1. Field of the Invention
The present invention relates to playing card-feeding systems, particularly card-feeding systems for shuffling devices that may be used in a casino or card club environment, and particularly playing card-shuffling devices that use a gravity-feed system for providing playing cards from a playing card input chamber.
2. Background of the Art
In the movement of cards within playing card-handling devices, a typical card-feeding system may include pick-off roller(s) that are located on the bottom of stacks to remove one card at a time. The weight of a stack of cards ordinarily provides sufficient traction against the rollers to assure proper movement of most of the cards. But as the stack thins out after most of the cards have been delivered, the weight may no longer be sufficient (especially with the last few remaining cards in the stack) to assure proper movement of the cards.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,692,748 (Frisco) describes a card-shuffling device containing free-swinging weights on pivoting arms to apply pressure to the top of stacks of cards that are to be mixed. The disclosure, particularly that relating to
U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,655,684; 6,588,751; 6,588,750; 6,568,678; 6,325,373; 6,254,096; 6,149,154; (Grauzer) and 6,139,014; 6,068,258; 5,695,189 (Breeding) describe a shuffler or card delivery shoe having a standard free-floating weight to provide increased force on the cards to keep them oriented and assist in their advancing. The Breeding references disclose sensors for detecting the presence of cards in a delivery tray or elsewhere.
U.S. Pat. No. 6,637,622 (Robinson) describes a card delivery device with a weighted roller assisting in allowing the cards to be easily removed. The weighted cover is on the delivery end of the dealing shoe, covering the next card to be delivered.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,722,893 (Hill) describes the use of a weighted block behind cards in a delivery shoe to provide additional weight on the cards to trigger sensors. The reference specifically states: “In operation, a wedge-shaped block mounted on a heavy stainless steel roller (not shown) in a first position indicates that no cards are in the shoe. When the cards are placed in the shoe, the wedge-shaped block will be placed behind the cards and it and the cards will press against the load switch.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,431,399 (Kelley) describes a bridge hand-forming device in which cards are placed into an infeed area and the cards are randomly or predeterminately distributed to four receiving trays. A weight is shown placed over the infeed cards.
In shufflers where there is a single stack of cards to be shuffled and the weight of the cards presses the lowermost cards into contact with card-moving elements such as pick-off rollers, friction contact plates, and the like, it has been suggested by the inventors that as the stack of cards diminishes and fewer cards are present to provide contact forces with the lowermost card-moving element, this failure of strong contact forces may be a cause for delivery failures in the last cards in a set of cards in the delivery chamber. It would be desirable to provide a mechanism that applies a force to gravity-fed cards to assure consistent feeding, yet have the capability of automatically retracting as to not interfere with card loading.
The present invention describes a moveable weight that is pivotally engaged with a frame of the card-feeding device to provide force against the top of the stack, even as the stack is lowered into the delivery chamber or input chamber of a shuffler. This moveable weight is provided in the form as a pivoting arm, and preferably a motor-driven pivoting arm with weighted roller to both press against the tops of the infeed stack of cards and to assist in sensing the absence of cards in the card infeed stack. In one form of the invention, the weighted arm is retractable.
The moveable weight may be pivotally attached at a point significantly below the elevation of the top of the stack of cards in the input chamber without potential damage to the cards. This reduces the height of the shuffling device and improves ergonomics for the dealer in not having to reach over the elevation of the pivoting device.
It is first to be noted that the presently described advance in technology is independent of the nature of the mechanism and format for actually shuffling the cards, but relates to the card input section of any shuffling machine where playing cards are fed one at a time from the bottom of a stack of playing cards. The stack of cards can rest on a substantially horizontal plane or can be positioned at an angle with respect to the horizontal. The shuffling mechanism could use card ejection technology, distribution of cards into an elevator stack of cards, distribution of cards into a circular carousel of compartments, distribution of cards into a fan array of compartments, distribution of cards into an opening created in a stack, or distribution into any array of compartments, etc.
In the practice of the described technology, a set of playing cards is usually placed as a stack or pile into a chamber. The cards are usually vertically stacked (with the face of each card being in a horizontal plane) within this type of chamber, but they may also be slightly angled (e.g., ±30 degrees from horizontal). The cards are stacked in the input chamber or card input area and then the cards are removed one at a time from the bottom of the set of cards. Preferably, the cards are placed with the face of the cards down, so that not even a single card is ever exposed, but this is not of functional importance to the practice of the present technology.
Typically, the bottommost playing card in the set of cards is the next playing card to be removed. Typically, as shown in the references described above, particularly some of the Grauzer et al. patents, a friction wheel (referred to as a pick-off roller) extends upwardly and into the bottom of the playing card input chamber, and rotation of the pick-off roller provides a driving force against the playing card, forcing the playing card out of the card input chamber and towards the shuffling area.
It is at this point in the shuffling machines where the thickness and mass of the set of cards in the input chamber varies as cards are removed, to the ultimate situation where there are just a few cards, then a single card and then no cards remaining in the chamber. When there are few cards or a single card remaining, the weight of the few cards or single card may be insufficient to retain efficient frictional contact with the pick-off roller, and the last cards may not be moved out of the input chamber when desired.
There are numerous independent elements of the technology described herein that provide advances over the existing technology and attempt to address these problems in a manner that does not create additional problems.
A first concept developed herein is the use of a pivoting weighted arm with a center of rotation of the pivoting arm that is below a point that is spaced above, and preferably at least 15 mm above the card support surface in the card-receiving chamber. The center of rotation may be located above the playing card support surface by at least 18 mm, at least 20 mm or at least 25 mm or more. Preferably, the pivot point is also spaced apart from the card infeed tray. The ability to provide this elevation of the pivot point of the arm in relation to the playing card surface allows for a lower height to the system, better consistency of weight against the cards, and the like. The relative elevation is provided by having an arm that extends above the rotation point on one end of the arm and also above the playing card contact point on the other end of the arm. This creates an elevated middle area or recess in the arm that can extend over the edge of the playing cards in the card input area to avoid contact with those cards.
A second concept developed herein is the use of a motor-driven arm that controls the height of the contact point and/or the force at the contact point and/or the retraction/lowering of the arm and/or other actions by the arm with respect to the loading, unloading and shuffling process, including addressing any card jam events.
Reference to the figures will assist in an understanding of the practice and scope of the technology described herein.
A bottommost playing card 7 is driven by pick-off roller 22 through an outlet slot 24 in the bottom of the playing card input chamber 5. The playing card 7 driven though the slot 24 then engages rollers 28 and 30, which form a nip 26 that moves the playing card into the shuffling area of the shuffler (not shown). A motor 40 drives shaft 42. Shaft 42 rotates, causing sheaves 44, 46 and 48 to rotate. Endless member 50 contacts sheaves 44, 46 and 48.
A stepper motor 32 is provided to drive a drive wheel 34 with drive belt 36 that also engages drive wheel 38, causing the weighted arm 8 to pivot. Once the last card exits the feed area 5, the pivot arm 8 rotates downwardly in a direction of arrow 52 into a retracted position. In the retracted position, as shown in
After the next group of cards is inserted into the feed area 5, the pivot arm 8 continues to rotate in a clockwise direction as shown by arrow 54 until the wheel 12 comes back into contact with the top card in the next stack.
The card weight advantageously retracts and does not interfere with the loading of cards. A card present sensor 56 sends a signal to the processor (not shown) that in turn actuates motor 32 to rotate arm 8 into the “card engaged” position.
Operation of the arm may be controlled by a processor (not shown) and/or react to sensors or be free in its pivoting. When the arm has the spacing 18 built in, the arm may pivot and retain cards under its own weight. Because of the initial elevation of the arm (as shown by the angle of line 16 with respect to the horizontal), the arm will initially (under its own weight) pivot first towards the horizontal and then slightly below the horizontal. The contact point between the roller 12 and the top surface of the uppermost playing card will also move from a non-centered position towards a more centered position, as the height 6 of the uppermost playing cards changes. This orientation of the arm with a roller thereon reduces damage to the surface of the cards that is contacted by the roller.
When the arm is motor driven, an intelligent drive system (as with a processor, microprocessor or computer, with “processor” used generically) may assist in driving the positioning of the arm and apply contact pressure between the arm and the top of the set of playing cards in the card input chamber. The application of pressure can be accomplished a number of ways. For example, the processor may instruct the stepper motor to move a defined number of positions for each fed card.
One mode of operation of the intelligent drive system may include some or all of the following features. When no playing cards are present in the chamber (signals or data of which may be obtained from sensors or cameras), the processor may direct the arm to be rotated into a retracted position to facilitate depositing of the playing cards by hand. When the processor is provided with information such as signals or data indicating that playing cards are positioned in the input chamber 5, the arm is rotated (clockwise in
The system may also indicate the absence of playing cards in the input chamber. For example, sensor 56 may indicate that no cards are in the input chamber 5. The system may utilize the same sensors that indicate the presence of cards in the playing card input to indicate the absence of cards in the chamber. Alternatively, the arm itself may be associated with various sensors to indicate the absence of playing cards in the card input chamber. For example, when there are no cards in the chamber, the arm may continue to rotate clockwise, to a “retracted” position. The arm (as associated sensors or systems that measure the degree of rotation of the arm) may be preprogrammed or trained to recognize the lowest position of the arm with a single card in the chamber. When that position or degree of rotation is subsequently exceeded, a signal will be sent to send the pivot arm to the lowest position (shown in
As noted above, the end of the arm is provided with a roller, but a low friction surface may also be provided in place of the roller. For example, a smooth, flat, rounded edge with a polymeric coating (e.g., fluorinated polymer, polysiloxane polymer, polyurethane, etc.) can provide a low friction surface that will slide over the playing cards without scratching the cards.
Among the properties and structure of the exemplary pivotally mounted card weight arm with the roller or glide surface thereon are:
Various methods and structures of this technology may be variously described as a card-feeding device used as a subcomponent of a shuffling, card delivery or deck verification device having a card infeed area where cards are stacked to be automatically moved within the device. The device may comprise a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards that has a card support surface; a card-removing system that removes cards individually from the bottom of the stack; a pivoting arm that presses against a card at the top of the stack and at least one sensor that detects at least one of a relative position of the arm within the shuffling device and a presence of a card in the card infeed area. The card-feeding device may also have a motor that rotates the pivoting arm. The rotation of the arm by the motor positions the pivoting arm and applies pressure against the card at the top of the stack to improve frictional contact between a lowest card and the rollers of the card-removing system.
One form of the present invention can be characterized as a card-feeding device that is a component of a card-handling device. The card-handling device can dispense cards, shuffle and dispense cards or verify cards. The card-feeding device has a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards that has a card support surface. In one form of the invention, the card support surface is substantially horizontal. In another form of the invention, the card support surface is sloped. The card-feeding device also includes a card-removing system that removes cards individually from the bottom of the stack. The card-removing system is typically controlled by a microprocessor, and may include a motor, belt drive and at least one roller that comes into frictional contact with the lowermost card in the stack. A pivoting arm is provided. The pivoting arm lowers as cards are dispensed, maintaining a force on cards in the infeed area. The arm presses against a card at the top of the stack in a first position. The card-feeding device also includes at least one sensor that detects at least one of a position of the arm within the shuffling device and a presence of a card in the card infeed area.
Although the pivoting arm may move freely about the pivot point, in one form of the invention, the pivot arm is spring loaded such that a force must be applied to the arm in order to raise the arm high enough to insert cards. In another form of the invention, the card-feeding device includes a computer-controlled drive system. An exemplary drive system includes a motor that rotates the pivoting arm about the pivot point or (pivotal shaft). In a first engaged position, a contact end of the pivot arm applies a downward force to the stack of cards. The drive, the weight of the arm or both applies a downward force to the cards. When the pivot arm is rotated by a motorized drive system, the motor positions the pivoting arm to apply pressure against the card at the top of the stack.
According to a microcomputer-controlled card embodiment, the pivoting arm is positionable in a first card engaged position and a second retracted position. The drive system may move the pivot arm about the pivotal axis in two directions, or may rotate the pivot arm about the pivotal axis in only one direction. The pivot point is spaced apart (horizontally) from the card infeed area so that when in the retracted position, the pivot arm is clear of the card infeed area, so as to not interfere with card loading.
Sensors may be provided to signal the microprocessor to instruct the drive system to rotate the pivot arm. An example of one sensor is a position sensor located on the pivotal shaft. This sensor provides an indication of the position or degree of rotation of the pivoting arm. Each provided sensor is in communication with the processor. The processor may also instruct the motor to alter the position of the pivoting arm upon receiving a sensor signal. Another example of a suitable sensor is a card present sensor located on or beneath the card support surface.
One preferred drive motor is a stepper motor. The stepper motor may rotate in two directions or just in a single direction. When the motor rotates the pivoting arm in a single direction, the pivot arm is capable of moving from a recessed position back into a card-engaging position without interfering with card loading. Preferably, the pivot arm is completely concealed within an interior of the machine when in the recessed position. When in the recessed position, no part of the pivot arm extends into the card infeed area, leaving the area free for typical card loading.
Another aspect of the present invention is a card-feeding device comprising a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards, the card infeed area having a card support surface. The feeding device includes a card-removing system that removes cards from the bottom of the stack of cards, preferably individually. A rotating pivot arm is provided that presses against a card at the top of the stack at a first end, the arm having a second rotating pivot end and a bridging length. The bridging length is elongated and has a recess that is elevated above a line connecting a bottom of the first contact end and a second pivot point on the pivot end when in the card-engaged position. This recess allows for clearance of the cards when the pivot point is mounted closer to the card support surface than an upper surface of the card-feeding device. In one embodiment, the card-contacting end of the pivot arm includes a roller. In one form of the invention, the roller is free-rolling and is formed of an elastomer such as rubber.
A method of shuffling cards is disclosed. The method includes the step of providing cards to be shuffled into a single card infeed as a stack, the stack having a top and bottom surface. The method includes removing cards, one at a time, from the bottom of the stack and moving the removed cards to a shuffling zone. The cards are then shuffled. Examples of known suitable shuffling apparatuses are known in the art and include rack structures, carousel shufflers with multiple compartments, devices that grab groups of cards from a vertical stack, lift the grabbed group and provide a point of insertion, and ejection devices that randomly select an elevation within a stack of cards and eject individual cards out of the stack.
According to the method, the stack of cards inserted into the shuffler is stabilized by a pivoting arm pressing against the top of the stack. When the last card is fed, the microprocessor receives a signal from a sensor and instructs the drive system to automatically move the arm on command. In one embodiment of the method, the processor sends commands to the drive system in response to a received sensor signal. In another form of the invention, a user input is received by the processor, and in turn, the drive system is activated. User commands may result from a sensor or dealer input, as by a button, keyboard, touchscreen or the like.
The pivot arm may include a wheel at the card-contacting end. When the pivot arm is in the engaged position, the wheel contacts the uppermost card in the stack. The sensor may detect the presence or absence of playing cards in the card infeed area. One example of a suitable sensor is an optical sensor. The sensor signals received by the processor may also be from a sensor that senses the position of a rotational shaft of the pivot arm.
Another aspect of the invention is a card feed system, comprising a card infeed area with a card support surface. The system includes a card removal system capable of removing cards individually from a bottom of a stack of cards. A rotating pivot arm is provided that in a first engaged position applies a downward force to a stack of cards being fed and in a second recessed position is free of the card infeed area. The card feed system may advantageously be used as a card feeder for a card-shuffling mechanism, a card delivery system such as a mechanical card shoe, a deck verification device, a card sorter or combination shuffler/hand-forming device.
Although specific examples, sequences and steps have been clearly described, variations and alternatives would be apparent to those skilled in the art and are intended to be within the scope of the invention claimed.
This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/444,167 filed May 31, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,353,513, issued Jan. 15, 2013.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 793489 | Williams | Jun 1905 | A |
| 1014219 | Hall | Jan 1912 | A |
| 1885276 | McKay | Nov 1932 | A |
| 2001220 | Smith | May 1935 | A |
| 2001918 | Nevius | May 1935 | A |
| 2016030 | Woodruff et al. | Oct 1935 | A |
| 2043343 | Warner | Jun 1936 | A |
| 2065824 | Plass | Dec 1936 | A |
| 2254484 | Hutchins | Sep 1941 | A |
| 2328153 | Laing | Aug 1943 | A |
| 2328879 | Isaacson | Sep 1943 | A |
| 2364413 | Wittel | Dec 1944 | A |
| 2778644 | Stephenson | Jan 1957 | A |
| 2937739 | Levy | May 1960 | A |
| 2950005 | MacDonald | Aug 1960 | A |
| 3147978 | Sjostrand | Sep 1964 | A |
| 3235741 | Plaisance | Feb 1966 | A |
| 3312473 | Friedman et al. | Apr 1967 | A |
| 3530968 | Palmer | Sep 1970 | A |
| 3595388 | Castaldi | Jul 1971 | A |
| 3690670 | Cassady et al. | Sep 1972 | A |
| 3716238 | Porter | Feb 1973 | A |
| 3897954 | Erickson | Aug 1975 | A |
| 3944230 | Fineman | Mar 1976 | A |
| 4159581 | Lichtenberg | Jul 1979 | A |
| 4232861 | Maul | Nov 1980 | A |
| 4310160 | Willette et al. | Jan 1982 | A |
| 4361393 | Noto | Nov 1982 | A |
| 4368972 | Naramore | Jan 1983 | A |
| 4385827 | Naramore | May 1983 | A |
| 4388994 | Suda et al. | Jun 1983 | A |
| 4397469 | Carter | Aug 1983 | A |
| 4494197 | Troy et al. | Jan 1985 | A |
| 4497488 | Plevyak et al. | Feb 1985 | A |
| 4512580 | Matviak | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4513969 | Samsel | Apr 1985 | A |
| 4515367 | Howard | May 1985 | A |
| 4534562 | Cuff et al. | Aug 1985 | A |
| 4566782 | Britt et al. | Jan 1986 | A |
| 4586712 | Lorber et al. | May 1986 | A |
| 4659082 | Greenberg | Apr 1987 | A |
| 4662637 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4667959 | Pfeiffer et al. | May 1987 | A |
| 4741524 | Bromage | May 1988 | A |
| 4750743 | Nicoletti | Jun 1988 | A |
| 4755941 | Bacchi | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4759448 | Kawabata | Jul 1988 | A |
| 4770421 | Hoffman | Sep 1988 | A |
| 4807884 | Breeding | Feb 1989 | A |
| 4822050 | Normand et al. | Apr 1989 | A |
| 4832342 | Plevyak et al. | May 1989 | A |
| 4876000 | Mikhail et al. | Oct 1989 | A |
| 4900009 | Kitahara et al. | Feb 1990 | A |
| 4926327 | Sidley | May 1990 | A |
| 4951950 | Normand et al. | Aug 1990 | A |
| 4969648 | Hollinger et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
| 4995615 | Cheng et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
| 5000453 | Stevens et al. | Mar 1991 | A |
| 5067713 | Soules et al. | Nov 1991 | A |
| 5081487 | Hoyer et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
| 5121192 | Kazui | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5121921 | Friedman | Jun 1992 | A |
| 5179517 | Sarbin et al. | Jan 1993 | A |
| 5199710 | Lamle | Apr 1993 | A |
| 5209476 | Eiba et al. | May 1993 | A |
| 5224712 | Laughlin et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
| 5240140 | Huen | Aug 1993 | A |
| 5257179 | DeMar et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
| 5261667 | Breeding | Nov 1993 | A |
| 5275411 | Breeding | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5276312 | McCarthy et al. | Jan 1994 | A |
| 5283422 | Storch et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5288081 | Breeding et al. | Feb 1994 | A |
| 5299089 | Lwee | Mar 1994 | A |
| 5303921 | Breeding | Apr 1994 | A |
| 5356145 | Verschoor | Oct 1994 | A |
| 5362053 | Miller et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
| 5374061 | Albrecht et al. | Dec 1994 | A |
| 5382024 | Blaha | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5382025 | Sklansky et al. | Jan 1995 | A |
| 5390910 | Mandel | Feb 1995 | A |
| 5431399 | Kelley et al. | Jul 1995 | A |
| 5437462 | Breeding et al. | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5445377 | Steinbach | Aug 1995 | A |
| 5470079 | LeStrange et al. | Nov 1995 | A |
| 5584483 | Sines et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586766 | Forte et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5586936 | Bennett et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
| 5605334 | McCrea et al. | Feb 1997 | A |
| 5613912 | Slater et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
| 5651548 | French et al. | Jul 1997 | A |
| 5655961 | Acres et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
| 5669816 | Garczynski et al. | Sep 1997 | A |
| 5676372 | Sines et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5681039 | Miller et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
| 5683085 | Johnson et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5690324 | Otomo et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
| 5692748 | Frisco et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5695189 | Breeding et al. | Dec 1997 | A |
| 5707287 | McCrea et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
| 5718427 | Cranford et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
| 5722893 | Hill et al. | Mar 1998 | A |
| 5735525 | McCrea et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5735742 | French et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
| 5772505 | Garczynski et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
| 5779546 | Meissner et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5781647 | Fishbine et al. | Jul 1998 | A |
| 5788574 | Ornstein et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
| 5803808 | Strisower | Sep 1998 | A |
| 5836775 | Hiyama et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
| 5911626 | McCrea et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
| 5919090 | Mothwurf | Jul 1999 | A |
| 5936222 | Korsunsky et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5941769 | Order et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| 5944310 | Johnson et al. | Aug 1999 | A |
| D414527 | Tedham | Sep 1999 | S |
| 5989122 | Roblejo et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
| 6015311 | Benjamin et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
| 6019368 | Sines et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
| 6039650 | Hill et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
| 6068258 | Breeding et al. | May 2000 | A |
| 6071190 | Weiss et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
| 6093103 | McCrea et al. | Jul 2000 | A |
| 6117012 | McCrea et al. | Sep 2000 | A |
| 6126166 | Lorson et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6127447 | Mitry et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6139014 | Breeding et al. | Oct 2000 | A |
| 6149154 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2000 | A |
| 6165069 | Sines et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6165072 | Davis et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
| 6213310 | Wennersten et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6217447 | Lofink et al. | Apr 2001 | B1 |
| 6250632 | Albrecht | Jun 2001 | B1 |
| 6254096 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6254484 | McCrea, Jr. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267248 | Johnson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267648 | Katayama et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6267671 | Hogan | Jul 2001 | B1 |
| 6270404 | Sines et al. | Aug 2001 | B2 |
| 6293864 | Romero | Sep 2001 | B1 |
| 6299167 | Sines et al. | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6299536 | Hill | Oct 2001 | B1 |
| 6313871 | Schubert | Nov 2001 | B1 |
| 6325373 | Breeding et al. | Dec 2001 | B1 |
| 6346044 | McCrea, Jr. | Feb 2002 | B1 |
| 6361044 | Block et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
| 6403908 | Stardust et al. | Jun 2002 | B2 |
| 6443839 | Stockdale et al. | Sep 2002 | B2 |
| 6446864 | Kim et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
| 6460848 | Soltys et al. | Oct 2002 | B1 |
| 6517435 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6517436 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6520857 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2003 | B2 |
| 6527271 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6530836 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6530837 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6532297 | Lindquist | Mar 2003 | B1 |
| 6533276 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6533662 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2003 | B2 |
| 6568678 | Breeding et al. | May 2003 | B2 |
| 6579180 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6579181 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582301 | Hill | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6582302 | Romero | Jun 2003 | B2 |
| 6585586 | Romero | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6585856 | Zwick et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6588750 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6588751 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2003 | B1 |
| 6595857 | Soltys et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
| 6616535 | Nishizaki et al. | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6622185 | Johnson | Sep 2003 | B1 |
| 6629889 | Mothwurf | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6629894 | Purton | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6637622 | Robinson | Oct 2003 | B1 |
| 6638161 | Soltys et al. | Oct 2003 | B2 |
| 6645068 | Kelly et al. | Nov 2003 | B1 |
| 6645077 | Rowe | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6651981 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6651982 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6652379 | Soltys et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
| 6655684 | Grauzer et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6659460 | Blaha et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6663490 | Soltys et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
| 6666768 | Akers | Dec 2003 | B1 |
| 6676127 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6676517 | Beavers | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6680843 | Farrow et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
| 6685567 | Cockerille et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6685568 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6688979 | Soltys et al. | Feb 2004 | B2 |
| 6698756 | Baker et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
| 6712696 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
| 6719634 | Mishina et al. | Apr 2004 | B2 |
| 6726205 | Purton | Apr 2004 | B1 |
| 6732067 | Powderly | May 2004 | B1 |
| 6746333 | Onda et al. | Jun 2004 | B1 |
| 6758751 | Soltys et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6758757 | Luciano, Jr. et al. | Jul 2004 | B2 |
| 6804763 | Stockdale et al. | Oct 2004 | B1 |
| 6848844 | McCue, Jr. et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
| 6886829 | Hessing et al. | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6889979 | Blaha | May 2005 | B2 |
| 6957746 | Martin et al. | Oct 2005 | B2 |
| 6959925 | Baker et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
| 6959935 | Buhl et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 6964612 | Soltys et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
| 7011309 | Soltys et al. | Mar 2006 | B2 |
| 7029009 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2006 | B2 |
| 7036818 | Grauzer et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
| 7059602 | Grauzer et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7066464 | Blad et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
| 7073791 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2006 | B2 |
| 7139108 | Andersen et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
| 7213812 | Schubert et al. | May 2007 | B2 |
| 7237969 | Bartman | Jul 2007 | B2 |
| 7255344 | Grauzer et al. | Aug 2007 | B2 |
| 7322576 | Grauzer et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
| 7338044 | Grauzer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
| 7367561 | Blaha et al. | May 2008 | B2 |
| 7384044 | Grauzer et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
| 7413191 | Grauzer et al. | Aug 2008 | B2 |
| 7448626 | Fleckenstein | Nov 2008 | B2 |
| 7510186 | Fleckenstein | Mar 2009 | B2 |
| 7523935 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2009 | B2 |
| 7661676 | Smith et al. | Feb 2010 | B2 |
| 7766332 | Grauzer et al. | Aug 2010 | B2 |
| 8353513 | Swanson | Jan 2013 | B2 |
| 20010036231 | Easwar et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20010036866 | Stockdale et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
| 20020107067 | McGlone et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
| 20020187830 | Stockdale et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
| 20030052450 | Grauzer et al. | Mar 2003 | A1 |
| 20030064798 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
| 20030087694 | Storch | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030090059 | Grauzer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030094756 | Grauzer et al. | May 2003 | A1 |
| 20030195025 | Hill | Oct 2003 | A1 |
| 20040067789 | Grauzer et al. | Apr 2004 | A1 |
| 20040116179 | Nicely et al. | Jun 2004 | A1 |
| 20040224777 | Smith et al. | Nov 2004 | A1 |
| 20050035548 | Yoseloff et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050037843 | Wells et al. | Feb 2005 | A1 |
| 20050104290 | Grauzer et al. | May 2005 | A1 |
| 20050137005 | Soltys et al. | Jun 2005 | A1 |
| 20050146093 | Grauzer et al. | Jul 2005 | A1 |
| 20050206077 | Grauzer et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
| 20050242500 | Downs | Nov 2005 | A1 |
| 20060033269 | Grauzer et al. | Feb 2006 | A1 |
| 20060046853 | Black | Mar 2006 | A1 |
| 20060181022 | Grauzer et al. | Aug 2006 | A1 |
| 20060279040 | Downs et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
| 20070006708 | Laakso | Jan 2007 | A1 |
| 20070102879 | Stasson | May 2007 | A1 |
| 20070278739 | Swanson | Dec 2007 | A1 |
| 20080006997 | Scheper et al. | Jan 2008 | A1 |
| 20080113700 | Czyzewski et al. | May 2008 | A1 |
| 20080303210 | Grauzer et al. | Dec 2008 | A1 |
| 20090191933 | French | Jul 2009 | A1 |
| 20100244382 | Snow | Sep 2010 | A1 |
| 20100276880 | Grauzer et al. | Nov 2010 | A1 |
| 20110109042 | Rynda et al. | May 2011 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 8700764 | Feb 1987 | WO |
| 9840136 | Sep 1998 | WO |
| 0051076 | Aug 2000 | WO |
| Entry |
|---|
| Scarne's Encyclopedia of Games by John Scarne, 1973, “Super Contract Bridge”, p. 153. |
| Service Manual/User Manual for Single Deck Shufflers: BG1, BG2 and BG3 by Shuffle Master, 1997. |
| Specification of Australian Patent Application No. 31577/95, filed Jan. 17, 1995, Applicants: Rodney G. Johnson et al., Title: Card Handling Apparatus. |
| Specification of Australian Patent Application No. Not Listed, filed Aug. 15, 1994, Applicants: Rodney G. Johnson et al., Title: Card Handling Apparatus. |
| PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2008/007069, dated Sep. 8, 2008, 10 pages. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US07/15035, dated Sep. 29, 2008, 3 pages. |
| PCT International Search Report for PCT/US07/15036, dated Sep. 23, 2008, 3 pages. |
| Press Release for Alliance Gaming Corp., Jul. 26, 2004—Alliance Gaming Announces Control with Galaxy Macau for New Mind Play Baccarat Table Technology, http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews. |
| Tracking the Tables, by Jack Bularsky, Casino Journal, May 2004, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 44-47. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20130134674 A1 | May 2013 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Parent | 11444167 | May 2006 | US |
| Child | 13741236 | US |