Patent Application
20140213762
The invention relates to hydrolysates of the milk protein casein, methods of producing the hydrolysates, and uses of the casein hyrolysates as low antigenicity and neutral flavor food ingredients.
Casein hydrolysates are well known food ingredients and are commonly prepared by hydrolyzing a casein substrate, typically sodium caseinate, with a food grade proteolytic/peptideolytic preparation to a degree of hydrolysis of 20% DH or greater. The high degree of hydrolysis employed heretofore is informed by the requirement to produce a casein hydrolysate which exhibits acceptable organoleptic properties while also providing low antigenicity, the latter being a key requirement for casein hydrolysates intended for use as a food ingredient in infant formula, and foodstuffs for immunocompromised or geriatric individuals. A problem with existing casein hydrolysates, especially those that are extensively hydrolysed, is that the resultant hydrolysate either does not have the required reduction of antigenicity, or that the hydrolysate is bitter, or both. A casein hydrolysate having an acceptable bitterness score as well as greatly reduced antigenicity has eluded the food industry for decades.
Whey hydrolysates have different bitterness characteristics compared to casein hydrolysates. For example, whey hydrolysates prepared at a given degree of hydrolysis would tend to have significantly lower bitterness than casein hydrolysates prepared at the same degree of hydrolysis, especially at a degree of hydrolysis of 20% or lower. FlavorPro-Whey™ proteolytic/peptideolytic preparations (Biocatlaysts Inc) are food grade enzyme preparations sold for the production of whey hydrolysates, and for de-bittering of whey-derived milk products.
EP2258208 describes a casein hydrolysate formed by hydrolysis of sodium caseinate using Alcalase™ and employing degrees of hydrolysis (% DH) of from 1 to 20% DH. The hydrolysates formed were found to have greatly reduced antigenicity compared to unhydrolysed casein, but also to have an unacceptably bitter flavor (see comparative example of
It is an object of the invention to overcome at least one of the above-referenced problems for casein hydrolysates.
According to the invention, there is provided a casein hydrolysate formed by controlled hydrolysis of a casein substrate by an aspergillus-derived (fugal) proteolytic preparation. Ideally, the controlled hydrolysis employs a FlavorPro-Whey™ formulation. FlavorPro-Whey™ proteolytic/peptidolytic preparations are food grade proteolytic/peptidolytic formulations sold by the company Biocatalysts Limited of Wales, UK. Hydrolysis of casein, for example a casein salt, at from 5-15% DH has been found to produce hydrolysates that have low antigenicity. Surprisingly, the hydrolysates have also been found to have low bitterness. Compared to the hydrolysates formed according to EP2258208, which employ Alcalase™ for hydrolysis of the casein, the hydrolysates of the invention have been found to have a greatly reduced bitterness score (see
The hydrolysate typically has a relative decrease in antigenicity compared to intact sodium caseinate, preferably of at least 50, 100, 200, 300, 400, 450, 500, 600, 700, or 750 fold. The term “relative decrease in antigenicity” means a reduction in antigenicity as determined using an ELISA protocol employing polyclonal antisera raised in rabbit using the method described below. For example, and referring to
In another embodiment, the hydrolysate typically has a log reduction in antigenicity compared to intact sodium caseinate of at least 1.5, 1.7, 2.5, 2.7, 2.8 or 2.9. The term “log reduction in antigenicity” means the reduction in antigenicity as determined using an ELISA protocol employing polyclonal antisera raised in rabbit using the method described below. For example, and referring to
Preferably, the hydrolysate has a mean bitterness score of less than 30% as determined using the bitterness scoring method described below in which a 100% bitterness score correlates with 1 g/L aqueous caffeine solution and a 0% bitterness score correlates with Ballygowan™ Still Mineral Water. Ideally, the hydrolysate has a mean bitterness score of less than 29%, 28%, 27%, 26%, 25%, 24%, 23%, 22%, 21%, 20%, 19%, or 18%.
Casein hydrolysates of the invention have been found to have reduced antigenicity as well as a low bitterness score. This is surprising as it would have been unexpected that hydrolysis of casein to a % DH of 15% or less would provide a casein hydrolysate having the low levels of antigenicity observed, while also having a neutral flavor (See
The invention also relates to a casein hydrolysate characterized in that it is formed by hydrolysis of a casein substrate, for example a casein salt, at from 5% DH to 15% DH, ideally using a aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation, for example an aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation including aspergillus-derived serine protease activity and an aspergillus-derived calcium-dependent protease, ideally a FlavorPro-Whey™ proteolytic/peptidolytic formulation, and ideally further characterized in that it comprises of peptides spread over the following distribution, as a function of their molecular mass:
The invention also relates to a casein hydrolysate having a peptide profile substantially similar to that shown in
The invention also provides a low molecular weight fraction of a casein hydrolysate of the invention, in which the low molecular weight fraction is substantially free of peptides or proteins having a MW of greater than 7 kDa, 6 kDa, 5 kDa, 4 kDa, or 3 kDa. Preferably, the low molecular weight fraction is substantially free of peptides or proteins having a MW of greater than 7 kDa. More preferably, the low molecular weight fraction is substantially free of peptides or proteins having a MW of greater than 6 kDa. Ideally, the low molecular weight fraction is substantially free of peptides or proteins having a MW of greater than 5 kDa. Surprisingly, it has been found that removal of the mid- and high-MW peptide and protein fraction decreases the antigenicity of the permeate compared to the crude hydrolysate by up to a thousand-fold, while maintaining the low bitterness characteristics of the crude hydrolysate. See for example
Thus, in one embodiment, the invention relates to a low molecular weight fraction of a casein hydrolysate characterized in that it is formed by hydrolysis of a casein substrate, for example a casein salt, at from 5% DH to 15% DH, ideally using an aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation, for example an aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation including an aspergillus-derived serine protease and an aspergillus-derived calcium-dependent protease, ideally a FlavorPro-Whey™ protease formulation, to provide a crude hydrolysate, and then separation of peptides and proteins from the hydrolysate having a MW greater than 7 KD, 6 KD or 5 KD to provide the low molecular weight fraction. Ideally the low molecular weight fraction is further characterized in that it comprises of peptides spread over the following distribution, as a function of their molecular mass:
The invention also relates to a low molecular weight fraction of the casein hydrolysate of the invention having a peptide profile substantially similar to that shown in
The invention also relates to an infant formula in solid (i.e. powder, flakes, particulates) or liquid form comprising a casein hydrolysate, or low molecular weight fraction thereof, of the invention, optionally further including one or more of a carbohydrate source (e.g., lactose), vitamins, minerals, and other food protein hydrolysates. The formulation of infant formula will be well known to those skilled in the art, and is described in EP0631731 and WO2006/130204.
The invention also relates to the use of a casein hydrolysate, or low molecular weight fraction thereof, of the invention in the formulation of a foodstuff for infants, geriatrics, or immunocompromised individuals, or a sports nutritional foodstuff.
The invention also relates to a food ingredient, especially a food ingredient having low antigenicity and non-bitter flavour, comprising a casein hydrolysate, or low molecular weight fraction thereof, of the invention.
The invention also relates to a method for producing a casein hydrolysate, typically a casein hydrolysate of the type having a relative decrease in antigenicity compared to intact sodium caseinate of at least 50, and a mean bitterness score of less than 30%, 25% or 20%, the method comprising the steps of hydrolyzing a casein substrate to a degree of hydrolysis of from 5% DH to 15% DH, ideally of from 9% DH to 15% DH using an aspergillus-derived proteolytic formulation, for example an aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation including aspergillus-derived serine protease and an aspergillus-derived calcium-dependent protease, ideally a FlavorPro-Whey™ proteolytic/peptidolytic formulation.
The invention also relates to a method for producing a low molecular weight fraction of a casein hydrolysate in which the low molecular weight fraction is substantially free of peptides having a MW of greater than 7 kDa, 6 kDa, 5 kDa, 4 kDa, or 3 kDa and typically has a relative decrease in antigenicity compared to intact sodium caseinate of at least 50 fold and a mean bitterness score of less than 30%, the method comprising the steps of hydrolyzing a casein substrate to a degree of hydrolysis of from 5% DH to 15% DH using an aspergillus-derived proteolytic formulation, for example an aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation including an aspergillus-derived serine protease and aspergillus-derived calcium-dependent protease, ideally a FlavorPro-Whey™ protease formulation, and fractionating the hyrolysate using separation means to provide a casein hydrolysate which is substantially free of peptides having a MW of greater than 7 kDa, 6 kDa, 5 kDa, 4 kDa, or 3 kDa, respectively.
The invention also relates to a method for producing a debittered casein hydrolysate, the method comprising the steps of hydrolyzing a casein substrate to a degree of hydrolysis of from 5% DH to 15% DH using a aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation. Suitably, the aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation is a FlavorPro Whey™ proteolytic preparation. Ideally, the casein substrate is hydrolysed to a degree of hydrolysis (% DH) is from 9% DH to 15% DH. The term “debittered” should be understood to have a bitterness score of less than 30%.
% sample residual antigenicity=(1/56.23)×100%=1.7784%≈1.78%
% reduction in sample antigenicity compared to antigenicity of intact NaCN=100%−1.78%=98.22%
i.e. 98.22% of the antigenicity has been removed=1.75 log reduction=56.23 relative decrease;
% sample residual antigenicity=(1/1000000)×100%=0.0001%
% reduction in sample antigenicity compared to antigenicity of intact NaCN=100%−0.0001%=99.9999%
i.e. 99.9999% of the antigenicity has been removed=6 log reduction=1,000,000 relative decrease.
The invention provides a casein hydrolysate, and its use as a food ingredient, typically but not limited to foods such as infant formula, geriatric food products, sports and nutritional foods and supplements, beverages, and food products for immunocompromised individuals. The casein hydrolysate is formed by controlled hydrolysis of a casein substrate (for example, to a degree of hydrolysis of about 5% DH to 15% DH) using a proteolytic/peptideolytic formulation derived from an aspergillus fungus. Ideally, the controlled hydrolysis employs a FlavorPro-Whey™ proteolytic formulation. The molecular weight profile of the peptides in a casein hydrolysate of the invention is shown in
The term “low molecular weight fraction” should be understood as meaning that the hydrolysate is substantially free of peptides having a MW greater than 7 kDa, 6 kDa, and ideally 5 kDa. Generally, it is obtained by separation of a hydrolysate of the invention to remove peptides or proteins have a MW greater than a cut-off value, ie 5 KD, and retaining the permeate. In one embodiment, the low molecular weight fraction is substantially free of peptides having a MW greater than 4 kDa, 3.5 kD and ideally 3 kDa Methods of removing peptide and protein fractions having a MW greater than a specified cut-off value are well known in the art, for example ultrafiltration and dialysis.
The term “substantially free of peptides having a molecular weight of greater than XkDa” should be understood to mean that the hydrolysate contains less than 2% (by weight of total peptide in hydrolysate) of peptides or proteins having a MW greater than XkDa, and ideally less than 1.5% or 1% (w/w) of peptides having a MW of greater than XkDa. In this regard, it should be noted that the hydrolysate of the invention, and fractions thereof, may contain trace amounts of peptides derived from other milk proteins, for example lactoglobulins.
In this specification, the term “controlled hydrolysis” should be understood to mean that the casein substrate is hydrolysed to a degree of hydrolysis of up to 15% (15% DH), preferably up to 14% DH, 13% DH or 12% DH. Ideally, the term should be understood to mean a degree of hydrolysis of at least 5% DH, 6% DH, 7% DH, 8% DH, 9% DH or 10% DH. In one embodiment, the term should be understood to mean a % DH of from 5% DH to 15% DH, 6% DH to 14% DH, 7% DH to 13% DH, or 8% DH to 12% DH.
% DH is measured using the technique described in below.
The term “aspergillus-derived proteolytic preparation” should be understood to mean a protease, or protease formulation, derived from aspergillus fungus, for example aspergillus oryzae. Examples of suitable protease activities include aspergillus-derived serine proteases and aspergillus-derived calcium-dependent proteases. In one embodiment, the proteolytic preparation employs more than one protease, for example at least two, three, four or five proteases. In a preferred embodiment, an aspergillus-derived serine protease and an aspergillus-derived calcium-dependent protease are employed. Ideally, the aspergillus-derived protease comprises a protease preparation of the FLAVORPRO-WHEY™ family, for example FLAVORPRO-WHEY™ 750-P or FLAVORPRO-WHEY™ 192-P.
The casein substrate typically comprises a casein salt, examples of which will be well known to those skilled in the art and include sodium caseinate. In a preferred embodiment, the casein substrate is a milk casein, ideally a bovine milk casein. Typically, the casein substrate (and/or the casein hydrolysate) is substantially free (i.e. less than 5%, 4%, 3%, 2%, 1%, 0.5%, 0.2%, 0.1% (w/w) of other milk proteins, for example whey proteins. The casein substrate employed for the hydrolysis typically has a concentration of 5-15%, 8-12%, and ideally about 9-11% (w/v)
Typically, the ratio of protease to casein substrate (w.w) is from 0.1 to 1.0%, preferably 0.2 to 0.8%, more preferably 0.4 to 0.6%, and ideally at about 0.6%. (0.625-0.658% (w:w)—see generation of hydrolysates section). Typically, the protease employed has an activity of >55 Casein Protease units/gram.
Suitably, hydrolysis of the casein substrate with protease is carried out at a temperature of from 45° C. to 55° C., preferably from 49° C. to 51° C. , and ideally at about 50° C. Typically, hydrolysis of the casein substrate with protease is carried out at a pH of from 5 to 9, suitably at a pH of from 5.5 to 8, preferably at a pH of from 6 to 8, and ideally at a pH of about 7.
In a preferred embodiment, the casein hydrolysate of the invention has a peptide profile substantially similar to that shown in
In a preferred embodiment, the low molecular weight fraction of the casein hydrolysate of the invention has a peptide profile substantially similar to that shown in
Thus, in a preferred embodiment, the invention provides a low molecular weight fraction of a casein hydrolysate fraction formed by hydrolyzing a milk (typically bovine milk) casein substrate to a degree of hydrolysis of 5% DH to 15% DH, 6% DH to 14% DH, 7% DH to 13% DH, or 8% DH to 12% DH, by a mixture of an aspergillus-derived serine protease and an aspergillus-derived calcium dependent protease, preferably a FlavorPro Whey™ protease preparation, in which the hyrolysate is substantially free of peptides having a MW of greater than 5 kDa.
In another embodiment, the invention provides a casein hydrolysate formed by hydrolyzing a casein substrate to a degree of hydrolysis of from 8% DH to 14% DH by a mixture of an aspergillus-derived serine protease and an aspergillus-derived calcium dependent protease, preferably a FlavorPro Whey™ protease preparation, in which the hyrolysate is substantially free of peptides having a MW of greater than 7 kDa, 6 kDa, or ideally 5 kDa.
The invention also relates to a casein hydrolysate of the invention in a dehydrated form, for example a powder. Methods of dehydrating the casein hydrolysate of the invention will be well known to those skilled in the art, and include fluidized bed drying, drum drying and spray drying.
Preferably, the casein hydrolysate of the invention comprises of peptides spread over the following distribution, as a function of their molecular mass:
Preferably, the low molecular weight fraction of the casein hydrolysate of the invention comprises of peptides spread over the following distribution, as a function of their molecular mass:
Sodium caseinate (NaCN, 85.92% w/w protein) was provided by Arrabawn Co-op Society Ltd., Tipperary, Ireland. NaCN solutions (4.8 L) of 9.3% (w/v) were prepared the day before hydrolysis experiments by adding the appropriate quantity of NaCN powder to 4.5 L of distilled water. The protein was allowed to hydrate at 50° C. with gentle stiffing in a sealed reaction vessel using a Heidolph overhead stirrer for 2 to 3 hours before being stored at 4° C. overnight. The following day, these solutions were subdivided into different aliquots for the generation of hydrolysates at different DH values.
Different E:S ratios were used to generate casein hydrolysates having different DH values. An E:S ratio of 0.625% (w:w) was used to generate the FlavorPro Whey 10.76% DH hydrolysate (Table 1).
Upon addition of the commercial proteolytic preparation, the pH of the protein solution was kept constant at pH 7 using a Titrino 718 pH stat. The temperature of the hydrolyzing NaCN solutions was maintained at 50° C. Proteolytic activity was inactivated by bringing the temperature of the hydrolysate samples to 80° C. and maintaining the samples at this temperature for a further 20 mins.
A 300 L solution of 8.85% (w/v) NaCN at pH 7 and 50° C. was prepared by mixing with a Silverson high shear mixer in a sealed water jacketed 300 L tank. FlavorPro Whey (174.70 g) was added to the stirred solution at an enzyme powder:substrate (E:S) ratio of 0.658% (w:w). The solution was incubated for 4 h at 50° C. in the 300 L tank and its pH was maintained at pH 7.0 with the addition of NaOH. The proteolytic activity was inactivated by bringing the temperature of the 300 L solution to 80° C. and maintaining it at that temperature for 20 mins. An aliquot of the hydrolysate was spray dried using a Niro Minor spray dryer. The remaining crude hydrolysate solution was then cooled to 5° C. and stored overnight. The following morning, the solution was reheated to 50° C. and following clarification was ultrafiltered through a membrane having an effective molecular mass cut off of 5 kDa mounted on a DSS MemProc membrane filtration unit. The resulting permeate and retentate were then spray dried using a Niro Minor spray dryer.
Aliquots of the NaCN hydrolysates were diluted to ˜0.09% or 0.05% (w/v) protein with 1% (w/v) SDS and heated for 20 min at 80° C. to fully disperse the hydrolyzed protein. The Degree of hydrolysis (DH, %) of the NaCN hydrolysates was then determined using the TNBS method of Adler-Nissen (1979), as described by Spellman et al., (2003).
This was quantified using a sandwich format casein ELISA protocol employing polyclonal IgG (purified from serum) raised in rabbit against unhydrolyzed sodium caseinate. The purified IgG was coated onto standard medium bind 96 well microtitre plates, and was also conjugated to horse radish peroxidase (HRP) to make the “antibody conjugate”. A calibration curve was constructed using the sodium caseinate used to immunize the rabbits for the calibration standard. The calibration curve range was between 10 and 10,000 ng/m/L which was plotted as 1 to 4 Log ng/mL. Aliquots of the NaCN hydrolysate samples were analysed for residual antigenicity to intact casein using the polyclonal antisera raised in rabbits. Samples were prepared at concentrations of 10, 1, 0.1 and 0.01 mg/mL (7, 6, 5 and 4 Log ng/mL) based on their protein content. Plots of ELISA response (A450/600) versus Log protein concentration were created to determine the relative reduction in residual antigenicity to intact casein (expressed as Log reduction and relative decrease).
Gel permeation HPLC (GP-HPLC) was performed using the Waters HPLC system as essentially described by Spellman et al. (2005). A calibration curve was prepared from the average retention times of standard proteins and peptides (Smyth & FitzGerald, 1998). Molecular Mass Distributions were generated by integrating the GP-HPLC chromatograms using Breeze™ version 3.30 software, using the retention times corresponding to 5000 Da and 10000 Da to divide the chromatogram into 3 sections: 0-5000 Da, 5000-10000 Da and >10000 Da. The integrated area of each section was expressed as a percentage of the integrated area of the entire chromatogram obtained at 214 nm.
Hydrolysate samples, made up in non sparkling mineral water (Ballygowan) at a protein equivalent of 4.5 g/L, were randomly presented in triplicate to a 10-member sensory panel which had been trained to detect and quantify bitterness using caffeine solutions that were also made up in non-sparkling water. Panelists were trained to assign bitterness scores to unknown solutions based on a 0-100% scale, where a 100% bitter solution was taken to have a bitterness value equivalent to 1 g caffeine/L. Non sparkling mineral water was used as the 0 bitterness standard. At each sitting, panelists were presented with solutions of 0.00, 0.25, 0.50, 0.75 and 1.00 g caffeine/l, which had been labeled as 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 and the test hydrolysates. The panelists were first required to taste the 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 solutions in order to familiarise themselves with their taste intensities. They were then required to taste hydrolysates and based on their evaluations of the taste intensities of the 0, 25, 50, 75 and 100 solutions and then rank the taste intensities of the test hydrolysates out of 100. Between tasting each of the bitterness standards and hydrolysates, panelists were asked to eat a piece of non-salted cracker and to rinse their mouths thoroughly with non-sparkling mineral water (Spellman et al. (2005)). Results were expressed as the mean bitterness score±standard error of the mean (SEM).
This was carried out essentially according to Flanagan and FitzGerald (2002). Nitrogen was determined on the supernatants of 4 g 100 g−1 aqueous protein solutions following centrifugation (1620×g; 15 min), using a modification of the macro-Kjeldahl method (IDF, 1993). Kjeldahl catalyst tablets were used instead of potassium and copper sulphate, and the end-point of the titration step was reached at pH 4.6. All nitrogen solubility analyses were carried out induplicate.
The MS and tandem MS experiments were run on a MicrOTOF II mass spectrometer (Bruker Daltonics, Bremen, Germany) equipped with an electrospray ion source, controlled by the MicrOTOF Control software(version 2.3, Bruker Daltonics). The data were acquired over a mass/charge (m/z) range of 300-2500. A full scan MS spectrum was acquired, followed by tandem mass spectra using collision-induced dissociation (CID) of the five most intense precursor ions present in the MS scan. Electrospray conditions were as follows: capillary temperature, 130 C; Capillary voltage, −1500V; Dry Gas flow, 6.0 L min−1. Data analysis software (version 4.0, Bruker Daltonics), BioTool (version 3.1, Bruker Daltonics) and MASCOT (Perkins et al., 1999) were used for data processing and evaluation of peptide sequencing.
Clarity was determined at both room (20° C.) and storage temperature (4° C.) by measuring the absorbance at 660 nm of aqueous hydrolysate solutions using distilled water as blank essentially as described by Sin et al., (2006)
The pH of aliquots of aqueous NaCN hydrolysates (2.0% (w/v) protein equivalent) were adjusted to between 2.0 and 8.0, using 0.1 M and 1 M HCl or NaOH. Samples were then allowed to equilibrate for at least 1 h at room temperature. The pH of the samples was then re-measured and re-adjusted, if necessary, prior to heat stability analysis. Immediately after final pH adjustment, samples (2 ml) were placed in glass tubes (10 mm i.d.—120 mm, AGB Scientific, Dublin, Ireland), sealed with silicone bungs, immersed in an oil bath thermostatically controlled at 140° C. (Elbanton BV, Kerkdriel, The Netherlands), with continuous rocking at motor speed setting 3. The heat coagulation time (HCT) was taken as the length of time in min that elapsed between placing the sample in the oil bath and the onset of coagulation (Ryan et al., 2004). These analyses were performed in triplicate.
The invention is not limited to the embodiment hereinbefore described in detail which may be varied in construction, detail and process step without departing from the spirit of the invention.
Adler-Nissen J (1979). Determination of the degree of hydrolysis of food protein hydrolysates by trinitrobenzenesulfonic acid. Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 27: 1256-1262
Flanagan, J. and FitzGerald, R. J. (2002). Physicochemical and nitrogen solubility properties of Bacillus proteinase hydrolysates of sodium caseinate incubated with transglutaminase pre- and post-hydrolysis. J. Agric. Food Chem. 50(19): 5429-5436.
IDF. (1993). Block Digestion (Macro) Method. International Standard 20B, Part 2. Brussels, Belgium: International Dairy Federation
Perkins, D. N., Creasey, D. M. and Cottrell, J. S. (1999). Probability-based protein identification by searching sequence databases using mass spectrometry data. Electrophoresis, 20, 3551-3567.
Ryan, M., McEvoy, E., Duignan, S., Crowley, C., Fenelon, M. O'Callaghan, D. M. and FitzGerald, R. J. (2008). Thermal stability of soy protein isolate and hydrolysate ingredients. Food Chem. 108:503-510.
Sin, H. N., Yusof, S., Hamid, N. Sheikh Abdul and Rahman, R. Abd. (2006). Optimization of enzymatic clarification of sapodilla juice using response surface methodology. Journal of Food Engineering 73: 313-319.
Smyth M & FitzGerald R. J. 1998. Relationship between some characteristics of WPC hydrolysates and the enzyme complement in commercially available proteinase preparations. Int. Dairy Journal 8: 819-827
Spellman, D. O'Cuinn, G. and FitzGerald, R. J. (2005) Physicochemical and sensory characteristics of whey protein hydrolysates generated at different total solids levels. J. Dairy Res. 72: 138-143.
Spellman D, McEvoy E, O'Cuinn G & FitzGerald, R. J. (2003). Proteinase and exopeptidase hydrolysis of whey protein: Comparison of the TNBS, OPA and pH stat methods for the quantification of degree of hydrolysis. International Dairy Journal 13: 447-453
| Number | Date | Country | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 11154760.0 | Feb 2011 | EP | regional |
| Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind | 371c Date |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| PCT/EP12/52809 | 2/17/2012 | WO | 00 | 3/21/2014 |
