This invention relates to credit cards and other types of cards typically stored in a wallet or a carrying case. More particularly, this invention relates to increasing ability of a user to grip such a card, especially when the card includes a magnetic stripe or other means of storing encoded information.
Cards of various kinds have become ubiquitous in modern society people often carry a number of cards in their wallet or carrying case, including credit cards, ATM or bank cards, debit cards, “smart” cards, insurance cards, a driver's license, identification cards, telephone calling cards, transit cards, library cards, and card-entry hotel keys. An increasing number of consumer transactions require the use of these cards, for example as the form of payment or as identification necessary for another form of payment or admission. Quick and accurate access to individual cards is useful and desirable for both the consumer and the vendor of goods or services.
For the consumer, typically, credit cards and other types of cards are placed in a wallet or carrying case. To perform their function properly, card wallets and carrying cases are frequently equipped with sleeves or slots for holding one or more cards in an arrangement selected by the user. In order to hold cards snugly, these sleeves are often designed to provide very little space for the card. Moreover, with a limited number of separate storage sleeves in their wallet or carrying case, many people find it necessary to store two, three or more cards in a single sleeve.
The result is that the cards are often held tightly within each sleeve, and several factors may contribute to making it difficult to remove a particular desired card from the sleeve. For example, if a consumer needs to remove a card sandwiched between two other cards in a single sleeve, there may be little surface with which to grip an individual card. In addition, the surface of many cards, such as credit cards and ATM cards, is smooth, making it difficult to grip. Consumers with large fingers, or elderly consumers or others with reduced dexterity, may thus encounter special difficulties in extricating a particular card from a wallet or carrying case. Difficulty in removing a single selected card increases the time necessary for the transaction, causes stored cards to be frequently reshuffled and potentially disorganized, and increases the likelihood that cards will be dropped or lost.
Vendors also have an interest in the ease of card removal. For a vendor, an important object of a transaction is to receive the correct card from the consumer, collect the necessary information—for example by reading the encoded information on the card's magnetic stripe—and return the card promptly. A consumer's difficulty in removing a card from a wallet or carrying case may increase transaction time, which may lead in turn to longer lines and increased waiting time for other consumers, or the need for additional personnel to serve customers in a prompt manner.
Finally, card issuers such as banks and credit card companies have an interest in a card that can be selected accurately by the consumer and read accurately by electronic readers. A card issuer typically, earns revenue when a consumer uses the issuer's card. If a card cannot be properly retrieved, the consumer may choose to use a different card, thus depriving the transaction to the issuer of the card initially sought by the consumer.
The need for quick and accurate access to a card is not diminished by the presence of a magnetic stripe on the card. Typically, such magnetic stripes are placed on the back side of the card, and usually contain encoded information that electronic readers can read to perform a function or confirm identification. For example, on credit and debit cards, the magnetic stripe on the back of the card is usually encoded with specific account information such as the credit card number, the cardholder's name, the card expiration date, and a personal identification code. Interference with the operation of the magnetic stripe could render the stripe useless or could otherwise cause the card to fail.
Proper functioning of the magnetic stripe is very important. If the electronic device for reading the encoded information cannot operate properly, the vendor must enter the information manually, using a keypad, telephone or other similar device. Manually entering the encoded information adds both indirect and direct costs to the vendor. For example, the additional time necessary to enter the information manually may increase needs for register operators and decrease the vendor's ability to attend to other customer service matters. In addition, vendors are frequently charged increased transaction fees by the card issuer for a manually entered transaction.
In order to ensure interoperability between the magnetic stripe readers and cards bearing magnetic stripes, the parameters defining the magnetic stripe are governed by the International Organization for Standardization (ISO) and the International Electrotechnical Commission (IEC). The ISO/IEC 7811 provides standards for the physical characteristics of the magnetic stripe including the location of the stripe on the card, the surface profile of the stripe, and the height of the stripe above the card surface.
While less common today than magnetic stripe cards, smart cards are also gaining popularity with consumers. Smart cards contain an embedded computer chip containing digitally encoded information. The proper functioning of the embedded computer chip, like the proper functioning of the magnetic stripe, is essential for commercial transactions.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,096,228 issued to Rinderknecht, entitled “Notched I.D. Card,” suggests an early approach for improving the ability of a user to grip a card. Rinderknecht teaches the use of substantial notch or hole in the card. This solution, however, has a number of short-comings. Most importantly, a notch in the card as disclosed in Rinderknecht can interfere with the proper functioning of the magnetic stripe typically found on credit cards and other cards in use today and with the proper functioning of the computer chip in smart cards.
An object of the invention is to improve the ability of a user to grip—that is, to improve gripability—of credit-card-sized cards often stored in a wallet or carrying case. A further object of the invention is to increase the gripability of credit-card-sized cards that include a magnetic stripe or other means for encoding information without interfering with the intended operability of the magnetic stripe or other means of encoding information.
Another object of the invention is to use either raised or indented dimples, or a combination of raised and indented dimples, on the front side, on the back side, or both sides of the card, to increase the gripability of the card.
The present invention, as broadly described herein, provides a credit-card-sized card with a front, a back, edges, and a means for improving the gripability of the card. In one embodiment the means for improving gripability comprises dimples arranged in a variety of locations along the top of the front side of the card. In another embodiment, the dimples are arranged near the top of the front side of the card and also on the sides of the front of the card. In yet another embodiment, dimples are arranged on the front side of the card near all four edges. In each of these preferred embodiments, the numerous dimples may be grouped in close proximity, and arranged into treads or otherwise arranged to improve the gripability of the card.
Additional objects and advantages of the invention are set forth in part in the description which follows, and in part are obvious from the description, or may be learned by practice of the invention.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute part of the specification, illustrate preferred embodiments of the invention, and together with the description, serve to explain the principles of the invention.
Reference will now be made in detail to the present preferred embodiments of the invention, examples of which are illustrated in the accompanying drawings, wherein like reference numerals indicate like elements throughout the several views.
Because the cards 12 may be packed tightly, it is often difficult to remove a specific card. Typically, it is necessary for the user to wedge her forefinger behind the card 12 while applying pressure with her thumb 14 to the front of the card 12. This wedging may cause unnecessary bending of the card which can interfere with the operation of the card 12 in a reader or other device. If the card 12 has a smooth plastic surface, for example, or if the user is wearing gloves or if her hands are slippery as other examples, withdrawing the card 12 from the wallet 10 may be even more difficult.
In the preferred embodiment depicted in
In a preferred embodiment depicted in
In a preferred embodiment depicted in
As depicted in
Similarly, the height of dimples 17 should not exceed the height of any other embossed or raised characters or icons on the face of the card 32, so that the dimples 17 do not interfere with devices designed to imprint the raised characters or icons on receipts or other paper or similar documents. Depending on the intended or expected use of the credit-card-sized card of the present invention, the height of any dimples or other means for improving the gripability above the surface of the card should be apparent to one of skill in the art, from this description or from practice of the invention so that such dimples do not interfere with readers, imprinters or other devices designed to be used with the card.
It will be apparent to those skilled in the art that various modifications may be made to this invention and that other embodiments of the invention may be made based on this disclosure. To the extent that such other embodiments are created, it is intended that they shall fall within the protection provided by the appended claims and their equivalents.
This application is a continuation-in-part of U.S. patent application Ser. No. 09/095,752, filed Dec. 30, 1997 now abandoned, the entirety of which is incorporated herein by reference.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3230650 | Orkin | Jan 1966 | A |
4079883 | Calder | Mar 1978 | A |
4338805 | Nygren | Jul 1982 | A |
4443027 | McNeely et al. | Apr 1984 | A |
4628195 | Baus | Dec 1986 | A |
4856310 | Parienti | Aug 1989 | A |
4914281 | Benton et al. | Apr 1990 | A |
4950279 | Chang | Aug 1990 | A |
5061845 | Pinnavaia | Oct 1991 | A |
5096228 | Rinderknecht | Mar 1992 | A |
5250341 | Kobayashi et al. | Oct 1993 | A |
5556092 | Theken | Sep 1996 | A |
5700037 | Keller | Dec 1997 | A |
5844230 | Lalonde | Dec 1998 | A |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
WO9311510 | Jun 1993 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 09095752 | Dec 1997 | US |
Child | 09611320 | US |