Exemplary embodiments described herein relate generally to a system and method for controlling environmental conditions within a paint booth. More specifically, exemplary embodiments described herein relate to a system and method for controlling temperature and humidity within a paint booth.
Methods used in conditioning air from one state to another state may vary widely depending on such factors as the quality of the air to be conditioned, the temperature and humidity to which the air must be conditioned, the volume of air to be conditioned, and whether a portion of the conditioned air will be outside air or recirculated air. In some applications only the temperature of the air is important whereas in other applications, the humidity of the air is more important.
The painting industry, and particularly the automotive painting industry, is one example where the humidity as well as the temperature of the air must be maintained within an optimal range of conditions. Typically in air supply units (“ASUs”) for applying a base coat, ambient air enters the unit, passes through a pre-heat burner, and then passes through both a humidification media and cooling coils. After traversing the cooling coils, the air passes a reheat burner and is blown into the booth. The use of a reheat burner provides a good method for controlling both the temperature and humidity of the air delivered to the booth. However, typical clear coat ASUs are very poor at controlling humidity. Traditional clear coat ASUs are not equipped with re-heat burners, unlike most base coat ASUs. This lack of a re-heat burner results in poor humidity control year round, especially in the late summer when humidity is high. This is problematic because high humidity in a clear coat paint booth may result in quality and delivery problems. For example, high humidity may result in high voltage kick-outs, drips from buildup, gun spit rejects, solvent pop, and frequent line stops to wipe down the booth.
In clear coat ASUs lacking a re-heat burner, a single closed control loop is generally used. The single closed control loop consists of a burner which adds heat to the airstream, a temperature sensor that reports the booth temperature, and a proportional-integral-derivative (“PID”) controller that makes adjustments to the control signal to track a fixed temperature set point. While this control loop allows for optimal temperature control in the clear coat booth, as the ambient humidity rises, the humidity in the clear coat booth may also rise to levels detrimental to proper clear coat application, thereby affecting productivity. Therefore, it is desirable to overcome the shortcomings of the traditional system and method of controlling only temperature inside a clear coat booth.
Exemplary embodiments of the inventive concept are based upon the recognition that a humidity level above about 75% in a paint booth is detrimental to the application of solvent based paints. Exemplary embodiments described herein provide a system and method for controlling the humidity in a paint booth having an air supply unit without a re-heater during specific atmospheric conditions. Embodiments of the present invention improve the quality of paint delivery by controlling humidity, while also reducing costs as compared to alternative for humidity control techniques.
Generally, embodiments of the present invention provide an air supply unit for forcing air into a paint booth. The air supply unit includes a pre-heat burner for heating air entering the air supply unit. The pre-heat burner is controlled by a temperature PID controller. A temperature sensor is also located in the air supply unit so as to monitor the temperature within the paint booth. The temperature sensor is in communication with the temperature PID controller.
A humidity PID controller is also provided. The humidity PID controller is in electrical communication with at least a humidity sensor positioned within the air supply unit to monitor the humidity within the paint booth. The humidity PID controller is also in electrical communication with the temperature PID controller. When the humidity PID controller detects that humidity in the paint booth is above about 75%, it sends an adjusted temperature set point to the temperature PID controller. The temperature PID controller then increases the output of the pre-heat burner to increase the temperature inside the paint booth in order to decrease the humidity therein. The humidity PID controller continues to send adjusted temperature set points to the temperature PID controller to compensate for the humidity in the paint booth, causing the temperature to be increased and decreased so as to maintain optimal humidity while also providing minimal utility use. Although the humidity PID controller provides the adjusted temperature set points, the temperature PID controller prevents the temperature within the paint booth from rising above 75° F., as this would be detrimental to paint application.
In addition to the features mentioned above, other aspects of the inventive concept will be readily apparent from the following descriptions of the drawings and exemplary embodiments, therein like reference numerals across the several views refer to identical or equivalent features, and wherein:
The present inventive concept will now be described more fully hereinafter with reference to the accompanying drawings, in which some, but not all possible embodiments of the invention are shown. Indeed, these inventions may be embodied in many different forms and should not be construed as limited to the embodiments set forth herein.
The optimal window 4 is defined by a first point 6 located at approximately 65° F. and 65% humidity, a second point 8 located at approximately 65° F. and 75% humidity, a third point 10 located at approximately 75° F. and 65% humidity, and a fourth point 12 located at approximately 75° F. and 75% humidity. The atmospheric window 2 represents the range of ambient air temperatures for which heating may be used to maintain the humidity inside the booth within the optimal window 4 while also maintaining the temperature within the optimal window.
To better understand the present invention, a typical clear coat ASU 20 is illustrated in
The pre-heat burner 26 in the clear coat ASU 20 is controlled by a temperature control loop 40 as shown in
The ineffectiveness of a traditional temperature control loop 40 is illustrated in the simplified psychrometric chart illustrated in
Exemplary embodiments of the inventive concept allow for control over both the humidity and temperature within the paint booth with a clear coat ASU 20 when the ambient air is within the atmospheric window 2. As shown in
To provide both humidity and temperature control inside the clear coat paint booth the humidity PID controller 52 analyzes the humidity data from the outlet humidity sensor 36 to determine the humidity in the paint booth. If the humidity is above the optimal window 4, as detected by the outlet sensor 36, the humidity PID controller 52 transmits a new temperature set point to the temperature PID controller 42, overriding the original temperature set point. The temperature PID controller 42 then directs the pre-heat burner to increase the temperature of the incoming air to decrease the humidity. The humidity PID controller 52 continues to monitor the humidity in the paint booth and continuously sends updated temperature set points to the temperature PID controller 42. Although the humidity PID controller 52 causes an increase in temperature to compensate for the humidity, the temperature PID controller 42 prevents the temperature within the paint booth from exceeding the optimal window 4. As the humidity decreases, the humidity PID controller 52 sends a signal to the temperature PID controller 42 to decrease the heat input of the pre-heat burner 26. By monitoring the humidity and temperature, and allowing the humidity control loop 50 to provide adjusted temperature set points to the temperature control loop 40 only the minimum amount of heat necessary to maintain humidity within the optimal window 4 is used. This improves the overall atmospheric conditions within the paint spray booth while also reducing energy consumption.
While certain embodiments of the invention are described in detail above, the scope of the invention is not considered limited by such disclosure, and modifications are possible without departing from the spirit of the invention as evidenced by the following claims:
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2946943 | Nye et al. | Jul 1960 | A |
3617717 | Smith | Nov 1971 | A |
4173924 | Bradshaw | Nov 1979 | A |
4367787 | Bradshaw | Jan 1983 | A |
4404451 | Niikawa et al. | Sep 1983 | A |
4430698 | Harris | Feb 1984 | A |
4494596 | Bradshaw | Jan 1985 | A |
4542851 | Itou | Sep 1985 | A |
4687686 | Stofleth et al. | Aug 1987 | A |
4729294 | Osawa et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4730553 | Osawa et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4731547 | Alenduff et al. | Mar 1988 | A |
4795088 | Kobayashi et al. | Jan 1989 | A |
4943003 | Shimizu et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4991770 | Bird et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5127574 | Mosser et al. | Jul 1992 | A |
5173118 | Josefsson | Dec 1992 | A |
5213259 | Stouffer | May 1993 | A |
5264014 | Lannefors et al. | Nov 1993 | A |
5270952 | Adams et al. | Dec 1993 | A |
5301101 | MacArthur et al. | Apr 1994 | A |
5346128 | Wacker | Sep 1994 | A |
5408838 | Yaeger et al. | Apr 1995 | A |
5460569 | Josefsson | Oct 1995 | A |
5554416 | Scheufler et al. | Sep 1996 | A |
5573181 | Ahmed | Nov 1996 | A |
5618333 | Buchholz et al. | Apr 1997 | A |
5746650 | Johnson et al. | May 1998 | A |
5819845 | Ryu et al. | Oct 1998 | A |
5915473 | Ganesh et al. | Jun 1999 | A |
5924486 | Ehlers et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6010562 | Flynn et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
6129285 | Schafka | Oct 2000 | A |
6240324 | Preska et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6253113 | Lu | Jun 2001 | B1 |
6264111 | Nicolson et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6269274 | Steinman et al. | Jul 2001 | B1 |
6502629 | Valachovic | Jan 2003 | B2 |
6508303 | Naderer | Jan 2003 | B1 |
6825631 | Nakamura | Nov 2004 | B1 |
6829522 | Filev et al. | Dec 2004 | B1 |
6926079 | Kensok et al. | Aug 2005 | B2 |
7059536 | Schneider et al. | Jun 2006 | B2 |
7155318 | Sharma et al. | Dec 2006 | B2 |
7310572 | Havlena et al. | Dec 2007 | B2 |
7346467 | Bohrer et al. | Mar 2008 | B2 |
7360534 | Krupp | Apr 2008 | B2 |
7389813 | Babikian et al. | Jun 2008 | B2 |
20040215356 | Salsbury et al. | Oct 2004 | A1 |
20070066203 | Melegatti | Mar 2007 | A1 |
20080071395 | Pachner | Mar 2008 | A1 |
20080082312 | Dash et al. | Apr 2008 | A1 |
20080134098 | Hoglund et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080184991 | Krupp | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20080311836 | Bhattacharya | Dec 2008 | A1 |
20090109056 | Tamarkin et al. | Apr 2009 | A1 |
20090130317 | Moore | May 2009 | A1 |
20090210094 | Boder et al. | Aug 2009 | A1 |
20100070093 | Harrod et al. | Mar 2010 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
9-38546 | Feb 1997 | JP |
11-101485 | Apr 1999 | JP |
2000-310440 | Nov 2000 | JP |
2003-50038 | Feb 2003 | JP |
10-2006-0000653 | Jan 2006 | KR |
10-0657431 | Dec 2006 | KR |
Entry |
---|
Honeywell, Specification, UDC 3300 Universal Digital Controller, 1999, 1 page, Industrial Automation and Control, Fort Washington, PA. |
Honeywell, Product Information Note, Profit Controller Multivariable Control and Optimization Technology, Jul. 2007, 3 pages, Automation & Control Solutions, Phoenix, AZ. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20110311929 A1 | Dec 2011 | US |