicular to the axis) with Rockwell Hardness B-Scale, HRB, according to JIS:Z2245, and HRB 90 or less was determined as excellent machinability.


(2) Carburization Basic Property Evaluation
(2-1) Carburizing Process Method

Round bar test pieces having a length of 100 mm were produced respectively as carburizability test pieces from forged steel bars having diameters of 10 mm and 20 mm. The carburizing process used a vacuum carburizing furnace, and acethylene as carburizing gas, and by controlling a propane gas flow rate, carburizing diffusion time and a carburizing temperature, the surface C concentration was controlled within a range of 1.15% by mass to 4.01% by mass, both ends inclusive. Additionally, the carburizing conditions were as follows:


The first carburizing process: In order to have a top surface C concentration of approximately 1.0% by mass, after applying a carburizing process at 1100° C. for seventy minutes, the test piece was rapidly quenched by gas cooling to a temperature range of 500° C. or less, so as to infiltrate C into the steel to a high concentration range that carbide did not precipitate.


The second carburizing process: According to a target carburizing concentration, after applying a precipitation process by retaining a temperature range of 850° C. to 900° C., both ends inclusive, and further according to a target C concentration, a carburizing process was conducted in a temperature range of 850° C. to 900° C., both ends inclusive, for 60 to 120 minutes, both ends inclusive, and then a quenching process was conducted in an oil tank of 130° C. Also, after the quenching process, a tempering process was conducted at 180° C. for 120 minutes. Additionally, for the test piece No. 21, a steel ball having a diameter of 0.6 mm and hardness of 700 Hv was used, and after carburizing, shot-peening was applied under a condition having a coverage of 300% and a arc height of 0.5 mmA.


(2-2) Evaluation Items

Hereinafter, items for which the evaluation was conducted will be explained. The evaluation results are shown in Table 2.


Surface C concentration: After the carburizing process, a C concentration at 25 μm deep from a surface of the processed test piece was measured by EPMA (Electron Probe Microanalysis) combined with SEM.


Carbide area ratio: A cross-section of the round bar test piece, which had been carburized, quenched and tempered, was polished and corroded with picral etchant, and then a photography thereof was taken at 25 μm deep from the top surface by SEM (observation magnification of 3000×), and by image analysis the area ratio was measured.


Carbide size: The area ration of carbide having 10 μm or less was measured by observing the same conditions as above.


Presence of cancellous carbide: Presence of cancellous carbide was examined by observing the same conditions above.


Presence of imperfectly-quenched structure: A cross-section of the round bar test piece, which had carburized, quenched and tempered, was polished, corroded with nital etchant, and then observed at 25 μm deep from the top surface with an optical microscope, so as that presence of an imperfectly-quenched structure was examined.


Depth of grain boundary oxidized layer: A cross-section of the round bar test piece, which had carburized, quenched and tempered, was polished, and then observed with an optical microscope in a uncorroded state, so as that depth of a blackish layer along the grain boundary of the top surface was measured.


Temper softening resistance: The round bar test piece, which had carburized, quenched and tempered, was further tempered at 300° C. for 180 min., polished, and then measured at 25 μm deep from the top surface with Vickers Hardness (test weight: 200 g)Hv according to a method specified in JIS:Z2244, also determining that the strength improving effect was sufficient in a case Hv750 or more was obtained (The strength was improved 30% or more comparing with a gas eutectoid carburized piece composed of SCR420 material).


Identification of carbide volume ratio: It was conducted by measuring an X-ray diffraction profile as explained above. The above tests were conducted respectively using a test piece having a diameter of 10 mm.


Non-carburized layer strength: Using a test piece of a diameter of 20 mm, a cross sectional center portion of the test piece was measured with Rockwell Hardness C-scale, HRC, and the non-carburized layer strength having HRC 30 or more is determined as accepted.


Surface fatigue strength evaluation: A fatigue test was conducted by a widely-known roller pitching testing machine, and load surface pressure causing no roller pitching at 107 cycle was defined as the surface fatigue strength, so as to conduct the evaluation. Specifically, a round bar having a diameter of 32 mm was first heated and retained at 950° C., and then slowly-cooled to be softened, and a roller pitching test piece having a test part diameter of 26 mm was fabricated by machining. Also, ball-bearing steel (SUJ2) was used as a material of an opposing roller to the test piece, and quenching and tempering processes were applied so as to have a hardness of HRC61. Additionally, a curvature radius of the big roller was 150R or 700R. A carburizing process to the test piece was conducted simultaneously with the carburizing process conducted in order to conduct the above-described basic evaluation test of the inventive steel. Additionally, after the carburizing process, a part of the pitching test piece was tempered by retained at 300° C. for 3 hours, and then evaluated with surface C concentration, carbide area ratio, maximum carbide size and tempering hardness. Also, the surface fatigue strength set surface fatigue strength of the gas eutectoid carburized piece specified in JIS:SCR420 as a reference value (1.0), each material strength was shown with a magnification index to the reference value, and in a case of achieving the surface fatigue strength of 30% or more than the reference value, it was determined that the strength improving effect was sufficient. The above results are shown in Table 2.















TABLE 2









Grain







Boundary

300° C.
Equation 1



















Imperfectly-
Oxidized
Core
Tempering
Cr
Cr

Surface Fatigue




Cancellous
Tempered
layer
Hard-
Hardness
Lower
Upper

Strength Ratio



















Carbide
Structure
Depth
ness
Hv
Limit
Limit
Evaluation
Index
Evaluation
Special Note






















 1*
Absent
Absent
Absent
NG*
803
3.02
5.02

1.42

The non-carburized layer













strength was NG.


 2
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
757
2.30
4.30

1.30

OK


 3
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
899
4.77
6.77

1.63

The material machinability was













NG.


 4*
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
877
4.92
6.92

1.21*
X*
The surface fatigue strength













was NG.


 5
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
832
4.01
6.01

1.47

OK


 6
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
803
3.15
5.15

1.35

OK


 7
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
835
3.20
5.20

1.44

OK


 8*
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
 740*
0.96
2.96

1.22*
X*
The surface C concentration did













not increase, resulting in the













insufficient surface fatigue













strength.


 9*
Absent
Present*
Absent
OK
 720*
2.32
4.32
X
0.90*
X*
The hardenability was NG.


10
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
841
3.22
5.22

1.43

OK


11
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
820
2.94
4.94

1.42

The material machinability was













NG.


 12*
Absent
Present*
Absent
OK
 702*
2.14
4.14
X*
0.90*
X*
The hardenability was













NG.


13
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
792
2.48
4.48

1.33

OK


 14*
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
897
4.27
6.27
X*
1.51

The material machinability was













NG.


15
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
796
2.16
4.16

1.33

OK


16
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
811
3.23
5.23

1.34

OK


17
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
827
3.11
5.11

1.41

OK


18
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
793
3.04
5.04

1.33

OK


19
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
810
3.18
5.18

1.40

OK


 20*
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
934
6.37
8.37
X*
1.71

Satisfying the required Cr













amount to the surface C













concentration resulted













in the insufficient material













machinability.


21
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
866
2.48
4.48

1.76

OK (shot-peening conducted.)


22
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
750
1.84
3.84

1.30

OK


23
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
766
1.93
3.93

1.34

OK


24
Absent
Absent
Absent
OK
786
2.02
4.02

1.39

OK





*indicates that the value is out of the range of the present invention.






According to the above results, it can be recognized that the respective example pieces do not show imperfectly-quenched structures, cancellous carbide, or grain boundary oxidization, which cause strength deterioration, and have excellent manufacturability (annealing hardness≦HRB90), can obtain tempering hardness (≧750 Hv) at 300° C. sufficiently, and have excellent fatigue strength.

Claims
  • 1. A carburized component having a base metal comprised of a steel containing: C: 0.10% by mass to 0.40% by mass;Si: 0.05% by mass to 0.8% by mass;Mn: 0.35% by mass to 1.2% by mass;Cr: 2.0% by mass to 6.0% by mass;both ends inclusive, andremnant including Fe and inevitable impurities,having a carburized layer formed on a surface layer portion of said base metal, having a grain boundary oxidized layer depth of 1 μm or less on a surface thereof and an average C concentration SC of 1.5% by mass to 4.0% by mass, both ends inclusive, at 25 μm deep from the surface, andadjusted so as to satisfy: 1.76SC−1.06<WCr<1.76SC+0.94  (1)
  • 2. The carburized component according to claim 1, wherein said steel further contains at least one of: Mo: 0.2% by mass to 1.0% by mass; andV: 0.2% by mass to 1.0% by mass,both ends inclusive.
  • 3. The carburized component according to claim 1, wherein said steel further contains: Nb of 0.02% by mass to 0.12% by mass,both ends inclusive.
  • 4. The carburized component according to claim 2, wherein said steel further contains: Nb of 0.02% by mass to 0.12% by mass,both ends inclusive.
  • 5. A manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 1, wherein a first carburizing process is applied to the base metal composed of said steel at a temperature of an Acm point or higher by vacuum carburizing, afterward quenched rapidly to an A1 point or lower, and then a second carburizing process is applied thereto at a temperature of the A1 point to the Acm point, both ends inclusive, by vacuum carburizing.
  • 6. A manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 2, wherein a first carburizing process is applied to the base metal composed of said steel at a temperature of an Acm point or higher by vacuum carburizing, afterward quenched rapidly to an A1 point or lower, and then a second carburizing process is applied thereto at a temperature of the A1 point to the Acm point, both ends inclusive, by vacuum carburizing.
  • 7. A manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 3, wherein a first carburizing process is applied to the base metal composed of said steel at a temperature of an Acm point or higher by vacuum carburizing, afterward quenched rapidly to an A1 point or lower, and then a second carburizing process is applied thereto at a temperature of the A1 point to the Acm point, both ends inclusive, by vacuum carburizing.
  • 8. A manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 4, wherein a first carburizing process is applied to the base metal composed of said steel at a temperature of an Acm point or higher by vacuum carburizing, afterward quenched rapidly to an A1 point or lower, and then a second carburizing process is applied thereto at a temperature of the A1 point to the Acm point, both ends inclusive, by vacuum carburizing.
  • 9. The manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 5, wherein after applying said second carburizing process, a peening process is applied to the surface of said carburized layer.
  • 10. The manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 6, wherein after applying said second carburizing process, a peening process is applied to the surface of said carburized layer.
  • 11. The manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 7, wherein after applying said second carburizing process, a peening process is applied to the surface of said carburized layer.
  • 12. The manufacturing method of the carburized component according to claim 8, wherein after applying said second carburizing process, a peening process is applied to the surface of said carburized layer.
Priority Claims (2)
Number Date Country Kind
2006-116308 Apr 2006 JP national
2007-035632 Feb 2007 JP national