This invention relates in general to wellhead equipment for oil and gas wells, and in particular to a casing hanger full bore load ring mechanism.
A typical subsea wellhead assembly includes a wellhead housing that supports one or more casing hangers. One type of wellhead housing has a conical load shoulder machined within its bore. The casing hanger lands on and is supported by the load shoulder. In this type, the diameter of the housing bore below the bore is less than the diameter of the housing above the bore by a dimension equal to a radial width of the load shoulder.
In another type, referred to as “full bore”, the wellhead housing has a groove with substantially the same diameter above and below the groove. The load shoulder is a split ring that is installed subsequently in the groove. The casing hanger is supported by the load shoulder. This procedure allows a larger diameter bore to be employed during drilling operations. The load shoulder may be installed on a special running tool or it may be run with the casing hanger.
In this invention, the wellhead housing has a bore containing at least one conical generally upward facing load shoulder that inclines relative to an axis of the bore. A casing hanger is landed in the housing. The hanger has at least one conical downward facing load shoulder that inclines at a lesser inclination relative to an axis of the bore than the upward facing load shoulder. A split load ring is carried by the hanger for supporting the hanger on the upward facing load shoulder. The load ring has an inner profile that slidingly engages the downward facing load shoulder of the hanger and an outer profile that slidingly engages the upward facing load shoulder of the housing. The load ring is carried by the hanger for movement between a retracted position, wherein the outer profile is spaced radially inward from the upward facing load shoulder, and an expanded position wherein the outer profile is in engagement with the upward facing load shoulder.
Referring to
An internal grooved profile, formed in bore 13 above tag shoulder 15, comprises a plurality of load shoulders 17, each facing generally upward and inward, resulting in a generally saw-tooth configuration. A cylindrical stop space 19 is located between each load shoulder 17. Each stop spaces 19 is approximately the same axial length as one of the grooves that define one of the load shoulders 17.
A casing hanger 21 lands within wellhead housing 11. Casing hanger 21 has a lower threaded end 23 for securing to a string of casing (not shown) that extends into and is cemented in the well. Casing hanger 21 has a profile made up of a plurality of load shoulders 25, which preferably are fewer than wellhead housing shoulders 17. In this embodiment, there are two casing hanger load shoulders 25 and four wellhead housing load shoulders 17. The number of load shoulders 17, 25 can vary. In the preferred embodiment, each casing hanger load shoulder 25 has a greater radial depth and axial dimension than each wellhead housing load shoulder 17. Hanger load shoulders 25 preferably face downward and outward at a different angle than the upward and inward facing wellhead housing load shoulders 17. Preferably, the angle a relative to a vertical axis of hanger load shoulders 25 is less than an angle b of wellhead housing load shoulders 17 to a vertical axis, thus hanger load shoulders 25 are steeper. This results in a difference in angles indicated by the numeral 27 on the right side of
Referring briefly to
Referring again to
The angles of external load ring shoulders 33 differ from internal load ring shoulders 34. Differential angle 27 is selected to just overcome the resistance created by frictional effects occurring when load ring 31 moves from the retracted position of
Referring briefly again to
Referring to
In this embodiment, a plurality of trigger pins 49 extend radially from activation ring recess 47 to the outer diameter of activation ring 39. The outer ends of each pin 49 protrudes slightly past the outer diameter of activation ring 39 just below tag shoulder 41. A head or inner end of each trigger pin 49 contacts the outer diameter of latch ring 45. Trigger pins 41 keep latch ring 45 within the mating recesses 43 until activation ring tag shoulder 41 lands on tag shoulder 15, then cause latch ring 45 to move out of engagement with annular recess 47.
Referring to
Referring to
In the running operation of hanger 21, load ring 31 will be in the retracted position shown in
As hanger 21 moves downward relative to load ring 31, hanger load shoulders 25 exert a downward and outward force normal to load shoulders 25. At the same time, wellhead housing load shoulders 17 provide an upward and inward reactive force normal to load shoulder 17. These forces are not directly opposed because of the different angles of load shoulders 17, 25. The reactive force from shoulders 17 is not directed as much radially inward as the downward force from shoulders 25 is directed radially outward, thus resulting in a net outward directed force being applied to load ring 31. The frictional effects between load ring 31 and load shoulders 17, 25 tend to retard the radial outward movement of load ring 31, thus the net outward force due to the difference 27 in angles is calculated to be somewhat more than the opposed frictional force. Steeper angles for load shoulders 17 and 25 would provide more outward net force to load ring 31 during setting, but would reduce the axial load capacity.
Once fully engaged, a small axial clearance 51 (
Slacking off the weight in running string will indicate that load ring 31 has set. As a further assurance, the operator can apply a selected overpull. The casing and hanger 21 will move upward slightly relative to activation ring 39 and load ring 31until rib 48 contacts the rib on ring 46. A selected overpull, say 200,00 pounds, will be necessary to cause rib 48 to snap past the rib of ring 46, thus the operator will pull upward a fraction of that amount, such as 100,000 pounds, to determine if rib 48 is pushing against the rib on ring 46. If so, this indicates that load ring 31 has properly set. The operator can then slack off the weight.
The angular difference 27 (
Referring to
An activation ring 61 is mounted to the lower end of upper hanger 53. Activation ring 61 may be secured to upper hanger 53 by shear pins (not shown) that initially pin activation ring 61 to upper hanger 53 in a running position. When activation ring 61 lands on the upper end of lower hanger 21, the weight of the running string applied to upper hanger 53 shears the pins and causes upper hanger 53 to move downward relative to activation ring 61 and load ring 57.
A mudline hanger assembly is shown in the embodiment of
An activation ring 77 may be secured to hanger 71 by trigger pins as in the first embodiment. This embodiment could also use the detent rib and collet finger arrangement of the first embodiment, if desired. Activation ring 77 lands on a tag shoulder in the bore of housing 63 and causes load ring 73 to set in the same manner as upper casing hanger 53 (
The invention has significant advantages. The difference between the load shoulders in the housing and on the casing hanger reduces friction while setting. The reduction in friction allows the load shoulders to be oriented at larger angles relative to the axis to support larger axial loads. The load shoulder arrangement increases the load bearing capacity of the hanger and wellhead housing.
While the invention has been shown in only two of its forms, it should be apparent to those skilled in the art that it is not so limited but is susceptible to various changes without departing from the scope of the invention.
This application claims priority to provisional application 60/579,629, filed Jun. 15, 2004.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2849245 | Baker | Aug 1958 | A |
4528738 | Galle, Jr. | Jul 1985 | A |
4641708 | Wightman | Feb 1987 | A |
4665979 | Boehm, Jr. | May 1987 | A |
4773477 | Putch | Sep 1988 | A |
4836579 | Wester et al. | Jun 1989 | A |
4909546 | Nobileau | Mar 1990 | A |
4989902 | Putch | Feb 1991 | A |
5160172 | Gariepy | Nov 1992 | A |
5226478 | Henderson et al. | Jul 1993 | A |
5240076 | Cromar et al. | Aug 1993 | A |
5249629 | Jennings | Oct 1993 | A |
5421407 | Thornburrow | Jun 1995 | A |
5638903 | Kent | Jun 1997 | A |
5839512 | Malone et al. | Nov 1998 | A |
6012519 | Allen et al. | Jan 2000 | A |
20050051337 | Jennings et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20060016604 | Ford | Jan 2006 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20050274526 A1 | Dec 2005 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
60579629 | Jun 2004 | US |