This application claims priority to German Patent Application DE102008011644.0 filed Feb. 28, 2008, the entirety of which is incorporated by reference herein.
The aerodynamic loadability and the efficiency of fluid flow machines such as blowers, compressors, pumps and fans, is limited in particular by the growth and the separation of boundary layers in the rotor and stator blade tip area near the casing or the hub wall, respectively. On blade rows with running gaps, this leads to re-flow phenomena and the occurrence of instability of the machine at higher loads. Fluid flow machines according to the state of the art either have no particular features to provide remedy in this area, or so-called casing treatments are used as counter-measure including the most varied configurations of chambers and/or angular slots, mostly in the casing above the rotor.
Known solutions are revealed for example in the following documents:
US 2005/0226717 A1 (Flow Control Arrangement)
DE 101 35 003 C1 (Compressor Casing Structure)
DE 103 30 084 A1 (Recirculation Structure for Turbocompressors)
The present invention therefore relates to fluid flow machines, such as blowers, compressors, pumps and fans of the axial, semi-axial and radial type. The working medium or fluid may be gaseous or liquid.
The fluid flow machine according to the present invention may include one or several stages, each of which having a rotor and a stator.
According to the present invention, the rotor includes of a number of blades which are connected to the rotating shaft of the fluid flow machine and impart energy to the working medium. The rotor features a free blade end on the casing. The stator in accordance with the present invention includes a number of stationary blades which, on the casing side, have a fixed blade end.
In accordance with the present invention, the fluid flow machine may be provided with a special type of stator upstream of the first rotor, a so-called inlet guide vane assembly.
According to the present invention, at least one stator or inlet guide vane assembly, instead of being fixed, can be variable to change the angle of attack. A spindle accessible from the outside of the annulus duct can, for example, accomplish such a variation.
The fluid flow machine may, in a special form, be provided with at least one row of variable rotors.
In an alternative configuration, said fluid flow machine may also have a bypass configuration, with the single-flow annulus duct dividing into two concentric annuli behind a certain blade row, with each of these annuli housing at least one further blade row.
More particularly, the present invention relates to the shape of a section of the annulus duct wall along the hub of a fluid flow machine and the arrangement and shaping of recesses in said annulus duct wall section in the area of a blade row with free end and running gap.
A broad aspect of the present invention is to provide a fluid flow machine of the type specified above which, while avoiding the disadvantages of the state of the art, is characterized by exerting a highly effective influence on the boundary layer in the blade tip area.
According to this invention, structure has been provided which enables flow control by way of casing treatment to be optimized by improving the flow boundary conditions of the hub treatment. The present invention therefore provides for an optimized design of circumferential grooves with regard to the axial position of the latter on the rotor below the stators. The grooves have corresponding cross-sections and, according to the present invention, can therefore be geometrically simple and geometrically complex freeform surfaces.
Hub treatment according to the present invention can be provided with both fixed, constant geometry and adaptive, time-variable geometry.
In accordance with the present invention, improved compressor stability is therefore provided which, in dependence of design, can also result in improved efficiency provided the measure enables suction-side separation to be reduced.
With the form of hub treatment according to the present invention, optimum flow in the circumferential groove, in particular in dependence of the axial length, and optimum interaction with the main flow are achieved.
Besides the above mentioned arrangement as a circumferential groove, an arrangement as an axial groove would also be suitable, with the arrangement being radially and axially inclinable. The forwardly inclined arrangement leads to a flattening of the outflow vector, resulting in lower inflow loss.
According to the present invention, provision is therefore made to correspondingly change and modify the hub contour of the compressor in the area of the hub in order to optimize the hub area of the free blade ends of the stators with regard to flow.
The present invention is more fully described in light of the accompanying drawings showing preferred embodiments. In the drawings,
In the following examples identical parts are given the same reference numerals.
The blade 3 accordingly is a stator blade connected to the casing 1 in relation to which the hub 2 rotates about a center axis/rotary axis/machine axis.
In
The angles γ and δ shown in
The half-heart shape shown in
The further course of the curve (half-heart shape) is selected such that it is continuous and, accordingly, two times differentiable. Curvature jumps are thus avoided. The angles α and β are selected in accordance with the inflow and outflow conditions of the rotor.
The further course of the curve (half-heart shape) can be defined by B-splines and/or Bézier curves, for example. It is a cardioid which additionally was rotated about an axis (coordinate transformation).
In this context, mention should also be made that, in accordance with the present invention, the grooves or recesses 4 need not be distributed equally on the circumference. Rather, they can also be distributed unequally and independently of each other.
According to the present invention, the basic shape of the recesses can be angular, round or oval, it may also vary with the radial extension.
Furthermore, according to the present invention, the individual recesses can be equally dimensioned or differ within the limits of the above mentioned parameters.
Number | Date | Country | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
10 2008 011 644 | Feb 2008 | DE | national |
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
2933238 | Stalker | Apr 1960 | A |
3066912 | Scheper | Dec 1962 | A |
3572960 | McBride | Mar 1971 | A |
3694102 | Conrad | Sep 1972 | A |
3846038 | Carriere et al. | Nov 1974 | A |
3849023 | Klompas | Nov 1974 | A |
3993414 | Meauze et al. | Nov 1976 | A |
4155680 | Linko et al. | May 1979 | A |
4415310 | Bouiller et al. | Nov 1983 | A |
4466772 | Okapuu et al. | Aug 1984 | A |
4479755 | Skoe | Oct 1984 | A |
4642027 | Popp | Feb 1987 | A |
4659282 | Popp | Apr 1987 | A |
5059093 | Khalid et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5203162 | Burge | Apr 1993 | A |
5230605 | Yamaguchi | Jul 1993 | A |
5308225 | Koff et al. | May 1994 | A |
5327716 | Giffin et al. | Jul 1994 | A |
5431533 | Hobbs | Jul 1995 | A |
5474417 | Privett et al. | Dec 1995 | A |
5480284 | Wadia et al. | Jan 1996 | A |
5707206 | Goto et al. | Jan 1998 | A |
5762034 | Foss | Jun 1998 | A |
5762470 | Gelmedov et al. | Jun 1998 | A |
5876182 | Schulte | Mar 1999 | A |
5950308 | Koff et al. | Sep 1999 | A |
6109868 | Bulman et al. | Aug 2000 | A |
6234747 | Mielke et al. | May 2001 | B1 |
6290458 | Irie et al. | Sep 2001 | B1 |
6574965 | Feuner | Jun 2003 | B1 |
6585479 | Torrance | Jul 2003 | B2 |
6619909 | Barnett et al. | Sep 2003 | B2 |
6663346 | Munsell et al. | Dec 2003 | B2 |
6742983 | Schmuecker | Jun 2004 | B2 |
6832890 | Booth | Dec 2004 | B2 |
7077623 | Guemmer | Jul 2006 | B2 |
7097414 | Stangeland | Aug 2006 | B2 |
7186072 | Seitz | Mar 2007 | B2 |
7387487 | Guemmer | Jun 2008 | B2 |
7575412 | Seitz | Aug 2009 | B2 |
7594793 | Guemmer | Sep 2009 | B2 |
7645121 | Tudor | Jan 2010 | B2 |
7811049 | Xu | Oct 2010 | B2 |
7861823 | Prasad et al. | Jan 2011 | B2 |
20030026695 | Schmuecker | Feb 2003 | A1 |
20040081552 | Guemmer | Apr 2004 | A1 |
20050019152 | Seitz | Jan 2005 | A1 |
20050058541 | Le Biez et al. | Mar 2005 | A1 |
20050226717 | Xu | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20050238483 | Guemmer | Oct 2005 | A1 |
20060051199 | Guemmer | Mar 2006 | A1 |
20060104805 | Guemmer | May 2006 | A1 |
20060153673 | Guemmer | Jul 2006 | A1 |
20080044273 | Khalid | Feb 2008 | A1 |
20080199306 | Lebret | Aug 2008 | A1 |
20090160135 | Turini et al. | Jun 2009 | A1 |
20090290974 | Bayere et al. | Nov 2009 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
889506 | Sep 1953 | DE |
1042828 | Nov 1958 | DE |
1428188 | Nov 1968 | DE |
3407945 | Sep 1985 | DE |
19632207 | Feb 1998 | DE |
10135003 | Oct 2002 | DE |
10233032 | Jan 2004 | DE |
10330084 | Mar 2004 | DE |
102004043036 | Mar 2006 | DE |
0497574 | Sep 1995 | EP |
0718469 | Jun 1996 | EP |
0754864 | Jan 1997 | EP |
0719908 | Mar 2000 | EP |
1013937 | Jun 2000 | EP |
1286022 | Feb 2003 | EP |
1382855 | Jan 2004 | EP |
619722 | Mar 1949 | GB |
987625 | Mar 1965 | GB |
2408546 | Jun 2005 | GB |
9510692 | Apr 1995 | WO |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20090246007 A1 | Oct 2009 | US |