Card weight for gravity feed input for playing card shuffler

Information

  • Patent Grant
  • 8662500
  • Patent Number
    8,662,500
  • Date Filed
    Monday, January 14, 2013
    12 years ago
  • Date Issued
    Tuesday, March 4, 2014
    11 years ago
Abstract
A card-feeding device for feeding cards into a card-handling device is disclosed. Examples of card-handling devices include shufflers, card sorters, card delivery devices and card verification devices. The device includes a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards. The card infeed area has a card support surface. Included in the device is a card-removing system that removes cards individually from the bottom of the stack. A pivoting arm presses against a card at the top of the stack. At least one sensor is provided that detects at least one of a position of the arm and a presence of a card in the card infeed area. A method of shuffling cards is also disclosed. The method includes the steps of providing cards to be shuffled into a card infeed area as a stack with a top and bottom and removing cards one at a time from the bottom of the stack and moving the removed cards to a shuffling zone. Cards are then shuffled. The stack of cards is stabilized by a pivoting arm capable of pressing against the top of the stack in an engaged position. The pivot arm may be automatically rotated from a first card-engaging position to a second recessed position.
Description
BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

1. Field of the Invention


The present invention relates to playing card-feeding systems, particularly card-feeding systems for shuffling devices that may be used in a casino or card club environment, and particularly playing card-shuffling devices that use a gravity-feed system for providing playing cards from a playing card input chamber.


2. Background of the Art


In the movement of cards within playing card-handling devices, a typical card-feeding system may include pick-off roller(s) that are located on the bottom of stacks to remove one card at a time. The weight of a stack of cards ordinarily provides sufficient traction against the rollers to assure proper movement of most of the cards. But as the stack thins out after most of the cards have been delivered, the weight may no longer be sufficient (especially with the last few remaining cards in the stack) to assure proper movement of the cards.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,692,748 (Frisco) describes a card-shuffling device containing free-swinging weights on pivoting arms to apply pressure to the top of stacks of cards that are to be mixed. The disclosure, particularly that relating to FIGS. 4b-4d, states: “To assure traction between the wheels 48a, b, the circumference thereof has a coefficient friction to engage and pull a card, transport it and ejected it from the respective chutes 44a, b into the shaft 24. While preferably pairs of wheels 48a, b are used, it is to be understood that a single wheel or a cylinder could also be used as the tractive element. To impose a load on cards 30 deposited in the first and second chambers 34, 36 to assure traction with the wheels 48a, b, means are provided to vertically load the cards and urge them against the floors 40. For this purpose, each of the first and second chambers 34, 36 has an arm 52 pivotly mounted at one end by a pivot 54 to the housing 12 and having at the other end a foot 56. As described hereinafter, when cards are cut and deposited into the first and second chambers 34, 36, the arms 52 pivot as the cards 30 are urged over the front barriers 42 into their nested positions in the first and second chambers 34, 36. As nested on the floors 40 of the first and second chambers 34, 36, the arms remain in contact with the top of the cards 30 to impose a vertical load on the cards 30 to urge them to be contacted by the wheels 48a, b. Proximate the foot 56 of each aim 52, a weight 58 is provided on each of the arms 52. While a single arm 52 is shown it is to be understood that a pair of such arms 52 could be used at each of the chambers.” These weights on pivoting arms apply pressure through the stack(s) of cards to assure traction against a pick-off roller at the bottom of the stack. This shows a pivoting weighted arm over the card infeed portions of a playing card shuffler.


U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,655,684; 6,588,751; 6,588,750; 6,568,678; 6,325,373; 6,254,096; 6,149,154; (Grauzer) and 6,139,014; 6,068,258; 5,695,189 (Breeding) describe a shuffler or card delivery shoe having a standard free-floating weight to provide increased force on the cards to keep them oriented and assist in their advancing. The Breeding references disclose sensors for detecting the presence of cards in a delivery tray or elsewhere.


U.S. Pat. No. 6,637,622 (Robinson) describes a card delivery device with a weighted roller assisting in allowing the cards to be easily removed. The weighted cover is on the delivery end of the dealing shoe, covering the next card to be delivered.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,722,893 (Hill) describes the use of a weighted block behind cards in a delivery shoe to provide additional weight on the cards to trigger sensors. The reference specifically states: “In operation, a wedge-shaped block mounted on a heavy stainless steel roller (not shown) in a first position indicates that no cards are in the shoe. When the cards are placed in the shoe, the wedge-shaped block will be placed behind the cards and it and the cards will press against the load switch.


U.S. Pat. No. 5,431,399 (Kelley) describes a bridge hand-forming device in which cards are placed into an infeed area and the cards are randomly or predeterminately distributed to four receiving trays. A weight is shown placed over the infeed cards.


In shufflers where there is a single stack of cards to be shuffled and the weight of the cards presses the lowermost cards into contact with card-moving elements such as pick-off rollers, friction contact plates, and the like, it has been suggested by the inventors that as the stack of cards diminishes and fewer cards are present to provide contact forces with the lowermost card-moving element, this failure of strong contact forces may be a cause for delivery failures in the last cards in a set of cards in the delivery chamber. It would be desirable to provide a mechanism that applies a force to gravity-fed cards to assure consistent feeding, yet have the capability of automatically retracting as to not interfere with card loading.


SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

The present invention describes a moveable weight that is pivotally engaged with a frame of the card-feeding device to provide force against the top of the stack, even as the stack is lowered into the delivery chamber or input chamber of a shuffler. This moveable weight is provided in the form as a pivoting arm, and preferably a motor-driven pivoting arm with weighted roller to both press against the tops of the infeed stack of cards and to assist in sensing the absence of cards in the card infeed stack. In one form of the invention, the weighted arm is retractable.


The moveable weight may be pivotally attached at a point significantly below the elevation of the top of the stack of cards in the input chamber without potential damage to the cards. This reduces the height of the shuffling device and improves ergonomics for the dealer in not having to reach over the elevation of the pivoting device.





BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE FIGURES


FIG. 1 shows a cutaway side elevational view of the input end of a gravity feed shuffling system that embodies one structure used in the practice of the technology described herein.



FIG. 2 shows a second side elevational view of an example of the present invention.





DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

It is first to be noted that the presently described advance in technology is independent of the nature of the mechanism and format for actually shuffling the cards, but relates to the card input section of any shuffling machine where playing cards are fed one at a time from the bottom of a stack of playing cards. The stack of cards can rest on a substantially horizontal plane or can be positioned at an angle with respect to the horizontal. The shuffling mechanism could use card ejection technology, distribution of cards into an elevator stack of cards, distribution of cards into a circular carousel of compartments, distribution of cards into a fan array of compartments, distribution of cards into an opening created in a stack, or distribution into any array of compartments, etc.


In the practice of the described technology, a set of playing cards is usually placed as a stack or pile into a chamber. The cards are usually vertically stacked (with the face of each card being in a horizontal plane) within this type of chamber, but they may also be slightly angled (e.g., ±30 degrees from horizontal). The cards are stacked in the input chamber or card input area and then the cards are removed one at a time from the bottom of the set of cards. Preferably, the cards are placed with the face of the cards down, so that not even a single card is ever exposed, but this is not of functional importance to the practice of the present technology.


Typically, the bottommost playing card in the set of cards is the next playing card to be removed. Typically, as shown in the references described above, particularly some of the Grauzer et al. patents, a friction wheel (referred to as a pick-off roller) extends upwardly and into the bottom of the playing card input chamber, and rotation of the pick-off roller provides a driving force against the playing card, forcing the playing card out of the card input chamber and towards the shuffling area.


It is at this point in the shuffling machines where the thickness and mass of the set of cards in the input chamber varies as cards are removed, to the ultimate situation where there are just a few cards, then a single card and then no cards remaining in the chamber. When there are few cards or a single card remaining, the weight of the few cards or single card may be insufficient to retain efficient frictional contact with the pick-off roller, and the last cards may not be moved out of the input chamber when desired.


There are numerous independent elements of the technology described herein that provide advances over the existing technology and attempt to address these problems in a manner that does not create additional problems.


A first concept developed herein is the use of a pivoting weighted arm with a center of rotation of the pivoting arm that is below a point that is spaced above, and preferably at least 15 mm above the card support surface in the card-receiving chamber. The center of rotation may be located above the playing card support surface by at least 18 mm, at least 20 mm or at least 25 mm or more. Preferably, the pivot point is also spaced apart from the card infeed tray. The ability to provide this elevation of the pivot point of the arm in relation to the playing card surface allows for a lower height to the system, better consistency of weight against the cards, and the like. The relative elevation is provided by having an arm that extends above the rotation point on one end of the arm and also above the playing card contact point on the other end of the arm. This creates an elevated middle area or recess in the arm that can extend over the edge of the playing cards in the card input area to avoid contact with those cards.


A second concept developed herein is the use of a motor-driven arm that controls the height of the contact point and/or the force at the contact point and/or the retraction/lowering of the arm and/or other actions by the arm with respect to the loading, unloading and shuffling process, including addressing any card jam events.


Reference to the figures will assist in an understanding of the practice and scope of the technology described herein.



FIG. 1 shows a sectioned or cutaway side elevational view of the playing card-feeding portion 2 of a playing card-handling system. The height of a set of cards (e.g., a deck or decks of cards) 6 is shown in the playing card-receiving or input chamber 5. A pivoting arm 8 is shown with a roller 12 pivotally mounted about rotational shaft 14 at the contact end of the arm 8 resting on the top of the set of cards 6. This may represent a locked or controlled (as explained later) position of the arm 8. The arm 8 pivots about pivotal shaft 10 and the roller 12 pivots about pivotal shaft 14. A line 16 is shown between the rotation point 10 and the lower surface of the roller 12. As can be seen, this line intersects the height of the playing cards 6, which would mean that the traditional straight weighted arm (as shown by Frisco, above) would rest against the edge of the cards and possibly interfere with, damage or mark the cards. As is shown in FIG. 1, there is a significant gap 18 above the line 16 and the height of the set of playing cards 6 in the input chamber 5. This structure prevents the need for elevating the pivot point 10 of the arm 8 above the height of the uppermost card in the stack 6. When the arm and pivot point 10 have to be so elevated, the overall height of the shuffler is increased. Additionally, other functioning parts of the arm system, (i.e., the belts if used, drive wheels and the shaft, for example) may be exposed and subject to damage from the exposure.


A bottommost playing card 7 is driven by pick-off roller 22 through an outlet slot 24 in the bottom of the playing card input chamber 5. The playing card 7 driven though the slot 24 then engages rollers 28 and 30, which form a nip 26 that moves the playing card into the shuffling area of the shuffler (not shown). A motor 40 drives shaft 42. Shaft 42 rotates, causing sheaves 44, 46 and 48 to rotate. Endless member 50 contacts sheaves 44, 46 and 48.


A stepper motor 32 is provided to drive a drive wheel 34 with drive belt 36 that also engages drive wheel 38, causing the weighted arm 8 to pivot. Once the last card exits the feed area 5, the pivot arm 8 rotates downwardly in a direction of arrow 52 into a retracted position. In the retracted position, as shown in FIG. 2, the pivot arm 8 is completely free of the card infeed area 5. Cards can be manually loaded without any interference from the pivot-mounted card weight 8.


After the next group of cards is inserted into the feed area 5, the pivot arm 8 continues to rotate in a clockwise direction as shown by arrow 54 until the wheel 12 comes back into contact with the top card in the next stack.


The card weight advantageously retracts and does not interfere with the loading of cards. A card present sensor 56 sends a signal to the processor (not shown) that in turn actuates motor 32 to rotate arm 8 into the “card engaged” position.


Operation of the arm may be controlled by a processor (not shown) and/or react to sensors or be free in its pivoting. When the arm has the spacing 18 built in, the arm may pivot and retain cards under its own weight. Because of the initial elevation of the arm (as shown by the angle of line 16 with respect to the horizontal), the arm will initially (under its own weight) pivot first towards the horizontal and then slightly below the horizontal. The contact point between the roller 12 and the top surface of the uppermost playing card will also move from a non-centered position towards a more centered position, as the height 6 of the uppermost playing cards changes. This orientation of the arm with a roller thereon reduces damage to the surface of the cards that is contacted by the roller.


When the arm is motor driven, an intelligent drive system (as with a processor, microprocessor or computer, with “processor” used generically) may assist in driving the positioning of the arm and apply contact pressure between the arm and the top of the set of playing cards in the card input chamber. The application of pressure can be accomplished a number of ways. For example, the processor may instruct the stepper motor to move a defined number of positions for each fed card.


One mode of operation of the intelligent drive system may include some or all of the following features. When no playing cards are present in the chamber (signals or data of which may be obtained from sensors or cameras), the processor may direct the arm to be rotated into a retracted position to facilitate depositing of the playing cards by hand. When the processor is provided with information such as signals or data indicating that playing cards are positioned in the input chamber 5, the arm is rotated (clockwise in FIG. 1) until contact is sufficiently made with the top of playing cards. This sensing may be accomplished in numerous ways, as with a contact sensor in the shaft 14, tension reduction sensed in the pulley 36 through the motor 34, cameras or optical sensors in the input chamber, and the like. Once contact is made, the arm may remain under tension by the drive system or become free in its rotating by disengaging gearing or pulleys driving the arm. Or upon removal of cards, the processor will adjust the tension in the pulley 36 to adjust the contact force of the roller 12 against playing cards. This adjustment may be done continually, periodically or at specific event occurrences, such as the movement of a single card, the movement of a specific number of cards out of the input chamber, or the like. The force applied by the roller to the top playing cards should usually be sufficient that removal of a single card from the bottom of the set of cards will not completely remove the force applied by the roller 12.


The system may also indicate the absence of playing cards in the input chamber. For example, sensor 56 may indicate that no cards are in the input chamber 5. The system may utilize the same sensors that indicate the presence of cards in the playing card input to indicate the absence of cards in the chamber. Alternatively, the arm itself may be associated with various sensors to indicate the absence of playing cards in the card input chamber. For example, when there are no cards in the chamber, the arm may continue to rotate clockwise, to a “retracted” position. The arm (as associated sensors or systems that measure the degree of rotation of the arm) may be preprogrammed or trained to recognize the lowest position of the arm with a single card in the chamber. When that position or degree of rotation is subsequently exceeded, a signal will be sent to send the pivot arm to the lowest position (shown in FIG. 2).


As noted above, the end of the arm is provided with a roller, but a low friction surface may also be provided in place of the roller. For example, a smooth, flat, rounded edge with a polymeric coating (e.g., fluorinated polymer, polysiloxane polymer, polyurethane, etc.) can provide a low friction surface that will slide over the playing cards without scratching the cards.


Among the properties and structure of the exemplary pivotally mounted card weight arm with the roller or glide surface thereon are:

    • 1) Essentially downward (towards the cards) free-swinging or controlled arm, with a lower edge gap that extends over edges of playing cards when the arm is elevated;
    • 2) A sensing device identifying the position of the arm along its movement path;
    • 3) The sensed position including sensing of a position of the arm or contact of the arm, indicating the presence, absence or approximate amount (number) of cards in the infeed area;
    • 4) The sensor signaling a processor that commands a motor attached to a belt that can motivate the weighted arm into a contact position, and a retracted position; and
    • 5) An automatic sequence that rotates the weighted arm into a retracted position to allow insertion of additional cards into the shuffler.


Various methods and structures of this technology may be variously described as a card-feeding device used as a subcomponent of a shuffling, card delivery or deck verification device having a card infeed area where cards are stacked to be automatically moved within the device. The device may comprise a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards that has a card support surface; a card-removing system that removes cards individually from the bottom of the stack; a pivoting arm that presses against a card at the top of the stack and at least one sensor that detects at least one of a relative position of the arm within the shuffling device and a presence of a card in the card infeed area. The card-feeding device may also have a motor that rotates the pivoting arm. The rotation of the arm by the motor positions the pivoting arm and applies pressure against the card at the top of the stack to improve frictional contact between a lowest card and the rollers of the card-removing system.


One form of the present invention can be characterized as a card-feeding device that is a component of a card-handling device. The card-handling device can dispense cards, shuffle and dispense cards or verify cards. The card-feeding device has a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards that has a card support surface. In one form of the invention, the card support surface is substantially horizontal. In another form of the invention, the card support surface is sloped. The card-feeding device also includes a card-removing system that removes cards individually from the bottom of the stack. The card-removing system is typically controlled by a microprocessor, and may include a motor, belt drive and at least one roller that comes into frictional contact with the lowermost card in the stack. A pivoting arm is provided. The pivoting arm lowers as cards are dispensed, maintaining a force on cards in the infeed area. The arm presses against a card at the top of the stack in a first position. The card-feeding device also includes at least one sensor that detects at least one of a position of the arm within the shuffling device and a presence of a card in the card infeed area.


Although the pivoting arm may move freely about the pivot point, in one form of the invention, the pivot arm is spring loaded such that a force must be applied to the arm in order to raise the arm high enough to insert cards. In another form of the invention, the card-feeding device includes a computer-controlled drive system. An exemplary drive system includes a motor that rotates the pivoting arm about the pivot point or (pivotal shaft). In a first engaged position, a contact end of the pivot arm applies a downward force to the stack of cards. The drive, the weight of the arm or both applies a downward force to the cards. When the pivot arm is rotated by a motorized drive system, the motor positions the pivoting arm to apply pressure against the card at the top of the stack.


According to a microcomputer-controlled card embodiment, the pivoting arm is positionable in a first card engaged position and a second retracted position. The drive system may move the pivot arm about the pivotal axis in two directions, or may rotate the pivot arm about the pivotal axis in only one direction. The pivot point is spaced apart (horizontally) from the card infeed area so that when in the retracted position, the pivot arm is clear of the card infeed area, so as to not interfere with card loading.


Sensors may be provided to signal the microprocessor to instruct the drive system to rotate the pivot arm. An example of one sensor is a position sensor located on the pivotal shaft. This sensor provides an indication of the position or degree of rotation of the pivoting arm. Each provided sensor is in communication with the processor. The processor may also instruct the motor to alter the position of the pivoting arm upon receiving a sensor signal. Another example of a suitable sensor is a card present sensor located on or beneath the card support surface.


One preferred drive motor is a stepper motor. The stepper motor may rotate in two directions or just in a single direction. When the motor rotates the pivoting arm in a single direction, the pivot arm is capable of moving from a recessed position back into a card-engaging position without interfering with card loading. Preferably, the pivot arm is completely concealed within an interior of the machine when in the recessed position. When in the recessed position, no part of the pivot arm extends into the card infeed area, leaving the area free for typical card loading.


Another aspect of the present invention is a card-feeding device comprising a card infeed area that supports a stack of cards, the card infeed area having a card support surface. The feeding device includes a card-removing system that removes cards from the bottom of the stack of cards, preferably individually. A rotating pivot arm is provided that presses against a card at the top of the stack at a first end, the arm having a second rotating pivot end and a bridging length. The bridging length is elongated and has a recess that is elevated above a line connecting a bottom of the first contact end and a second pivot point on the pivot end when in the card-engaged position. This recess allows for clearance of the cards when the pivot point is mounted closer to the card support surface than an upper surface of the card-feeding device. In one embodiment, the card-contacting end of the pivot arm includes a roller. In one form of the invention, the roller is free-rolling and is formed of an elastomer such as rubber.


A method of shuffling cards is disclosed. The method includes the step of providing cards to be shuffled into a single card infeed as a stack, the stack having a top and bottom surface. The method includes removing cards, one at a time, from the bottom of the stack and moving the removed cards to a shuffling zone. The cards are then shuffled. Examples of known suitable shuffling apparatuses are known in the art and include rack structures, carousel shufflers with multiple compartments, devices that grab groups of cards from a vertical stack, lift the grabbed group and provide a point of insertion, and ejection devices that randomly select an elevation within a stack of cards and eject individual cards out of the stack.


According to the method, the stack of cards inserted into the shuffler is stabilized by a pivoting arm pressing against the top of the stack. When the last card is fed, the microprocessor receives a signal from a sensor and instructs the drive system to automatically move the arm on command. In one embodiment of the method, the processor sends commands to the drive system in response to a received sensor signal. In another form of the invention, a user input is received by the processor, and in turn, the drive system is activated. User commands may result from a sensor or dealer input, as by a button, keyboard, touchscreen or the like.


The pivot arm may include a wheel at the card-contacting end. When the pivot arm is in the engaged position, the wheel contacts the uppermost card in the stack. The sensor may detect the presence or absence of playing cards in the card infeed area. One example of a suitable sensor is an optical sensor. The sensor signals received by the processor may also be from a sensor that senses the position of a rotational shaft of the pivot arm.


Another aspect of the invention is a card feed system, comprising a card infeed area with a card support surface. The system includes a card removal system capable of removing cards individually from a bottom of a stack of cards. A rotating pivot arm is provided that in a first engaged position applies a downward force to a stack of cards being fed and in a second recessed position is free of the card infeed area. The card feed system may advantageously be used as a card feeder for a card-shuffling mechanism, a card delivery system such as a mechanical card shoe, a deck verification device, a card sorter or combination shuffler/hand-forming device.


Although specific examples, sequences and steps have been clearly described, variations and alternatives would be apparent to those skilled in the art and are intended to be within the scope of the invention claimed.

Claims
  • 1. A card-feeding device for a card-handling device, comprising: a card infeed area having a card support surface for supporting a single stack of cards;a card-removing system for removing cards individually from the bottom of the stack;a pivoting arm configured and positioned to press against an uppermost card in a stack of cards disposed in the card infeed area, the pivoting arm having a pivot point that is positioned vertically below an upper edge of the card infeed area; andat least one sensor for detecting at least one of a position of the arm within the shuffling device and a presence of a card in the card infeed area.
  • 2. The card-feeding device of claim 1, further comprising a motor operatively coupled to the pivoting arm for rotating the pivoting arm such that an end of the pivoting arm opposite the pivot point stays in contact with the uppermost card in the stack as cards are removed from the card infeed area.
  • 3. The card-feeding device of claim 2, wherein rotation of the arm by the motor positions the pivoting arm to apply pressure against the card at the top of the stack.
  • 4. The card-feeding device of claim 2, wherein the at least one sensor indicates the position or degree of rotation of the pivoting arm.
  • 5. The card-feeding device of claim 2, wherein a processor is in communication with the at least one sensor.
  • 6. The card-feeding device of claim 2, wherein the motor is a stepper motor.
  • 7. The card-feeding device of claim 6, wherein the motor is configured to rotate in only one direction.
  • 8. The card-feeding device of claim 1, wherein the pivoting arm is positionable in a card engaged position and a retracted position.
  • 9. The card-feeding device of claim 1, wherein a processor is in communication with the at least one sensor.
  • 10. The card-feeding device of claim 9, wherein the processor is in communication with the at least one sensor, and wherein the processor is programmed to actuate the motor to alter the position of the pivoting arm.
  • 11. The card-feeding device of claim 1, wherein the pivoting arm is configured to be positioned in a retracted position wherein the pivoting arm is removed from the card infeed area.
  • 12. A method of shuffling cards comprising: providing cards to be shuffled into a single card infeed area of a card shuffling apparatus, the card infeed area accessible from an upper surface of the card shuffling apparatus as a stack with a top and bottom;removing cards one at a time from the bottom of the stack and moving the removed cards to a shuffling zone;shuffling the cards; andstabilizing the stack of cards with a motor rotating a portion of a pivoting arm into contact with a portion of the stack of cards, the pivoting aim having a pivot point that is positioned vertically below an uppermost edge of the card infeed area, and subsequently removing the arm from the portion of the stack of cards with the motor.
  • 13. The method of claim 12, further comprising moving the pivoting arm in response to a signal from a sensor.
  • 14. The method of claim 13, further comprising detecting the presence or absence of playing cards in the card infeed area with the sensor.
  • 15. The method of claim 13, further comprising detecting at least one of a degree of rotation of the pivoting arm and pressure by the pivoting arm against playing cards in the infeed area with the sensor.
  • 16. The method of claim 12, further comprising moving the pivoting arm in response to a user input.
  • 17. The method of claim 12, further comprising contacting the top of the stack of cards with a wheel carried by the arm.
  • 18. A card feed system, comprising: a card infeed area with a card support surface, the card infeed area accessible from an upper surface of the card feed system;a card removal system capable of removing cards individually from a bottom of a stack of cards; anda rotating pivot arm configured, in a first engaged position, to apply a downward force to a stack of cards in the card infeed area and, in a second recessed position, to be removed from the card infeed area, the pivoting arm having a pivot point that is positioned vertically below an upper edge of the card infeed area.
  • 19. The card feed system of claim 18, and further comprising a card-shuffling system.
CROSS REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS

This application is a continuation of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/444,167 filed May 31, 2006, now U.S. Pat. No. 8,353,513, issued Jan. 15, 2013.

US Referenced Citations (261)
Number Name Date Kind
793489 Williams Jun 1905 A
1014219 Hall Jan 1912 A
1885276 McKay Nov 1932 A
2001220 Smith May 1935 A
2001918 Nevius May 1935 A
2016030 Woodruff et al. Oct 1935 A
2043343 Warner Jun 1936 A
2065824 Plass Dec 1936 A
2254484 Hutchins Sep 1941 A
2328153 Laing Aug 1943 A
2328879 Isaacson Sep 1943 A
2364413 Wittel Dec 1944 A
2778644 Stephenson Jan 1957 A
2937739 Levy May 1960 A
2950005 MacDonald Aug 1960 A
3147978 Sjostrand Sep 1964 A
3235741 Plaisance Feb 1966 A
3312473 Friedman et al. Apr 1967 A
3530968 Palmer Sep 1970 A
3595388 Castaldi Jul 1971 A
3690670 Cassady et al. Sep 1972 A
3716238 Porter Feb 1973 A
3897954 Erickson Aug 1975 A
3944230 Fineman Mar 1976 A
4159581 Lichtenberg Jul 1979 A
4232861 Maul Nov 1980 A
4310160 Willette et al. Jan 1982 A
4361393 Noto Nov 1982 A
4368972 Naramore Jan 1983 A
4385827 Naramore May 1983 A
4388994 Suda et al. Jun 1983 A
4397469 Carter Aug 1983 A
4494197 Troy et al. Jan 1985 A
4497488 Plevyak et al. Feb 1985 A
4512580 Matviak Apr 1985 A
4513969 Samsel Apr 1985 A
4515367 Howard May 1985 A
4534562 Cuff et al. Aug 1985 A
4566782 Britt et al. Jan 1986 A
4586712 Lorber et al. May 1986 A
4659082 Greenberg Apr 1987 A
4662637 Pfeiffer et al. May 1987 A
4667959 Pfeiffer et al. May 1987 A
4741524 Bromage May 1988 A
4750743 Nicoletti Jun 1988 A
4755941 Bacchi Jul 1988 A
4759448 Kawabata Jul 1988 A
4770421 Hoffman Sep 1988 A
4807884 Breeding Feb 1989 A
4822050 Normand et al. Apr 1989 A
4832342 Plevyak et al. May 1989 A
4876000 Mikhail et al. Oct 1989 A
4900009 Kitahara et al. Feb 1990 A
4926327 Sidley May 1990 A
4951950 Normand et al. Aug 1990 A
4969648 Hollinger et al. Nov 1990 A
4995615 Cheng et al. Feb 1991 A
5000453 Stevens et al. Mar 1991 A
5067713 Soules et al. Nov 1991 A
5081487 Hoyer et al. Jan 1992 A
5121192 Kazui Jun 1992 A
5121921 Friedman Jun 1992 A
5179517 Sarbin et al. Jan 1993 A
5199710 Lamle Apr 1993 A
5209476 Eiba et al. May 1993 A
5224712 Laughlin et al. Jul 1993 A
5240140 Huen Aug 1993 A
5257179 DeMar et al. Oct 1993 A
5261667 Breeding Nov 1993 A
5275411 Breeding Jan 1994 A
5276312 McCarthy et al. Jan 1994 A
5283422 Storch et al. Feb 1994 A
5288081 Breeding et al. Feb 1994 A
5299089 Lwee Mar 1994 A
5303921 Breeding Apr 1994 A
5356145 Verschoor Oct 1994 A
5362053 Miller et al. Nov 1994 A
5374061 Albrecht et al. Dec 1994 A
5382024 Blaha Jan 1995 A
5382025 Sklansky et al. Jan 1995 A
5390910 Mandel Feb 1995 A
5431399 Kelley et al. Jul 1995 A
5437462 Breeding et al. Aug 1995 A
5445377 Steinbach Aug 1995 A
5470079 LeStrange et al. Nov 1995 A
5584483 Sines et al. Dec 1996 A
5586766 Forte et al. Dec 1996 A
5586936 Bennett et al. Dec 1996 A
5605334 McCrea et al. Feb 1997 A
5613912 Slater et al. Mar 1997 A
5651548 French et al. Jul 1997 A
5655961 Acres et al. Aug 1997 A
5669816 Garczynski et al. Sep 1997 A
5676372 Sines et al. Oct 1997 A
5681039 Miller et al. Oct 1997 A
5683085 Johnson et al. Nov 1997 A
5690324 Otomo et al. Nov 1997 A
5692748 Frisco et al. Dec 1997 A
5695189 Breeding et al. Dec 1997 A
5707287 McCrea et al. Jan 1998 A
5718427 Cranford et al. Feb 1998 A
5722893 Hill et al. Mar 1998 A
5735525 McCrea et al. Apr 1998 A
5735742 French et al. Apr 1998 A
5772505 Garczynski et al. Jun 1998 A
5779546 Meissner et al. Jul 1998 A
5781647 Fishbine et al. Jul 1998 A
5788574 Ornstein et al. Aug 1998 A
5803808 Strisower Sep 1998 A
5836775 Hiyama et al. Nov 1998 A
5911626 McCrea et al. Jun 1999 A
5919090 Mothwurf Jul 1999 A
5936222 Korsunsky et al. Aug 1999 A
5941769 Order et al. Aug 1999 A
5944310 Johnson et al. Aug 1999 A
D414527 Tedham Sep 1999 S
5989122 Roblejo et al. Nov 1999 A
6015311 Benjamin et al. Jan 2000 A
6019368 Sines et al. Feb 2000 A
6039650 Hill et al. Mar 2000 A
6068258 Breeding et al. May 2000 A
6071190 Weiss et al. Jun 2000 A
6093103 McCrea et al. Jul 2000 A
6117012 McCrea et al. Sep 2000 A
6126166 Lorson et al. Oct 2000 A
6127447 Mitry et al. Oct 2000 A
6139014 Breeding et al. Oct 2000 A
6149154 Grauzer et al. Nov 2000 A
6165069 Sines et al. Dec 2000 A
6165072 Davis et al. Dec 2000 A
6213310 Wennersten et al. Apr 2001 B1
6217447 Lofink et al. Apr 2001 B1
6250632 Albrecht Jun 2001 B1
6254096 Grauzer et al. Jul 2001 B1
6254484 McCrea, Jr. Jul 2001 B1
6267248 Johnson et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267648 Katayama et al. Jul 2001 B1
6267671 Hogan Jul 2001 B1
6270404 Sines et al. Aug 2001 B2
6293864 Romero Sep 2001 B1
6299167 Sines et al. Oct 2001 B1
6299536 Hill Oct 2001 B1
6313871 Schubert Nov 2001 B1
6325373 Breeding et al. Dec 2001 B1
6346044 McCrea, Jr. Feb 2002 B1
6361044 Block et al. Mar 2002 B1
6403908 Stardust et al. Jun 2002 B2
6443839 Stockdale et al. Sep 2002 B2
6446864 Kim et al. Sep 2002 B1
6460848 Soltys et al. Oct 2002 B1
6517435 Soltys et al. Feb 2003 B2
6517436 Soltys et al. Feb 2003 B2
6520857 Soltys et al. Feb 2003 B2
6527271 Soltys et al. Mar 2003 B2
6530836 Soltys et al. Mar 2003 B2
6530837 Soltys et al. Mar 2003 B2
6532297 Lindquist Mar 2003 B1
6533276 Soltys et al. Mar 2003 B2
6533662 Soltys et al. Mar 2003 B2
6568678 Breeding et al. May 2003 B2
6579180 Soltys et al. Jun 2003 B2
6579181 Soltys et al. Jun 2003 B2
6582301 Hill Jun 2003 B2
6582302 Romero Jun 2003 B2
6585586 Romero Jul 2003 B1
6585856 Zwick et al. Jul 2003 B2
6588750 Grauzer et al. Jul 2003 B1
6588751 Grauzer et al. Jul 2003 B1
6595857 Soltys et al. Jul 2003 B2
6616535 Nishizaki et al. Sep 2003 B1
6622185 Johnson Sep 2003 B1
6629889 Mothwurf Oct 2003 B2
6629894 Purton Oct 2003 B1
6637622 Robinson Oct 2003 B1
6638161 Soltys et al. Oct 2003 B2
6645068 Kelly et al. Nov 2003 B1
6645077 Rowe Nov 2003 B2
6651981 Grauzer et al. Nov 2003 B2
6651982 Grauzer et al. Nov 2003 B2
6652379 Soltys et al. Nov 2003 B2
6655684 Grauzer et al. Dec 2003 B2
6659460 Blaha et al. Dec 2003 B2
6663490 Soltys et al. Dec 2003 B2
6666768 Akers Dec 2003 B1
6676127 Johnson et al. Jan 2004 B2
6676517 Beavers Jan 2004 B2
6680843 Farrow et al. Jan 2004 B2
6685567 Cockerille et al. Feb 2004 B2
6685568 Soltys et al. Feb 2004 B2
6688979 Soltys et al. Feb 2004 B2
6698756 Baker et al. Mar 2004 B1
6712696 Soltys et al. Mar 2004 B2
6719634 Mishina et al. Apr 2004 B2
6726205 Purton Apr 2004 B1
6732067 Powderly May 2004 B1
6746333 Onda et al. Jun 2004 B1
6758751 Soltys et al. Jul 2004 B2
6758757 Luciano, Jr. et al. Jul 2004 B2
6804763 Stockdale et al. Oct 2004 B1
6848844 McCue, Jr. et al. Feb 2005 B2
6886829 Hessing et al. May 2005 B2
6889979 Blaha May 2005 B2
6957746 Martin et al. Oct 2005 B2
6959925 Baker et al. Nov 2005 B1
6959935 Buhl et al. Nov 2005 B2
6964612 Soltys et al. Nov 2005 B2
7011309 Soltys et al. Mar 2006 B2
7029009 Grauzer et al. Apr 2006 B2
7036818 Grauzer et al. May 2006 B2
7059602 Grauzer et al. Jun 2006 B2
7066464 Blad et al. Jun 2006 B2
7073791 Grauzer et al. Jul 2006 B2
7139108 Andersen et al. Nov 2006 B2
7213812 Schubert et al. May 2007 B2
7237969 Bartman Jul 2007 B2
7255344 Grauzer et al. Aug 2007 B2
7322576 Grauzer et al. Jan 2008 B2
7338044 Grauzer et al. Mar 2008 B2
7367561 Blaha et al. May 2008 B2
7384044 Grauzer et al. Jun 2008 B2
7413191 Grauzer et al. Aug 2008 B2
7448626 Fleckenstein Nov 2008 B2
7510186 Fleckenstein Mar 2009 B2
7523935 Grauzer et al. Apr 2009 B2
7661676 Smith et al. Feb 2010 B2
7766332 Grauzer et al. Aug 2010 B2
8353513 Swanson Jan 2013 B2
20010036231 Easwar et al. Nov 2001 A1
20010036866 Stockdale et al. Nov 2001 A1
20020107067 McGlone et al. Aug 2002 A1
20020187830 Stockdale et al. Dec 2002 A1
20030052450 Grauzer et al. Mar 2003 A1
20030064798 Grauzer et al. Apr 2003 A1
20030087694 Storch May 2003 A1
20030090059 Grauzer et al. May 2003 A1
20030094756 Grauzer et al. May 2003 A1
20030195025 Hill Oct 2003 A1
20040067789 Grauzer et al. Apr 2004 A1
20040116179 Nicely et al. Jun 2004 A1
20040224777 Smith et al. Nov 2004 A1
20050035548 Yoseloff et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050037843 Wells et al. Feb 2005 A1
20050104290 Grauzer et al. May 2005 A1
20050137005 Soltys et al. Jun 2005 A1
20050146093 Grauzer et al. Jul 2005 A1
20050206077 Grauzer et al. Sep 2005 A1
20050242500 Downs Nov 2005 A1
20060033269 Grauzer et al. Feb 2006 A1
20060046853 Black Mar 2006 A1
20060181022 Grauzer et al. Aug 2006 A1
20060279040 Downs et al. Dec 2006 A1
20070006708 Laakso Jan 2007 A1
20070102879 Stasson May 2007 A1
20070278739 Swanson Dec 2007 A1
20080006997 Scheper et al. Jan 2008 A1
20080113700 Czyzewski et al. May 2008 A1
20080303210 Grauzer et al. Dec 2008 A1
20090191933 French Jul 2009 A1
20100244382 Snow Sep 2010 A1
20100276880 Grauzer et al. Nov 2010 A1
20110109042 Rynda et al. May 2011 A1
Foreign Referenced Citations (3)
Number Date Country
8700764 Feb 1987 WO
9840136 Sep 1998 WO
0051076 Aug 2000 WO
Non-Patent Literature Citations (9)
Entry
Scarne's Encyclopedia of Games by John Scarne, 1973, “Super Contract Bridge”, p. 153.
Service Manual/User Manual for Single Deck Shufflers: BG1, BG2 and BG3 by Shuffle Master, 1997.
Specification of Australian Patent Application No. 31577/95, filed Jan. 17, 1995, Applicants: Rodney G. Johnson et al., Title: Card Handling Apparatus.
Specification of Australian Patent Application No. Not Listed, filed Aug. 15, 1994, Applicants: Rodney G. Johnson et al., Title: Card Handling Apparatus.
PCT International Search Report and Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for PCT/US2008/007069, dated Sep. 8, 2008, 10 pages.
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US07/15035, dated Sep. 29, 2008, 3 pages.
PCT International Search Report for PCT/US07/15036, dated Sep. 23, 2008, 3 pages.
Press Release for Alliance Gaming Corp., Jul. 26, 2004—Alliance Gaming Announces Control with Galaxy Macau for New Mind Play Baccarat Table Technology, http://biz.yahoo.com/prnews.
Tracking the Tables, by Jack Bularsky, Casino Journal, May 2004, vol. 17, No. 5, pp. 44-47.
Related Publications (1)
Number Date Country
20130134674 A1 May 2013 US
Continuations (1)
Number Date Country
Parent 11444167 May 2006 US
Child 13741236 US