The present invention relates generally to burial caskets. More particularly, the present invention relates to a burial handle with retractable handles.
Burial or internment in a casket is the most common method in the United States and many other countries to dispose of human remains. The body of the deceased is placed in the casket which is then placed in a burial vault and buried. Similarly the casket can be placed in a mausoleum or crypt.
Caskets come in a standard size, typically having external dimensions of 20″×30″×79″ (H×W×L). In order to avoid the additional cost for non standard or oversized vaults or crypts, the exterior dimensions of the casket must fit within a standard sized vault or crypt.
The obesity epidemic facing the United States and other developed nations has presented a new problem to the bereaved and funeral industry as a whole. When an obese individual dies, they often will not fit inside a standard sized casket. This means an oversized casket must be used. If the exterior dimensions of the oversized casket (including the side handles) exceeds the interior dimensions of the burial vault, an oversized burial vault must be used. All of this adds a considerable amount of additional expense.
In placing an obese person into a casket and then into a burial vault the critical dimension becomes the width of the casket. This situation is complicated by the fact the exterior width of the casket is increased by the handles located on either side of the exterior of the casket. If the exterior width of the casket is 30″ this will typically leave the prior art casket with an interior width of 22″ to 24″.
What is needed is a way to more efficiently use this external width of the casket. Essentially this means finding away to maximize the internal width of the casket while maintaining the overall external width of the casket within the standard internal width of a standard sized burial vault.
Prior art teaches various caskets handles which extend and retract. However none of these provide a handle which is flush with the exterior wall of the casket while the handle is in a stored or retracted position.
Further the handles in prior that do retract partially into the sidewall of the casket require an increased thickness of the sidewall. This means that while the amount the retracted handle protrudes from the exterior of the sidewall is reduced the interior width is diminished. Thus they do not provide a solution to this problem.
What is needed, therefore, is a casket which has handles that maximize the interior width while minimizing the exterior width.
The present invention achieves its objections by providing a casket with retractable handles which are flush with the sidewalls. The casket comprises a first and second sidewall, a first and second end wall, an exterior bottom, an interior floor, a top connected to one of said sidewall and a reinforcement member offset form one of said sidewall. A first and second opening are linearly aligned and pass through a sidewall and the reinforcement member respectively. An elongated handle with a first end and a second end, extends through and is slidingly received in said first and second opening, said handle having a stored position wherein said first end is flush with said sidewall and an extended position where said handle extends from said sidewall. In the preferred embodiment the first and second opening, and elongated handle are received in between the bottom of the casket and interior floor of the casket.
The present invention allows the casket manufacturer to maximize the interior width of the casket while maintaining an outside width capable of fitting into a standard sized burial vault.
Preferred embodiments of the invention will now be described in further detail. Other features, aspects, and advantages of the present invention will become better understood with regard to the following detailed description, appended claims, and accompanying drawings (which are not to scale) where:
Turning now to the drawings wherein like reference characters indicate like or similar parts throughout,
As best seen in
An elongated handle 44 with a first end 46 and a second end 48 extends through and is slidingly received in the first and second opening 40 and 42. The handle 44 has a stored position as seen in
The preferred embodiment of the present invention has a retention mechanism 50. In the preferred embodiment the retention mechanism is comprised of a metal bracket or washer 52 located on the second end 48 of the elongated handles 44. When the handle 44 is in the stored position the bracket 52 is engaged by a magnetic latch mechanism 54 which holds the elongated handle 44 securely in the stored position as best seen in
In order to release the elongated handle 44 from the stored position, the first end 46 of the elongated handle 44 must be depressed inward towards the latch mechanism 54. This causes the latch mechanism 54 to extend as shown in
In order to move the elongated handle 44 into the extended position as seen in
In order to return the elongated handle 44 to the stored position, the elongated handle is slid inwardly until the second end 48 of the elongated handle 44 and the bracket 52 engage the latch mechanism 54. The elongated handle 44 is then pressed inwardly until the latch mechanism 54 is re-engaged with the elongated handle 44 in the stored position.
Turning now to
While the preferred embodiment of the present invention shown in the attached figures shows a magnetic type latch mechanism 54 which engages a magnetic bracket 52, other latch mechanisms 54 could be used to practice this invention.
The foregoing description details certain preferred embodiments of the present invention and describes the best mode contemplated. It will be appreciated, however, that changes may be made in the details of construction and the configuration of components without departing from the spirit and scope of the disclosure. Therefore, the description provided herein is to be considered exemplary, rather than limiting, and the true scope of the invention is that defined by the following claims and the full range of equivalency to which each element thereof is entitled.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 582239 | Snypp | May 1897 | A |
| 686280 | Gaudin | Nov 1901 | A |
| 751685 | Sanford | Feb 1904 | A |
| 869423 | Cowan | Oct 1907 | A |
| 959235 | Lemieux | May 1910 | A |
| 1016392 | Boudrot | Feb 1912 | A |
| 1112517 | Boisvert | Oct 1914 | A |
| 1851225 | Wesemann | Mar 1932 | A |
| 2091495 | Steen | Aug 1937 | A |
| 2527721 | Haacke | Oct 1950 | A |
| 3243837 | Smith | Apr 1966 | A |
| 3744084 | Fankhouser | Jul 1973 | A |
| 3844003 | Angermann | Oct 1974 | A |
| 4146948 | Royce et al. | Apr 1979 | A |
| 5372363 | Siddle | Dec 1994 | A |
| 7921528 | Elhaj | Apr 2011 | B2 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 08238278 | Sep 1996 | JP |