Not Applicable.
Not Applicable.
The present invention relates to a keeper for a casement window assembly. More specifically, the present invention relates to a keeper having a unique structure that improves the overall strength and rigidity of the keeper.
Casement window assemblies are well-known within the window industry. Generally, the casement window assembly includes a rectangular frame assembly and a window assembly. The frame assembly supports the window assembly when the window assembly is in either a closed position or an open position. The window assembly includes a glass pane supported by a plurality of frame members. The frame assembly includes a plurality of frame members and a lock assembly. The lock assembly includes a keeper and related hardware, including a pin, a handle, and a rotary device. The keeper is generally mounted to one of the frame members of the window assembly. Typically, the pin is affixed to an interior portion of one frame member and coupled to the handle. The pin engages the keeper when the window assembly is in the closed or nearly-closed position. The rotary device permits a user to move the window assembly between opened and closed positions.
In conventional window assemblies, the keeper is cooperatively positioned with the pin such that the keeper receives the pin when the user actuates the handle. Prior to actuating the handle, the user rotates the rotary device to move the window assembly from the open position to the closed position. Similarly, the keeper disengages the pin when the user actuates the handle and rotates the handle to move the window assembly from the closed position to the open position. The engagement between the keeper and the pin is essential to secure the window assembly in the closed position.
In the window industry, a number of tests are utilized to evaluate the strength of the casement window assembly, including the keeper. One such test evaluates the strength of the keeper by applying a progressive amount of force to the keeper until it fails. A keeper fails the test when it deforms such that it can no longer engage the pin and, as a result, no longer secure the window assembly. Conventional keepers can withstand approximately 250 pounds of force or loading.
In another type of test, commonly referred to as an impact/cycle test, a projectile impacts the window assembly in two spots. The window assembly is then pressure-cycled to ensure that it does not open in a simulated hurricane. To meet this strength standard, manufacturers of casement window assemblies typically utilize a plurality of conventional keepers, often more than three sets of keepers and pins per casement window assembly. This significantly increases the cost of the window hardware and as a result, the cost of the casement window assembly.
Consequently, there is a need for a keeper having increased strength such that less hardware is necessary for the casement window assembly to meet the industry standards for strength. The present invention is provided to solve these and other deficiencies.
The present invention relates to a keeper for use in a casement window assembly, which includes a frame assembly and a window assembly. The window assembly includes a glass pane supported by a plurality of frame members. The keeper is mounted to one of the frame members of the window assembly. The frame assembly includes a plurality of frame members. The frame assembly includes a rotary device adapted to move the window assembly between an open position and a closed position. The casement window assembly further has a lock assembly. The lock assembly includes the keeper, a pin, and a retainer. The pin extends from a lock bar, which is slidably mounted by the retainer to an interior portion of one frame member. The pin is adapted to engage the keeper when the window assembly is in the closed or nearly-closed position.
The keeper has a first portion, a second portion, an intermediate portion, and a slot or recess. The first portion of the keeper has a first aperture and a second aperture, wherein each aperture is adapted to receive a fastener to secure the keeper to the window frame member. The first portion has a rounded upper segment, an intermediate segment, and a rounded lower segment. Also, the first portion has a mounting surface that contacts a portion of the window frame member when the keeper is affixed to the frame member.
The second portion of the keeper has an elongated finger extending from an upper segment of the second portion. The finger is adapted to slidingly engage a portion of the pin when the window assembly is moved from the closed position to the open position, or from the open position to the closed position. The second portion has an interior edge that abuts the intermediate portion. The keeper is preferably configured such that the second portion is oriented generally perpendicular to the first portion.
The intermediate portion of the keeper is positioned between the interior edge of the first portion and the interior edge of the second portion. Unlike conventional devices, a rib extends from an upper segment of the intermediate portion. The rib is an elongated structure that increases the structural integrity or strength of the keeper. The rib is positioned adjacent to the interior edge of the first portion. In addition, the rib is generally aligned with the intermediate segment of the first portion. When viewed in cross-section, the contact between the rib and the first portion defines an “L-shaped” structure. The rib has a sloped or tapered configuration, meaning that its top and bottom segments do not share the same geometry. The keeper is preferably configured such that the intermediate portion is oriented generally perpendicular to the first portion.
The slot is generally positioned between the finger of the second portion and the rib of the intermediate portion. The slot is adapted to slidingly engage a portion of the pin when the window assembly is moved from the closed position to the open position, or from the open position to the closed position. The slot has a pair of interior edges and an apex portion.
Conventional keeper designs lack the rib of the present invention. Since the rib is positioned along or makes contact with an extent of the first portion, the rib dramatically increases the strength of the keeper. In addition, the rib alters the configuration of the keeper.
Other features and advantages of the invention will be apparent from the following specification taken in conjunction with the following drawings.
While this invention is susceptible of embodiment in many different forms, there is shown in the drawings and will herein be described in detail preferred embodiments of the invention with the understanding that the present disclosure is to be considered as an exemplification of the principles of the invention and is not intended to limit the broad aspect of the invention to the embodiments illustrated.
The frame assembly 14 includes atop horizontal frame member 27, a bottom horizontal frame member or sill 28, a left vertical frame member or left jamb 29, and a right vertical frame member or right jamb 30. The frame assembly 14 further includes a rotary device or actuator 32 with a handle 34 extending from a base 36. The rotary device 32 also includes a pair of links 37 coupled to the handle 34. The rotary device 32 is adapted to move the window assembly 16 in the frame assembly 14 between an open position and a closed position.
Referring to
Referring to
As shown in
The second portion 56 of the keeper 18 has an elongated finger 72 extending from an upper segment 74 of the second portion 56. The finger 72 has a tip segment 76, a nose segment 78, and an exterior edge 80. The finger 72 is adapted to slidingly engage a portion of the pin 38 when the window assembly 16 is moved from the closed position to the open position, or from the open position to the closed position. The second portion 56 has an interior edge 82 that abuts the intermediate portion 58. Preferably, the length of the second portion 56 is greater than the length of the first portion 54 and the intermediate portion 58 (see FIG. 4). The keeper 18 is preferably configured such that the second portion 56 is oriented generally perpendicular to the first portion 54.
The intermediate portion 58 is positioned between the interior edge 68 of the first portion 54 and the interior edge 82 of the second portion 56. The intermediate portion 58 has an upper segment 84. Unlike conventional devices, a rib 86 extends from the upper segment 84. The rib 86 is an elongated structure that increases the structural integrity or strength of the keeper 18. Referring to
The slot 59 is generally positioned between the finger 72 of the second portion 56 and the rib 86 of the intermediate portion 58. In other words, the configuration of the slot 59 is generally defined by the finger 72 and the rib 86. The slot 59 is adapted to slidingly engage a portion of the pin 38 when the window assembly 16 is moved from the closed position to the open position, or from the open position to the closed position. Described in different terms, the slot 59 is adapted to receive a portion of the pin 38 when the window assembly 16 is moved from the closed position to the open position, or from the open position to the closed position. The slot 59 has a first interior surface 92 corresponding to, or defined by the finger 72. The slot 59 also has a second interior surface 96 corresponding to, or defined by the rib 86. Due to the presence of the rib 86, the first interior surface 92 is generally opposed to the second interior surface 96. Described in a different manner, the first interior surface 92 is generally opposed to the second interior surface 96. An apex or top portion 94 of the slot 59 is defined by the combination of the rib 86, the intermediate portion 58, and the finger 56. The apex portion 94 has an apex surface 95 (see FIG. 4). The apex surface 95 is sloped or swaged to increase the strength of the keeper 18 through a variety of methods, including but not limited to work hardening. Although the apex portion 94 is shown as having a generally curvilinear configuration, it can have a generally linear configuration. The slot 59 has a “U-shaped” configuration, however, the precise configuration can vary with the design of the keeper 18 and the pin 38.
It is understood that the intermediate portion 58 can be considered to be integral with or a part of the second portion 56. As a result, the second portion 56 extends generally perpendicular from the interior edge 68 of the first portion 54 and wherein the rib 86 is adjacent the first portion 54. In this manner, the slot 59 is positioned within the second portion 56 and the slot 59 is generally defined by the rib 86 and the finger 72 of the second portion 56.
Referring to
Conventional keeper designs lack the rib 86 of the present invention. Although most conventional designs include a slot to receive a pin, the interior edge of the slot is omitted such that the slot makes direct contact with the first portion. As a result, the first portion defines the configuration of the slot—namely an interior edge of the slot. In contrast, the rib 86 makes contact with an extent of the first portion 54 and defines the interior edge 96 of the slot 59. Thus, the rib 86 dramatically alters the configuration of the keeper 18. In addition, a multitude of conventional keepers feature a relief, meaning a portion of material from the first portion is removed from the keeper. The relief is intended to increase the strength of the conventional keeper. The keeper 18 of the present invention does not require this feature, since the rib 86 increases the strength of the keeper 18. In addition, forming the relief increases the manufacturing costs of the conventional keeper.
As explained above, the rib 86 is adapted to increase the structural integrity or strength of the keeper 18. Applying industry-wide testing, this means the keeper 18 can be subjected to a greater amount of force than conventional devices before deforming and/or reaching a failure point. During testing, this force is typically applied to a region of the second portion 56 in a direction substantially perpendicular to the first portion 54 tending to force the second portion 56 away from the first portion 54. The rib 86 increases the rigidity of the keeper 18 thereby increasing the overall strength of the keeper 18. In a preferred embodiment, the keeper 18 of the present invention can withstand over 500 pounds of force loading before failure, whereas conventional keepers fail at approximately 250 pounds of force loading. As a result and compared to conventional designs, a lesser number of keepers 18 for a casement window assembly 10 are required to meet the industry standards used to evaluate the overall strength of the casement window assembly 10. This increases the utility and value of the keeper 18 and reduces the overall hardware costs of the casement window assembly 10.
The keeper 18 can be fabricated from a variety of materials, including metal. For example in a preferred embodiment, the keeper 18 can be fabricated from 304 stainless steel. The remaining components of the casement window assembly 10, such as the pin 38, the lock bar 40, and the link 50 can be formed from a number of materials. The length of the keeper 18 can vary between 1.0-4.0 inches depending upon the design parameters of the keeper 18 and the casement window assembly 10.
While the specific embodiments have been illustrated and described, numerous modifications come to mind without significantly departing from the spirit of the invention and the scope of protection is only limited by the scope of the accompanying Claims.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3706467 | Martin | Dec 1972 | A |
3747272 | Martin | Jul 1973 | A |
3811718 | Bates | May 1974 | A |
3949525 | Bates et al. | Apr 1976 | A |
4241541 | Van Klompenburg et al. | Dec 1980 | A |
4253276 | Peterson et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4346372 | Sandberg | Aug 1982 | A |
4860493 | Lense | Aug 1989 | A |
4907832 | Pemberton | Mar 1990 | A |
4937976 | Tucker et al. | Jul 1990 | A |
4973091 | Paulson et al. | Nov 1990 | A |
4991886 | Nolte et al. | Feb 1991 | A |
5045265 | Pettit | Sep 1991 | A |
5087087 | Vetter et al. | Feb 1992 | A |
5103533 | Pettit et al. | Apr 1992 | A |
5118145 | Tucker | Jun 1992 | A |
5152103 | Tucker et al. | Oct 1992 | A |
D347569 | Vetter et al. | Jun 1994 | S |
5414899 | Raetz | May 1995 | A |
5531045 | Piltingsrud | Jul 1996 | A |
5568702 | Frank et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5568703 | Frank et al. | Oct 1996 | A |
5581941 | Sill et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
5581942 | Sill et al. | Dec 1996 | A |
RE35463 | Vetter et al. | Feb 1997 | E |
5603538 | Evers | Feb 1997 | A |
5615522 | Tomanek | Apr 1997 | A |
5741031 | Bauman et al. | Apr 1998 | A |
5813171 | Piltingsrud | Sep 1998 | A |
5813710 | Anderson | Sep 1998 | A |
5927767 | Smith et al. | Jul 1999 | A |
6139070 | Piltingsrud | Oct 2000 | A |
6367853 | Briggs | Apr 2002 | B1 |
6651389 | Minter et al. | Nov 2003 | B2 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20040144033 A1 | Jul 2004 | US |