The present disclosure relates to an airship. More particularly, the disclosure relates to cargo airship and associated features.
Aerostatic lighter-than-air airships have seen substantial use since 1783 following the first successful manned flight of the Montgolfier brothers' hot air balloon. Numerous improvements have been made since that time, but the design and concept of manned hot air balloons remains substantially similar. Such designs may include a gondola for carrying a pilot and passengers, a heating device (e.g., a propane torch), and a large envelope or bag affixed to the gondola and configured to be filled with air. The pilot may then utilize the heating device to heat the air until the buoyant forces of the heated air exert sufficient force on the envelope to lift the balloon and an attached gondola. Navigation of such an airship has proven to be difficult, mainly due to wind currents and lack of propulsion units for directing the balloon.
To improve on the concept of lighter-than-air flight, some lighter-than-air airships have evolved to include propulsion units, navigational instruments, and flight controls. Such additions may enable a pilot of such an airship to direct the thrust of the propulsion units in such a direction as to cause the airship to proceed as desired. Airships utilizing propulsion units and navigational instruments typically do not use hot air as a lifting gas (although hot air may be used), with many pilots instead preferring lighter-than-air lifting gases such as hydrogen and helium. These airships may also include an envelope for retaining the lighter-than-air gas, a crew area, and a cargo area, among other things. The airships are typically streamlined in a blimp- or zeppelin-like shape, which, while providing reduced drag, may subject the airship to adverse aeronautic effects (e.g., weather cocking, a.k.a. wind cocking).
Airships other than traditional hot air balloons may be divided into several classes of construction: rigid, semi-rigid, non-rigid, and hybrid type. Rigid airships typically possess rigid frames containing multiple, non-pressurized gas cells or balloons to provide lift. Such airships generally do not depend on internal pressure of the gas cells to maintain the shape of the airships. Semi-rigid airships generally utilize some pressure within a gas envelope to maintain the shape of the airships, but may also have frames along a lower portion of the envelope for purposes of distributing suspension loads into the envelope and for allowing lower envelope pressures, among other things. Non-rigid airships typically utilize a pressure level in excess of the surrounding air pressure in order to retain their shape, and any load associated with cargo carrying devices is supported by the gas envelope and associated fabric. The commonly used blimp is an example of a non-rigid airship.
Hybrid airships may incorporate elements from other airship types, such as a frame for supporting loads and an envelope utilizing pressure associated with a lifting gas to maintain its shape. Hybrid airships also may combine characteristics of heavier-than-air airship (e.g., airplanes and helicopters) and lighter-than-air technology to generate additional lift and stability. It should be noted that many airships, when fully loaded with cargo and fuel, may be heavier than air and thus may use their propulsion system and shape to generate aerodynamic lift necessary to stay aloft. However, in the case of a hybrid airship, the weight of the airship and cargo may be substantially compensated for by lift generated by forces associated with a lifting gas such as, for example, helium. These forces may be exerted on the envelope, while supplementary lift may result from aerodynamic lift forces associated with the hull.
A lift force (i.e., buoyancy) associated with a lighter-than-air gas may depend on numerous factors, including ambient pressure and temperature, among other things. For example, at sea level, approximately one cubic meter of helium may balance a mass of approximately one kilogram. Therefore, an airship may include a correspondingly large envelope with which to maintain sufficient lifting gas to lift the mass of the airship. Airships configured for lifting heavy cargo may utilize an envelope sized as desired for the load to be lifted.
Landing and securing a lighter-than-air airship may also present unique problems based on susceptibility to adverse aerodynamic forces. Although many lighter-than-air airships may perform “vertical takeoff and landing” (VTOL) maneuvers, once such an airship reaches a point near the ground, a final landing phase may entail ready access to a ground crew (e.g., several people), environment monitoring systems, and/or a docking apparatus for tying or otherwise securing the airship to the ground. Without access to such elements, the airship may be carried away by wind currents or other uncontrollable forces while a pilot of the airship attempts to exit and handle the final landing phase. Therefore, systems and methods enabling landing and securing of an airship by one or more pilots may be desirable.
Due to the various features of airships, such as adaptability in takeoff/landing abilities, lifting capacity, and maneuverability, there are many potential uses of airships. For example, airships may be particularly suitable for transporting cargo. Other options for transporting cargo, especially heavy cargo, have limitations. In particular, airplanes, and vehicles, and ships may require certain infrastructures and/or environmental conditions (e.g., runways, roads, waterways, etc.), while airships, with VTOL and hovering capabilities, have greater flexibility to receive, transport, and deliver cargo to a variety of different locations. Thus, an airship that is adapted for a variety of transport functions is desirable.
Further, in order to accommodate these and other potential uses of airships, it is necessary to incorporate various controls that allow the airship to perform certain operations, such as a hover operation. In one example, an airship may approach a landing area, hover near the landing area, perform an operation (e.g., exchange cargo), and depart from the hovering position. It may be difficult, however, for a pilot to consistently and easily maintain the airship in a particular hovering position, because the aerodynamic forces on a hovering airship may widely vary depending on the conditions at the time. Factors such as wind speed, wind direction, wind frequency, turbulence conditions, airship weigh and balance, airship heading etc., and the consideration of these factors may cause operation of the airship to be complicated during hovering (as well as approach and departure). Thus, systems and methods for improved flight planning and easing control of an airship, and particularly an airship during a hovering maneuver, are desirable.
The present disclosure is directed to addressing one or more of the desires discussed above utilizing various exemplary embodiments of an airship.
In one aspect, an airship is disclosed. The airship may include a hull configured to contain a gas and at least one propulsion assembly coupled to the airship and including a propulsion device. The airship may also include a payload bay comprising an external cargo area located outside of the hull. The airship may further include a cargo handling system comprising at least one hoisting mechanism configured to lift cargo into the external cargo area while the airship is hovering.
In another aspect, an airship is disclosed. The airship may include a gondola forming at least a portion of a keel and including a cockpit. The airship may further include a cargo bay comprising an external cargo area formed by the keel. The airship may also include at least one hoisting mechanism configured to lift cargo into the external cargo area from the ground while the airship is hovering, and a tunnel that runs longitudinally along the payload bay, the at least one hoisting mechanism configured to move longitudinally in the tunnel to thereby move cargo longitudinally along the keel. The airship may further include a locking mechanism configured to secure the cargo to the keel and a control station located in the cockpit and configured to allow a passenger to control the cargo handling system.
In another aspect, a flight control system for an airship including a hull configured to contain a gas, and a propulsion assembly is disclosed. The flight control system may include memory storing instructions and one or more processors configured to execute the instructions to estimate environmental factors associated with a cargo transfer location during a future time period associated with a flight mission. The one or more processors may be further configured to determine an effect of the estimated environmental factors on aerostatic lift and airship stability, determine a route map for the flight mission based at least on the effect of the estimated environmental factors and an anticipated cargo transfer mode, and display the route map on a display associated with the airship.
In another aspect an airship is disclosed that may include a hull. The hull may include a rigid frame, an outer envelope surrounding the rigid frame, and a plurality of cells attached to the rigid frame and configured to contain a gas. The airship may further include a fin assembly attached to the hull, a gondola attached to the hull, and a landing gear assembly. The hull may include an elongated lenticular shape in which a height of the hull is less than half of a width of the hull and less than one third of the length of the hull, and the width of the hull is approximately one half of the length of the hull.
In yet another aspect, an airship is disclosed that may include a hull including a convex lower portion and a convex upper portion. The hull may include a rigid frame, an outer envelope surrounding the rigid frame, and a plurality of cells attached to the rigid frame and configured to contain a gas. The airship may further include a propulsion system including a plurality of propulsion assemblies, a fin assembly attached to the hull including a plurality of stabilizing fins, and a gondola attached to the hull. In addition, the plurality of propulsion assemblies may be secured to the lower portion of the hull, including at least two propulsions assemblies secured on a port side of the hull and at least two propulsion assemblies secured on a starboard side of the hull. Further, the stabilizing fins may be arranged in an X-configuration.
In yet another aspect, a method of delivering cargo to a remote location with an airship is disclosed. The method may include securing at least one shipping container to an external cargo area of the airship, the shipping container containing cargo. The method may further include traveling to the remote location. The method may also include delivering the shipping container, including lowering the shipping container to the ground with a hoisting mechanism.
It is to be understood that both the foregoing general description and the following detailed description are exemplary and explanatory only and are not restrictive of the disclosed embodiments, as claimed.
The accompanying drawings, which are incorporated in and constitute a part of this specification, illustrate disclosed embodiments and, together with the description, serve to explain the disclosed embodiments. In the drawings:
Reference will now be made in detail to the drawings. Wherever convenient, the same reference numbers will be used throughout the drawings to refer to the same or like parts.
The accompanying figures depict exemplary embodiments of a cargo airship. The cargo airship includes features that enable a variety of cargo transport operations. For example, the cargo airship may include features that provide tailored flight planning capabilities that consider various aspects of a future cargo transport operation, such as environmental factors that may affect the operation. Further, the cargo airship may include certain features that allow for the safe and efficient execution of the cargo transport operation. For example, the cargo airship may include cargo handling systems that are adapted for transporting heavy cargo and quickly exchanging the cargo once the airship has arrived at a delivery location. Further, the cargo airship may include an optimized shape designed for the particular requirements of receiving, transporting, and delivering cargo.
Also, it should be evident that transportation of cargo is only one exemplary application of the disclosed airship, and that the features and configurations of the airship described herein are useful for many different airship uses and functions. For example, an airship consistent with the disclosed embodiments may be configured to act as a mobile medical facility configured to provide medical services to remote locations.
Throughout this discussion of various embodiments, the terms “front” and/or “fore” will be used to refer to areas within a section of airship 10 closest to forward travel, and the term “rear” and/or “aft” will be used to refer to areas within a section of airship 10 closest to the opposite direction of travel. Moreover, the term “tail” will be used to refer to a rear-most point associated with hull 12, while the term “nose” will be used to refer to the forward-most point within the front section of hull 12.
Hull
Hull 12 may include a support structure 26 (see
In an exemplary embodiment, frame members 28 may include a plurality of structural rings 30 interconnected by a plurality of longerons 32, and at least one structural beam 34. In one embodiment, the plurality of structural rings 30 may include approximately 11-12 vertically-mounted ring-shaped truss structures evenly spaced along hull 12. The plurality of longerons 32 may include a plurality of primary longerons that run horizontally from the nose of airship 10 to the tail. The plurality of longerons 32 may also include a plurality of intermediate longerons interconnected between and shorter than the primary longerons. Structural beam 34 may be a longitudinal truss member, larger than longerons 32, running fore and aft through the air ship, providing extra rigidity and distributing loads (e.g., gas cell lift loads, cargo loads, etc.) evenly throughout support structure 26.
To maximize a lifting capacity associated with airship 10, it may be desirable to design and fabricate support structure 26 such that a weight associated with support structure 26 is minimized while strength, and therefore resistance to aerodynamic forces, for example, is maximized. In other words, maximizing a strength-to-weight ratio associated with support structure 26 may provide a more desirable configuration for airship 10. For example, one or more frame members 28 may be constructed from light-weight, but high-strength, materials including, for example, aluminum, composite materials, and/or carbon fiber, among other things. In one embodiment, structural rings 30, the primary longerons of longerons 32 and structural beam(s) 34 are fabricated from aluminum, while the intermediate longerons of longerons 32 are fabricated from composite materials.
Hull 12 may be configured to retain a volume of lighter-than-air gas. As shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, each gas cell 38 may be an individual cylindrical segment, shaped to fit its location within hull 12. The use of separately positioned gas cells 38 for containing the gas may help minimize sloshing of the gas during flight and helps avoid collection of too much gas in the nose or tail areas (e.g., during pitch up and pitch down maneuvers). Gas cells 38 may be positioned between adjacent structural rings 30. In an exemplary embodiment, securing members 40 may be secured to attachment points 36 around structural rings 30 (see
In an exemplary embodiment, securing members 40 may be netting, cables, ropes, or the like. For example, securing members 40 may be high-strength netting material secured to attachment points 36. As airship 10 travels between different altitudes, a pressure inside each gas cell 38 may change, causing gas cells 38 to increase and decrease in size. Securing members 40 may maintain each gas cell 38 in its own segment of hull 12 (e.g., between adjacent structural rings 30), while not constraining expansion/contraction caused by changes in pressure.
As shown in
In an exemplary embodiment, hull 12 may configured such that airship 10 includes a “near equilibrium” design in which airship 10 relies primarily on static lift of the gas retaining in gas cells 38 and not on any dynamic lift that may be generated by hull 12 during flight. In an exemplary embodiment, hull 12 may include a hull fineness ratio of approximately 3 to 1.
Fin Assembly
Returning to
Propulsion System
Propulsion system 16 may include a plurality of propulsion assemblies 46 positioned around a perimeter of hull 12. As shown in
Propulsion assemblies 46 may be configured to provide a propulsive force (e.g., thrust), directed in a particular direction (i.e., a thrust vector), and configured to generate motion (e.g., horizontal and/or vertical motion), counteract a motive force (e.g., wind forces), and/or other manipulations and maneuvers of airship 10 (e.g., yaw control). For example, propulsion assemblies 46 may enable yaw, pitch, and roll control as well as providing thrust for horizontal and vertical motion.
As shown in
As shown in
Propulsion assembly 46 may be adjustable such that an intensity and vector direction of propulsion device 50 may be modified. For example, pylon 54 may be adjustable (e.g., rotatable) to adjust a direction of thrust produced by propulsion device 50. For instance, each of pylons 54 may be individually and/or collectively adjustable to adjust a thrust angle of propulsion device(s) 50 to move airship 10 in three dimensions between, for example, a vertical plane for producing horizontal thrust and a horizontal plane for producing vertical thrust. In addition (or alternatively), where propulsion device 50 is configured as an adjustable airfoil (e.g., variable-pitch propellers), the angle of attack of propulsion device 50 may be adjusted to accomplish a complete thrust reversal. Propulsion device 50 may also be configured with, for example, vanes, ports, and/or other devices, such that a thrust generated by propulsion device 50 may be modified and directed in a desired direction.
Landing Gear Assembly
As shown in
In some embodiments, landing gear assembly 18 may be configured for use in mooring a grounded airship 10. For example, landing gear assembly 18 may be of sufficient strength to allow a mooring mechanism (e.g., a wire) to be secured between landing gear assembly 18 and the ground, helping to maintain airship 10 in one location and overcoming forces (e.g., wind forces) that may tend to force airship 10 away from its moored location.
In some embodiments, landing gear assembly 18 may include features the help facilitate cargo exchange. For example, landing gear assembly 18 may be configured to change in length with respect to hull 12 (e.g., retract into hull 12, telescope into itself, etc.) such that gondola 20 may be lowered toward the ground, assisting with a cargo delivery/pickup/exchange process. In another example, wheels 60 may be configured to allow rolling movement in any direction, such as to allow a position of airship 10 to be adjusted on the ground in any direction, assisting with cargo exchange and or mooring of airship 10.
Gondola
In one embodiment, one or more support beams may span at least a portion of airship 10, such as a distance from a perimeter of hull 14 to gondola 20. The support beams may provide additional strength and rigidity to hull 12, as well as permit a load capacity that provides for a wide variety of uses for airship 10, including the safe transportation of heavy cargo. It should be understood, however, that gondola 20 may be connected to and supported by hull 12 in other manners.
Gondola 20 may include a portion that may serve as a keel to which various cargo 70 may be attached. For example, gondola 20 may include a flat horizontal wall 72 separating external cargo area 66 from internal cargo area 68. Horizontal wall 72 may serve as a ceiling of external cargo area 66 and a floor of internal cargo area 68. An opening 74 in horizontal wall 72 may connect external cargo area 66 with internal cargo area 68. Cargo 70 may be lifted through opening 74 and secured to horizontal wall 72 (or elsewhere in internal cargo area 68). A door (not shown) may close opening 74. Cargo handling system 22 (
Cargo handling control station 78 may include controls that allow an operator to control at least one aspect of cargo handling system 22. For example, cargo handling control station 78 may include controls that allow an operator to perform one or more cargo handling operations, such as lowering a crane towards the ground, lifting the crane towards cargo bay 64, opening and/or closing one or more cargo locks to secure cargo 70 to horizontal wall 72, and the like. In one embodiment, cockpit 62 may include at least one seat 80 for an operator (e.g., a co-pilot) which may swivel between flight control station 76 and cargo handling control station 78. In this way, an operator may assist with a flying operation at one time, and then easily switch to control a cargo handling operation. For example, a co-pilot may assist a pilot with reaching a destination, and then, once the destination is reached, perform a cargo handling operation (e.g., exchange of cargo), such as while the pilot maintains the airship in a hover above a delivery location.
Cargo Handling System
In an exemplary embodiment, hoists 88 may be configured to be secured to various types of cargo 70. For example, hoists 88 may be configured to be attached to standard-size shipping containers (e.g., 20-foot or 40-foot shipping containers). In addition, hoists 88 may be configured to be attached to other cargo, such as bags for liquid (e.g., fuel, etc.) and loose solids (gravel, ore, etc.). In some embodiments, hoists 88 may be configured to accommodate cargo nets, allowing many other forms of cargo (e.g., odd-shaped individual items, boxes, barrels, pallets, etc.).
As shown in
As shown in
In some embodiments, at least one hoist 88 of hoisting mechanism 82 may be configured to lift other cargo 70 through opening 74 in horizontal wall 72, and place cargo 70 at a desired location inside internal cargo area 68 (e.g., on horizontal wall 72, suspended from support structure 26, etc.).
Flight Control System
Whether configured for manned, un-manned, and/or automated flight, airship 10 may, according to some embodiments, be controlled by a computer 200. For example, stabilizing fins 44 and propulsion assemblies 46, among other things, may be controlled by a computer 200.
In this exemplary embodiment, disk 210, input device 215, MFD 220, optional external device 225, and interface 230 are connected to processor 205 via I/O unit 255. Further, disk 210 may contain a portion of information that may be processed by processor 205 and displayed on MFD 220. Input device 215 includes the mechanism by which a user and/or system associated with airship 10 may access computer 200. Optional external device 225 may allow computer 200 to manipulate other devices via control signals. For example, a fly-by-wire or fly-by-light system may be included allowing control signals to be sent to optional external devices, including, for example, servo motors associated with propulsion unit mounts 52 and stabilizing fins 44. “Control signals,” as used herein, may mean any analog, digital, and/or signals in other formats configured to cause operation of an element related to control of airship 10 (e.g., a signal configured to cause operation of one or more control surfaces associated with airship 10). “Fly-by-wire,” as used herein, means a control system wherein control signals may be passed in electronic form over an electrically conductive material (e.g., copper wire). Such a system may include a computer 200 between the operator controls and the final control actuator or surface, which may modify the inputs of the operator in accordance with predefined software programs. “Fly-by-light,” as used herein, means a control system where control signals are transmitted similarly to fly-by-wire (i.e., including a computer 200), but wherein the control signals may transmitted via light over a light conducting material (e.g., fiber optics).
According to some embodiments, interface 230 may allow computer 200 to send and/or receive information other than by input device 215. For example, computer 200 may receive signals indicative of control information from flight controls 220, a remote control, and/or any other suitable device. Computer 200 may then process such commands and transmit appropriate control signals accordingly to various systems associated with airship 10 (e.g., fin assembly 14, propulsion system 16, etc.). Computer 200 may also receive weather and/or ambient condition information from sensors associated with airship 10 (e.g., altimeters, navigation radios, pitot tubes, etc.) and utilize such information for generating control signals associated with operating airship 10 (e.g., signals related to trim, yaw, and/or other adjustments).
In an exemplary embodiment, computer 200 may receive pilot control signals from flight control station 76, interpret the control signals, and produce a control signal to cause one or more features of airship 10 to respond in a manner intended by the pilot. In this way, a pilot may perform flight operations associated with airship 10. For example, a pilot may fly airship from one location to another to deliver, pickup, and/or exchange cargo 70.
For example, it may be desirable for computer 200 to transmit in-flight signals configured to, for example, correct course heading and/or assist in stabilizing airship 10 independent of an operator of airship 10. For example, computer 200 may calculate, based on inputs from various sensors (e.g., altimeter, pitot tubes, anemometers, etc.), a wind speed and direction associated with ambient conditions surrounding airship 10. Based on such information, computer 200 may determine a set of operational parameters that may maintain stability of airship 10. In an exemplary embodiment, computer 200 may provide automated control that includes surge and heave control for maintaining the airship in the hovering state.
In an exemplary embodiment, flight control system 24 may further include various features that allow for the planning of a future flight operation. For example, computer 200 may be configured to estimate environmental factors associated with a cargo transfer location during a future time period associated with a flight mission. Computer 200 may be configured determine an effect of these estimated environmental factors on flight parameters of airship 10. For example, computer 200 may be configured to estimate an effect on aerostatic lift and airship stability.
In some embodiments, computer 200 may be configured to determine a route map for the flight mission, such as a flight mission for delivering and/or picking up cargo 70. Computer 200 may consider any determined effect of estimated environmental factors when determining the route map, including determining a particular time frame that may be best suited for the flight mission. Further, an anticipated cargo transfer mode, such as whether the flight mission will include a landed exchange or a hovering exchange, may be considered by computer 200 when determining a route map with time frame. Computer 200 may be configured to display a determined route map on a display associated with airship 10.
In some embodiments, airship 10 may be configured to consider environmental factors at a destination location (e.g., a delivery site) when determining a route map for a flight mission. In order to consider the environmental factors, flight control system 24 may include at least one weather detection device configured to transmit environmental condition data to computer 200. In one embodiment, the weather detection device may be permanently installed at a particular destination location (e.g., a delivery site at which regular deliveries are made). In another embodiment, the weather detection device may be portable and may be configured to be transported by the airship. In this way, one or more weather detection devices may be sent to a delivery site ahead of a planned flight mission and set-up for detection of environmental factors. Computer 200 may use the detected environmental factors in planning a route map, and may be used by the pilot in executing a flight mission. After a delivery is completed, the one or more weather detection devices may be secured as cargo to airship 10 and transported back their previous location.
Mooring/Tethering System
When airships, such as airship 10, are on the ground, it may be difficult to maintain a stationary location. The lifting force provided by the gas in gas cells 38 and wind forces exerted on hull 12 may tend to move airship 10 as it sits on the ground. In order to help keep airship 10 in one location, a mooring system 270 may be used.
In one embodiment, each of the three legs 56 of landing gear assembly 18 may include a securing winch. A securing cable 274 may run from the each winch to a mooring pad 272. Mooring pads 272 may include steel rings to which securing cables 274 may be attached. A crew member, such as the pilot, may operate the winches to tighten securing cables 274. In an exemplary embodiment, mooring pads 272 may be arranged such that, when securing cables 274 are tightened, legs 56 are located directly over a mooring pad 272, thereby holding airship 10 tightly in place.
In another embodiment, mooring system 270 may include a mechanism by which front landing gear leg 56 of landing gear assembly 18 may be moored to a hard point (e.g., on a flying field). The front landing gear leg 56 would thereby serve as the point about which airship 10 would move horizontally during wind directional changes.
There are other situations and configurations by which airship 10 may be moored to ground G. For example, when cargo transfers are conducted while hovering in strong wind conditions, it may be necessary to provide some assistance in maintaining airship 10 in a relatively stationary location.
As wind gusts increase and decrease, airship 10 may experience a “blow down” effect by which the airship 10 is forced downward in altitude. But because tether cable 280 may be secured to a loading portion of airship 10 (e.g., landing gear assembly 18), tether cable 280 may act as a stabilizing restraint against any pitching motion caused by wind gusts. For example, tether cable 280 acts as a general damper against movement in three dimensions. The dampening provides additional time for the pilot to control propulsion system 16 to counter the influences of the wind.
The airship of the present disclosure may be adapted for use in any of a variety of operations while providing various advantages over other options. In one aspect, an airship of the present disclosure may be adapted for the transport of cargo, especially heavy cargo to be delivered to or picked up from a location that would otherwise be difficult to reach. Examples of such remote locations may include a tundra region, an arctic region, or a desert region.
In one example, an airship consistent with disclosed embodiments may be useful in reaching remote mining locations, pipelines in the arctic, impoverished areas in need of food and water, and other areas that are not otherwise easily accessed via ground vehicle or airplane and/or could not easily receive shipments of heavy cargo.
In another example, an airship of the present disclosure may be used to provide a large facility on-demand, wherever and whenever needed. For instance, an airship may be equipped as a mobile medical facility that may travel to an area of need (e.g., a location of a disease outbreak) and be large enough to provide shelter and services to many people, obviating the need to build a stationary facility.
Airship 10 of the present disclosure includes various features that enable safe and efficient delivery, pickup, and/or exchange of cargo 70. For example, the size and weight capacity of airship 10 allows for one-stop delivery and/or pickup of numerous and/or heavy cargo. Further, the specially-designed and tested shape of hull 12, the arrangement of fin assembly 14, and the configuration of propulsion system 10 allows airship 10, despite its size, to easily perform a variety of flight operations and maneuvers, including a hover operation in which airship 10 is controlled to remain in a relatively steady three-dimensional location while a cargo transfer takes place below.
Further, the arrangement and configuration of gondola 20 and cargo handling system 22 allow for a quick and efficient cargo transfer, such as during a hover operation. For example, cockpit 62, equipped with easily-accessed cargo handling control station 78, may allow a crew member (e.g., a co-pilot) to quickly switch from a flight operation to a cargo handling operation, simply by looking out a window facing cargo bay 64. The crew member may operate controls to manipulate one or more features of cargo handling operation, working with other crew members (e.g., crew on the ground) to perform a cargo transfer.
Further, the availability of external cargo area 66 allows for quick lowering and/or lifting of cargo 70 to execute a transfer. In addition, external cargo area 66 allows for transport of standardized cargo, such as 20- or 40-foot shipping containers that are normally transported on ships or land-based vehicles. In one embodiment, external cargo area 66 may be sized to accommodate three 20-foot shipping containers. In another embodiment, airship 10 may be sized and arranged such that external cargo area 66 may accommodate six 40-foot shipping containers.
An exemplary cargo transport operation will now be described. Airship 10 may be moored overnight at an origination location. On-board sensors may communicate with computer 200 to monitor essential airship systems. For example, computer 200 may monitor gas pressure and purity in gas cells 38, superheat percentage of gas, overall heaviness and/or lightness of airship 10, temperature of power sources 48, fuel tanks, and fuel lines. Flight control system 24 may include monitoring systems configured to send messages to “on call” personnel to inform them of any issues that may occur while airship 10 is moored.
At the beginning of a flight operation, flight control system 24 may communicate with on-board instrumentation to determine a static heaviness (or lightness) of airship 10. This information may be important for maintaining a predetermined heaviness that allows for efficient and safe flight of airship 10. Crew of airship 10 may use an airship environmental planning tool to further prepare for the flight. For example, the crew may review a route map generated by flight control system 24, including a predictive assessment of conditions at a destination site (e.g., based on weather detection devices that are located at the destination site). The route map may provide an optimum heading, speed, and altitude that will minimize an impact of local weather on each leg of an airship flight operation.
In addition, planning for the flight operation may include analysis of cargo to be delivered and/or picked up at the destination site 300. In particular, because airship 10 may need to be loaded to a certain level to allow for safe flight, ballast determinations may be made to determine what will make up for absence of cargo (e.g., prior to pick-up or after delivery). Ballast may include concrete blocks, for example, that are secured in cargo bay 64 (e.g., held in external cargo area 66). Alternatively, ballast may be attached to an external hook installed on cockpit 62 nearest forward landing gear of landing gear assembly 18. This arrangement would leave cargo bay 64 and hoisting mechanism 82 open and available for attaching any cargo 70 for delivery.
If there is cargo 70 for delivery, a member of the crew may operate cargo handling system 22 to secure cargo 70 in cargo bay 64. For example, an operator may lower one or more hoists 88 of hoisting mechanism 82 to the ground to allow an attachment member 90 to be secured to cargo 70. Thereafter, hoist 88 may be lifted with cargo 70, placing it in a desired location within cargo bay 64. For example, cargo 70 may be lifted up into external cargo area 66, contacting horizontal wall 72. An operator may remotely control locking mechanism 94 to secure cargo 70 to horizontal wall 72.
After various flight checks are made, the flight crew (e.g., pilot and co-pilot) may prepare for and execute a takeoff operation. The takeoff operation may be a vertical takeoff or a running takeoff, depending on the parameters of airship 10 at the time and the available infrastructure at the origination site (e.g., presence of a runway). The flight crew may control propulsion system 16 to modify a thrust vector associated with propulsion assemblies 46, thereby causing airship 10 to fly away from the origination site on the planned route.
As airship 10 approaches destination site 300, the crew may prepare for a cargo transfer operation. As described herein, the cargo transfer operation may be a hovering load exchange or a landed load exchange. In some embodiments, flight control system 24 may continuously receive environmental condition data and provide the information to the flight crew for consideration during flight and approach to destination site 300. In addition, the computer 200 may consider a heaviness of airship 10 and determine whether ballast or trim adjustments are necessary. The flight crew and flight control system 24 may work together to bring airship 10 to a location above destination site 300, such as a location approximately equal to the length L of airship 10 above destination site 300.
From this position, a crew member sits in seat 80 and turns to face cargo bay 64. This crew member may operate cargo handling control station 78 to assist with the cargo transfer. Meanwhile, another crew member may operate flight control station 76 to maintain airship 10 within an acceptable degree of deviation from the location above destination site 300.
The crew member may operate cargo handling control station 78 to manipulate cargo handling system 22 to perform a cargo transfer. In one example, a first hoist 88 may be connected to cargo to be lowered to the ground (“delivery cargo”) and a second hoist 88 may be unattached to any cargo. The second hoist 88 may be lowered to the ground and connected to cargo or ballast being picked-up (“return cargo”). The crew member operating cargo handling system 22 may begin to lower the delivery cargo to the ground. Once connected, the hoist tension of the second hoist 88 is increased on the return cargo to approximately 50% of the weight of the delivery cargo. The tension on the return cargo is increased while the tension on the delivery cargo is slackened to 50% weight. The operating crew member then quickly increases tension on the return cargo to 100% and reduces tension on the delivery cargo to 0%. The return cargo is the hoisted up toward airship 10, and the attachment member 90 is detached from the delivery cargo and the first hoist 88 is pulled back up to airship 10. The process may be repeated until all the cargo transfer is complete.
If a landed load exchange is to be conducted, the flight crew may work in conjunction with flight control system 24 to and airship 10 at destination site 300. For example, computer 200 may receive environmental condition data from a weather detection device, such as temperature, precipitation, wind speed, direction, and gust information, etc. Computer 200 may use this information to assist with a landing of airship 10. After airship 10 lands, a crew member may operate cargo handling system 22 to exchange delivery cargo (or ballast) with return cargo (or ballast) in a manner similar to that described above. Airship 10 may subsequently takeoff and travel to the next destination location.
Although, for purposes of this disclosure, certain disclosed features are shown in some figures but not in others, it is contemplated that, to the extent possible, the various features disclosed herein may be implemented by each of the disclosed, exemplary embodiments. Accordingly, differing features disclosed herein are not to be interpreted as being mutually exclusive to different embodiments unless explicitly specified herein or such mutual exclusivity is readily understood, by one of ordinary skill in the art, to be inherent in view of the nature of the given features.
While the presently disclosed device and method have been described with reference to the specific embodiments thereof, it should be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes may be made and equivalents may be substituted without departing from the scope of the disclosure. In addition, many modifications may be made to adapt a particular situation, material, composition of matter, process, process step, or steps to the objective, spirit, and scope of the present invention. Other embodiments of the invention will be apparent to those skilled in the art from consideration of the specification and practice of the invention disclosed herein. It is intended that the specification and examples be considered as exemplary only.
This application claims priority under 35 U.S.C. §119 to U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/899,574, filed Nov. 4, 2013, U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/988,584, filed May 5, 2014, and U.S. Provisional Application No. 62/055,978, filed Sep. 26, 2014, each of which is hereby incorporated by reference in its entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1027590 | Bucher | May 1912 | A |
1261005 | Barstow et al. | Apr 1918 | A |
1350211 | Corson, Jr. | Aug 1920 | A |
1944467 | Sabin | Jan 1934 | A |
2286014 | Rowe | Jun 1942 | A |
2379355 | Hodgdon | Jun 1945 | A |
2935275 | Grayson | May 1960 | A |
3337845 | Hart | Aug 1967 | A |
3395877 | McFadden et al. | Aug 1968 | A |
3432120 | Guerrero | Mar 1969 | A |
D213731 | Hsi | Apr 1969 | S |
3477168 | Trodglen, Jr. | Nov 1969 | A |
3529283 | Emerson | Sep 1970 | A |
3580636 | Setto | May 1971 | A |
RE28454 | Fitzpatrick et al. | Jun 1975 | E |
3946364 | Codomo et al. | Mar 1976 | A |
3970270 | Pittet, Jr. | Jul 1976 | A |
3971533 | Slater | Jul 1976 | A |
3976265 | Doolittle | Aug 1976 | A |
4085912 | Slater | Apr 1978 | A |
4269375 | Hickey | May 1981 | A |
4298175 | Earl | Nov 1981 | A |
4326681 | Eshoo | Apr 1982 | A |
4461436 | Messina | Jul 1984 | A |
D274999 | Reeves | Aug 1984 | S |
D280194 | Bothe | Aug 1985 | S |
4583094 | Mosier | Apr 1986 | A |
4685640 | Warrington et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
D305418 | Blake | Jan 1990 | S |
4901948 | Panos | Feb 1990 | A |
D307131 | Kramer | Apr 1990 | S |
4914976 | Wyllie | Apr 1990 | A |
4915792 | Zeilon | Apr 1990 | A |
D307884 | Ninkovich | May 1990 | S |
D309887 | Ninkovich | Aug 1990 | S |
5026003 | Smith | Jun 1991 | A |
5096141 | Schley | Mar 1992 | A |
5170963 | Beck, Jr. | Dec 1992 | A |
5240206 | Omiya | Aug 1993 | A |
5281960 | Dwyer, III | Jan 1994 | A |
5348251 | Ferguson | Sep 1994 | A |
5351911 | Neumayr | Oct 1994 | A |
5368256 | Kalisz et al. | Nov 1994 | A |
5516060 | McDonnell | May 1996 | A |
5614897 | Durnford | Mar 1997 | A |
5675327 | Coirier et al. | Oct 1997 | A |
5755402 | Henry | May 1998 | A |
5823468 | Bothe | Oct 1998 | A |
5906335 | Thompson | May 1999 | A |
D418804 | Glasgow et al. | Jan 2000 | S |
6010093 | Paulson | Jan 2000 | A |
6019312 | Blenn | Feb 2000 | A |
D424508 | Hankinson et al. | May 2000 | S |
6156102 | Conrad et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6164589 | Kalisz | Dec 2000 | A |
6196498 | Eichstedt et al. | Mar 2001 | B1 |
6230503 | Spletzer | May 2001 | B1 |
6231007 | Schäfer | May 2001 | B1 |
6286783 | Keunkler | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6293493 | Eichstedt et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6302357 | Kalisz | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6302944 | Hoenig | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6311925 | Rist | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6315242 | Eichstedt et al. | Nov 2001 | B1 |
6328257 | Schäfer | Dec 2001 | B1 |
6336957 | Tsymerman | Jan 2002 | B1 |
6360549 | Spletzer et al. | Mar 2002 | B1 |
6383727 | Twist et al. | May 2002 | B1 |
6393719 | Stipp | May 2002 | B1 |
6427943 | Yokomaku et al. | Aug 2002 | B2 |
6453684 | Spletzer et al. | Sep 2002 | B1 |
6499309 | Yeh | Dec 2002 | B1 |
6511525 | Spletzer et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6549179 | Youngquist et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6565037 | Tonkovich | May 2003 | B1 |
6574979 | Faqih | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6577929 | Johnson et al. | Jun 2003 | B2 |
6644060 | Dagon | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6648272 | Kothmann | Nov 2003 | B1 |
6659838 | Anderson | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6670304 | Chang | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6702229 | Anderson et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6868690 | Faqih | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6880783 | Munk | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6885313 | Selk et al. | Apr 2005 | B2 |
6892118 | Feyereisen | May 2005 | B1 |
6910339 | Laine et al. | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6955715 | Tittle | Oct 2005 | B1 |
6960243 | Smith et al. | Nov 2005 | B1 |
6966523 | Colting | Nov 2005 | B2 |
7000410 | Hutchinson | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7040572 | Munk | May 2006 | B2 |
7043934 | Radermacher et al. | May 2006 | B2 |
7055777 | Colting | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7108228 | Marshall | Sep 2006 | B1 |
7137592 | Barocela et al. | Nov 2006 | B2 |
7156342 | Heaven, Jr. et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7159817 | VanderMey et al. | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7216069 | Hett | May 2007 | B2 |
7251945 | Tongue | Aug 2007 | B2 |
7306654 | King et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7384454 | Tongue | Jun 2008 | B2 |
D577100 | Brown et al. | Sep 2008 | S |
D583294 | Balaskovic | Dec 2008 | S |
7478535 | Turner, Jr. | Jan 2009 | B2 |
7601208 | Tongue | Oct 2009 | B2 |
7722706 | Thielow | May 2010 | B2 |
7759275 | Birbara et al. | Jul 2010 | B2 |
7760438 | Suiter | Jul 2010 | B1 |
7825830 | Joyner | Nov 2010 | B2 |
7866601 | Balaskovic | Jan 2011 | B2 |
8152092 | Zulkowski et al. | Apr 2012 | B2 |
9139283 | Campbell | Sep 2015 | B1 |
20020003189 | Kuenkler | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020109045 | Beach et al. | Aug 2002 | A1 |
20030001044 | Munk | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030023355 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2003 | A1 |
20030127557 | Anderson et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030234320 | Colting | Dec 2003 | A1 |
20040162000 | Anderson | Aug 2004 | A1 |
20050277359 | Anderson | Dec 2005 | A1 |
20060000945 | Voss | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060016930 | Pak | Jan 2006 | A1 |
20060060695 | Walden et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060065777 | Walden et al. | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060151666 | VanderMey et al. | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20060227013 | Harvison et al. | Oct 2006 | A1 |
20060261213 | Lavan | Nov 2006 | A1 |
20060284002 | Stephens et al. | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070295859 | Colvin | Dec 2007 | A1 |
20080035787 | Thompson | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080179454 | Balaskovic | Jul 2008 | A1 |
20090109064 | Joyner | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090200416 | Lee | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20090272841 | Sinsabaugh et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
20090321557 | Colting | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100067118 | Takahashi et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100076628 | Boorman et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
20100102164 | Brutoco | Apr 2010 | A1 |
20100140391 | Wu | Jun 2010 | A1 |
20110051041 | Yashiro | Mar 2011 | A1 |
20110163200 | Balaskovic | Jul 2011 | A1 |
20120018571 | Goelet | Jan 2012 | A1 |
20120212228 | Cho et al. | Aug 2012 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1054124 | May 1979 | CA |
210003 | May 1909 | DE |
2348085 | Apr 1975 | DE |
2640433 | Apr 1977 | DE |
3508101 | Sep 1986 | DE |
4218239 | Dec 1993 | DE |
197 44 581 | Apr 1999 | DE |
19811794 | Sep 1999 | DE |
19924464 | Nov 2000 | DE |
10011319 | Sep 2001 | DE |
201 15 193 | Jan 2002 | DE |
20116152 | Feb 2002 | DE |
10058072 | Jun 2002 | DE |
20204023 | Jul 2002 | DE |
10120232 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10121854 | Nov 2002 | DE |
10139877 | Feb 2003 | DE |
10148589 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10148590 | Apr 2003 | DE |
10201133 | Jul 2003 | DE |
10210541 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10210542 | Sep 2003 | DE |
10216480 | Oct 2003 | DE |
10226868 | Dec 2003 | DE |
10228048 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10252895 | May 2004 | DE |
10252896 | May 2004 | DE |
10252908 | May 2004 | DE |
10252909 | May 2004 | DE |
10252910 | May 2004 | DE |
10252911 | May 2004 | DE |
10 2005 01352 | Jun 2007 | DE |
0095763 | Dec 1983 | EP |
0 282 425 | Sep 1988 | EP |
0 291 355 | Nov 1988 | EP |
0 325 452 | Jul 1989 | EP |
0 503 801 | Sep 1992 | EP |
0 619 792 | Oct 1994 | EP |
0 714 362 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0 729 423 | Sep 1996 | EP |
0 745 045 | Dec 1996 | EP |
1 070 008 | Jan 2001 | EP |
1 160 156 | Dec 2001 | EP |
1 292 474 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 294 608 | Mar 2003 | EP |
1 451 063 | Sep 2004 | EP |
1 529 726 | May 2005 | EP |
1 770 009 | Apr 2007 | EP |
2630397 | Oct 1989 | FR |
2 813 663 | Mar 2002 | FR |
2 815 336 | Apr 2002 | FR |
2830838 | Apr 2003 | FR |
2 853 895 | Oct 2004 | FR |
2 896 495 | Jul 2007 | FR |
1 577 488 | Oct 1980 | GB |
2 055 728 | Mar 1981 | GB |
2 197 276 | May 1988 | GB |
2 250 007 | May 1992 | GB |
2 275 036 | Aug 1994 | GB |
2 278 815 | Dec 1994 | GB |
2 300 010 | Oct 1996 | GB |
2359534 | Aug 2001 | GB |
2 366 274 | Mar 2002 | GB |
2 447 411 | Sep 2008 | GB |
52145999 | Dec 1977 | JP |
37568 | Oct 1993 | RU |
2009073 | Mar 1994 | RU |
40822 | Jan 1995 | RU |
2028249 | Feb 1995 | RU |
2070136 | Dec 1996 | RU |
2092381 | Oct 1997 | RU |
2098318 | Dec 1997 | RU |
2111146 D1 | May 1998 | RU |
2111147 | May 1998 | RU |
2114027 | Jun 1998 | RU |
2141911 | Nov 1999 | RU |
2196703 | Jan 2003 | RU |
2249536 | Apr 2005 | RU |
2250122 | Apr 2005 | RU |
1799335 | Feb 1993 | SU |
10870 | Dec 1996 | UA |
32397 | Dec 2000 | UA |
55928 | Apr 2003 | UA |
WO 9206002 | Apr 1992 | WO |
WO 9313979 | Jul 1993 | WO |
WO 9324364 | Dec 1993 | WO |
WO 9505307 | Feb 1995 | WO |
WO 9514607 | Jun 1995 | WO |
WO 9522486 | Aug 1995 | WO |
WO 9527652 | Oct 1995 | WO |
WO 9532893 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9532894 | Dec 1995 | WO |
WO 9620897 | Jul 1996 | WO |
WO 9638340 | Dec 1996 | WO |
WO 9715492 | May 1997 | WO |
WO 9749606 | Dec 1997 | WO |
WO 9828188 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9829303 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9831589 | Jul 1998 | WO |
WO 9858217 | Dec 1998 | WO |
WO 9967131 | Dec 1999 | WO |
WO 0048902 | Aug 2000 | WO |
WO 0073142 | Dec 2000 | WO |
WO 0136885 | May 2001 | WO |
WO 0142082 | Jun 2001 | WO |
WO 0168447 | Sep 2001 | WO |
WO 0194172 | Dec 2001 | WO |
WO 03021291 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03024791 | Mar 2003 | WO |
WO 03047967 | Jun 2003 | WO |
WO 03055745 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03055746 | Jul 2003 | WO |
WO 03074356 | Sep 2003 | WO |
WO 03097450 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 03097451 | Nov 2003 | WO |
WO 2004000642 | Dec 2003 | WO |
WO 2004074091 | Sep 2004 | WO |
WO 2004087499 | Oct 2004 | WO |
WO 2005002960 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2005007508 | Jan 2005 | WO |
WO 2006061617 | Jun 2006 | WO |
WO 2006085919 | Aug 2006 | WO |
WO 2006137880 | Dec 2006 | WO |
WO 2007036038 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007037932 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007045091 | Apr 2007 | WO |
WO 2007065649 | Jun 2007 | WO |
Entry |
---|
English translation of German patent DE 42 18 239 C2. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion for Int'l Appln. No. PCT/US2001/044102, dated Feb. 16, 2012 (18 pages). |
21st Century Airships Web Site, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.21stcenturyairships.com (5 pages). |
ALA-40 proof-of-concept—Thermoplane, Photos from “Janes—All the World's Aircraft,” 1997 (2 pages). |
Ben Ionnatta, “Spy Blimps and Heavy Lifters: The Latest Thing in Airships,” Air & Space Smithsonian, Sep. 2007 (2 pages). |
Blimp Europa N2A Web Site, accessed Oct. 11, 2006, machine translated Jun. 25, 2007, http://www.blimp-n2a.com/cl5alpha.htm (3 pages). |
CargoLifter Web Site, accessed Jun. 19, 2007, http://cargolifter.info (2 pages). |
Daniel P. Raymer, “Aircraft Design: A Conceptual Approach,” 4th Ed., 2006, pp. 652-59, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, Inc., Reston, Virginia (11 pages). |
Demonstrator Alpha, Lenticular Aircraft of Air Photography, accessed Oct. 11, 2006, machine translated Jun. 25, 2007, http://perso.orange.fr/balaskovic/actu-texte.html (2 pages). |
Dynalifter Web Site, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.dynalifter.com (7 pages). |
“Lift Equations,” derived from “The Non-Rigid Airship Test and Evaluation Manual,” U.S. Navy, 1940 (2 pages). |
Michael A. Dornheim, “Skunks Working,” Aviation Week, Feb. 6, 2006, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.aviationweek.com/aw/generic/story—generic.jsp?channel=awst&id=news/020606p2.xml (2 pages). |
Gabriel A. Khoury and J. David Gillett, “Lenticular Mathematics,” an excerpt from “Airship Technology,” Cambridge University Press, 1999 (6 pages). |
Lord Ventry and Eugene Kolesnik, Excerpt from “Jane's Pocket Book of Airships,” Collier Books, 1977, pp. 94-96 (6 pages). |
Edwin Mowforth, “Lenticular History,” an excerpt from “An Introduction to the Airship,” Second Edition, 2001, and information sheet (7 pages). |
Operation-LTA Web Site, accessed Oct. 11, 2006, http://web.archive.org/web/20040405173243/www.operation-lta.com (5 pages). |
Stephane Doncieux and Jean-Arcady Meyer, “Evolving Neural Networks for the Control of a Lenticular Blimp,” AnimatLab—LIP6, 2003, France, http://animatlab.lip6.fr (12 pages). |
Thomas F. Norton, “Now There's a ‘Personal Blimp:’ Unique Foldable Frame Makes it Practical as a Second Century Aircraft,” General Aviation News, Jan. 19, 2007, p. 18-19, 59th year, No. 2, Flyer Media, Inc., Lakewood, WA (2 pages). |
Worldwide Aeros Corporation Web Site, accessed Jun. 22, 2007, http://www.aerosml.com (4 pages). |
Yu. Boiko and V.A. Turian, “Dreamboat of Centuries,” Moscow, Machine Building, p. 52, Jun. 13, 1991 (3 pages). |
U.S. Army Advanced Materiel Concepts Agency, “Aerial Very Heavy Lift Concepts for the 1990 Army vol. I”, Basic Report, Nov. 1969 (41 pages). |
U.S. Army Advanced Materiel Concepts Agency, “Aerial Very Heavy Lift Concepts for the 1990 Army vol. III,” Academic and Industrial Presentations, Nov. 1, 1969 (200 pages). |
Boeing Vertol Company for NASA Ames., “Feasibility Study of Modern Airships”, Final Report, vol. 1, May 1975 (478 pages). |
P.A. Mackrodt, “Further Studies in the Concept of Delta-Winged Hybrid Airships”, J. Aircraft, Oct. 1, 1980, pp. 734-740 (7 pages). |
Mark D. Ardema, “Missions and Vehicle Concepts for Modern, Propelled, Lighter-Than-Air Vehicles”, AGARD, NATO, Feb. 1985 (50 pages). |
Dr. R.S. Ross et al., “New Air Transport System for Heavy Bulky Cargo” (Advanced Copy), Apr. 20, 1962 (35 pages). |
W.L. Marcy, “Parametric Study of Advanced Fully-Buoyant Naval Air Vehicles”, NADC, Nov. 30, 1976 (86 pages). |
Stepler, Richard M., “Return to Lighter Than Air Transportation for Military and Civilian Application”, Defense Systems Management School, Fort Belvoir, VA, Nov. 1973 (56 pages). |
L. Balis Crema et al., “Some Trends in Airship Technology Developments”, NATO, Apr. 10-15, 1983 (14 pages). |
“Types of Lighter-Than-Air Aircraft,” Author unknown, Publication date unknown (34 pages). |
Mark D. Ardema, “Vehicle Concepts and Technology Requirements for Buoyant Heavy-Lift Systems”, NASA, 1979 (36 pages). |
Mark D. Ardema, “Vehicle Concepts and Technology Requirements for Buoyant Heavy-Lift Systems”, NASA Technical Paper, 1981 (18 pages). |
David Bailey and William Mueller, “North Warning Airship Program, Final Overview,” Naval Air Development Center, Apr. 6, 1987 (211 pages). |
“Preliminary Design Investigation for New Payload and Ground Handling Concepts for Airships Operating in Remote Arctic Regions, Final Report,” Naval Air Development Center, Mar. 31, 1986 (226 pages). |
Capt. J. Arvi et al., “North Warning Program Airship Feasibility Tests, Final Report,” Naval Air Development Center, Feb. 20, 1987 (42 pages). |
Capt. J. Arvi et al., “North Warning System Familiarisation, Feasibility and Operational Demonstration, Final Report,” Naval Air Development Center, Apr. 19, 1986 (133 pages). |
Douglas Botting, “The Giant Airships,” Time-Life Books, Alexandria, VA 1980 (185 pages). |
E. Udartsev and E. Tyan, “Dirigible of a New Generation in Kiev,” available at http://www.aviajournal.com/sections/journal/arh/magazine/200112/index.html, Dec. 2001. (9 pages). |
Edwin Mowforth, “An Introduction to the Airship,” Third Edition, The Airship Association, Sep. 2007 (157 pages). |
Construction Cost Management Co., “With Us, Future Comes Faster,” available at http://www.buildcostcontrol.com/Airship/tabid/640/Default.aspx, 2008 (1 page). |
Future Flight?, Leslie Deane, Ballooning, The Journal of the Balloon Federation of America, Jul./Aug. 2008, pp. 26-32 (7 pages). |
Repoulias et al., “Dynamically Feasible Trajectory and Open-Loop Control Design for Unmanned Airships,” 2007 Mediterranean Conference on Control and Automation, Jul. 27, 2007, XP002511581, Athens, Greece (6 pages). |
Nagabhushan et al., “Directional control of an advanced airship,” AIAA Lighter-Than-Air Systems Technology Conference, 11th, Clearwater Beach, FL, May 15-18, 1995, Technical Papers (A95-30317 07-01), Washington, DC, American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, May 15, 1995, pp. 107-116 (10 pages). |
PCT report of partial international search regarding PCT/US2007/021962 dated Dec. 2, 2008. |
PCT International Search Report re PCT/US2007/021962, dated Mar. 4, 2009. |
PCT International Search Report re PCT/US2008/009453, dated Apr. 3, 2009. |
http://dynalifter.com/, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (23 pages). |
http://hybridairvehicles.net/index.html, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (16 pages). |
http://www.skylifter.com.au/, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (18 pages). |
International Search Report and the Written Opinion dated Oct. 8, 2012, in counterpart International Application No. PCT/US2012/030562, 24 pages. |
Luffman, “Aeroraft the Alternative Aircraft for Heavy Lift Transport or Crane Use,” American Institute of Aeronautics and Astronautics, AIAA's 3rd Annual Aviation Technology, Integration, and Operations (ATIO) Tech, Nov. 17-19, 2003, Denver, Colorado, AIAA 2003-6754, pp. 1-13 (13 pages). |
European Examination Report from EP Application No. 08 827 387.5-1254, dated Jun. 1, 2010. (4 pages). |
European Examination Report from EP Application No. 07 873 810.1-2422, dated Aug. 16, 2010. (4 pages). |
Office Action dated Sep. 3, 2009, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (16 pages). |
Final Office Action dated Apr. 1, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (13 pages). |
Advisory Action dated Aug. 3, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (3 pages). |
Amendment After Final dated Aug. 17, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (28 pages). |
Notice of Allowance dated Sep. 1, 2010, from U.S. Appl. No. 11/907,883. (4 pages). |
PCT Communication Relating to the Results of the Partial International Search re PCT/US2008/009453, dated Feb. 4, 2009. |
Ahmed Ghanmi and Abderrahmane Sokri, “Airships for military logistics heavy lift: A performance assessment for Northern operation applications,” Defence R&D Canada—CORA, Technical Memorandum, Jan. 2010 (63 pages). |
Edwin Mowforth, “Lenticular History,” an excerpt from “An Introduction to the Airship,” Second Edition, 2001, (6 pages). |
http://www.hybridairvehicles.net/index.html, accessed Dec. 1, 2009 (16 pages). |
International Search Report and Written Opinion dated Jul. 26, 2012 in counterpart international application No. PCT/US2012/023954 (14 pages). |
PCT International Search Report re PCT/US2007/021962, dated Apr. 3, 2009 (21 pages). |
PCT International Search Report re PCT/US2008/009453, dated Apr. 3, 2009 (21 pages). |
Written Opinion of the International Searching Authority for International Application No. PCT/US2014/063675 dated Oct. 12, 2015 (17 pages). |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20150291269 A1 | Oct 2015 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61899574 | Nov 2013 | US | |
61988584 | May 2014 | US | |
62055978 | Sep 2014 | US |