This application is a national stage filing under 35 U.S.C. § 371 of international application PCT/CA2018/050661, filed Jun. 1, 2018 and titled “Casing Expander for Well Abandonment,” the disclosure of which is hereby incorporated herein by reference in its entirety.
The current disclosure is directed to a tool and system for implementing abandonment procedures for cemented wellbores.
Wells access subterranean hydrocarbon formations for the recovery of oil and gas. Once the well is exhausted or other failures, procedures are in place to abandon the well while protecting other resources including the prevention of the contamination of potable water sources and preclusion of surface leakage. Abandonment procedures have been developed in the oil and gas industry including steps to prevent underground inter-zonal communication and fluid migration up the well and into shallow drinking water aquifers or to surface.
The Alberta Energy Regulator, Alberta Canada, currently requires that a “bridge plug” be installed in the well, ostensibly above any source of fluids, as the first step in well abandonment. The bridge plug comprises a mechanical tool having a body carrying slips and an expandable, elastomeric seal ring. The tool can be operated by a tubing string extending down from ground surface. The slips are expanded to engage the casing and secure the tool in place. The seal ring is expanded to seal against the casing's inner surface. The body and seal ring thereby combine to close and seal the cased bore.
During the conventional abandonment procedure the bridge plug is positioned and set at a pre-determined depth in the casing bore. A hydraulic pressure test is then carried out to determine if the bridge plug and well casing are competent to hold pressure. The pressure test is currently performed by filling the casing bore with water and applying pressure at 1000 psi for 10 minutes. After it has been determined that both the bridge plug and the casing above the bridge plug are competent, a column of cement (typically 40 feet in length) is deposited in the bore immediately above the bridge plug. Finally, the top end of the steel casing is cut off at a point below ground level and a vented cap is welded on the upper end of the casing.
However, problems can commonly arise over time with this system for plugging and abandoning wells. For example, the elastomeric element of the bridge plug may develop surface cracks or otherwise deteriorate and allow fluid to leak past it. Minute or micro-annular cracks may also develop about the cement column where the cement abuts the inside surface of the casing. Further, the cement sheath in the annulus, around the outside of the casing, can shrink and develop fracture. One or more of these defects can result in natural gas or other fluid leaking either up through the cased bore or along the outside surface of the casing. Such leakage indicates that the abandonment process has failed. This failure is commonly identified when vegetation surrounding the well at ground surface begins to die. Further remediation is required once the location of the leak along the well is determined.
Prior detection of the location of leaks, using logging systems, has been expensive and circumstantial, measuring parameters of the cased wellbore that are indicative of the potential for a leak, but not determinative. Logging systems in use include acoustic, video, caliper, neutron, gamma and the like. Often the tools are used on combination. Logs are sometimes run under pressure to heighten resolution in some circumstances. Accordingly the current logging systems result in diagnostic costs in the order of 25 to 75 thousand dollars.
More currently, as set forth in Applicant's PCT Patent Application PCT/CA2017/050596, entitled DIAGNOSTIC TOOL FOR WELL ABANDONMENT TOOL, published as WO 2017/197517 on Nov. 23, 2017 a tool is provided for diagnosing a downhole source of a surface casing vent flow (SCVF), the tool being rapidly relocatable along the well for temporary restriction annular leaks. The tool has a stack of pleated rings slidably mounted on a tubular mandrel. One end of the stack is set to engage with the casing and the stack is compressed axially to expand the pleated rings expand the casing for diminishing casing/cement micro-annular cracks. The rings are dimensioned for insertion in the casing bore and yet when compressed are operative to expand radially sufficiently to press against the casing wall and provide a circumferential frictional interlock or engagement with the casing. When surface casing vent flow is reduced, the downhole source is thereby identified for remediation and, if not reduced, the tool is released, traversed uphole and actuated again.
Presently there are tens of thousands of wells in Alberta, Canada that have been abandoned. However, many have been identified as leaking fluid to ground surface. An operator, having identified a leak is still in need of a means to economically plug a leak or leaks for proper abandonment plug procedures under the regulations.
If plug procedures are not successful, remedial work is required and retesting completed for packer isolation, all of which adds significantly to well abandonment costs.
Basically two techniques have been used for expandable casing, typically for coupling casing at a liner hanger: swaging and a roller tool, both of which are tools that are dragged axially along the casing, a swage tool being tapered and having a largest diameter that this greater than that of the casing inner diameter. The roller also has a diameter greater than that of the casing inner diameter, but using multiple rollers, typically three or four rollers, providing variable expansion into the casing about the circumference. Both require actuation over a greater axial extent than the target location. Further, the success of both is dependent on the uniformity of the casing, the force applied, lubricants, variability in expansion.
Applicant hereby provides casing expansion element for actuation and remediation of well surface casing at a target location for a well suffering from annular cement integrity deficiencies. The tool imparts a radially outward and expansive plastic deformation to the casing at a point location, typically above a leak source. Applicant notes that others have determined that, surprisingly, micro-annular channeling and fractures healed after compression. Once one has determined a target location of the well casing is located that is at or above a source of a surface casing leak, the casing can be expanded at that location, permanently and with a diametral magnitude to remediate leaking thereby. In one embodiment, a specialized form of one-time use pleated ring tool is provided to convert axial displacement into radial displacement. In another embodiment, an elastomeric element is provided which is capable of multiple uses. As the casing expanding causes plastic deformation, the expanded casing retaining its expanded dimensions, the expansion element need not be left in the well.
A conveyance string, including a wireline or tubing conveyed running tool, incorporating a linear or axial actuator, is also disclosed for providing the axial displacement. The force needed to effect radial expansion to expand the casing is significant. At depth in wells, the most convenient approach is to implement an actuator that applies axial forces, and then convert the axial force to radial forces. The running tool is modular, having additive axial force modules that can be stacked for increasing axial force delivery.
Accordingly, in one embodiment, a single use casing expansion element is conveyed downhole and actuated at the target location. In another embodiment a multiple use, resettable expansions tool is provided.
In one broad aspect, a downhole tool is conveyable downhole along the axis of a well casing and comprising a setting tool having an axial actuator and an expansion element having a first diameter for conveyance along the casing. The expansion element is compressible axially by the axial actuator for expanding radially to a second diameter for plastic deformation of the casing.
In one embodiment the expansion element is a single use stack of pleated rings which can be expanded and abandoned downhole. In another embodiment, the expansion element is an elastomeric element which can be expanded, contracted and moved along the casing.
In another broad aspect, a method for in-situ expansion of well casing comprises conveying an expansion element downhole on a conveyance string to a specified location along the casing. The element is expanded radially outwards to plastically expand the casing at the specified location; and thereafter the expansion element is released. In an embodiment, after releasing the expansion element, the expansions element is conveyed along the casing to a successive specified location for repeating the actuating and element-releasing steps.
In other embodiments, element is single use and the releasing of the expansion element is to release the element from the conveyance string for abandonment in the casing and in others, the element is multi-use and the releasing of the expansion element comprises contracting the element radially inwards from the expanded casing. In the single use case, the expanding of the element radially may be irreversible. In the multi-use case the expanding of the element radially is reversible.
In another aspect, the method is applied to remediation of a well having a cement sheath thereabout, the actuating of the element to plastically expand the casing at the specified location further comprises compressing the cement sheath to compact the cement. The method can be applied to successive joints of casing.
In another aspect, the method is applied remediation of an abandoned well completed with casing and having a cemented sheath thereabout at least a portion thereof, the well exhibiting surface casing vent flow originating at or below a specific location.
With reference to
In the context of well remediate for well abandonment, a running and setting tool 20 is provided for running the expansion element 10 downhole to the target location 13 and actuation thereof for plastically expanding the casing 12, such as for remediation of surface casing vent flow issues. The casing 12 is expanded into the cement sheath 14 surrounding the casing 12. The cement sheath 14 is compressed at the point of expansion. Permanent deformation of the casing 12 maintains contact of the expanded casing 12 with the compressed, volume-reduced cement sheath 14.
Applicant notes that others have determined that, surprisingly, integrity issues of the cement sheath 14, including micro-annular channeling and fractures, do heal after having experienced significant compression. Once one has determined a location 13 of the well casing 12 that is at or above a source of a surface casing leak, the casing is expanded permanently, and with a diametral magnitude to remediate leaking thereby. As set forth in IADC/SPE SPE-168056-MS, entitled “Experimental Assessment of Casing Expansion as a Solution to Microannular Gas Migration, it was determined that expanding casing through a swaging technique, applied generally along a casing, compresses the cement, and though the cements consistency changes it does regain its solid structure and compressive strength.
In the embodiment disclosed herein, the expansion element 10 is a material or metamaterial which accepts an axially compressive actuation force resulting in radial expansion. More commonly known as Poisson's Ratio as applied to homogeneous materials, it is also a convenient term for the behavior of composite or manufactured materials. Sometimes such manufactured materials are referred to as meta-materials, usually on a small material properties scale, but also applied here in the context of an assembly of materials that are intractable a in homogenous form, e.g. a block of steel, but are more pliable in less dense manufactured forms.
The expansion element is conveyed down the well casing 12 by the setting tool 20, on tubing or wireline 22 (as shown) to the specified location 13 for remediation. The setting tool 20 imparts significant axial actuating forces to the expansion element for a generating a corresponding radial expansion. The force of the radial expansion causes plastic deformation of the casing 12 at the specified location 13.
The setting tool 20 comprises an actuating sub 24, one or more piston modules 26,26 . . . , a top adapter sub 28, and a power unit 30.
The setting tool 20 has an uphole end 32 for connection with the wireline 22 typically incorporated with the power unit. The expansion element is operatively connected at one end or the other of the setting tool. In an embodiment, the expansion element 10 is supported at a downhole end 34, at the actuating sub 24, and thereby separates a conveyance end from the expansion element end.
When the setting tool is equipped with an expansion element 10 for single use, such as the stack of pleated rings described below, is configured with the expansion element 10 at the downhole end 34, permitting release and abandonment of the expansion element downhole and subsequent recovery of the setting tool 20 by pulling-out-of-hole thereabove. An expansion element 10 capable of multi-use could be located at either end, but is practically located again at the downhole end 34 as illustrated for separation again of conveyance and expansion functions, or for emergency release of the more risky expansion element.
Pleated Expander
With reference to
This embodiment of the expandable element 10 is a stack 40 of pleated rings 42 slidably mounted on a mandrel 44. Each ring 42 is separated and spaced axially apart from an adjacent ring 42 by a flat, annular washer 46. The behavior of pleated rings 42 for sealing a wellbore within the well casing 12 is also described in Applicant's international application PCT/CA2016/051429 filed Monday, Dec. 5, 2106 and claiming priority of CA 2,913,933 filed Dec. 4, 2015.
As shown in
With reference to
As shown in
The overall axial height of the stack of pleated rings is limited to concentrate the radial force and hoop stress into the short height of the casing 12. The radial force displaces the casing beyond its elastic limit and imparts plastic deformation over a concentrated, affected casing length for a given axial force. The magnitude of the plastic expansion can be controlled by the magnitude of the axial force.
As shown in
In a first example, Example 1, a test expansion element 10 was prepared and comprised a stack of five double-pleated rings 42 separated and isolated by six flat spacer washers 46 for a stack height of about 4.6″ to 5.1″. The stack height controls the amount of diametrical expansion. The greater the pleat height, the greater the casing expansion. Each ring 42 was a 0.042″ thick, fully hardened stainless steel. Between each pleated ring 42 was a strong 0.1875″ thick washer 46 of QT1 steel having a 4.887 OD and a 3.017 ID. A 3″ diameter test mandrel 44 was provided.
In testing, compression of the stack reduced the stack height by about 1.0″ to 1.5″ for the 3/16″ thru ⅞″ expansion respectively. For 5.5″, 14 lb./ft J55 casing, having 5.012 ID, a nominal 5.5″ OD and a 4.887 drift size. The initial dimensions are 4.887 OD with a 3.017″ ID. The flattened ID and OD width varies with the initial pleat height.
At 90 tons (180,000 lbs force) of axial load to flatten the pleats, the OD of a pleated ring 42, having an initial 0.280″ pleat height, expanded in diameter from 4.887″ OD to 5.280″ OD and the ID expanded from 3.017″ to 3.410″ ID. This resulted in about a 3/16″ casing expansion.
For a ring having a 0.380″ pleat height, when flattened, expanded in diameter from 4.887″ OD to 5.655″ OD and the ID expanded from 3.017″ to −3.785 ID. This resulted in a ⅞″ casing expansion. Applicant believes that the measurements scale proportionately up and down from 4″ to 9⅜″ casing.
In other embodiments Applicant may use a semi-solid viscous fluid embedded in the assembled stack 40 to add greater homogeneity thereto. When flattened, the individual pleats impose a plurality of point hoop loads on the casing. Applicant determined that a more distributed load can result with the addition of the viscous fluid or sealant 56 located in the interstices of the stack 40.
A suitable sealant 56 is a hot molten asphaltic sealant that becomes semi-solid when cooled. The stack of pleated rings 42 can be dipped in hot sealant and cooled for transport downhole embedded in the stack between the rings 42 and the washers 46 and within the valleys of the pleated rings 42 themselves. Plastomers are used to improve the high temperature properties of modified asphaltic materials. Low density polyethylene (LDPE) and ethylene vinyl acetate (EVA) are examples of plastomers used in asphalt modification. The sealant can be a molten thermo-settable asphaltic liquid, typically heated to a temperature of about 200° C. Such as sealant is a polymer-modified asphalt available from Husky Energy™ under the designation PG70-28. The described sealant melts at about 60° C. and solidifies at about 35° C.
The semi-solid sealant 56 in the stack of pleated rings, when actuated to the compressed position, seals or fluid exit is at least restricted from between adjacent washers, the mandrel, the adjacent pleated rings and the casing, for further applying fluid pressure to the wall of the casing 12.
Expansion elements 10 assembled from metal tend to be irreversible; once expanded they remain expanded, and as a result tend to become integrated with the casing 12 and thus cannot be reused.
Applicant is aware of abandoned wells that has multiple sources of vent leakage and it is advantageous to be able to expand the casing 12 at multiple locations 13,13 without having to trip out of the well casing 12 to install a new expandable element 10.
Elastomeric
Accordingly, and with reference to
An elastomeric cylindrical bushing 60 has a central bore 62 along its axis and is mounted on the mandrel 44 passing therethrough. A suitable elastomeric material is a nitrile rubber, 75 durometer. A bottom of the bushing 60 is supported axially by a downhole stop 54 at a bottom the mandrel 44. A support washer 46, similar to the washers 46 used in the stack 40 of pleated rings.
The actuator sub 26 is fit with an uphole stop 52. When actuated, the bushing 60 is compressed relative to the bottom stop 52, so as to cause the bushing to expand radially related to its Poisson's ratio, engaging the casing 12. As the bushing is axially restrained and compressed, dimensional change is directed into a radial engagement with, and a plastic displacement, of the casing. Again, total axial height of the bushing is limited to concentrate force and maximize hoop stress in the casing 12 for a given axial force.
Generally, the diameter of the mandrel 44 is sized to about 50% to 75% of the outside diameter of the bushing 60. The inside diameter of the bushing 60 is closely size to that of the mandrel 44. For example, for 5.5″ 14 lb/ft casing, the bushing height is 5″ tall, the OD is 4.887″ and the mandrel OD and bushing ID can be 2.125″. Rather than changing out the mandrel for different sized elements 10, one can sleeve the mandrel for larger elements. Not shown, the mandrel 44 can also be fit with sleeve for varying the OD to fit the ID of larger bushings. For 9⅝″ 40 lb/ft casing, having a bushing OD of 8.765″, a 2.125″ mandrel provided with a setting tool for 5.5″ casing, can be sleeved to about 4″ OD for the larger busing 60.
The elastomeric expansion element 10 has been tested with both 5.5″ and 7″ casing configurations. In both instances the element 10 has been about 5″ tall which creates a bulge or plastic deformation along the wall of the casing 12 of about 3″, consistent with the 5″ tall pleated ring system.
In both sizes, the lighter weight casing 7″, 17 lb/ft J55 and 5.5″, 14 lb/ft J55 having wall thicknesses of about 0.25″) expands to the point of permanent deformation between 80-90 tons of axial force.
The clearance, or drift, between the outer diameter of the expansion element 10 and the ID of the casing 12 is typically about ¼″, or a ⅛″ gap on the radius. In the case of an elastomeric element, capable of multi-use, partial extrusion of the elastomer is inevitable, but discouraged. Beveling of the uphole and downhole stops 52,54, or intermediate washers 46,46, minimizes cutting of the elastomer.
Use of a sleeve on the mandrel, or changing out the mandrel for a larger size keeps the thickness of the annular portion of the element generally constant. As stated, in the 5.5 and 7 inch casing the permanent diameter expansion is typically ⅝″ to ⅞″.
The casing expansion behaves predictably with increasing axial force and increasing diameter once the steel of the casing begins to yield. Applicant has determined that it is possible to expand casing diameter by up to 1.6″ which would completely fill the cement sheath's annular space between most casing and formation completions.
As discussed, the expansion element 10 plastically deforms the casing so that the diametral compression of the cement sheath 14 is maintained after actuation and further, in the case of a multi-use element, after removal of the expansion element 10 for re-positioning to a new location. While the magnitude of the plastic deformation can be larger than that required to shut off the simplest SCVF, it is however a conservative approach to ensure that all of the cement defects are resolved, including, micro-annular leak paths, radial cracks, “worm holes” and poor bonds between cement and geological formation. The minimum expansion provided is that which creates a permanent bulge or deformation in the casing that does not relax when the force is removed.
In testing, Applicant has successfully multi-cycled the elastomeric elements for a dozen or more compression cycles. Applicant also notes that the elastomeric appears to translate the axial force to radial force slightly more efficiently than the pleated ring and viscous fluid system.
In scale up, it is expected that a 220 ton (440,000 lb/ft setting tool will actuate the expansion elements for plastic deformation on thicker and more robust casing, such as the API 5CT L80 and P110 in about 26/ft casing weights (˜0.50″ wall thickness). Applicant has successfully tested P110 casing with axial loads of 170 tons and the expansion performance is similar to the same way that the tests for lighter casing.
Multi-Use Expansion
With reference to
Accordingly, and with reference to
In the event that three, spaced expansions are not sufficient to shut off the SCVF, as evidence by surface testing, one can repeat as necessary without having to replace the elastomeric element.
Turning to
As shown in
At
Setting Tool
As introduced above, the setting tool 20 provides axial forces for actuating the expansion element 10 axially for a corresponding radial expansion.
With a reminder back to
Turning to
Two or more of the pistons 106,106 . . . are coupled axially to each other and to the mandrel 44, such as through threaded connections. As the pistons 106, mandrel 44 and downhole stop 54 are hydraulically driven uphole, the outer sleeve 104 and uphole stop 52 are correspondingly and reactively driven downhole. Reactive, and downhole, movement of the outer sleeve 104 drives the uphole stop 52 towards the downhole stop 54.
Each piston 106 and cylinder 108 is stepped, providing a first uphole upset portion 116 and a second smaller downhole portion 118. The pistons uphole and downhole portions are sealed slidably in the cylinder 108. Hydraulic fluid F under pressure is provided to a chamber 120, situate between the uphole and downhole portions 116,118, which results in a net uphole piston area for an uphole force on the piston 106 and an equivalent downhole force on the outer sleeve 104.
As shown in
With reference to
The actuator sub 24 includes the mandrel 44 and a piston connector 122 between the pistons 106 and the mandrel 44. If the expansion element 10 is a single use element, then the mandrel 44 is releasably coupled to the balance of the setting tool 20. The mandrel 44 can be fixed to the piston connector 122 or releasable therefrom. For a multi-use element, the mandrel 44 is not necessarily releasably coupled, the mandrel being required during each of multiple expansions along the casing 12. Regardless, as if conventional for downhole, multi-component tools, for emergency release the mandrel 44 can be coupled with s shear screw or other overload safety.
For the instance of a single use expansion element, such as the stack 40 of pleated rings 42, the mandrel 44 is releasably coupled to the adapter sub 24. The adapter sub 24 and mandrel 44 further include a J-mechanism 140 having a J-slot housing 142 and a J-slot profile 144 formed in the mandrel 44. The J-slot housing and J-slot profile are coupled using pins 146. The J-slot housing 142 is connected to the piston connector 122 for axial movement within the adapter sub's outer shell 104 as delimited by the J-slot profile 144. The J-slot housing, pin 146 and J-slot profile connect the piston connector 122 to the mandrel 44. For managing large axial loads, the J-slot profile 144 can have multiple redundant pin 146 and slot 144 pairs for distributing the forces.
With reference to
In the case of a multi-use expansion element, such as the elastomeric element 10, the mandrel 44 remains connected to the piston connector 122 for repeated compression and release of the element ad different specified location 13. If either single use or multi-use expansion elements are to be used with the same setting tool, the J-mechanism 140 for release of the mandrel maybe enabled or disabled. A disabled J-mechanism 140 may include a locking pin or J-slot blanks fit to the J-profile to prevent J-slot operations.
Operation
As described in more detail above, and with reference again to
With reference to
Turning to the single use element of
In
Turning to
With reference to
In other embodiments the setting tool 20 and expansion element 10 can be applied in well systems that previously used swaging for plastically expanding pipe, tubing and casing. The current tool now enables axial actuation, at a specific location, for plastic expansion of tubulars of various configurations including liner hangers and casing patches. With axial setting forces now available in the hundreds of thousands of pounds, and an effective axial actuation to radial displacement, casing with wall thicknesses of up to ½″ or more are now available to completions, service, and abandonment companies.
Filing Document | Filing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
PCT/CA2018/050661 | 6/1/2018 | WO |
Publishing Document | Publishing Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
WO2019/227195 | 12/5/2019 | WO | A |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2119252 | Thaheld | May 1938 | A |
3068942 | Brown | Dec 1962 | A |
3464709 | Eckenrod | Sep 1969 | A |
3561527 | Nelson | Feb 1971 | A |
4069573 | Rogers, Jr. et al. | Jan 1978 | A |
4116451 | Nixon et al. | Sep 1978 | A |
4127168 | Hanson et al. | Nov 1978 | A |
4444400 | Norman | Apr 1984 | A |
4483399 | Colgate | Nov 1984 | A |
4688640 | Pritchard | Aug 1987 | A |
4716965 | Bol et al. | Jan 1988 | A |
5124254 | Hewlins et al. | Jun 1992 | A |
5127473 | Harris | Jul 1992 | A |
6581682 | Parent et al. | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6622797 | Sivley, IV | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6725917 | Metcalfe | Apr 2004 | B2 |
7000704 | Smith | Feb 2006 | B2 |
7168497 | Metcalfe | Jan 2007 | B2 |
7367391 | Stuart et al. | May 2008 | B1 |
7506687 | Ring | Mar 2009 | B2 |
7703542 | O'Connor et al. | Apr 2010 | B2 |
8453729 | Harris et al. | Jun 2013 | B2 |
9303477 | Harris et al. | Apr 2016 | B2 |
9752408 | Robben | Sep 2017 | B2 |
10794158 | Cornelissen | Oct 2020 | B2 |
20010045284 | Simpson et al. | Nov 2001 | A1 |
20020121372 | Cook | Sep 2002 | A1 |
20050056433 | Ring | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050217865 | Ring | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20070095532 | Head | May 2007 | A1 |
20080105431 | Baaijens | May 2008 | A1 |
20080142213 | Costa et al. | Jun 2008 | A1 |
20080223568 | Roggebond et al. | Sep 2008 | A1 |
20090321084 | Simmons | Dec 2009 | A1 |
20100019426 | Kunz | Jan 2010 | A1 |
20100122820 | Holland | May 2010 | A1 |
20100319427 | Lohbek | Dec 2010 | A1 |
20120097391 | Whiddon | Apr 2012 | A1 |
20150285026 | Frazier | Oct 2015 | A1 |
20170145782 | Ferg | May 2017 | A1 |
20180163490 | Styler | Jun 2018 | A1 |
20190169951 | Frazier | Jun 2019 | A1 |
20190352987 | Hrupp | Nov 2019 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
2487286 | Dec 2003 | CA |
2759158 | Aug 2007 | CA |
2842406 | Aug 2015 | CA |
2913933 | Dec 2015 | CA |
2433389 | Jun 2001 | CN |
103184866 | Jul 2013 | CN |
2599955 | Jun 2013 | EP |
WO 2017091911 | Jun 2017 | WO |
WO 2017197517 | Nov 2017 | WO |
WO 2018083069 | May 2018 | WO |
Entry |
---|
International Searching Authority, International Search and Written Opinion, dated Feb. 19, 2019 in PCT/CA2018/050661. |
Byrom T.G. Casing and Liners for Drilling and Completion. Design and Application. Gulf Drilling Guides. Second Edition. Sections 6.9.1-6.9.4 and p. 201. |
Hill et al. Large Elastic Compression of Finite Rectangular Blocks of Rubber. Q. Ji Mech. Appl. Math 42(2), pp. 267-287. Oxford University Press, 1989. |
Jackson, R.E. Gas Release Mechanisms from Energy Wellbores. ARMA 14-7753. 48th US Rock Mechanics / Geomechanics Symposium. Minneapolis, MN, USA, Jun. 1-4, 2014. |
Khandka, R.K. Leakage Behind Casing. IPG 4920 Drilling Specialization Thesis Work. NTNU, Jun. 11, 2007. |
Kupresan, D. et al. Experimental Assessment of Casing Expan . . . IADC/SPE SPE-168056-MS. 2014 IADC/SPE Drilling Conference and Exhibition. Fort Worth, Texas, USA, Mar. 4-6, 2014. |
Lakes, R. Compression of a block. http://silver.neep.wisc.edu/˜lakes/EMA611block.html. May 27, 2018. |
Pinarbasi, S. et al. Compression of solid and annular circular discs bonded to rigid surfaces. International Journal of Solids and Structures 45 (2008) 4543-4561. |
Sridharan, K. Deformation Analysis of Rubber Blocks Under Large Compressive Strain. JCHPS Special Issue 9: Apr. 2015, pp. 130-136. |
Technology Subgroup of the Operations & Environment Task Group. Paper #2-25. Plugging and Abandonment of Oil and Gas Wells. NPC North American Resource Sep. 15, 2011, pp. 1-21. |
Yeoh, O.H. The Compression Modulus of Tall Rubber Cylinders. J. Rubb. Res, Inst. Malaysia, 33(3), 109-114, 1985. |
Yuanhua, L. et al. An experimental study on reshaping C110 deformed casing with spinning casing swage. Natural Gas Industry B (2015) 257-262. |
George E. King Engineering. Plug and Abandonment—Producing Well. Slides. Mar. 14, 2009. GEKEngineering.com. |
Global CCS Institute. 2. Well Plugging and Abandonment Techniques. 2016. |
ITF. Through Tubing Logging—Plugging and Abandonment. Call for Proposals. Aug. 2015. |
Alberta Energy Regulator—Directive 020. Well Abandonment. Mar. 15, 2016. |
International Search Report and Written Opinion issued on International PCT Application No. PCT/CA2018/050661 dated Feb. 19, 2019. |
Extended European Search Report on European Patent Application No. 18920425.8 dated Dec. 3, 2021. |
Written Opinion issued on Singapore Patent Application No. 11202011981S dated Feb. 16, 2022. |
Machine English Translation of Chinese Patent Application No. 2433389, having a publication date of Jun. 6, 2001. |
Machine English Translation of Chinese Patent Application No. 103184866, having a publication date of Jul. 3, 2013. |
USPTO Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/334,975 dated Aug. 18, 2022. |
USPTO Office Action in U.S. Appl. No. 17/334,975 dated Nov. 29, 2022. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20210230957 A1 | Jul 2021 | US |