The present invention is directed to a cargo bed structure comprising one or more components constructed of fiber reinforced polymer, particularly cargo bed structures featuring pivoting sidewall and tailboard sections.
Cargo bed structures in trucks and trailers are conventionally constructed primarily of steel or wood. However, structures made of such materials suffer from several disadvantages. For example, although steel has a number of desirable properties such has high strength, it is also quite heavy and costly to ship. Further, steel is susceptible to corrosive attack when exposed to fresh water, salt water, oxygen, and other environmental elements such as acid rain, road salts, and other chemicals. The rusting and corrosion of steel weakens the structures made therefrom and can eventually lead to structural failure. As with steel, wood is also susceptible to various types of environmental attack, particular rot from weather exposure and damage from termites. These environmental attacks can lead to a drastic reduction in structural strength and compromise the integrity of the overall structure.
Due to the vulnerability of both steel and wood to environmental attack, frequent and costly maintenance is required to increase the useable life of structures made from such materials. For example, frequent painting or other surface treatment is typically necessary to provide a temporary barrier against corrosion or rot.
Although the use of steel and wood suffer from the disadvantages outlined above, their use is still prevalent in cargo bed structures primarily due to availability, relatively ease of machining or other processing, and because the properties of such materials are relatively consistent and well-known. However, in light of the shortcomings of these conventional construction materials, there is an art-recognized continuing need for load-bearing cargo bed structures that are lightweight and strong, as well as resistant to corrosion and other environmental attack even without surface treatment.
The present invention provides a cargo bed structure for vehicles that incorporates one or more fiber reinforced polymer components in a manner that reduces the weight of the cargo bed, greatly improves weatherability and durability against environmental attack, but still provides the same level of performance associated with cargo bed structures formed entirely of conventional materials, such as commercially acceptable strength and cargo loading capabilities. The present invention provides cargo bed structures that can be incorporated into trucks or trailers, wherein fiber reinforced polymer components form at least a portion of the load-bearing deck of the cargo bed and/or portions of the bulkhead, sidewalls or tailboard sections. The resulting cargo bed structures are more durable and have longer useable life than conventional structures without the need for costly and frequent surface treatments on all surfaces, while still delivering the loading performance expected in such structures. The reduction in weight provided by cargo bed structures of the invention as compared to known cargo bed assemblies enhances the flexibility of the cargo bed in terms of total load weight that can be carried by the vehicle.
In one aspect, a cargo bed structure is provided that comprises a sub-floor assembly comprising a plurality of cross members in spaced relation and a load-bearing deck overlying the sub-floor assembly. The load-bearing deck comprises a plurality of interlocking fiber reinforced polymer decking planks extending in a direction perpendicular to the cross members. The decking planks comprise a first planar section have a load-bearing surface and an opposing surface and two opposed longitudinally extending edges. At least one support rib projects from the opposing surface of the planar section, the support rib comprising a planar portion adapted for interfacing with the cross members. The decking planks further comprise a first interlocking panel projecting from the opposing surface at one of the two opposed longitudinally extending edges of the planar section, the interlocking panel comprising a longitudinally extending channel and a planar portion adapted for interfacing with the cross members. A second interlocking panel also projects from the opposing surface of the planar section at the location of the other longitudinally extending edge, the second interlocking panel comprising a longitudinally extending protrusion adapted for insertion into the channel of the first interlocking panel such that two adjacent decking planks are interlocked together. The second interlocking panel also includes a planar portion adapted for interfacing with the cross members.
The support ribs of the decking plank can provide a planar portion adapted for interfacing with the cross members of the sub-floor assembly. In one embodiment, the decking plank comprises a plurality of support ribs based apart across the opposing surface of the planar section, such as between about two and about five support ribs per decking plank. In one embodiment, the first and second interlocking panels are substantially L-shaped, with the bottom surface of the L forming the planar portion that is adapted for interfacing with the cross members of the sub-floor assembly. The longitudinally extending channel and protrusion of the interlocking panels of the decking planks can be substantially rectangular in cross-section, although other mating cross-sections can be used without departing from the invention. The interlocking fiber reinforced polymer decking planks can be of single-piece construction.
In certain embodiments, the cargo bed is further defined by an upwardly-extending bulkhead assembly and opposed tailboard, and two opposed upwardly-extending sidewalls, wherein the bulkhead assembly and opposed tailboard are positioned substantially perpendicular to the opposing sidewalls. Each sidewall can comprise at least one fiber reinforced polymer panel, the panel being pivotally mounted to the load-bearing deck such that the panels can be pivoted between a first position extending upwardly and substantially perpendicularly to the load-bearing deck and the second position extending outwardly from the load-bearing deck in substantially the same plane as the load-bearing deck.
In one embodiment, each opposing sidewall comprises two fiber reinforced polymer panels, each panel pivotally mounted to the load-bearing deck. The cargo bed structure may further comprise corner support posts affixed to the load-bearing deck at the corners thereof and a middle support post affixed to the load-bearing deck between the two fiber reinforced polymer panels of each side wall. In this embodiment, the fiber reinforced polymer panels of the sidewalls can comprise a latching mechanism adapted for latching the panels to an adjacent corner support post and an adjacent middle support post while in the first upwardly extending position. In certain embodiments, each sidewall is able to withstand a load of at least 600 pounds at any position thereon while in the lowered second position.
The tailboard can also comprise a fiber reinforced panel pivotally mounted to the load-bearing deck such that the tailboard can be pivoted between and first position and a second position substantially as described above in connection with the sidewalls. The fiber reinforced panel of the tailboard may comprise a latching mechanism adapted for latching to each of the corner support post approximate to the tailboard while the tailboard is in the upwardly extending first position.
The bulkhead assembly can also comprise at least one fiber reinforced panel and the corner posts adjacent to the bulkhead assembly also can be constructed of a fiber reinforced polymer. The bulkhead assembly is optionally affixed to a support beam positioned beneath the bulkhead.
In another aspect of the invention, the cargo bed structure further comprises a longitudinally extending window assembly removably attached to each of the sidewalls and the tailboard. The window assembly comprises a fiber reinforced polymer lower frame member adapted to support at least one removal section of ballistic glass, a section of ballistic glass carried by the lower frame section, and a removable fiber reinforced polymer top frame member overlying the ballistic glass section. The window assembly can comprise a plurality of removable ballistic glass sections in spaced relation carried by the lower frame member, the window assembly further comprising a fiber reinforced polymer column between each ballistic glass section. In use, the top frame member of the window assembly can be removed in order to gain access of the ballistic glass sections, which can then be removed as desired to form open ports within the window assembly. The top frame member can then be repositioned overlying the remaining ballistic glass sections. The lower frame member may comprise a substantially U-shaped channel operatively positioned to carry the removable ballistic glass section and a substantially U-shaped channel positioned to bracket the top of the sidewalls and the tailboard in order to be temporarily affixed thereto. A plurality of retaining pins can be operatively positioned to temporarily affix the window assembly to the top of each of the sidewalls and the tailboard.
In another aspect, the invention provides a cargo truck comprising the above-described cargo bed structure.
Having thus described the invention in general terms, reference will now be made to the accompanying drawings, which are not necessarily drawn to scale, and wherein:
The present inventions now will be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all embodiments of the inventions are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein; rather, these embodiments are provided so that this disclosure will satisfy applicable legal requirements. Like numbers refer to like elements throughout. The singular forms “a,” “an,” and “the” include plural referents unless the context clearly dictates otherwise.
Although some embodiments of the invention described herein are directed to a cargo bed structure of a fixed-bed cargo truck, it will be appreciated that the invention is not so limited. For example, aspects of the cargo bed design of the present invention can also be incorporated into towed trailers or trucks with dumping beds.
Referring to
As also shown in
The load-bearing deck 22 and the underlying sub-floor assembly 24 are shown in greater detail in
The sub-floor assembly 24 is shown in greater detail in
In one embodiment, the decking plank 26 further includes a plurality of support ribs 68 extending from the opposing surface 58 of each plank, the support ribs providing a planar portion adapted for interfacing with the cross members 30 of the sub-floor assembly 24. Exemplary support ribs 68 include T-shaped and L-shaped ribs. The first and second interlocking panels, 60 and 62, can also include a planar portion adapted for interfacing with the cross members 30 that support the decking planks 26.
Referring back to
Referring now to
Referring to
The bulkhead assembly 14 is shown in
Turning to
The ballistic glass utilized in ballistic glass sections 100 described above can be any transparent or translucent bullet-resistant or bullet proof material known in the art, such as bullet-resistant glass, bullet-proof glass, ballistic glass, glass clad laminates, and laminated polycarbonate. The non-ballistic glass sections 104 can be constructed of any translucent or transparent material known in the art as useful in windows applications, such as glass or Plexiglas. Both the ballistic glass and the non-ballistic glass can be replaced with sections or panels of other materials that are not necessarily translucent or transparent, such as sections or panels constructed of metal.
As noted above, one or more of the structural elements of the above-described cargo bed structure 12 is constructed of a fiber reinforced polymer material. For example, certain embodiments of the present invention include decking planks 26, tailboard 20, sidewall sections 50 and 52, and bulkhead panel 88 in the form of a fiber reinforced polymer composite. Further, the forward corner posts 40, 40′ and the lower frame member 98 and top frame member 102 of the window assembly 96 can be constructed of a fiber reinforced polymer material. In this manner, the above described cargo bed structure 12 can be constructed largely of materials that are extremely resistant to corrosion and other environmental attack and much lighter than steel.
Further, despite the reduction in weight and the reduction in steel components, the cargo bed structure 12 of the invention meets desired performance characteristics, such as maximum load. In certain embodiments of the present invention, the cargo bed structure 12 provides decking planks 26 with a load capacity of about 2,500 lbs. to about 10,000 lbs. or more without permanent deformation, and the maximum deflection can be 6 mm at the 2,500 lbs. load level. In one embodiment, the present invention provides a cargo bed structure 12 wherein all sidewall sections 50 and 52 comprise a fiber reinforced polymer panel which can withstand a load of at least 600 lbs. when in the lowered position without permanent deformation (when load pad size is 315 mm by 315 mm and centrally positioned longitudinally and 2 inches from the non-hinged side) and a horizontally applied load of at least about 1,000 lbs. when in the raised (vertical) position without permanent deformation, more typically a load capacity of at least about 2,500 lbs in the raised position. The maximum deflection in the lowered position at a load of 600 lbs. can be 75 mm. The pad size of the horizontal test load applied to the sidewalls in the vertical position is 102 mm by 1220 mm and the load is positioned at floor height and centered longitudinally.
Certain embodiments of the cargo bed structure 12 of the invention will exhibit chemical and UV resistance according to IAW ASTM D543 and IAW ASTM G23/ASTM G1499, respectively. For example, in certain embodiments, composite components of the cargo bed structure 12 can be immersed in various solvents for at least 8 hours without changing weight by more than 10% or losing more than 10% of tensile strength, exemplary solvents including motor oils, unleaded gasoline or other hydrocarbon fuels, brake fluids, ethylene glycol, and 10% methanol. Test conditions for chemical resistance can be 73° F., 28.5 inches Hg, and RH of 50%. UV weathering testing can include exposing the composite components to UV light for 1,000 hours (consisting of cycles of 102 minutes of light exposure followed by 18 minutes of light and water spray) without visible evidence of deterioration, such as warping, cracking, peeling, or delaminating.
The fiber reinforced polymers used in the present invention may vary. The fiber reinforced polymer structures typically comprise a polymeric resin having a reinforcing fiber element embedded therein. Exemplary fiber reinforced panel structures include, but are not limited to, a solid laminate, a pultruded or vacuum-infused sandwich panel (e.g., a panel having upper and lower skins with a core therebetween), or a pultruded panel (e.g., a panel having upper and lower skins with vertical or diagonal webs therebetween). Exemplary core materials include wood, foam, and various types of honeycomb. Exemplary polymer resin materials include thermosetting resins, such as unsaturated polyesters, vinyl esters, polyurethanes, epoxies, phenolics, and mixtures thereof.
The fiber reinforcing element may comprise E-glass fibers, although other reinforcing elements such as S-glass, carbon fibers, KEVLAR®, metal (e.g., metal nano-fibers), high modulus organic fibers (e.g., aromatic polyamides, polybenzamidazoles, and aromatic polyimides), and other organic fibers (e.g., polyethylene and nylon) may be used. Blends and hybrids of such materials may also be used as a reinforcing element. Other suitable composite materials that may be used as the reinforcing element include whiskers and fibers constructed of boron, aluminum silicate, or basalt. Exemplary fiber reinforced panels and methods of making such panels are disclosed in the following U.S. patents: U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,794,402; 6,023,806; 6,044,607; 6,108,998; 6,645,333; and 6,676,785, all of which are incorporated herein in their entirety.
The sidewall sections, bulkhead panel, and tailboard can be constructed as a sandwich panel having a core and two laminated skins secured to opposite sides of the core. An exemplary commercial embodiment of a suitable sandwich panel is the TRANSONITE® composite panels available from Martin Marietta Composites of Raleigh, N.C. In one embodiment, the core of the sandwich panel is formed of a foam material with a plurality of fibers extending through the foam and connecting the two laminated skins secured to each opposing surface of the foam core.
Many modifications and other embodiments of the inventions set forth herein will come to mind to one skilled in the art to which these inventions pertain having the benefit of the teachings presented in the foregoing descriptions and the associated drawings. Therefore, it is to be understood that the inventions are not to be limited to the specific embodiments disclosed and that modifications and other embodiments are intended to be included within the scope of the appended claims. Although specific terms are employed herein, they are used in a generic and descriptive sense only and not for purposes of limitation.
This application is a continuation of U.S. application Ser. No. 11/686,040, filed Mar. 14, 2007, which claims priority to U.S. Appl. Ser. No. 60/782,013, filed on Mar. 14, 2006, all of which are incorporated by reference herein in their entirety.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3986317 | Mountz | Oct 1976 | A |
4003728 | Rath | Jan 1977 | A |
4139115 | Robinson | Feb 1979 | A |
4358233 | Morris et al. | Nov 1982 | A |
4505126 | Jones et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4553403 | Taylor | Nov 1985 | A |
4726196 | Zajic | Feb 1988 | A |
4951992 | Hockney | Aug 1990 | A |
4957521 | Cullen et al. | Sep 1990 | A |
4976490 | Gentle | Dec 1990 | A |
5044689 | Evers | Sep 1991 | A |
5161848 | Lutton | Nov 1992 | A |
5351990 | Thomas | Oct 1994 | A |
5403062 | Sjostedt et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5660427 | Freeman et al. | Aug 1997 | A |
5794402 | Dumlao et al. | Aug 1998 | A |
5807046 | Onken | Sep 1998 | A |
5947812 | Henning et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
5997067 | Shambeau et al. | Dec 1999 | A |
6023806 | Dumlao et al. | Feb 2000 | A |
6044607 | Dumlao et al. | Apr 2000 | A |
6076693 | Reiter et al. | Jun 2000 | A |
6089639 | Wojnowski | Jul 2000 | A |
6108998 | Dumlao | Aug 2000 | A |
6299246 | Tomka | Oct 2001 | B1 |
6364388 | Ziegler et al. | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6422642 | Grimm et al. | Jul 2002 | B1 |
6439649 | Lorenzo et al. | Aug 2002 | B1 |
6467118 | Dumlao et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6505883 | Ehrlich | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6543827 | Miller | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6554342 | Burnett | Apr 2003 | B1 |
6645333 | Johnson et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
6676785 | Johnson et al. | Jan 2004 | B2 |
6702365 | Semple et al. | Mar 2004 | B2 |
6745470 | Foster et al. | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6814397 | Henderson et al. | Nov 2004 | B2 |
6843525 | Preisler | Jan 2005 | B2 |
6871904 | Bhat et al. | Mar 2005 | B2 |
6893076 | Lewis | May 2005 | B1 |
6902228 | Kikuchi | Jun 2005 | B2 |
6941875 | Norton | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945591 | Durand | Sep 2005 | B2 |
6945865 | Turek | Sep 2005 | B1 |
7152911 | McNulty et al. | Dec 2006 | B1 |
7322640 | Ni et al. | Jan 2008 | B2 |
20050057073 | Hunt | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050093339 | Klassen | May 2005 | A1 |
20050225117 | Miskech et al. | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060043771 | Ehrlich | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060087152 | Kuriakose | Apr 2006 | A1 |
20060121244 | Godwin et al. | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060123725 | Godwin | Jun 2006 | A1 |
20060179733 | Padmanabhan | Aug 2006 | A1 |
20060201081 | Godwin | Sep 2006 | A1 |
20060290158 | Cullison | Dec 2006 | A1 |
20070095092 | Wuerfel, III | May 2007 | A1 |
20070216197 | Wuerfel, III | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20070222247 | Jaeck | Sep 2007 | A1 |
20080001430 | Booher | Jan 2008 | A1 |
20080169674 | Giles | Jul 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60782013 | Mar 2006 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
Parent | 11686040 | Mar 2007 | US |
Child | 11743405 | US |