This application is a nationalization under 35 U.S.C. § 371 from International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050498, filed Apr. 26, 2011 and published as WO 2011/136726 A1 on Nov. 3, 2011, which claims the priority benefit of Sweden Application Serial No. 1050417-3, filed Apr. 27, 2010, the contents of which applications and publication are incorporated herein by reference in their entirety.
Carton feeder system and method for simultaneously feeding a plurality of cartons to a conveyor track using a plurality of pick-up heads.
In the industry concerned with packing smaller objects such as tubes, bottles and the like in carton boxes, there is a constant need to increase the productivity of the packing machines. One aspect of a packing machine is the number of units that the machine can handle during a specific time interval. There are different ways of achieving a higher throughput in such a machine. One way is to reduce the cycle time for each object, i.e. to allow more objects to pass the machine during the same time interval. Such a solution is often difficult to achieve since it may involve a redesign of the machine and at some point, it is not possible to reduce the cycle time for a specific operation. Another way to increase the throughput in a production line is to use several parallel machines, at least for some operations. Such a solution requires more space and is not as cost-effective, but may be a possibility when an older production line is to be upgrades.
One type of machine that there may be a need to improve is the machine that pick up pre-glued folded paper cartons, erects them and feeds them to a conveyor track. On the conveyor track, the cartons continue to the next station, in which a tube or the like is inserted into the carton, with or without an instruction leaflet. The side flaps of the carton is then folded and the carton is closed, eventually also sealed, and packed in larger shipping units.
EP 1594745 B1 describes a carton manipulation and feeder apparatus, which is adapted to pick up folded, pre-glued cartons from a hopper, erects them and to feed them to a conveyor track. The cartons are erected to a square shape and are inserted at the infeed end of the conveyor track. The cartons are inserted between lugs attached to the conveyor track and having a distance between them that corresponds to the width of the carton to be inserted. In order to be able to feed the carton to the conveyor track, the carton is inserted at the infeed end of the conveyor track, where the conveyor chain changes direction and is conveyed on a wheel. In this end region of the conveyor track, the lugs are angled apart due to the conveyor wheel, which allows the erected cartons to be inserted between the lugs. When the carton is inserted and the chain has moved somewhat, the lugs will be perpendicular to the conveyor chain again and will hold the carton in position.
EP 0800450 B1 describes another carton transfer assembly adapted to transfer folded cartons from a hopper, open them and transfer them to a conveyor. The cartons are opened by an extensible rod. The opened cartons are inserted in carton pockets provided between chain lugs. The length of the carton pocket is longer than the carton itself, thereby allowing the opened carton to be inserted into the carton pocket during the rotation of the rotary feeder.
U.S. Pat. No. 7,328,561 B2 describes an apparatus for erecting boxes and setting them on a conveyor. The apparatus pick up folded boxes from a magazine, erects them and inserts them into conveyor cells on a conveyor track. The cartons are erected to a square shape by an erecting element and are inserted at the infeed end of the conveyor track. The cartons are inserted between lugs attached to the conveyor track and having a distance between them that corresponds to the width of the carton to be inserted. In order to be able to feed the carton to the conveyor track, the carton is inserted at the infeed end of the conveyor track, where the conveyor chain changes direction and is conveyed on a wheel. In this end region of the conveyor track, the lugs are angled apart due to the conveyor wheel, which allows the erected cartons to be inserted between the lugs. When the carton is inserted and the chain has moved somewhat, the lugs will be perpendicular to the conveyor chain again and will hold the carton in position. The height of the rear lug is substantially lower than the front lug in order to facilitate the insertion of the box. This requires two lugs for each box.
U.S. Pat. No. 5,573,490 describes an apparatus for erecting a folding box and folding its closure tabs before it is transferred into a conveyor device. The insertion of the erected boxes into the conveyor device is not described.
U.S. Pat. No. 4,331,436 describes a device for erecting and countercollapsing boxes from preformed blanks. The erected box may then be fed to a conveyor belt having compartment dividers adapted to hold the boxes. The boxes enter at the infeed end of the conveyor belt, where the conveyor belt changes direction and is conveyed on a wheel. In this end region of the conveyor belt, the compartment dividers are angled apart due to the conveyor wheel, which allows the erected boxes to enter between the compartment dividers.
These solutions may work well for some applications, but may be inflexible, especially when the throughput of the system is to be increased. There is thus room for improvements.
An object of the invention is therefore to provide a carton feeding system comprising a plurality of pick-up heads that can insert cartons between parallel conveyor teeth. A further object of the invention is to provide a carton feeding system that can insert a plurality of cartons simultaneously in a conveyor track. A further object of the invention is to provide a method for simultaneously feeding a plurality of cartons to a conveyor track.
In a carton feeding system for feeding a plurality of cartons to a conveyor track, comprising a plurality of feeding devices, where each feeding device comprises a pick-up head with a plurality of vacuum cups, and an erecting finger pivotally suspended at the pick-up head, where the pick-up head has a pick-up position in which the holding plane of the pick-up head is positioned parallel to the folded carton blank that is to be picked up, and an insertion position in which the erecting finger is pivoted with respect to the holding plane of the pick-up head in such a way that the carton is opened, the object of the invention is achieved in that at least two cartons are inserted simultaneously into the conveyor track.
By this first embodiment of the carton feeding system according to the invention, a carton feeding system is obtained that can insert cartons simultaneously into a continuously moving conveyor track having parallel teeth. This is achieved in that the cartons are held in a rhombic shape during the insertion and that the distance between the teeth corresponds to the erected carton, or in that the cartons are inserted in a rectangular shape and that the teeth comprises resilient elements. The rhombic shape of the cartons decreases the horizontal extension of the cartons during the insertion and provides some space between the cartons and the teeth. This space constitutes the tolerance that is needed to be able to insert a carton in a holding space with the same width as the carton itself. The insertion tolerance can also be obtained with the resilient means that allows rectangular cartons to be inserted into the conveyor track.
One advantage of being able to insert cartons when the teeth are parallel is that the cartons may be inserted on the straight conveyor track and not only at the infeed region at the end of the conveyor track. This in turn makes it possible to mount several mounting devices next to each other along the conveyor track. The mounting devices can then insert cartons simultaneously which allows for an increased insertion rate of the feeding system.
The rhombic shape of the carton is preferably such that the angle α, which is the angle between the upper wall and one of the side walls of the carton, is in the region between 50 and 80 degrees, and more preferably between 60 and 70 degrees. It is preferred to counterfold the cartons prior to the insertion, i.e. to open the cartons by more than 90 degrees, preferably in the region of between 100 to 140 degrees. This is of advantage since the carton will then be pretensioned towards a rectangular shape, instead of towards the original flat-folded shape. This in turn will make it easier to hold the erected carton in the conveyor track. A holding protrusion may be provided at one of the teeth in order to hold the carton in position. When the carton is inserted into the conveyor track, a hold down element may be used to stop the carton from escaping the conveyor track.
When the cartons are inserted in a rectangular shape, it is also of advantage to counterfold the cartons prior to the insertion. This will help the cartons to hold the rectangular shape during the insertion of objects into the carton at a later stage.
The invention will be described in greater detail in the following, with reference to the embodiments that are shown in the attached drawings, in which
The embodiments of the invention with further developments described in the following are to be regarded only as examples and are in no way to limit the scope of the protection provided by the patent claims. Rectangular cartons are used in the examples. Quadratic cartons may of course also be fed by the feeding device.
In
Since the pick-up head feeds the cartons mainly in the vertical direction, from the pick-up position to the insertion position that is positioned substantially beneath the pick-up position, the pick-up head is relatively compact in the horizontal direction. This makes it possible to position several pick-up heads close to each other along the conveyor track. When the pick-up heads move along the same path simultaneously, it is possible to mount the pick-up heads such that the spacing corresponds to two cartons, i.e. such that a carton can be inserted in every other holding space of the conveyor track by the pick-up heads. With two groups of pick-up heads, it is then possible to fill all holding spaces of the conveyor track.
In
When the carton blank is extracted from the magazine, the pick-up head 8 continues the movement towards the insertion position. During this movement, the erecting fingers will rotate relative the pick-up head, such that the angle between the holding plane of the vacuum cups and the bearing surface of the erecting fingers will decrease. The angle between the holding plane of the vacuum cups and the bearing surface of the erecting fingers will be referred to as angle α. In
In
From the position shown in
The pick-up head with a carton that is inserted into the holding space of the conveyor track is shown in
The pick-up head will move with more or less the same speed as the conveyor track, in the moving direction of the conveyor track, between the position as shown in
In the shown example, the carton is counterfolded by 30 degrees, and a suitable range for the counterfolding is between 10 to 40 degrees, depending e.g. on the speed of the conveyor track. The carton will thus have some built-in tension that will force the carton back to its rectangular shape. The carton will thus, either alone or with the aid of the hold down element, obtain its rectangular shape when it is released from the pick-up head and the erecting fingers. Since the distance w between the teeth corresponds to the size of the rectangular carton, the carton will thus be held in a secure position by the conveyor track. The leading teeth 18 may also be provided with a protrusion 22 at the top of each tooth that will help to hold the carton in position. In the shown example, where the carton is counterfolded, the protrusion points towards the holding space of the conveyor track. In this way, the carton will not be able to spring back due to the built-in tension. Depending on the way the carton is erected and inserted, the protrusions may also be provided at the trailing teeth of the conveyor track.
In another example of the inventive carton feeding device, the erecting fingers will erect the carton blanks by an angle of less than 90 degrees. In this example, a carton is not opened completely before it is inserted into the holding space of the conveyor track. The angle α between the holding plane of the pick-up head and the bearing surface of the erecting fingers is in this embodiment between 100 and 140 degrees, and is preferably around 120 degrees. In this example, the hold down element 24 is essential, since the pretension in the carton will be in the direction to return the partly opened carton to the carton blank state, i.e. to retract.
When the carton is released from the pick-up head, it continues to travel with the conveyor track and the pick-up head continues its movement along the path shown in
The shown carton feeding device is capable of reaching an insertion rate of up to 150 insertions per minute. When a higher insertion rate is desirable, the inventive carton feeding device is well suited to be assembled in groups of several carton feeding devices, thus allowing the insertion rate to increase. The carton feeding device is relatively compact in the lengthwise direction, i.e. in the travel direction of the conveyor track. It is thus possible to mount several carton feeding devices next to each other. When several carton feeding devices are mounted next to each other, every second holding space may be inserted with a carton at the same time. By mounting two groups of carton feeding devices next to each other, all holding spaces of the conveyor track may be filled.
Another advantage of dividing the insertion of cartons to several insertion devices is the feeding of cartons from the magazine. One problem that arises when the number of cartons that are to be inserted into a conveyor track is increased with a conventional feeding device using a single pick-up head, is the feeding of cartons to the pick-up head from the magazine. When feeding all the cartons from a single magazine, it is difficult to provide constant feeding properties for the carton. The pressure on the carton stack varies with the number of cartons, which affects the feeding of a carton to the feeding position. Since the lead time for picking up a carton is decreased, the timing for the suction heads is more sensitive which in turn makes it more difficult to provide an accurate pick-up of a carton. A shorter pick-up time calls for a lower holding force of the carton in the magazine, but a decrease in the holding force will affect the repeatability of the feeding of cartons. It is therefore an advantage to divide the feeding of cartons to several magazines. This will allow for a proper and accurate pick-up of a carton with a high repeatability.
A second embodiment of a carton feeding device 100 is shown in
The shape of the bent spring is adapted to allow a fully erected carton to be inserted. The upper part of the resilient element constitutes an entrance region 127. This is shaped such that the carton can enter the holding space without damage and will deflect when the carton is inserted. The lower part of the resilient element constitutes a holding region 128 and will hold the carton in position when the carton is inserted and released from the pick-up head.
The inner chain is provided with leading teeth 118 that will support the front walls of the cartons through a resilient element 126. The resilient element 126 protrudes from the rearward face of the tooth and may be designed in different ways. In the shown example, the resilient element 126 resembles the resilient element 125. The resilient element 126 also comprises an entrance region 127 and a holding region 128. The resilient element 126 further comprises a holding protrusion 122 formed between the entrance region 127 and the holding region 128. The holding protrusion 122 will help to hold the carton in position and will prevent the carton from springing back due to the pretension in the carton. It is also possible to provide the resilient element 125 with holding protrusions.
Between the trailing teeth 119 and the leading tooth 118, a holding space 121 for a carton is created, in which the carton is inserted and further conveyed. The distance between the teeth are in this embodiment larger than the width of the erected carton, and the distance between the surfaces of the unloaded resilient elements 125 and 126 is smaller than the width of the erected carton. The resilient elements ensure that the cartons are securely held in place during the subsequent insertion of an object into the carton. A hold down element 124 may also in this embodiment be arranged to stop the inserted cartons from escaping upwards, out of the holding space. The moving direction of the conveyor track is indicated by an arrow 123. Two longitudinal rails 129 are arranged between the teeth in the lengthwise direction of the conveyor track, similar to the rails 25 described above.
In
The pick-up head will move with more or less the same speed as the conveyor track during the insertion of the carton. Small speed differences, e.g. due to an acceleration at the beginning of the insertion, are allowed since the resilient elements will provide a tolerance between the teeth and the carton.
When the carton is released from the pick-up head, it continues to travel with the conveyor track and the pick-up head continues its movement along its movement path, which resembles the path shown in
In some cases, the glue that glues the carton together may also cause the carton blank to stick some such that it will be more difficult to erect the carton. The erecting fingers may then not be able to erect the carton without damage to the exterior of the carton. For this reason, the carton feeding device may be provided with an opening head 14, shown in
In the inventive system, several feeding devices are mounted side by side along the conveyor track. A first embodiment of the inventive system is shown in
A second embodiment of the inventive system is shown in
In the inventive system, it is possible to insert a plurality of cartons at the same time. In this way, it is easy to adapt the number of cartons that are to be inserted by altering the number of used feeding devices. By using two groups of feeding devices, it is also possible to fill every holding space of the conveyor track. This increases the efficiency of the system since more cartons can be processed in the same time. It is possible to use different numbers of feeding devices in a feeding system, and to group them in different numbers of groups.
The inventive solution allows for a high insertion rate of the system. In one preferred example, eight feeding devices grouped in two groups are used, where each carton feeding device is capable of inserting up to 150 cartons per minute, which results in a complete insertion system capable of inserting 1200 cartons per minute. The first group inserts a carton in every second holding space and the second group inserts a carton in every other holding space. In this way, a compact, fast and reliable insertion station is obtained. In order to increase the throughput further, it would be possible to e.g. use three groups of feeding devices spaced apart by two cartons each, with each group comprising four feeding devices. When each group inserts every third carton, a throughput of 1800 cartons per minute could be reached. Depending on the requirements of the system, other number of groups with other numbers of feeding devices is also possible to use.
The invention is not to be regarded as being limited to the embodiments described above, a number of additional variants and modifications being possible within the scope of the subsequent patent claims. It is e.g. possible to arrange the pick-up heads in more groups than two and to use any number of pick-up heads in a group. It is also possible to position the erecting fingers on the other side of the pick-up heads, i.e. to mirror-invert the pick-up heads.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
1050417 | Apr 2010 | SE | national |
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/SE2011/050498 | 4/26/2011 | WO | 00 | 10/23/2012 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2011/136726 | 11/3/2011 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3242827 | Winters | Mar 1966 | A |
3633470 | Bingham | Jan 1972 | A |
3956976 | Vogel et al. | May 1976 | A |
4011799 | Chidsey | Mar 1977 | A |
4194442 | Martelli | Mar 1980 | A |
4331436 | Kuttenbaum et al. | May 1982 | A |
4518301 | Greenwell | May 1985 | A |
4537587 | Langen | Aug 1985 | A |
4871348 | Konaka | Oct 1989 | A |
4881934 | Harston et al. | Nov 1989 | A |
5024640 | Saitoh | Jun 1991 | A |
5049119 | Bershadsky | Sep 1991 | A |
5061231 | Dietrich et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5078669 | Dietrich et al. | Jan 1992 | A |
5102385 | Calvert | Apr 1992 | A |
5215515 | Bershadsky | Jun 1993 | A |
5298008 | Decker et al. | Mar 1994 | A |
5411464 | Calvert et al. | May 1995 | A |
5573490 | Steinbrenner et al. | Nov 1996 | A |
5613828 | Haddow et al. | Mar 1997 | A |
5662577 | Reuteler | Sep 1997 | A |
5687874 | Omori et al. | Nov 1997 | A |
5713187 | Peterson et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
6168149 | Boldrini | Jan 2001 | B1 |
6503180 | Plueschow et al. | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6669616 | Bierenacki et al. | Dec 2003 | B1 |
6699165 | Krieger et al. | Mar 2004 | B1 |
6764436 | Mazurek et al. | Jul 2004 | B1 |
7310925 | Monti | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7328561 | Fochler | Feb 2008 | B2 |
7695421 | Ford | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8686222 | Samuel et al. | Apr 2014 | B2 |
20130121799 | Lundgren et al. | May 2013 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
1022959 | Jan 1958 | DE |
4414018 | Nov 1994 | DE |
10114044 | Oct 2002 | DE |
0425226 | May 1991 | EP |
0331325 | Nov 1994 | EP |
0900753 | Mar 1999 | EP |
1174256 | Jan 2002 | EP |
0800450 | Oct 2003 | EP |
1594745 | Oct 2006 | EP |
846891 | Aug 1960 | GB |
2053133 | Feb 1981 | GB |
2429965 | Mar 2007 | GB |
11-079134 | Mar 1999 | JP |
2002-544067 | Dec 2002 | JP |
2009-012303 | Jan 2009 | JP |
2013-507919 | Mar 2013 | JP |
WO-0023325 | Apr 2000 | WO |
Entry |
---|
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050498, International Search Report dated Jun. 27, 2011”, 6 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050498, Written Opinion dated Jun. 27, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Final Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed Jul. 10, 2013 to Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 11, 2013”, 8 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed Nov. 22, 2013 to Non Final Office Action dated Jul. 22, 2013”, 15 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Restriction Requirement dated Jun. 11, 2013”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050497, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Apr. 11, 2012”, 9 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050497, International Search Report dated Aug. 15, 2011”, 8 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050497, Response filed Feb. 27, 2012 to Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2011”, 4 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050497, Written Opinion dated Aug. 15, 2011”, 5 pgs. |
“International Application Serial No. PCT/SE2011/050498, International Preliminary Report on Patentability dated Oct. 30, 2012”, 5 pgs. |
“Machine Translation of DE1022959, issued Jan. 16, 1958”, (Specification and Claims), 4 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed Nov. 4, 2014 to Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2014”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Non Final Office Action dated Aug. 1, 2014”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Preliminary Amendment dated Oct. 23, 2012”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Advisory Action dated Mar. 13, 2015”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Appeal Brief filed May 19, 2015”, 16 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Decision on Pre-Appeal Brief Request dated Apr. 15, 2015”, 2 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Final Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2014”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Pre-Appeal Brief Request filed Mar. 19, 2015”, 5 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed Feb. 20, 2015 to Final Office Action dated Nov. 20, 2014”, 11 pgs. |
“Chinese Application Serial No. 201180021241.9, Second Office Action dated May 22, 2015”, (English Translation), 9 pgs. |
“Japanese Application Serial No. 2013-507919, Office Action dated Jan. 5, 2015”, (w/ English Translation), 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Appeal Decision dated May 3, 2016”, 9 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Notice of Allowance dated Jul. 20, 2016”, 7 Pgs. |
“Indonesian Application Serial No. W00201204211. Office Action dated Jun. 9, 2016”, (w/concise description of relevance), 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Final Office Action dated May 26, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2017”, 6 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed May 15, 2017 to Non Final Office Action dated Feb. 15, 2017”, 7 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed Mar. 6, 2014 to Final Office Action dated Dec. 6, 2013”, 10 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Advisory Action dated Sep. 1, 2017”, 3 pgs. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Examiner Interview Summary dated Aug. 11, 2017”, 1 pg. |
“U.S. Appl. No. 13/643,025, Response filed Aug. 24, 2017 to Final Office Action dated May 26, 2017”, 10 pgs. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130039731 A1 | Feb 2013 | US |