Patent Grant
11628426
The technology described herein relates to industrial processes for generating products from basic petroleum products and more specifically to oxygen carrying catalysts for chemical looping combustion which is used for power generation and synthesis of hydrogen and industrial chemicals.
Chemical looping combustion (CLC) is a process used to capture CO2 and to convert carbonaceous fuel into various products including power, hydrogen, and industrial chemicals. A typical CLC system consists of two reactors; a fuel reactor and an air reactor. In the fuel reactor, the metal oxide is reduced, and the fuel is completely converted into CO2 and steam. While in the air reactor, the reduced metal oxides are oxidized using air which also produces heat that can be utilized for power generation. The two separate reactors are used to avoid contact of the fuel with other air constituents, which in turns leads to production of a highly concentrated CO2 stream.1
Oxygen carrier catalysts based on individual metal oxides used for chemical looping combustion have various advantages and disadvantages. Hence, the use of oxygen carriers based on mixed metal oxides has been suggested to combine the advantages of individual metal oxides together with partial mitigation of the disadvantages.2
Investigations of CLC catalysts have been reported over the past two decades.
In one investigation, WO3/W was used for methane conversion and the reactivities of the tungsten metals/oxides were found to be enhanced with the use of the support. Silica, alumina and zirconia supports were tested and it was found that the zirconia-supported catalyst provided excellent performance in terms of product yield when compared to unsupported WO3, silica and alumina supported by WO3.3
In another study, the effect of WO3 modification of ZrO2 on Ni-catalyzed dry reforming of biogas was investigated with 8% (w/w) Ni catalyst. Although Ni dispersion and reducibility characteristics were superior for the WO3-modified catalyst relative to non-modified ZrO2, its catalytic performance was inferior as a result of enhanced acidity.4
A dual catalyst for chemical looping partial oxidation of methane was tested with WO3-based catalyst modified with Ni over an alumina support.5,6
Nickel mixed with WO3/Al2O3 has been designed and proposed to be used for HDS (Hydrodesulfurization).7
Nickel oxide over zirconia prepared by co-precipitation and further modified by tungsten oxide (WO3) has been investigated in dimerization of ethylene. The addition of WO3 to NiO/ZrO2 resulted in enhancement of reactivity even at room temperature.8
In another investigation, WO3/ZrO2 was prepared via incipient wetness impregnation and further modified by the addition of Ni with maximum Ni loading of 5%. The resultant catalysts were tested for n-butane isomerization, cyclohexane dehydrogenation and n-octane hydroisomerization-cracking. The Ni addition led to increases in total acidity and concentration of strong acid sites, providing enhancement of dehydrogenation and cracking reactions.9
There continues to be a need for improved catalysts for use in CLC.
According to one embodiment, there is provided a catalyst for use in chemical looping combustion. The catalyst comprises a mixture of metal oxides dispersed on a ceramic support, the mixture of metal oxides forming a nickel tungsten oxide (NiWO4) interaction complex which functions as an oxygen carrier in the chemical looping combustion reaction.
In some embodiments of the catalyst, the ceramic support is calcium aluminate of formula CaAl2O4, silica of formula SiO2, titanium dioxide of formula TiO2, perovskite of formula CaTiO3, alumina of formula Al2O3, yttrium dioxide of formula Y2O3, barium zirconate of formula BaZrO3, magnesium aluminate of formula MgAl2O4, magnesium silicate of formula MgSi2O4, lanthanum oxide of formula La2O3 or zirconia of formula ZrO2.
In some embodiments of the catalyst, the ceramic support is zirconia of formula ZrO2.
In some embodiments of the catalyst, the zirconia is calcined at a temperature at or above about 900° C. for at least about 4 hours.
In some embodiments of the catalyst, the mixture of metal oxides includes nickel oxide of formula NiO and tungsten oxide of formula WO3.
In some embodiments, the catalyst comprises between about 25% to about 60% NiO (w/w), between about 10% to about 35% WO3 (w/w) and between about 5% to about 65% ZrO2 (w/w).
In some embodiments, the catalyst has an oxygen carrying capacity of about 4.2% (w/w) to about 15.6% (w/w).
In some embodiments, the catalyst has a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area between about 4.1 m2/g to about 16.7 m2/g.
In some embodiments, the catalyst has a pore volume of about 0.030 cm3/g to about 0.094 cm3/g.
In some embodiments, the catalyst has an adsorption average pore width (4V/A by BET) between about 225 Å to about 300 Å.
According to another embodiment, there is provided a process for synthesizing an oxygen carrier catalyst. The process includes the steps of mixing nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (N2NiO6.6H2O) with ammonium metatungstate and a ceramic support in water and evaporating the water.
In some embodiments of the process, the ceramic support is calcium aluminate of formula CaAl2O4, silica of formula SiO2, titanium dioxide of formula TiO2, perovskite of formula CaTiO3, alumina of formula Al2O3, yttrium dioxide of formula Y2O3, barium zirconate of formula BaZrO3, magnesium aluminate of formula MgAl2O4, magnesium silicate of formula MgSi2O4, lanthanum oxide of formula La2O3 or zirconia of formula ZrO2.
In some embodiments of the process, the ceramic support is zirconia of formula ZrO2.
In some embodiments of the process, the zirconia is calcined at a temperature at or above about 900° C. for at least about 4 hours.
In some embodiments of the process, the synthesized catalyst includes nickel oxide of formula NiO and tungsten oxide of formula WO3.
In some embodiments of the process, the synthesized catalyst includes between about 25% to about 60% NiO (w/w), between about 10% to about 35% WO3 (w/w) and between about 5% to about 65% ZrO2 (w/w).
In some embodiments of the process, the synthesized catalyst has an oxygen carrying capacity of about 4.2% (w/w) to about 15.6% (w/w).
In some embodiments of the process, the synthesized catalyst has a Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area between about 4.1 m2/g to about 16.7 m2/g.
In some embodiments of the process, the synthesized catalyst has a pore volume of about 0.030 cm3/g to about 0.094 cm3/g.
In some embodiments of the process, the synthesized catalyst has an adsorption average pore width (4V/A by BET) between about 225 Å to about 300 Å.
Various objects, features and advantages of embodiments of the subject technology will be apparent from the following description.
Rationale
Carbon (coke) formation associated with Ni-based oxygen carriers results in transportation of carbon to the air reactor with the oxygen carriers. Then the carbon is converted to CO2 in the air reactor, resulting in degradation of CO2 separation efficacy. If methane is used as a fuel in CLC, carbon can be formed through methane decomposition (equation 1) or the Boudouard reaction (equation 2).10
CH4→C+2H2 (eq 1)
2CO→+C+CO2 (eq 2)
The inventors recognized that further investigation of WO3-modified supports such as ZrO2 further modified with oxides of nickel would be a worthwhile endeavor which could lead to improvements in catalytic reactivity with enhanced oxygen carrying capacity and mitigation of formation of carbon (coke) on the surface of the catalyst.
Experiments leading to identification of useful catalyst compositions for CLC will now be described hereinbelow with reference to data shown in tables and figures. A number of possible alternative features are introduced during the course of this description. It is to be understood that, according to the knowledge and judgment of persons skilled in the art, such alternative features may be substituted in various combinations to arrive at different embodiments.
A novel nickel-based oxygen carrier catalyst for chemical looping combustion (CLC) is described. Zirconia (ZrO2) was selected as the support due to its stable performance and high melting point (2715° C.). However, it is to be understood that other ceramic supports may be used instead of zirconia. Such alternative ceramic supports include but are not limited to calcium aluminate of formula CaAl2O4, silica of formula SiO2, titanium dioxide of formula TiO2, perovskite of formula CaTiO3, alumina of formula Al2O3, yttrium dioxide of formula Y2O3, barium zirconate of formula BaZrO3, magnesium aluminate of formula MgAl2O4, magnesium silicate of formula MgSi2O4 and lanthanum oxide of formula La2O3. Tungsten oxide is used as a promoter to facilitate the formation of a stable NiWO4 interaction complex. The synthesized oxygen carrier catalyst is intended to be used in CLC to enhance the reactivity and mitigate the formation of carbon on the catalyst surface. The catalysts described herein have excellent performance relative to the individual metal oxides. Methods of synthesizing the catalyst and evaluating the catalyst for the CLC process are also described.
Materials and Methods
Metal Precursors—Tungstic acid (H2WO4 powder) was used as a source of bulk WO3. Nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (N2NiO6.6H2O) was used as a source of nickel for the impregnation and co-precipitation methods used to prepare the oxygen carrier catalysts. Ammonium metatungstate ((NH4)6(H2W12O40)) was used as a source of tungsten for the impregnation method. Tungsten (VI) chloride (WCl6) was used as a source of tungsten for the co-precipitation method. For the support, zirconium (IV) oxynitrate hydrate (N2O7Zr.xH2O) was used as a support precursor for the co-precipitation method, and commercial zirconia (zirconium (IV) oxide (ZrO2)), was used for the impregnation method. All chemicals were purchased from Sigma Aldrich, Canada, except for the commercial zirconia support, which was purchased from Alfa Aesar. All compounds were used without modifications unless otherwise specified hereinbelow.
Bulk tungsten trioxide (WO3) was prepared by thermal decomposition of tungstic acid (H2WO4) in powder form at 800° C. for 4 hours as previously described.5,6
The WO3/ZrO2 used in this investigation was prepared as previously described.3, 11-13
In one preparation method, the WO3—NiO over zirconia catalyst was prepared by co-precipitation as previously described5,6 with modification of the calcination temperature to 900° C. to provide enhanced stability of the catalyst.
In another preparation method, the WO3—NiO over zirconia catalyst was prepared using the impregnation method as previously described11 with incorporation of the nickel precursor initially derived from the Ni(NO3)3.6H2O, with modification of the calcination temperature to 900° C.
Bulk WO3 was prepared by thermal decomposition and the mono and dual catalysts were prepared using co-precipitation and impregnation methods. Dual and mono catalysts were prepared using the co-precipitation method and the specific catalyst composition was determined.
For the preparation of WO3/ZrO2 using the co-precipitation method, ethanol was used to dissolve tungsten (VI) chloride (WCl6) and zirconium (IV) oxynitrate hydrate (N2O7Zr.xH2O) (since water cannot be used for the dissolution of WCl6). Sodium hydroxide (NaOH) was then added to the mixture to raise the pH to range between 8-9, as verified using a pH meter. The addition of the base (NaOH) resulted in the formation of precipitates of the supported oxygen carriers. After 2 hours of continuous mixing, the solution was filtered using filter paper, and washed with distilled water to remove sodium and chloride compounds from the sample. Then the sample was dried at 80° C. for 1 day, followed by sample grinding and calcination at 900° C. for 4 hours.
For NiO—WO3/ZrO2 co-precipitation, the nickel precursor nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (N2NiO6.6H2O) was added to ethanol with the other precursors according to the required amount of each composition (composition is based on weight percentages for the total oxygen carrier i.e. metal+support), and the same procedure was followed for the remaining preparation steps.
Preparation of dual and mono catalysts using the impregnation method was conducted by first determining the specific catalyst composition.
For the preparation of WO3/ZrO2 using the impregnation method, distilled water was used to soak ammonium metatungstate ((NH4)6(H2W12O40)) and commercial zirconia (ZrO2). The solution was continuously mixed for 24 hours and then the sample was heated to evaporate the water by maintaining the mixture at a temperature of 75° C. The sample was then placed in an oven at 120° C. for 1 day, to promote complete drying, followed by sample grinding and calcination at 900° C. for 4 hours.
For NiO—WO3/ZrO2-impregnation, the nickel precursor nickel (II) nitrate hexahydrate (N2NiO6.6H2O) was added to water with (NH4)6(H2W12O40) and ZrO2, to provide the required amounts for each composition. The solution was continuously mixed for 24 hours and then the sample was heated to evaporate the water by maintaining the mixture at a temperature of 75° C. The sample was then placed in an oven at 120° C. for 1 day, to promote complete drying, followed by sample grinding. The pure zirconia used to prepare the catalysts of various compositions was calcined at 900° C. for 4 hours.
All catalyst compositions described herein are based on weight percentages for the complete oxygen carrier catalyst. For example, it is to be understood that a composition indicated as “NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)ZrO2” will include 20% (w/w) NiO, 20% (w/w) WO3 and 60% (w/w) ZrO2.
Characterization of Catalysts and CLC Testing—The oxygen carrier catalysts were tested to assess their reduction and oxidation cycles for the CLC process using a PerkinElmer 8000 TGA (thermogravimetric analyzer) by loading 10 mg of oxidized catalyst into a platinum crucible and placing it in the designated sample holder at 50° C. Then, the analyzer was programmed to raise the temperature inside the chamber from 50° C. to 850° C. at a heating rate of 100° C./min with a nitrogen flow rate of 20 mL/min. The temperature was kept at 850° C. for 3 minutes before starting the CLC cycles. To reduce the oxygen carrier catalyst, the entering stream was switched to fuel. The fuel flow was controlled by a gas mixing device (GMD 8000 PerkinElmer) which was set to introduce 40% (vol.) of the entering flow of methane and 60% nitrogen (for safety reasons) with a total flow rate of 20 mL/min. The fuel oxidation (catalyst reduction) continued for 5 minutes before purging the chamber with nitrogen for 5 minutes at a flow rate of 20 mL/min. After that, the catalyst oxidation cycle was performed by switching the inlet stream to air at 20 mL/min. These three steps form one cycle (catalyst reduction, nitrogen purging, and catalyst oxidation), thereby completing the reduction and oxidation cycle. The reduction and oxidation cycle was repeated as required before cooling off the thermogravimetric analyzer to 50° C. once again. The sample weight percentage change was recorded with the increase in the weight of the catalyst during oxidation being due to oxygen sorption by the sample and weight loss during sample reduction being due to loss of oxygen for fuel combustion.
Characterization of the oxygen carriers by X-ray powder diffraction was performed using a Rigaku X-ray diffractometer (Multiflux 2 kW Copper target). The samples were placed horizontally on the sample holder. The samples were irradiated by Cu k-alpha radiation (wavelength of 1.5406 Å) to excite characteristic x-rays with two-theta diffraction angles ranging from 20-80 degrees, a 0.02 degree step, and a scanning rate of 2 degrees per minute. The equipment was operated with 40 kV voltage and 40 mA current. XRD patterns of various samples were obtained and analyzed for phase identification using the Jade 6 XRD MDI library.
Surface area and porosimetry measurements were performed using an ASAP 2020 porosimeter. Firstly, samples were degassed at 120° C. for 120 minutes to prepare the sample for analysis be removing any adsorbed surface moisture. Then, sample analysis was performed with N2 adsorption-desorption in the analysis chamber, where the sample was submerged in liquid nitrogen.
The experimental oxygen carrying capacity was calculated as:
Where: Wox is the weight of fully oxidized oxygen carrier catalyst,
Wred is the weight of reduced oxygen carrier catalyst, and
Rexp is the experimental oxygen carrying capacity.
The first cycle data obtained for oxygen carrying capacity of unsupported tungsten oxide, supported tungsten oxide via co-precipitation and impregnation along with dual metal oxide oxygen carrier catalyst with different percentages of WO3 loading are listed in Table 1. The oxygen carrying capacity of bulk WO3 is 0.175%, and WO3 supported by co-precipitation has a capacity of 0.414% which higher than the capacity of the equivalent catalyst prepared by impregnation (0.085%). The zirconia was tested for its contribution towards the reaction, and it showed very low reactivity.
The co-precipitated dual oxygen carrier catalyst NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)/ZrO2 has higher oxygen carrying capacity (6.639%) than the impregnated catalyst (5.825%). However, other factors such as stability and coke formation favor the impregnation method of preparation as discussed hereinbelow with respect to stability testing.
The impregnation method was used to further investigate the optimum compositions of the dual oxygen carrier catalyst. Optimal WO3 loading was studied by starting with the single NiO/ZrO2 oxygen carrier catalyst and then increasing the percentage of WO3 loading. The single oxygen carrier catalyst NiO(20%)/ZrO2 showed oxygen carrying capacity of 3.389% with coke formation. Adding 5% of WO3 to the oxygen carrier resulted in 3.188% oxygen carrying capacity for the NiO(20%)-WO3(5%)/ZrO2. However, further increasing the WO3 loading was found to improve the oxygen carrying capacity to 4.200% and 4.187% for NiO(20%)-WO3(10%)/ZrO2 and NiO(20%)-WO3(15%)/ZrO2, respectively. Coke formation was found to persist up to WO3 loading of 15%. Increasing the WO3 loading to 20% in NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)/ZrO2 resulted in elimination of coke formation and improved the oxygen carrying capacity to 5.825%. Further increases of the WO3 percentage provided coke-free oxygen carrier catalysts and improved CLC performance. The optimum WO3 loading was found to be 25% resulting in 6.484% capacity. Increasing the level of WO3 loading beyond this point decreases the oxygen capacity as shown in Table 1.
The NiO loading was varied for the optimal 25% WO3 loading to investigate the effect of the NiO loading on the oxygen carrying capacity. The results are shown in Table 2.
Generally, increasing the NiO loading in the oxygen carrier enhances the oxygen carrier capacity. However, coke formation was observed for the NiO(65%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2, (70%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 and (75%)-WO3(25%) samples during CLC testing. This will be discussed further hereinbelow.
Stability of the Oxygen Carrier Catalysts in CLC—
At first, the WO3 bulk sample (prepared from thermal decomposition of tungstic acid) was tested for CLC in a TGA analysis over 3 cycles (
The performance of catalysts formed of WO3 dispersed on ZrO2 prepared by the co-precipitation method and by the impregnation method are shown in
After confirming the low reactivity of WO3 for the methane CLC experiment, samples of NiO—WO3 dispersed on ZrO2 were tested as shown in
Also indicated in
Different WO3 loadings were added to the NiO/ZrO2 catalyst using the impregnation method to study the effect of the dual oxygen carrier catalyst on CLC performance. The NiO/ZrO2 catalyst with 20% (w/w) loading of NiO was used as a baseline catalyst modified by addition of WO3 in the following percentages: 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%. The performance of NiO(20%)/ZrO2 for 20 CLC cycles is shown in
The TGA profile of the base material NiO(20%)/ZrO2 (
The addition of 5% WO3 forms the NiO(20%)-WO3(5%)/ZrO2 dual oxygen carrier catalyst where the performance for 20 cycles is shown in
Increasing the loading of WO3 to 10% forms the NiO(20%)-WO3(10%)/ZrO2 dual oxygen carrier catalyst. The performance of this catalyst for methane CLC over 20 cycles is shown in
The performance of NiO(20%)-WO3(15%)/ZrO2 is shown in
The performance of NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)/ZrO2 is shown in
Similar performance was observed for NiO(20%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2, NiO(20%)-WO3(30%)/ZrO2 and NiO(20%)-WO3(35%)/ZrO2 samples with the oxygen carrying capacity beginning to decrease when the loading of WO3 exceeded 25%, as observed in
A comparison between the baseline oxygen carrier catalyst (NiO(20%)/ZrO2) and the dual oxygen carrier catalyst (NiO(20%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2) is shown in
Further testing was conducted to assess the effect of changing the amount NiO loading while keeping the amount of WO3 loading constant at 25%, which represents an optimal amount of loaded WO3. The oxygen carrier catalysts range from 5% NiO to 75% NiO loading. The NiO(5%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 sample through NiO(60%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 sample showed no carbon formation for 20 cycles of CLC (data not shown). The addition of 65% loading of NiO in the NiO(65%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 and 75% NiO loading in the NiO(70%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2, as well as the unsupported NiO(75%)-WO3(25%) sample showed formation of carbon during the 20 cycles of CLC testing. Data indicating CLC performance for NiO(60%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2, NiO(65%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2, NiO(70%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 and unsupported NiO(75%)-WO3(25%) are shown in
Porosimetry and Surface Area Analyses—Porosimetry and surface area analyses for the single oxide oxygen carrier catalysts and dual oxygen carrier catalysts with varying amounts of WO3 loading are shown in Table 3.
The Brunauer-Emmett-Teller (BET) surface area calculated for unsupported and supported tungsten oxide and dual oxygen carrier catalysts with different tungsten loading is shown in Table 3. Bulk WO3 was found to have the smallest surface area. The calcined commercial zirconia support has a surface area of 2.94 m2/g. This surface area was found to decrease when the WO3 was dispersed on the support using both co-precipitation and impregnation methods. However, WO3(40%)/ZrO2 prepared using the impregnation method was found to have a smaller surface area than the catalyst prepared using the co-precipitation method. When comparing the dispersion of NiO on zirconia with the dispersion of WO3, it can be seen that the NiO(20%)/ZrO2 prepared by impregnation has a greater surface area than the zirconia support. For the dual metallic oxygen carrier catalyst (NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)/ZrO2), the sample prepared by co-precipitation has a higher BET surface area than the same catalyst prepared by impregnation. For comparison of the different WO3 loadings in the NiO(20%)/ZrO2 sample, the catalyst with 5% WO3 slightly decreases the BET surface area from 6.66 m2/g to 6.20 m2/g. Further increasing loading of WO3 to 10% significantly decreases the surface area to 4.14 m2/g. Then, for the 15% and 20% WO3 loadings, the surface area increases to 5.89 m2/g and 6.47 m2/g, respectively. The NiO(20%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 surface area was found to be lower than that of NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)/ZrO2. Further increases in WO3 loading to 30% increases the surface area to 6.8198 m2/g, but then additional loading of WO3 causes a decrease in surface area to 6.1018 m2/g.
The pore volume and the adsorption average pore width of the tested samples are also shown in Table 3. Generally, a trend similar to the surface area trend was observed. Bulk WO3 has the lowest pore volume and pore width among all measurements. The calcined commercial zirconia has a pore volume of 0.0129 cm3/g and an average pore width of 175 Å. Samples of WO3 supported on commercial zirconia have a smaller pore volume regardless of the preparation method. However, the average pore width is higher for the sample prepared by co-precipitation (206 Å). The dual metallic oxygen carrier catalyst (NiO(20%)-WO3(20%)/ZrO2) prepared by impregnation has a greater pore width (300 Å) compared to the same sample prepared by co-precipitation (233 Å). For the dual metallic OC prepared by impregnation, the NiO(20%)-WO3(10%) catalyst was found to have a small pore volume of 0.03000 cm3/g, and increasing the amount of loading of WO3 did not significantly change the pore volume. However, these pore volumes remain generally higher than the pore volume of NiO(20%)/ZrO2 (0.0403 cm3/g).
Porosimetry and surface area analyses for carriers with varying NiO loadings and WO3 loading of 25% supported by ZrO2 are shown in Table 4.
The surface area of dual oxygen carrier catalysts with varying amounts of NiO loading was found to increase with increasing the NiO loading from 5% up to 65% with the highest surface area of 16.8747 m2/g for the NiO(65%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2. Moreover, the surface area is 15.6031 m2/g for NiO(65%)-WO3(25%)/ZrO2 with only 5% of the sample comprising the ZrO2 support. A further decrease of the surface area to 14.1919 m2/g was observed for the unsupported NiO(75%)-WO3(25%).
Regarding the pore volume of the oxygen carriers with varying NiO loading and WO3 loading of 25%, the general trend observed was an increase of pore volume with NiO loading peaking at 60% NiO loading (0.0939 cm3/g) after which the pore volume decreases with increasing NiO loading.
The average pore size of the oxygen carrier catalysts with varying NiO loading and WO3 loading of 25% was found to increase with increasing the amount of NiO loading between 5% and 20%. However, further increases in NiO loading resulted in fluctuations in the average pore size with a decreasing trend with increasing in NiO loading. The observed change of the BET surface area and pore structure of the samples could be related to effects arising from the preparation methods and the change of the phases formed on oxygen carrier catalysts, as outlined demonstrated hereinbelow with respect to the results of XRD analyses).
X-Ray Powder Diffraction Analyses—X-ray powder diffraction (XRD) patterns are shown in
The XRD patterns of the dual metal oxide catalysts prepared by impregnation with constant WO3 loading (25%) and varied NiO loading are shown in
As previously reported by Tijani et. al,15 the thermally stable zirconia support (2715° C. melting point) does not show evidence of any interaction with the active metals, which facilitates the reduction of the metal oxides. However, upon increasing the loading of the WO3 (to 10% and more) in the dual metallic oxygen carrier with 20% nickel loading, the nickel and tungsten become involved in a strong interaction with each other, resulting in formation of the NiWO4 phase. The presence of this phase is believed to be related to the enhancement of the oxygen carrying capacity of samples in which this phase exists. It has been suggested that the NiWO4 may be reduced by two different pathways7: (i) reduction of NiWO4 into a NiWOx compound, and (ii) decomposition of NiWO4 into NiO and WO3* (which similar to the bulk WO3), which are further reduced to Ni and WOy. Among these two possibilities the decomposition pathway appears to be the most probable.
Scherrer's equation (equation 4) was used to estimate the crystal size of the samples:
Where: <L> is the measure of the particle dimension in the direction normal to the reflecting plane
K is a constant (usually taken as 1)
λ is the wavelength of the X-rays used to excite the samples (0.15406 nm)
β is the width of the peak in radians
θ is the angle confined between the beam and the plane perpendicular to the reflecting plane.
The FWHM (Full Width at Half Maximum) technique used to estimate the width of the peaks. The results are shown in Table 5.
aCrystallite/phase size estimated using Scherrer's equation on the (−1 1 1) plane of baddeleyite, syn-(ZrO2 37-1484) phase
bCrystallite/phase size estimated using Scherrer's equation on the (2 0 2) plane of tungsten oxide-(WO3 43-1035) phase
cCrystallite/phase size estimated using Scherrer's equation on the (0 1 1) plane of zirconium oxide-(ZrO2 50-1089) phase
dCrystallite/phase size estimated using Scherrer's equation on the (2 0 0) plane of bunsenite, syn-(NiO 47-1049) phase
eCrystallite/phase size estimated using Scherrer's equation on the (1 1 0) plane of tungsten oxide-(WO3 41-0905) phase
fCrystallite/phase size estimated using Scherrer's equation on the (−1 1 1) plane of nickel tungsten oxide-(NiWO4 15-0755) phase.
The sizes of the crystallites (nm) of the oxygen carrier catalysts are listed in Table 5. The uncertainty involved in the estimation of the FWHM from MDI Jade 6 is less than 10% for all samples. For the tungsten oxide phase, the crystallite size is smaller in the supported samples than in the bulk metal oxide samples. Generally, the impregnated samples formed by impregnation have higher crystallite/phase sizes than the samples formed by co-precipitation, except for the NiWO4 phase (54 nm impregnated and 57 co-precipitated) which falls within the margin of error. The crystal size for the tungsten oxide phase is about 44 nm for both Ni(20%)-WO3(5%)-ZrO2-Impregnation and Ni(20%)-WO3(10%)-ZrO2-Impregnation samples. With further loading of WO3 (i.e. Ni(20%)-WO3(15%)-ZrO2-Impregnation), the crystallite size is reduced to 32 nm before the disappearance of the phase with Ni(20%)-WO3(20%)-ZrO2-Impregnation sample and samples loaded with more WO3. For the oxygen carriers with constant WO3 loading of 25%, and different nickel oxide loading, the crystallite size of the nickel tungsten oxide phase was between 47-58 nm, while the size for the bunsenite phase was between 25-32 nm. It was also observed that as the NiO loading increases, the crystallite size of this phase also increases.
Other than described herein, or unless otherwise expressly specified, all of the numerical ranges, amounts, values and percentages, such as those for amounts of materials, elemental contents, times and temperatures, ratios of amounts, and others, in the following portion of the specification and attached claims may be read as if prefaced by the word “about” even though the term “about” may not expressly appear with the value, amount, or range. Accordingly, unless indicated to the contrary, the numerical parameters set forth in the following specification and attached claims are approximations that may vary depending upon the desired properties sought to be obtained. At the very least, and not as an attempt to limit the application of the doctrine of equivalents to the scope of the claims, each numerical parameter should at least be construed in light of the number of reported significant digits and by applying ordinary rounding techniques.
Any patent, publication, internet site, or other disclosure material, in whole or in part, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein is incorporated herein only to the extent that the incorporated material does not conflict with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth in this disclosure. As such, and to the extent necessary, the disclosure as explicitly set forth herein supersedes any conflicting material incorporated herein by reference. Any material, or portion thereof, that is said to be incorporated by reference herein, but which conflicts with existing definitions, statements, or other disclosure material set forth herein will only be incorporated to the extent that no conflict arises between that incorporated material and the existing disclosure material.
Unless otherwise defined, all technical and scientific terms used herein have the same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in the art.
It will be understood by those skilled in the art that various changes in form and details may be made to the embodiments described therein without departing from the scope of the invention encompassed by the appended claims.
In the claims, articles such as “a,” “an,” and “the” may mean one or more than one unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context. Claims or descriptions that include “or” between one or more members of a group are considered satisfied if one, more than one, or all of the group members are present in, employed in, or otherwise relevant to a given product or process unless indicated to the contrary or otherwise evident from the context.
It is also noted that the term “comprising” is intended to be open and permits but does not require the inclusion of additional elements or steps. When the term “comprising” is used herein, the term “consisting of” is thus also encompassed and disclosed. Where ranges are given, endpoints are included. Furthermore, it is to be understood that unless otherwise indicated or otherwise evident from the context and understanding of one of ordinary skill in the art, values that are expressed as ranges can assume any specific value or subrange within the stated ranges in different embodiments of the invention, to the tenth of the unit of the lower limit of the range, unless the context clearly dictates otherwise. Where the term “about” is used, it is understood to reflect +/−10% of the recited value. In addition, it is to be understood that any particular embodiment of the present invention that falls within the prior art may be explicitly excluded from any one or more of the claims. Since such embodiments are deemed to be known to one of ordinary skill in the art, they may be excluded even if the exclusion is not set forth explicitly herein.
This application claims priority from U.S. Provisional Application Ser. No. 63/017,352, filed on Apr. 29, 2020, the entire disclosure of which is incorporated herein by reference.
| Number | Name | Date | Kind |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20060245999 | Shen | Nov 2006 | A1 |
| 20100092898 | Dahl | Apr 2010 | A1 |
| 20120261311 | Bellussi | Oct 2012 | A1 |
| 20170210622 | Nestl | Jul 2017 | A1 |
| 20200087576 | Marker | Mar 2020 | A1 |
| Number | Date | Country |
|---|---|---|
| 106902837 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| 106902837 | Jun 2017 | CN |
| Entry |
|---|
| Machine translatin of CN-106902837-A, publication date Jun. 2017. |
| Sheng et al. (Effects of tungsten on the catalytic activity of Ni—W catalysts for the hydrogenation of aromatic hydrocarbons, Reaction Kinetics, Mechanisms and Catalysis vol. 99, pp. 371-379 (2010)). |
| Fan, L-S et al. Energy Environ. Sci., 2012, 5, 7254-7280. |
| Fang, H et al. Int. J. Chem. Eng., 2009 Article ID 710515, 1-16, doi:10.1155/2009/710515. |
| Kodama, T. et al., Energy 2000, 25, 411-425. |
| Charisiou, N. D. et al., Front. Envir. Sci. 2017, 5, Article 66, 1-13, doi.org/10.3389/fenvs.2017.00066. |
| Chen, S. et a., ACS Catal., 2017, 5, 3548-3559. |
| Southmayd D. W. et al., J. Chem. Soc. Faraday Trans. 1993, 89, 2075-2083. |
| Sohn, J. R. & Lee, S. Y. Appl. Catal. A: General, 1997, 164, 127-140. |
| Torres, G. C. et al., Quim. Nova, 2012, 35, 748-754. |
| Cho, P. et al., Ind. Eng. Chem. Res. 2005, 44, 668-676. |
| Shimizu, T. et al., Solar Energy 2001, 71, 315-324. |
| Kodama T. et al., Energy, 2003, 28, 1055-1068. |
| Kwak, J. H. Int. J. Hydrogen Energy, 2013, 38, 8293-8305. |
| Quddus, M. R. A Novel Mixed Metallic Oxygen Carrier for Chemical Looping Combustion: Preparation, Characterization and Kinetic Modeling (Thesis), 2013, University of Western Ontario. |
| Tijani, M. M et al., Energy, 2017, 138, 873-882. |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 20210339231 A1 | Nov 2021 | US |
| Number | Date | Country | |
|---|---|---|---|
| 63017352 | Apr 2020 | US |
