The invention relates to a dual fuel main burner nozzle used in a dry, low NOx gas turbine engine where a fuel manifold and rocket bases are integrally formed in a casting.
Dry Low NOx (DLN) gas turbine engines include a can annular combustion arrangement where each can combustor includes a pilot burner and several main premix burners disposed circumferentially about the pilot burner. For each can combustor there is a main fuel nozzle that supplies one or more fuels to the main premix burners, and a pilot nozzle that supplies one or more fuels to the pilot burner. DLN engines produce 25 parts per million (PPM) NOx, or less. Ultra Low NOx (ULN) engines are an emerging class of engines that produce even lower levels of NOx than DLN engines.
DLN gas turbine engines are a result of an evolution of gas turbine engines where unwanted emissions have been reduced and efficiency increased by engine designs where the firing temperatures and operating pressures are ever increasing. The main burner fuel nozzle (a.k.a. support housing) is disposed in the compressed air manifold at an inlet end of the combustor where compressed air is at its greatest pressure, greatest temperature, and where the compressed air is undergoing a reversal of flow direction at the inlet end of the combustor. The high temperature and high pressure of the operating environment, as well as corrosive fuels, are known to cause stress corrosion cracking in the main fuel nozzle, which leads to limited life for the fuel manifold.
Concurrent with the need to survive in the relatively harsh DLN (as well as ultra low NOx (ULN) operating environment is a requirement that a fuel manifold of the main burner fuel nozzle be able to receive one or more fuel supplies and distribute them to several different fuel rockets, where there is one rocket for each premix main burner. The fuel rockets may further be divided into more than one stage. Further complicating the fuel manifold's design, in some embodiments the fuel manifold must be able to receive a second, different fuel and also distribute the second fuel to each rocket, also perhaps in more than one stage.
Conventionally, due to the complication of the fuel manifold, the required passages were machined into the fuel manifold. Milling, drilling, and welding-together the fuel manifold parts in order to create the complex channels resulted in stress risers where sharp corners were created, or where welds were located in regions of relatively high stress within the finished fuel manifold etc. In order to provide a fuel manifold that was strong enough to resist stress corrosion cracking long enough to provide a support housing with a viable lifespan, designers have used forged sub components and joined them together to form the fuel manifold. The fuel rockets were then welded to the forged fuel manifold. This technique has provided great flexibility in design, but it has a cost because the forged parts are more expensive, and machining it likewise expensive.
Complicating the matter still further is a need to provide for an expansion element on the main burner fuel nozzle to accommodate the relative thermal expansion of the internal fuel circuits. For example, in a dual fuel main burner nozzle, a fuel gas may be directed to an interior of the fuel rocket via one or more stages of fuel gas circuits. A fuel oil may also be directed through the fuel rocket and be ejected from the fuel rocket at a location proximate where the fuel gas is ejected. The fuel oil tube may be secured to the main burner nozzle and the fuel rocket ejection location, but the fuel rocket and the fuel oil tube often experience differential thermal expansion. Previously, this has been accommodated using a bellows type compensator built into the base of the fuel rocket. However, the thin plies of the bellows are highly susceptible to a number of failure modes, including stress corrosion cracking, cyclic failure, and rupture.
To overcome the foregoing problems and yet provide a main fuel nozzle having a reasonable service life designers have continued to seek stronger and stronger materials for the fuel manifold, and with this comes the attendant higher cost. Consequently, there remains room for improvement in the art.
The invention is explained in the following description in view of the drawings that show:
The present inventors have taken a comprehensive look at the design of the main fuel nozzles (a.k.a. support housing) and have developed a solution that reverses the conventional trend of seeking stronger materials for at least the fuel manifold portion of the support housing to ensure a reasonable service life for a DLN main fuel burner nozzle. Instead, the inventors have developed a DLN main burner support housing design that allows for the use of a substantially weaker casting for the fuel manifold portion, where the fuel manifold and rocket bases may be cast together. Using a casting is less expensive, and yet the new design is so effective it has been shown to improve the service life by as much as a factor of 2 over the previous forged designs.
Unlike the prior art, where there were fuel oil galleries within the fuel manifold to distribute the fuel oil, in the exemplary embodiment there are a plurality of oil tube passageways 64, each providing passage from an upstream end 66 of the fuel manifold 56, which is also an upstream end 67 of the cast section 52, to an interior 68 of a respective fuel rocket 58. Disposed within each oil tube passageway 64 may be a respective oil tube 70. Each oil tube 70 may include a thermal expansion element, such as a coil 72, which may be disposed in the respective fuel rocket base 60. Since the oil tube 70 is essentially fixed proximate the fuel manifold upstream end 66 and also fixed proximate a tip 74 of the fuel rocket 58, differential thermal expansion of the oil tube 70 with respect to the fuel rocket 58 necessitates the thermal expansion element (i.e. the coil 72) be present to provide relief. Due to limitations in the manufacturing of the oil tube 70 and in particular, a minimum diameter of the coil 72, the fuel rocket base 60 is made larger than prior art rocket bodies in order to accommodate the diameter of the coil 72.
Similar to the prior art, in the exemplary embodiment there may be an a-stage gas gallery 80 and a b-stage gas gallery 82 located relatively upstream of the a-stage gas gallery 80. In the prior art the fuel oil galleries 22, 24 are disposed relatively proximate an outer surface of the forged fuel manifold 14. This proximity to the warm compressed air flowing by the fuel manifold outer surface can, at times, raise the possibility of coking of the fuel oil in the fuel gas galleries. This, in turn, decreases service life of the main burner nozzle. Consequently, in the exemplary embodiment shown, the fuel oil galleries 22, 24 have been eliminated in favor of the oil tube passageways 64 and the oil tubes 70, which have also been moved radially inward with respect to the main burner nozzle longitudinal axis 26, away from a relatively warm outer surface 84 of the fuel manifold 56. In this manner not only is the fuel oil disposed at a greater distance from the warm compressed air than in the prior art designs, but as will be made clearer in following figures, most of the oil tube passageways 64 are disposed such that at least one, if not both stages of gas galleries completely surround material that defines the oil tube passageways 64. Thus, when fuel oil is being used, the fuel gas galleries and any fluid therein, such as compressed air etc, may act as a layer of insulation around most, if not all, of each of the oil tube passageways 64, thereby reducing even further any risk of coking.
Further, in the prior art design, having the fuel oil galleries 22, 24 disposed so close to the fuel manifold outer surface 84 resulted in a high thermal gradient in the region of the fuel manifold between the fuel oil galleries 22, 24 containing a supply of relatively cool fuel oil and the fuel manifold outer surface 84 that is exposed to the relatively warm compressor air. This large thermal gradient reduced the service life of the fuel manifold. In the configuration disclosed herein the oil tubes 70 have been moved radially inward and as a result there is a smaller thermal gradient in the area of the fuel manifold outer surface 84. These design changes work together to increase the service life of the support housing 50.
The design changes have also resulted in a decreased pressure drop experienced by fuel as it passes through the support housing 50. To provide control of the overall pressure drop between a fuel supply line 86 common to all the fuel rockets 58, a tuning orifice 88 may be installed. In addition to tuning the pressure drop, having a tuning orifice 88 in each combustor can enable better can-to-can tuning for optimum combustor system performance.
In light of the fact that the fuel manifold 56 and fuel rocket bases 60 are integrally cast, it is understood that the only welds that may be present in the cast section 52 may be present where core plugs 96 are used to fill core print holes in the cast section 52 formed by parts of a core used in manufacturing. These core plugs 96, and core plug welds 98 used to hold them in place, can readily be designed such that neither the core plug 96 nor core plug welds 98 are disposed in any corner within the cast section 52. Consequently, the cast section 52 may be almost entirely free of welds, and the minimal welds that do exist may be disposed remote from regions of relatively high stress. This further reduces the need to use a stronger forged material. Overall, the new design reduces stress in the fuel manifold 56 and fuel rocket bases 60 so much that the service life of the support housing 50 using the cast section 52 may be double that of the main burner nozzle 10 using the prior art, forged fuel manifold 14.
In particular, one property relating the strength of a material is the yield strength. For typical stainless steels and high nickel alloys that are used within fuel nozzles the cast version of these alloys has a yield strength that may be reduced by 30% from its forged counterpart. For example, at room temperature, forged IN625 has a yield strength of 410 Mpa, where cast IN625 has a yield strength of 300 Mpa. Other examples of acceptable materials for use in a DLN engine include but are not limited to: cast CN7M, which has a yield strength of 170 Mpa; forged HastX has a yield strength of 360 Mpa; forged Alloy20 has a yield strength of 240 Mpa; and forged 310 and 316 stainless steels both have yield strengths of 200 Mpa. Thus, materials having yield strengths below 200 Mpa may be used successfully in DLN engines and be created via the less expensive casting process.
Requirements for part life and operating condition will determine largely which alloy is needed to meet particular operating requirements. Typical operating conditions for a DLN gas turbine engine, which are considered relatively harsh, include an operating temperature for the fuel of 20-250 degrees Celsius, a shell temperature of 400-500 degrees Celsius, and operating pressures of 18-24 bar. Consequently, the cast support housing can be used so long as it provides at least the strength required to have a reasonable service life in the DLN engine, and can do so for less expenses than the forged support housing. The manifold disclosed herein may be suitable for use in a variety of DLN and ULN (ultra low emission) engines, including but not limited to Siemens models SGT6-5000F, SGT6-3000E, SGT5/6-8000H.
While various embodiments of the present invention have been shown and described herein, it will be obvious that such embodiments are provided by way of example only. Numerous variations, changes and substitutions may be made without departing from the invention herein. Accordingly, it is intended that the invention be limited only by the spirit and scope of the appended claims.
This application claims benefit of the 23 Sep. 2011 filing date of application No. 61/538,385, which is incorporated by reference herein.
Number | Name | Date | Kind |
---|---|---|---|
3288355 | Laing | Nov 1966 | A |
4258544 | Gebhart et al. | Mar 1981 | A |
4609150 | Pane et al. | Sep 1986 | A |
4930703 | Ford et al. | Jun 1990 | A |
4938418 | Halvorsen | Jul 1990 | A |
5058703 | Ealba et al. | Oct 1991 | A |
5415000 | Mumford et al. | May 1995 | A |
6672073 | Wiebe | Jan 2004 | B2 |
7926279 | Wasif et al. | Apr 2011 | B2 |
8225610 | Reed et al. | Jul 2012 | B2 |
8479520 | Terada et al. | Jul 2013 | B2 |
8544276 | Terada et al. | Oct 2013 | B2 |
20080072602 | Wasif et al. | Mar 2008 | A1 |
Number | Date | Country |
---|---|---|
0375311 | Jun 1990 | EP |
0687865 | Dec 1995 | EP |
2182290 | May 2010 | EP |
Entry |
---|
Alloy 20 webpage, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Alloy—20, accessed on Jun. 8, 2015. |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
20130074946 A1 | Mar 2013 | US |
Number | Date | Country | |
---|---|---|---|
61538385 | Sep 2010 | US |