The present invention relates to optical communications networks, and in particular to methods and systems for carrier recovery in a coherent optical receiver.
In the optical communications space, techniques used to detect data modulated onto an optical signal may be broadly grouped into two classes, namely “direct” detection and “coherent” detection. In “direct” detection techniques, the optical signal is made incident on a photodetector. The electrical current appearing at the photodetector output is proportional to the optical power. Data modulated onto the optical signal power using an amplitude-modulation scheme, such as On-Off Keying (OOK) can thus be detected by analysis of the photodetector output current. Direct detection techniques have advantages in terms of low cost, and high reliability for On-Off Keying (OOK) based modulation schemes. As a result, the majority of optical receivers currently used in optical communications networks are based on direct detection.
In “coherent” detection techniques, the optical signal is mixed with a strong, narrow-line-width, local oscillator signal by an optical hybrid, and the combined signal made incident on one or more photodetectors. In some systems, the inbound optical signal is first split into orthogonal polarizations, and each polarization processed by a respective optical hybrid. In-phase and Quadrature components of each polarization can be detected using respective photodetectors positioned to receive corresponding signals output by the optical hybrid. The frequency spectrum of the electrical current appearing at the photodetector output(s) is substantially proportional to the convolution of the received optical signal and the local oscillator, and contains a signal component lying at an intermediate frequency that contains the data. Consequently, this “data component” can be isolated and detected by electronically filtering and processing the photodetector output current.
Coherent detection receivers offer numerous advantages over direct detection receivers, many of which follow from the fact that coherent detection techniques provide both phase and amplitude information of the optical signal. As such, more robust modulation schemes, such as binary phase shift keying (BPSK), quadrature phase shift keying (QPSK), and quadrature amplitude modulation (QAM) can be used.
However, receivers based on coherent detection techniques have suffered disadvantages that have, to date, prevented successful deployment in “real-world” installed communications networks. In particular, both the transmitted carrier signal and the local oscillator signal are generated by respective Tx and LO lasers, which, in the case of “real world” network systems, will be semi-conductor laser. As is well known in the art, such lasers exhibit a finite line width and non-zero phase noise. Semiconductor lasers typically used in optical communications system are governed by a control loop which maintains a desired average laser output frequency. However, frequency transients as high as ±400 MHz at rates of up to 50 kHz are common. In addition, many such lasers often exhibit a maximum line width tolerance of about ±2 MHz. As a result, even when the Tx and LO lasers are operating at nominally the same frequency, a mismatch or offset of as much as ±4 MHz can still exist. Short period phase noise in both of the Tx and LO lasers may significantly increase the frequency mismatch beyond this amount.
In a coherent receiver, a frequency mismatch between the received carrier (that is, the Tx laser) and the LO appears as a time varying phase error of detected symbols. When the phase error reaches π/4 for QPSK or π/2 for BPSK, a “cycle-slip” can occur, in which symbols can be erroneously interpreted as lying in an adjacent quadrant. This can result in the erroneous interpretation of every symbol (and thus all data) following the cycle-slip. Accordingly, it is desirable to be able to track and compensate the frequency offset between the Tx carrier and LO signal frequencies. A carrier recovery circuit capable of generating the required carrier error signal, even for BPSK/QPSK signals in which the carrier is suppressed, is described in “Phase Noise-Tolerant Synchronous QPSK/BPSK Baseband-Type Intradyne Receiver Concept With Feedforward Carrier Recovery”, R Noé, Journal of Lightwave Technology, Vol. 23, No. 2, February 2005, and illustrated in
As may be seen in
It is important to note that the X and Y polarizations in Noé are the received polarizations. These do not in general match the transmitted polarizations due to the polarization dynamics of the fiber.
A limitation of this arrangement is that the analog carrier recovery circuit 12 is an inherently narrow-band device. In particular, the Intermediate Frequency (IF) linewidth of the carrier recovery circuit 12 is proportional to the bit error rate (BER): increasing the IF linewidth increases the frequency mis-match that can be corrected by the carrier recovery circuit 12, but at a cost of increasing the BER of the baseband signal D. The moderate-to-severe impairments (e.g. chromatic dispersion, Inter-Symbol Interference-ISI, Polarization Dependent Loss-PDL, Polarization Mode Dispersion-PMD, etc.) encountered in “real-world” installed networks compound this difficulty. Even without an impaired optical signal, Noé's experimental results suggest that in order to achieve an industry-standard 10−9 BER, the maximum permissible IF linewidth would have to be on the order of 1.8 MHz (for a 10 Gbaud QPSK single-polarization system). Such a low IF linewidth necessitates the use of high-precision lasers having a line width of ≦1 MHz, and extremely low transient excursions from the desired frequency. Such lasers are very expensive, and thus are not normally used in communications systems. Clearly, the methods of Noécannot be use with semiconductor lasers of the type commonly used in communications networks, having a line width on the order of ±2 MHz and frequency transients of ±400 MHz.
An additional limitation of Noé's system is that analog circuits are notoriously well known for their inability to adapt to changes following manufacture. At best, the analog carrier recovery circuit of Noé may be able to compensate for performance drift due to component heating, and possibly aging effects. However, a carrier recovery circuit optimized for 10 Gbaud single-polarization signals will not be able to accommodate a polarization-multiplexed 40 GBaud signal.
Accordingly, methods and techniques that enable carrier recovery in a receiver unit of an optical network remain highly desirable.
An object of the present invention is to provide methods and techniques that enable carrier recovery in a receiver unit of an optical network.
Thus, an aspect of the present invention provides a method of carrier recovery from a high speed optical signal received through an optical communications network. A stream of multi-bit digital samples of the optical signal is processed to generate a multi-bit estimate X′(n) of each one of a plurality of transmitted symbols. A phase of each symbol estimate X′(n) is rotated, and a respective symbol phase error Δφ(n) of the rotated symbol estimate determined.
Further features and advantages of the present invention will become apparent from the following detailed description, taken in combination with the appended drawings, in which:
a and 3b schematically illustrate respective different optical signals formats usable in the coherent optical receiver of
a and 8b are charts illustrating operation of the decision circuit of
a and 9b are charts illustrate operation of the combiner of
a and 10b are charts illustrating operation of the decision circuit of
a and 12b schematically illustrate respective different sample blocks generated by the distribution unit of
a and 13b schematically illustrate further respective different sample blocks generated by the distribution unit of
It will be noted that throughout the appended drawings, like features are identified by like reference numerals.
The present invention provides methods and techniques that enable carrier recovery in a receiver unit of an optical network. Embodiments of the present invention are described below, by way of example only, with reference to
In general, the present invention provides a system in which carrier recovery is performed in the digital domain, downstream of digital chromatic dispersion and polarization compensation functions.
In the coherent optical receiver of
As may be appreciated, the resolution of the A/D converters 22 is a balance between performance and cost. Increasing the resolution improves sampling accuracy, and thereby improves the extent to which signal distortions can be corrected by downstream dispersion and polarization compensators as well as the accuracy of carrier recovery. However, this increased accuracy is obtained at a cost of increased complexity, silicon area and heat generation. It has been found that a resolution of less than 4 bits is insufficient for satisfactory dispersion and polarization compensation. In practice, a resolution of between 5 and 8 bits provides satisfactory performance, at an acceptable cost.
a and 3b illustrate representative optical signal formats which may be used in conjunction with embodiments of the present invention. In each of the illustrated embodiments, the optical signal includes nominally regularly spaced SYNC bursts 24 embedded within a stream of data symbols 26. Each SYNC burst 24 has a respective predetermined symbol (or, equivalently, bit) sequence on each transmitted polarization. The symbol (bit) sequences of each polarization are preferably transmitted simultaneously, but this is not necessary. In the embodiment of
Returning to
The dispersion-compensated sample streams appearing at the output of the dispersion compensators 28 are then supplied to a polarization compensator 30 which operates to compensate polarization effects, and thereby de-convolve transmitted symbols from the complex sample streams output from the dispersion compensators 28. If desired, the polarization compensator 30 may operate as described in Applicant's co-pending U.S. patent application Ser. No. 11/294,613 filed Dec. 6, 2005. Thus, for example, the polarization compensator 30 may be configured as a Finite Impulse Response (FIR) filter which implements an Inverse Jones matrix. In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
In a Training mode of the receiver, the output of each FIR filter 32 is multiplied by the conjugate of the known SYNC symbols SX(i) and SY(i), and summed (at 34) to compute respective correlations between the dispersion compensated samples of the SYNC burst 24 and the known SYNC symbols. On the other hand, in a data detection mode of the receiver, the FIR outputs are summed (at 34) to generate multi-bit symbol estimates X′(n) and Y′(n) containing both amplitude and phase information of each transmitted symbol. In some embodiments, the symbol estimates X′(n) and Y′(n) are 10-bit digital values, comprising 5-bits for each of the real and imaginary parts. These estimated symbol values include phase error due to the frequency offset between the Tx and LO frequencies, laser line width and phase noise.
The polarization compensator 30 outputs are then supplied to a carrier recovery block 36 (see
In the embodiment of
at 48 which is then used for the start of data detection. If desired, the inverse-tangent computation may be performed using a look-up table.
Once the SYNC symbols 24 have been processed, the receiver switches to the data correction mode, during which the symbol phase error Δφ is updated at the symbol rate and used for rotating the phase of each successive data symbol estimate. This operation will be described in greater detail below.
In general, the carrier detector loop computes the phase rotation κ(n) which compensates phase errors of the symbol estimates X′(n) and Y′(n). In the illustrated embodiments, this is accomplished by implementing first and second order carrier detector functions. Thus, for example, each successive value of the phase rotation κ(n) may be computed using a function of the form:
κ(n+1)=κ(n)+μ1Δφ(n+1)+μ1Ψ(n+1);
where: the first-order term μ1Δφ(n+1) relates to the phase difference between the rotated symbol estimate and the corresponding recovered symbol; and the second order term μ2Ψ(n+1) is derived from a frequency offset parameter ψ(n) which models the frequency offset or mismatch Δf between the Tx and LO lasers. As will be appreciated, the first order term will vary from symbol-to-symbol, and therefore reflects the effects of phase noise of the Tx and LO lasers. As will be described in greater detail below, the second order term integrates phase differences over time, and thus is a comparatively slow-varying value which follows laser frequency excursions but is otherwise insensitive to phase noise. The scaling factors μ1 and μ2 may be programmable, and define the respective phase adjustment step size for each term.
In the embodiment of
The phase rotator 44 uses the symbol phase error Δφ(n+1) to compute the frequency offset parameter ψ(n), and finally the total carrier phase error κ(n+1). The frequency offset parameter ψ(n), which is proportional to the frequency difference Δf between the Tx and LO frequencies, may conveniently be computed by accumulating successive symbol phase error values. Thus Ψ(n+1)=Ψ(n)+Δφ(n+1). Taken together, the first and second order terms μ1Δφ(n+1) and μ2Ψ(n+1) provide an estimate of the incremental phase change Δκ between the nth and (n+1)th symbols. Accumulating this incremental value Δκ for each successive data symbol yields the updated carrier phase estimate κ(n+1).
At the completion of each block 26 of data symbols, the final value of the frequency offset parameter ψ(N) can be stored for use as the initial frequency offset parameter ψ0 for the next block of data symbols.
In the embodiment of
In the embodiment of
Larger step sizes can be obtained by suitable selection of the scaling factor μ1.
The second order phase rotation block 64 operates to compute and apply phase rotations due to the frequency offset Δf between the Tx and LO lasers. One way of accomplishing this is to compute the frequency offset parameter Ψ(n) by accumulating successive symbol phase errors, this Ψ(n+1)=Ψ(n)+Δφ(n+1). The frequency offset parameter ψ(n) can be selected to obtain the second order phase rotation μ2·Ψ(n). In the embodiment of
The starting phase Ω(n0) is simply the accumulated phase angle at the end of the previous update cycle. The incremental phase change for each symbol Si (0≦i≦[p−1]) of the update cycle is derived from a frequency offset parameter ψ(n0) which is computed by summing the symbol phase errors Δφ(n) over the previous update cycle. Thus,
and the incremental phase change for each symbol Si of the incremental cycle is μ2i·Ψ(n0). With this notation, the starting phase Ω(n0) of the current update cycle is the total of the incremental phase changes through the previous update cycle, thus Ω(n0)=Ω(n0−p)+μ2p·Ψ(n0−p). The scaling factor μ2 may be a programmable value based on a desired carrier recovery loop bandwidth. In some embodiments
may be implemented as
in cases where the symbol phase estimate θ′(n) is represented as an 8-bit digital word.
As in the embodiment of
A simplified symbol phase error detection can be performed by recognising that the 3rd MSB, b5, indicates the sense of the phase error, that is, whether the rotated phase estimate θX(n) leads or lags the correct symbol phase. As such, the 3rd MSB, b5, may be referred to as a state-splitting bit (SSB) and used as a single-bit symbol phase error ΔφX(n). Combining the corresponding phase errors ΔφX(n) and ΔφY(n) of both polarizations, for example using the look-up table function of
The foregoing description particularly discusses carrier recovery and symbol detection for the case of QPSK symbols and a dual-polarization (i.e. a polarization multiplexed) optical signal. However, it will be appreciated that the embodiments of
Different signal formats can be handled by suitably selecting the behaviour of the phase detector 42 and decision block 40. For example, in the case of a BPSK signal, both symbols lie on the I-axis (see
In the embodiments of
For simplicity of explanation, the methods described above are causal, in that the phase rotation κ(n+1) applied to each symbol estimate is a function of only those symbols which precede it in the given direction of processing. For improved performance, the estimation of the phase rotation κ(n+1) can be noncausal by being a function of the symbols both before and after the given symbol. One way of implementing such an arrangement is with additional hardware that does preliminary phase estimates for the symbols after the given symbol. These preliminary estimates can be used before the final estimates are determined.
In the embodiments of
Dispersion in the optical path between transmitter and receiver means that the phase of the received optical signal at a given instant is a function of the phase of many transmitted symbols, those symbols generally having an evolution of transmitted phase noise. Dispersion equalization before carrier recovery removes these effects, eliminates the interference from the symbol patterns, and allows the evolution of the phase noise to be tracked.
The embodiments described above with reference to
As may be seen in
In the embodiment of
In the illustrated embodiments, the distribution unit 70 is implemented as a “burst switch” controlled by a framer 72, to generate overlapping blocks of samples 74 (
a shows an embodiment in which each block of samples 74 encompasses two consecutive SYNC bursts 24, and any data symbols 26 lying between them. In this case, the amount of overlap 76 between sample blocks 74 in adjacent data paths is nominally equivalent to one SYNC burst 24. In some cases, it may desirable to increase the amount of overlap (e.g. by about the width of the polarization compensators) to ensure continuity of polarization compensation across all of the samples encompassing both of the involved SYNC bursts 24.
In the embodiment of
Returning to
As described above, carrier phase tracking and decoding of data symbols is based on initial frequency offset and symbol phase estimates obtained by processing the SYNC burst 24. Clearly, this operation presumes that the SYNC burst 24 is processed before the data samples. For cases in which SYNC burst 24 leads the data samples within the optical signal or sample block 74, this operation is obvious. However, it will also be appreciated that by selecting the order in which data samples are read from the distribution block 70, it is possible to reverse the time-order of the sample stream, so that the above-described methods can be used to process data samples that lead the SYNC burst 24 in the optical signal. Thus, for example, the sample blocks of
In spite of the increase in complexity implied by the use of parallel forward and reverse processing paths, this arrangement can be beneficial in that it limits the effects of cycle slips. In particular, when a cycle slip occurs, all of the symbols lying between the slip location and the next SYNC burst 24 may be erroneously decoded. Dividing each sample block 74 into independently processed sub-blocks constrains the effects of a cycle slip to the involved sub-block. This is equivalent to doubling the repetition rate of the SYNC bursts 24, but without the attendant penalty of doubling the overhead.
The embodiments of the invention described above are intended to be illustrative only. The scope of the invention is therefore intended to be limited solely by the scope of the appended claims.
This application claims benefit under 35 U.S.C. 119(e) from U.S. Provisional Patent Application Ser. No. 60/728,751, entitled Automatic Gain Control, which was filed on Oct. 21, 2005.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
4506388 | Monerie et al. | Mar 1985 | A |
4720827 | Kanaji | Jan 1988 | A |
4723316 | Glance | Feb 1988 | A |
4965858 | Naito et al. | Oct 1990 | A |
5457563 | Van Deventer | Oct 1995 | A |
5473463 | Van Deventer | Dec 1995 | A |
5995512 | Pogue et al. | Nov 1999 | A |
6473222 | Hait et al. | Oct 2002 | B2 |
6607311 | Fishman et al. | Aug 2003 | B1 |
6782211 | Core | Aug 2004 | B1 |
20020012152 | Agazzi et al. | Jan 2002 | A1 |
20020186435 | Shpantzer et al. | Dec 2002 | A1 |
20030063285 | Pering et al. | Apr 2003 | A1 |
20030123884 | Willner et al. | Jul 2003 | A1 |
20030175034 | Noe | Sep 2003 | A1 |
20040114939 | Taylor | Jun 2004 | A1 |
20050196176 | Sun et al. | Sep 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1453239 | Sep 2004 | EP |
2214381 | Aug 1989 | GB |
WO 0060776 | Oct 2000 | WO |
WO 0227994 | Apr 2002 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60728751 | Oct 2005 | US |