The present invention relates generally to gas turbine engines, and, more specifically, to turbine blades therein.
In a gas turbine engine, air is pressurized in a compressor and mixed with fuel for generating combustion gases in a combustor. Various turbine stages extract energy from the combustion gases to power the engine and produce work.
A high pressure turbine (HPT) immediately follows the combustor and extracts energy from the hottest combustion gases to power the upstream compressor through one drive shaft. A low pressure turbine (LPT) follows the HPT and extracts additional energy from the combustion gases for powering another drive shaft. The LPT powers an upstream fan in a turbofan aircraft engine application, or powers an external shaft for marine and industrial applications.
Engine efficiency and specific fuel consumption (SFC) are paramount design objectives in modern gas turbine engines. The various turbine rotor blades and their corresponding nozzle vanes have precisely configured aerodynamic surfaces for controlling the velocity and pressure distributions thereover for maximizing aerodynamic efficiency.
The corresponding airfoils of the blades and vanes have generally concave pressure sides and generally convex suction sides extending axially in chord between opposite leading and trailing edges. The airfoil has a crescent profile in radial section, increasing rapidly in width from the leading edge to a maximum width region, and then decreasing in width gradually to the trailing edge.
The circumferentially or transversely opposite sides of the airfoils also extend radially in span from root to tip. The airfoils typically have thin sidewalls formed by casting of superalloy metals, with internal cooling circuits having various embodiments all specifically tailored for efficiently cooling the airfoils during operation while maximizing efficiency.
However, aerodynamic design of turbine airfoils is remarkably complex in view of the three dimensional (3D) configurations of the individual airfoils in complete rows thereof, and the correspondingly complex flow streams of the combustion gases channeled between the airfoils during operation. Adding to this complexity of design and environment are the special flow fields around the radially outer tips of the turbine blades which rotate at high speed inside a surrounding stationary shroud during operation.
The operating clearance or gap between the blade tips and the turbine shrouds should be as small as practical for minimizing leakage of the combustion gas flow therethrough while also permitting thermal expansion and contraction of the blades and shrouds without undesirable rubbing between the rotating tips and stationary shroud.
During operation, the blades in a turbine row drive the supporting rotor disk in rotation with the airfoil suction side leading the opposite airfoil pressure side. The airfoils typically twist from root to tip in the radial direction from the perimeter of the rotor disk, and the leading edges face upstream obliquely with the engine axial centerline axis to match the oblique discharge swirl angle of the cooperating nozzle vanes. The combustion gases flow generally in the axial downstream direction, with a circumferential or tangential component first engaging the airfoil leading edges in one flow direction, and then leaving the airfoils over the trailing edges thereof in a different flow direction.
The pressure and suction sides of the airfoils have correspondingly different 3D profiles for maximizing differential pressure therebetween and energy extraction from the hot combustion gases. The concave pressure side and the convex suction side effect different velocity and pressure distributions thereover which correspondingly vary between the leading and trailing edges, and from root to tip. However, the combustion gases which leak over the airfoil tips in the required tip clearance perform little, if any, useful work.
Further complicating turbine blade design is the exposed blade tips which are therefore bathed in the combustion gases which leak thereover during operation, and require suitable cooling thereof for ensuring a long useful life of the turbine blades during operation.
Modern turbine blade design typically incorporates squealer tip ribs which are small radial extensions of the pressure and suction sides of the airfoil from leading to trailing edge. The tip ribs are typically rectangular in cross section and spaced transversely or circumferentially apart to define an open tip cavity atop the airfoil which has an integral tip floor that encloses the typically hollow airfoil and the internal cooling circuit therein.
The small tip ribs provide sacrificial material in the event of a tip rub to protect the tip floor and internal cooling circuit from undesirable damage. The tip ribs increase the complexity of the combustion gas flow field introducing local secondary fields which affect turbine efficiency, flow leakage, and tip cooling.
The primary flow direction of the combustion gases is in the axially downstream direction in the flow passages defined between adjacent blades. The axial flow stream also varies along the radial direction from root to tip of each airfoil. And, these axial and radial flow variations are further compounded over the airfoil tip where the combustion gases leak between the pressure and suction sides of each airfoil.
Accordingly, the prior art is replete with various configurations of turbine blade tips addressing different problems and performance considerations including turbine efficiency, tip leakage, and tip cooling. These three important considerations are interdependent at least in part, but the complex 3D flow fields over the different pressure and suction sides at the airfoil tip and between the leading and trailing edges renders quite complex the evaluation thereof.
However, modern computational fluid dynamics (CFD) includes powerful software that improves the ability to mathematically analyze complex 3D flow streams in gas turbine engines and provides a mechanism from which further improvements in turbine blade design may be realized.
For example, it is desired to improve turbine blade tip design by reducing tip flow leakage, or increasing turbine efficiency, or improving tip cooling, or any combination of these factors either separately or together.
A turbine blade includes an airfoil tip with first and second ribs extending along the opposite pressure and suction sides. The ribs extend outwardly from a tip floor and are joined together at opposite leading and trailing edges. A cascade tip baffle transversely bridges the two ribs above the tip floor forward of the maximum width of the tip to partition the tip chordally into corresponding tip pockets on opposite sides of the baffle.
The invention, in accordance with preferred and exemplary embodiments, together with further objects and advantages thereof, is more particularly described in the following detailed description taken in conjunction with the accompanying drawings in which:
The dovetail 16 may have any conventional form, such as the axial-entry dovetail illustrated in
During operation, combustion gases 18 are generated in the combustor of the engine (not shown) and suitably channeled downstream over the corresponding turbine blades 10 which extract energy therefrom for powering the supporting rotor disk. The individual platform 14 provides a radially inner boundary for the combustion gases and adjoins adjacent platforms in the full row of turbine blades.
The airfoil 12 illustrated in
The external surfaces of the pressure and suction sides 20,22 of the airfoil have the typical crescent shape or profile conventionally configured for effecting corresponding velocity and pressure distributions of the combustion gases thereover during operation for maximizing energy extraction from the gases.
The airfoil 12 is typically hollow and includes an internal cooling circuit 32 which may have any conventional configuration, such as the illustrated two three-pass serpentine circuits that terminate in corresponding flow passages behind the leading edge and in front of the trailing edge. The cooling circuit extends through the platform and dovetail with corresponding inlets in the base of the dovetail for receiving pressurized cooling air 34 from the compressor of the engine (not shown) in any conventional manner.
In this way, the blade is internally cooled from root to tip and between the leading and trailing edges by the internal cooling air which then may be discharged through the thin airfoil sidewalls in various rows of film cooling holes of conventional size and configuration.
Since the leading edge of the airfoil is typically subject to the hottest incoming combustion gases, dedicated cooling thereof is provided in any suitable manner. And, the thin trailing edge region of the airfoil typically includes a row of pressure side trailing edge cooling slots for discharging a portion of the spent cooling air.
As described above, the turbine airfoil 12 shown initially in
Furthermore, the relative pressure of the combustion gases on the pressure side 20 of the airfoil is higher than the pressure along the suction side of the airfoil, and along with the corresponding rotation of the blade during operation introduces further secondary or tertiary affects in the combustion gas flow field as it flows radially up and over the exposed airfoil tip 30 during operation.
The turbine rotor blade described above may be conventional in configuration and operation for use in a gas turbine engine, including for example the first stage of the HPT. The conventional blade may then be modified as described hereinbelow at the airfoil tip 30 to include first and second squealer tip ribs 36,38 which are radially integral extensions of the airfoil pressure and suction sides, or sidewalls, 20,22, respectively, and conform in profile or curvature therewith.
The first or pressure side rib 36 conforms chordally with the shape or profile of the concave pressure side 20 of the airfoil, and correspondingly, the second or suction side rib 38 conforms in chordal profile with the convex suction side 22 of the airfoil.
The two ribs 36,38 shown in
The airfoil tip further includes one or more cascade baffles or ribs 42 that transversely or circumferentially bridge the first and second ribs 36,38 on opposite sides of the airfoil above the common tip floor 40. The one or more tip baffles 42 partition the airfoil tip chordally or axially into two or more corresponding tip cavities or pockets 44 on opposite forward and aft sides of the corresponding tip baffle.
As initially shown in
The airfoil correspondingly increases rapidly in transverse width W as shown in
At least one of the exemplary tip baffles 42 illustrated in
The first tip baffle 42 is spaced aft from the leading edge along both first and second ribs 36,38 to define a forward tip pocket 44 directly behind the leading edge, and the baffle 42 is disposed obliquely to the leading edge to transversely distribute flow streamlines of the combustion gases 18 in a cascade aft over the baffle toward the trailing edge.
Since the gas pressure on the pressure side of the airfoil is relatively higher than on the suction side of the airfoil, a small portion of the gases will leak circumferentially or transversely over the airfoil tip 30 during operation as shown in
Accordingly, the flow streamlines 18 initially illustrated in
By specifically introducing one or more of the tip baffles 42 to transversely bridge the pressure and suction side squealer ribs 36,38 in the forward portion of the airfoil tip, the incident combustion gas streamlines may be distributed transversely across the baffle in the form of a uniform cascade or waterfall in the downstream direction along the camber line. In this way, the flow streamlines over the airfoil tip may engage the first tip baffle 42 substantially normal thereto.
As indicated above, the velocity and pressure distributions of the combustion gases flowing over the airfoil during operation are highly complex in three dimensions. Further complicating the flow regime is the leakage of the combustion gases over the airfoil tip.
Turbine efficiency is evaluated by the ability of the turbine airfoil to extract energy from the combustion gases. And, turbine efficiency is typically interdependent with combustion gases leakage over the airfoil tip. Tip leakage typically reduces turbine efficiency.
Yet, as further described hereinbelow, the one or more tip baffles 42 specifically introduced into the airfoil tip may substantially increase turbine efficiency with an associated reduction in tip leakage, or with an associated increase in tip leakage depending upon the specific design. In either case, significant improvement in turbine efficiency may be obtained by the introduction of one or more of the cascade tip baffles.
In the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
The several tip baffles 42 have opposite ends which obliquely join the opposite tip ribs 36,38 spaced aft from the leading edge 24 as shown in
Since the forward pocket 44 is disposed directly behind the leading edge where the airfoil diverges in width, the forward pocket itself also diverges in width aft from the leading edge to the first baffle 42.
Correspondingly, the airfoil converges or decreases in width from the hump 48 to the trailing edge 26, and similarly the aft tip pocket 44 disposed directly in front of the trailing edge 26 converges in width from its upstream baffle 42 to the downstream trailing edge 26. And, the two middle pockets 44 have corresponding profiles and perimeters to match the changing profile in the forward hump region of the airfoil.
As shown in FIGS. 1 and 3-5, the two ribs 36,38 provide a full perimeter boundary around the airfoil tip. The one or more tip baffles 42 transversely bridge the two ribs and are coplanar in elevation therewith above the common tip floor 40. Each of the tip pockets 44 is therefore fully enclosed or surrounded by the intersecting ribs and baffles, and is closed along the bottom floor 40 while being fully open and exposed at corresponding outer mouths or inlets directly facing the surrounding turbine shroud.
In this configuration, the transverse tip baffles 42 provide corresponding cascades over which flow the combustion gases in the axially downstream direction over the corresponding tip pockets in sequence or in turn. The tip pockets are disposed in successive flow communication in the downstream direction to transversely distribute the upstream streamlines downstream over the corresponding tip baffles following in parallel flow the camber line of the airfoil tip.
In a preferred embodiment illustrated in
The three tip baffles 42 illustrated in
Advanced CFD analysis has been conducted to evaluate the aerodynamic performance of the first embodiment illustrated in
However, the cascade flow of the combustion gases over the tip baffles introduces additional pressure losses in the tip pockets. Such pressure losses will decrease the gas pressure in the tip-shroud clearance and allow increased leakage of the combustion gases in the circumferential direction in the aft region of the airfoil tip.
Accordingly, the circumferential tip leakage is biased in the aft region of the airfoil tip and minimizes its adverse effect on turbine efficiency. Turbine efficiency may nevertheless be increased by introducing the cascade tip baffles, notwithstanding an associated increase in tip leakage.
However, the exemplary embodiment illustrated in
In this way, the tip leakage associated with the introduction of the cascade tip baffles may be reduced or compensated by the introduction of the pressure side tip flare 52 for further enhancing performance of the airfoil. The flare also significantly increases turbine efficiency.
In the first embodiment illustrated in
The converging aft pocket therefore receives the cascade tip flow from the upstream pockets in turn, and channels the collective flow aft inside the aft pocket. The tip flow then leaks from the aft pocket along the suction side rib 38, with additional circumferential leakage from the airfoil pressure side over the corresponding pressure side rib 36 and then over the second rib 38.
The two baffles 42 are spaced chordally apart between the leading and trailing edges 24,26 to partition the tip into forward, middle, and aft tip pockets 44. The two baffles 42 transverse the opposite ribs 36,38 generally parallel to each other to transversely distribute the flow streamlines in successive cascade flow downstream thereover in turn.
Limiting the number of tip baffles 42 to two, correspondingly limits partitioning of the airfoil tip into only three of the tip pockets 44 which have corresponding perimeter profiles conforming to the local change in curvature along the opposite pressure and suction sides of the airfoil.
The two tip baffles 42 are preferably disposed in the forward portion of the tip including the hump 48 for maximizing their affect on the incoming leakage flow, with the aft tip pocket 44 converging over the narrowing aft portion of the airfoil tip. Preferably, the first tip baffle 42 is disposed forward of the hump 48, with the second or last tip baffle 42 being disposed near or closely aft of the hump 48.
In this embodiment, both baffles 42 are concave forward in profile toward the leading edge 24 where they join the first rib 36, while being convex forward toward the leading edge 24 where they join the second rib 38.
Correspondingly, the two baffles are convex aft towards the trailing edge 26 where they join the first rib 36, and concave aft toward the trailing edge where they join the second rib 38.
In this way, both tip baffles 42 have a generally constant thickness between their opposite forward and aft sides and may integrally join the opposite first and second ribs 36,38 substantially normal thereto.
Furthermore, the pressure side aft ends of the two baffles 42 may be located further aft than their suction side forward ends to conform more normally to the incident combustion gas streamlines as they flow aft over the airfoil leading edge region bridging both the pressure and suction sides of the airfoil in the forward portion thereof.
The embodiment illustrated in
The three-baffle embodiment illustrated in
In contrast, the two-baffle embodiment illustrated in
For example, the single tip baffle 42 is arcuate in transverse profile between the two ribs 36,38, and is preferably concave forward toward the leading edge 24 and convex aft toward the trailing edge 26. The single tip baffle 42 may therefore have a substantially constant thickness between its forward and aft sides which is substantially equal to the corresponding thicknesses of the second rib 38, and the first rib 36 below the integral flare 52.
The single baffle 42 preferably joins the second rib 38 forward of the hump 42, and preferably closely adjacent thereto. And, the baffle 42 joins the first rib 36 aft of the hump or location of maximum tip thickness, and closely adjacent thereto. In this way, the middle of the baffle 42 crosses the hump region of the airfoil obliquely thereto and faces the leading edge 24 substantially normal thereto.
CFD analysis of the
The single serpentine baffle 42 has a generally constant thickness and is concave forward and convex aft where it joins the first rib 36, and is convex forward and concave aft where it joins the second rib 38. The serpentine baffle joins both ribs 36,38 substantially normal thereto, while facing forward toward the leading edge 24 for receiving the incident leakage of the combustion gases over the airfoil tip during operation.
The differences in configuration between the cascade tip embodiments illustrated in
The different embodiments described above share the cascade tip baffles 42 transversely bridging the opposite pressure and suction side tip ribs 36,38 for chordally partitioning the airfoil tip in multiple tip pockets. The number of tip baffles 42 may be varied from one, two, and three or more, as desired to partition the tip into two or more tip pockets.
The transverse shape or profile of the tip baffles may be varied from straight, arcuate, and serpentine, for example, and the baffles may extend obliquely between the opposite ribs at various inclination angles.
The corresponding shape or perimeter profile and size of the individual tip pockets may therefore vary as dictated by the configuration of the tip baffles. And, the specific aerodynamic profile of the airfoil tip transversely between the concave pressure side and convex suction side and axially or chordally between the opposite leading and trailing edges cooperates with the cascade baffles in determining the corresponding configurations of the multiple tip pockets.
The CFD analysis indicated above predicts significant improvement or increase in turbine efficiency attributable to the various forms of cascade baffles described above. However, associated with the efficiency improvement is the corresponding magnitude of tip flow leakage which varies from an increase in leakage to a decrease in leakage depending upon the specific design selected and the particular aerodynamic performance of the turbine airfoil itself.
The basic three-baffle embodiment illustrated in
The single-baffle embodiment illustrated in
Accordingly, the various forms of cascade tip baffles disclosed above in various quantities may be selected for specific turbine blade designs for maximizing efficiency while reducing tip flow leakage as the design constraints dictate. Since the addition of the cascade baffles correspondingly increases blade weight subject to centrifugal forces during operation, those forces and corresponding centrifugal stress may also be used in determining the size and quantity of cascade baffles used for particular designs.
And, effective cooling of the cascade baffles may also affect the specific design selected, with cooling of the baffle typically being provided by cooling apertures (not shown) extending through the tip floor for feeding the several tip pockets with spent cooling air from inside the airfoil.
The exemplary cooling circuit 32 illustrated in
In
Following casting, the open pockets and flow channels may be closed by brazing therein the corresponding pieces of the tip floor at preferably the same depth from the radially outer ends of the common height first and second ribs 36,38 and tip baffles 42.
The various embodiments disclosed above indicate that the simple introduction of even one cascade tip baffle in the forward portion of the airfoil tip can significantly improve turbine efficiency while also reducing tip flow leakage. The specific design of the cascade tip baffle airfoil is sensitive to the highly complex 3D flow distribution over the opposite sides of the airfoil and through the tip-shroud clearance gap. Modern CFD analysis may therefore be used to evaluate variations in the cascade tip design for maximizing turbine efficiency while minimizing tip flow leakage where possible.
While there have been described herein what are considered to be preferred and exemplary embodiments of the present invention, other modifications of the invention shall be apparent to those skilled in the art from the teachings herein, and it is, therefore, desired to be secured in the appended claims all such modifications as fall within the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Accordingly, what is desired to be secured by Letters Patent of the United States is the invention as defined and differentiated in the following claims in which we claim:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3635585 | Metzler | Jan 1972 | A |
3781129 | Aspinwall | Dec 1973 | A |
4010531 | Andersen et al. | Mar 1977 | A |
4142824 | Anderson | Mar 1979 | A |
4390320 | Eiswerth | Jun 1983 | A |
4424001 | North et al. | Jan 1984 | A |
4606701 | McClay et al. | Aug 1986 | A |
4682933 | Wagner | Jul 1987 | A |
4893987 | Lee et al. | Jan 1990 | A |
4940388 | Lilleker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4992025 | Stroud et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5261789 | Butts et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5282721 | Kildea | Feb 1994 | A |
5476364 | Kildea | Dec 1995 | A |
5503527 | Lee et al. | Apr 1996 | A |
5564902 | Tomita | Oct 1996 | A |
5660523 | Lee | Aug 1997 | A |
5720431 | Sellers et al. | Feb 1998 | A |
5738491 | Lee et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5997251 | Lee | Dec 1999 | A |
6027306 | Bunker | Feb 2000 | A |
6039531 | Suenaga et al. | Mar 2000 | A |
6059530 | Lee | May 2000 | A |
6086328 | Lee | Jul 2000 | A |
6164914 | Correia et al. | Dec 2000 | A |
6224336 | Kercher | May 2001 | B1 |
6502303 | Updegrove et al. | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6527514 | Rueloffs | Mar 2003 | B2 |
6554575 | Leeke et al. | Apr 2003 | B2 |
6595749 | Lee et al. | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6672829 | Cherry et al. | Jan 2004 | B1 |
6790005 | Lee et al. | Sep 2004 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
19963375 | Jul 2001 | DE |
1748153 | Jan 2007 | EP |
2155558 | Sep 1985 | GB |
11247612 | Sep 1999 | JP |
2002227606 | Aug 2002 | JP |
Entry |
---|
Mischo, B., “Flow Physics and Profiling of Recessed Blade Tips: Impact on Performance and Heat Load,” ASME GT2006-91074, May 8-11, 2006, pp. 1-11. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/162,433, “Turbine Airfoil with Curved Squealer Tip,” filed Sep. 9, 2005, M.E. Stegemiller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/162,434, “Turbine Airfoil Curved Squealer Tip with Tip Shelf,” filed Sep. 9, 2005, M.E. Stegemiller et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,119, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by K.S. Klasing et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,116, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by K.S. Klasing et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,121, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by K.S. Klasing et al. |
U.S. Appl. No. 11/507,132, filed Aug. 21, 2006, by Ching-Pang Lee et al. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090324422 A1 | Dec 2009 | US |