Power generation systems that provide low cost energy with minimum environmental impact, and that can be readily integrated into the existing power grids or rapidly sited as stand-alone units, can help solve critical power needs in many areas. Combustion engines such as microturbines or reciprocating engines can generate electricity at low cost with efficiencies of 25% to 40% using commonly available fuels such as gasoline, natural gas and diesel fuel. However, atmospheric emissions such as nitrogen oxides (NOx) and particulates can be a problem with reciprocating engines.
One method to generate electricity from the waste heat of a combustion engine without increasing the output of emissions is to apply a bottoming cycle. Bottoming cycles use waste heat from such an engine and convert that thermal energy into electricity. Rankine cycles are often applied as the bottoming cycle for combustion engines. A fundamental organic Rankine cycle consists of a turbogenerator, a preheater/boiler, a condenser, and a liquid pump. Such a cycle can accept waste heat at temperatures somewhat above the boiling point of the organic working fluid chosen, and typically rejects heat to the ambient air or water at a temperature somewhat below the boiling point of the organic working fluid chosen. The choice of working fluid determines the temperature range/thermal efficiency characteristics of the cycle.
Simple ORC Systems using one fluid are efficient and cost effective when transferring low temperature waste heat sources into electrical power, using hardware and working fluids similar to those used in the air conditioning/refrigeration industry. Examples are ORC systems using radial turbines derived from existing centrifugal compressors and working fluids such as refrigerant R245fa.
For higher temperature waste heat streams, the most cost-effective ORC systems still operate at relatively low working fluid temperatures, allowing the continued use of HVAC derived equipment and common refrigerant. However these systems, although very cost-effective, do not take full advantage of the thermodynamic potential of the waste heat stream.
Briefly, in accordance with one aspect of the invention, a pair of organic Rankine cycle (ORC) systems are combined, and a single common heat exchanger is used as both the condenser for the first ORC system and as the evaporator for the second ORC system.
By another aspect of the invention, the refrigerants of the two systems are chosen such that the condensation temperature of the first, higher temperature, system is a useable temperature for boiling the refrigerant of the second, lower temperature, system. In this way, greater efficiencies may be obtained and the waste heat loss to the atmosphere is substantially reduced.
In accordance with another aspect of the invention, the single common heat exchanger is used to both desuperheat and condense the working fluid of the first ORC system.
By another aspect of the invention, if a second heat exchanger is provided in the first ORC system, with the common heat exchanger acting to desuperheat the working fluid of the first ORC system, and the second condenser acting to condense the working fluid in the first ORC system.
By yet another aspect of the invention, a preheater, using waste heat, is provided to preheat the working fluid in the second ORC system prior to its entry into the common heat exchanger.
In the drawings as hereinafter described, preferred and modified embodiments are depicted; however various other modifications and alternate constructions can be made thereto without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention.
Referring now to
In such a typical system, a common working fluid is toluene. In the vapor generator 11 the working fluid has its temperature raised to around 525° F. after which it is passed to the turbine 12. After passing through the turbine 12, the temperature of the vapor drops down to about 300° F. before it is condensed and then pumped back to the evaporator/boiler 11.
Shown in
Referring now to
Typically an unrecuperated microturbine has an exit temperature of its exhaust gases of about 1200° F. This hot gas can be used to boil a high temperature organic fluid such as pentane, toluene or acetone in an ORC. If toluene is the working fluid, the leaving temperature from the vapor generator 17 would be about 500° F., and the temperature of the vapor leaving the turbine 19 and entering the condenser 23 would be about 300° F. After being condensed, the liquid toluene is at a temperature of about 275° F. as it leaves the condenser 23 and passes to the vapor generator 17 by way of the pump 24. These temperatures and related entropies are shown in the TS diagram of
In this cascaded ORC arrangement, the first ORC system (i.e. the toluene loop), is a high temperature system that extracts all the heat, either sensible such as from a hot gas or hot liquid, or latent such as from a condensing fluid such as steam in a refrigerant boiler/evaporator, creating high pressure and high temperature vapor. This high pressure vapor expands through the turbine 19 to a lower pressure with a saturation temperature corresponding to a level where a low cost/low temperature ORC system can be used to efficiently and cost effectively convert the lower temperature waste heat to power. By doing this, the high temperature refrigerant still has positive pressure and a corresponding larger density in the condenser 23. This results in a condenser with less pressure drop, better heat transfer and smaller size, all of which result in a more cost effective ORC system. The high pressure and larger density of the vapor exiting the turbine 19 also allows a smaller turbine design. A substantial reduction in cost can be obtained by these modifications. Further, the lower pressure ratio (i.e. 5:1) at the turbine 19 allows for higher turbine efficiencies.
Considering now that the temperature of the toluene vapor entering the condenser/evaporator 23 is relatively high, its energy can now be used as a heat source for a vapor generator of a second ORC system 25, with the condenser/evaporator 23 acting both as the condenser for the first ORC system 20 and as the evaporator or boiler of the second ORC 25 system. The second ORC system therefore has a turbine 26, a generator 27, a condenser 28 and a pump 29. The organic working fluid for the second ORC must have relatively low boiling and condensation temperatures. Examples of organic working fluids that would be suitable for such a cycle are R245fa or isobutane.
In the second ORC system 25, with R245fa as the organic working fluid, the temperature of the working fluid passing to the turbine 26 would be around 250° F., and that of the vapor passing to the condenser would be about 90° F. After condensation of the vapor, the refrigerant would be pumped to the condenser/evaporator 23 by the pump 29.
Referring to
In this nested arrangement a cost reduction is obtained by adding the low temperature, R245fa, ORC system in such a way that the overall system efficiency is increased. The major irreversibility (thermodynamic loss) of the simple cycle high temperature ORC system is the so-called desuperheat loss in the condenser. Organic fluids leave the turbine more superheated than they enter it. The larger the pressure ratio at the turbine, the stronger this effect. High temperature simple cycle ORC systems, although thermodynamically more efficient than the simple cycle low temperature ORC systems, reject a lot of moderate temperature waste heat that has to be rejected in the desuperheater/condenser. As a result, a relatively large condenser is required. In the nested ORC system, desuperheating is done in the low temperature ORC evaporator 31. This increases the overall power output since this heat was previously rejected to ambient and is now used in a low temperature ORC system to generate power. A further advantage is that the size of the high temperature ORC condenser 32 may be reduced.
Thus, the overall result of the nested ORC system is a more cost effective overall ORC system for high temperature waste heat sources. The increased cost effectiveness is obtained by increased power output and by reducing the size of the original desuperheater/condenser unit.
Although the
A further embodiment of the present invention is shown in
While the present invention has been particularly shown and described with reference to preferred and alternate embodiments as illustrated in the drawings, it will be understood by one skilled in the art that various changes in detail may be effected therein without departing from the true spirit and scope of the invention as defined by the claims.
The United States Government has certain rights in this invention pursuant to Contract No. DE-FC02-00CH11060 between the Department of Energy and United Technologies Corporation.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
---|---|---|---|---|
PCT/US2005/010738 | 3/29/2005 | WO | 00 | 9/13/2007 |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2006/104490 | 10/5/2006 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3234734 | Buss et al. | Feb 1966 | A |
3393515 | Tabor et al. | Jul 1968 | A |
3908381 | Barber et al. | Sep 1975 | A |
4760705 | Yogev et al. | Aug 1988 | A |
4996846 | Bronicki | Mar 1991 | A |
5570579 | Larjola | Nov 1996 | A |
6052997 | Rosenblatt | Apr 2000 | A |
6571548 | Bronicki et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6857268 | Stinger et al. | Feb 2005 | B2 |
6960839 | Zimron et al. | Nov 2005 | B2 |
20050166607 | Brasz et al. | Aug 2005 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
10355782 | Jun 2005 | DE |
903448 | Oct 1945 | FR |
9806791 | Feb 1998 | WO |
2005108749 | Nov 2005 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20080168772 A1 | Jul 2008 | US |